CLAT Mock Test for Aspiring Lawyers
CLAT Mock Test for Aspiring Lawyers
"Part of the most Comprehensive Classroom Training, Prep Content & Test Series across the Nation.
     From the producers of the Best and the Most number of A.I.Rs in the past years, every year!"
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
1.    No clarification on the question paper can be sought. Answer the questions as they are.
2.    There are 150multiple choice objective type questions.
3.    Each question carries ONE mark. Total marks are 150.
4.    There is a negative marking of 0.25 marks for every incorrect answer.
5.    Candidates have to indicate the correct answer by darkening one of the four responses provided,
      with a BALL PEN (BLUE OR BLACK) in the OMR Answer Sheet.
      Example: For the question, "Where is the TajMahal located?", the correct answer is (b).
      The candidate has to darken the corresponding circle as indicated below :
      (a) Kolkata             (b) Agra             (c) Bhopal           (d) Delhi
        Right Method                                              Wrong Methods
6.    Answering the questions by any method other than the method indicated above shall be considered
      incorrect and no marks will be awarded for the same.
7.    More than one response to a question shall be counted as wrong.
8.    The candidate shall not write anything on the OMR Answer Sheet other than the details required
      and in the spaces provided for.
9.    After the Test is over, the candidate has to return the OMR Answer Sheet to the invigilator. The
      candidate should take the Test Paper along with them.
10.   The use of any unfair means by any candidate shall result in the cancellation of his/her candidature.
11.   Impersonation is an offence and the candidate, apart from disqualification, may have to face
      criminal prosecution.
12.   Electronic gadgets like mobile phones, pagers or calculators are strictly not permitted inside the
      Test Centre/Hall.
13.   The candidates shall not leave the hall before the Test is over.
MOCK CLAT #05
       Passage (Q.1-Q.5):The locus of contemporary debates on free expression and the limits thereof across
       societies and cultures is individual freedom versus communal welfare. The founding principles for this
       discussion can be traced back to two seminal texts whose relevance has not diminished despite the
       passage of centuries-Plato's Republic (especially Books II, in and X) and John Milton's Areopagitica.
       Plato's polemical treatise builds up a strong case for exiling poets and poetry from an ideal republic he
       envisages, while Milton's seventeenth century pamphlet remains a passionate espousal of free speech.
       Both arguments are used knowingly or unknowingly by defenders of the faith in opposing camps of free
       expression today.
       Plato's position vis-à-vis poetry as exemplified through his Republic is a masterful emphasis of the
       functionality of art and literature. His stance is that poetry, and by extension literature, should provide
       good role models which would aid in character building and anything that does not provide it is
       anathema. He is not against poetry or stories as such, since he agrees that stories are necessary to train
       the young mind. However, the poetic imagination should be instructed to create only stories of a certain
       kind, the story is to be avoided "whenever an erroneous representation is made of the nature of gods and
       heroes-as when a painter paints a portrait not having the shadow of a likeness to the original" (Jowett
       n.d.). This is why he would keep away from even great poets like Homer and Hesiod, for "the fault of
       telling a lie, and, what is more, a bad lie" (ibid.). Plato's objection to poetry is when it represents the
       negative emotions among the gods, like the petty rivalries and jealousies that were the cause of many a
       mythological war. It is quite obvious that according to the Platonic yardstick, Vyasa and Valmiki would
       have been banished along with Homer and Hesiod from the ideal polis. Plato's argument that artists are
       imitators who are "thrice removed from reality" and "copy images of virtue and the like, the truth they
       never reach," are reasons enough to cast the poet out of the pales of the city (ibid.). There is an implicit
       acceptance that the State is right in his statement that the State should provide the template for artistic
       creations: "but now the founders of a State ought to know the general forms in which poets should cast
       their tales, and the limits which must be observed by them, but to make the tales is not their business.
       Plato's ideal republic is also the blueprint for autocratic regimes where artists are expected to follow the
       guidelines laid down by the State, like Stalin's famous exhortation.
1.     Why according to the passage does Plato keeps away from the great poets such as Homer?
       (a) According to Plato only those stories should be studied to aid good character.
       (b) According to Plato the writings of Homer were very sub-standard.
       (c) According to Plato, Homer had no idea of what he was writing.
       (d) All of the above.
2.     How would Homer and Hesiod be same as Valmiki and Vyasa according to the passage?
       (a) Vyasa and Valmiki are were the Homer and Hesiod of the east.
       (b) Both the pairs were the creators of imaginative literature which does not reach the truth.
       (c) Plato was against the use of poetry to create stories.
       (d) Plato considered any work below his works as sub-standard works.
3.     Why does the author says that Plato’s ideal republic is also the blueprint for autocratic regime?
       (a) According to the author, Plato is a very ideal man.
       (b) Because of the Plato’s thinking that the artists should follow the guidelines laid down by the
           government.
       (c) It is because of Plato’s hatred for Homer and Hesiod.
       (d) All of the above.
5.     According to Plato, what is the reason to cast the poet out of the pales of the city?
       (a) That the poets are very far away from reality
       (b) That they are not good for communal welfare
       (c) That they are the freeloaders
       (d) That the artists are not needed in an equal society.
       Passage (Q.6-Q.10):In an audio file of the interview uploaded to YouTube, Ambedkar can be heard
       saying that Gandhi was no reformer. “He was just an episode in the history of India, not an epoch maker,”
       Ambedkar said.
       While some Gandhian scholars have dismissed Ambedkar’scharacterisation of Gandhi as mere ‘polemic’,
       I would argue that his sharp criticism stems from logical analysis and philosophical disagreement rather
       than hatred for Gandhi as a political opponent.
       After thoroughly interrogating the social and economic foundations of Gandhian philosophy,
       Ambedkar diagnosed Gandhism as a dangerous doctrine.
       The Gandhian prescription for an ideal society was to establish a perfect caste system. Till 1922, Gandhi
       was an ardent proponent of the caste system. He saw great value in caste and openly advocated its
       continuance.
       Gandhi glorified caste as responsible for the durability of Hindu society; as a seed of swaraj (freedom); as
       a unique power of organisation, as a means of providing primary education and raising a defence force;
       as a means of self-restraint; as the natural order of society; and most important of all, as the eternal
       principle of hereditary occupation for maintaining societal order.
       Enunciating all these merits of caste, Gandhi declares, “These being my views I am opposed to all those
       who are out to destroy the caste system.”
       Later, Gandhi switched his terminology from that of caste to varna.
       Around 1925, Gandhi declared that varna rather than caste was his social ideal. He suggested the
       smaller castes fuse and ‘reproduce the old system of four varnas.’ The old varna system prevalent in
       ancient India had society divided into four vertically hierarchical orders: Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas
       and Shudras whose socially legislated occupations were learning, warfare, trade and service to the
       above three varnas respectively. Ambedkar saw no real change in Gandhi’s position as Gandhi’s varna
       ideal carried forward the hereditary occupation from the caste model intact.
       Ambedkar rightly pointed out that even within the framework of a Gandhian utopia, the Shudras were to
       continue as a servile class. And ati-shudras (present-day Dalits) were to be integrated into the
       Shudravarna.
       The economic ideal of the Gandhian model was equally revolting for Ambedkar’s modernist sensibilities.
       Firstly, Gandhi was against machinery and modern civilisation. In contrast, Ambedkar argues that modern
       machinery enables humans to have leisure. And leisure, in turn, is the primary precondition for culture
       and civilisation to thrive, which make human life worthy of its existence. Secondly, the Gandhian idea of
       ‘trusteeship’ is ostensibly geared towards the elimination of class struggle in the relationship between
       employers and employees and between landlords and tenants. Ambedkar, being a trained economist,
       was highly sceptical of the rich protecting the interests of the poor.
10.    The lines, “These being my views I am opposed to all those who are out to destroy the caste system.”,
       suggest the tone of the speaker to be:
       (a) Reflective
       (b) Apologetic
       (c) Frustrated
       (d) Decisive
       Passage (Q.11-Q.15):If liberalization is the answer to corruption, why did the biggest corruption scandal
       occur in telecommunications? After all, telecom was the biggest success story of the reforms. As a result
       of market competition, India had the lowest tariffs and the second largest number of mobile phones in the
       world. How did one explain the 2G scam? The one thing that the market did not control in telecom was
       the radio spectrum. The state controlled it and no one reckoned with a devious minister who created
       artificial scarcity in the 2G spectrum and then gave it away in driblets to those who allegedly bribed him.
       The man could have been avoided had the licences been awarded via open, transparent bidding on the
       Internet.
       By January 2011 there was plenty of rage over 2G across the land, and at its heart was the problem of
       silence. The public was furious with the prime minister. His telecom minister, Andimuthu Raja, had
       announced a policy to distribute radio spectrum to companies in September 2007. Manmohan Singh,
       sensing that wrongdoing was afoot, wrote to Raja, objecting to the minister's policy and exhorting him to
       be transparent. Raja replied immediately, defending himself. On 3 January 2008, the prime minister
       acknowledged this letter-yes, acknowledged', as though he had acquiesced. This gave Raja the
       permission to go ahead and issue the controversial licences. In May 2010, the prime minister admitted
       that Raja had indeed written to him.
       People wanted to know why their prime minister had fallen silent after having objected initially to the
       policy. In those dark months, people had desperately wanted to clutch on to an honest man. They
       thought they had found one in selfless, ethical Manmohan Singh. Everyone conceded that the prime
       minister was personally honest, but they insistently asked about the value of a leader who was himself
       upright but whose government was corrupt. It confirmed that the most important quality in a leader was
       determination-more important than even intelligence and personal integrity, both of which their prime
       minister possessed in abundance. They concludes sadly that Manmohan Singh the leader was a failure.
       The prime minister's silence raised questions over his integrity in some people's minds, just as it had in
       the case of the venerable Bhishma, the respected and selfless grandfather in the Mahabharata. Bhishma
       too had remained silent when Draupadi was being disrobed by his grandchildren. When Draupadi had
       insistently looked at him in the assembly and questioned the 'dharma of the ruler', no one had replied.
       Everyone, including Bhishma, had remained silent. Then Vidura spat out at the immorality of silence.
       Quoting Rishi Kashyapa, he had said that when a crime occurs, half the punishment goes to the guilty, a
       quarter to his ally and another quarter falls to those who remain silent.
11.    Why the author thinks that telecommunication was the biggest liberalization?
       (a) Within two decades of liberalization, it gave the opportunity for the biggest political scam in India.
       (b) India had the lowest tariff rates in the world and the second largest number of mobile phones in the
           world.
       (c) The radio spectrum in the telecommunication sector was controlled by the state government.
       (d) None of the above.
12.    “When a crime occurs, half the punishment goes to the guilty, a quarter to his ally and another quarter
       falls to those who remain silent”. Which of the following tone does the line presents?
       (a) Scornful
       (b) Angry
       (c) Contemplative
       (d) Satirical
13.    According to the author, which of the following reason lead to the conclusion that Manmohan Singh was
       a failed leader?
       (a) Manmohan Singh lacked intelligence
       (b) Manmohan Singh lacked determination
       (c) Manmohan Singh lacked integrity
       (d) All of the above.
15.    Why has the author compared Manmohan Singh with Bhisma?
       (a) Unlike Bhisma, Manmohan Singh kept Silent when the wrong was being committed.
       (b) Like Bhisma, Manmohan Singh kept Silent when the wrong was being committed.
       (c) Both of them are grand old man of their empires.
       (d) Both of them are respectful characters.
       Passage (Q.16-Q.20):Jesus Christ was a historical figure of staggering influence, perhaps the most
       enigmatic and inspirational leaders the world has ever seen. As the prophesied Messiah, Jesus toppled
       kings, inspired millions and founded new philosophies. As a descendant of the lines of King Solomon and
       King David, Jesus possessed a rightful claim to the throne of the King of the Jews. Understandably, His
       life was recorded by thousands of followers across the land. Teabing paused to sip his tea and then
       placed the cup back on the mantel. 'More than eighty gospels were considered for the New Testament,
       and yet only a relative few were chosen for inclusion - Matthew, Mark, Luke and John among them.' Who
       chose which gospels to include?' Sophie asked. "Aha! Teabing burst in with enthusiasm. The
       fundamental irony of Christianity! The Bible, as we know it today, was collated by the pagan Roman
       emperor Constantine the Great.'
       I thought Constantine was a Christian,' Sophie said. Hardly, Teabing scoffed. 'He was a lifelong pagan
       who was baptized on his deathbed, too weak to protest. In Constantine's day, Rome's official religion was
       sun worship - the cult of Sol Invictus, or the Invincible Sun - and Constantine was its head priest.
       Unfortunately for him, a growing religious turmoil was gripping Rome. Three centuries after the crucifixion
       of Jesus Christ, Christ's followers had multiplied exponentially. Christians and pagans began warring and
       the conflict grew to such pro Portions that it threatened to rent Room in two Constantine decided
       something had to be done. In 325 AD, he decided to unify Rome under a single religion. Christianity.
       Sophie said, 'Why would a pagan emperor choose Christianity as the official religion!! Teabing chuckled.
       'Constantine was a very good businessman. He could see that Christianity was on the rise, and he simply
       backed the winning horse Historians still marvel at the brilliance with which Constantine converted the
       sun-worshipping pagans to Christianity. By fusing pagan symbols, dates and rituals into the growing
       Christian tradition, he created a kind of hybrid religion that was acceptable to both parties.'
       Transmogrification,' Langdon said. The vestiges of pagan religion in Christian symbology are undeniable.
       Egyptian sun disk became the halos of Catholic saints. Pictograms of Isis nursing her miraculously
       conceived son Horus became the blueprint for our modern images of the Virgin Mary nursing Baby
       Jesus. And virtually all the elements of the Catholic ritual the mitre, the altar, the doxology and
       communion, the act of "God-eating" were taken directly from earlier pagan mystery religions.
19.    Sophie said, 'Why would a pagan emperor choose Christianity as the official religion”. What expression
       does Sophie has.
       (a) Frustrated
       (b) Satirical
       (c) Puzzled
       (d) Solemn
       Passage (Q.21-Q.25):The day was dawning, and the shepherd urged his sheep in the direction of the
       sun. They never have to make any decision, he thought. Maybe that’s why they always stay close to me.
       The only things that concern the sheep were food and water. As long as the boy knew how to find the
       best pasteurs in Andalusia, they would be his friends. Yes, their days were all the same, with the
       seamingly endless hours between sunrise and dusk; and they had never read a book in their young lives
       and did not understand when the boy told them about the sights of the cities. They were content with just
       food and water, and, in exchange, they generously gave off their wool, their company, and – once in a
       while – their meat.
       If I became a monster today, and decided to kill them, one by one, they would become aware only after
       most of the flock had been slaughtered, thought the boy. They trust me and they have forgotten how to
       rely on their own instincts, because I lead them to nourishment.
       The boy was surprised at his thoughts. Maybe the church, with the sycamore growing from within had
       been haunted. It had caused him to have the same dream for a second time, and it was causing him to
       feel anger towards his faithful companions. He drank a bit from the wine that remained from his dinner of
       the night before, and he gathered his jacket closer to his body.
21.    What nature of the sheep has been highlighted by the boy in this passage?
       (a) Their monotonous life
       (b) Their minimalistic life
       (c) Their naïve nature
       (d) Their trusting nature
23.    In the passage, the author is concerned about which of the following?
       (a) The sheep
       (b) The sycamore
       (c) Himself
       (d) All of the above
24.    In the italicized line, one error is present. Which of the following is it?
       (a) There is a grammatical mistake of tenses
       (b) There is a mistake in the use of punctuation-marks
       (c) There is a spelling error
       (d) There is no error
25.    Few figures of speech have been used in the statement. Which of the following has been used?
       (a) Simile
       (b) Metaphor
       (c) Metonymy
       (d) Assonance
       Passage (Q.26-Q.30):In a new report, the Washington, DC-based air-quality think tank Open AQ notes
       that “more data underpins all actions on air pollution”. The report, entitled ‘Open Air Quality Data: The
       Global State of Play’, makes its case by arguing that 51% of countries, representing 1.4 billion people,
       don’t generate any air-quality data. And of those that do, only 38% share data in real-time.
       While it’s easy to agree, in principle, with the egalitarian ideals of data democratisation and transparency,
       the report errs when it argues for more investment in regulatory data generation and the government
       ownership of data. Specifically, it ignores the political issues underlying the air pollution crisis.
       In order to effectively address the air pollution crisis, it is important to first understand the political
       economy of the crisis – i.e., acknowledging the nexus of air pollution, politics and the economy.
       India’s premiere pollution watchdog agency, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), has also been
       exposed to accusations. In 2019, the National Green Tribunal sought a response from the CPCB after a
       petition alleged that CPCB had fudged pollution data. Accusations of data misrepresentation have been
       levelled against state pollution control agencies as well. For example, in April 2017, the Maharashtra
       Pollution Control Board was accused of presenting false data to shield the Koradi thermal power plant
       near Nagpur from regulatory action.
       The centralised control also tempts regulatory agencies to engage in the selective elimination of data,
       often in response to political compulsions. On the 69th Republic Day celebrations in New Delhi, the Delhi
       Pollution Control Committee shut down most of its monitors to evade negative press on the city’s air
       pollution crisis, especially in the presence of 10 ASEAN state leaders.
       In February 2019, the citizens of Whitefield, Bengaluru, won a landmark case against a polluting graphite
       factory in their neighbourhood. After paying a fine of Rs 50 lakh in 2018, the factory was subsequently
       shut down in 2019 on directions from the National Green Tribunal. At the centre of this case was the
       exhaustive air quality data generated by the residents of Whitefield – a feat that the region’s foremost
       regulatory agency, the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board, had failed to achieve in over two
       decades.
       The examples above demonstrate that central ownership of data can’t pave the way to data
       democratization. In that, Open AQ’s case for data transparency seems logical in an ideal world where
       governments do what they ought to do.
       [Extracted with edits and revisions from the article ‘Simply Generating More Data and Sharing It Won’t
       Solve Our Air Pollution Crisis’ published in The Wire Science]
26.    Which of the following word can be used for someone who ‘errs’?
       (a) Impeccable
       (b) Immaculate
       (c) Fallible
       (d) Unimpeachable
27.    Which of the following statement is consistent with the report of think tank Open AQ?
       (a) Data should be owned by private entities.
       (b) Government agencies are not well equipped to own data.
       (c) Data generation can stop the air pollution.
       (d) The data should be controlled and governed by the government.
28.    What does the author mean when he says that he wants the democratization of data?
       (a) Data should be owned by private entities.
       (b) Data serve no purpose in a democratic country like India when controlled by government agencies.
       (c) Data should be owned by state government also.
       (d) Data should be available to all without any hindrance.
30.    “Delhi Pollution Control Committee shut down most of its monitors to evade negative press on the city’s
       air pollution crisis, especially in the presence of 10 ASEAN state leaders”. Which of the following can best
       describe the intention of the author behind this statement?
       (a) Science is often pressed into the service of political agenda.
       (b) Reality of pollution in Delhi might affect the relations with ASEAN nations.
       (c) Science should be used to prevent air pollution.
       (d) Delhi is most polluted in India.
Directions (Q.31–Q.68): Read the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
       Passage (Q.31-Q.35):The NEP proposes sweeping changes including opening up of Indian higher
       education to foreign universities, dismantling of the UGC and the All India Council for Technical
       Education (AICTE), introduction of a four-year multidisciplinary undergraduate programme with multiple
       exit options, and discontinuation of the M Phil programme. In school education, the policy focuses on
       overhauling the curriculum, “easier” Board exams, a reduction in the syllabus to retain “core essentials”
       and thrust on “experiential learning and critical thinking”. In a significant shift from the 1986 policy, which
       pushed for a 10+2 structure of school education, the new NEP pitches for a “5+3+3+4” design
       corresponding to the age groups 3-8 years (foundational stage), 8-11 (preparatory), 11-14 (middle), and
       14-18 (secondary). This brings early childhood education (also known as pre-school education for
       children of ages 3 to 5) under the ambit of formal schooling. The mid-day meal programme will be
       extended to pre-school children. The NEP says students until Class 5 should be taught in their mother
       tongue or regional language. The policy also proposes phasing out of all institutions offering single
       streams and that all universities and colleges must aim to become multidisciplinary by 2040.
32.    Which of the following is not one of the recommendation of the NEP 2020?
       (a) Replacing the UGC and AICTE with the Higher Education Commission of India
       (b) Setting up of National Research program.
       (c) Discontinuation of PhD’s
       (d) Discontinuation of M.Phil.
33.    Which of the following are the fundamental principles of the policy?
       (a) Achieving Foundational Literacy and Numeracy in all students by Grade
       (b) No hard separations between arts and sciences, curricular and extra-curricular activities, vocational
           and academic streams, among others to eliminate harmful hierarchies and silos in areas of learning
       (c) ‘Light but Tight’ regulatory framework to promote integrity, transparency and resource efficiency of the
           educational system
       (d) All of the above
34.    Which of the following is not a council under the Higher Education Council of India (HECI)?
       (a) National Higher Education Regulatory Council (NHERC)
       (b) General Education Council (GEC)
       (c) Higher Education Grants Council (HEGC)
       (d) National Education Proctorial Board.
35.    The National Education Policy aims to transform India’s education system by which year?
       (a) 2030
       (b) 2035
       (c) 2040
       (d) 2050
       Passage (Q.36-Q.40):Five years since the signing of a framework agreement between the Indian
       government and the National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Isak-Muivah), the deadlock in the talks that
       came about in October 2019 persists with the emergence of bottlenecks. The NSCN (I-M) has demanded
       that Nagaland Governor [1] should be removed as the interlocutor for talks on the Naga accord. Talks
       were expanded in 2017 by including other Naga groups under the banner, the Naga National Political
       Groups (NNPGs). Clearly, the Governor’s letter in June addressed to Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio, alleging
       the collapse of law and order and that armed gangs “who question the sovereignty and integrity of the
       nation” were engaging in “blatant extortion”, touched a sore spot for the NSCN (I-M). While the group
       defended the practice by terming it “tax collection”, the letter was not entirely off the mark. Yet, this has
       become an issue for the peace process with the NSCN (I-M) going on to release details of the 2015
       framework agreement that has not been shared in the public domain so far. While the other Naga groups
       also took exception to the Governor’s remarks to the Chief Minister, they have differed with the NSCN (I-
       M) on the demand for [1] removal as interlocutor.
37.    Which of the following is not one of the demands of Naga groups?
       (a) Separate Flag
       (b) Separate Constitution
       (c) Sovereign Statehood
       (d) Naga national Song
       Passage (Q.41-Q.45):The conflict in the Caucasus Mountains has remained unresolved for more than
       three decades, with periodic bouts of fighting.
       Border clashes in July killed at least 16 people, prompting the largest demonstration in years in the
       Azerbaijani capital [1], where there were calls for the region's recapture.
       Any upsurge in violence could unsettle markets as the South Caucasus is a corridor for pipelines carrying
       oil and natural gas from the Caspian Sea to world markets.
       Turkish President RecepTayyipErdogan pledged support for Azerbaijan, urging the world to stand with
       the country in its "battle against invasion and cruelty". Azerbaijanis are a predominantly Turkic people
       with whom Turkey has close ties.
       Russia, traditionally seen as an ally of Armenia, called for an immediate ceasefire and talks to stabilise
       the situation.
       In other reaction:
        UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was "extremely concerned" over and called for both
            sides to stop fighting
        France, which has a large Armenian community, called for an immediate ceasefire and dialogue
        Iran, which borders both Azerbaijan and Armenia, offered to broker peace talks
        President Donald Trump said the US was seeking to stop the violence.
42.    Which of the following is the reason of dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan?
       (a) Nagorno-Karabakh region has 95% of the population as ethnically Armenian and is controlled by
           them but it is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan.
       (b) Armenia is Christian majority, while Azerbaijan is Muslim majority country.
       (c) The leaders of both the nations have fuelled the issue time and again for their vested political
           interests.
       (d) All of the above
44.    India and Azerbaijan are both part of International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), which of the
       following countries has the observer status in INSTC?
       (a) Republic of Turkey
       (b) Republic of Ukraine,
       (c) Oman
       (d) Bulgaria
45.    In April 2016, violent fighting occurred between the two countries in what came to be known as?
       (a) Four-day war
       (b) Fifteen-day war
       (c) Eighteen-day war
       (d) Twenty-day war
       Passage (Q.46-Q.50):After more than a decade of backdoor negotiations, secret talks and interventions
       by a number of interested parties, representatives of the Afghanistan government and the [2] are directly
       talking to each other in the [4].
       Described by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as a “truly momentous” breakthrough, it is however far
       from clear what the outcome of the talks will be. But the fact that they are the first-ever peace talks
       between the Afghan government and the [2] is historic in itself, and opens a slight window of opportunity
       for peace in a country that has been ravaged by seemingly endless war for more than four decades.
       India’s challenges and opportunities
       If the peace process gathers steam, the [2] could end up playing a bigger role in Afghan politics. New
       Delhi has reasons to be unhappy about this because Indian officials, employees and assets have been
       repeatedly targeted by the ISI-backed Haqqani network.
       The presence of US troops for nearly two decades meant that there was an element of stability in Kabul,
       and it ensured that the national capital was not controlled by the insurgents even though they mounted
       several deadly bombing attacks on the city.
       There is a question mark over the safety and viability of Indian investments in Afghanistan once the
       remaining US troops withdraw. New Delhi is also concerned that Pakistan, with its deep links with the
       militant groups, will divert some of the hardened fighters to Jammu and Kashmir if peace prevails in
       Afghanistan.
       Nevertheless, unlike on some earlier occasions, New Delhi took a more pragmatic approach this time
       around and participated in the intra-Afghan inaugural dialogue.
       Despite New Delhi’s misgivings, not engaging with the [2] at this stage would only mean that India would
       have an even lesser say in a future security architecture in Afghanistan, and give Pakistan the edge.
.
46.    Which of the following deals paved the way for the above said talks?
       (a) India-Afghanistan
       (b) US-Taliban
       (c) US-Afghanistan
       (d) India-US
47.    Which of the following can be replaced with [2] in the above passage?
       (a) Iran
       (b) Iraq
       (c) USA
       (d) Taliban
48.    Which of the following is not one of the objectives of the deal stated in question 1?
       (a) An end to violence by declaring a ceasefire.
       (b) An intra-Afghan dialogue for a lasting peace.
       (c) The Taliban is named in the grey list of FATF.
       (d) U.S. troop withdrawal by April 2021.
49.    Which of the following can be replaced with the [4] in the above passage?
       (a) Doha
       (b) Kabul
       (c) Heart
       (d) Kandahar
       Passage (Q.51-Q.56):It’s a brand-new Middle East. Within the span of only a month, the United States
       has brokered peace between Israel and two Arab countries—first the United Arab Emirates, then
       Bahrain. Both deals are revolutionary in scope: By normalizing ties and focusing on business, trade, and
       travel, these “warm peace” agreements go beyond the often tenuous “cold peace” that Egypt and Jordan
       made with the Jewish state decades ago. Not only do the UAE and Bahrain deals set the stage for a sea
       change in Arab-Israeli relations, but they might even present a novel opportunity to finally solve the most
       intractable issue between the two sides: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
       Ties between Israel and the Gulf have grown exponentially in recent years. Underpinned by the common
       threat from Iran, what began as whispers of covert intelligence cooperation gradually transformed to
       increasingly public signs of amity. Gulf leaders have acknowledged Israel’s right to exist and defend itself,
       Israel’s flag has flown at sporting events, and Israeli officials have been allowed to visit. This process
       culminated in last month’s UAE-Israel deal, which seeks to break a major taboo in Arab-Israeli relations
       by establishing deep bilateral ties not just between Israeli and Emirati officialdom or security
       establishments, but between their peoples. That deal provides the necessary cover for other Gulf states
       to follow suit.
51.    Which of the following is a signification emanating from the UAE Bahrain Deal with Israel?
       (a) Embassies and exchange ambassadors.
       (b) The agreement shows how the Arab countries are gradually decoupling themselves from the
           Palestine question.
       (c) Full diplomatic ties will be established between Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain which
           will have a positive impact on the entire region.
       (d) All of the above.
53.    What is the name of the accord signed between the three countries?
       (a) Abraham Accords
       (b) Peace Treaty
       (c) Muslim-Jews peace accord
       (d) Israel- Arab peace accord
54.    Which of the following country had signed the first ever peace deal with Israel?
       (a) Jordon
       (b) Egypt
       (c) India
       (d) USA
55.    What is the name of the Prime Minister’s Benjamin Netanyahu Political Party?
       (a) Likud
       (b) Blue and White
       (c) Labor Party
       (d) United Torah Judaism
56.    Which of the following countries don’t come in the geographical area of the Middle East?
       (a) Jordan
       (b) Bahrain
       (c) Cyprus
       (d) Tajikistan
       Passage (Q.57-Q.62):In a unanimous decision, the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague on
       Friday ruled that India’s retrospective demand of Rs [1] as capital gains and withholding tax imposed on
       the British telecommunication company for a 2007 deal was “in breach of the guarantee of fair and
       equitable treatment”. The court has also asked India not to pursue the tax demand any more against
       Vodafone Group.
       As the name suggests, retrospective taxation allows a country to pass a rule on taxing certain products,
       items or services and deals and charge companies from a time behind the date on which the law is
       passed. Countries use this route to correct any anomalies in their taxation policies that have, in the past,
       allowed companies to take advantage of such loopholes. While governments often use a retrospective
       amendment to taxation laws to “clarify” existing laws, it ends up hurting companies that had knowingly or
       unknowingly interpreted the tax rules differently. Apart from India, many countries including the US, the
       UK, the Netherlands, Canada, Belgium, Australia and Italy have retrospectively taxed companies, which
       had taken the benefit of loopholes in the previous law.
58.    Though this is a case between India and Vodafone, which is a British company, Netherlands is also
       involved. How is that?
       (a) Vodafone had bought Hutchinson Whampoa in May 2007, which belongs to Netherlands
       (b) The Permanent Court of Arbitration is in Netherlands
       (c) India had signed a Bilateral Investment Treaty with Netherlands in 1995
       (d) Both (a) and (c)
59.    Which of the following articles of the UNCITRAL did the PCA cite to pass the ruling in favour of
       Vodafone?
       (a) Article 2                            (b) Article 3
       (c) Article 4                            (d) Article 5
61.    In which of the following cases can a capital gains tax be applied?
       (a) A loss making company is sold at a price lower than the cost that was requiredfor it to be set up
       (b) A company bought at some price gets resold at a much higher price than the original purchase price
       (c) A company being purchased by another country’s company
       (d) Any purchase of asset above the cost of 1 million USD will attract CGT
.      Passage (Q.63-Q.68):While telescopes offer glimpses of outer space by translating digital data into
       stunning images, NASA’s [1] has gone a step further by unveiling a new ‘sonification’ project that
       transforms data from astronomical images into audio. Users can now ‘listen’ to images of the Galactic
       Centre, the remains of a [2] called Cassiopeia A, as well as the Pillars of Creation Nebula, which are all
       located in a region around 26,000 light years away from Earth. The data has been collected by NASA’s
       Chandra X-Ray Observatory, Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Space Telescope — each of which is
       represented by a different musical ‘instrument’.
       NASA’s distant telescopes in space collect inherently digital data, in the form of ones and zeroes, before
       converting them into images. The images are essentially visual representations of light and radiation of
       different wavelengths in space, that can’t be seen by the human eye. This project has created a celestial
       concert of sorts by translating the same data into sound. Pitch and volume are used to denote the
       brightness and position of a celestial object or phenomenon. So far, the astronomers behind this project
       have released three examples made using data collected from some of the most distinct features in the
       sky — the Galactic Centre, Cassiopeia A, and Pillars of Creation Nebula.
67.    Who out of the following had theorized the concept of Black Holes?
       (a) Stephen Hawking
       (b) Albert Einstein
       (c) Nikola Tesla
       (d) George Westinghouse
68.    The "X-ray universe" refers to the universe as observed with telescopes designed to detect X-rays. How
       are X-rays produced in the cosmos?
       (a) When matter is hypercooled
       (b) When matter travels at 5 times the speed of sound
       (c) When matter is heated to millions of degrees
       (d) When matter is exposed near a black-hole
Directions (Q.69 – Q.106): Read the comprehension carefully and answer the questions based on it.
       Passage (Q.69-Q.73):The meaning of offer and acceptance is the basis of a contract. To form a contract,
       there must be an offer made by one party which is, in turn, accepted by another party, and then, in most
       cases goods and/or services must be exchanged between the two. An offer contains 2 parts. (1) The
       Expression: this is where the parties articulate in some form an inclination to enter into a contract and to
       make that contract legally binding upon the acceptance by both parties. The expression may take a wide
       variety of forms, from a personal discussion to a letter that lays out the basics of the terms. (2) The
       Intention: This is a slightly more vague concept, and it is often left up to the courts to determine whether
       or not intention was breached by a party. Essentially, intention involves a presumption by both parties
       that the agreement will be legally binding and comes down to the belief that neither party would begin
       discussions without the intent to live up to their side of the bargain.
       Offers can really cover anything, from a verbal agreement to provide a service, such as housesitting, to a
       detailed contract with legal terminology that one may find in an agreement to transfer real estate. It’s
       more than a promise, because it must be made with the understanding that what is being agreed to will
       be legally binding. It can be for the sale of goods, a pledge to perform a service, or even a promise not to
       engage in an activity. The more complex the agreement, the greater the likelihood will be that each party
       would engage legal counsel to negotiate the contract.
       Acceptance is the final agreement of both parties to consent to the terms of the offer. While it is common
       for the terms of the offer to be negotiated before acceptance, if it can be shown that through conduct and
       communications that the parties did in fact intend to agree to the final terms of the contract, then formal
       acceptance of an offer is not required for it to be legally binding. It is also not always necessary that
       acceptance be in the form of a signature on a piece of paper, although this is the most commonly
       accepted agreement between parties. For instance, if a party performs an act that would not otherwise
       happen, such as a painting contractor painting a house or a professional moving company moving
       furniture from one location to another, it would be interpreted as acceptance and agreement to the terms
       of the offer of payment for these services.
69.    Grant offered to buy 100 shares from Carriage Accident Insurance Co. The insurance company sent a
       letter of acceptance to Grant but the letter was lost in the post and never arrived. The liquidator of the
       insurance company sued Grant for the money owing for the shares. Was there a valid contract?
       (a) No, the acceptance was not communicated in a manner accessible to Grant.
       (b) No, as the letter and the acceptance never reached Grant.
       (c) Yes, as the acceptance was communicated and the contract was formed.
       (d) Yes, the contract was formed the moment the offer was accepted.
70.    Ravi is extremely thirsty. He says "I would probably give 5000 rupees to anyone who brought me water at
       this time." Akash hears this and expecting 5000 rupees, gets Ravi a bottle of water. Upon demanding the
       money, Ravi refuses. Can Akash go to court over this?
       (a) Yes. Ravi had made a general offer which was fulfilled by Akash.
       (b) Yes, Ravi’s offer constituted an expression of interest to enter into a binding contract.
       (c) Ravi could not have made a general offer. A specific offer to Akash is necessary for a contract to be
           formed.
       (d) No, there was no offer, merely a declaration of interest.
71.    Neha telegraphed to Aditi, writing: “Will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash
       price.” Aditi also replied by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lakh.” Neha immediately sent his
       consent through telegram stating: “I agree to buy the CAR for Rs. 20 lakh asked by you.” Aditi refused to
       sell the car. Decide
       (a) Aditi’s letter was the offer and Neha’s reply was the acceptance. There is a valid contract.
       (b) Aditi did not intend to make an offer. She can refuse to sell the CAR as there is no valid contract.
       (c) Aditi did not show any willingness to enter into a contract. In the absence of a legal intention, there
           can be no contract.
       (d) Neha’s letter itself did not constitute an offer. There is no valid contract.
72.    Arun and Ravi are supposed to be participating in a race. The night before the race, Ravi offers Arun that
       if he will not participate in the race Ravi will give him 2000 Rupees. Arun agrees. Decide
       (a) The contract is not valid for an offer asking to abstain is not a valid offer.
       (b) An offer asking to abstain as consideration for the contract is a valid offer.
       (c) A contract opposed to public policy cannot be a valid contract. Thus, this contract is invalid as it is
            unethical.
       (d) This is not a contract opposed to public policy. It is a contractual transaction and not unethical.
73.    Ashrut is a software engineer and works at InfoSys. When his employer asked him to resign from the job,
       and in return he would be paid 3 Lakh rupees, Ashrut did not say anything. However, 2 days later, Ashrut
       quit his job and then demanded his boss to pay him 3 Lakh rupees. Decide
       (a) Ashrut’s employer has entered into a binding contract with Ashrut. It was accepted by conduct.
       (b) Ashrut’s employer has not entered into a binding contract with Ashrut. There was no acceptance
           which is a fundamental requirement of a contract.
       (c) Ashrut’s employer has made an offer which is contrary to public policy. This cannot be a valid
           contract.
       (d) Ashrut’s employer has sought a consideration which is illegal. There cannot be a valid contract with
           an illegal consideration.
       Passage (Q.74-Q.79):Volentinon fit injuria is a defence of limited application in tort law. A direct
       translation of the latin phrase volentinon fit injuria is, 'to one who volunteers, no harm is done'. Where the
       defence of volenti applies it operates as a complete defence absolving the Defendant of all liability. It is
       often stated that the Claimant consents to the the risk of harm, however, the defence of volenti is much
       more limited in its application and should not be confused with the defence of consent in relation to
       trespass. The defence of volentinon fit injuria requires a freely entered and voluntary agreement by the
       Claimant, in full knowledge of the circumstances, to absolve the Defendant of all legal consequences of
       their actions. There is a considerable overlap with contributory negligence and since the introduction of
       the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945, the courts have been less willing to make a
       finding of volenti preferring to apportion loss between the parties rather than taking an all or nothing
       approach.
       The requirements of the defence are that there must be (1) a voluntary (2) agreement (3) made in full
       knowledge of the nature and extent of the risk. The agreement must be voluntary and freely entered for
       the defence of volentinon fit injuria to succeed. If the Claimant is not in a position to exercise free choice,
       the defence will not succeed. This element is most commonly seen in relation to employment
       relationships, rescuers and suicide.The second requirement for the defence of volentinon fit injuria is
       agreement. The agreement may be express or implied. An example of an express agreement would be
       where there exists a contractual term or notice. However, this would be subject to the controls of s.2 of
       the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. An implied agreement may exist where the Claimant's action in the
       circumstances demonstrates a willingness to accept not only the physical risks but also the legal
       risks. For knowledge, the test is subjective and not objective and in the context of an intoxicated claimant,
       the question is whether the claimant was so intoxicated that he was incapable of appreciating the nature
       of the risk.
74.    Two brothers Sanjay and Sunil had been working in Dheeraj’s quarry. They tried to test some detonators
       without taking requisite precautions and their act was in contravention of statutory provisions and also the
       orders of Dheeraj to both of them. One day, this act resulted in an explosion causing injury to Sunil. He
       brought an action against Dheeraj saying that his brother was equally responsible for the accident and
       that Dheeraj being the employer was held vicariously liable for his brother’s conduct. Decide.
       (a) Dheeraj is not liable because he had warned them not to do the dangerous act.
       (b) Dheeraj is not liable because he is protected by the defense of volentinon fit injuria.
       (c) Dheeraj is liable by the principle of vicarious liability.
       (d) Dheeraj is liable because there is a breach of statutory obligation.
75.    Ashay had to catch a flight to Mumbai. He was already late to the airport. He hailed ataxi on the road and
       asked the taxi-driver Agarwal to hurry to the airport at the maximum speedpossible. Agarwal, who was
       smelling strongly of liquor, started driving rashly. On the way to the airport, the taxi collided with a truck
       near the airport and Ashay was severely injured. He sued Agarwal for negligence.
       (a) Ashay would be successful because Agarwal was driving recklessly.
       (b) Ashay would not be successful because it was Ashay who asked Agarwal to drive fast and therefore,
           he voluntarily agreed to the risk.
       (c) Ashay would not be successful because he knew that Agarwal was drunk and therefore, he knew that
           the chances of accident were thereby increased.
       (d) Both (b) and (c)
76.    Ratnesh is a pilot who was supposed to fly the Joint Secretary of the Karnataka Health Ministry to Delhi
       for a meeting with the Prime Minister. Ratnesh instructed the Secretary about flight safety and asked to
       not use his phone as it could disturb flight navigation.The Secretary however used his phone and the
       navigation was disturbed which led to the flight crashing.It turns out that the system was not of a good
       quality but would not have failed if not for the disturbance. The Secretary sued the airlines.
       (a) The Secretary would be successful because the airlines had a bad navigation system.
       (b) The Secretary would not be successful because it was him who used his mobile phone and therefore,
           he voluntarily agreed to the risk.
       (c) The Secretary would not be successful because he knew that the system was not in a good condition
           and therefore, he knew that the chances of accident were thereby increased.
       (d) Both (b) and (c)
77.    In which of the following circumstances, is the exercise of a free choice most likely?
       (a) A politician agreeing to favour a certain party on their request and award them a tender thus risking
           corruption charges.
       (b) A teacher agreeing to award more marks to the principal’s son risking outrage from parents
       (c) A smuggler agreeing to smuggle guns instead of a banned species of flower thus risking significantly
           higher punishment
       (d) A doctor agreeing to turn off the ventilator of a patient upon being threatened by goons to do so thus
           risking disciplinary action.
78.    Venkata was intoxicated and in a state of panic when he asked the helicopter pilot to land on ice for he
       feared that there was storm ahead. This was not a practice usually done by pilots.The helicopter crashed.
       When the accident occurred, Venkata sued the pilot for negligence. The pilot claimed volentinon fit injuria
       (a) Venkata consented to the risk for he was in a state of panic
       (b) Venkata did not consent to the risk for he was intoxicated
       (c) Venkata consented to the risk for he asked the pilot to land on ice
       (d) The liability shall depend on the level of Venkata’sintoxication
79.    Please refer to the facts above. Venkata did not ask the pilot to land on ice but was constantly looking at
       the weather and discussing with his co passengers about the safest option being the possibility of landing
       on ice. The driver anticipating that Venkata might be panicking, starting descending on ice.Venkata did
       not say anything. The accident occurred.
       (a) Venkata consented to landing on ice by not objecting
       (b) Venkata did not consent expressly to the landing on ice which was required
       (c) Venkata should not have panicked in the first place
       (d) Venkata did not consent. Mere silence cannot be construed as active consent
       Passage (Q.80-Q.85):Under common law, there are seven types of intentional torts: assault, battery,
       false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, conversion, and intentional infliction of
       emotional distress. Trespass to chattels refers to the use of property without permission of the owner.
       Trespass to chattels can be easily confused with the tort of conversion because they both deal wrongful
       interference of personal property.
       A trespass to chattels is an intentional interference with another person's lawful possession of a personal
       property. A "chattel" refers to any personal property, moving or unmoving. Trespass to chattels does not
       apply to real property or any interest in land. In order to prove trespass to chattels, it must be shown that
       (1) there was an intent to trespass. Merely intending to do the act is enough to show this element of
       trespass. You don't necessarily need to show intent to harm a specific person. (2) The second element is
       lack of the owner’s consent. There must be an unauthorized, unlawful interference, which means the
       person interfered with or dispossessed the chattel without the owner's permission. Such consent must be
       free. The third element is that there must be interference of chattel. A person commits a trespass to
       chattel by (1) dispossessing another of the chattel, (2) using or intermeddling with a chattel in the
       possession of another, or (3) damaging the chattel. Interference does include dispossession of a chattel,
       but it must be something short of conversion. A mistake of ownership is not a valid defense to a trespass
       to chattels. In other words, it doesn't matter if the person didn't know the property belonged to you.
       Possessing or damaging the property itself is enough to show interference.
       In general, a person will be held liable for a trespass to chattels in any of the following situations:
       1. The person dispossesses the other of the chattel.
       2. The chattel is impaired as to its condition, quality, or value.
       3. The possessor is deprived of the use of the chattel for a substantial time.
       4. Bodily harm is caused to the possessor, or harm is caused to some person or thing in which the
       possessor has a legally protected interest.
       In a trespass to chattels claim, you can only recover actual damages (as opposed to nominal damages).
       Actual damages are measured by the diminished value of the chattel that resulted from the defendant's
       actions.
80.    Arjun stole Anand’s phone in the Delhi Metro. Arjun registered an FIR. When the police finally traced
       Arjun’s phone at Anand’s place, Anand could not find the phone in his possession. It was found that
       Ahuja had taken the phone from Anand’s house and was using it. Anand filed a suit.
       (a) Ahuja is liable for trespass to chattel as there was intentional interference with Anand’s property
       (b) Ahuja is not liable for trespass to chattel as he did not have the intent to commit the tort
       (c) Ahuja is liable for trespass to chattel as Anand was in possession of property
       (d) Ahuja is not liable for trespass to chattel as Anand was not in lawful possession of the property
81.    Please refer to the facts above. Infuriated, Anand along with his 5 friends went in to Ahuja’s house and
       threw away his property from his house on the road. Decide
       (a) Anand is liable for trespass to chattel as he interfered with Ahuja’s property by throwing it on the road.
       (b) Anand is not liable for trespass to chattel as he did not use Ahuja’s property
       (c) Anand is liable for trespass to chattel as he intentionally committed the tort
       (d) Anand is not liable for trespass to chattel
82.    Munna Bhai is the goon of the locality and gets houses emptied for builders. One such house belonged
       to Dr. Anand. Munna Bhai threw away Dr. Anand’s property and occupied his house.
       (a) MunnaBhai is liable for trespass to chattel as he interfered with Dr. Anand’s property by occupying it.
       (b) MunnaBhai is liable for trespass to chattel as he intentionally committed the tort.
       (c) MunnaBhai is not liable for trespass to chattel as he interfered with his land and house.
       (d) MunnaBhai is a goon and should be punished.
83.    Apurv bets with his friends that since his wallet is old, he will pick someone’s pocket and use their wallet.
       Apurv acts on this bet and picks Baikunth’s pocket. Decide
       (a) Apurv is liable for trespass to chattel as he intentionally picked Baikunth’s pocket
       (b) Apurv is not liable for trespass to chattel as he did not specifically announce evil intent against
           Baikunth
       (c) Apurv is liable for trespass to chattel. Intent against specific person is not required.
       (d) Apurv is not liable for trespass to chattel as he only acted in pursuit of a bet
84.    A is B’s friend. A wants to take his book lying in B’s cupboard and asks for the lock code to his cupboard.
       B refused. A was curious about what was lying in B’s cupboard so he spiked A’s water with a medicine
       that made him feel drowsy. A asked B for his lock code and B told him. A accessed B’s cupboard and
       took a valuable book away.
       (a) A is liable for trespass to chattel as he intentionally deprived B of his property.
       (b) A is not liable for trespass to chattel for he took B’s consent before accessing his cupboard
       (c) A is liable for trespass to chattel as B’s consent was not free
       (d) A is not liable for trespass to chattel
85.    Please refer to the facts above. A’s book had been kept by B for a long while now. Despite repeated
       reminders, B did not return the same. A sneaked into B’s cupboard and took his own book. However, it
       turns out that A did not take his book but B’s book by mistake.
       (a) A is liable for trespass to chattel as he intentionally deprived B of his property.
       (b) A is not liable for trespass to chattel for he took B’s consent before accessing his cupboard
       (c) A is liable for trespass to chattel as mistake of ownership is not a valid defence
       (d) A is not liable for trespass to chattel as B was not giving his book
       Passage (Q.86-Q.91):Extortion is a criminal offense, which occurs when a person either obtains money
       or property from another through coercion or intimidation or threatens one with physical harm unless they
       are paid money or property. Euphemistically, refraining from doing harm is sometimes called protection.
       Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property
       is not required to commit the offense. Making a threat of violence or a lawsuit which refers to a
       requirement of a payment of money or property to halt future violence or lawsuit is sufficient to commit
       the offense.
       Section 383. Extortion.—Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to
       any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property
       or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security,
       commits “extortion”.
       The element of dishonesty is the essence of this offence. The chiefelement in the offence of extortion is
       that the inducement must be dishonest. Itis not sufficient that there should be wrongful loss caused to an
       individual butthe person putting that individual in fear of injury must have the intention that wrongful loss
       should be caused. Where the accused honestly believed that thecomplainant had taken the money
       belonging to him (the accused), an attemptto get it back cannot be said to be with the intention of causing
       wrongful loss tohim.
       The essential elements of the crime of extortion can be enumerated as:
       1. It should be shown that there was a force to create threat or fear in the victim of the wrongful act.
       2. The wrongdoer must be having some interest in putting the victim under fear of any sort of threat or
           injury.
       3. There should be the presence of a dishonest intention.
       4. Such threat or fear of injury in is caused on to the other person in order to force him to transfer any of
           his property or any other valuable item.
86.    K on finding out that Z has been having an affair outside of his marriage, threatens to publish a
       defamatory libel concerning Z unless Z gives him money. Z refuses to do so. Has K has committed
       extortion?
       (a) No, as K has not threatened any harm or injury to his person.
       (b) No, as Z has not handed him any money, hence there was no loss.
       (c) Yes, as K has caused a fear of injury to reputation in turn of causing him wrongful loss.
       (d) Yes, as K has dishonest intention to get a wrongful gain out of Z’s predicament.
87.    Z threatens D to sit inside his vehicle without causing any ruckus or he would harm him physically. Later
       he called the family members of D to ask for ransom for the release of D or he would cause him harm.
       Can Z have been said to cause extortion?
       (a) No as Z did not threaten D to cause himself any wrongful gain or loss of valuable property to D.
       (b) Yes, as Z caused a fear of injury to D for non-compliance to his measures.
       (c) No, as Z caused extortion against D’s family, but to D it is not extortion but could be a case of
           abduction.
       (d) Yes, as Z has extorted both D and his family by threatening injury in turn for unlawful gain of valuable
           property.
88.    ‘A’ threatens Z that he will keep Z’s child in wrongful confinement, unless Z will sign and deliver to ‘A’ a
       promissory note binding Z to pay certain monies to A. Z signs and delivers the note. Decide?
       (a) Yes, as there was the presence of a dishonest intention.
       (b) Yes, as it was in order to force him to transfer any of his property or any other valuable item.
       (c) No, as there was no threat of injury to his person, it was to his son.
       (d) No, as there was no dishonest intention as promissory note is a future contract and does not require
            immediate transfer of valuable property.
89.    A, by putting Z in fear of grievous hurt, dishonestly induces Z to sign or affix his seal to a blank paper and
       deliver it to A. Z signs and delivers the paper to A. Has A committed extortion?
       (a) Yes, it is as the blank paper can be turned to valuable security later.
       (b) Yes, as he has threatened injury to Z for unlawful purposes.
       (c) No, as a blank paper is not a valuable property, hence he couldn’t have extorted him for any wrongful
           loss.
       (d) No, as all the elements of extortion are not fulfilled in the above instance.
90.    Mr. Y, unhappy with his daughter’s choice of groom, threated to harm himself if she did not break of such
       engagement and marry a boy of his choice. Scared for her father’s life, she agreed and broke of the
       bond. Has Mr. Y committed extortion?
       (a) Yes, as he induced harm and injury to force her to commit an act against her will.
       (b) No, as did not aim to have any gain of property through this act.
       (c) Yes, as he had dishonest intention to achieve his will in her marriage.
       (d) No, as family matters are not in the subject matter of extortion.
91.    Bank of Hindustan, used to give out small loans against collateral to their customers. Mr. Z took a loan
       against his Car and had to return the same with interest in certain installments. When a few installments
       failed, the bank warned him against seizing his car in case of next default. Mr. Z filed a suit of extortion.
       Decide.
       (a) Yes, as the bank aims to harm the property of Z for gain of money.
       (b) No, as the bank is duly owed that sum along with the collateral, and it’s not a dishonest intention.
       (c) No, as the bank has a right to make any threats in case of defaulting customer.
       (d) Yes, as inducing fear to gain is enough to establish extortion regardless of the fact that the loss was
            caused or not.
       Passage (Q.92-Q.95):In the wake of the migrant crisis, several states have amended existing labour
       laws, either suspending them altogether or increasing working hours. It is axiomatic that these
       amendments must be in consonance with the fundamental rights guaranteed to labour, as also the
       Directive Principles of State Policy which enjoin the state to further the interests of labour in its policies.
       Any legal changes will inevitably be challenged in court and must meet constitutional standards to survive
       such a challenge.
       To be compelled to work violates Article 23 of the Constitution of India, which provides a “right against
       exploitation” prohibiting human trafficking, begar, and forced labour. In PUDR vs Union of India (1982),
       the Supreme Court held that laws protecting contract labour and inter-state migrant workmen were
       intended to ensure basic human dignity; violating these laws would violate the right to life under Article
       21. In PUDR, the Court also noted that no one would willingly work for less than the minimum wage
       without some force or compunction. Yet, rather than encouraging workers to return by securing wages
       and improving working conditions, the amendments introduced by the states are removing basic labour
       law protections.
       The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), though unenforceable, are constitutionally-mandated
       goals for the State to work towards when making laws. The DPSP enjoin the State to ensure that the
       “operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of
       production to the common detriment” (Article 39), to “make effective provision for securing the right to
       work” (Article 41), “to secure to all workers a living wage, conditions of work ensuring a decent standard
       of life.” (Article 43). It is tempting to see the pandemic as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to push through
       labor reforms. Even so, it is unclear that the whole scale abrogation of the labor law system benefits
       either labor or industry. If anything, this is an apt moment for the governments, at both the Centre and in
       the states, to renew their commitment to the DPSP.
92.    A competent court passed a sentence to a convict providing for a rigorous imprisonment for a period of
       seven years. In furtherance to the same, the jailor assigns the prisoner for breaking stones and puts him
       as a labourer for an ongoing construction operation inside the jail. The prisoner has not consented for
       doing such manual work. Further, he challenges the work to be forced and thus violative of Article 23.
       Decide.
       (a) The jailor has committed an offence putting him for work against his will.
       (b) The jailor has committed no offence as the circumstances would alter in case of a prisoner.
       (c) The jailor has committed an offence due to absence of remuneration.
       (d) The jailor has committed no offence but the court provided for rigorous imprisonment.
93.    Meethesh has a family of 6 members. He is sole bread earner of the family which puts an excessive
       financial burden on him. Due to such circumstances, he decides to work in the factory of Mr Bajaj at a
       rate less than the minimum wage. Whether this would amount to forced labour? Decide.
       (a) This cannot be considered forced labour as it is out of willingness of Meethesh.
       (b) This cannot be considered forced labour as he is paid for the services from by him.
       (c) This cannot be considered as forced labour but would be a violation of DPSP.
       (d) This can be considered as forced labour as due to the external factors the consent is not free.
94.    Aman is a diligent and laborious employee. He works for Namit who runs his own business. With an
       intention of further growth, Aman decides to work at a different place. When Namit finds out, he threatens
       him of false prosecution and imprisonment on account of a false charge of stealing from the business.
       This was done to retain him in the business. Would this amount to forced labor. Decide.
       (a) No, it would be covered under malicious prosecution.
       (b) No, as reasonable compensation is being paid to Aman by Namit.
       (c) Yes, as the willingness is induced by threat of prosecution and imprisonment.
       (d) Yes, as the remuneration was not enough so he intended to shift to a different place.
95.    Mannu Singh is a daily wage worker who took a loan of Rs. 35,000/- from the moneylender, Maniram.
       The loan was to be utilised for the purposes of marriage of the daughter of Mannu Singh. In exchange of
       the loan, Maniram asked Mannu to work on his farm for a period of 15 years where he shall be provided
       with food, shelter and a remuneration of Rs. 500 every month. Constrained by the circumstances, Mannu
       Singh accepts the offer. A welfare organisation finds out about the arrangement and files a petition on the
       ground thatMannu Singh is being forced to work. Decide.
       (a) The petition will not succeed as the Mannu is being provided with food and shelter along with the
           remuneration.
       (b) The petition will not succeed as the arrangement is entered into by the consent of Mannu Singh.
       (c) The petition will succeed as this amount to exploitation by Maniram.
       (d) The petition will succeed due to lack of free consent.
       Passage (Q.96-Q.101):Rape is a crime, which has a devastating effect on the survivors; it has been
       described as a “beginning of a nightmare”. The aftershocks include depression, fear, guilt-complex,
       suicidal-action, diminished sexual interest. etc., “one becomes afraid of’……..writes a victim, “half the
       human race”. Referring to the pitiable condition of women in society Mr. Justice S. Ahmad observed that
       “unfortunately, a woman in our country, belongs to a class or group of society who are in a
       disadvantaged position on account of several social barriers and impediments and have therefore, been
       victims of tyranny at the hands of men with whom they, unfortunately, under the Constitution “enjoy,
       equal status”. “Women also have the right to life and liberty; they also have the right to be respected and
       treated as equal citizens. Their honour and dignity cannot be touched or violated. They also have the
       right to lead an honorable and peaceful life”. Rape is a stigma which exists in the society from a long
       time. The dictionary meaning of word rape is “the ravishing or violation of a woman.” She is traumatized
       after the event; it is very difficult for a woman to come out of this trauma. Rape in India is a cognizable
       offence. There are many provisions in various Acts. The word rape is legally defined u/s 375 of Indian
       Penal Code, 1860. It defines the rape and also prescribes its punishment. Whenever a man penetrates or
       does sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent or will it amounts to rape. Penetration here
       means that only a slightest of the touch of penis to vagina amounts to rape, unruptured hymen of woman
       does not prove that rape was not committed.
       The Supreme Court has expressed strong disapproval of courts casting a stigma on the victim’s
       character, but stigmatization continues, leading to acquittals. Setting aside one acquittal by a Ludhiana
       court that labeled the victim with ‘loose character’ while interpreting her consent to sex, the Supreme
       Court in a 1996 judgment said, “The trial court interpreted that the victim was habituated to sexual
       intercourse just because the speculum the doctor used entered her vagina easily and hence she was of
       loose character. These observations lack sobriety expected of a judge. No stigma should be cast against
       a victim of sex crime who is on trial”.
96.    Madhur meets Anisha at a party where both of them exchange pleasantries. After a while, when both of
       them are alone Madhur imposes himself on Anisha and forcefully engages into a sexual intercourse even
       when she protests for the same. Decide.
       (a) This shall amount to rape due to absence of consent by Anisha.
       (b) This shall not amount to rape due to an exchange of pleasantries.
       (c) This shall amount to rape due to a sexual intercourse between them
       (d) This shall not amount to rape but shall fall under assault.
97.    Disha and Harsh have known each other for a long time and have engaged in sexual intercourse at
       various instances. All such sexual intercourses involved the consent of the individuals. However, at one
       instance, both the individuals had a sexual intercourse for which Disha did not consent to. Whether this
       would amount to the offence of Rape. Decide.
       (a) This shall not amount to rape as they had sexual intercourse at earlier occasions for which she
           consented to.
       (b) This shall not amount to rape as consent is vague in the last case.
       (c) This shall amount to rape as there was no consent and previous consent is not relevant.
       (d) Both (a) and (b)
98.    Apoorva went to get together of her college friends. Ramesh was also there and both of then exchanged
       a pleasant conversation. They decided to engage in a sexual activity. Apoorva consented to one
       particular type of sexual activity. However, when they got to the point of intercourse, she withdrew her
       consent. Would this amount to the offence of Rape? Decide.
       (a) No, as she consented for the sexual activity before the beginning of the intercourse.
       (b) No, as such withdrawal at such a later stage would not amount to withdrawal.
       (c) Yes, as she withdrew her consent for that particular sexual activity.
       (d) Yes, as she consented for only one type of sexual activity.
99.    Rahul engaged in a sexual intercourse with Simran who was 15 years old. The parents of Simran decide
       to file a case against Rahul for the offence of rape. However, he contends that the intercourse had the
       consent of Simran therefore cannot be categorized as rape. Decide.
       (a) Rahul is not liable as the act was consented by Simran.
       (b) Rahul is not liable as the parents cannot file the case bur only Simran
       (c) Rahul is liable as the consent of Simran cannot be considered a valid consent.
       (d) Rahul is liable as the parents of Simran can decide for their daughter.
100. Choose an appropriate reason of the following for the lack of gender neutral laws:
     (a) Women are the ones who are the victims of such heinous crime.
     (b) Women cannot commit rape due to biological reasons.
     (c) Men are the aggressors in the majority of the cases.
     (d) Women are the disadvantaged group due to stunted societal structure so they need more protection.
101. Robin is a police officer who met Malaika at a party. After the party, he told her that if she did not engage
     into a sexual intercourse with him then he would put her in jail and harass the family members on account
     of the powers he possess through his profession. They both enter into a sexual activity wherein she does
     not protest or explicitly resist. Decide.
     (a) Robin shall be liable as the consent was obtained by threat.
     (b) Robin shall not be liable as there was no explicit resistance.
     (c) Robin shall not liable due the existence of inherent consent.
     (d) Robin shall be liable for coercion but not the offence of rape.
       Passage (Q.102-Q.106):The Indian Penal Code provides some general defences under chapter four that
       exonerate criminal liability which based on the premise that though the person committed the offence, he
       cannot be held liable. This is because at the time of commission of offence, person was justified of
       his/her acts, or there was absence of mensrea. However, it is not all acts that are to be punished. There
       are certain defences provided under the ambit of Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 from Sections 76 to 106.
       Mistake of fact arises when accused misunderstood some fact that negates an element of crime. This
       legal weapon can be used, where accused succeeds to prove that he/she was mistaken to the existence
       of some facts or ignorant of the existence of such facts. It is a condition that such mistake must pertain to
       fact not law. Section 76 and 79 of IPC contains the provision of mistake of fact. Such mistake must be
       reasonable and must be of fact and not of law. The legal maxim, "ignorantiafactiexcusatiignorantiajuris
       non excusat" which means ignorance of fact is an excuse, but ignorance of law is no excuse. So it is a
       basic requirement to be get protected under the sphere of this defence that mistake must be of fact.
       Section 76: Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact believing himself bound, by law.Nothing is
       an offence which is done by a person who is, or who by reason of a mistake of fact and not by reason of
       a mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do it.
       Section 79: Act done by a person justified, or by mistake of fact believing himself justified, by law.Nothing
       is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of a mistake of fact
       and not by reason of a mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing it.
       Thus, the general defences enshrined under IPC are of paramount importance in establishing the
       parameters of criminal offences. Criminal liability makes a person liable for the acts which are prohibited
       by law. Indian Penal Code took cognizance of fact that all acts are not to be punished. The acts devoid of
       mensrea are exempted from criminal liability.
102. Before going to the Church, Zeeshan fired the gun and left it empty. However, during his absence,
     Chester visits the house and takes the gun for shooting and while keeping it back leaves it loaded. Later
     on the same day, Zeeshan takes the gun and touches the trigger. The gun goes off and kills his wife who
     was sitting in front of him. Decide.
     (a) Zeeshan is guilty because he was negligent and that killed the wife.
     (b) Zeeshan is not guilty as he was under a mistake of fact.
     (c) Zeeshan is guilty and liability should be absolute.
     (d) Zeeshan is guilty as such a weapon should be handled with great care.
103. Chulbul is a renowned police officer who is ordered to catch a dangerous criminal named Hari Pandey.
     After due enquiry in good faith, Chulbul, believing Prasoon to be Hari Pandey, arrests him. Decide the
     liability of arresting a wrong individual and curtailing his fundamental rights.
     (a) Chulbul will be liable as this impacted the fundamental rights of Prasoon.
     (b) Chulbul will be liable as his enquiry was deficient making an innocent suffer.
     (c) Chulbul will not be liable as he was acting under the orders.
     (d) Chulbul will not be liable since he acted in good faith.
104. A complaint was made by a nurse engaged with a civil dispensary against the accused who was the
     President of the Municipal office at that moment. He wrote a letter to the surgeon on the basis of the
     allegations made by the renowned men of the community that the nurse had a bad reputation for having
     illicit relations with a lot of men. The letter indicated that the accused approved of such allegations on the
     nurse. However, there existed no proof that there was an enquiry made on such facts. Decide.
     (a) The President of the Municipal office is not liable as it could be mistake of fact.
     (b) The President of the Municipal office is not liable as he did not say anything about the nurse.
     (c) The President of the Municipal office is not liable as he just the information further.
     (d) The President of the Municipal office is liable as he failed to take due care.
105. Seeta and Geeta had a strained relationship. At one instance, certain expensive utensils were stolen
     from the house of Seeta so she thought of a plan to catch hold of the thief. She thought that the thief
     would come to the only village pond to fetch water and at that moment she will get hold of it. In
     pursuance to the same, she hid herself behind a tree and when she saw Geeta filing water in the utensils
     gave a blow with a lathi on her head. Geeta sustained injuries and filed a case against Seeta. Decide.
     (a) Seeta is not liable as this would be considered a mistake of fact.
     (b) Seeta is not liable as she was just trying to recover her stolen property.
     (c) Seeta is liable as there was a complete lack of good faith.
     (d) Seeta is liable as Geeta sustained injuries because of her blow.
106. Jadegas & Sons is a renowned firm in the business of import and export. They have been dealing with
     edible and non-edible oil since the last fifty years. On one day, they were charged with the offence of
     importing non- edible coconuts oil under an open general license. They pleaded that they believed it to
     be a non-canalized item and therefore acted in good faith. Decide.
     (a) They are not liable as the factual information suggest that they acted in good faith.
     (b) They are liable as such act cannot be considered bona fide when they have been functioning for such
         a long period.
     (c) They are liable as the act was under mistake of law which is not excusable.
     (d) They are not liable as they did not possess any dishonest intention.
Directions (Q.107-Q.136): Read and analyse the passage and answer the questions:-
       Passage (Q.107-Q.111):Like all other animals, our species evolved by gradual processes of natural
       selection that equipped us to survive and reproduce within a certain environmental niche. Unlike other
       animals, however, our species managed to escape its inherited biological role and take control of its own
       destiny. It began to innovate, actively reshaping its way of life, its environment and, eventually, the planet
       itself. How did we do it? What set our species, Homo sapiens, apart from the rest?
       Searching for just one event, a decisive change in culture or brain structure, would probably be a
       mistake.
       What caused our species to break out of the pattern set by archaic humans? Again, there were probably
       many factors. But from my perspective as someone who studies the human mind, one development
       stands out as of special importance. There is a mental ability we possess today that must have emerged
       at some point in our history, and whose emergence would have vastly enhanced our ancestors’ creative
       powers.
       The ability I mean is that of hypothetical thinking – the ability to detach one’s mind from the here and
       now, and consciously think about other possibilities. This is the key to sustained innovation and creativity,
       and to the development of art, science and technology.
       How did hypothetical thinking develop? I want to introduce two suggestions, one by the Israeli linguist
       Daniel Dor, the other by the American philosopher Daniel Dennett. Neither is directly about hypothetical
       thinking but, combined, they offer a compelling picture of how humans acquired the capacity for it.
       Dor’s proposal, made in his book The Instruction of the Imagination (2015), is about the nature and
       origins of language. In outline, the story is this. As their societies became more collaborative, archaic
       humans needed to communicate in more complex ways, warning, assisting, advising and instructing each
       other. They did this pantomime-fashion, using gestures, expressions and vocal mimicry to direct attention
       to what they meant. Their object was what Dor calls ‘experiential mutual-identification’– to get their
       interlocutors to share and acknowledge their experience, to see what they saw, feel what they felt, react
       as they reacted. They were highly skilled at it. Yet this experiential-mimetic form of communication had a
       serious limitation. Because it worked by sharing experience, it was limited to communication about things
       that were on hand to be experienced.
107. Which of the following, if true, will strengthen the argument that no single event is responsible for a
     decisive change in culture or brain structure?
     (a) The lifestyle of archaic humans remained largely static over vast periods of time, with few, if any,
         signs of artistic activity or technical innovation.
     (b) For more than 1.5 million years, archaic humans (earlier Homo species, such as Homo erectus) had
         been slowly diverging from the other great apes, developing a way of life marked by increased
         collaboration.
     (c) Things started to change only in the past 300,000 years, with the emergence of our own species and
         our cousins the Neanderthals, and even then the pace of change didn’t quicken much until 40-60,000
         years ago.
     (d) All of the above
110. Which of the following best explains how “experiential mutual-identification” works?
     (a) You could communicate that there was a wolf approaching only if you could get your hearers to see
         the creature for themselves.
     (b) You could communicate that there was a wolf approaching by the use of hand gestures.
     (c) You couldn’t communicate about a wolf approaching at all
     (d) You could communicate that there was a wolf approaching by the use of sounds.
111. Which of the following would have been true about archaic humans?
     (a) The static nature of their lifestyle suggests that they lived in the present, their attention locked on to
         the world, and their behaviour driven by habit and environmental stimuli.
     (b) In the course of their daily activities, they might accidentally hit on a better way of doing something,
         and so gradually acquire new habits and skills, but they didn’t actively think up innovations for
         themselves.
     (c) Both a and b
     (d) Neither a nor b
       Passage (Q.112-Q.117):At first glance, the holy basil is little more than an unprepossessing plant. It has
       purplish flowers and broad, flat leaves that track sunlight throughout the day. However, it's what the basil
       does at night that has propelled this humble plant into the scientific spotlight. Hours before the dawn, it
       springs into action, turning its leaves to face the anticipated direction of the sunrise. The basil seems to
       remember where and when the sun has come up on previous days, and acts to make sure it can gather
       as much light energy as possible each morning. When scientists try to confuse basilsin their labs by
       swapping the location of the light source, the plants simply learn the new orientation.
       What does it even mean to say that a basil can learn and remember the location of the sunrise?The idea
       that plants can behave intelligently, let alone learn or form memories, was a fringe notion until quite
       recently. Memories are thought to be so fundamentally cognitive that some theorists argue that they’re a
       necessary and sufficient marker of whether an organism can do the most basic kinds of thinking.Surely
       memory requires a brain, and plants lack even the rudimentary nervous systems of bugs and worms.
       However, over the past decade or so, this view has been forcefully challenged. The basil isn't an
       anomaly.Plants are not simply organic, passive automata. We now know that they can sense and
       integrate information about dozens of different environmental variables, and that they use this knowledge
       to guide flexible, adaptive behaviour.
       For example, plants can recognise whether nearby plants are kin or unrelated, and adjust their foraging
       strategies accordingly. The flowerPortulaceagrandifloraaka moss rose, is one of several species that
       tends to devote a greater share of resources to growing leaves rather than roots when put with strangers
       – atactic apparently geared towards competing for sunlight, an imperative that is diminished when you
       are growing next to your siblings. Plants also mount complex, targeted defences in response to
       recognising specific predators. The small, flowering Arabidopsis thaliana, aka thale or mouse-ear cress,
       can detect the vibrations caused by caterpillars munching on it and so releases oils and chemicals to
       repel the insects.
       Plants also communicate with one another, and other organisms, such as parasites and microbes, using
       a variety of channels - including ‘mycorrhizal networks’ of fungus that link up the root systems of multiple
       plants, like some kind of subterranean internet. Perhaps it's not really so surprising, then,that plants learn
       and use memories for prediction and decision making.
112. Which of the following can be inferred about holy basil from the passage?
     1. it is generally considered unattractive.
     2. its leaves adjust themselves to face the direction and time of sunrise
     3. all the light energy it needs for a day, it gathers in the early hours of the morning
     4. it has been proven to have cognitive abilities.
     (a) 1, 2 and 3           (b) 2, 3 and 4          (c) 1, 2 and 4         (d) 1, 3 and 4
115. Which of the following does the author provide as a reason for a recent change in scientific beliefs?
     (a) plant behaviour shows strong signs of memory despite not having a nervous system.
     (b) plants do not have even a rudimentary nervous system
     (c) plants can identify the difference between friends and foes, and control their growth accordingly.
     (d) memories are fundamentally cognitive, and therefore necessary for thinking
117. The author provides which of the following examples to argue that plants can learn from memory ?
     (a) The adjustment of basil leaves towards the direction of sunrise
     (b) the defence strategy of Arabidopsis thaliana.
     (c) the interplant network of fungus
     (d) all the above.
       Passage (Q.118-Q.123):Adam Smith is the best known of all economists, and is typically hailed as the
       founding father of the dismal science itself.Furthermore, he’s usually portrayed as not only an early
       champion of economic theory, but of the superiority of markets over government planning. In other words,
       Smith is now known both, as the founder of economics, and as an ideologue for the political Right. Yet,
       despite being widely believed, both these claims are at best misleading, and at worst outright false.
       Smith’s popular reputation as an economist is a remarkable twist of fate for a man who spent most of his
       life as a somewhat reclusive academic thinker. Employed as professor of moral philosophy at the
       University of Glasgow, the majority of Smith’s teaching was in ethics, politics, jurisprudence and rhetoric,
       and for most of his career he was known for his first book,‘TheTheory Of Moral Sentiments’.His
       professional identity was firmly that of a philosopher - not least because the discipline of
       ‘economics’didn’t emerge until the 19th century, by which time Smith was long dead. He died in July
       1790, just as the French revolution was getting into full swing.
       Admittedly, Smith's reputation as an economist isn't entirely mysterious.His oft-quoted ‘An Inquiry Into
       The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations’ was undoubtedly important in the eventual formation
       - in the next century - of the discipline of economics.But even here things are not as straightforward as
       they appear. For ‘the wealth of nations’ – a 1000 page doorstopper that blends history,ethics, psychology
       and political philosophy - bears little resemblance to the ahistorical and highly mathematical nature of
       most current economic theory. If anything,Smith’sbest known book is a work of political economy, a once-
       prevalent field of enquiry that suffered a striking decline in the latter half of the 20th century.
       Smith’s reputation, however, began to get away from him early on.Shortly after publication,‘the wealth of
       nations’ was fêted in the British Parliament by the Whig leader Charles James Fox. Ironically,Fox later
       admitted that he had never actually read it.Indeed,Smith suspected that those quickest to sing his praises
       had failed to understand the main arguments of his work.He later described ‘the wealth of nations’ as a
       ‘very violent attack upon the whole commercial system of Great Britain’.Despite this, his vocal political
       cheerleaders in Parliament continued to prop up the very system that Smith was railing against.
123. Why does the author refer to the confession of Charles James Fox?
     (a) to suggest that Adam Smith's work was too difficult to understand for most people of his times.
     (b) to prove that pretence was rampant amongst British politicians during that time.
     (c) to highlight how Adam Smith was applauded by those he criticized.
     (d) to imply that the British Parliament unanimously considered ‘the wealth of nations’ a seminal work in
         economics.
124. Domestic air travel in India is not, of course, a monopoly. Indian airlines have had to contend with some
     competition for many years now. But where liberalization and increased competition have lowered prices
     and benefited consumers in a number of sectors, the price of domestic air travel has been remarkably
     sticky. One reason is the comfortable co-habitation with Indian Airlines as the price leader. But its
     privately-owned competition has been gradually intensifying, and improving the quality of service. A price
     war is unlikely, however, as these airlines have, over time, learnt to live together.
     Which of the following, if true, would cast most doubt on the accuracy of the prediction made in the last
     sentence?
     (a) The increasing efforts to improve service are most visible in the private airlines.
     (b) Many private airlines are funded by conglomerates that see reduced prices as the most effective way
         of gaining market share.
     (c) Indian Airlines operates a pricing policy that is hard to match for any private organization.
     (d) The private airlines cannot afford to lower their prices, as unlike Indian Airlines, they do not have a
         large enough customer base to make this profitable.
       Passage (Q.125-Q.129):An oracle was not required to tell me that I would suffer from cancer. Given my
       family history (two uncles with prostate cancer, brother Barnes with lymphoma cancer, nieceKirstenDunst
       – who never smoked – with lung cancer), I’ve long felt that it wasn’t so much a matter of “if,” but of
       “when.” Still, last year, when I noticed that a mole on my elbow suddenly seemed darker than usual, my
       “matter-of-fact” attitude faded, and I went into denial mode. “Whatever it is, it’s not serious,” I told myself.
       “It’s always looked that way.” And when I could no longer ignore the voice in my head – the one that
       knew better – I delayed for a few more weeks with the tried-and-true excuse of “I just don’t have time for
       this right now.” As someone who is a health blogger, I know just how quickly a person’s health status can
       change when they adamantly deny to get tested. Yet there I was, intentionally ignoring a symptom that I
       would have told anyone else to get checked out, instantly. When I finally did see my family physician for
       something unrelated, I mentioned it on as a “By the way,” to the end of the appointment. Sure enough, it
       was melanoma. Ignoring symptoms of a disease with a high mortality rate is a surprisingly common
       phenomenon, says Dr. WilliamLensch, Chief of Staffandprofessor at the Harvard Medical School, Boston.
       “People will cognitively avoid things they don’t want to be real; it’s a natural defence mechanism,” he
       says. Studies have shown the different ways it manifests – from using humour, to complete denial to
       acknowledge that an illness might exist. “Many people delay seeing their doctors, and won’t even tell
       their spouses,” Dr. Lensch says. And when they finally make an appointment, they tend to minimize their
       symptoms. “Patients will lead the discussion in a certain way, so that the doctor will be more likely to
       reassure them,” he says, which means that doctors often don’t get a true history and may make important
       decisions based on inaccurate information. Denying that something is amiss, Lensch says, leads to
       delayed diagnosis and treatment, and poorer outcomes. So why do otherwise rational people take an “if I
       don’t see it, it isn’t there” approach to symptoms that can have a perilous effect on their health?
125. If the statements in the given passage are true, then which of the following would also be true?
     (a) Doctors must find a way to help patients being calm and evade any warning signs of health risks.
     (b) Doctors must find a way to help patients acknowledge a serious illness.
     (c) Doctors must find a way to help patients manage their health insurance so they have a hassle free
          health care experience.
     (d) All of the above
126. Which of the following situations is similar in nature to the one in passage?
     I. People will say ‘I’ll deal with it once X or Y is done, then I’ll be in a better place to take some time to
         look after it.
     II. A study published in the British Journal of General Practice in 2015 found that almost half of
         tuberculosis patients realize and act upon early warning signs such as a persistent cough or an
         unexplained lump.
     (a) Only I              (b) Only II             (c) Both I and II      (d) Neither I nor II
127. Which of the following is the most logical corollary of the concluding paragraph of the passage?
     (a) Dr. Morepen says many people are afraid to even book an appointment because they’re worried
         about what a doctor might find.
     (b) Males and females have different reasons for going to the doctor. Males go to prove their strength is
         untouchable and women go to calm their nerves.
     (c) Past studies have shown that people who live in dismal economic conditions are more likely to be
         diagnosed late.
     (d) When you see a patient like that, you think, ‘How could you possibly have thought this didn’t need to
         be dealt with?’
128. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the author’s arguments in the given passage?
     (a) In 2015, a study in The Lancet found that only two in six people who have heart attack warning
         symptoms call for help.
     (b) Dr. Reddy recalls a patient with heart failure who gained 50 pounds before she finally ventured into
         the hospital with huge, fluid-laden legs.
     (c) We’ve discovered that people are reluctant to even mention the word ‘cancer’ in their responses to
         us, almost as though if you mention it, you’re doomed.
     (d) In 2016, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that visiting a doctor for routine
         checks is surprisingly common among geriatric population.
129. In accordance with the passage, which of the following would be the best approach for people to take?
     (a) If you are inundated with work, use your workload as a reason for not seeking help.
     (b) If you don’t drink, eat in moderation, exercise regularly and are in good shape, there can be nothing
         wrong with you.
     (c) If you have a health concern and you cannot figure out what to do, you better seek professional
         advice.
     (d) It is easy for people who have high earnings to visit physicians, but you will manage through self-
         examination.
       Passage (Q.130-Q.134):Thinking deeply about a writer’s potentially shameful lack of capability to capture
       a reader's interest, Francis Bacon has written several times about the experience of starting to write
       books. He compared beginning text with the unpleasantness of going to a function without knowing
       anyone and guessed that readers often felt revengefully eager in such situations to identify with the
       character who tells you what is happening in a book or film. He also related the period before readers
       became familiar with an author’s key ideas and idioms to the time before they were toilet trained. Given
       how painful this can be, Bacon wondered if one of the reasons we put ourselves through such
       discomforts was because we hoped to gain some cognitive privilege as a result.
       Take a pause. Take another. Now, take some time before answering the following questions. Having
       begun this piece of text, how are you feeling? Were you expecting me to inform you immediately why
       Bacon was important; how his ideas related to various cultural historical contexts? if so, don't worry, we'll
       get to that soon. As you've probably noticed, though, by addressing you directly, this introduction is taking
       a more long-winded route in comparison with other things you must have read, and I am going to
       continue in that style for a few pages by offering you not one, but two introductions to Bacon for reasons I
       will subsequently explain. The first is autobiography ‘Why me?’ preface; the second answers the question
       ‘Why Bacon?’ more conventionally.
130. Identify the ‘intelligence’ of the author in writing this piece of text
     (a) to introduce, he has written about Bacon’s views on how authors fail to make the reader relate to
         them. He attempts to solve this problem by addressing the readers directly in the introduction itself
     (b) to introduce, the author has used many unconventional methods which include addressing the reader
         directly in the beginning itself
       (c) the author has, in the beginning itself, accepted the failure on the part of authors to make the readers
           relate to the books in the beginning. He has done this so that people don't have high expectations
           from him.
       (d) the author has given two introductions to Bacon and has not followed the conventional ‘one-
           introduction’ archetype.
132. By taking up the example of a ‘Function’ to explain how the readers feel during the beginning of a text,
     which of the following assumption has been made by Bacon.
     (a) people often get invited to functions where they do not know anyone.
     (b) people, in general, do not enjoy functions
     (c) all people feel the need to relate to someone when they go to a function where they do not know
         anyone.
     (d) most people generally feel the need to relate to someone when they go to a function where they do
         not know anyone.
134. This passage could be an excerpt taken from which of the following?
     (a) introduction of a book on Bacon
     (b) an excerpt from how to write a book
     (c) a literary article on Bacon
     (d) a paper presented on literary criticism
Direction (Q.135): Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
       Six persons M, N, O, P, Q and R are having different heights. N is taller to P. M is taller to R but shorter
       to P. At least one person is shorter to R. The number of person taller to Q is same as shorter to O. Q is
       taller to M.
136. What should come in place of question mark (?) in the following number/alphabetic series?
     X24C3, V22E5, T20G7, ______?
     (a) R16I7           (b) R17I9             (c) R18I9               (d) R19I8
       Directions (Q.137-Q.141):Given below is the bar graph which shows the percentage of persons who like
       three different types of fruits in five different cities. Study the data and answer the following questions.
       Note: One person like only one type of fruit.
                                    100%
                                    90%
                                    80%
            percentage of persons
                                    70%
                                    60%
                                    50%                                                           Mango
                                    40%                                                           Banana
                                    30%                                                           Apple
                                    20%
                                    10%
                                     0%
                                           A          B                    C    D     E
                                                                         City
137. If difference between number of persons who like apple to persons who like banana in city A is 51 while
     average number of person who like mango and apple in city B is 765, then find the ratio of total number
     of person in city A to total number of person in city B.
     (a) 3:5                 (b) 2:5               (c) 1: 3          (d) 3 : 7
138. Find the total number of person in city D. If total number of persons in city D is 200% more than that of in
     city C, while difference between number of person who like banana in city D to number of person who like
     apple in city C is 588.
     (a) 1680                (b) 7840               (c) 3920             (d) 5040
139. Find the total number of person in city E who like Apple if difference between number of person who like
     Apple and Mango together and number of person who like Mango and banana together in city E is Rs
     240.
     (a) 950               (b) 280               (c) 230                 (d) 640
140. If Difference between number of person who like apple in city D to person who like Mango in city E is
     2100 while sum of number of person who like Mango in city D and number of person who like banana in
     city E is 4100, then find total number of person in city D is what percent more than that in city E?
     (a) 75%                 (b) 300%              (c) 150%                (d) 175%
141. Find total number of person in city B, if ratio of number of person in city A to City B is 2 : 3 and total
     number of person in city A & city B together who like apple is 816.
     (a) 510               (b) 1020               (c) 1530               (d) 2040
Directions (Q.142- Q.146): These questions are based on the following diagram.
       Directions (Q.147-Q.150): Read the following information carefully and answer the questions.
       From a class a total of 200 students appeared in an examination consisting three papers P1, P2 and P3.
       56% of students passed in paper P1, 63% passed in P2 and 56.5% passed in P3. 11% students passed
       only in paper P1 and P2, 8% passed only in paper P1 and P3, and 22% students passed in all three
       papers.
       No student failed in all three papers.
147. How many students passed in only paper P2 and P3 but failed in P1?
     (a) 22             (b) 24                (c) 25                  (d) 28
148. What is the ratio of the number of students who passed only in paper P2 to the number of students who
     passed in P3 only?
     (a) 3:2                (b) 4:3              (c) 5:4             (d) 6:5
149. The number of students who passed in paper P1 only is what percentage of the number of students who
     passed in only paper P1 and P3 but failed in paper P2?
     (a) 187.5%           (b) 157.5%              (c) 112.5%        (d) 97.5%
150. The number of students who passed in at most one paper is what percentage of the total number of
     students in the class?
     (a) 43.5%              (b) 44.5%        (c) 45.5%          (d) 46.5%