Prosecuting Medicaid Fraud
in Texas
       Senate Finance
  Sub-Committee on Medicaid
      February 15, 2011
                Presented by:
            David S. Morales
   Deputy First Assistant Attorney General   1
                Civil Medicaid Fraud
                   Division (CMF)
Authorized by the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act
   (TMFPA), Human Resources Code, Chapter 36 to:
 Investigate and prosecute “unlawful acts” under the
   statute
 Issue civil investigative demands
 Require sworn answers to written questions
 Obtain sworn testimony through examinations under
   oath prior to litigation
                                                        2
                                          (CMF continued)
Remedies Under the TMFPA
   Treble damages
   Up to $10,000 civil penalty per violation
   Revocation of provider agreement or license
   Automatic exclusion from participation in Medicaid for
    10 years
                                                             3
                                           (CMF continued)
Private causes of action or qui tam actions
 The OAG determines whether to prosecute on behalf of the
    state
 2007 Amendment allows the “relator” to continue the suit
    even if the OAG does not intervene
 In either case, the Texas Medicaid Program recovers
    damages and the relator shares in the recovery.
(Texas retains an additional 10% of Medicaid recoveries due to
    compliance with the 2005 Federal Deficit Reduction Act.)
                                                             4
             CMF Statistics
CMF Docket                         FY 2010
Pending Cases/Investigations       298
Cases Closed                       63
Cases Opened                       94
CMF settled and recovered funds in the following matters. The
recoveries listed on the next slide are the state and federal funds,
after deducting the relator shares and attorney’s fees.
                                                                       5
             CMF Cases FY 2010
Case                                       Recovery to Medicaid
State of Texas v. Mylan                    $5,642,016
State of Texas v.AstraZeneca               $65,058
State of Texas v.UHS                       $3,712,118
State of Texas v. Aventis                  $2,783,130
State of Texas v.Otsuka                    $220,745
State of Texas v. Medtronic                $449,835
State of Texas v.Pfizer                    $52,379,648
State of Texas ex rel Ven-A-Care
    v. B.Braun                             $711,000
State of Texas v.FORBA/Small
    Smiles                                 $11,062
State of Texas v. Bayshore                 $330,745
State of Texas v. IVAX                     $224,255
State of Texas v. Omnicare                 $1,651,371
State of Texas ex rel Ven-A-Care v. Teva   $27,326,454
State of Texas v. Ortho/Dermatop           $438,182
                                                                  6
State of Texas v. Intermune                $563,783
            CMF Cases FY 2011
Case                                              Recovery to Medicaid
State of Texas v. Astra Zeneca                    $21,674,142
State of Texas v. Novartis (TOBI)                 $9,527,698
State of Texas v. Novartis/McKee                  $15,190,457
State of Texas v. Glaxo                           $16,679,740
State of Texas v. Ortho                           $2,847,022
State of Texas ex rel Ven-A-Care v. Mylan         $53,114,656
State of Texas v. Forrest/Gobble                  $7,210,383
State of Texas v. Allergan/Beilfuss               $2,657,873
State of Texas v. KOS/Cashi                       $428,731
State of Texas ex rel Ven-A-Care v. Actavis
    Jury verdict totaling over $170 million obtained on February 1, 2011.
    This is the highest known verdict to be obtained in Travis County.
                                                                            7
            CMF Pending Cases
 Caremark for failure to reimburse Medicaid for pharmacy
  benefits paid on behalf of dual eligible Medicaid recipients
 Janssen Pharmaceuticals and its parent company, Johnson &
  Johnson, regarding the marketing of the drug Risperdal.
 Par pharmaceutical companies and their subsidiaries for
  pricing fraud.
 Caremark for falsely rejecting reimbursement requests from
  Texas Medicaid.
 Wyeth for rebate fraud, as part of a national litigation team.
                                                                   8
     Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU)
  MFCU conducts criminal investigations
  into allegations of fraud, physical abuse,
  and criminal neglect by Medicaid
  providers.
 57,000 Active Texas Healthcare Providers
 3.7 Million Medicaid Recipients
 2,400 Long-Term Care Facilities
                                               9
        Statutory Authority
MFCU is authorized by 42 CFR 1007 and defined
in 1 TAC 371.1601 as the OAG division
responsible for investigating and prosecuting
Medicaid fraud committed by providers.
MFCU must report quarterly to the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services –
Office of the Inspector General (HHSC-OIG).
Violations of state law are prosecuted under the
most appropriate Penal Code statute including
theft, misapplication of fiduciary property,
Medicaid fraud, and tampering with a government
                                                   10
record.
         Staff and Funding
STAFF:
In 2003, MFCU had 39 employees
HB 2292, 78th Texas Legislature expanded the staff
    to 208.
FY 2010 FTE’s = 193 which reflects recent budget
    cuts
FUNDING: FY 2010
             State Budget        Actual
 HHS Grant $10.5 Million      $10.1 Million
 State Match* $4.4 Million    $4.3 Million
 Total       $14.9 Million    $14.4 Million
                                                     11
             Referral Sources
Source                                 Number of Referrals
Dept. of Aging & Disability Services   93
FBI                                    7
Texas HHSC-OIG                         147
Law Enforcement                        9
MFCU Self-Initiated                    32
National Association of MFCUs          6
Other State Agencies                   4
Providers                              7
Public                                 105
U.S. HHS-OIG                           11
Other                                  21
                                                             12
              Investigations
                             FY-2003   FY2009       FY2010
Cases Opened                    165      562           815
Pending Cases                   309    1,342         1,433
Cases Presented                  68      360          377
Convictions*                     39       97          101
Overpayments
   Identified           $14.4 million $56 million $71.0 Million
* Approximately 36% in Federal Court
                                                                  13
              Medicaid Fraud and Abuse
                Referral Statistics
Action                              FY 2010
Cases Opened                        815
Cases Closed                        935
Cases Presented                     377
Criminal Charges Obtained           154
Convictions                         101
Potential Overpayments Identified   $71,009,463.83
Misappropriations Identified        $69,070.75
Cases Pending                       1,433
                                                     14
         Provider Types
 Practitioners
      Doctors, Dentists, Podiatrists, Psychiatrists, LPCs
 Medical Support
     Pharmacies, Durable Medical Equipment Suppliers, Laboratories,
     Medical Transportation Services, Home Health Care
 Institutions
     Hospitals, Nursing Homes
 Others
     Rehab Facilities, Chemical Dependency Treatment Centers,
     Adult Day Care Facilities, Outpatient Care
                                                                  15
            Types of Fraud
 Billing for services not rendered
 Billing for unnecessary services
 Upcoding – Billing for a more expensive
  service than was provided
 Billing for services provided by unqualified staff
 Kickbacks for patients
 Padding Cost Reports
 Billing for products/drugs not needed or not
  delivered
 Billing for diluted or Mexican drugs
 Billing for ambulances used as a taxi
                                                       16
            Fraud Trends
 Home Health Care Fraud Is Increasing
     From 45 cases to 131 since 2006
 DME Fraud Remains a Major Problem
     Wheelchairs, Incontinence Supplies, Orthopedic Equipment
 Ambulance Cases Fraud is Tapering Off
     From 87 cases to 66 since 2006
 Audiologist Fraud Is Increasing
     Fitting patients in Nursing Homes, Adult Day Care Centers
 Physicians and Physician Group Fraud is increasing
     From 163 cases to 219 since 2006
     Shift from Individuals to Physician Groups
                                                           17
           Additional Tools
 Remove limitations on third-party recoveries that have
  greatly reduced the CMF’s ability to sue for all of the
  fraudulent claims filed under the Medicaid program.
 Allow the state to file a lien for restitution that has been
  ordered by a court as a result of a felony conviction
  involving the state Medicaid program.
 The OAG has been working with Senator Nichols and
  Senator Seliger (SB 544) to assist both MFCU and CMF in
  investigating and prosecuting cases.
                                                                 18