Correspondence
Theory of the                                                   Orin                                          necessary modification of Ridley’smodel.
                                                                Velocity                                      The details of such rate limitations have not
Gunn Effect                                                                                                   been worked out but one consequence that
     Gunn [I] has recently discovered a new                                                                   can be readily predicted is that thethreshold
 kind of current oscillations a t microwave                                                                   fieldwill increase with decreasing sample
 frequencies, in n-type GaAs and InP. In his                                                                  length, in order to accomplish the distribu-
 paper, Gunn discusses several possibleex-                                                                    tion change along the shorter available dis-
 planations for these oscillations. Most of                                                                   tance. This dependence, too, has been ob-
 these explanations he rejects outright; about                                                                served.
 the remainder he has serious reservations.                                                                                            HERBERT KROEMER
     The purpose of this correspondence is to                                                                                             Varian Associates
 point out that most, if not all, of the known                                                                                             Palo Alto, Calif.
 properties of theGunn effect can be ex-                              EL     EP             E”
 plained, a t least qualitatively, if it is as-                                                                                   REFERENCES
 sumed that these semiconductors havea                                            Fig. 1.                     [ l ] J. B. Gunn. “Iptabilities of current in 111-V
                                                                                                                    semiconductors. I B M J . Res. & Dm..vol. 8 . pp.
 negative differential bulk conductivity                                                                            141-159;April 1964.
 above the oscillation threshold field and that                                                               [ZI B. K. Ride; “Specific negative resistance in
                                                                                                                    solids.” Proc.’Phys. Soc., vol. 82. pp. 954-966;
 the current oscillations are due to the     pe-           through the negative mobility range for a                1963.
 riodic nucleation and disappearance of                    finite distance, near the electrodes. As           [31 H. Krcemer. to be oublished.
                                                                                                              141 W. Shocklev, ‘Negative resistance arising from
 traveling space-charge instability domains,               Shockley [4] has pointed out, such an over-              transit time in semiconductor diodes Bell. Sys.
 of the kind discussed by Ridley [2].1                     simplified treatment of the boundary condi-              Tech. J . , v d . 33, PP. 799-826; July. lb54.
     Assume that the drift velocity vs field
 behavior is characterized by a negative dif-
                                                           tions may lead to profound errors in prob-
                                                           lems of this sort. Some form of instability is,
                                                                                                              t51 G. F. Day. personal communicatlon.
                                                                                                               61 B. K. Ri,dey and T. B. Watkins. “The possibility
                                                                                                                    of negatlve resistance effects in semiconductors.”
                                                           therefore, likely to remain in these high-field          Prw. Phys. Soc., zol. 78, PP. 293-304; 1961.
 ferential mobility range as in Fig. 1. Ridley                                                                [’I] H. Ehrenreich. Band structure and electron
  [2] has shown that acrystalcannot           be           cases, although it is not likely to have the             transport of GaAs.” Phyr. Rm.,vol. 120, pp. 1951-
                                                                                                                    1963. December 1%0.
 biased stably in that range but that it will              form of strong coherent transit-time oscilla-      181 C. ,Hilsum, ‘Transferred electron amplifiers and
 break up into domains of lower and higher                 tions. All of this is consistent with the work           oaclllatms “ PRW. IRE. v d . 50. pp. 185-189;
                                                                                                                    February.’l%2.
 fields, corresponding to the points L and V               of Day [SI of this laboratory, who succeeded
 in Fig. 1, and that these domains will travel             in strongly attenuating existing oscillations
 with a velocity equal to the drift velocity               by increasing the field strength.
UL of the carriers. As one high-field domain                   Another refinement necessary in Ridley’s
 moves out of the crystal a t the positive elec-           model is the fact that space-charge limita-
 trodea new domain gets nucleated a t or                   tions prevent the domain walls from being
 near the negative end. In sufficiently short              arbitrarily thin, particularly a t the electron-
samples only one nucleation center willbe                 depleted positive end of the high-fielddo-
active, leading to coherent oscillations, with             main, where the space-charge density cannot
a frequency approximately equal to V L / L ,              exceed the donor space charge. For a suffi-         RF Characteristics of Thin Dipoles
where L is the sample length. A detailed in-               ciently low net donor density the domain
                                                          wall thickness exceeds the sample length                 In theabove paper 111 Mackand Reiffen
vestigation [3] shows that the frequency is                                                                   give an analysis of scattering by dipoles
somewhat larger than this value and that it               and no domains are possible. If one assumes
                                                          a difference between low and high fields of a       whichis fundamentally in error,although
increases slowly with increasing voltage, in                                                                  their results are approximately correct. I t
agreement with Gunn’s observations.                       few thousand volts per cm, this occurs when
                                                          the product of net donor density and sample         is the purpose of this communication to call
     The terminal current associated with                                                                     attention to the correct formulation, and to
such domain travel oscillates between the                 length is less than a few times 1010 cm-’.
                                                          This was also observed by Day [SI.                  show to what extent the formulas of Mack
values corresponding to the valley velocity                                                                   and Reiffen apply.
and to thethreshold value, also in agreement                   LVe wish to suggest that theorigin of the
                                                          negative differential mobility is Ridley and             Theerror lies in the identification of
with the observations, if one assigns Gunn’s                                                                  power “dissipated” in aThevenin equiv-
low current limits to the valley drift veloc-             Watkins’ mechanism [6] of electron transfer
                                                          into the satellite valleys that occur in the        alent circuit with reradiated power. A little
ity.                                                                                                          thought shows that thiscannot generally
     Such a field-controlled bulk-type nega-              conduction bands of both GaAs and InP.
                                                          Gunn [ l ] has rejected this mechanism on the       be true, since an open-circuited antenna
tive conductance cannot be stabilized by                                                                      would then scatter no field.   Also     what
loading it with a sufficiently low impedance,             grounds that the energy separation of the
                                                          satellite valleys would require electron tem-       justification would one have for using the
in contrast tothe interface-type negative                                                                     Thevenin equivalent over the     Norton
conductance of a single Esaki tunnel diode.               peratures of the order of 4000’K, while the
                                                          experimental electron temperature a t 80 per        equivalent?This would give diametrically
It behaves essentially like a large number of                                                                 opposite predictions as to reradiated power.
series-connected tunnel diodes. This isin                 cent of the threshold fieldis only of the
                                                          order of 400’K. However, thisargument               In general, no identification of a power dis-
agreement with Gunn’s observation that it                                                                     sipated in an equivalent circuit can be
is impossible to stabilize the current a t the            overlooks the fact that the   combined density
                                                          of states of the six (100) satellite valleys is     made.
low value.                                                                                                        The correct formulation for scattering
                                                          about 400 times that of the main valley [7].
     According to Ridley’s simple model the               Hilsum [8] has considered this fact and has         by antennas was first given by Y. Y. Hu
domains, and  thereby
                   the             oscillations,          estimated avelocity peak field of 3000 v/cm,        for center-loaded dipoles [2], and this was
should disappear if fieldsinexcess       of the           an electron temperature a t this field of only      later generalized to arbitrary antennas [3],
valley field are applied. However, Ridley’s               about 670°K, and of only about 530’K a t             [4]. The exact formulation for an antenna
model does not take into account       the fact           80 per cent of the peak field, all values for       loaded by an impedance Z L yields an echo
that, even in this case, the field must pass              the already high lattice    temperature        of   area [4].
                                                          373’K, with lower values for lower tempera-
                                                          tures.
    Manuscript received October 14 1964.                      Such drastic changes in electron distribu-
    1 Ridley himself hints at this pokibility in “Elec;
tric bubbles and the quest for negative resistance,       tion are, of course, notinstantaneous          in
N n v Scicnfisf. vol. 22. pp. 352-355; May, 1964.         either time or space. This indicates a third            Manuscript received June 23.1964.
                                                                                  1736