REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
Department of Labor and Employment
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION
REGIONAL ARBITRATION BRANCH NO. 02
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan
x--------------------------------------------x
POSITION PAPER
Complainant (“Complainant”), by himself, and unto this
Honorable Office most respectfully submits his position paper and
states the following:
I.
PARTIES
1.1. Complainant is a Filipino, of legal age, and a resident of and may
be served with summons throught the undersigned counsel;
1.2. Respondent is a corporation duly registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, with its principal office ;
1.3. Respondent Jr. is a Filipino, of legal age, and may be served with
summons in the principal office of the agency above-mentioned.
II.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
2.1. On May 27, 2017, complainant was deployed by respondent
agency in Khamis Mishait K.S.A. to work as a heavy equipment
operator for Mohamed Al Dosry Contracting Establishment
(hereinafter referred to as the “Principal”). A copy of the
employment contract of complainant is attached hereto as Annex
“A”;
2.2. On May 28, 2017, complainant started working as a heavy
equipment operator with a salary of 1875 Saudi Arabia Riyal as
stated in the Overseas Employment Certificate attached hereto as
Annex “B”;
2.3. It was only on July 18, 2017 that complainant received his first
salary from the employer in the amount of 1,200 Saudi Arabia Riyal
despite working for almost 2 months already;
1
2.4. Due to the delay and underpayment of his salary, complainant
sought help from respondent agency but there was no response;
2.5. Complainant then had no choice but to continue working even
without receiving any salary for the months of August and
September;
2.6. On October 15, 2017, complainant received his second salary in
the amount of 1200 Saudi Arabia Riyal only. This prompted
complainant to apply for repatriation before the Philippine Overseas
Employment Agency in Tuguegarao City, Cagayan;
2.7. While waiting for the response of POEA – Tuguegarao City,
complainant continued working for the EMPLOYER;
2.8. Sometime in November 2017, complainant received his salaries
for the months of August, September and October but only in the
amount of 3600 Saudi Arabia Riyal;
2.9. On January 17, 2018, his EQAMA was confiscated by the
PRINCIPAL then forcefully expelled him and his workmate Michael
George Manaois from their accommodation;
2.10. Michael and complainant were offered accommodation by our
friend, Jomar Bugawan, for four days until they were rescued by the
personnel of Philippine Embassy. Thereafter, Michael and
complaianant stayed in the shelter being offered by the Philippine
Embassy from January 17, 2018 until May 8, 2018;
2.11. On May 10, 2018, complainant arrived in the Philippines.
III.
ISSUES
1. Whether or not Complainant was illegally dismissed.
2. Whether or not the respondent committed breach of
contract of employment.
3. Whether or not Complainant is entitled to the
unexpired portion of his contract.
IV.
DISCUSSION
RE: Whether or not complainant was illegally dismissed.
2
4.1. Complainant was illegally dismissed when the PRINCIPAL
confiscated his EQAMA (work document) and expelled him from his
accommodation. The PRINCIPAL has no valid ground to terminate
complainant. Hence, the dismissal was illegal. Moreover, in the case of
PERT/CPM MANPOWER EXPONENT CO., INC. vs. ARMANDO A. VINUY, ET.
AL. (G.R. No. 197528, 5 September 2012), constructive dismissal or
discharge is defined as “a quitting because continued employment is
rendered impossible, unreasonable or unlikely, as, an offer involving a
demotion in rank and a diminution in pay.”
4.2. The non-payment of his salary from June to September 2017, in
addition to his living condition at that time, “complainant was compelled
by the dismal state of his employment to resign or give up his job;
effectively, he was constructively dismissed”. (PERT/CPM MANPOWER
EXPONENT CO., INC. vs. ARMANDO A. VINUY, ET. AL.)