0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views3 pages

Tax Implications for Lease Agreements

Mike leased his land to Leomar for two years beginning July 1, 2018 at a monthly rental of P100,000. Leomar paid rent through October 2018 and then defaulted for the rest of the year. Under the accrual method, Mike's income for 2018 is P600,000 which represents the full rental amount for the two year lease period. Under the cash method, Mike's income for 2018 is P400,000 which represents the rental amounts received through October 2018 before Leomar defaulted.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views3 pages

Tax Implications for Lease Agreements

Mike leased his land to Leomar for two years beginning July 1, 2018 at a monthly rental of P100,000. Leomar paid rent through October 2018 and then defaulted for the rest of the year. Under the accrual method, Mike's income for 2018 is P600,000 which represents the full rental amount for the two year lease period. Under the cash method, Mike's income for 2018 is P400,000 which represents the rental amounts received through October 2018 before Leomar defaulted.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

84. Mike leased his land to Leomar for two years beginning July 1, 2018.

Leomar would pay monthly


rental of

P100,000. He paid rent up to October 2018 and then defaulted for the rest of the year. Under accrual
method,

how much was the income of Mike for 2018?

a. P200,000

b. P400,000

c. P600,000

d. None of the choices

 Based on collections, regardless of accounting method used.

85. Using the same data in the preceding number, under cash method, how much was the income of
Mike in 2014?

a. P200,000

b. P400,000

c. P600,000

d. None of the choices

86. Under accrual method, how much was the deductible expense of Leomar in 2018?

a. P600,000

b. P400,000

c. P200,000

d. None of the choices

87. Under cash method, how much was the deductible expense of Leomar in 2041?

a. P600,000

b. P400,000

c. P200,000

d. None of the choices

B
88. Pedro leased his lot to Jose. The contact calls for Jose to construct a house which would serve as a
residence of

the latter, the ownership thereof to be transferred to Pedro after the expiration of the lease. When the
house was

completely constructed, the remaining term of the lease was 10 years. The residential house had an
estimated

useful life of 15 years. What is the tax implication of the leasehold improvement?

a. Pedro derives taxable income on the improvement; Jose can claim depreciation expense as a
deduction from the gross

income.

b. Pedro derives taxable income on the improvement; Jose cannot claim depreciation expense as a
deduction from the

gross income.

c. Pedro does not derive taxable income on the improvement; Jose cannot claim depreciation expense
as a deduction

from the gross income.

d. Pedro does not derive taxable income on the improvement; Jose can claim depreciation expense as a
deduction from

the gross income.

/etd

 Jose cannot claim depreciate expense because of the point of view of Jose , the improvement is a
personal asset

(pertaining to his house), therefore, any depreciate in relation to the improvement is non-deductible.

 Pedro will derive an income because the ownership of the property will be transferred to him upon
expiration of

the lease term.

89. Assume the same facts in the immediately preceding number, except that at the time of the
completion of the

residential house, the remaining term of the lease was 15 years while the useful of the house was 10
years. What

is the tax implication of the leasehold improvement?


a. Pedro derives taxable income on the improvement; Jose can claim depreciation expense as a
deduction from the gross

income.

b. Pedro derives taxable income on the improvement; Jose cannot claim depreciation expense as a
deduction from the

gross income.

c. Pedro does not derive taxable income on the improvement; Jose cannot claim depreciation expense
as a deduction

from the gross income.

d. Pedro does not derive taxable income on the improvement; Jose can claim depreciation expense as a
deduction from

the gross income.

 Jose cannot claim depreciate expense because of the point of view of Jose, the improvement is a
personal asset

(pertaining to his house), therefore, any depreciate in relation to the improvement is non-deductible.

 Pedro will not derive an income because the useful life of the improvement is shorter than the lease
term. Thereof

, upon termination of the lease, there is no more improvement to be transferred to Pedro.

You might also like