Catechism: I. of The One, or God
Catechism: I. of The One, or God
1. What is God?
The principle beyond all being, beyond all participation, totally imparticipable and transcendent,
beyond all knowledge, unmoved in the singularity of its own unity, is the always ineffable One,
which is also the Good. Laying in ultimate repose, all things exist because of the ineffable One,
though that One is beyond all things.
God, the One, although singular, may be understood, so far as it can be understood, triadically,
all contained within itself transcendentally and immanently throughout the realms and cosmos.
The entirely ineffable One (Gk: pantelos arrheton) beyond all being is also expressed as the
simply One (Gk: ho haplos hen), that which is before duality (Gk: pro tos duados). The simply
One is active where the ineffable exists in its own repose. Finally the One exists as the One-
Existent or One-Being (Gk: to hen on). Here the One in all its ways exists beyond being, beyond
life and beyond mind. All these come from the One but the One is beyond them. As the senses of
the physical body cannot grasp nor even perceive the realities of the mind, as image cannot take
hold in what is absolutely simple and shapeless, and as the bodily cannot approach the
incorporeal so too is the mind incapable of gazing upon that which is beyond intellect and beings
are to be found inferior to that which is infinitely prior to being.
If God is the ultimate and true reality, participating in nothing, prior and superior to everything
else, then the answer is “No.” That other, emanated and posterior intelligibles, participating in
the One may also be called gods then the answer is “Yes.” Also, the three-fold Demiurgos may
also be called god, though it is lesser than the One.
The One, is neither male nor female, masculine nor feminine. The ineffable One and the simply
One exist being multiplicity, symbolized by the dyad called Limit and Unlimited or One and
Many. Though the One-Existent manifests after the dyad it is still beyond being, essence, duality,
and the Forms from which male and female take their shape.
5. If the One is beyond sex and gender, what language may be used to describe It?
Though the One is beyond such distinctions, frequently our human languages are not. As such,
where the Divine has revealed itself through the Demiurgos, deities, daimons, and other spiritual
beings, humans have taken up language appropriate to their understanding of those revelations.
Such language, gendered as it may be, can be used to discuss God, knowing that it reflects a
human understanding of the One. As the One manifests itself in different ways in different
cultures God may be spoken of using gendered and non-gendered terminology.
While the One may be spoken of in a positive manner, that is to say “the One is this,” the One
may also be spoken of in an apophatic or negative manner, as taught by the writer known as
Dionysius the Areopagite. Apophatic theology recognizes that the One is beyond all things and
so positive descriptive language fails to fully describe the One. Ultimately, we can say nothing
about the One; it is neither “this” nor “not this” nor “not not this.”
7. If the One may be spoken of apophatically, why use positive language at all?
It is through a combination of positive and negative language that the entirety of the One may be
understood, so far as the One as possible, for the One encompasses and exists in all things and is
beyond all things.
No. Because the One has manifested itself through various cultures and given itself Names
according to the understanding of those cultures, divine Names are symbols or tokens of divine
reality and are not simply subjective terms for a limited human understanding of God. As such,
those Names contain noetic power capable of raising human souls beyond their current state.
This practice is part of what known as theourgia, “theurgy,” or “god-working.”
9. Besides the fullness of the One beyond being, what other realms exist?
Reality consists of the Triadic Pre-Essential One that is God, three primary hypostases or
underlying states; the realm (Gk: kosmos) of the divine mind, called the intellectual or noetic
realm, the intellective or noeric realm, and the realm of the divine soul, called the psychic realm;
and finally the perpetual cosmos. There is also a noetic-noeric realm in between the first two
hypostases.
Each realm is emanated from the One. As God expresses itself in three ways, each realm consists
of three “moments,” ways in which the divine reality at that level is expressed. The first moment
is the hypostasis in its purest form, existing as itself. The second as that hypostasis is participated
by beings of a lower level. The third as that hypostasis is reflected in those lower beings. These
three levels are called “unparticipated” (Gk: amethektos), “participated” (Gk: metachomenos)
and “in participation” (Gk: kata methexin), respectively.
The noetic, or intellectual, realm is the first hypostasis after the One. At its height is the pre-
essential Demiurge. The noetic realm consists of three “intellectual triads,” from which extend
the principles of being, life and mind.
The first consists of the the pre-essential Demiurge, also called Aion or Eternity, from which, as
a reflection of the One-Existant into the noetic realm, comes the primary quality of Being. Being
gives the desire to participate in causes. Life grants us movement towards more excellent
natures. Mind is a conscious perception of the goodness of causes. Before this triad there is no
being, life or mind in which lower entities may participate.
The second intelligible triad, in the noetic-noeric realm, consists of the primary quality of Life.
The final triad, in the noeric realm, contains the primary quality of Mind.
No. Being is the most basic quality, and all thing which exist have being. However, not all thing
that exist live, and not all living things have reason, the primary quality of mind.
Intelligible refers to that which can be apprehended by the intellective mind. The intellective can
be understood as the activity of the mind which grasps or apprehend the intelligables, the pure
divine thoughts, of the noetic realm.
The psychic realm is cosmos of the divine soul, just as the noeric realm is the cosmos of the
divine mind and the noetic realm the cosmos of the gods or divine beings.
At the highest level of the psychic realm resides the participated intellectual Mind, Nous itself, in
the form of the Whole or Hypercosmic Soul. This is followed by the participated encosmic or
World Soul and finally Souls in participation, individual souls, which connect the psychic realm
with the natural cosmos within which reside physical beings. Souls in participation, in the
perpetual cosmos, manifest as individual souls.
The Whole Soul is a reflection of the celestial Demiurge into the psychic realm. The World Soul
was created by the Demiurge in the psychic realm. Individual rational souls were likewise
created by the Demiurge while irrational souls were created by divinities posterior to the
Demiurge, under His guidance.
Like all things and beings, the natural cosmos was emanated by the One.
No. Instead the cosmos, through the psychic, noeric, and noetic realms, participates in God.
Yes, the power and activity of all superior beings extends to the depths of creation. Therefore the
One is in the cosmos, though it is also beyond the cosmos.
The cosmos consists of matter (Gk: hule), a word that originally meant “wood” or “timber.”
Hulē is not matter as commonly understood, i.e. physical material with shape. Instead it is
analogous to Plato’s chora, the receptive space of the Timaeus. This means that hule is not
shaped material but the receptacle for the divine Forms that give matter its shape.
27. If the cosmos is good and the Good extends to all beings, why is there evil in the world?
Because the Good is in all things and because the Demiurgos, the fashioner of the cosmos,
desires good for all within its preview, evil cannot be understood as a positive thing, something
with being, life or mind. Instead evil is a lack of good, just as darkness is a lack of light.
28. If the Good extends to all things, and Being, Life and Mind move us towards that which is best,
how can any being do evil?
Because evil is not a positive thing, but negative, people do not do evil for evil’s sake. Instead
evil is done in an attempt to achieve some good. Because all beings participate in the Good to
varying degrees and not uniformly, we may err about the Good and so do evil in place of good.
A being’s separation from their monad, their “leader god,” can lead to error due to lack of
perfection. Thus individual souls are more likely to err than daimons, which are much closer to
their monad, the gods and divine intelligibles. The divine intelligible are monads, and therefore
free from error as is the pre-essential Demiurgos. Mistaking a particular good for the Good can
also lead to error.
Spiritual beings are those that have their origins in the noetic realm. They are above the realm of
generation and so are never born and never die.
No. Some exist prior to Being, such as the pre-essential Demiurgos. Some have Being but exist
prior to Life and Mind, such as the gods or divine intelligibles. Some have Being and Life but
exist prior to Mind, such as the angels and archangels. Others, such as human souls, have Being,
Life and Mind. That such beings are called “beings” is a matter of convenience of the language
and does not necessarily indicate the presence of Being.
The number of spiritual beings, though finite, is beyond measure. They form a chain of being
from the deepest depths of the cosmos to the highest heights of the noetic realm, linking
everything from the One to matter.
The pagan Neoplatonists called the first of the spiritual being beneath the One the pre-essential
Demiurgos, the great craftsman. Next are the gods or divine intelligibles. The divine intelligibles
are divided into multiple species, all sharing a single essence. These species include the noetic,
noetic-noeric, and noetic gods as well as hypercosmic gods, the encosmic gods and the liberated
gods in between, as well as sub-lunar deities. The complete chain of divine beings, the gods and
the greater kinds, are: deities, archangels, angels, daimons, heroes, and pure rational souls.
Further, there is a celestial Demiurgos and a sub-lunar Demiurgos.
34. Hyper- and encosmic gods? Does that mean these deities exist in the realm of generation?
No. The essences of the gods are noetic and that is the place of their being. These terms instead
refer to the place of their divine activity rather than existence.
Yes, pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite uses the language of angels to refer to divine beings. The
noetic and noeric gods may have been understood by the Gnostics as the Aeons. The
hypercosmic gods are understood to be the fiery seraphim, the liberated gods the wise kerubim,
the encosmic gods the stable thrones and the sub-lunar gods the dominions. The archangels are
the heavenly powers, the angels the authorities, and the daimons to the angelic principalities.
Heroes are discussed as the angelic choir known as archangels, and pure souls as the choir of
angels.
Yes. They gods and greater kinds, or angelic choirs, belong to hierarchies based on their
ontologies activities, functions, and genegogic or anagogic activities.
In each triad, the role of the superior entities’ is perfection, the role of the median entities’ is
illumination and the role of the inferior entities’ is purification, all leading towards union, as
much as possible, with the Demiurgos
Hypercosmic Gods
Encosmic Gods Anagogic
Archangels
Angels
Sub-lunar Gods
Daimons Genegogic
Heroes
Purified Souls
41. What are the roles of the anagogic and genegogic hierarchies?
Anagogy means to raise something up. The anagogic hierarchy’s function is to raise souls
upwards towards participating the divine Mind, divinization, and divine union. The genegogic
hierarchy’s function is to incline souls towards the generative or physical cosmos.
The hierarchies consist of the same spiritual beings and reflect both our understanding of their
essences and of their activities.
In that some spiritual beings participate in the Good less than others, it is possible for them to do
evil while attempting to do good. Some, such as the gods and the pre-essential and heavenly
Demiurges, participate fully in the Good and are incapable of evil, even in the subsequent
consequences of their activities: all they do, and the effects of what they do, are always good.
Further, not all activities that have an adverse effect on humans are necessarily evil. Some
daimons have the duty of administering punishment for evil human activities while sometimes
what is good for the cosmos is not good for individual humans.
The Demiurge (Gk: Demiurgos, “Craftsman,” or “Public Worker”) is first mentioned in Plato’s
Timaeus. It is sometimes seen as the second god after the One.
Though Neoplatonists have varied on this, our tradition tells us there are three Demiurgoi. The
pre-essential (proousios) Demiurgos, a heavenly or celestial Demiurgos associated with Nous,
the Divine Mind, and a sub-lunar Demiurgos.
The pre-essential Demiurgos exists beyond Being and envelops the whole of the noetic realm,
containing within itself all the powers of the divine mind. This Demiurgos, who may be also
called Eternity, Paradigm, Eheieh, Heka Pronoia, and Autogenes, amongst others, is the True and
Invisible Sun, which is the symbol of the Demiurgos as the voice of the Good. This primary
Demiurgos is also called “anterior father,” “cause of the intelligibles,” and “god of gods.” The
Demiurgos’ role is to organize the noetic world and all its inhabitants according to the impulses
given by the One.
The secondary Demiurgos is Nous, the divine mind in participation and is thus the most posterior
aspect of the noetic realm and, as the Whole Soul, the most anterior aspect of the noeric realm.
This Demiurge has been associated with the gods Zeus, Helios, Horus, Amoun, the
Tetragrammaton or Havayah, and the Epinoia of Light associated with the Gnostic Aeon Zoe,
amongst others. The role of the secondary Demiurge is to reveal the intelligible divine minds in
the psychic and cosmic realms as well as to set these realms in order.
The tertiary Demiurgos rules over the sublunary world of generation and matter. It is called Ptah,
Hephestaeus, Asklepos, Hades, Osiris, Dionysius, and Adonai or the Christ of the Gospel of
John. Though not creator of matter or the generative cosmos, this Demiurgos takes the reason-
principles (Gk: logoi) or eternal guiding principles of the intelligible Forms that descend through
the primary and secondary Demiurgoi, and organizes them to give shape to the hulic matter of
the cosmos. The sub-lunar Demiurgos is also the ruler of all master daimons and it is through
Him that daimon is known.
No. The Demiurgoi fully participate the Good and are incapable of evil.
VI. Of the Human Being, the Soul and the Personal Daimon
A human being is a composite of a rational soul descended into generation and a physical body.
It is, through the rational soul, endowed with free will and encompassed by fate and providence.
Human beings are generally divided into three groups, the general mass of humanity, the rare
purified theurgic sage, and a median group in between.
The mass of humanity are those whose lives are centered completely in the generative cosmos,
their souls still dazed and confused from incarnation. They worship in a way suited to nature and
its trappings.
The purified theurgist, or theourgos, fully participates the work of the gods and the celestial
Demiurgos, called demiurgy. Having cleansed themselves of the accretions of matter and an
inclination towards generation they never again are lost in incarnation and are engaged in
demiurgy. They work and worship according to the laws of theurgy and the intellect.
Yes. “Human” souls are rational souls. Humans also have non-rational souls, connecting them to
the generative cosmos and non-human animals. Non-human animals also possess non-rational
souls.
A body is composed of hulic matter, shaped by the sub-lunar Demiurgos, and motivated by a
soul.
Rational souls were created from the divine Mind, Nous itself.
Unique as a median between the natural cosmos and the superior spiritual realms, the rational
soul is dual-essential. On the one hand it is a rational soul, an immortal creation from the divine
Mind, and inclines towards the noetic realm, and on the other hand it contains a worldly essence
and so inclines towards the generated cosmos.
Souls initially descend for the purpose of completing the universe. Further, once purified, they
continue to descend as a demonstration of divine life. Thus, the dual nature of the rational soul is
that it must descend into a body but must also rise again into the spiritual realms, either at death
or through theurgy.
60. Do all human souls descend into generation for the same reason?
No, after the primary descent, human souls may descend either voluntarily or involuntarily.
Those rare purified souls participating fully in their divine leader and the celestial Demiurgos is
engaged in divine work and understand its own dual nature. It voluntarily descends in order to
help less pure souls align themselves with the divine will.
As it is the very essence of the rational soul to incarnate in the natural cosmos, falling into
generation, in and of itself, is not evil is for a great and good purpose.
When falling into generation for the first time, human souls become confused, having no
familiarity with the natural cosmos, and so, mixed with a body, forget themselves. Having
forgotten themselves they cease, to varying degrees, to participate in the divine and gain
accretions of matter that bind them to generation and obscure their divine light and the light of
other spiritual beings. Purification removes these accretions and the passions of the hulic
cosmos.
Purification of the soul comes through personal engagement with the hieratic and theurgic rites.
The personal daimon, sometimes called the good daimon (Gk: eudiamon) or guardian angel, is
the spirit that watches over the rational soul, guiding it towards its divine leader, the celestial
Demiurgos, and Good, and so away from error.
The Neoplatonists taught that all humans have such a daimon, allotted to each by their divine
leader. It is possible that, as each person progresses spiritually, a new guardian, such as an angel
or archangel, will take over the work of the personal daimon, until the soul is completely purified
and walks in the train of the gods. This is found only in the most pure and illuminated of souls.
We can contact the personal daimon through theurgic rites related to the sub-lunar Demiurgos.
The final goal of theurgy is union (Gk: henosis) with the divine intelligibles, and possibly with
the One, so far as possible, and direct or intuitive knowledge (Gk: noera gnosis) of the
intelligible realm. It is also demiurgy, participation in the divine work of the Demiurgos and
other spiritual beings. Through theurgy we rise to the level of our supplication and so gradually
take on a divine perfection.
There are three general kinds of theurgic worship. These have been designated by Iamblichus as
material, immaterial, and a median class that uses both.
Material worship involves the use of material or physical tokens (Gk: sunthemata) and symbols
to raise ourselves to the encosmic divine intelligible and tertiary causes, such as archons and
daimons. This is the kind of theurgy most commonly practiced.
Immaterial worship involves the use of purely spiritual tokens without recourse to physical
symbols or ritual. The purpose of immaterial theurgy is to unite ourselves with the immaterial
gods. This form of theurgy is rarely practiced and only by the most advanced souls, the theurgic
sages.
74. What is the nature and purpose of the median class of theurgy?
The median class of worship employs both physical and immaterial tokens to unite ourselves
with the the liberated divine intelligibles. This form of theourgia is more rarely practiced and
only by those who are beginning to move beyond the need for material worship. The Ekklesia’s
Mystery of Synaxis makes use of this kind of theourgia.
Tokens can be likened to the thoughts of the divine intelligibles and the Demiurgoi made
manifest in material and supra-material ways. Natural objects, animals, the planets and stars, and
symbols from sacred scripture all contain divine tokens.
No. Though theurgy can bring about material results that is not its primary purpose. Theurgy
should be differentiated from sorcery, which brings about disharmony in the world by separating
parts of the hulic cosmos for individual power by reuniting them under human rather than
divinely created hierarchy.
No. Despite the apparent meaning of the word, theurgic invocation raises the practitioner to the
level of the invoked, as far as possible.
No commands or orders should ever be included in theurgic invocation. First, the need for
command demonstrates that the soul has not been assimilated to the higher principles as such
commands require the commander and the commanded, whereas the purified soul is one with its
object of worship. Second, souls cannot command the beings ontologically prior to themselves..
Yes, in that one can attain gnosis of many different things and beings and of the different realms.
Gnosis is not a single experience or understanding but a continuum stretching from the depths of
the natural cosmos to the One itself.
Neither gnosis nor henosis can be acquired solely through esoteric techniques. Instead henosis is
only gained through the extending upwards of the theurgist’s soul in participation with higher
beings. If not properly experienced, and without a corresponding movement of divine beings to
lift up the heart and mind of the theurgist, the noetic rites are little more than play acting.
Both, in that the theurgist must make real changes in themselves in order to become more like
the divine and that the divine is an active participant in the receiving of gnosis.
Though related to, and necessary for, demiurgy, gnosis and participation in the divine work are
not identical.
In the sense that henosis, union with the divine, can be accomplished not simply through the
hieratic rites but through divine involvement, it could be said that the Ekklesia Neoplatonismos
Theourgia recognizes a kind of salvation.
Henosis is a participation, as much as possible, in the higher causal principles and is achieved
through gradual assimilation into the divine, especially through purification. Theurgic salvation
can also be understood as the soul knowing itself and participating the divine intelligibles.
Yes and no. The purified soul does rise to the noetic realm and the circle of angels, liberation
from incarnation is a lesser and non-permanent goal of theurgy.
According to the divine Iamblichus, these are more important goals than liberation from the
material world: 1. Withdrawal from alien things. 2. Restoration of one’s own essence. 3.
Perfection. 4. Fullness. 5. Independence of will. 6. Ascent to and unification with the creative
cause. 7. The demiurgic activity of conjoining of parts with wholes. 8. Contribution from the
wholes to the parts of power, life and activity.
Free will or (Gk: prohairesis, literally “before choosing”) is the deliberate consideration before
choosing what action, if any, to take in a given situation. Free will is part of the essence of the
soul, and so expressed through its power and activity.
Because human beings have a descended soul our ethical decisions effect not only our physical
lives but our psychic lives as well.
91. Is our ability to choose freely absolute?
The ability for all but the most purified of souls to choose freely is not absolute because there are
things beyond most of our abilities to control, such as fate. This is because free will exists in the
rational soul and so depends on the individual’s spiritual knowledge of their own soul. Those
who identify entirely with their soul, rather than the material world, are freed from fate by having
aligned themselves with providence.
The free will of most people is variable and can be over ridden by influences by the sense-world
because the soul is still in a state of confusion and separated from its true nature.
The free will of a purified theurgist becomes “fixed” in that the soul no longer needs to
deliberate through discursive reasoning what actions to take, proper moral activity is known
intuitively through gnosis.
94. What is the relationship between free will and the soul’s descent into matter?
Those souls who incarnate for the purpose of further purification are brought into generation by
their personal daimons. However, purified souls, having aligned their wills with the gods and
Demiurgos, understandsthe necessity of their work and the illumination of all souls and therefore
willfully and freely descends into matter.
Fate (Gk: Hiemarmene) is the nature of the world in that it is the inherent movement of the
material world towards its divine ends and the necessities of nature.
All things inclined towards generation are subject to fate in as much as they are inclined towards
generation.
The rational soul is subject to fate only in as much as it has given itself to the realm of
generation. To the degree that the soul remembers itself and inclines towards the noetic realm it
is given over to its own self-authority, freedom and life. The soul fully centered on its noetic life
is free from fate.
Yes. Fate and providence are the same thing, viewed from different perspective. A soul in need
of purification, and so, to various degrees, not recognizing its own divine purpose, works against
itself and see what happens to it as fate. The soul aligned with its divine purpose see the divine
movement in natural actions, and so recognizes all things as providence. To quote Iamblichus:
“In accord with this same essence, then, fate is interwoven with providence and, in reality, fate is
providence, is established from it and around it” (Stob. II, 173).
100. If fate and providence are identical, and providence is the source of well-being, for what
reason are people “ill fated”?
The soul’s relationship to matter determines whether one’s life is ruled by fate or participates in
providence. This is directly related to the soul’s capacity to receive from above and the degree to
which it has been purified and has assimilated itself to the divine. Those soul inclined away from
the divine, and therefore fighting against the divine movements of the heavens and earth,
experience providence as fate.
Fate, or the perception of fate, is a barrier, as much as it is present within the life of an
individual, to divine union. It is instead necessary to experience divine providence as a sign of
participation in the higher activities of the divine hierarcy and movement towards union.
Ekklesia, through typically translated as “church,” refers to a gathering of people who have been
called together. The Ekklesia Neoplatismos Theourgia is an assembly of people, gathered
together to follow the same Neoplatonic tradition, mysteries, and sacred rites.
The English word “religion” comes from the Latin religonem, meaning respect for what is sacred
or the Latin religio, an obligation or bond between humanity and the divine. In that the Ekklesia
both respects the sacred and both recognizes and celebrates the bond between the One and
humanity, the Ekklesia Neoplatismos Theourgia represents a religion tradition
104. To what religious denomination does the Ekklesia Neoplatismos Theourgia belong?
105. Is this broadness of religious inclusivity too broad for a religious organization?
No. Many different religions over nearly the last two millennia have engaged with
Neoplatonism, it’s cosmology, theology, and theurgy, incorporating it into themselves and
participating fully in its exegetical traditions. Thus, there is a long tradition of people from
various religions engaging in Neoplatonism. The goal of the Ekkleisa is to bring together those
engaged in Neoplatonism, especially of the sort developed by the divine Iamblichus, and so
better the involvement of all.
The Platonic Academy was founded over 2500 years ago and existed in some form until at least
the 7th century CE, having incorporated many of the theurgic practices of Iamblichus. Platonism
and Neoplatonism have continued to influence many cultures, both Eastern and Western, until
the present. In that the Ekkleisa partakes of this current of thought, belief and practice it is
ancient. However, the body of the Ekklesia is a modern development, even if it has roots in
ancient times.
107. What are the main influences on the Ekklesia Neoplatonismos Theourgia’s beliefs and
practices?
Though the Ekklesia draws from many currents of inspiration, its primary sources are the
Platonic dialogues, the extant writings of Iamblichus, and the works of the 6th century writer
known as Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.
All those wishing to engage in the theurgy and worship of the Ekklesia, and are willing to view
and participate in the divine, the cosmos, and the hieratic rites in a manner in keeping with the
Ekklesia, may find a home there.
109. Are there other means to achieve gnosis and participate in the divine creative work
other than the Ekklesia Neoplatonismos Theourgia?
In that the divine manifests itself in a multitude of ways, sewing tokens throughout the world, it
is only natural that different vehicles of a kindred spirit have engaged in gnosis and demiurgy.
110. How is the Ekklesia Neoplatonismos Theourgia able to lead souls to divine union and
demiurgy?
The Ekklesia provides a community of sacred and hieratic practice through which the presence
of the divine intelligibles and the holy Demiurgos are made manifest, through the divine
hierarchy, to and within its members and through them the rest of the world.
X. Of the Mysteries or Ekklesiastic Hieratic Rites
The English word “mystery” is derived from the Greek word “musterion” (plural: musteria). The
Ekklesia’s use of the word refers to one of its sacred rites. In English these would be commonly
referred to sacraments. They are also referred to as rites (Gk: teletai).
The word sacrament comes from the Latin sacramentum, a sign and what is seen. Mustērion
refers to something hidden and stresses the power of the Good as made manifest in an unseen
way through the holy rites. Also, though there are many similarities between the Christian
sacraments and the Ekklesia’s mysteries they are not identical and using a different term helps
alleviate confusion.
The term “hieratic” was applied by the divine Iamblichus to the theurgic rites. It is a two-fold
allusion, first to that which is sacred and priestly and second to ancient Egyptian sacred writings.
A mystery is a sacred rite that has hidden within it the power and providence of the One. The
rites of the Ekkelisa are both mysterious and hieratic, containing the sacred and hidden powers of
the unseen world.
If performed by a fully purified and illuminated soul a mystery always produces the desired
result. However, those souls being few and far between, it is possible for one of the mysteries to
fail depending on the state of the soul performing it and the capacity of the soul receiving it. If
both souls are in a properly prepared state a mystery will always be successful, to varying
degrees, depending on the differing states of those involved.
Yes. The giver of a mystery must enter into a proper spiritual state for the noetic rite to be
successful. In order to accomplish this, various spiritual preparations, such as contemplation and
purification, must be undertaken.
Yes. The receiver of a mystery must also enter into a proper spiritual state for the noetic rite to be
successful. In order to accomplish this, various spiritual preparations, such as contemplation and
purification, must be undertaken.
118. Does the efficacy of the mystery depend on the merit of the person administering them?
Yes. The person administering a mystery is not merely a conduit for divine power but a
participant in that power. Without proper participation a mystery can only be performed in its
outer form, its inner power being absent.
119. What is happens if the mysteries are given or received in an unprepared state?
At best, nothing. At worst, the mystery may have the opposite of its intended result, moving the
soul farther away from the Good through antipathy.
Tradition holds that the hieratic rites were originally instituted by Julian the Chaldean and Julian
the Theurgist. As theurgic rites, however, they have their origins in the One, the Demiurgoi, and
the divine intelligibles. They were fully brought into by the divine Iamblichus. They have been a
part of Neoplatonism ever since. The mysteries, in the form and manner they in which they exist
today, were instituted by the Ekklesia, under the guidance of the Good and the Demiurgos.
There are nine mysteries; four related to the common life, one related to the communal life, and
four related to the hieratic life. Of these, there are three mysteries of purification, three of
illumination and three of perfection.
The three mysteries of the common life those of Divine Birth (Gk: Theogenesia), Affirmation
(Gk: Epivevaiosi) and Divine Union (Gk:Hieri Henosis), and What is Performed over those
Fallen Asleep (Gk: Epi Tois Kekoimemenois Teloumenon).
The four mysteries of the hieratic rite are the rite of the sacred vows of the secular monastic
Order of Hagia Hupatia, initiation into the Order of Hierokeruxes, into the order of Hiereis, and
into the Order of Hierarches.
The mysteries of purification are the Divine Birth, the sacred vows of the Order of Hagia
Hupatia, and initiation into the Order of Hierokeruxes. They are called this because of the
cathartic effect they have upon the soul by which hulic accretions are removed according to the
mystery undertaken. However, the mystery of the Divine Birth also partakes of illumination and
perfection.
The mysteries of illumination are the rite of Affirmation and initiation into the Order of Hiereis.
They are called this because, having some of the hulic accretions surrounding the soul removed,
they bring an influx of divine brilliance to the receiver/s, leaning them towards gnosis.
The mysteries of perfection are those of Divine Union, Assembly, and initiation into the Order of
Hierarches. They are called this because they lead the receivers from gnosis to union. However,
the mystery of Assembly also partakes of purification and illumination.
The initiatory mysteries of consecration into holy Orders, the Divine Birth and Affirmation are
generally only received once. The exception to this may be if it is believed the mysteries were
administered in a deficient manner.
The effects of the mysteries are to lead the practitioner from a state of ignorance and occlusion to
gnosis and henosis through the measured steps appropriate to each soul. It is through the
mysteries the human soul is able to escape the confines of fate and more fully participate in
God’s providence. Likewise, it is through the mysteries that the One makes itself known to the
cosmos through the soul of humanity.
The first mystery of the common life is the rite of Divine Birth. This is a ritual of immersion in
water that has correlates in Judaism, Christianity and several forms of pre-Christian
Mediterranean, near and middle-eastern religions.
131. At what age should one receive the rite of Divine Birth?
As theurgic rites involves the understanding and active will of the receiver as well as the clergy,
the rite of divine birth should be administered only to one who has reached the age of reason.
Those beneath the age of majority must have the permission of their parents or guardians, as well
as that of the Ekklesia.
The mystery of the Divine Birth acts to cleanse the soul and its vehicle of the hule that interferes
with the reception of divine illumination and the logoi inappropriate to the life of the receiver’s
soul. Through participation in the Divine Birth the recipient may more easily regain the
illuminated path and move away from the ignorance of the Good that we call evil.
As a mystery of the common life, the mystery of the Divine Birth is especially given to the Order
of Hierokeruxes. However, any ordained clergy can perform the mystery of the Divine Birth. In
cases of extreme need, a properly trained Brother or Sister of the Order of Hagia Hupatia may
also perform the rite.
A Divinely Born person should participate in the mysteries, especially the mystery of Synaxis.
Such a person should also participate in the study of the literature of Plato, Neoplatonism, and
gnosis in general.
The second mystery of the common life is that of Affirmation. This rite confirms the dedicant’s
commitment to, and participation of, the hieratic life, as well as to the Ekklesia. This mystery is
typically given immediately after that of Divine Birth.
Not before the age of adolescences and not before having received the mystery of Divine Birth.
This may be performed concurrent to the mystery of the Divine Birth. Those beneath the age of
majority must have the permission of their parents or guardians, as well as that of the Ekklesia.
The mystery of Affirmation is a rite of spiritual illumination, the full effects of which are only
possible after having received the Divine Birth.
The mystery of Affirmation acts of open the dedicant to the light of the divine intelligibles which
bring humanity gnosis.
140. Who can administer the mystery of Affirmation?
As a mystery of the common life, the mystery of Affirmation is especially given to the Order of
Hierokeruxes. However, the holy oil used in the rite must be consecrated by Hierarch of the
Ekklesia.
The third mystery of the common life is that of Divine Union or marriage.
The mystery of Divine Union is one of perfection, the bringing together of the particular into the
universal or the many into the one.
The mystery of Divine Union serves to bind two lives as one. This act of union below causes,
through harmony and divine sympathy, the yearning of the soul for a higher union. Through this
sympathy the light of perfection may enter the souls so brought together in the generative world.
It is an act of the divine marriage that perfects earthly love with divine love.
1. Are there any preparations necessary to receive the mystery of Divine Union?
Yes. Those seeking to receive the mystery of Union should prepare themselves separately
through theurgic prayer and at least one must have received the mysteries of the Divine Birth and
Affirmation.
Yes. As with all the theurgic mysteries, sympathy between above and below is an important
element in this mystery. As union is perfected through love (Gk: eros), those seeking to receive
and participate in this mystery must assure themselves that their love is not merely physical but
spiritual. Physical love may beget physical union, but only spiritual love can beget the higher
union and move the soul towards the One.
As a mystery of the common life, the mystery of Affirmation is especially given to the Order of
Hierokeruxes. However, if the mystery of Assembly is also performed with the rite, a Hieras or
Hiereia, or a Hierarch, must also be present.
As a mystery of communal life, the mystery of Synaxis is especially given to the Order of
Hieres.
Reversion is the process of returning to one’s origins. Reversion, or Self-Reversion, brings the
souls of the participants knowledge of their essences, and thus the ability preserve the self-
identity of the soul through the shedding of hulic accretions and participation in the divine
intelligible.
152. What is the nature of the mystery of the Liturgy of the Intelligibles?
The Intellitible Liturgy is a communal practice of contemplatively reading sacred scripture, also
known as lectio divina, which literally means “sacred reading.” Through the reading and
contemplation of sacred scriptures the practitioners can gain a gnostic illumination.
153. What is the nature of the mystery of the Consumption of the Divine Life?
The mystery of Assembly is a rite of perfection. Through the consumption of theourgic symbols
the divine in manifestation those partaking in the mystery of Assembly participate in unity with
the divine.
As a mystery of the communal life, the mystery of the Liturgy of the Demiurgos is especially
given to the Order of Hieres.
These rites represent the ordination and consecration, or initiation, into monastic and sacred
orders of clergy within the Ekklesia Neoplatonismos Theourgia.
156. By what other term has the Neoplatonic Ekklesia sometimes referred to those initiated
into the sacred orders of clergy?
There are three, namely: Hierokerux or Sacred Herald, Hieras and Hiereia or Priest and Priestess,
and that of Hierarch, the Sacred Governor of the Mysteries.
The Hierokerux is responsible for performance the mysteries of the common and as well as the
general instruction of the laity. They are further responsible for assisting the Hiereis/Hiereies and
Hierarches in the higher mysteries, along with the leitourgoi or ritual assistants.
The Hiereis/Hiereies are responsible for the overseeing of the performance of the works of the
Order of Hierokeruxes and for the working of the mysteries communal life. As a Hieras/Hiereia
also holds the office of Hierokerux, they are trained and endowed with the capability of
performing all the duties of that office.
The Hierarches is responsible for the overseeing of the work of the Hiereis/Hiereies and for the
working of the mysteries of the hieratic life and to oversee the spiritual life of the Ekklesia. As a
Hierarch also holds the offices of Hierokerux and Hieras/Hiereia, they are trained and endowed
with the capability of performing all the duties of those offices.
161. What are some of the requirements for a person to worthily receive Sacred Orders?
To worthily receive Sacred Orders it is necessary: 1) that one be of good character and in a state
receptive to divine illumination and gnosis; 2) that one be informed of the Platonic Mythoi and
hermeneutic; 3) that one have the intention of devoting one’s life to the sacred rites and those
who would benefit from them; 4) that one be determined to teach and perform the hieratic rites,
and the gnosis and henosis that stem from them, according to the teachings, practices and spirit
of the Neoplatonic Ekklesia; and 5) that one should have the inward call from one’s spirit and the
outward call from one’s Hierarches.
Yes. The giving of vows to a member of the Order of Hagia Hypatia, a secular monastic order
open to both the laity and those within the sacred orders is included in these mysteries.
165. Who may receive vows into the Order of Hagia Hypatia?
Any woman or man who has undertaken the mysteries of Divine Birth and Affirmation and
wishes to devote their lives to the work of the Order, philosophical and moral education, gnosis,
and henosis.
Bibliography
Finamore, John F. Iamblichus and the Theory of the Vehicle of the Soul. Chico, CA: Scholars
Press, 1985.
Iamblichus. De Anima. Translated by John F. Finamore and John M. Dillon. Atlanta: Society of
Biblical Literature, 2002.
Luibheid, Colm, trans. Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. NY: Paulist Press, 1987.
Plato. The Collected Dialogues. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1961.
Shaw, Gregory. Theurgy and the Soul. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press,
1995.