0% found this document useful (0 votes)
415 views5 pages

Argument Essay 1

The document argues that mandatory recycling has many benefits and should be required in the US. It claims that mandatory recycling could reduce air pollution by 20-95% by reducing emissions from landfills and incinerators. It also asserts that recycling creates more jobs than waste disposal. Additionally, the document argues that recycling saves natural resources like trees and water. While some argue it infringes on civil liberties, the document likens it to mask mandates as a precaution that benefits public health and the environment. Overall, the document concludes that the benefits of cleaner air, more jobs, and preserved resources outweigh any downsides to making recycling mandatory nationwide.

Uploaded by

api-549207860
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
415 views5 pages

Argument Essay 1

The document argues that mandatory recycling has many benefits and should be required in the US. It claims that mandatory recycling could reduce air pollution by 20-95% by reducing emissions from landfills and incinerators. It also asserts that recycling creates more jobs than waste disposal. Additionally, the document argues that recycling saves natural resources like trees and water. While some argue it infringes on civil liberties, the document likens it to mask mandates as a precaution that benefits public health and the environment. Overall, the document concludes that the benefits of cleaner air, more jobs, and preserved resources outweigh any downsides to making recycling mandatory nationwide.

Uploaded by

api-549207860
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Carey 1

Alanna Carey

Prof. Goeller

Eng 1101

23 November 2020
Mandatory Recycling- Yea or Nay?

How many people choose to recycle? How many people choose to throw

everything away? There are many cities in the USA where citizens do not have a

choice. That is right, there are places where recycling is mandatory. The people living in

those cities do not have a say in this law, and, yes, technically, it may violate their civil

rights. However, this may not be as horrible as it seems. Recycling profits the US and

its citizens, and making recycling mandatory would be a very good choice. Mandatory

recycling has a multitude of benefits that will help create a cleaner, healthier America.

Mandatory recycling may reduce the amount of pollution released into the air.

There are many people who state the fact that recycling produces air pollution, which is

true. The process of recycling does produce a tiny bit of air pollution, however, landfills

and incinerators also pollute the air. Landfills produce methane gas and incinerators fill

the air with smoke and harmful toxins. Recycling may produce some air pollutants, but it

mainly helps the earth. For example, “manufacturing glass from recycled materials

reduces air pollution by 20 percent, and using recycled aluminum and paper can reduce

air pollution by 95 percent” (Bratcher). This shows that there could be a drastic

difference in the amount of air pollution if recycling was made mandatory.

Recycling can also produce more jobs. Currently, the average recycling rate is

about 34%. If that measly 34% was brought up to 75%, it would result in approximately

1.5 million more jobs (Bratcher). Also, “waste disposal generates the fewest jobs per ton
Carey 2

of waste at 0.1 jobs per 1,000 tons of waste, while recycling generates 2 jobs per 1,000

tons” (Bratcher). This means that recycling creates about twenty times more jobs than

waste disposal. With more jobs available, more people have an opportunity to provide

for their families.

Additionally, recycling helps save natural resources, such as trees and water

supplies. Trees, a large factor in many products, are beneficial and important to the

environment. They provide oxygen, they produce shade, and they dispense rich

nutrients into the soil. If people recycle an item made from trees, such as paper or

cardboard, it can be reused over and over again. However, if people just throw those

things away, more trees will need to be cut down to provide extra materials the next

time someone needs something that is made from trees. A good deal of water goes into

the production of paper, in fact, it takes ten liters of water to make just one sheet of

paper (Paper Making). That means that it cost about 2,630 liters of water just to make

the “English Composition at Sinclair” textbook. When people do not recycle things that

use water in their production, they are wasting the limited amount of water on this

planet. “Each ton (2000 pounds) of recycled paper can save 17 trees, 380 gallons of oil,

three cubic yards of landfill space, 4000 kilowatts of energy, and 7000 gallons of water.

This represents a 64% energy savings, a 58% water savings, and 60 pounds less of air

pollution” (USI). While trees and water are renewable, there is a high chance of running

out of non-renewable resources, such as oil, if people do not start doing something to

save them. Recycling is a good place to start.

Nevertheless, there are some things about recycling that are not so wondrous.

First of all, items that are made from recycled parts are generally more expensive. For
Carey 3

example, an item with non-recyclable plastic packaging often costs less than the same

thing with eco-friendly, recyclable packaging. Also, recycling sometimes wastes time.

“Seattle Public Utilities researchers (in collaboration with University of California, Davis)

conducted a survey in 2005 that indicated 98 percent of Seattle households participate

in the curbside recycling program, and that 16 minutes are spent recycling per

household. The city contains 260,000 households, which means each week Seattleites

spend almost 8,500 work days recycling.” (Thayer) However, sixteen minutes is not

much time out of a twenty-four hour day. Also, if recycling is made mandatory and

people are forced to recycle, some may claim that it undermines civil liberties. But is it

really wrong? Masks were made mandatory in the state of Ohio, and some may argue

that is also a violation of civil rights, but it is a precaution to protect others. Recycling is

not much different! It will help with people’s health, since it makes the air cleaner, and it

is also just a common courtesy. If people are required to wear a mask when entering a

store, then it is not too much to require people to recycle.

In conclusion, the pros of recycling definitely outweigh the cons, and it would be

a good choice to make recycling mandatory. If all of America’s population recycled, it

would make a drastic difference! The air would be much clearer, because most of the

toxins produced by landfills and incinerators would be gone, and it might even help

reduce global warming. Although the air in the USA is already fresh, it could be so, so

much cleaner if some of the processes that produce harmful air pollution are reduced. If

more citizens of America recycled, it could help America create new jobs and lower the

unemployment rate. Also, recycling is good morally. If a person recycles because they

love the earth, and they watch what kind of things they buy, such as whether the item is
Carey 4

recyclable or not, then that person impacts the earth greatly. Everyone should care

about the earth, and one of the ways of showing their feelings is by recycling. It is sad

that many people in this country do not recycle, but if recycling is made mandatory, then

maybe more people will realize the significance of recycling. Mandatory recycling has a

multitude of benefits that will help American citizens create a better environment to live

in. So, should recycling be made mandatory in the USA? Yes it should.
Carey 5

Works Cited

“Paper Making: What Makes Paper Production Such a Wasteful Process?”

Paper / on the Rocks, 22 Mar. 2019, paperontherocks.com/2019/03/22/water-

waste-paper-industry-what-makes-pulp-paper-production-thirsty-

business/#:~:text=The%20average%20amount%20of%20water. Accessed 24

Nov. 2020.

Bratcher, Rory. “Recycling Vs. Landfills or Incinerators.” Sciencing, 25 Apr. 2017,

sciencing.com/recycling-vs-landfills-incinerators-23884.html. Accessed 23 Nov.

2020.

Thayer, James. “Mandatory Recycling Wastes Resources.” Weekly Standard, edited by

Margaret Haerens, 25 Jan. 2006. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints,

link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010301232/OVIC?

u=dayt30401&sid=OVIC&xid=a9ee9dd2. Accessed 23 Nov. 2020.

USI Web Services. “Paper Recycling Facts - University of Southern Indiana.”

Usi.Edu, 2000, www.usi.edu/recycle/paper-recycling-facts/. Accessed 2 Dec.

2020.

You might also like