AIR 2000 SC 1650
Lily Thomas v. Union of India,
AIR 2000 SC 1650
ROUGH DRAFT SUBMITTED IN THE FULFLIMENT OF THE COURSE TITLED
FAMILY LAW
SUBMITTED TO:
Mrs. Pooja Srivastava
Research Associate/Teaching Assistant
SUBMITTED BY:
NAME -UJJAWAL KUMAR
COURSE–BBA.LLB(HONS)
ROLLNO–2437
SESSION-2020-2025
Semester 2
CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, PATNA
NYAYA NAGAR, PATNA, 800001
1
AIR 2000 SC 1650
ABSTRACT
This Project Concerns in itself the case of Lily Thomas v. Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 1650:. It
is and IRAC analysis of the aforesaid case. This case is on the principles against the practice of
solemnizing second marriage by conversion to Islma, with first marriage not being dissolved,
followed by Hindu husbands, which were carved in the famous case of Sarla Mudgal v. Union of
India.
Here, in the projects facts are briefly stated, issues are raised with relevance to the laws applied
in the case, and analysis of the judgment followed by a conclusion.
2
AIR 2000 SC 1650
CHAPTERS
Introduction to the Project
Introduction to the Case
Laws
Case Comment
Conclusion
REFRENCES
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
This project is written as a review of the much-celebrated case Lily Thomas v. Union of India, AIR 2000
SC 1650: 2000 CrLJ 2433: 2000 AIR SCW 1760: 2000 (1) BLJ 53.
3
AIR 2000 SC 1650
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS
This project is limited to the subject and issues of the case that is to be reviewed.
Various other cases have been referred to for supporting the arguments stronger.
Relevant parts of the judgment have been extracted. All the works and cases referred
to in this paper have been properly cited and are related to the case
Sarla Mudgal v.Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 1531.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS (ISSUES)
This project will answer the following cases:
1. Does India need a Uniform Civil Code for all its citizens?
2. Whether a Hindu husband, married under Hindu law, by embracing Islam,
can solemnize second marriage?
3. Whether the apostate husband would be guilty of the offence under Section
494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
METHOD OF WRITING
This project has used F-IRAC (Facts, Issues, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) approach for reviewing the case
in hand.
4
AIR 2000 SC 1650
INTRODUCTION
The case that we discuss today is a landmark judgment in the legal history of India. The case
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India & Ors is landmark due to the fact that in this case SC considered
second marriage without prior divorce from the first marriage to be void wherein men were
converting their religion to Islam to solemnize the second marriage but all of this was considered
void unless and until first marriage was dissolved according to the Hindu Marriage Act otherwise
the husband would be liable for bigamy under section 494 and 495 of Indian Penal Code.
This was because converting to Islam would not dissolve the first marriage and the Husband is
liable to all the obligations as he would be prior converting to Islam. Such a judgment was
important since men were taking recourse to such conversion for marrying and having more than
one wife. Bigamy is the offence of marrying another while the first marriage still persists and
such bigamous relations are illegal and the second marriage is void ab initio.
For a long period, married men whose personal law did not allow bigamy have been recurring to
the unhealthy and immoral practice of converting to Islam for the interest of condensing a second
bigamous marriage underthe assumption that such conversion would help them to marry again
without getting their first marriage dissolved. Mrs. SushmitaGhosh v. Union of India and Ors,
Smt. SarlaMudgal, President ,Kalyani and others v. Union of India and Ors, Sunita &Fatima v.
Union of India and Ors these petitions were collectively taken by SC to decide the status of
bigamous marriage by converting to Islam.
5
AIR 2000 SC 1650
REFRENCES
1. Lily Thomas and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. (05.04.2000 – SC) :
MANU/SC/0327/2000
2. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/80351/
3. http://lawtimesjournal.in/lily-thomas-vs-union-of-india-ors/
4. [1] https://indiankanoon.org/doc/635068/