Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.
1177/0095244315618698
Effect of polyethylene glycol intercalated organoclay on vulcanisation
characteristics and reinforcement of natural rubber nanocomposites
Upul N Ratnayake1, 2, Dileepa E Prematunga1, Chaminda Peiris3,Veranja Karunaratne1,
Gehan AJ Amaratunga1, 4
1
Sri Lanka Institute of Nanotechnology (Pvt) Ltd, Homagama, Sri Lanka.
2
Rubber Research Institute, Ratmalana, Sri Lanka.
3
Camoplast Solideal, Sri Lanka.
4
Departnent of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Corresponding author:
Upul N Ratnayake, Rubber Research Institute, Telewala Road, Ratmalana ,
Sri Lanka.
Email: un_ratnayake@yahoo.co.uk
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Abstract
Organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT) clay was intercalated with low
molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) oligomer at melt stage. The intercalation
behaviour of PEG into the OMMT clay galleries and its interaction with clay platelets
were characterized with X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetric
(DSC) techniques.
A natural rubber (NR)-organoclay nanocomposite (NROCN) was prepared by melt
compounding of NR with polyethylene glycol treated organoclay (P-OMMT) and other
compounding chemicals using a laboratory scale internal mixer. XRD analysis of the
nanocomposites revealed the intercalation of NR molecules into the P-OMMT clay
galleries and subsequent exfoliation during the melt compounding process.
Vulcanization characteristics of the NROCN, especially processing safety and optimum
curing time, has been interpreted with reference to the organic modifier of the
montmorillonite clay, PEG modification and the degree of exfoliation.
Solid-state mechanical properties of P-OMMT clay filled NROCN vulcanisates have
shown a significant enhancement in stiffness and strength characteristics whilst without
scarifying the elasticity of the nanocomposites. Results have been explained in terms of
the degree of exfoliation, dispersability of the organoclay and strain induced
crystallization of the natural rubber.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Keywords
Nanocomposites, natural rubber, organoclay, intercalation, exfoliation, polyethylene
glycol, strain induced crystallization
Introduction
Soft elastomeric materials turn into useful engineering materials when they are
reinforced with higher percentage of particulate fillers especially carbon black and
silica, for many industrial applications. However, higher loading levels of these
reinforcing fillers, particularly carbon black, impart a significant loss in elastic
behaviour of the natural rubber (NR) vulcanisates, an inherent property of NR, and also
cause difficulties in processing of such highly filled NR compounds (Arroyo et al.,
2003). In recent past, polymeric nanocomposites, a new class of composite materials,
based on layered silicates (clay) have inspired the scientific and industrial community as
an alternative for conventional polymeric composites because of their unique material
properties such as mechanical, thermal, electrical and barrier properties in comparison
to their conventional counterparts (Vaia and Wagner, 2004; Tjong, 2006; Paul and
Robeson, 2008). Montmorillonite (MMT) clay, which belongs to a general family of 2:1
layered silicates, has attracted as a potential layered silicate material for synthesizing
polymeric nanocomposite materials since MMT clay particles can be separated into
individual layers/platelets with 1 nm thickness while being amenable for surface
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
modification through ion exchange reactions (Alexandre and Dubois, 2000;
Giannelisetal, 1999). Generally, hydrophilic MMT clay needs to be converted into
organophilic to make it more compatible with non-polar elastomers such as NR.
Natural rubber is an important engineering material for numerous applications such as
tyres, automotive and engineering components, etc. In recent years, layered silicates,
especially organically modified MMT clay (organoclay), have been identified as a
potential reinforcing nanomaterials for NR, substituting the conventional reinforcing
filler, because of their ability to enhance the mechanical properties and to impart new
functionality to NR vulcanisates at very low loading levels (i.e. less than 10 phr.)
(Cataldo,2007; Tabsan et al, 2010; Rattanasom et al, 2009). NR/organoclay
nanocomposites have been synthesised with enhanced material properties using
different preparative techniques such as direct melt blending, solution blending and
latex compounding by different research groups (Sengupta et al., 2007; Qureshi and
Qammar,2010; Karger-Kocsis and Varghese,2003). However, irrespective of the
preparation techniques, exfoliation of the organoclay particles into individual clay
platelets of nanometre scale thickness and dispersing them uniformly within the NR
matrix are the key factors to enhance the physical properties of the NR compounds. The
degree of organoclay exfoliation/dispersion and the interaction between organoclay and
the NR determines the extent of property enhancement in rubber compounds (Sengupta
et al., 2007; Arroyo et al., 2007). One of the main obstacles to achieving the highest
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
degree of exfoliation of the clay within the NR matrix is the limited compatibility
between NR and organoclay materials.
Main objective of this research study was to evaluate the possibilities of improving the
degree of exfoliation and subsequent dispersion of clay in the NR matrix in view of
improving the reinforcement by the intercalation of organoclay with low molecular
weight polyethylene glycol (PEG). On the basis of intercalation of PEG into the clay
galleries, a new preparation method for NR/clay nanocomposites is explored. The effect
of PEG modified organoclay on processability in terms of curing characteristics and the
reinforcement of the NR nanocomposite materials is also described.
Experimental method
Materials
NR in the form of ribbed smoked sheet (RSS) was used as the elastomeric material for
preparing NR/organoclay nanocomposites. Montmorillonite clay (Cloisite20A),
modified with dimethyl dihydrogenated tallow quaternary ammonium chloride and with
a density of 1.77 g/cm3was used as the organoclay and was supplied by Southern Clay
Products, USA.
Polyethylene glycol oligomer with an average molecular weight of 4000 g/mol
(PEG4000) was used as a co-intercalant. Compounding ingredients such as sulphur,
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
accelerator, ZnO and antioxidants, etc. are of commercial grade and were supplied by
Camoplast Solideal, Sri Lanka.
Preparation of PEG intercalated OMMT (P-OMMT) clay
Organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT) clay powder was ground with the PEG
powder at different weight ratios. The resultant OMMT/PEG mixture was heated in an
oven at 85 oC for 60 minutes and further grounded after the heat treatment. Table 1
depicts the composition of each OMMT modified with PEG (P-OMMT clay).The
resultant P-OMMT clay was analysed with X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential
scanning calorimetric (DSC) techniques to investigate the intercalation ability of PEG
molecules into the organoclay galleries and its interaction with the clay platelets.
Glass transition (Tg) temperature of PEG in P-OMMT clay relative to pure PEG
oligomer was measured with a differential scanning calorimeter (TA instrument, model
Q200) of temperature modulation mode (MDSC) with a temperature modulation
amplitude and modulation period of 1 oC and 100 seconds respectively at a heating rate
of 2 oC/min.
Preparation of natural rubber-organoclay nanocomposite (NROCN) materials
NROCN was prepared by melt compounding of NR and organoclay in the presence of
vulcanising chemicals in a laboratory scale internal mixer (Haake Rheomix 600)
operating at 60 0C (set temperature) with an initial rotor speed of 80 rpm for 8 minutes
followed another 4 minutes with a rotor speed of 60 rpm. The mixing conditions were
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
predetermined as the most appropriate mixing cycle. Table 2 presents the exact
formulation for each NROCN material.
Table1. Compositions of P-OMMT clay
P-OMMT OMMT PEG 4000
Clay Parts Parts
OMMT 1.00 0.00
P-OMMT -1 1.00 0.25
P-OMMT -2 1.00 0.50
P-OMMT -3 1.00 0.75
P-OMMT -4 1.00 1.00
Vulcanisation characteristics
The effect of OMMT and its modification with PEG on the vulcanisation characteristics
of the organoclay filled rubber compounds were studied with a Moving Die Rheometer
(MDR-Ektron EKT-2000S model) at 150 oC for 30 minutes.
Vulcanisation parameters such as scorch time (ts2), optimum cure time (t90), cure rate
index, etc. are derived from the rheographs obtained from the Moving Die Rheometer
(MDR).
The effect of P-OMMT clay on cure kinetics was further investigated with a differential
scanning calorimeter (DSC), using TA instrument model Q200, at a heating rate of 10
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
o
C/min. under nitrogen atmosphere. DSC thermograms were obtained across the
temperature range from 40-300 oC.
Table 2. Compound formulations for NR/organoclay nanocomposites (NROCN’s)
Compounding NR/organoclay nanocomposites (NROCN’s)
Ingredients, phr NR-gum NROCN4 NROCN4-P NROCN6 NROCN6-P
NR 100 100 100 100 100
OMMT (OC) - 4 - 6 -
P-OMMT - - 4 - 6
ZnO 5 5 5 5 5
Stearic acid 1 1 1 1 1
IPPD a 1 1 1 1 1
Sulphur 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
MBTS b 1 1 1 1 1
a
n-isopropyl-n-phenyl-n-phenylenediamine
b
Mecarptobenzothiazoloe disulphide
Characterisation of NROCN structure
NROCN sheets of 2 mm thickness were prepared by compression moulding at 150 oC
for the optimum cure time (t90) derived from the vulcanisation data. X-ray diffraction
(XRD) analysis of the NROCN vulcanisate materials was performed with a Bruker D8
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
diffractometer at a wave length of 1.54 Å of Cu Kα radiations to evaluate the
organoclay structure with in the NR nanocomposites and to determine the interlayer
spacing of the clay. X-ray diffractograms of compression moulded sheets of the NR
nanocomposite materials were achieved by scanning over a Bragg angle (2θ) range from
1-10 o at a rate of 0.01o/seconds. The conventional Bragg equation (nλ = 2d sin θ) was
used to calculate the interlayer spacing of the clay in the nanocomposite materials. λ is
the wave length of X-rays, d is the crystal lattice spacing, θ is the angle between
incident radiation and the scattering plane, and n is the order of reflection.
Clay dispersion and distribution within the NR nanocomposite vulcanizate materials
was observed under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), model Hitachi SU 6000, at
an acceleration voltage of 10 kV.
Reinforcing effect of organoclay in NR nanocomposite vulcanisates
Solid state mechanical properties of organoclay filled NR nanocomposite vulcanisates
were analysed to evaluate the reinforcement effect of P-OMMT clay on NR compounds
with respect to the NR-gum compound containing no clay. Tensile properties and tear
strength of the NROCN vulcanisates were analysed using Instron, model 3365
Universal Tensometer according to ISO 37: 2005 (E) and ISO 34 -1: 2004 (E) standard
methods respectively. The extension of the samples was measured using a video
extensometer fixed to the Tensometer. NROCN vulcanisate samples was analysed for
shore A hardness using the Bareiss DigiTest hardness meter as ASTM D 2240 standard
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
method whilst rebound resilience was measured using the rebound resilience elasticity
tester as ISO method of 4662-1986 (E).
Results and discussion
Intercalation of PEG oligomer into clay
PEG treated OMMT (P-OMMT) clay containing different weight ratios of PEG (as
shown in Table 1) was characterised with the X-ray diffraction technique to determine
the optimum PEG to OMMT ratio required to achieve the maximum interlayer spacing
between the silicate layers of P-OMMT clay. Figure 1 illustrates the X-ray diffraction
spectra of OMMT and P-OMMT clays. The characteristic d001 diffraction peak of
OMMT is at 3.70 o with an interlayer spacing of 23.8 Å. As shown in Figure 1, when
OMMT was further surface modified with PEG oligomer, all 001 diffraction peaks of P-
OMMT clays (i.e. P-OMMT-1, P-OMMT-2, P-OMMT-3, and P-OMMT-4) were
shifted towards a lower Bragg angle. This implied that the melted PEG molecules had
diffused into the clay galleries during the heat treatment, resulting in a higher interlayer
spacing. The driving force for the diffusion of PEG molecules into the clay gallery is
likely to be the attractive forces between polar groups of PEG and polar sites of the
silicate layers.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectra for OMMT and P-OMMT clays prepared with
different ratio of PEG
However, P-OMMT-1synthesised by melt mixing of 0.25 part of PEG with 1part of
OMMT showed two diffraction peaks overlapping together at 2.95o and 3.70o. The latter
position was similar to the diffraction peak of pure OMMT. This would suggest that P-
OMMT-1 clay is a mixture of OMMT intercalated with PEG and unmodified OMMT
clay. This shows that PEG concentration of 0.25 parts with respect to 1 part of OMMT
is not sufficient to intercalate all organoclay particles. On the other hand, all other P-
OMMT clay (i.e. P-OMMT-2, P-OMMT-3, and P-OMMT-4) containing more than 0.25
parts of PEG showed a single diffraction peak at a lower Bragg angle than the
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
diffraction peak of organoclay (OMMT), indicating that all organoclay was modified
with PEG. However, as shown in Figure 1, if PEG concentration is increased more than
0.5 parts, the interlayer spacing of P-OMMT clay is not further expanded significantly.
This is attributed to the fact that intercalated PEG has reached the saturation and as a
result additional PEG remains outside the clay gallery. Zhu et al. is showed that higher
ratio of PEG/OMMT would not further expand the interlayer spacing due the saturation
of PEG molecules within the clay gallery (Zhua et al., 2013). Based on these X-ray
diffraction results, P-OMMT-2 was chosen as the most suitable clay for the preparation
of NR/organoclay nanocomposites.
P-OMMT clay was further analysed with DSC in the temperature modulation mode to
ascertain the interaction between PEG molecules and OMMT clay platelets. Figure 2
illustrates the DSC traces of PEG and P-OMMT clay samples prepared with different
PEG weight ratios. PEG with an average molecular weight of 4000 mol/g shows the
glass transition temperature (Tg) at -15.90 oC whilst all P-OMMT clay samples show the
Tg values in the range of 14 – 13.3 oC, an increase of about 2 - 2.5 oC. This indicates
that that comparatively a higher energy is required for the onset of molecular motion of
PEG within the P-OMMT clay. Hydroxyl groups of the PEG oligomer are expected to
form hydrogen bonding with the polar sites of the silicate layers and hence the cohesive
energy of intermolecular chains is increased. As a result, PEG, which is confined within
the P-OMMT clay gallery, has a higher Tg compared to that of pure PEG. X-ray
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
diffraction and Tg data suggest that low molecular weight PEG molecules intercalate
into the clay galleries and interact with the clay platelets.
Figure 2. DSC thermograms of PEG and P-OMMT clay samples
Vulcanisation characteristics of NROCN compounds
NR/organoclay compounds prepared according to the formulations shown in Table 2
were analysed to study the effect of organic modification, especially the PEG
modification of clay, on vulcanisation characteristics. Vulcanisation curves of the
NROCN are presented in Figure 3 and vulcanisation parameters such as maximum
torque (MH), scorch time (ts2), curing time (t90), etc., derived from the cure curves are
shown in Table 3.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Figure 3. Vulcanisation curves of the NROCN nanocomposites
All NROCN compounds filled with either OMMT (NROCN4 and NROCN6) or P-
OMMT (NROCN4-P and NROCN6-P) showed a higher maximum torque (MH) and a
higher delta torque (ΔM, torque difference between MH and ML) than that of the NR-
gum compound. In general, ΔM of a NR compound is an indication of the crosslink
density of the compound and the reinforcement achieved with filler (Qureshi and
Qammar,2010; Chakraborty et al., 2010). Torque difference (ΔM) of the
nanocomposites was not remarkably altered with the increase of clay concentration
employed in this study. However, as illustrated in Table 3, NROCN compounds
containing P-OMMT clay have a higher ΔM than the nanocomposites containing
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
equivalent quantity of OMMT clay, demonstrating that NROCN compounds prepared
with P-OMMT clay achieved a higher crosslink density and, therefore, are likely to
have a better reinforcement.
Table 3. Vulcanization characteristics of NROCN containing different
concentrations of OMMT and P-OMMT
Maximum Cure
Nanocomposite torque, Δ Torque Scorch Curing rate
materials MH MH-ML time (ts2) time (t90) index
kgf-cm kgf-cm sec. sec. min-1
NR-gum 6.52 5.23 245 492 24.27
NROCN4 9.06 7.71 76 290 28.09
NROCN4-P 9.62 8.44 58 267 28.73
NROCN6 8.29 7.14 73 313 25.00
NROCN6-P 9.50 8.32 61 305 24.88
NR-gum compound cured with a conventional vulcanisation system as shown in Table 2
exhibited delayed onset of cure as shown from the scorch time (ts2) of 245 sec. along
with a longer optimum curing time (t90) of 492 sec. Addition of either OMMT or P-
OMMT into the NR showed a significant reduction of scorch time and the optimum
cure time; scorch time of NROCN4 is reduced from 245 sec. to 76 sec. whilst optimum
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
cure time is compressed from 492 sec. to 290 sec. As a result, although organoclay
accelerates the vulcanisation reaction as evidenced by higher cure rate index of the NR
nanocomposites (Table 3), processing safety of the NROCN compounds is significantly
reduced with the addition of organoclay. This could mean that organic modification
(dimethyl dihydrogenated tallow quaternary ammonium) of the organoclay acts as an
accelerator for the vulcanisation reaction by reducing the activation energy of the curing
process, resulting in early onset of curing. Lopez-Machado et al. (2004) also reported
that MMT clay containing organic intercalant, especially alkyl ammonium types,
accelerates the vulcanization reaction by forming a complex between the intercalant and
Zn ions. More importantly, when P-OMMT clay was used instead of OMMT clay, the
NROCN compounds (i.e. NROCN4-P and NRLOCN6-P) show further reduction in
scorch time and optimum cure time, suggesting that P-OMMT clay further accelerated
the vulcanisation process. This is achieved in both NROCN4-P and NROCN6-P due to
the fact that PEG modification of OMMT clay enhances the intercalation of rubber
molecules into the organoclay gallery and subsequent exfoliation/uniform dispersion of
clay during the compounding process. The enhanced exfoliation/ delaminating process
of P-OMMT within in the NR matrix would further allow the alkyl ammonium
intercalant ions to participate in the vulcanization process effectively.
Vulcanisation kinetics of NROCN compounds were also evaluated with DSC to further
study the effect of organic modification of montmorillonite clay on curing behaviour of
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
NR. Figure 4 shows vulcanisation exothermic peak of NR-gum compound starts at 176
o
C whereas the vulcanisation exothermic peaks of NROCN4 and NROCN4-P start at
142 oC and 136 oC respectively, showing that the NROCN4-P has the lowest on set of
cure. In contrast to the NR gum compound, both the DSC thermograms of NROCN4
and NROCN4-P show two vulcanisation exothermic peaks overlapping together where
the smaller peak is responsible for lower temperature onset of curing of the NR
nanocomposite compounds. The smaller exothermic peak could be due to the
vulcanisation process initiated by the organic modifier of the organoclay. These
vulcanisation kinetics data obtained from DSC thermograms are in agreement with the
scorch data obtained from rheometric analysis (Table 3) and hence further confirmed
the significant effect of organic modification of the clay on the vulcanisation reaction of
the NR compounds.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Figure 4. DSC vulcanization exothermic thermograms of NROCN’s
Characterization of NROCN structure
Figure 5 presents the X-ray diffraction spectra of NR nanocomposites prepared with
organoclay. The diffraction peaks of all the NROCN vulcanisate materials prepared
with either OMMT or P-OMMT shifted to lower 2θ compared to that of the diffraction
peak of pure organoclay. For example, when NR nanocomposite was prepared with 4
phr of OMMT clay (i.e. NROCN4), the characteristic diffraction peak of OMMT is
shifted from 3.7o to 2.16 o and, as a result, interlayer spacing of OMMT in the NROCN4
was increased up to 40.8 Å compared to the interlayer spacing of pure OMMT of 23.8
Å . However, NROCN4-P vulcanisate material contained the same clay concentration as
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
NROCN4 but with P-OMMT clay showed a further shifting of the diffraction peak
towards a lower Bragg angle of 2.08 o, resulting in a interlayer spacing of 42.4 Å. This
is clear evidence that when pure organoclay (OMMT) is modified with PEG oligomer,
diffusion of rubber molecules along with other low molecular weight substances used in
compounding process is further effective during the melt compounding process because
of the improved compatibility between the NR matrix and the P-OMMT clay.
Carretero-Gonzalez et al. (2008) has also reported that PEG behaves as a dispersing
agent for clay and facilitates the intercalation of rubber molecules into the clay galleries
resulting in improved clay dispersion in the NR matrix.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction spectra of NROCN vulcanisate materials.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Higher interlayer spacing of clay in the NROCN4-P material facilitates the exfoliation
process of the clay within the NR matrix during the high shear melt compounding in the
internal mixer because of the reduced Vander Wall attractive forces resulted due to the
expanded gallery space. Hence, P-OMMT clay particles exfoliate to either single clay
platelets or to smaller clay stacks with a few clay platelets. A similar X-ray diffraction
pattern was shown in NRLOCN6-P vulcanisate material containing 6 phr of P-OMMT
clay in comparison to that of NROCN6 prepared with 6 phr of OMMT. Both diffraction
peaks (001) of NROCN4-P and NROCN6-P vulcanisate materials occur with a lower
intensity than the corresponding nanocomposite materials containing OMMT clay. This
might have been due to the comparatively higher degree of exfoliation achieved with P-
OMMT clay in NROCN vulcanisate materials. Additionally, another diffraction peak at
4.9o of 2θ appears in the NROCN4-P and the NROCN6-P materials. It is likely that un-
modified montmorillonite clay (diffraction peak at 2θ = 6.8 o) which are within the
OMMT clay is intercalated with PEG oligomer and as a result the corresponding peak
has shifted towards a lower Bragg angle.
Since X-ray diffraction data does not provide accurate information on clay dispersion
and distribution within the nanocomposite materials, SEM analysis was also performed
on both NROCN4 and NROCN4-P vulcanisates to evaluate the PEG effect on clay
dispersability and distribution (Figure 6-a and 6-b).
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of natural rubber/organoclay nanocomposites; a.
NROCN4 and b. NROCN4-P
As shown in Figure 6, NROCN4 vulcanizate sample (6-a) contains larger clay particles
and less uniform distribution of OMMT clay within the nanocomposite matrix in
comparison to NROCN4-P (6-b). It clearly shows a significant enhancement of clay
dispersability of P-OMMT clay in the NROCN4-P vulcanisate, resulting in smaller clay
particles/stacks. As a result of improved dispersion and compatibility with NR, uniform
distribution of P-OMMT clay is achieved in the NROCN4-P vulcanizate as shown in
Figure 6-b.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Mechanical properties of NROCN vulcanisate materials
The effect of organoclay (OMMT) and its further modification with PEG on
reinforcement of the NR nanocomposite vulcanisates were evaluated by determining the
tensile properties of the nanocomposite materials.
Figure 7. Stress-strain curves of the NR/organoclay nanocomposites (NROCN)
filled with different loading of OMMT or P-OMMT clay
Figure 7 presents the stress-strain curves of the nanocomposite vulcanisates containing
either OMMT or P-OMMT clay. Tensile properties relevant to stress-strain curves and
other mechanical properties such as hardness tear strength and rebound resilience are
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
shown in Table 4. As clearly illustrated in the stress-strain curves, the highest tensile
properties were shown in P-OMMT clay filled NROCN vulcanisates (NROCN4-P and
NROCN6-P) compared to that of NR-gum vulcanisate and OMMT clay filled NROCN
vulcanisates (NROCN4 and NROCN6). As shown in Table 4, tensile strength and
modulus at 300 % elongation (M300) of NROCN4 vulcanisate were increased by about
26 % and 85 %, respectively whereas the same parameters of NROCN4-P vulcanisate
were increased by about 50 % and 160 %, respectively, with respect to that of NR-gum
vulcanisate, demonstrating the higher reinforcing ability of the P-OMMT clay. This can
be explained by considering the formation ofNROCN4-P material where rubber
molecules are effectively intercalated into the P-OMMT clay galleries and there by clay
particles are exfoliated into clay platelets (which are 1 nm thickness) or smaller stacks
with few clay platelets as confirmed by X-ray diffraction and SEM data (Figures 5 and
6). As a result, the aspect ratio as well as surface area to volume ratio of the clay
platelets/stacks is considerably higher in the NROCN4-P nanocomposite material than
that of the NROCN4 nanocomposite. The increase in specific surface area of clay
platelets/stacks and the improved compatibility between the clay platelets and rubber
molecules through PEG molecules would lead to a stronger interaction between clay
and rubber molecules, resulting in higher tensile properties of NROCN4-P. Kim at al.
(2011) have also shown the effect of PEG on preparation of SBR/organoclay
compounds filled with binary (i.e. organoclay/silica) and tertiary (i.e.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
organoclay/silica/carbon black) filler system and it was observed the enhancement of
modulus at 100 % and 300 % elongation in comparison to the binary and tertiary
particulates filled SBR/organoclay compounds prepared without PEG. These results
were attributed to the improvement in organoclay dispersion within the SBR matrix and
interaction between PEG and organoclay.
Similar to the NROCN4-P vulcanisate material, NROCN6-P vulcanisate containing 6
phr of P-OMMT has better tensile properties (i.e. tensile strength and modulus) than
that of NROCN6 vulcanisate.
Table 4. Mechanical properties of NROCN vulcanisate materials
Tensile Elongation 300% 500 % Tear
Nanocomposite Hardness Rebound
strength at break Modulus Modulus strength
material Shore A resilience
MPa % MPa MPa kN/m
NR-gum 33.0 ±0.6 15.39 ±0.82 769±36 1.23±0.13 2.90±0.42 26.92±1.8 80
NROCN4 43.3 ±1.5 19.39 ±0.96 630±17 2.28±0.21 7.79±1.27 34.70±2.3 79
NRLOCN4-P 45.5 ±0.5 22.93 ±0.74 551±16 3.20±0.16 15.86±1.6 36.67±1.6 82
NROCN6 41.2 ±1.2 16.19 ±1.05 654±18 2.09±0.13 5.92±0.82 28.92±1.4 76
NROCN6-P 43.8 ±1.9 20.72 ±2.62 596±75 2.89±0.06 12.0±2.04 28.02±1.4 79
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
However, when the clay loading is increased from 4 to 6 phr, the tensile properties
showed a slight reduction in the NROCN vulcanisates containing either OMMT or P-
OMMT clay. This could be because of the highest possible degree of exfoliation of clay
is achieved with 4 phr of clay. Any further increase of clay loading would not further
increase the degree of exfoliation and, therefore, clay particles are remained as stacks
with a lower aspect ratio. As a result, higher clay loading would enhance the
intercalated clay structure within the rubber matrix, resulting in slight reduction in
tensile properties. Qu et al.(2009) also observed the similar tensile strength
characteristics with the increase of organoclay loading levels in NR/clay
nanocomposites.
It is well known that natural rubber has a characteristic feature of strain induced
crystallisation. In general, NR molecules start to align towards the stress direction when
it is stretched about 300 % or above and subsequently show comparatively a higher
modules and strength characteristics upon stretching. As evident in stress-strain curves
(Figure 7) and Table 4, NROCN4 vulcanisate material has 7.79 MPa of 500 % modulus
(M500), an increase of about 170 % in comparison to the NR-gum vulcanisate. In
addition, M500 of NROCN4-P was further increased from 7.79 MPa to 15.86 MPa,
indicating a greater effect of P-OMMT clay on strain induced crystallization. This
would suggest that the clay morphology within the rubber nanocomposite materials
plays an important role in achieving strain induced crystallisation. Uniform dispersion
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
of P-OMMT clay at nanoscale would further promote the strain induced crystallisation,
resulting in higher strength characteristics and modulus upon stretching. Recently, Qu at
al. (2009) and Carretero-Gonzalez et al. (2008) have shown a remarkable enhancement
in strain induced crystallisation for organoclay filled NR nanocomposites. However, as
shown in Table 4, NROCN6-P showed a less strain induced crystallisation than
NROCN4-P as measured by M500. This can be explained that degree of exfoliation of
clay in NROCN6-P is comparatively less than that of NROCN4-P and, as a result,
higher percentage of larger clay stacks, which are not nanoscale thicknesses, remained
within the NROCN6-P material. The larger clay stacks, which are similar to
conventional filler, could not promote the strain induced crystallisation.
Tear strength, which indicates the resistance to crack initiation and propagation, of
NROCN vulcanisates showed a similar trend to those of tensile properties; P-OMMT
clay filled NROCN vulcanisates showed a better tear strength than OMMT clay filled
NROCN vulcanisates. Higher degree of exfoliation and enhanced compatibility between
clay and NR achieved in P-OMMT clay filled NROCN’s impart better resistance to
failure under an applied tensile stress. The stress generated at the NR - P-OMMT clay
interface is effectively transferred to the NR bulk and, as a result, resistance to crack
initiation is increased in NROCN materials prepared with the P-OMMT clay.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
Hardness values of the nanocomposite vulcanisates (Table 4), further confirmed that P-
OMMT clay has a better reinforcing capability than OMMT for NR compounds because
of the uniform dispersion of P-OMMT clay in the NR matrix.
Reduction of elasticity as measured with rebound resilience is common in highly filled
NR compounds, especially carbon black filled NR compounds, due to the part of the
deformational energy is dissipated as heat energy. As shown in Table 4, when NROCN
prepared with a lower loading of either P-OMMT or OMMT, the rebound resilience
becomes almost similar to that of the NR-gum vulcanisate, indicating that most of the
deformational energy is stored as elastic energy without dissipating as heat. As a result,
the nanocomposite vulcanisates, particularly the nanocomposites containing P-OMMT
clay, have a similar elastic nature as NR gum vulcanisate.
Conclusion
X-ray diffraction and DSC data revealed that PEG oligomer diffused into the OMMT
clay galleries and interacted with clay layers during the melt mixing process and as a
result, P-OMMT clay has a higher interlayer spacing than the pure organoclay
(OMMT).
Based on the PEG intercalation process, a new preparation method has been
demonstrated for NROCN materials by melt compounding of NR with P-OMMT clay,
with an enhanced degree of exfoliation and uniform dispersion of the clay. The
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
processability studies of the NROCN, evaluated in terms of vulcanization kinetics, have
shown that addition of organoclay accelerates the sulphur vulcanization reaction whilst
early initiation of the onset of curing, resulting in reduced processing safety. A marked
improvement in tensile properties of NROCN vulcanisate material relative to NR-gum
vulcanisate confirms the reinforcing effect of the exfoliated clay platelets/stacks
especially when NROCN is formed with P-OMMT clay. Higher strain induced
crystallization achieved in the P-OMMT clay filled NROCN further confirms a higher
degree of exfoliation and uniform dispersion of P-OMMT clay within the NR matrix.
The NROCN vulcanisate, especially the NR nanocomposite containing P-OMMT clay,
was significantly reinforced with a lower clay loading without compromising the
elasticity of the NR nanocomposite vulcanisate. As a result of the higher degree of
exfoliation and compatibility between clay and NR, the P-OMMT clay, which is
synthesized by the intercalation of PEG oligomer, is a better reinforcing material than
the conventional pure OMMT clay for NR compounds.
Acknowledgements
Authors wish to thank Dr. Nanada Fernando of Loadstar manufacturing division of
Camoplast Solideal, for the support rendered through valuable discussion. Authors are
also grateful to Research & Development unit of Loadstar manufacturing division of
CamoplastSolideal for supplying raw materials and for processing of some samples.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
References
1. Arroyo, M., Lopez-Manchado, M.A.,Herrero, B., 2003. Organo-montmorillonite as
substitute of carbon black in natural rubber compounds.Polymer, 44, 2447-2453.
2.Vaia, R.A., Wagner, H.D., 2004. Framework for nanocomposites.Materialstoday,7,
32-37
3. Tjong, S.C., 2006. Structural and mechanical properties of polymer
nanocomposites.Mater. Sci. and Eng: R:Report. 53(3-7), 73-197.
4. Paul, D.R., Robeson, L.M., 2008. Polymer nanotechnology:
NanocompositesPolymer.49, 3187-3204.
5. Alexandre, M., Dubois, M., 2000. Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites:
Preparation, Properties and Uses of a New Class of Materials. Mater. Sci. and Eng; R:
Reports.28(1-2),1-63.
6. Giannelis, E.P.,Krishnamoorti, R.,Mannias, E., 1999. Polymers in Confined
Environments. Adv. Poly. Sci.138, 107-147
7. Cataldo, F. 2007. Preparation and properties of nanostructured rubber composites
with montmorillonite. Macromolecular Symposium.247, 67-77.
8. Tabsan, N.,Wirasate, S.,Suchiva, K., 2010. Abrasion behaviour of layered silicate
reinforced natural rubber. Wear. 209, 394-404.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
9. Rattanasom, N., Prasertsri. S.,Runangritnumchai, T., 2009. Comparison of the
mechanical properties at similar hardness level of natural rubber filled with various
reinforcing-fillers. Polymer Testing. 28,8-12
10. Sengupta,R.,Chakraborty, S.,Bandyopadhyay, S.,Dasgupta, S.,Mukhopadhyay,
R.,Auddy, A.,Deuri, A.S., 2007. A short review on nanocomposites with emphasis on
mechanical properties. Poly. Eng. and Sci. 1956-1974.
11. Qureshi, M.N.,Qammar, H., 2010. Mill processing and properties of rubber-clay
nanocomposites.Mater. Sci. and Eng.30,590-596.
12. Karger-Kocsis, J., Varghese, S., 2003.Natural rubber-based nanocomposites by latex
compounding with layered silicates.Polymer.44,921-927.
13. Arroyo, M., Lopez-manchado, M.A., Valentin, J.L.,Carretero. J.,2007.
Morphology/behaviour relationship of nanocomposites based on natural
rubber/epoxidized natural rubber blends. Comp. Sci. and Technology. 67,1330-1339.
14. Chakraborty, S.,Kar, S.,Dasgupta. S.,Mukhopadhyay, R.,Bandyopaddhyay, S.,
Joshi, M.,Ameta, S. C., 2010.Study of the properties of in-situ sodium activated and
organo-modifiedbentonite clay-SBR rubber nanocomposites – Part
1:Charactersationand rheometric properties. Polymer Testing. 29(2), 181-187.
15. Lopez-Machado, M. A.,Herrero, B., Arroyo, M.,2004. Organoclay- rubber
nanocomposites synthesised by mechanical and solution mixing methods. Polymer
International. 53(11), 1766-1772.
Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 48(8), 711-727. doi:10.1177/0095244315618698
16. Qu, L., Huang, G., Liu, Z., Zhang, P.,Weng, G., Nic, Y., 2009. Remarkable
reinforcement of natural rubber by deformation-induced crystallisation in the presence
of organophilicmontmorillonite.57, 5033-5060.
17. Carretero-Gonzalez, J.,Verdejo, R., Toki, S., Hsiao, B.S.,Giannelis, E.P., Lopez-
Manchado, M., 2008. Real-time crystallisation of organoclaynano particle filled natural
rubber under stretching. Macromolecules.41, 2295-2298.
18. Shipeng Zhua, Jinyao Chena, Huilin Li, YaCao., 2013. Structure and conformation
of poly(ethylene glycol) in confined space of montmorillonite. Applied Surface Science.
264, 500-506.
19. Carretero-Gonzalez, J., Valentin, J.L., Arroyo, M., Saalwachter, K., Lopz-Machado,
M. A., 2008. Natural rubber/clay nanocomposites: Influence of poly (ethylene glycol)
on the silicate dispersion and local chain order of rubber network. European Polymer
Journal. 44, 3493 – 3500.
20. Wook-soo Kim, Hyun-Jong Paik, Jong-Woo Bae, Wonho Kim, 2011. Effect of
polyethylene glycol on the properties of styrene-butadiene rubber/organoclay
nanocomposites filled with silica and carbon black. Journal of Applied Polymer
Science. 122, 1766-1777.