0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views1 page

Rem 69

This document discusses rules of civil procedure regarding class action lawsuits, joinder of parties, and unknown defendants. It provides examples of class suits brought on behalf of numerous stockholders or employees against a corporation or employer. It also discusses suing alternative defendants, joining alternative causes of action, and effecting service upon unknown defendants through publication. The document notes that a class suit cannot be dismissed or compromised without court approval.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views1 page

Rem 69

This document discusses rules of civil procedure regarding class action lawsuits, joinder of parties, and unknown defendants. It provides examples of class suits brought on behalf of numerous stockholders or employees against a corporation or employer. It also discusses suing alternative defendants, joining alternative causes of action, and effecting service upon unknown defendants through publication. The document notes that a class suit cannot be dismissed or compromised without court approval.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

3 S:lNi:•+er+e SMM ,,,. tt #101,x ..

◄Wflif

Cl.\flL PROCEDUREAW
t ·· ·.. .
*7?fi!SiiiWe&·ii@tt&?IH5WWUM
SAN 8EQA LAW CENTRAUZED BA~ OPERATIONS: MEMO~Y
1e.e1021ee1 a 11 · a,as,· ea 1t;4a•«M1¥:S
2br9
· ,,,
"it. . . .
,.... · Example .of class suit . Answer: · He should sue . the vehicle drivers. and
}t, •Oeri.vative · s1,1it brought on be_ half of -numerous o.wners rn· ttie :a!ternative(1 RiANO, supra at .234).
,t. stockholders of a corporation to perpetually enjoin or
{: · nullify what is 'claimed to be a breach of trust .or an Just as the Rule ailows ~ suit against d~fendants in
i', · ultra vir~s act of the com pany's board direct.ors.' of the · alternative, the Rul.e also allows alternative
/ .. 'causes ·of . action · and -alternatfv~ defenses "(ROG,
Rule .8, Sec. 20). · · ·

I
In ·such a suit, there is one, single right 'at ·action
pertaining •; tc:i numer_ous stockholders, not multiple
rights belonging separately tci several, ·di$tinct · W~ere the ~uit ·_is agairi'st alternative defendants
persons : under alternative causes "of action , one for.,breach of
. con.tractof carriag~ by sea and the other.for.viola tion
II!· .
Example of permissiv.e joindet of parties · · of arrastre contract and al the. time tl=) _e complaint is
[.
t.a Employe _e:s·dismissed :by their employer on the same -filed, ·the ·pl1;1intiffdi_d npt.~now <,1t'whatprecise stag,e
occasio"n · for. . -substantially the . ~ame reasons, of tlW Series, of trans.actions ··the loss ·com plained of
~t'
}' . alleg·edly wiJhout ·cause or justificati o n, ·m.a1 join as· took place,·jo ii:ide"rof causes of. action:an~ partie s

t
~L:,.
. ·:plaintiff in a single action to -obtain relief from t_heir
e'mployer . :- ·. · ·
defendan _ t~ is allowe <;J ·under Sec. 5:,Rule 2 of the ·
.Rules : of Court(lnsur ance Co . . of. North America v.
/Jnited States Line_s-CQ.,GR: No.L-21839; April 30,
:::··. }968).. . . . .
, -In such ..a .case, the 'plaintiff eac h -h,:1ve a material ,
.·interest only fn the damages pr0perly .due to. himi .not /1 '.?i
inJho~e that may be payable .to. the others, althougl f /' ) (. s ·ecTION .14. UNKN()WN IDENTITY OR NAME OF
the:_ir right_sthereto a~ise .fr9m the same trans actibn; !;( '\ DEFEN .DANT · · · ·

it_._is tr~_e that in_ ~o!h_"juridical sit~ations, ' _.~; ;,~r ;/ ','.~:H1. - ~~-~,:1ever ,tbr;identity _ or n·ame o( a def~nd l;lhf is
es~ential factors e~1st '·:·• !he same trans~_9Jjs>n~r:';:~'j'!,;,-';100 ¥£1~~~::-far;r,ay~be .sued _as the .u~kno:-vn ow ner,
sene~ . of. tr.insact1ons 1s inyc;ilved; 8..1J .d:5:i::emm0l:)~-- ! ·. heir, aev1(>e ·~!'\?f:·by such othe_r des1gnat1on as th.e
qu~stions ·of fact or-law are at 1s_s_ ue. ~f.lftmakes th,t\:d . 1 case. may rtq ~l!Je. ·. · . . . . . . . ,
:situatio n ·cl · ·proper . case for a cl~s~;-~i:(it · is t~~,.. [" ·,·: . · . . · -~f ~ \\ . · . · · . .. ·
circur:flstan.c?,tt)at ther~ is · only one ~ig~t ~;..'q"Et~se. of · r\ '. W)len 1hi~id¥-titi or true n~me is discoyer~~; . the
action· pertaihing or belonging )Rf;fufnm6'\ft9'srtiah,¥-;. !-~:: . ph;iadinmrriusi be'•~mended accordingly. ·. · ·
pars_bns, not separately . orl ~~yerallJ ;::tl? ,dis~inc('' r~~l
.··.;-~··J ·• JL:.J}~ .• . . . .
i
individuals (Re: . R_equest ~j/th~ "•IH~i~~) or\ ·,tJ:!.i ,t•..~) Serv1c.,~~H,;:>J'P\'il19:PSupon•. a •·defendant. _whos~
.
Passengers of the -Dona Paz fp ~?t f\$1"qe1th~ Orii~r. · j':~ · identity ·is-¼UJ!lE,"0own may ; by · .leave "Of court, ..-be ·
Da._ted . January . 4, . 19.88 , of -:.71, y,fiy_e '{,~(3.: ,f. p{ effect ed ·~p~n ~.im by publication jn a· newspaper ·of
. Clii11gc::t.ia11gco, A.fvf: . No . . 88-1-(J,f.6-f,; ~,flj_'C/~ · 3, . tt;;;:;~f~~1eral crrculat1on. (ROC, Rule 14, Sec.>14). . .. ·
1988)., .· · . ; •'~~ ·':"'":. . ·, ,_.;..,,,
\ . ..-j.-i~:w1 ,t, J._-:'c- -: .. . · ·, · ·. · • ..
. :,,,,,,,-: · . ,:,(' ·'.,..,,--:-·~ii.c..:- 5ee -i:l'0N•.•·$,15, ENTITY · WITHOUT JURIDICAL
N_ote:· A·, class suit shall · hot . .be ·:~/i ·miss~l!:f .br,. . . ·. .PERS9NA~IT:V AS DEf EN.DANT
,. ci;>mpro"rnfs~d without .the: approv 9! . 6f-:,~m~J)OOurt_· ·· · · · · · · ·
(RO(;, Rul e FT,$ea. 2). . . - . ;. · 'WhE:ih·.iwo•
.~r- mo.re ,perso~s not orga~ ized .as an
ertity with .Juridical p!:irso~alfty .: enter info a·
A membe.r 'at the das~ ·is bound by. tt)~ judgment "lri _transaction, they ..may_qe .sueq ·under _the name ~Y
the cl.ass suit; he nce.this .section ghies him the r'ight . .. which
.
th.
.
ey are. genera.)ly .
or-
.
com.rno.rily
.
k1)6Wh. . ·
to "intervepe if·he de.sires to protect hisown indivi_dual ·
In· the ·an s'wer of such defendant, the ·riames and
. interesf(1
. .
R£GA~ADD
. ./s upra at 102). ·· ·
..: . ...\ ·..addre&_~e.s.of . tl:ie .persorjs com po.~ing s~id entity
SECTION 1_~--Al,,TERNATIVE QEFE~DAN-TS .: m.us! all"be revealed .. · · ·· ·

· .' Where· the . plaintrff is . uncertain ' cigainst who of .$~rvfo:e


..of summons .111ayl;>e-effected upon ali the .
· · several pe_rsqr\s he. is ~ntitl"ld 'to relief; he· may joi_n defendants by . serving· upon any . one of them, O'r
any i;ir air o.fthem ai:rdefendants in t!'Je alternative; • . upon the pe~soii" in charge .of the. office or. place of
although . a· .right to · r~lief against :one · may
be . · .. bl!Siness maintained . Iii such nam~ (ROC; Rule ·14,
_iriconsisterit with' a rightto relief a!:J'.ajnst
·1.
he· oth~ r:- ·. Sec. 8). . .

Ex~m~le: · A~su~ _e that ·. Mr.X.,•a pedest rl;m, •was· An entity w1thout'juridical. p_ersona'lity may be sued .·
inju·red in the collision of. two vehicles .. He suffer~d ·under . a common name tiy ·y,,hicl)-· it ,is cqmmonly ·
injuries but -does not know -with certainty which known wheri .it re·pr.esents to the plaintiff ·vnde r c';1
· vehi'cle cau·sed the niish _ap. What should .Mr. X do if common name, and the latter relies -.ori such
he wants to sue? · · · representation (Lapanday .vs. Estita, . i:iR . 162109,.
Ja,nu{Jry71, 2005). ·

2019 SAN BEPA CENTRALIZED BAR OPERA !IONS J 41

You might also like