Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
Simply because a person is injured, he or she cannot assert strict liability and
automatically recover. Instead, the injured consumer in asserting strict liability,
still must prove his or her right to compensation by showing that the unreasonable
dangerous condition of the product was what actually caused the injuries sustained
