S&P Uruguay
S&P Uruguay
Overview
                                                                                                        PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYST
- Proactive government health care policies, along with fiscal and liquidity support, should            Constanza M Perez Aquino
  continue to mitigate the economic and social impact of the pandemic on Uruguay.                       Buenos Aires
                                                                                                        + 54 11 4891 2167
- We expect that gradual fiscal correction and stabilizing debt will improve the economic outlook
                                                                                                        constanza.perez.aquino
  for Uruguay.                                                                                          @spglobal.com
- The stable outlook balances short-term economic and fiscal setbacks with an expected                  Manuel Orozco
                                                                                                        Sao Paulo
  recovery in GDP growth, along with a solid external position and well-established institutions.
                                                                                                        + 55 11 3039 4819
                                                                                                        manuel.orozco
                                                                                                        @spglobal.com
                                                                                                        Joydeep Mukherji
On April 20, 2021, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BBB' long-term and 'A-2' short-term foreign
                                                                                                        New York
and local currency sovereign credit ratings on Uruguay. The outlook on the long-term ratings
                                                                                                        + 1 (212) 438 7351
remains stable.
                                                                                                        joydeep.mukherji
                                                                                                        @spglobal.com
The transfer and convertibility assessment remains 'A-'.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects our view that economic recovery and corrective fiscal policy will
contribute to reversing the near-term deterioration in the sovereign's fiscal and debt profiles from
the COVID-19 pandemic, limiting the long-term negative impact on its finances.
Downside scenario
We could lower the ratings on Uruguay over the next two years if lower-than-expected long-term
growth prospects, which depend partly on advancing important investment projects, limit the
government's ability to correct fiscal deficits and reverse the near-term erosion in public finances.
In this scenario, the already high general government deficit and net general government debt
burden could continue to rise beyond our expectations. Moreover, a sustained weaker long-term
growth trajectory could dampen Uruguay's per capita income, weakening its economic resilience
and leading to a lower rating.
Upside scenario
A sustained decline in inflation, along with further deepening of local capital markets, could
facilitate the government's ongoing efforts to increase the share of local currency in its debt stock.
Falling exposure to foreign-currency-denominated debt could reduce the impact of exchange rate
fluctuations on the sovereign's balance sheet. The resulting improvement in debt dynamics, along
with continued GDP growth, could lead to a higher rating over the next two years. We could also
raise the ratings if a combination of good GDP growth and greater-than-expected fiscal
consolidation measures narrows the fiscal deficit and decreases the government's debt burden
beyond our current expectations.
Rationale
Our ratings on Uruguay are supported by its track record of moderate and predictable economic
policies and its well-established institutions, which have underpinned consistent economic
growth for over 15 years. The ratings also benefit from Uruguay's strong external position and
reflect the sovereign's per capita GDP of an estimated US$16,500 in 2021, the highest in Latin
America.
Uruguay's persistently high fiscal deficits and debt burden are constraints on the sovereign
ratings, as are its relatively high inflation and still-high dollarization in the financial system.
- We expect broad political consensus on key economic policies to remain, which will be key to
  implementing needed structural measures.
- Uruguay's strong checks and balances and low perceived corruption, which sustain investor
  confidence in the country, continue to support economic outcomes.
We expect real GDP to increase 3.2% in 2021 and average just over 2.5% in 2022-2024, following
the 5.9% drop in 2020 as a result of the pandemic and weakened global and regional demand.
Recovery in external demand and higher commodity prices will contribute to the rebound in the
short term, as well as gradual recovery in consumption and steady progress in Uruguay's
vaccination program. At the same time, recovery in key sectors such as tourism will be slower due
to COVID-19-related restrictions and high dependence on recovery in Argentina and Brazil.
We estimate Uruguay's GDP per capita at US$16,500 in 2021, up from US$15,400 in 2020, which
compares favorably to regional peers. At the end of 2020, Uruguay made a national accounts
revision that resulted in higher GDP figures by about 8%, while growth rates in some years were
more sluggish than previously estimated.
Uruguay has been growing consistently over the past 15 years. However, growth had recently
decelerated to 0.9% on average in 2015-2019 from 4.9% over 2010-2014. The stagnation was
because of deceleration in consumption, in part due to unemployment levels and persistently high
inflation, as well as lower public and private investment. Investment by Finland-based forest and
paper company UPM-Kymmene Corp. for US$3 billion (5% of GDP) is expected to fully start
operations in 2023. The project, and related infrastructure projects with US$1 billion in
investments, will have a positive impact on economic growth, employment, and balance of
payments over the next couple of years.
We believe Uruguay's broad political consensus and its stable and well-established institutions
have anchored--and will continue to anchor--economic stability. Uruguay continues to have a
vibrant democracy and ranks high in global institutional quality rankings. Institutional strength
sustains investor confidence in the country despite adverse economic and political events in
neighboring Argentina and Brazil. Uruguay is a largely middle-class society with a relatively strong
social contract that emphasizes consensus and social cohesion.
The administration of President Luis Lacalle Pou took office in 2020 with a plan to contain
government spending through nonrenewal of public employment vacancies, cuts in
administration, and measures to improve efficiency and governance of public-sector companies.
The pandemic refocused priorities to the short term. Following a generally quiet 2020 in terms of
cases, the country experienced its first wave of COVID-19 in mid-November. There was no
countrywide lockdown during the pandemic, although social-distancing measures were promoted
and movement restrictions were put in place. Fiscal and monetary authorities announced
measures focused on the more vulnerable sectors and on providing support to small businesses.
Measures to inject liquidity into the financial sector were also introduced.
On July 9, 2020, Congress approved the Law of Urgent Consideration, with just over 500 articles
covering different areas. It included the creation of a fiscal rule that was incorporated in the
budget for 2020-2024, as well as a committee to recommend reforms to the social security
system--discussions are at a preliminary stage, but we expect the process to conclude in 2022.
We believe this signals commitment to addressing structural weaknesses in public finances. At
the same time, we expect fiscal consolidation will be only gradual, given high unemployment
following this year's economic slump and structural rigidities that will limit the ability of the
government to make substantial adjustments in 2021 and 2022.
- We expect a moderate surplus of the current account on average over 2021-2023, sustaining
  Uruguay's balanced external position.
- Our base case assumes inflation will remain above the central bank target range in the next
  couple of years.
We expect the general government fiscal deficit will gradually lower to 3%-4% of GDP over
2022-2024 from a peak of 5.1% in 2020 (or 5.7% excluding one-off revenue from the pension
system) as economic growth contributes to higher revenue, while temporary spending measures
are scaled back and the administration continues to focus on generating additional savings in
non-COVID-19 items. Our definition of general government debt includes the central bank and
excludes public-sector enterprises.
In late 2017, Congress approved changes to the social security system enabling certain groups of
future retirees in private pension plans to return to the public-sector pension system. This
resulted in one-off revenue for the government over 2018-2021. While this revenue lowers the
general government deficit, it does not change the government's financing needs because the
funds that it receives due to the shift are deposited in a ring-fenced trust.
Government countercyclical support totaled 2.3% of GDP in 2020, made up of 1.3% of GDP in
fiscal measures and 1% government guarantees for small and midsize enterprise loans. While
support was comparatively limited, this was partly explained by the quality of health services and
social security coverage, as well as already-high debt.
Net general government debt increased by 10 percentage points to 65.9% of GDP in 2020 from
56.8% in 2019. Half of the rise was due to adverse exchange rate movements (almost 55% of debt
is denominated in foreign currency). Our base case assumes net general government debt will
stabilize around 65% of GDP on average over 2021-2024 due to expected gradually decreasing
fiscal deficits along with foreign currency depreciation. We estimate an increase in net general
government debt of about 6.6% in 2021, which, as in 2020, we consider extraordinary, with
underlying increases in debt of around 4.7% over 2022-2024. We expect the central bank of
Uruguay's debt, typically issued for open-market operations in response to changes in the foreign
currency market, to remain at about 10% of GDP over this period. We expect general government
interest payments to average 7.7% of general government revenue between 2021 and 2024.
We expect the government to continue to meet its overall financing needs mainly through local and
international bond issuance. The government's main source of funding in 2020 was bond
issuances in the international and local market, of which 90% was in local currency. At the same
time, existing and new contingent credit lines with multilaterals were called upon, especially at
the onset of the pandemic and amid some market volatility.
The government implements active prefunding policies; its current liquid assets and credit lines
with multilaterals cover debt service obligations over the next 12 months. In recent years, Uruguay
accumulated ample external liquidity to manage potential financing disruptions, which
represented about 4% of GDP as of 2019. Liquidity buffers as of year-end 2020 included
contingent credit lines for a total of US$1.7 billion (3% of GDP) with multilateral institutions (World
Bank, Corporación Andina de Fomento, and Fondo Latinoamericano de Reservas), as well as
government liquid assets, for a total of about 5% of GDP as of December 2020. While the strategy
of prefunding amortization payments by holding substantial liquid assets provides insulation
against Uruguay's external vulnerabilities, it also has a fiscal cost.
Effective debt management has significantly reduced the risks embedded in Uruguay's debt
profile. This is reflected in the central government's debt management milestones, which show
that average maturities have continued to increase and are now 13.5 years, from eight years in
2005. About 95% of the central government debt is at a fixed rate, compared with 78% 14 years
ago, and bonds compose 88% of central government debt, while loans make up 12%.
Inflation closed at 9.4% in 2020 and has remained above the target set by the central bank for the
past 10 years (with the exception of 2017). While accumulated inflation moderated to 8.3% in
March, expectations over the next 12 months remain above the central bank target range of
3%-7%.
The government changed the monetary policy instrument back to interest rates in September
2020 (rate is currently 4.5%) after using monetary aggregates since June 2013. The central bank
has been focused on anchoring expectations through increased communication and transparency
with the market and especially with business chambers. We expect inflation to fall in the coming
years, although depreciation of the Uruguayan peso and pass-through effects to the tradable
sector, as well as recovering demand and potential increases in tariffs from higher oil prices, could
pose challenges.
High inflation and still-high dollarization continue to limit Uruguay's monetary policy flexibility.
They also pose risks to the financial sector, should there be potential sudden spikes in the
exchange rate. Over 50% of resident loans are denominated in dollars, while more than 70% of
resident deposits are denominated in dollars.
Despite the high dollarization, the Uruguayan banking system has remained relatively healthy and
resilient thanks to financial institutions' strong liquidity and capital starting point, and measures
from the central bank that provided additional liquidity. Regulation since the 2002 crisis aimed at
strengthening the balance sheet and avoiding currency mismatches contributed to a better
standing in the face of COVID-19.
Asset quality metrics remained stable. Nonperforming loans were of 1.9% for private banks and
4.5% for development bank BROU as of December 2020, in line with previous years. We classify
Uruguay in group '6' of our Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment, or BICRA (see "Banking
Industry Country Risk Assessment: Uruguay," published Aug. 3, 2020). BICRAs are grouped on a
scale from '1' to '10', ranging from what we view as the lowest-risk banking systems, or group '1',
to the highest risk, or group '10'.
Uruguay's external sector has remained balanced despite unfavorable regional and global
conditions. We expect moderate deficits in the current account over 2021 and 2022 and slightly
positive results in 2023 and 2024 as the services sector fully recovers and the beginning of
production of the cellulose plant in 2023 provides a boost for exports (per estimations from the
company, it would add US$1.1 billion in exports).
Gross external financial needs should remain below 100% of current account receipts (CAR) plus
usable reserves in 2021, then fall to 85% of GDP by 2024. We expect narrow net external debt to
hover around 30% of CAR, similar to previous years. We expect the government to continue to
finance part of the fiscal deficit with external sources through bond issuance and multilateral
institution loans. At the same time, CAR is set to recover as global demand and commodity prices
contribute to higher goods exports, while services exports recover at a slower pace. Uruguay has
been financing half of its central government deficit abroad over the past couple of years.
Key Statistics
Table 1
Uruguay--Selected Indicators
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Nominal GDP (bil.   1,445.38 1,581.55 1,726.41 1,842.00 1,982.24 2,158.73 2,253.12 2,499.62 2,760.18 3,013.08 3,260.93
LC)
Nominal GDP (bil.     62.18      57.87    57.24    64.23   64.52    61.23    53.63    57.60    60.87    63.89    66.49
$)
GDP per capita            18.3    16.9     16.6     18.6    18.6     17.7     15.4     16.5     17.4     18.3     19.0
(000s $)
Real GDP growth 3.2 0.4 1.7 1.6 0.5 0.4 (5.9) 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1
Real GDP per               2.9    (0.4)     1.3      1.3     0.3      0.4     (6.2)     2.9      2.9      2.2      1.9
capita growth
Real investment            2.4    (9.2)    (1.6)     0.4    (9.0)     0.8     (0.5)     6.0     (2.0)    (2.0)     0.0
growth
Table 1
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Investment/GDP 19.0 17.6 17.5 16.1 15.4 15.0 17.0 17.4 16.5 15.8 15.4
Savings/GDP 16.0 17.4 18.2 16.1 14.9 16.4 16.5 17.1 16.9 18.1 18.1
Exports/GDP 29.6 28.3 27.0 26.1 26.4 27.8 25.4 26.9 28.5 29.2 30.6
Real exports                3.5     (0.6)    (0.2)      4.9     (1.7)     3.6    (16.2)    10.0     10.2      5.3       7.4
growth
Unemployment                6.6      7.5      7.8       7.9      8.6      9.2     10.5      9.5      9.0      8.7       8.1
rate
Current account            (3.0)    (0.3)     0.7      (0.0)    (0.5)     1.3     (0.6)    (0.3)     0.4      2.3       2.7
balance/GDP
Current account            (9.1)    (0.8)     2.6      (0.1)    (1.8)     4.3     (2.0)    (0.9)     1.3      7.0       8.0
balance/CARs
CARs/GDP 32.4 30.9 29.3 29.1 29.6 31.0 27.7 29.5 31.8 32.5 33.9
Trade                       3.0      2.3      3.6       3.1      3.6      5.0      4.1      4.3      3.2      5.1       6.1
balance/GDP
Net FDI/GDP (3.6) (1.3) 3.2 3.2 0.8 (2.0) (4.9) (0.2) 0.6 (0.2) (0.5)
Net portfolio              (0.4)     2.1      3.0      (2.8)    (2.4)     2.2      2.9      0.0      0.0      0.0       0.0
equity inflow/GDP
Gross external             96.9     93.6    100.5     104.1     91.3     86.6     97.7     92.5     92.1     87.4      85.1
financing
needs/CARs plus
usable reserves
Narrow net                 30.4     35.7     35.3      23.6     28.4     33.8     28.5     26.7     26.1     23.7      15.3
external
debt/CARs
Narrow net                 27.9     35.4     36.2      23.6     27.9     35.3     27.9     26.4     26.4     25.5      16.6
external
debt/CAPs
Net external               96.8    104.4    110.2      89.8     92.6     90.1    102.7     90.7     84.3     77.3      64.7
liabilities/CARs
Net external               88.7    103.5    113.1      89.7     91.0     94.2    100.7     89.9     85.4     83.1      70.3
liabilities/CAPs
Short-term                 36.7     43.8     48.1      42.1     38.3     34.1     42.7     39.8     35.0     32.6      30.1
external debt by
remaining
maturity/CARs
Usable                      5.6      6.5      5.5       4.4      6.3      6.3      5.7      6.2      5.5      5.6       5.7
reserves/CAPs
(months)
Usable reserves           9,754    7,508    6,844    10,183    9,465    7,150    8,882    8,720    9,058    9,779    10,578
(mil. $)
Balance/GDP (2.6) (3.2) (2.2) (3.3) (3.5) (4.2) (5.1) (4.3) (3.5) (3.5) (3.4)
Change in net               4.7      5.6      2.9       7.9      6.0      7.0     11.6      6.6      4.9      4.7       4.6
debt/GDP
Table 1
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Primary                      (0.2)       (0.1)         0.7        (0.4)        (0.4)       (1.7)        (2.3)       (1.5)        (0.8)       (0.8)        (0.7)
balance/GDP
Revenue/GDP 32.5 33.0 33.3 35.3 36.6 35.6 35.0 35.5 36.0 35.7 35.7
Expenditures/GDP 35.2 36.3 35.5 38.5 40.1 39.9 40.2 39.8 39.5 39.2 39.1
Interest/revenues 7.6 9.4 8.7 8.2 8.2 7.1 8.2 8.0 7.7 7.6 7.6
Debt/GDP 52.0 55.1 53.1 57.1 59.2 60.6 71.4 70.3 68.5 67.5 67.0
Debt/revenues 159.9 166.9 159.6 161.9 161.7 170.1 203.7 197.8 190.4 188.9 187.6
Net debt/GDP 46.3 47.9 46.8 51.8 54.2 56.8 65.9 66.0 64.7 64.0 63.8
Liquid assets/GDP 5.7 7.3 6.3 5.3 5.0 3.8 5.4 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.2
CPI growth 8.3 9.4 8.1 6.6 8.0 8.8 9.4 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0
GDP deflator                  9.4          9.0         7.3          5.0         7.1          8.5        10.9          7.5         7.0          6.5         6.0
growth
Exchange rate,             24.33        29.87       29.26        28.76       32.39        37.34       42.34        44.46       46.24        48.08       50.01
year-end (LC/$)
Banks' claims on             18.0        22.3          1.2          0.5        11.6        10.7         10.3          8.0         9.9          9.0         9.0
resident non-gov't
sector growth
Banks' claims on             25.7        28.7         26.6        25.1         26.0        26.4         27.9        27.2         27.1        27.0         27.2
resident non-gov't
sector/GDP
Foreign currency             N/A          N/A         N/A          N/A         N/A          N/A         N/A          N/A         N/A          N/A         N/A
share of claims by
banks on
residents
Foreign currency             77.7        80.9         77.3        73.3         73.6        76.2         77.4        77.4         77.4        77.4         77.4
share of residents'
bank deposits
Real effective               (3.9)         0.6         0.9          6.1         1.5        (3.2)        (5.3)        N/A         N/A          N/A         N/A
exchange rate
growth
Sources: None.
Adjustments: None.
Definitions: Savings is defined as investment plus the current account surplus (deficit). Investment is defined as expenditure on capital goods, including plant,
equipment, and housing, plus the change in inventories. Banks are other depository corporations other than the central bank, whose liabilities are included in
the national definition of broad money. Gross external financing needs are defined as current account payments plus short-term external debt at the end of
the prior year plus nonresident deposits at the end of the prior year plus long-term external debt maturing within the year. Narrow net external debt is defined
as the stock of foreign and local currency public- and private-sector borrowings from nonresidents minus official reserves minus public-sector liquid claims on
nonresidents minus financial-sector loans to, deposits with, or investments in nonresident entities. A negative number indicates net external lending.
N/A--Not applicable. LC--Local currency. CARs--Current account receipts. FDI--Foreign direct investment. CAPs--Current account payments. The data and
ratios above result from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings'
independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information.
Table 2
Institutional assessment                     3 Stable democracy, predictable policies, free press, and peaceful changes of
                                               government. No external threats. Largely middle-class society with consensus on
                                               key economic policies. Policymaking during the past 15 years has remained
                                               generally effective. Strong institutional checks and balances, low perception of
                                               corruption, and respect for the rule of law.
Economic assessment                          3 Based on GDP per capita (US$) and growth trends as per Selected Indicators in
                                               table 1. We estimate GDP per capita growth over our forecast period will be in line
                                               with that of countries with similar levels of development.
External assessment                          2 Based on narrow net external debt and gross external financing needs/(CAR +
                                               usable reserves) as per Selected Indicators in table 1.
Fiscal assessment:                           5 Based on the change in net general government debt (% of GDP) as per Selected
flexibility and performance                    Indicators in table 1 and the use of paragraph 164 of our "Sovereign Rating
                                               Methodology" applied for years 2020 and 2021. We estimate the underlying
                                               increase in net general government debt (% of GDP) excluding one-off events at
                                               around 4%-5%.
Fiscal assessment: debt                      4 Based on net general government debt (% of GDP) and general government
burden                                         interest expenditure (% of general government revenue) as per Selected Indicators
                                               in table 1.
Monetary assessment                          5 The Uruguayan peso is a free-floating currency with central bank intervention in
                                               foreign-exchange markets. CPI as per Selected Indicators in table 1. The central
                                               bank has a track record of independence and has the ability to act as lender of last
                                               resort for the financial system.
                                                 Resident deposits/loans in foreign currency account for more than 50% of the
                                                 total.
Notches of supplemental                      0
adjustments and flexibility
Final rating
Notches of uplift 0
Local currency BBB Default risks do not apply differently to foreign currency and local currency debt.
S&P Global Ratings' analysis of sovereign creditworthiness rests on its assessment and scoring of five key rating factors: (i) institutional
assessment; (ii) economic assessment; (iii) external assessment; (iv) the average of fiscal flexibility and performance, and debt burden; and (v)
monetary assessment. Each of the factors is assessed on a continuum spanning from 1 (strongest) to 6 (weakest). S&P Global Ratings'
"Sovereign Rating Methodology," published on Dec. 18, 2017, details how we derive and combine the scores and then derive the sovereign
foreign currency rating. In accordance with S&P Global Ratings' sovereign ratings methodology, a change in score does not in all cases lead to a
change in the rating, nor is a change in the rating necessarily predicated on changes in one or more of the scores. In determining the final rating
the committee can make use of the flexibility afforded by §15 and §§126-128 of the rating methodology.
Related Criteria
- Criteria | Governments | Sovereigns: Sovereign Rating Methodology, Dec. 18, 2017
- General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings, April 7, 2017
Related Research
- Sovereign Ratings History, March 10, 2021
- Credit Conditions Emerging Markets Q2 2021: Brighter Prospects Prone To Setbacks, March 31,
  2021
- Uruguay 'BBB/A-2' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable, April 30, 2020
In accordance with our relevant policies and procedures, the Rating Committee was composed of
analysts that are qualified to vote in the committee, with sufficient experience to convey the
appropriate level of knowledge and understanding of the methodology applicable (see 'Related
Criteria And Research'). At the onset of the committee, the chair confirmed that the information
provided to the Rating Committee by the primary analyst had been distributed in a timely manner
and was sufficient for Committee members to make an informed decision.
After the primary analyst gave opening remarks and explained the recommendation, the
Committee discussed key rating factors and critical issues in accordance with the relevant
criteria. Qualitative and quantitative risk factors were considered and discussed, looking at
track-record and forecasts.
The committee's assessment of the key rating factors is reflected in the Ratings Score Snapshot
above.
The chair ensured every voting member was given the opportunity to articulate his/her opinion.
The chair or designee reviewed the draft report to ensure consistency with the Committee
decision. The views and the decision of the rating committee are summarized in the above
rationale and outlook. The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in
this rating action (see 'Related Criteria And Research').
Ratings List
Ratings Affirmed
Uruguay
Local Currency A-
Uruguay
   Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors,
   have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such
   criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings
   information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating
   action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search
   box located in the left column.
Copyright © 2021 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
    No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any
    part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or
    retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The
    Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers,
    shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the
    Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results
    obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is”
    basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF
    MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT
    THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE
    CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive,
    special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and
    opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such
    damages.
    Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are
    expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not
    recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any
    security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on
    and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making
    investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While
    S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due
    diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons
    that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a
    credit rating and related analyses.
    To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for
    certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole
    discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as
    well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
    S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their
    respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P
    has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each
    analytical process.
    S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors.
    S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,
    www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means,
    including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at
    www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.