Scribd
Upload
39 views2 pages

Nilay

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provides simpler mechanisms for resolving intellectual property disputes compared to litigation. ADR methods for IP disputes include arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and settlement. Several Indian acts support resolving disputes through ADR to avoid costly and lengthy litigation, including the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, the Civil Procedure Code, and the Indian Constitution. While ADR may not always resolve complex IP disputes, it can help narrow issues for litigation. Not using ADR can be detrimental as litigation takes a long time and is more expensive, the outcome is rigid and unpredictable, and it can negatively impact businesses through decreased reputation and market value.

Uploaded by

Chaitanya Sapkal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views2 pages

Nilay

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provides simpler mechanisms for resolving intellectual property disputes compared to litigation. ADR methods for IP disputes include arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and settlement. Several Indian acts support resolving disputes through ADR to avoid costly and lengthy litigation, including the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, the Civil Procedure Code, and the Indian Constitution. While ADR may not always resolve complex IP disputes, it can help narrow issues for litigation. Not using ADR can be detrimental as litigation takes a long time and is more expensive, the outcome is rigid and unpredictable, and it can negatively impact businesses through decreased reputation and market value.

Uploaded by

Chaitanya Sapkal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISM ADR

is a simple mechanism for the resolution of dispute in IP. IP includes copyright, trademarks, trade
dress, patent etc. various methods that are used for peaceful resolution of dispute in IP are
arbitration, mediation, conciliation, settlement which acts as an alternative to court based litigation.
There are several acts in India which also provides for the peaceful settlement of dispute through
ADR –

1. The arbitration and conciliation act, 1996

2. The civil procedure code, 1908: section 89 provides for the amicable settlement of dispute
through ADR mechanisms

3. The constitution of India: ADR in India was founded on the constitutional basis of articles 14 and
21 which deals with equality before law and equal protection of law.

4. The legal services authority act, 1987 Even where the alternative dispute resolution methods fail
to be the effective choice for the determination of disputes related to intellectual property rights,
they can be used for narrowing down the issues for contestability in a traditional model of litigation.

DISADVANTAGES OF NOT PRACTISING ADR MECHANISM

IP can be large and complex and often involves high degree risk. Resolving the disputes relating to
the IP often proves detrimental to both business houses and the parties relating to it. Some of the
major disadvantages are as follows:

Long duration to arrive at a resolution: The procedure followed by the court in resolving dispute is
very lengthy and time consuming. It is a big failure in providing speedy justice to the seekers or the
disputant parties. 

Costlier as compared to a ADR: The court procedure is an expensive one as compared to the ADR. At
the multiple stages the disputant parties need to invest lump sum amount of money.

 Rigidity of result or decision: The decision given by the court of law cannot be changed it has the
binding effect on both the parties , no any terms and conditions can be settled by the parties, once
the decision of the court comes out , the parties has to follow the court rulings as it is .

 No control over outcome: The parties have no control over the rulings of the court, it is
unamendable.

 No predictability of result: Parties cannot predict the result or the outcome of the ruling of the
court. The decision of the court only depends on the wish of the honorable judge/jury.

 Negative impact on the business: Slow trial procedure degrades the parties which lay negative
effect on the concerned business of the parties; it affects the good will of the company.

 Downfall in the market value: When any sort of controversy arose in relation to a company or a
firm dependent on IP , it affects the market value of the company and so its share degrades .

 Negative publicity: Lengthy procedure of the court leads to the downfall of the reputation of an IP
based enterprise and public loses its faith on the company.
 Effect business relationships: It adds to the ill will of the company which affects badly the business
relationship with the other firms.

You might also like