Scribd
Upload
5K views1 page

Reconsiderationletter

Raul Casanova requests reconsideration of the denial of a zoning clearance for a fencing project. The decision was made without considering the adverse effects it would have on registered land owners. Specifically, the 60 meter wide road planned in the zoning ordinance was passed without evaluating how it could be realistically implemented in the area given the current situation. The owner asks that the decision be re-examined in light of these important factors that were overlooked previously.

Uploaded by

Rosemarie Aldas Casurra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5K views1 page

Reconsiderationletter

Raul Casanova requests reconsideration of the denial of a zoning clearance for a fencing project. The decision was made without considering the adverse effects it would have on registered land owners. Specifically, the 60 meter wide road planned in the zoning ordinance was passed without evaluating how it could be realistically implemented in the area given the current situation. The owner asks that the decision be re-examined in light of these important factors that were overlooked previously.

Uploaded by

Rosemarie Aldas Casurra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

April 28, 2018

RAUL D. CASANOVA
Zoning Officer III
Zoning Administrator-Designate
City Planning and Development Office
Surigao City

Re: Denial of Zoning Clearance Application


Lot No. 1, Block 27, Teachers Village
Brgy. Cagniog, Surigao City
Dated April 27, 2018

Dear Mr. Casanova:

I ask for the reconsideration of your decision to deny the


issuance of a zoning clearance for fencing project in the subject lot,
myself representing the registered owner.

Your decision pursuant to the City Comprehensive Land Use


Plan of the City (Zoning Ordinance No. 389, Series of 2016) I suppose
was passed without careful consideration by your Office as to the effect it
will cause to registered land owners. As Zoning Officer, it should have
been your duty to consider the adverse effect once the 60.0 meter wide
road be implemented to the situation obtaining in the area.

While this may not be the proper forum to question the


seemingly ineptitude on your part to consider its implementation in the
area, fact, said ordinance was passed without even lifting your finger to

You might also like