SCOM 425 Final Exam
Answer the questions posed using theories and concepts from our class. Make sure you
underline or bold the concepts and explanations – similar to how you did it on the
midterm exam.
   1. When is calling a culture “toxic” appropriate? How bad do things need to be to
       earn that label?
   In this case for Franklin Climate Systems, I believe they needed to fix things a while
ago, but unfortunately, they are in a tough position and have to address many problems
within the company. Noelle is the type boss who cares too much about the bottom line.
She doesn’t think about the company as a whole including the people, culture,
efficiently, and profitability. Bad news for the company, Noelle has only been focusing
on the profits and has not showed care to her employees. You can see how bad it is
when we get to Marshall and Noelle’s conversation. Marshall is far gone from being a
positive leader in Little Rock and he’s only bringing the rest of his division down with his
attitudes and behavior. Noel should’ve never let it get to this, but here she is trying to fix
it. Circling back to our question, I believe this is a perfect example of when it is time to
call a culture toxic. When you have your supervisors, like Marshall, reporting to you that
people are quitting or at least threatening to quit, you need to take a hard look around
your organization. However, as we learned from our readings, toxic followership can
come from toxic leadership. I think a better question is how do you confront a toxic
leader. In my mind Noelle does fit the criteria for being a toxic leader. She hasn’t shown
care to her employees so why should they care and put effort into their job. Noelle’s
actions have set her company way back in terms of being a well running organization.
While she still has a chance to save her organizations culture and employees, this is
indeed a toxic work culture.
   2. Is Joss right in saying that getting rid of toxic people won’t change the culture?
      Why or why not?
   I believe Joss is right and wrong in this situation. I think this, because when you’re in
an environment and a culture that is toxic it takes a leader to change the perception of
the group. It is up to someone to step up and lead an organization out of the toxic
culture. While there will be some toxic people that need individual help, the main goal is
to make the organization the most efficient place to get work done and make a profit,
and have people enjoy what they do. A leader must do all they can in order to change
their toxic culture, in the case of Noelle, she doesn’t want to lose more employees and
have the possibility of going bankrupt. Noelle must do everything she can for her
company to get back on track and have an efficient workforce at her hands again. She
needs to gain their trust back and fix what has become a depressing work environment.
Listening to Joss and bringing in an expert could really help move things back on track.
Now if all else fails and you did everything to try to improve your culture and
environment, yet you still have toxic people, then I think it would be valid to remove
them from the company in order to restore the best culture you can.
   3. Should Noelle support the layoffs or advocate for culture change? Justify your
      answer by aligning it with the leadership theory you think is most consistent with
      your approach to leadership. Your answer should demonstrate command of the
      leadership theory and its implications for how you should proceed in this
      situation. (this should be your longest and most in-depth answer)
If I was in this position, I would firstly try to turn around the company’s culture and make
it an efficient workplace yet again. It will be tough and it won’t happen overnight, but
showing your employees that you’re willing to change and put in the effort, it might just
rub off on them too. While it makes sense to lay off workers who seem toxic or are
helping contribute to the toxic environment, it would be better to try and solve the
problem then avoid it. Since Noelle and her team at Franklin have had rocky couple of
years with “belt-tightening and turnover, it would be in their best interest to try and get
the company’s culture back on track.
       I would firstly suggest having a companywide meeting to address new standards
and rules due to the problems with-in the company and let the employees know you
hear them and are listening. That Franklin is dedicated to turning around the
atmosphere of negativity. I would then visit each separate plant and assess the
damages of the culture and have an expert consultant who is there to better the culture.
Bringing in an outside hire might help identify the problems behind the cracks. Joss was
right when she said, “it’s not the people who are toxic, it’s the culture”. Since money has
been tight spending it on something that is there to help bring employee satisfaction
back might send a strong message to employees that times are starting to change for
the better. Since Noelle was too narrowed in on making the company run no matter
what, she lost sight of the whole picture. We have learned from class you have to keep
workers motivated and hungry for their next challenge. To bring back energy and
community into the workplace, Franklin needs to bring back benefits. This can only
happen when the company is making great quotas, so starting it slow might just be the
kick start Franklin needs. Marshall made a great point of how benefits can bring a
company more together. If these strategies do not seem to help, then conducting
particular layoffs might clear the culture of the toxicity. Joss was also correct when
pointing out that if there was another round of layoffs, before trying to fix the culture,
would there be anyone left there that actually has trust in the company? When a culture
becomes toxic you can only face it head on and deal with the consequences. For
instance, maybe it’s time for Franklin to look at a new CFO, bringing in one new leader
who could possibly affect the entire organization for the better. Our whole semester has
been about leadership, so when I started to try and come up with solutions, one that
seemed like a good possibility is removing the head of the snake. If Noelle was the one
focused too much on making her profit, then she’s the blame for poisoning her workers.
Noelle seems to mean good, so if she could have a chance to start a clean slate with
her employees, she better take the chance.