Rehabilitative Guidelines After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review
Rehabilitative Guidelines After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review
1 Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for   Address for correspondence Michael A. Mont, MD, Center for Joint
  Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, Maryland                           Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic      Orthopaedics, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215
  Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania                                 (e-mail: mmont@lifebridgehealth.org; rhondamont@aol.com).
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center,
  New York, New York
  Abstract                          Rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to pose a challenge for
                                    both patients and providers. In addition, guidelines vary considerably between institu-
                                    tions, which often leave therapy regimens to the discretion of the provider. The lack of
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an excellent option for               functional recovery following surgery. For example, it has
patients suffering from end-stage arthritis,1,2 and its success        been observed that quadriceps muscle strength may decrease
largely depends on surgical technique and implant longevity,           by up to 50 to 60% after the procedure and often fails to return
both of which have improved over the past several decades.3,4          to preoperative levels.8–13 Although orthopedists and thera-
For example, advances in perioperative interventions such as           pists employ various techniques to address poor outcomes
the use of computer-assisted navigation and patient-specific            following surgery, there is currently no consensus regarding
instrumentation, have demonstrated favorable outcomes and              which rehabilitation protocols should be used for improved
are currently undergoing further investigation.5–7 Despite             functional outcomes.14,15
these advancements, outcomes following TKA remain depen-                   Rehabilitation after TKA focuses on recovery of knee
dent on the adequacy of rehabilitation and subsequent                  range-of-motion (ROM), restoration of knee- and hip-muscle
      strength, development of functional independence, and the               The following rehabilitative modalities were chosen as a
      ability to participate in recreational activities.16–18 These are    result of the relevance criteria set before the search and
      commonly used tangible and patient-reported measures to              because they have been frequently utilized in other reviews:
      assess postoperative function, and therefore, are often the          Exercise therapy, aquatic therapy, balance training, continu-
      focus of rehabilitation.16–18 Without rehabilitation, function-      ous passive motion, cold therapy and compression, neuro-
      al independence and activity levels may not be recovered.            muscular electrical stimulation, transcutaneous electrical
      Numerous modalities are directed toward regaining strength           nerve stimulation, and instrument-assisted soft-tissue thera-
      and function, including but not limited to physical therapy,         py (see ►Appendix 1 for a summary of the studies).
      aquatic therapy, ice/compression, transcutaneous electrical
      nerve stimulation (TENS), neuromuscular electrical stimula-          Exercise Therapy
      tion (NMES), and instrument-assisted soft-tissue therapy.            Exercise therapy plays a fundamental role in the postopera-
      Different rehabilitation programs, select modalities for their       tive rehabilitation of patients after TKA. Different protocols
      patients based on practitioner preference, often with little to      provide various instructions for the progression of therapy
      no explanation of the reason for selection.14,19                     after surgery, however, health care professionals often use
          With the availability of a large number of postoperative         their clinical judgment to make adjustments to optimize
      rehabilitative modalities, determining the most suitable regimen     results. Common elements in post-TKA exercise therapy
      is often difficult. More importantly, there are no consistent or      include, but are not limited to: passive knee ROM exercises,
      widely implemented guidelines for rehabilitation after TKA,18,20     lower extremity stretches (for the quadriceps, hamstrings,
      however, several other reviews21,22 have attempted to address        and calf), ice/heat application, gait training, and functional
      this topic. While they offer valuable insight into rehabilitation    training.23 When exercise protocols are designed, many
      following TKA, they did not include several available rehabilita-    aspects may vary from therapist to therapist, including
assess the outcomes of a high intensity (HI) rehabilitation         extension protocol demonstrated similar rates of improve-
program compared with a lower intensity rehabilitation              ment with decreased treatment time, suggesting its utility in
program. They concluded that a HI program leads to better           this common obstacle encountered during rehabilitation.
short-term (p < 0.05) and long-term (p < 0.05) functional           Invasive modalities, such as botulinum toxin injections and
performance when compared with the control group. The HI            soft-tissue releases, are available for the management of knee
group also demonstrated better short-term (p < 0.05) and            flexion contractures but are beyond the scope of this review.
long-term (p ¼ 0.08) quadriceps strength.                              In summary, the primary purpose of exercise therapy is to
    Moffet et al26 compared a new intensive functional reha-        maximize early ROM, improve strength and pain, and to
bilitation (IFR) program with a control group who received          normalize gait mechanics. While there is much debate as to
usual care (which was not defined). Four to six months after         the use of an appropriate regimen, there is a consensus that
TKA, the IFR group demonstrated significantly greater im-            postoperative exercise should consider patient-specific goals
provements in the 6MW distance (p ¼ 0.029), total Western           in addition to having a long-term focus on strength and
Ontario and McMaster universities arthritis index (WOMAC)           function.22
(p ¼ 0.007), and WOMAC pain score (p ¼ 0.001). There were
no significant differences between groups at the 1-year mark.        Aquatic Therapy
Despite the success and encouraging results of the IFR group,       Aquatic therapy after TKA has recently gained popularity, as it
they were unable to attain the same level of functional ability     is believed that the buoyancy of water attenuates the effects of
as healthy age-matched individuals. By 12 months, only 30 of        gravity, decreasing shear, and compressive forces in joints.40
69 patients (43.5%) who completed the study had a 6MW               In addition, the water resistance improves strength, particu-
performance within normal ranges (mean, 448 m; 95% confi-            larly as its intrinsic property to resist movements increases
dence interval, 423–473 m), of which 20 received IFR training.      with speed.21,41 This may be more advantageous in the early
      decreases forces within the knee joint, which may allow              recovery of TKA patients.52 It is postulated to have healing
      patients to experience some relief of pain.                          effects on articular cartilage and ligaments, as well as shorten
                                                                           hospital stay, improve ROM, and lead to fewer circulatory
      Balance Training                                                     complications.52–54 With the use of CPM, the patient should
      Patients often have impaired balance after TKA as a result of        aim to achieve at least 0 to 90 degrees ROM upon hospital
      ligamentous damage that alters mechanoreceptors. This af-            discharge and 0 to 120 degrees upon completion of postop-
      fects joint proprioception and postural control, which in turn       erative rehab.55 Several studies have demonstrated improve-
      influences knee stability.45–47 These deficits affect the ability      ments with CPM use. A retrospective study conducted by
      of patients to perform activities such as twisting, pivoting,        Romness and Rand54 retrospectively compared patients who
      walking on uneven surfaces, and changing direction. To aid           received CPM post-TKA with a control group who only
      with this, balance training may be employed, which includes          received a bulky compression dressing. They found that the
      lower extremity ROM exercises and functional task-oriented           CPM group had significantly greater knee flexion at discharge
      exercises with resistance bands, sidestepping, tandem walk,          compared with the control group (90 vs. 88 degrees;
      and use of a tilt board or balance beam.48,49                        p < 0.02). Additionally, the treatment group was able to reach
         In a double-blinded, RCT conducted by Piva et al,45 it was        90 degrees of flexion in 7.7 days while the control group
      determined that patients who received 6 weeks of balance             required 10.3 days (p < 0.001). While the CPM group had a
      training in addition to their functional training demonstrated       greater mean post-operative wound drainage compared with
      faster gait speed and better results on a single leg balance test    the control group (630 vs. 499 mL, p < 0.02), there was no
      than those who only received functional training. In a pro-          significant difference in the length of hospital stay after TKA.
      spective RCT, Liao et al,50 randomly assigned 113 patients to        McInnes et al56 also conducted a RCT comparing CPM plus
      either an experimental group (n ¼ 58) that received standard         standard rehabilitation to standard rehabilitation alone.
physiotherapy and CPM application while the ST group              ic compared with the control group (509 vs. 680 mg mor-
received physiotherapy and performed sling exercises.             phine equivalents) during the same period (p < 0.05).
Patients in the ST group demonstrated significantly higher         Treatment group patients also reported greater satisfaction,
passive flexion ROM by 6 degrees compared with the CPM             with regards to pain control and stiffness relief, than the
group 1 day before discharge (p ¼ 0.022), however, no differ-     control group (p < 0.0001).
ence was documented at the 3-month follow-up visit. Given             In contrast, Bech et al64 found no additional benefit of
the ease at which sling therapy can be performed and its cost-    consistent cooling via a motorized icing device in comparison
effectiveness compared with CPM, further research is              to intermittent cooling using an ice bag within the first
warranted to assess its value and degree of clinical outcomes     48 hours after TKA. Significant differences were not observed
as a modality of post-TKA rehabilitation.                         between the control and intervention groups with regards to
   In summary, CPM has been a long-standing approach              pain, nausea or vomiting, passive ROM, or opioid use despite
utilized in the recovery of TKA patients. While some may          significant differences in patient-reported satisfaction and
argue for the benefits of CPM in the acute in-patient phase, its   compliance. The intervention group demonstrated greater
degree of long-term advantage still remains controversial.59      satisfaction (8.4 vs. 6.0, p ¼ 0.002) and greater compliance
More recent literature has suggested that CPM use may be          both at day and night (86 vs. 30% and 88 vs. 31%, respectively;
associated with increased postoperative blood drainage, in-       p < 0.001 for both), which the authors suggest may be due to
creased analgesic use, and persistent swelling. As a result of    the convenience and ease of using an automated device.
this new evidence, orthopedists should assess if CPM use will         In summary, most studies suggest that cryopneumatic
have a positive impact on patient recovery.                       therapy is effective for postoperative pain relief and function,
                                                                  particularly as it decreases the metabolic activity of local
Cold Therapy and Compression                                      tissues while providing external support and limiting the
      that of the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the NMES             required less pharmacological pain control (p ¼ 0.05).
      group demonstrated significantly better 12-month outcomes             Despite these promising results, the authors did not compare
      for hamstring strength, SCT, TUG, and 6MW (p < 0.05 for all).        pharmaceutical use between the placebo TENS and actual
      Avramidis et al80 conducted a similar prospective RCT evalu-         TENS groups. Similarly, Rakel et al82 conducted a randomized
      ating 70 patients who received either NMES and physiother-           placebo control trial that separated patients into cohorts
      apy or physiotherapy alone. Compared with the control                receiving TENS (n ¼ 122), placebo TENS (n ¼ 123), or the
      group, the NMES group demonstrated a significantly greater            standard of care (n ¼ 72). It was observed that the supple-
      improvement in walking speed for the 3-minute walk test at           mentation of TENS with pharmacological pain control re-
      6 weeks (p ¼ 0.003) and 3 months (p ¼ 0.001), however, this          sulted in a significant reduction of pain during movement
      difference was not maintained at 12 months. The NMES group           (p ¼ 0.019) and during gait speed testing (p ¼ 0.006) com-
      also had significantly greater short form-36 (SF-36) physical         pared with the standard of care group.
      component scores and knee society function scores at                    Conversely, there are studies suggesting that TENS has no
      6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after TKA (p ¼ 0.001 for all).         effect on pain relief. In a double blinded, placebo controlled
          Conversely, there is evidence suggesting that NMES offers        trial, Breit et al89 randomized patients to receive patient-
      no significant benefit in post-TKA patients. In the previously         controlled analgesia (PCA, n ¼ 22), PCA and TENS (n ¼ 25), or
      mentioned study by Petterson et al,25 no significant differ-          PCA and placebo TENS (n ¼ 22). There were no significant
      ences were found in any of the assessed outcomes (strength,          differences in the use of sedation, spinal anesthesia, or
      SF-36 physical and mental, or performance based tests;               morphine, or VAS scores between the three groups
      p > 0.08 for all after adjusted for baseline values) between         (p > 0.05). Furthermore, Angulo et al90 evaluated patients
      the progressive strength training group (n ¼ 45) and the             who received sensory threshold TENS (n ¼ 18), subthreshold
      joint NMES-progressive strength training group (n ¼ 47). In          TENS (n ¼ 18), or no TENS at all (control, n ¼ 12). All three
(3) detecting and minimizing inappropriate fibrosis that may       normal weight patients after TKA, weight loss measures
be causing irritation or mobility restrictions.92                 should still be encouraged both pre- and postoperatively.
   In summary, while this modality has shown promising               Obesity is often linked with other comorbidities, contrib-
results in the treatment of various chronic orthopedic            uting to an increased risk for complications after TKA. These
pathologies,93,98–100 such as tendinopathy and joint pain,        complications include, but are not limited to, coronary artery
evidence has yet to be published regarding its use in the         disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, and
treatment of knee joint stiffness. Further research in this       hyperlipidemia.107 Optimizing patient outcomes require
area is warranted to determine its efficacy as an acceptable       treatment that may need to begin before TKA. Weight loss
rehabilitation modality for post-TKA patients. At the             greater than 10% of one’s body weight can reduce their risk of
author’s institution, this treatment is used on patients          knee osteoarthritis to that of the nonobese population,
who cannot attain knee flexion past 90 degrees or knee             thereby minimizing the need for joint arthroplasty.108 These
extension past 15 degrees. Our early results indicate that        interventions, whether dietetic, pharmacological, or other-
this is a very useful modality for patients with reduced ROM      wise, should persist postoperatively to reduce obese patients’
at 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively.                                  weight in the long-term to maximize functional recovery and
                                                                  implant longevity.
                                                                     In summary, current studies demonstrate varying, and
Special Circumstances: Obese and Active Patients
                                                                  often times, conflicting outcomes in obese TKA patients.
Obese Patients                                                    Further work is necessary to evaluate whether specific
Obesity is a well-known risk factor for knee osteoarthritis and   modalities can yield better postoperative outcomes in this
may increase a patient’s susceptibility for end-stage osteoar-    growing patient subpopulation.
thritis requiring TKA.101 In fact, as the prevalence of obesity
      concluded there was no difference in outcome as a result of          consideration. Our review aimed to address both of
      high-impact activities.                                              these issues.
          Contrarily, studies have demonstrated unfavorable results            Based on the evidence examined, the optimal rehabilita-
      with high levels of activity. Lavernia et al116 conducted a          tion protocol should include several crucial components.
      study examining autopsy-retrieved specimens after TKA, and           Patients should engage in strengthening and functional
      observed a positive correlation between activity level, poly-        exercises that progress as clinical milestones are met over
      ethylene component wear rate, and length of prosthesis               the first 8 weeks after TKA. Careful early mobilization of the
      implantation. Another study by Mintz et al117 evaluated tibial       patella in all directions is critical for optimal ROM. Rehabili-
      polyethylene in 33 patients after TKA, where component               tation is encouraged to begin as soon as the first POD.
      failure was more notably observed in younger patients.               Strengthening programs can begin as closed-chain quadri-
      They suggested this association was likely due to patient            ceps exercises with supplemental weight added, and eventu-
      activity level.                                                      ally progress to include eccentric and isokinetic exercises that
          The amount of experience a patient has in a recreational         are performed in concentric and eccentric modes throughout
      activity is also important to consider during rehabilitation,        the entire knee ROM. Goals should include an emphasis on
      particularly for physically demanding activities with a risk for     improvement of functional independence and mobility, nor-
      injury, such as skiing, hiking, or horseback riding.110 It has       malization of gait mechanics, pain reduction, and attainment
      been proposed that individuals who are not regularly active,         of early ROM.21,22,33 We agree with the research by Ebert
      and therefore inadequately prepared for sporting activity, are       et al119 that suggests active knee flexion of 80 degrees at the
      at higher risk for athletic injury.118 Additionally, the knee        initial outpatient visit (1–2 weeks post-TKA) is strongly
      joint in a beginner may experience greater loads as compared         correlated with active knee flexion of 110 degrees at 7 to
      with someone who is at a more advanced level.111 In beginner         8 weeks after TKA. The achievement of 110 degrees of knee
outcomes. Preliminary studies92,99,100 have demonstrated                          with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(7):
promising results on the use of instrument-assisted soft-                         1499–1502
tissue therapy for several chronic orthopedic diseases, how-                 10   Doerfler D, Gurney B, Mermier C, Rauh M, Black L, Andrews R.
                                                                                  High-velocity quadriceps exercises compared to slow-velocity
ever, further prospective evaluations are needed to assess its
                                                                                  quadriceps exercises following total knee arthroplasty: a ran-
utility as a rehabilitation technique for knee stiffness follow-                  domized clinical study. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2015; doi: 10.1519/
ing TKA.                                                                          JPT.0000000000000071
    All physicians should encourage healthy forms of weight                  11   Thomas AC, Judd DL, Davidson BS, Eckhoff DG, Stevens-Lapsley JE.
loss in obese patients (BMI > 30) to reduce risk of osteoar-                      Quadriceps/hamstrings co-activation increases early after total
                                                                                  knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014;21(6):1115–1119
thritis and its progression. Regardless of preoperative or
                                                                             12   Yoshida Y, Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Association between
postoperative status, providers have a responsibility to coun-
                                                                                  long-term quadriceps weakness and early walking muscle co-
sel patients to pursue a sustainable, healthy, and active                         contraction after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2013;20(6):
lifestyle.106                                                                     426–431
    In regards to activity, emphasis should be placed on                     13   Stevens-Lapsley JE, Balter JE, Kohrt WM, Eckhoff DG. Quadriceps
fundamental rehabilitative modalities before resumption of                        and hamstrings muscle dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty.
                                                                                  Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(9):2460–2468
higher demand activity. Enthusiastic patients may be eager to
                                                                             14   Ardali G. A daily adjustable progressive resistance exercise pro-
return to activity, but should be educated on the risks and                       tocol and functional training to increase quadriceps muscle
precautions before proceeding. Low-impact activities such as                      strength and functional performance in an elderly homebound
walking, swimming, and stationary bicycling can be encour-                        patient following a total knee arthroplasty. Physiother Theory
aged, but patients should consult with their surgeons before                      Pract 2014;30(4):287–297
engaging in higher impact activities.                                        15   Meier W, Mizner RL, Marcus RL, Dibble LE, Peters C, Lastayo PC.
                                                                                  Total knee arthroplasty: muscle impairments, functional limita-
            and after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Back Mus-      47 Solomonow        M, Krogsgaard M. Sensorimotor control of
            culoskeletal Rehabil 2008;21:161–169                                        knee stability. A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001;11(2):
       28   Devers BN, Conditt MA, Jamieson ML, Driscoll MD, Noble PC,                  64–80
            Parsley BS. Does greater knee flexion increase patient function         48   Fitzgerald GK, Childs JD, Ridge TM, Irrgang JJ. Agility and pertur-
            and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty              bation training for a physically active individual with knee
            2011;26(2):178–186                                                          osteoarthritis. Phys Ther 2002;82(4):372–382
       29   Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R. Knee joint kinematics in        49   Gstoettner M, Raschner C, Dirnberger E, Leimser H, Krismer M.
            gait and other functional activities measured using flexible                 Preoperative proprioceptive training in patients with total knee
            electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for                    arthroplasty. Knee 2011;18(4):265–270
            normal daily life? Gait Posture 2000;12(2):143–155                     50   Liao CD, Liou TH, Huang YY, Huang YC. Effects of balance training
       30   Tew M, Forster IW, Wallace WA. Effect of total knee arthroplasty            on functional outcome after total knee replacement in patients
            on maximal flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(247):168–174                 with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin
       31   Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.        Rehabil 2013;27(8):697–709
            Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone        51   Fung V, Ho A, Shaffer J, Chung E, Gomez M. Use of Nintendo Wii
            Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A(7):1479–1484                                        Fit™ in the rehabilitation of outpatients following total knee
       32   Maloney WJ. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and               replacement: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physio-
            management. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(4, Suppl 1):71–73                        therapy 2012;98(3):183–188
       33   McGrath MS, Mont MA, Siddiqui JA, Baker E, Bhave A. Evaluation         52   Ritter MA, Gandolf VS, Holston KS. Continuous passive motion
            of a custom device for the treatment of flexion contractures after           versus physical therapy in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop
            total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(6):                 Relat Res 1989;(244):239–243
            1485–1492                                                              53   Ritter MA, Stringer EA. Predictive range of motion after total knee
       34   Tanzer M, Miller J. The natural history of flexion contracture in            replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;(143):115–119
            total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res    54   Romness DW, Rand JA. The role of continuous passive motion
            1989;(248):129–134                                                          following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;
66 Delitto A, Snyder-Mackler L. Two theories of muscle strength                   transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). J Pharmacol
     augmentation using percutaneous electrical stimulation. Phys                 Exp Ther 2001;298(1):257–263
     Ther 1990;70(3):158–164                                                 86   Ma YT, Sluka KA. Reduction in inflammation-induced sensitiza-
67   Sisk TD, Stralka SW, Deering MB, Griffin JW. Effect of electrical             tion of dorsal horn neurons by transcutaneous electrical nerve
     stimulation on quadriceps strength after reconstructive surgery              stimulation in anesthetized rats. Exp Brain Res 2001;137(1):
     of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1987;15(3):               94–102
     215–220                                                                 87   Sluka KA, Deacon M, Stibal A, Strissel S, Terpstra A. Spinal
68   Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Stralka SW, Bailey SL. Use of electri-          blockade of opioid receptors prevents the analgesia produced
     cal stimulation to enhance recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle             by TENS in arthritic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;289(2):
     force production in patients following anterior cruciate ligament            840–846
     reconstruction. Phys Ther 1994;74(10):901–907                           88   Stabile ML, Mallory TH. The management of postoperative pain in
69   Stevens JE, Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Neuromuscular electri-              total joint replacement: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimu-
     cal stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening after bilat-             lation is evaluated in total hip and knee patients. Orthop Rev
     eral total knee arthroplasty: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys            1978;7:121–123
     Ther 2004;34(1):21–29                                                   89   Breit R, Van der Wall H. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimula-
70   Binder-Macleod SA, Halden EE, Jungles KA. Effects of stimulation             tion for postoperative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty.
     intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units.               J Arthroplasty 2004;19(1):45–48
     Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27(4):556–565                                 90   Angulo DL, Colwell CW. Use of Postoperative TENS and Continu-
71   Cabric M, Appell HJ, Resic A. Fine structural changes in electro-            ous Passive Motion Following Total Knee Replacement. J Orthop
     stimulated human skeletal muscle. Evidence for predominant                   Sports Phys Ther 1990;11(12):599–604
     effects on fast muscle fibres. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol          91   Hing WBR, Bremner T. Mulligan’s mobilization with movement:
     1988;57(1):1–5                                                               A systematic Review. J Manual Manip Ther 2009;17:25
72   Hainaut K, Duchateau J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation            92   Sevier TL, Stegink-Jansen CW. Astym treatment vs. eccentric
     and voluntary exercise. Sports Med 1992;14(2):100–113                        exercise for lateral elbow tendinopathy: a randomized controlled
      106 Hamoui N, Kantor S, Vince K, Crookes PF. Long-term outcome of          114 Jones DL, Cauley JA, Kriska AM, et al. Physical activity and risk of
            total knee replacement: does obesity matter? Obes Surg 2006;               revision total knee arthroplasty in individuals with knee osteo-
            16(1):35–38                                                                arthritis: a matched case-control study. J Rheumatol 2004;31(7):
      107   Odum SM, Springer BD, Dennos AC, Fehring TK. National obesity              1384–1390
            trends in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(8,         115   Mont MA, Mathur SK, Krackow KA, Loewy JW, Hungerford DS.
            Suppl)148–151                                                              Cementless total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. A compari-
      108   Gillespie GN, Porteous AJ. Obesity and knee arthroplasty. Knee             son with a matched control group. J Arthroplasty 1996;11(2):
            2007;14(2):81–86                                                           153–156
      109   Healy WL, Iorio R, Lemos MJ. Athletic activity after total knee      116   Lavernia CJ, Sierra RJ, Hungerford DS, Krackow K. Activity level
            arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;(380):65–71                       and wear in total knee arthroplasty: a study of autopsy retrieved
      110   Kuster MS. Exercise recommendations after total joint replace-             specimens. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(4):446–453
            ment: a review of the current literature and proposal of             117   Mintz L, Tsao AK, McCrae CR, Stulberg SD, Wright T. The arthro-
            scientifically based guidelines. Sports Med 2002;32(7):                     scopic evaluation and characteristics of severe polyethylene wear
            433–445                                                                    in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;(273):
      111   Seyler TM, Mont MA, Ragland PS, Kachwala MM, Delanois RE.                  215–222
            Sports activity after total hip and knee arthroplasty : specific      118   Swiss Federal Office of Sports. Economic benefits of the health-
            recommendations concerning tennis. Sports Med 2006;36(7):                  enhancing effects of physical activity: first estimates for
            571–583                                                                    Switzerland: scientific position statement. Schweizerische Zeits-
      112   Maloney WJ, Galante JO, Anderson M, et al. Fixation, polyethylene          chrift fur Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie; 2001
            wear, and pelvic osteolysis in primary total hip replacement. Clin   119   Ebert JR, Munsie C, Joss B. Guidelines for the early restoration of
            Orthop Relat Res 1999;(369):157–164                                        active knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty: implications for
      113   Harris WH. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. Clin           rehabilitation and early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
            Orthop Relat Res 2001;(393):66–70                                          2014;95(6):1135–1140
                                                  Author, year            Study group      Therapy type                  Start of program          End of program    Primary measures           Secondary                Final
                                                                                                                                                                                                measures                 follow-up
                               Physical therapy   Petterson et al, 2009   Intervention     Progressive strengthening     3–4 wks postoperative     6 wks             Quad strength and acti-    SF-36, KOS ADLS,         12 mo
                                                                                                                                                                     vation, TUG, SCT, 6MW      knee AROM, knee
                                                                          Control          Standard rehabilitation       N/A                       N/A
                                                                                                                                                                                                pain
                                                  Bade and Stevens-       Intervention     HI                            Upon hospital discharge   25 wks            Pain, ROM, functional      N/A                      12 mo
                                                  Lapsley, 2011                                                                                                      performance, quadri-
                                                                          Control          LI                                                      8 wks
                                                                                                                                                                     ceps strength and
                                                                                                                                                                     activation
                                                  Moffet et al, 2004      Intervention     Intensive functional exer-    2 mo postoperatively      6–8 wks           6MW                        Total WOMAC, WO-         12 mo
                                                                                           cises þ home exercises                                                                               MAC Pain
                                                                          Control          Usual care                    N/A                       N/A
                                                  Evgeniadis et al,       Intervention A   Core and upper extremity      3 wks preoperatively      12–14 d           Iowa level of assistance   N/A                      14 wks
                                                  2008                                     exercises þ standard inpa-                              postoperatively   scale, AROM
                                                                                           tient rehab
                                                                          Intervention B   Lower extremity home su-      At discharge              8 wks
                                                                                           pervised þ standard inpa-                               postoperatively
                                                                                           tient rehab
                                                                          Control          Standard inpatient rehab      N/A                       12–14 d
                                                                                                                                                   postoperatively
                                                  McGrath et al, 2009     Primary TKA      Custom knee device þ stan-    4–8 wks postoperatively   Mean 8 wks        Extension ROM, KSS         N/A                      Mean
                                                                                           dard PT regimen                                                           pain/function scores                                18 mo
                                                                          Revision TKA
                               Aquatic therapy    Valtonen et al, 2010    Intervention     Progressive aquatic           Mean 10 mo                12 wks            Walking speed, SCT,        N/A                      N/A
                                                                                           resistance                    postoperatively                             knee flexor/extensor
                                                                                                                                                                     power, mean thigh
                                                                          Control          No intervention
                                                                                                                                                                     muscle CSA, WOMAC
                                                  Valtonen et al, 2011    Intervention     Progressive aquatic           Mean 10 mo                12 wks            Walking speed, SCT,        N/A                      12 mo
                                                                                           resistance                    postoperatively                             knee flexor/extensor
                                                                                                                                                                     power, mean thigh
                                                                          Control          No intervention
                                                                                                                                                                     muscle CSA, WOMAC
                                                  Harmer et al, 2009      Intervention     Water-based exercise          2 wks postoperatively     6 wks             WOMAC, knee ROM,           N/A                      26 wks
                                                                                           program                                                                   6MW, stair climbing
                                                                                                                                                                     power
                                                                          Control          Land-based exercise program
                               Balance training   Piva et al, 2010        Intervention     Functional training þ bal-    2–4 mo postoperatively    6 wks             WOMAC, LEFS                Gait speed, single leg   6 mo
                                                                                           ance training                                                                                        balance
                                                                          Control          Functional training
                                                  Liao et al, 2013        Intervention     Functional training þ bal-    N/A                       8 wks             Timed 10 min walk,         N/A                      8 wks
                                                                                           ance training                                                             TUG, WOMAC
Vol. 29
                                                                                           þ 15 min of video games       postoperatively                             extension, walking
                                                                                                                                                                     speed, timed standing
                                                                          Control          Standard physiotherapy        Mean 46 d                 Mean 53 d
                                                                                                                                                                     tasks, LEFS, patient
                                                                                           þ 15 min lower leg            postoperatively
                                                                                                                                                                     satisfaction
                                                                                           strengthening
No. 3/2016
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Mistry et al.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  (Continued)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                213
Appendix 1 (Continued)
                                                   Author, year             Study group      Therapy type                  Start of program       End of program         Primary measures          Secondary                  Final
                                                                                                                                                                                                   measures                   follow-up
                               CPM                 Romness and Rand,        Intervention     PT þ CPM                      Immediate              Mean 7.7 d             Knee flexion at dis-       N/A                        1y
                                                   1988                                                                    postoperative                                 charge, postoperative
                                                                            Control          PT þ bulky compression                               Mean 10.3 d
                                                                                                                                                                         wound drainage, LoS
                                                                                             dressing
                                                   McInnes et al, 1992      Intervention     CPM þ standard rehab          Immediate              7 d for CPM            Pain, active/passive      Complications, LoS         6 wks
Vol. 29
                                                   Pope et al, 1997         Intervention A   CPM 0–40 degrees              Immediate              CPM removed after      Mean flexion, functional   N/A                        12 mo
                                                                                                                           postoperative          48 h                   score, ROM, fixed flexion
                                                                            Intervention B   CPM 0–70 degrees
                                                                                                                                                                         deformity, analgesic
                                                                            Control          Physiotherapy only            POD 1                  N/A                    usage
No. 3/2016
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Rehabilitative Guidelines after TKA
                                                   Maniar et al, 2012       Intervention A   1-d CPM                       Immediate              POD 2                  Pain, ROM, TUG, swell-    N/A                        3 mo
                                                                                                                           postoperative                                 ing, WOMAC, SF-12,
                                                                            Intervention B   3-d CPM                                              POD 4
                                                                                                                                                                         wound healing
                                                                            Control          No CPM                                               POD 5
                                                   Joshi et al, 2015        Intervention     CPM þ physiotherapy           Immediate postopera-   Until hospital         AROM, complications,      N/A                        3 mo
                                                                                                                           tive for CPM; POD 1    discharge              discharge disposition,
                                                                            Control          Physiotherapy
                                                                                                                                                                         WOMAC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Mistry et al.
                                                   Mau-Moeller et al,       Intervention     Physiotherapy þ sling         POD 2                  1 d before discharge   Passive knee flexion       Active knee flexion         3 mo
                                                   2014                                      exercises                                                                   ROM                       ROM, active/passive
                                                                                                                                                                                                   knee extension ROM,
                                                                            Control          Physiotherapy þ CPM
                                                                                                                                                                                                   static postural con-
                                                                                                                                                                                                   trol, physical activity,
                                                                                                                                                                                                   pain, LoS, SF-36, HSS,
                                                                                                                                                                                                   WOMAC
                               Cold and compres-   Levy and Marmar,         Intervention     Cold compressive dressings    Immediate              Postoperative day 14   Blood loss, change in     N/A                        N/A
                               sive therapy        1993                                                                    postoperative                                 hemoglobin, analgesic
                                                                            Control          Standard dressings
                                                                                                                                                                         usage, total arc ROM
                                                   Su et al, 2012           Intervention     Cryopneumatic device          Immediate              N/A                    ROM, 6MW, TUG, knee       N/A                        6 wks
                                                                                                                           postoperative                                 girth, narcotic use,
                                                                            Control          Ice with static compression
                                                                                                                                                                         satisfaction
                                                   Bech et al, 2015         Intervention     Consistent cooling via mo-    Immediate              First 48 h             Pain (NPRS)               Nausea, vomiting,          First 48 h
                                                                                             torized device                postoperative          postoperatively                                  passive ROM, opioid        postoperatively
                                                                                                                                                                                                   use, patient satisfac-
                                                                            Control          Intermittent cooling
                                                                                                                                                                                                   tion, patient
                                                                                                                                                                                                   compliance
                               NMES                Stevens-Lapsley et al,   Intervention     Standard rehab þ NMES         Rehab on POD 1; NMES   6 wks                  Quadriceps strength,      SF-36, WOMAC               12 mo
                                                   2012                                                                    on POD 2                                      hamstring strength,
                                                                                                                                                                         6MW, SCT, TUG, exten-
                                                                            Control          Standard rehab                POD 1                  8 wks
                                                                                                                                                                         sion active ROM
                                                   Avramidis et al, 2011    Intervention     Physiotherapy þ NMES          POD 2                  6 wks                  3-min walk test, SF-36,   N/A                        12 mo
                                                                                                                                                                         KSS
                                                                            Control          Physiotherapy                 POD 1                  N/A
                                                   Levine et al, 2013       Intervention     Home ROM exercise þ NMES      14 d preoperative      60 d postoperative     KSS pain/function, WO-    N/A                        6 mo
                                                                                                                                                                         MAC, TUG
                                                                            Control          Therapist-managed ROM ex-     N/A                    N/A
                                                                                             ercise þ strengthening
                                                                                             exercises
                                                       Author, year            Study group      Therapy type                   Start of program           End of program         Primary measures             Secondary                 Final
                                                                                                                                                                                                              measures                  follow-up
                               TENS                    Stabile and Mallory,    Intervention A   Placebo TENS þ IM              Immediate                  POD 3                  Analgesic usage              N/A                       POD 3
                                                       1978                                     hydromorphone                  postoperative
                                                                               Intervention B   Actual TENS þ IM
                                                                                                hydromorphone
                                                                               Control          IM hydromorphone
                                                       Rakel et al, 2014       Intervention A   TENS                           Immediate                  6 wks                  Pain during ROM and          Pain intensity at rest,   6 wks
                                                                                                                               postoperative                                     walking                      hyperalgesia,
                                                                               Intervention B   Placebo TENS                                              6 wks
                                                                                                                                                                                                              function
                                                                               Control          Standard of care (pharmaco-                               N/A
                                                                                                logical analgesia only)
                                                       Breit et al, 2004       Intervention A   PCA þ TENS                     Immediate                  First 24 h             Use of sedation, spinal      N/A                       First 24 h
                                                                                                                               postoperative              postoperatively        anesthesia, morphine;                                  postoperatively
                                                                               Intervention B   PCA þ placebo TENS
                                                                                                                                                                                 VAS
                                                                               Control          PCA
                                                       Angulo et al, 1990      Intervention A   Sensory threshold              Immediate                  POD 3                  VAS, pain relief, hospital   N/A                       Either POD 3 or
                                                                                                TENS þ CPM                     postoperative                                     stay, knee flexion arc,                                 discharge from
                                                                                                                                                                                 narcotic usage                                         hospital
                                                                               Intervention B   Subthreshold TENS þ CPM
                                                                               Control          CPM only
                              Abbreviations: 6MW, 6-min walk; ADLS, activities of daily living; AROM, active range of motion; CPM, continuous passive motion; CSA, cross-sectional area; HI, high intensity; IM, intramuscular; KOS, Knee Outcome
                              Survey ; KSS, knee society score; LEFS, Lower Extremity Functional Scale; LI, low intensity; LoS, length of stay; N/A, not applicable; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; POD, postoperative day; PT, physical
                              training; rehab, rehabilitation; ROM, range of motion; SCT, stair-climb test; SF-12, short form-12; SF-36, short form-36; TENS, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; TUG, timed-up-
                              and-go test; VAS, visual analog scale; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index.
Vol. 29
No. 3/2016
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Mistry et al.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          215
Appendix 2 Physical therapy guidelines for total knee arthroplasty. (Reprinted with permission from authors and AlterG, Inc., Fremont, CA.)
Appendix 2 (Continued )