Original Article
SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF LOCAL ANAESTHESIA IN
                        HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
                                               1
                                                HUMAYUN K SIDDIQUI
                                                     2
                                                       ALI HUSSAIN
                                             3
                                               FATIMA NASEEM A KHAN
                                             4
                                               AQIB MUHAMMAD SHAFI
                                                  5
                                                    UMAIMA HEYAT
ABSTRACT
     	 The aim of this study was to review the literature to assess any scientific basis for the limited use
     of dental anesthesia with a vasoconstrictor agent in hypertensive patients. This stratified random-
     ized control study was carried out at the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Baqai
     Dental College, Karachi from August 2014 to January 2015. The total numbers of patients were 75;
     age range from 25 to 70 years. The patients were characterized by the JNC-8 report for hypertension
     patients i.e. normotensive with <120/180mmHg and hypertensive with >140/90mmHg. Patients
     were clinically evaluated and were divided into three groups, each groups comprises of 25 patients.
     Group A: Hypertensive patients who were administered 2% lignocaine. Group B: Hypertensive patients
     administered 2% lignocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and Group C: Normotensive patients who
     were administered 2% lignocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. The mean age of the study sample was
     46.62±13.81. These three groups were further stratified into three categories on the basis of age i.e.
     young patients’ age 25 to 35 years, middle age 36-55 years and old age 56-70 years respectively, to
     check the relation of hypertension with age. The mean B.P increased in all groups after two minutes
     of administration, which maintained even after 5 minutes of administration, while after extraction
     it returned to the observed baseline values in each group. When including age as a co-variable in the
     multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences was observed between groups and did
     not show any adverse effects of epinephrine.
     Key Words: Hypertensive, normotensive, oral surgery, epinephrine, pulse rate.
INTRODUCTION                                                    	Vasoconstrictor agents have benefits like delaying
                                                                the absorption of local anesthesia toxicity; they increase
	 The utilization of local anesthesia with vasocon-
                                                                the depth and duration of local anesthesia and provide
strictor is a common clinical practice in dentistry. The
                                                                homeostasis.1 Despite all these, they have limited dose
effects of vasoconstrictor in hypertension vary from
                                                                of systemic absorption and initiate the side effects in
patient to patient. According to the literature, it has a
                                                                hypertensive patients, until used in safe dosage.2 The
potential to cause serious effects in patients who suffer
                                                                frequent increase in the number of patients in OPD
from persistent hypertension and is contraindicated in
                                                                with hypertension and the use of local anesthesia
such patients. As far as routine dental clinical practice
                                                                with vasoconstrictor agents in patients raise concerns
is concerned, the treatment protocol for hypertensive
                                                                about the elevation of B.P. If a practitioner considers
patients is not much followed in controlled hypertension.
                                                                pharmacologic effects of infiltrated substances have,
1
  	Dr Humayun K Siddiqui, Head of Department of Oral &          it is obvious that the specialist must know and control
    Maxillofacial Surgery in Baqai Dental College, Karachi
2
  	 Dr Ali Hussain, Lecturer in Baqai Dental College, Karachi   the situation thoroughly. This situation may worsen
3
  	Dr Fatima Naseem A Khan, Lecturer in Baqai Dental College,   if proper protocols are not followed. Epinephrine re-
    Karachi Corresponding Author: Fatima Naseem A Khan,
    Lecturer in Baqai Dental College, Karachi                   inforces the effect of local anesthetics by increasing
	 Email: fnaknlm@gmail.com Cell: +92-300-2308827                the duration and depth of analgesia3 and is regularly
4
  	Dr Aqib Muhammad Shafi, House Surgeon in Baqai Dental
    College, Karachi                                            incorporated for infiltration in most commercial prepa-
5
  	Dr Umaima Heyat, Postgraduate student in Dow Medical Uni-    rations because it aids in homeostasis.4,5 Epitome of
    versity, Karachi
	 Received for Publication:	          October 26, 2017
                                                                vasoconstrictor decreases the systematic toxicity of
	 Revised:	                           December 21, 2017         L.A and after infiltration decreases the release of local
	 Approved:	                          December 22, 2017
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 37, No. 4 (October-December 2017)                                                  538
                                                             Systemic effects of local anaesthesia in hypertensive patients
anesthetics to blood circulation.6 B.P and heart rate,7        having systolic pressure greater than 150mmHg and
arrhythmia,8 myocardial ischemia,9,10 increase of endog-       diastolic with increased 95mmHg were not treated to
enous catecholamine,10 and hypokalemia11 were raised           prevent any future medical emergencies.17,18 Firstly,
after administration of L.A containing epinephrine             informed consent was taken from the patients. All
noted in previous studies. The morbidity and mortality         the subjects were pre-informed about the risks and
rate rose with the increase of epinephrine dose.12 This        benefits involved with procedure. Stratified random
is important for patients with cardiovascular disease.         sampling was done and categorized into three groups,
Recent studies show that epinephrine associated with           each category comprising 25 subjects:
L.A has a safety range.13                                      	 Group A: Hypertensive patients administered
	    According to American Heart Association (AHA) and         lignocaine,
American Dental Association (ADA) guidelines, there            	 Group B: Hypertensive patients administered
is no contraindication to using a vasoconstrictor agent        lignocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000,
when administrated carefully and with preliminary
                                                               	 Group C: Normotensive patients administered
aspiration. The maximum dose of epinephrine in local
                                                               lignocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000.
anaesthesia for a healthy subject is 0.2 mg, though this
can be lowered to 0.04 mg if patient has severe cardio-        	 Data was collect under the supervision of an oral
vascular disease (ASA III and IV).14 Therefore, the aim        and maxillofacial surgeon. All patients went through
of this study was to review the literature to assess any       the same procedure of evaluation; the record sheet and
scientific basis for the limited use of dental anaesthesia     consent were signed before the procedure. The two
with a vasoconstrictor agent in hypertensive patients.         cartridges of L.A injection containing 2% lignocaine
                                                               with 1:100,000 epinephrine were used in group B and
METHODOLOGY                                                    group C, while group A was evaluated by plain cartridge
	   The total numbers of patients were 75; age ranged          of 2% lignocaine. B.P and P.R were recorded as risk
from 25 to 70; the patients were clinically evaluated          indicators, which were measured four times for the
from August 2014 to January 2015 at the Oral Surgery           patient: First at rest position on a dental chair, second
and Maxillofacial Department of Baqai Dental College,          immediately after injection, third after 5 minutes of
Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan. The               injection, and fourth 15 minutes after extraction. The
department averagely treats 45 patients per day, com-          B.P was measured by a sphygmomanometer, and the
plaining of a variety of dental problems. The patients         P.R was measured by principle method of the manual
were characterized by the JNC-8 report for hypertension        palpation of the radial artery. The above three groups
patients i.e. normotensive with <120/80mmHg and                were further stratified on basis of age to check the
hypertensive with >140/90 mmHg.15 According to the             relation of hypertension with age, which was group
report patients were divided into controlled group (i.e.,      into three categories young patients with age of 25 to
patients with normal range of B.P: systolic 120 mmHg           35 years, followed middle age of 36-55 years, and old
and diastolic 80 mmHg), hypertensive patients admin-           age 56-70 years respectively. The chart 1 defined the
istered lignocaine with epinephrine, and hypertensive          division of patients in relation to age.
patients administered only lignocaine. Both male and           RESULTS
female patients of hypertension and normotensive seek-
ing dental department for extraction. Patients who were        	 For details see Tables 1-4. The mean age of this
taking beta blockers were excluded in the study as these       study sample was group A: 42.96 ± 14.45, group B: 45.20
are shown to interact with epinephrine.16 Patients with        ± 14.80, and group C: 51.72 ± 10.84. When including
any other cardiovascular disease or any serious illness        age as a co-variable in the multivariate analysis, no
were also excluded from study and patients who had             statistically significant difference was observed between
not taken their daily prescribed medicine and patients         groups. The mean B.P raised in all three groups after
      TABLE 1: GROUP A: HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS ADMINISTERED ONLY 2% LIGNOCAINE
 Group A                       At rest            2 minutes after           5 minutes after         After extraction
                                                     injection                 injection
 Systolic BP                135.40 ±6.44            142.20 ±3.55               141.80 ±6.10            138.20 ±6.59
 Diastolic BP                84.80 ±4.89             89.80 ±6.84               88.60 ±6.04              87.40 ±7.23
 Pulse rate                  84.64 ±8.09             92.08 ±9.11               89.84 ±8.19              88.12 ±7.33
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 37, No. 4 (October-December 2017)                                                  539
                                                             Systemic effects of local anaesthesia in hypertensive patients
      TABLE 2: GROUP B: HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS ADMINISTERED 2% LIGNOCAINE WITH
                                EPINEPHRINE 1:00,000W
 Group B                         At rest           2 minutes after          5 minutes after         After extraction
                                                      injection                injection
 Systolic BP                141.60 ±10.67            144.80 ±8.35              142.20 ±9.58            136.80 ±6.27
 Diastolic BP                  83.60 ±4.89           89.00 ±7.21               87.00 ±4.56              80.40 ±8.15
 Pulse rate                    86.72 ±10.93          95.88 ±13.48              94.44 ±11.87             87.40 ±5.68
       TABLE 3: GROUP C: CONTROL GROUP OR NORMOTENSIVE PATIENTS ADMINISTERED
                         2% LIGNOCAINE WITH EPINEPHRINE 1:100,000
 Group C                         At rest           2 minutes after          5 minutes after         After extraction
                                                      injection                injection
 Systolic BP                   112.40 ±8.30          119.00 ±3.53              117.00 ±4.78            115.40 ±4.06
 Diastolic BP                  79.00 ±3.22           86.40 ±5.86               83.40 ± 4.01             81.80 ±4.30
 Pulse rate                    81.20 ±6.62           83.88 ±6.51               82.56 ±5.50              81.36 ±3.62
                       TABLE 4: DIVISION OF AGE ACCORDING TO STUDY GROUP
 Type of study Young patients            Middle age      Old patients          Total               Mean B.P
 group          (25-35 years)             patients       (56-70 years)
                                        (36-55 years)
 Group A                   9                  16                  0             25         131.47± 14.09/83.70±8.49
 Group B                   0                  4                   21            25        143.83± 8.57/86.8.10±4.06
 Group C                   0                  7                   18            25        136.22± 28.18/84.7.44±1.90
2 minutes of administration, which maintained even             constriction of the blood vessels in the mucosa and
after 5 minutes of administration, while after extraction      skin, which favors latent period and reduces the dis-
it comes back to baseline degree, which was observed           semination of the local anesthetic due to the action of
in each group. The mean pulse rate was also increased          alpha-adrenergic receptors, but the beta 1-adrenergic
by 3 to 4 beats after 2 minutes of administration and          receptors of adrenaline, will raise the heart rate and
then decreased after 5 minutes in all groups. As both          the beta 2-adrenergic receptors will cause vasodilation
clinical and statistical results were significant, no risk     of internal organs and muscles. There are few reports
changes were observed.                                         that relate the use of major hypertensive and nonse-
DISCUSSION                                                     lective beta-adrenergic blocking agents may interact
                                                               with administered epinephrine infusions.19 Yoshito
	   The main aim of this study was to assess the changes       Nakumara et al found that a patient with hypertension
in the B.P and P.R of diagnosed hypertensive patients          undergoing tooth extractions has a risk of increased
before, during, and after dental extraction under local        B.P than normotensive patients after injecting the
anesthesia containing epinephrine in comparison with           2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. It has also
the control group; the mean B.P raised in all groups           been observed that mean systolic B.P showed changes
after 2 minutes of administration, which maintained            throughout the procedure on other hand mean diastolic
even after 5 minutes of administration, while after            B.P remains constant in comparison with preoperative
extraction it returned to the baseline value, which was        readings.20
observed in each group. All the procedure was carried
                                                               	 In Nigerian study, no hemodynamic changes has
out with the permission of the Ethical Committee of the
                                                               been observed in hypertensive patients on administra-
university. Therefore, we concluded that statistically
                                                               tion of L.A with epinephrine and without epinephrine.21
no notable changes were seen clinically in this study
                                                               hypertensive patients are considered more prone to risk
while decrease in blood pressure in group B was not
                                                               when administering dental local anesthesia containing a
associated with any adverse effects of epinephrine. The
                                                               vasoconstrictor because of the possible sudden increase
local anesthetic containing adrenaline is most widely
                                                               in B.P could lead to life-threatening situation.22 The
used in dental practice. Epinephrine stimulates the
                                                               limited outcome parameters and small sample size are
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 37, No. 4 (October-December 2017)                                                  540
                                                               Systemic effects of local anaesthesia in hypertensive patients
the limitation of this clinical study; however to the best       the blood pressure and pulse rate of patients of both
of our knowledge, this is one of the very few clinical           groups, which shows that no harmful effect on blood
trials conducted on the local population in Pakistan             pressure and pulse rate occurred with the use of two
to observe the effects of local anesthesia on controlled         cartridges of local anesthesia with epinephrine. There
hypertensive patients. In this study, there were no              were no significant changes between normotensive and
significant changes in the systolic blood pressure and           hypertensive patients using two cartridges of local an-
the diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients            esthesia conjugation with epinephrine. Whether there
from rest till 5 minutes after administering lignocaine.         was slight decrease in blood pressure in group B after
As compared to the study research undertaken in the              extraction is not associated with any adverse effects
Lahore local population, there was a significant fall            of epinephrine.
observed in the systolic blood pressure and diastolic            REFERENCES
blood pressure before injecting lignocaine till 5 minutes
                                                                 1	   Hui-Jin S, Seong-Ho O, Jin-Young S, et al. Vasoconstriction
after the administration of lignocaine.23 The results                 Potency Induced by Aminoamide Local Anesthetics Correlates
were statically significant. From 2002 to till the all                with Lipid Solubility. J biomed biotechnol 2012; 2012: 1-7.
relevant studies reported an increased systolic blood            2	   Bader JD, Bonito AJ, Shugars DA. A systematic review of
pressure of average 4 mmHg in hypertensive patients                   cardiovascular effects of epinephrine on hypertensive dental
which received dental surgery under L.A with 1:100,000                patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
                                                                      2002;93(6):647-53.
epinephrine.
                                                                 3	   Nathiya B, Dilip K, Raghuveer H, Prashanth T, Shobha E, Vi-
	   There was no significant difference in the controlled             nod R, Prithvi R. Evaluation of anxiety induced cardiovascular
group of this study from rest till the extraction of the              response in known hypertensive patients undergoing exodontia
tooth except for the pulse rate, which fell 6 ppm after               - a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(8):123-27.
extraction. The study group in which the hypertensive            4	   Franklin SS, Jacobs MJ, Wong ND, L’Italien GJ, Lapuerta
patients were given lignocaine without epinephrine                    P. Predominance of isolated systolic hypertension among
                                                                      middle-aged and elderly US hypertensives: Analysis based on
also showed no difference in the systolic blood pressure,
                                                                      National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate from rest till               III. Hypertension 2001;37(3):869-74.
after extraction of the tooth. Noticeable fall in systolic
                                                                 5	   Knoll-Kohler E, Fortsch G, Knoll-Köhler E, Förtsch G. Pulpal
blood pressure has also been observed after dental local              anesthesia dependent on epinephrine dose in 2% lidocaine. A
anesthesia in normal individuals.                                     randomized controlled double-blind crossover study. Oral Surg
                                                                      Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73(5):537-40.
	 A West Indian study reported 20% decrement in
systolic blood pressure after injecting lignocaine along         6	   Elad S, Admon D, Kedmi M, Naveh E, Benzki E, Ayalon S,
                                                                      Tuchband A, Lutan H, Kaufman E. The cardiovascular effect
with 0.06 mg epinephrine during periodontal surgery.24                of local anesthesia with articaine plus 1:200,000 adrenalin vs
	   Undesirable effects of epinephrine on cardiovascu-                lidocaine plus 1:100,000 adrenaline in medically compromised
                                                                      cardiac patients: A prospective, randomized, double blinded
lar system are minimal as compared to their benefits.                 study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
Painful dental extraction can result in increased stress              2008;105(6):725-30.
in hypertensive patients, which in turn can lead to              7	   Nakamura Y, Matsumura K, Miura K, Kurokawa H, Abe I,
overproduction of adrenaline by the body. This could                  Takata Y. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to dental
prove far more dangerous for such patients. The existing              surgery with local anesthesia. Hypertens Res 2001;24(3):209-14.
investigation provides evidence that the test dose (2            8	   Nedal A, Abdullah A, Ahmad A, Suliman A, Abdulrahman A.
                                                                      A prospective randomized clinical trial compared the effect of
cartridges) of 2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
                                                                      various types of local anesthetics cartridges on hypertensive
as a dental local anesthetic solution is not likely to                patients during dental extraction. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7(1):
decreases or increase systolic/diastolic blood pressure               84-88.
in hypertensive patients.                                        9	   Little JW, Falace DA, Miller CS, Rhodus NL. Dental manage-
                                                                      ment of the medically compromised patient on vital source. 6th
CONCLUSIONS                                                           ed. St Louis (MO): CV Mosby; 2002; 73-76.
	   We conclude that no significant changes were ob-             10	 Pallasch T. Vasoconstrictors and the heart. J Calif Dent Assoc
served clinically and statistically in our study, as results         1998;26(9):668-73.
did not bring any changes in controlled hypertensive             11	 Kubota Y, Toyoda Y, Kubota H, Asada A. Epinephrine in local
patients who were administered only 2% lignocaine for                anesthetics does indeed produce hypokalemia and ECG changes.
                                                                     Anesth Analg 1993;77(4):867-68.
tooth extraction, with group of controlled hypertensive
patients administered 2% lignocaine with epinephrine.            12	 Niwa H, Hirota Y, Sibutani T, Idohji Y, Hori T, Sugiyama K,
                                                                     Joh S, Kuji A, Matsuura H. The effects of epinephrine and
However, no hemodynamic changes were found in
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 37, No. 4 (October-December 2017)                                                            541
                                                                       Systemic effects of local anaesthesia in hypertensive patients
    norepinephrine administered during local anesthesia on left          19	 Hersh EV, Giannakopoulos H. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents
    ventricular diastolic function. Anesth Prog 1996;38(6): 221-26.          and dental vasoconstrictos. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(4):
                                                                             687-96.
13	 Henslee TM, Hodson SB, Lamy CJ, Palladino SJ. Vasoconstric-
    tive agents commonly used in combination with local anesthetics:     20	 Nakamura Y, Matsumura K, Miura K, Kurokawa H, Abe I,
    A literature review. J Foot Surg 1987;26(6):504-10.                      Takata Y. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to dental
                                                                             surgery with local anesthesia. Hypertens Res 2001;24(3):209-14.
14	 Anna G, Tomasz S, Marcin J, Katarzyna ST. Clinical assessment
    of the safe use local anaesthesia with vasoconstrictor agents        21	 Ogunlewe MO, James O, Ajuluchukwu JN, Ladeinde AL,
    in cardiovascular compromised patients: A systematic review.             Adeyemo WL, Gbotolorun OM. Evaluation of haemodynamic
    Med Sci Monit 2014; 20: 393-98.                                          changes in hypertensive patients during tooth extraction under
                                                                             local anaesthesia. West Indian Med J 2011;60(1): 91-95.
15	 JNC 8 Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension in
    Adults. J Am Med Assoc 2013.                                         22	 Gungormus M, Buyukkurt MC. The evaluation of the changes
                                                                             in blood pressure and pulse rate of hypertensive patients during
16	 Ramasamy C. Protocols for hypertensive patient management                tooth extraction. Acta Med Australacia 2003;30(5): 127-29.
    in the dental office - short communication. International J Med
    Dent 2013; 3(4):267-79.                                              23	 Chaudhry S, Iqbal HA, Izhar F, Mirza KM, Khan NF, Yas-
                                                                             meen R, Khan AA. Effect on blood pressure and pulse rate
17	 Sanda MP, Monica S, veronica M, Mihaelatuculina T, Ionela                after administration of an epinephrine containing dental local
    D. Hypertensive patients and their Management in Dentistry.              anaesthetic in hypertensive patients. J Pak Med Assoc 2011;
    Hindawi Publ Corp 2013; 1-8.                                             61(11):1088-91.
18	 Janet HS, Danielle GG, Pandu RG, Leslie RH, Cesar YC, Charles        24	 Gedik RG, Marakoglu I, Demirer S. Blood pressure, heart rate
    PM. Dental management in patients with hypertension: chal-               and temperature variability during periodontal surgery. West
    lenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2016;8:111-20.           Indian Med J 2005; 54(5):329-33.
                                              CONTRIBUTIONS BY AUTHORS
   1	 Humayun K Siddiqui:	                    Conception, design and analysis and interpretation of data, revising it
                                              critically for intellectual content.
   2	   Ali Hussain:	                         Data collection and write up drafting of data.
   3	   Fatima Naseem A Khan:	                Data collection and final drafting of the manuscript.
   4	   Aqib Muhammad Shafi:	                 Formulation of tables and interpretation of data.
   5	   Umaima Heyat:	                        Compilation of write up drafting of data and provided substantial help
                                              in various aspects.
   6	 Muhammad Imran Khan:	                   Analysis and interpretation of data.
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 37, No. 4 (October-December 2017)                                                                    542
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited
                            without permission.