Dimeglio 2012
Dimeglio 2012
  The French method, also called the functional physical                   make surgery easier and less extensive. From the
  therapy method, is a combination of physiotherapy,                       French method to the Ponseti method, the Hybrid method
  splinting and surgery à la carte. The French functional                 or the ‘the third way’, combining the advantages of both
  physical therapy method consists of daily manipulations                  methods, is the future. The primary reason for relapses
  of the newborn’s clubfoot by a specialized physical                      is the inability of families to maintain the correction initially
  therapist, stimulation of the muscles around the foot and                achieved. The aim of this work is to provide an overview
  temporary immobilization of the foot with elastic and                    of the French functional physical therapy method and to
  nonelastic adhesive taping. Physiotherapy is optimized                   help understand how it has evolved over time. J Pediatr
  by early triceps surae lengthening. Sequences of plaster                 Orthop B 21:28–39 
    c 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health |
  can also be used. If conservative treatment is no longer                 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  effective, surgery should be considered. Mini-invasive                   Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2012, 21:28–39
  surgery is a complementary procedure to nonoperative
  treatment (surgery ‘à la carte’). The French method reduces             Keywords: clubfoot, clubfoot surgery, French functional method,
                                                                           physiotherapy and clubfoot, Ponseti method
  but does not eliminate the need for mini-invasive surgical
                                                                           a
  procedures. Equinus is the most difficult deformity to treat;             University of Montpellier, Faculty of Medicine and bPediatric Surgery
                                                                           Department, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont Ferrand, France
  posterior release is sometimes necessary in a severe
  foot. Very severe feet (stiff–stiff; score, 16–20) are still a           Correspondence to Professor Alain Dimeglio, MD, University of Montpellier,
                                                                           Faculty of Medicine, 2, rue de l’Ecole de Médecine, Montpellier 34000, France
  challenge. However, regular manipulations and splinting                  Tel: + 33 608 332 826; fax: + 33 981 704 790;
  improve foot morphology and stiffness, and, ultimately,                  e-mail: alaindimeglio@wanadoo.fr
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
                                                                           The French functional physical therapy Dimeglio and Canavese 29
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Derotation Adduction
0°
–20° 20°
1 2 45°
                                                                                                                                    3
                                                                 90°
                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                         4
                                                          4
                                0                                                                                                              90°
                                                     3
                                      1        2              45°
–20° 20°
0°
 Clubfoot classification (derotation). A small goniometer can be used to   Clubfoot classification (adduction). A small goniometer can be used to
 assess the reducibility.                                                  assess the reducibility.
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
  30   Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2012, Vol 21 No 1
Fig. 4 Fig. 6
Equinus
−20° 0
                            1
              0°
                            2                                            Medial crease (1 point).
                   20°          3
                                        4
                            45°
                                                                         calcaneo-pedal complex around the talus are performed.
                                             90°
                                                                         The reduction should never be forced.
  Clubfoot classification (equinus). A small goniometer can be used to   As soon as correction in the horizontal plane is complete,
  assess the reducibility.                                               the equinus can be addressed by lowering the calcaneus
                                                                         posteriorly. Plantar face is well maintained to avoid any
                                                                         breakage in the mid-tarsal joint. This articulation should
                                                                         not be overmanipulated and its integrity should be
  Fig. 5                                                                 valued. Moreover, manipulations should not attempt to
                                                                         correct supination by lowering the first metatarsal bone as
                                                                         it worsens the cavus [22]. When retraction is no longer
                                                                         present, manipulation becomes much easier. The func-
                                                                         tional treatment takes place during the first 3–4 months
                                                                         of the baby’s life (Figs 7–9).
                                                                         The functional method is more than a traditional
                                                                         physiotherapy; it is a philosophy based on movement. It
                                                                         is a real ‘how to know’, transmitted from one generation
                                                                         to another, from one school to another. It is a very
                                                                         demanding method, with strict requirements and rules; it
                                                                         has been widely described in the literature [6–12].
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
                                                                                  The French functional physical therapy Dimeglio and Canavese 31
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Decoaptation of the tarsal-navicular joint with maintenance of the foot in plantar flexion without forcing the mid tarsal joint. The thumb stabilizes the talus.
Fig. 9
Dorsiflexion + valgisation
Correction of the equinus. Plantar face is well maintained. Counter pressure on the talus.
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
  32 Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2012, Vol 21 No 1
  taped and splinted in the stretched position to maintain     year old. After this, children wear custom-made splints to
  the correction achieved by manipulations and PMM             avoid relapse of the equinus (Figs 11–16).
  [14,15,23,24] (Fig. 10).
                                                               Resin casting is used to maintain the progress achieved by
  Since 1997, the lengthening of the tricepts surae as         manipulations. It is usually applied on Thursday evening
  described by Vulpius [25,26] has been introduced. At 3       or Friday morning and remains in place until Monday
  months of age, if a posterior crease persists, or there is   morning. The resin is moulded over the bandage, opened
  equinus (101 or more) or an empty heel or a lack of          laterally to avoid pressure and does not include the knee.
  divergence between the talus and the calcaneus on lateral
                                                               With resistant feet, a period of casting may be utilized in
  foot radiograph, triceps surae lengthening is performed as
                                                               the protocol to improve outcome and, most importantly,
  described by Vulpius. The aponeurotic tendon of the
                                                               if surgery is needed, it is always ‘à la carte’ [13] and
  gastrocnemius is exposed and an inverted V-shaped
                                                               miniinvasive.
  incision is made through it. The ankle is then forced into
  slight dorsal flexion and the segments of the tendon
  become separated [25,26]. It is a dynamic lengthening.
  This procedure is most effective between 3 and 5 months      Fig. 11
Fig. 10
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
                                                                          The French functional physical therapy Dimeglio and Canavese 33
Fig. 12 Fig. 14
–20°
0°
20°
                                             45°
                         90°
                                                                          Lateral foot radiograph in maximum dorsiflexion showing lack of
                                                                          divergence between the talus and the calcaneum: early triceps surae
                                                                          lengthening is indicated.
 Equinus is the most difficult deformity to treat. Posterior release is
 indicated when severe hind foot retraction is present.
 Fig. 13
                                                                          Fig. 15
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
  34   Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2012, Vol 21 No 1
                                                                    Fig. 17
  nonoperative treatment, which aims to reduce the extent
  of surgery in case it is required (surgery ‘à la carte’) [13].
  Surgical treatment is only needed when the orthopaedic
  treatment is no longer effective and/or when the foot
  shows no more improvement. The assessment at the
  third month is important, as a choice must be made
  between continuing the orthopaedic treatment (phy-
  siotherapy, splinting) because it is effective and surgery
  can be avoided, or continuing the orthopaedic treatment
  in order to maintain what has been achieved, while being
  aware that surgery will be necessary.
  After completion of functional physical therapy treat-
  ment, three possible options should be evaluated at age
  3–4 months:
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
                                                                   The French functional physical therapy Dimeglio and Canavese 35
Fig. 18 Fig. 20
Percutaneous lengthening of the triceps. Separate incision for medial, planter abductor hallucis release.
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
  36   Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2012, Vol 21 No 1
      immobilization is required for 6 weeks. The cast and         of very severe feet (score, 16–20) did not require
      the Kirschener wire are removed under general                extensive surgical procedures.
      anaesthesia after 3–4 weeks. This allows the surgeon
      to check the skin incisions and the foot shape. A new        Moreover, Richards et al. compared the French functional
      cast is then applied for the remaining 2–3 weeks of          physical therapy protocol with the Ponseti technique.
      immobilization.                                              They found that the initial correction rates were equal
  (4) Release of the abductor hallucis can be carried out by       (95 and 94.4%, respectively) and relapses occurred in 29
      a supplementary mini-medial incision [28].                   and 34% of the cases, respectively. At the time of the
  (5) Anterior tibialis transfer is indicated for active,          latest follow-up, the outcomes for the feet treated with
      residual foot supination. When a medial release is           the Ponseti method were good for 72%, fair for 12% and
      performed, the tendon transfer can be carried out            poor for 16%. The outcomes for the feet treated with the
      through the same incision.                                   French functional method were good for 67%, fair for 17%
  (6) Plantar fascia release through a mini-incision.              and poor for 16% [15,30].
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
                                                                  The French functional physical therapy Dimeglio and Canavese 37
 extent of surgery [10–12,23,24]. Fair results attained after     the two methods in order to combine the advantages of
 the use of the functional method may yield a poor result         both and apply them in the same strategy. Regardless of
 with growth and will need surgery (à la carte) [13]. Very       the method, the objective is the same: to reduce the
 severe feet (stiff–stiff; score, 16–20) are still a challenge.   frequency and extent of surgery and to decrease the risk
 The role of physiotherapy is to improve the morphology           of relapse.
 and the suppleness of the foot and to limit both the
 extent of surgery and the risk of relapses. In our               Over time, both methods have evolved. The plasters to
 experience, the combination of early Vulpius procedure           control reduction are now recommended every week
 and tibialis posterior lengthening (fractional lengthening)      whereas initially they were changed every 3 weeks. In the
 is an effective way to improve the effect of physiotherapy       French functional physical therapy method, short-term
 in this category of feet (Fig. 21a and b; Fig. 22a and           cast immobilization and lengthening of the achilles
 b; Fig. 23a and b).                                              tendon has been incorporated into the protocol, initiated
                                                                  by the Montpellier school. A careful manipulation by a
 The third way: from the French method to the                     skilled physical therapist for 30 min before the applica-
 Ponseti method                                                   tion of a plaster is likely to improve results and to speed
 Clubfoot correction can be carried out using different           up the reduction of the foot. Following reduction by
 techniques, such as functional rehabilitation and manip-         plaster, regular physical therapy can reduce the duration
 ulations with splints or serial casting, and all techniques      in splint and the risk of relapse in the Ponseti method.
 aim to achieve a plantigrade, painless and supple foot
                                                                  The French method is comparable to the Ponseti method
 with avoidance of surgery as much as possible.
                                                                  in aiming to avoid surgery and the associated fibro-
 Conservative treatment of clubfoot has established itself        sis [5–9,15,19–22,24,25]. The conservative treatment of
 as the primary treatment of choice, that is, treatment by        the future may probably be half-way between the Ponseti
 plaster, the Ponseti method [31] or the French functional        method [25,31] and the French functional physical
 physical therapy method.                                         therapy method [5–13], and from this, improved results
                                                                  may be expected.
 Rather than comparing them, as competitive treatments,
 the time has come to reconcile the differences between
                                                                  Lessons learned from of our experience
                                                                  A significant follow-up is necessary to evaluate the effect
                                                                  of treatment as deteriorations can occur.
 Fig. 21
                                                                  Despite some differences, all conservative treatment
                                                                  methods share the same basic principles:
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
  38   Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2012, Vol 21 No 1
Fig. 22
(a,b) Functional physical therapy method and early triceps surae lengthening. Foot morphology at age 9 years.
Fig. 23
   (7) The assessment at the third month is important, as a                       surgery can be avoided or continuing the orthopaedic
       choice must be made between continuing the                                 treatment in order to maintain what has been achieved,
       orthopaedic treatment because it is effective and                          while being aware that surgery will be necessary;
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
                                                                                      The French functional physical therapy Dimeglio and Canavese 39
  (8) Early triceps surae lengthening improves outcome                                10   Dimeglio A. Clubfoot. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical diffusion Vigot.
      and decreases the rate of extensive surgery. Very                                    (translated from French); 1985.
                                                                                      11   Dimeglio A, Dimeglio F. Clubfoot. In: Fitzgerald. RH, editor. Orthopaedics.
      severe feet (stiff–stiff; score, 16–20) are still a                                  Missouri: Mosby, Inc.; 2002. pp. 1475–1489.
      challenge. Daily manipulations, splinting and PMM                               12   Diméglio A, Bonnet F. Clubfoot physiotherapy. Encycl Méd Chir
      contribute to make surgery less extensive;                                           Kinésithérapie Médecine Physique et Réadaptation 1997; 26-428-B-10:
                                                                                           1–12, (translated from French).
  (9) A significant follow-up is necessary to evaluate the                            13   Bensahel H, Csukonyi Z, Desgrippes Y, Chaumien JP. Surgery in residual
      effect of treatment as deteriorations can be                                         clubfoot: one-stage medioposterior release ‘a la carte’. J Pediatr Orthop
      observed around and after 2 years of age. Nothing                                    1987; 7:145–148.
                                                                                      14   Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW, Rumble EJ, MacMichael D,
      can be permanently achieved before skeletal                                          Clements ND, et al. The biological effect of continuous passive motion on
      maturity;                                                                            the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage: an experimental
                                                                                           investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62-A:1232–1251.
 (10) The conservative treatment of the future is
                                                                                      15   Salter RB. The biologic concept of continuous passive motion of synovial
      probably half-way between the Ponseti method                                         joints: the first 18 years of basic research and its clinical application.
      and the French functional physical therapy method                                    Clin Orthop 1989; 242:12–25.
                                                                                      16   Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F. Classification of
      and from this point, improve results may be                                          club-foot. J Pediatr Orthop B 1995; 4:129–136.
      expected;                                                                       17   Richards BS, Johnston CE, Wilson H. No operative clubfoot treatment using
 11) The scoring system is useful to document the                                          the French physical therapy method. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25:98–102.
                                                                                      18   Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two
     severity and to analyse the results category by                                       clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18:323–327.
     category.                                                                        19   Van Mulken JM, Bulstra SK, Hoefnagels NH. Evaluation of the treatment of
                                                                                           clubfeet with the Dimeglio score. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21:642–647.
                                                                                      20   Charles YP, Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Functional physical treatment for
                                                                                           congenital clubfoot. Orthopade 2006; 35:665–674, (translated from
 Acknowledgements                                                                          German).
 Conflicts of interest                                                                21   Farabeuf LH. Surgical techniques. 4th ed. Paris: Masson. (translated from
 There are no conflicts of interest.                                                       French); 1883.
                                                                                      22   Ponseti IV. Common errors in the treatment of congenital clubfoot. Int
                                                                                           Orthop 1997; 21:137–141.
 References                                                                           23   Zeifang F, Carstens C, Schneider S, Thomsen M. Continuous passive
  1   Scarpa A. A memoir on the congenital club feet of children (translated from          motion versus immobilisation in a cast after surgical treatment of idiopathic
      Italian); 2nd ed. Pavia: Bladassarre Comino; 1806.                                   club foot in infants. A prospective, blinded, randomised, clinical study.
  2   Delpech JM. Human orthopedic morphology or anatomo-pathological                      J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87-B:1663–1665.
      investigations about causes, prevention and treatment major orthopaedic         24   Dimeglio A, Bonnet F, Mazeau P, de Rosa V. Orthopaedic treatment and
      deformities Fundanmentals of orthopaedics (translated from French);                  passive motion machine: consequences for the surgical treatment of
      Paris: Gabon; 1828.                                                                  clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 1996; 5:173–180.
  3   Browne D. Modern methods of treatment of clubfoot. BMJ 1937; ii:570.            25   Javors JR, Klaaren HE. The Vulpius procedure for correction of equinus
  4   Lovell WW, Hancock CI. Treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus. Clin             deformity in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 1987; 7:191–193.
      Orthop 1970; 70:79–86.                                                          26   Yngve DA, Chambers C. Vulpius and Z-lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;
  5   Kite JH. Non operative treatment of congenital clubfoot. Clin Orthop 1972;           16:759–763.
      84:29–38.                                                                       27   Carroll NC. Clubfoot. In: Morissy. RT, editor. Paediatric orthopaedics.
  6   Masse P. Functional method of treatment of clubfoot (translated from French);        3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990, pp. 944–951.
      In: Carlioz H, Opus JG, editors. Cahier d’enseignement de la SOFCOT:            28   Licthblau S. Section of the abduction hallucis tendon for correction of
      le pied bot varus equin. Paris: Expansion Scientifique; 1977. pp. 351–356.           metatarsus varus deformity. Clin Orthop 1975; 110:227–232.
  7   Bensahel H, Guillaume A, Csukonyi Z, Thémar-Noel C. The intimacy of            29   Al Khoury SH, Seringe R, Glorion C, Wicart P. Results of treatment of
      clubfoot: the ways of functional treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B 1994; 3:              idiopathic clubfoot with functional French method combined with Achilles
      155–160.                                                                             tenotomy in selected cases. J Child Orthop 2011; 5 (Suppl):S3.
  8   Souchet P, Bensahel H, Themar-Noel C, Pennecot G, Csukonyi Z. Functional        30   Richards S, Faulks S, Rathjen K, Karol LA, Johnston CE, Jones SA.
      treatment of clubfoot: a new series of 350 idiopathic clubfeet with long-term        A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot
      follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B 2004; 13:189–196.                                      correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy)
  9   Seringe R, Aita R. Diopathic clubfoot: results of functional treatment               method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90:2313–2321.
      (269 feet) (translated from French). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot      31   Ponseti IV. Congenital clubfoot Fundamentals of treatment. New York:
      1990; 76:490–501.                                                                    Oxford University Press; 1996.
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.