Scribd
Upload
75 views17 pages

Output Kualitas Hidup

The document contains frequency tables analyzing various demographic data: - 83.3% of respondents were female, 16.7% were male - 76.7% of respondents were between 13-18 years old, 23.3% between 8-12 - 100% of respondents reported being compliant with their medication - Additional frequency tables analyze education levels, income levels, insurance status, physical/emotional/social functioning, and quality of life Crosstabs and chi-square tests analyze relationships between gender/age and quality of life, finding no significant relationships. Compliance with medication showed no relationship to quality of life.

Uploaded by

ramot
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75 views17 pages

Output Kualitas Hidup

The document contains frequency tables analyzing various demographic data: - 83.3% of respondents were female, 16.7% were male - 76.7% of respondents were between 13-18 years old, 23.3% between 8-12 - 100% of respondents reported being compliant with their medication - Additional frequency tables analyze education levels, income levels, insurance status, physical/emotional/social functioning, and quality of life Crosstabs and chi-square tests analyze relationships between gender/age and quality of life, finding no significant relationships. Compliance with medication showed no relationship to quality of life.

Uploaded by

ramot
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Frequencies

Frequency Table

Jenis kelamin

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Laki-laki 5 16.7 16.7 16.7
Perempuan 25 83.3 83.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

Usia

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 8 - 12 7 23.3 23.3 23.3
13 - 18 23 76.7 76.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

Patuh minum obat

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Patuh 30 100.0 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Bekerja 30 100.0 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan orang tua

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tinggi 11 36.7 36.7 36.7
Rendah 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

Pendapatan orang tua

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid > 2,5 jt 3 10.0 10.0 10.0
< 2,5 jt 27 90.0 90.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Asuransi

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Punya 30 100.0 100.0 100.0

F. Fisik

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 19 63.3 63.3 63.3
Buruk 11 36.7 36.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

F. Emosional

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 17 56.7 56.7 56.7
Buruk 13 43.3 43.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

F. Sosial

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 18 60.0 60.0 60.0
Buruk 12 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

F. Sekolah

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
Buruk 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

Kualitas hidup

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 15 50.0 50.0 50.0
Buruk 15 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Crosstabs

Jenis kelamin * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Jenis kelamin Laki-laki Count 3 2 5
Expected Count 2.5 2.5 5.0
% within Kualitas hidup 20.0% 13.3% 16.7%
Perempuan Count 12 13 25
Expected Count 12.5 12.5 25.0
% within Kualitas hidup 80.0% 86.7% 83.3%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .240b 1 .624
Continuity Correctiona .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .241 1 .623
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear
.232 1 .630
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Jenis
kelamin (Laki-laki / 1.625 .230 11.464
Perempuan)
For cohort Kualitas
1.250 .548 2.849
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
.769 .247 2.400
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
Usia * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Usia 8 - 12 Count 3 4 7
Expected Count 3.5 3.5 7.0
% within Kualitas hidup 20.0% 26.7% 23.3%
13 - 18 Count 12 11 23
Expected Count 11.5 11.5 23.0
% within Kualitas hidup 80.0% 73.3% 76.7%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .186b 1 .666
Continuity Correctiona .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .187 1 .666
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear
.180 1 .671
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Usia
.688 .125 3.786
(8 - 12 / 13 - 18)
For cohort Kualitas
.821 .321 2.104
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
1.195 .553 2.582
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
Patuh minum obat * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Patuh minum obat Patuh Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 30
a. No statistics are computed because
Patuh minum obat is a constant.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Patuh a
.
minum obat (Patuh / .)
a. No statistics are computed because
Patuh minum obat is a constant.
Pekerjaan * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Pekerjaan Bekerja Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 30
a. No statistics are computed
because Pekerjaan is a constant.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for a
.
Pekerjaan (Bekerja / .)
a. No statistics are computed
because Pekerjaan is a constant.
Pendidikan orang tua * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Pendidikan Tinggi Count 9 2 11
orang tua Expected Count 5.5 5.5 11.0
% within Kualitas hidup 60.0% 13.3% 36.7%
Rendah Count 6 13 19
Expected Count 9.5 9.5 19.0
% within Kualitas hidup 40.0% 86.7% 63.3%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.033b 1 .008
Continuity Correctiona 5.167 1 .023
Likelihood Ratio 7.459 1 .006
Fisher's Exact Test .021 .010
Linear-by-Linear
6.799 1 .009
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
Pendidikan orang tua 9.750 1.592 59.695
(Tinggi / Rendah)
For cohort Kualitas
2.591 1.264 5.313
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
.266 .073 .966
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
Pendapatan orang tua * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Pendapatan > 2,5 jt Count 1 2 3
orang tua Expected Count 1.5 1.5 3.0
% within Kualitas hidup 6.7% 13.3% 10.0%
< 2,5 jt Count 14 13 27
Expected Count 13.5 13.5 27.0
% within Kualitas hidup 93.3% 86.7% 90.0%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .370b 1 .543
Continuity Correctiona .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .377 1 .539
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear
.358 1 .550
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
Pendapatan orang .464 .037 5.749
tua (> 2,5 jt / < 2,5 jt)
For cohort Kualitas
.643 .125 3.318
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
1.385 .568 3.374
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
Asuransi * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
Asuransi Punya Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 30
a. No statistics are computed
because Asuransi is a constant.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for a
.
Asuransi (Punya / .)
a. No statistics are computed
because Asuransi is a constant.
F. Fisik * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
F. Fisik Baik Count 12 7 19
Expected Count 9.5 9.5 19.0
% within Kualitas hidup 80.0% 46.7% 63.3%
Buruk Count 3 8 11
Expected Count 5.5 5.5 11.0
% within Kualitas hidup 20.0% 53.3% 36.7%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.589b 1 .058
Continuity Correctiona 2.297 1 .130
Likelihood Ratio 3.690 1 .055
Fisher's Exact Test .128 .064
Linear-by-Linear
3.469 1 .063
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for F.
4.571 .903 23.137
Fisik (Baik / Buruk)
For cohort Kualitas
2.316 .831 6.450
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
.507 .254 1.011
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
F. Emosional * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
F. Emosional Baik Count 12 5 17
Expected Count 8.5 8.5 17.0
% within Kualitas hidup 80.0% 33.3% 56.7%
Buruk Count 3 10 13
Expected Count 6.5 6.5 13.0
% within Kualitas hidup 20.0% 66.7% 43.3%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.652b 1 .010
Continuity Correctiona 4.887 1 .027
Likelihood Ratio 6.946 1 .008
Fisher's Exact Test .025 .013
Linear-by-Linear
6.430 1 .011
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for F.
8.000 1.522 42.042
Emosional (Baik / Buruk)
For cohort Kualitas hidup
3.059 1.082 8.644
= Baik
For cohort Kualitas hidup
.382 .173 .846
= Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
F. Sosial * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
F. Sosial Baik Count 12 6 18
Expected Count 9.0 9.0 18.0
% within Kualitas hidup 80.0% 40.0% 60.0%
Buruk Count 3 9 12
Expected Count 6.0 6.0 12.0
% within Kualitas hidup 20.0% 60.0% 40.0%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.000b 1 .025
Continuity Correctiona 3.472 1 .062
Likelihood Ratio 5.178 1 .023
Fisher's Exact Test .060 .030
Linear-by-Linear
4.833 1 .028
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
00.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for F.
6.000 1.172 30.725
Sosial (Baik / Buruk)
For cohort Kualitas
2.667 .949 7.492
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
.444 .214 .923
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
F. Sekolah * Kualitas hidup

Crosstab

Kualitas hidup
Baik Buruk Total
F. Sekolah Baik Count 11 2 13
Expected Count 6.5 6.5 13.0
% within Kualitas hidup 73.3% 13.3% 43.3%
Buruk Count 4 13 17
Expected Count 8.5 8.5 17.0
% within Kualitas hidup 26.7% 86.7% 56.7%
Total Count 15 15 30
Expected Count 15.0 15.0 30.0
% within Kualitas hidup 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.995b 1 .001
Continuity Correctiona 8.688 1 .003
Likelihood Ratio 11.876 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .003 .001
Linear-by-Linear
10.629 1 .001
Association
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
50.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for F.
17.875 2.734 116.877
Sekolah (Baik / Buruk)
For cohort Kualitas
3.596 1.480 8.738
hidup = Baik
For cohort Kualitas
.201 .055 .740
hidup = Buruk
N of Valid Cases 30
Logistic Regression

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Model Summary

-2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke


Step likelihood R Square R Square
1 17.502a .552 .736
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

Kualitas hidup Percentage


Observed Baik Buruk Correct
Step 1 Kualitas hidup Baik 12 3 80.0
Buruk 1 14 93.3
Overall Percentage 86.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)


B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Step
a
F.Fisik 3.778 2.085 3.282 1 .070 43.729 .734 2604.823
1 F.Emosi 2.976 1.680 3.139 1 .076 19.607 .729 527.450
F.Sos 2.782 1.560 3.179 1 .075 16.148 .759 343.730
F.Sekul 3.280 1.614 4.132 1 .042 26.577 1.125 628.051
Constant -18.296 7.472 5.996 1 .014 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: F.Fisik, F.Emosi, F.Sos, F.Sekul.
Tabel deskriptif data
Variabel F %
Jenis kelamin
Laki-laki 5 16,7
Perempuan 25 83,3
Usia
8 – 12 7 23,3
13 – 18 23 76,7
Patuh minum obat
Patuh 30 100
Tidak patuh 0 0
Pekerjaan
Bekerja 30 100
Tidak bekerja 0 0
Pendidikan orang tua
Tinggi 11 36,7
Rendah 19 63,3
Pendapatan orang tua
> 2,5 juta 3 10,0
< 2,5 juta 27 90,0
Asuransi
Punya 30 100
Tidak punya 0 0
Faktor fisik
Baik 19 63,3
Buruk 11 36,7
Faktor emosional
Baik 17 56,7
Buruk 13 43,3
Faktor sosial
Baik 18 60,0
Buruk 12 40,0
Faktor sekolah
Baik 13 43,3
Buruk 17 56,7
Kualitas hidup
Baik 15 50,0
Buruk 15 50,0
Tabel karakteristik terhadap kualitas hidup
Kualitas Hidup
Variabel Baik Buruk p OR IK 95%
n % n %
Jenis kelamin
Laki-laki 3 20 2 13,3 0,500£ 1,625 0,23 – 11,46
Perempuan 12 80 13 86,7
Usia
8 – 12 3 20 4 26,7 0,500£ 0,688 0,13 – 3,79
13 – 18 12 80 11 73,3
Patuh minum obat
Patuh 15 100 15 100 – – –
Tidak patuh 0 0 0 0
Pekerjaan
Bekerja 15 100 15 100 – – –
Tidak bekerja 0 0 0 0
Pendidikan orang tua
Tinggi 9 60 2 13,3 0,008¥* 9,750 1,59 – 59,70
Rendah 6 40 13 86,7
Pendapatan orang tua
> 2,5 juta 1 6,7 2 13,3 0,500£
< 2,5 juta 14 93,3 13 86,7
Asuransi
Punya 15 100 15 100 – – –
Tidak punya 0 0 0 0
Keterangan : * Signifikan (p < 0,05); ¥ Pearson chi square; £ Fisher’s exact

Tabel Faktor-faktor Kualitas Hidup terhadap Kualitas Hidup


Kualitas Hidup
Variabel Baik Buruk p OR IK 95%
n % n %
Faktor fisik
Baik 12 80 7 46,7 0,058¥ 4,571 0,90 – 23,14
Buruk 3 20 8 53,3
Faktor emosional
Baik 12 80 5 33,3 0,010¥* 8,000 1,52 – 42,04
Buruk 3 20 10 66,7
Faktor sosial
Baik 12 80 6 40 0,025¥* 6,000 1,17 – 30,73
Buruk 3 20 9 60
Faktor sekolah
Baik 11 73,3 2 13,3 0,001¥* 17,88 2,73 – 116,9
Buruk 4 26,7 13 86,7
Keterangan : * Signifikan (p < 0,05); ¥ Pearson chi square
Tabel hasil uji regresi logistik faktor kualitas hidup terhadap kualitas hidup
Variabel p OR IK 95% Keterangan
Faktor fisik 0,070 43,729 0,73 – 2604,8 Tidak signifikan
Faktor emosi 0,076 19,607 0,73 – 527,45 Tidak signifikan
Faktor sosial 0,075 16,148 0,76 – 343,73 Tidak signifikan
Faktor sekolah 0,042 26,577 1,13 – 628,05 Signifikan

You might also like