Date- 6.1.
20
Present case has been transferred from Honourable Sessions Judge’s Court.
Appellant was represented by Adv. MR. HARSHEK CHAUBEY.
The case is set for arguments on the admissibility of appeal.
The arguments were heard on the admissibility presented by appellant’s advocate.
Prima facie appeal appears eligible for final hearing. Hence, it is accepted for final hearing.
The case is already registered in the register.
Record of subordinate court should be summoned.
Date should be submitted for the final argument of the case.
Dr. (Smt.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Sixth Additional Sessions Judge Ujjain
12.4.19
Advocate Shri Radheshyam Batham was present on behalf of the appellant.
Initial arguments were heard.
This criminal appeal for the purpose of final hearing is admissible before final hearing.
Appeals from pre-numerical point of view, the Appeal is registered on C.R.A. No.89/19.
Therefore, the above number of appeals will remain valid.
On submission of copy, the respondent shall be duly admitted on behalf of the appellant. The
record of the trial court should be called in the presence of the respondent.
Arguments were heard on the application of Section 389 DA attached to the appeal.
Appear after some time for order.
Dr. (Mrs.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Sixth Additional Sessions Judge
Ujjain M.P.
As per sec. 389 of CrPc. Order was passed in open court.
A copy of the order should be sent to the subordinate court for information / compliance.
The case should be presented on 29.04.19 for final arguments.
Dr. (Mrs.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Sixth Additional Sessions Judge
Ujjain M.P.
10.10.19
Adv. Mr.S.P. The Kosta was present from the appellant side.
Case is set for argument on admissibility of the appeal.
The arguments were heard on the admissibility of the appellant advocate.
Prima facie appeal appears eligible for final hearing. Hence, it is accepted for final hearing.
The case is already registered in the register.
Record of subordinate court should be summoned.
The case should be presented for final argument on --- .
Dr. (Smt.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Sixth Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge (POCSO Act 2012)
Ujjain M.P.
27.1.21
Adv. Mr. MM Joshi was present from the side of Appellant / applicant
Adv. Mr. Umesh Sharma was present from the side of respondent / non-applicant.
The case is set for decision.
The decision is typed separately, signed and declared accordingly on the due date in open court.
Appeal submitted by appellant / applicant was accepted.
The original record along with the copy of the decision should be submitted to the subordinate
court for information.
The result of this appeal case should be recorded and filed.
Dr. (Mrs.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Special Judge (POCSO Act 2012) Additional Sessions Judge
Ujjain
17.03.20
Adv. Mr. Suraj Bacheria Special Public Prosecutor was present to represent state.
Accused Yogesh, Dinesh, Dharmendra from judicial custody, Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate on
his behalf.
The case is decided for judgement.
The decision is typed separately, signed and declared accordingly on the due date in open court.
Accordingly, Yogesh was sentenced under sections 363, 366, 376 (2) (n) of the Indian Penal
Code, Section 4 and 5 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012 and accused
Dinesh and Dharmendra were freed from the charge of section 368, 376/120-B, Indian Penal
Code and sections 4 and 5 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act 2012.
In the present case, the accused Sanjay's S/O Jairam, Rahul S/O Sanjay and Vishal S/O Sanjay
are absconding. After the abscondment of accused Sanjay's S/O Jairam, Rahul's S/O Sanjay and
Vishal's S/O Sanjay,it should be inscribed on the main page of the case b red ink to the effect
that the case should not be destroyed and kept safe.
The result of this session should be recorded and sent to the archives.
Dr. (Smt.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Special Judge (POCSO Act 2012) Sixth Additional Sessions Judge
Ujjain M.P.
20.1.21
Mr. Suraj Bacheria Special Public Prosecutor present by the State.
Accused Rakesh alias Pintu presented from judicial custody.
Advocate Shri Prakash Parmar appeared on behalf of the accused.
The case is decided for decision.
The judgment was typed separately and signed and declared in open court and declared the
accused Rakesh alias Pintu under rigorous imprisonment for 20 years (twenty years) under
Section 376AB of the Indian Penal Code and Rs.5000 / (Rupees Five Thousand). Was punished
with the penalty of imprisonment for 3 months (three months) rigorous imprisonment, fine
should be paid separately.
The result of this session should be recorded and sent to the archives.
Dr. (Smt.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Sixth Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge (POCSO Act 2012)
Ujjain M.P.
19.01.21
Appellant / abusive child by Mr. Rahul Sharma Advocate present.
Mr. Suraj Bacheria Special Public Prosecutor present by the state.
The case is decided for decision.
The decision was typed separately and signed and declared in open court and accordingly the
appeal submitted by the appellant was accepted.
Original records, including a copy of the judgment, were sent to the Juvenile Justice Board for
information.
Record the result of this appeal case and record the case.
Dr. (Mrs) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Signature of defence has advocate taken.
Under Section 294 of the Criminal Procedure Code, on behalf of the accused when his advocate
was invited to accept the prosecution documents, he refused to accept all the documents.
For the purpose to protect the privacy of the victims, in view of the guidelines in 703, passed by
Hon'ble Supreme Court the victim will be addressed in full consideration in the name of the
prosecutorix and in order to preserve the disclosure of the identity of the prosecutorix in
compliance with the mandatory provisions of Section 33 (7) of the Protection of Children from
Sexual Offenses Act 2012. For the entire trial, the name of the prosecutorix and his parents has
not been disclosed and the name of the school of the prosecutorix has not been disclosed.
The trial program was presented by the prosecution. According to the trial program, witness
number 1 prosecutorix, witness no.2 prosecutorix husband's and witness no.3 should be
presented through Summon.
The case should be presented on 10.2.20 for prosecution evidence.
Dr. (Smt.) Aarti Shukla Pandey
Special Judge (POCSO Act 2012)
Sixtyth Additional Sessions Judge Ujjain M.P.
