Anestheticagents Commonlyusedbyoral Andmaxillofacialsurgeons
Anestheticagents Commonlyusedbyoral Andmaxillofacialsurgeons
C o m m o n l y Us e d by Or a l
a n d M a x i l l o f a c i a l Su r g e o n s
Kyle J. Kramer, DDS, MSa,*, Jason W. Brady, DMDb,c,1
KEYWORDS
Midazolam Diazepam Ketamine Dexmedetomidine Propofol Nitrous oxide
Anesthetic agents Inhalational
KEY POINTS
Thorough knowledge and understanding of an anesthetic agent’s pharmacodynamic and pharma-
cokinetic profile are critical for safe and efficient clinical use.
Short-acting drugs without active metabolites are ideal for providing the full spectrum of anesthesia
in the unique office-based dental environment.
To maximize satisfactory outcomes, selected anesthetic agents must match well with the needs of
the patient, anticipated procedure, and surgeon.
Table 4
Ketamine
Induction/procedural sedation
IV bolus 0.5–1.5 mg/kg
IM bolus 3 mg/kg (2–5 mg/kg)
Acute analgesic adjunct Fig. 1. Dexmedetomidine: mechanism of action. cAMP,
cyclic adenosine monophosphate; GTP, guanosine
IV subanesthetic bolus 0.25 mg/kg
triphosphate.
160 Kramer & Brady
elicits a biphasic response causing short-lived avoid hemodynamic changes, and a variable qual-
hypertension and then hypotension. Dexmedeto- ity of sedation among patients. The sedative pro-
midine is one of the most highly selective a2 ago- file produced by dexmedetomidine is similar to
nists available, with an affinity ratio of 1620:1 for that associated with sleep. Constant surgical stim-
a2:a1, and although it shares physiologic similarities ulation, common in many oral surgical procedures,
with clonidine, its affinity for a2 is 7 times higher than can lead to spontaneous arousal. Cost remains a
clonidine.28 The predictable and stable hemody- primary disincentive; however, the US Food and
namic effects without respiratory depression pro- Drug Administration has recently approved a
vide optimal benefits for anesthesia providers. It generic version of Precedex.
also acts as an antisialagogue, has opioid-sparing
effects, and is neuroprotective, but is not as potent OPIOID AGONISTS: MORPHINE,
of an amnesic agent as benzodiazepines. HYDROMORPHONE, FENTANYL CONGENERS
decrease in respiratory rate and minute ventilation, as norfentanyl. Remifentanil is unique because it
despite the increase in tidal volume. Opioids undergoes metabolism via nonspecific plasma es-
depress the central respiratory drive by inhibiting terases with an extremely rapid terminal half-life
the medulla’s response to hypercarbia and hypox- approximating 3 to 8 minutes and is devoid of
emia. Higher potency opioids are capable of any active metabolites.36
causing skeletal muscle rigidity when given
rapidly, which can impede ventilation without sub- Clinical Use
sequent neuromuscular blockade. As mentioned previously, these opioid agonists are
most frequently used for analgesia during the peri-
Pharmacokinetics operative period (Table 6). All can be titrated to the
desired effect, often using the patient’s respiratory
Morphine is the prototypical opioid agonist and re- rate as a rough guide to determine adequate anal-
mains the gold standard to which other opioids gesia, with a rate of 10 to 12 breaths per minute be-
are compared. However, morphine has several fea- ing an acceptable target. The extended duration of
tures that may render it less than ideal when action of morphine and hydromorphone can be
compared with hydromorphone. Morphine is rela- useful when prolonged postoperative analgesia is
tively hydrophilic, causing a notoriously delayed desired. Clinicians must be certain, however, that
peak effect (w15–20 minutes) even when given the peak effect of any drug administered is verified
intravenously. Hydromorphone is quite similar but before dismissal of the patient. The fentanyl
somewhat easier to titrate because it is more lipo- congeners can be quite useful for shorter surgical
philic, with a faster peak effect (w5–10 minutes). procedures, especially those where adequacy of
Both undergo hepatic metabolism; however, analgesia can be obtained with local anesthesia.
morphine is converted into the active byproduct A main benefit of these drugs is their shorter dura-
morphine-6-glucuronide metabolites, which hydro- tion of action, which can reduce the risk of compli-
morphone lacks.32 Both agents are renally elimi- cations postoperatively, particularly respiratory
nated with similar elimination half-lives depression. Fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil to
approximating 2 to 4 hours. a lesser degree, can all be given via intermittent bo-
The phenylpiperidine opioid subclass, fentanyl, luses, titrated to the desired clinical effect. Remi-
and its congeners, sufentanil, alfentanil, and remi- fentanil, because of its rapid metabolic profile,
fentanil, have pharmacokinetic profiles that may must be administered via continuous infusion to
be more ideal for shorter surgical procedures maintain surgical analgesia. In fact, if remifentanil
commonly performed in the office-based environ- is used, another opioid agonist is recommended
ment. All of these opioids are more potent than to provide postoperative analgesia and to also
morphine and are quite lipophilic with very rapid help combat postoperative hyperalgesia, which
onset approximating 30 to 60 seconds and peak can occur with remifentanil.
effects within 5 minutes. The duration of action,
primarily dictated by the redistribution half-life, ap- INHALATIONAL AGENTS (NITROUS OXIDE,
proximates 30 minutes for fentanyl, 17 minutes for VOLATILE AGENTS)
sufentanil, and 14 minutes for alfentanil.33–35 With
the noted exception of remifentanil, all undergo The use of inhalational anesthetic agents for
hepatic metabolism to inactive metabolites, such dentistry and oral surgery dates back to the late
Table 6
Opioids
Perioperative Analgesia
Agent Route Dosea
Morphine IV bolus 0.05–0.1 mg/kg
Hydromorphone IV bolus 0.1–0.2 mg
Fentanyl IV bolus 1–2 mg/kg
Sufentanil IV bolus 1–2 mg/kg
Alfentanil IV bolus 5–15 mg/kg
Continuous infusion 0.5 mg/kg/min (0.25–1 mg/kg/min)
Remifentanil Continuous infusion 0.05 mg/kg/min (0.025–0.1 mg/kg/min)
a
Titrated slowly to effect.
162 Kramer & Brady
1800s and the time of Horace Wells, William Mor- benign, causing minimal cardiovascular alter-
ton, and Crawford Long37 and the discovery of ations because of the mild dose-dependent
modern anesthesia. The first inhalational anes- myocardial contractility depression being offset
thetic agent was nitrous oxide, followed almost by a modest increase in sympathetic tone. The
immediately by ether. Although nitrous oxide re- net result is a rather stable cardiovascular profile
mains a popular inhalational anesthetic agent, in otherwise healthy patients. An additional differ-
ether has had many successors, the most recent ence is the potential to trigger malignant hyper-
being the fluorinated hydrocarbons isoflurane, thermia, which is present with all volatile agents
sevoflurane, and desflurane.38 There currently ex- but completely absent with nitrous oxide.
ists no single anesthetic agent that can provide
every desired aspect of anesthesia; however, Pharmacokinetics
these inhalational agents are in all likelihood the As inhaled anesthetics, the uptake, equilibration,
closest, capable of producing hypnosis, anal- and distribution of the volatile agents and nitrous
gesia, amnesia, sedation/unconsciousness, and oxide are primarily dictated by the concentration,
skeletal muscle relaxation.39,40 In addition, the de- flow rate, and solubility (blood:gas partition coeffi-
livery of these drugs via the inhalational route pro- cient) of each gas as well as by the cardiac output
vides an extremely rapid onset of clinical activity, of the patient (Table 7). Once a positive gas
facilitating easy titration to the desired effect, and gradient is established at the alveolar level in rela-
a rapid recovery rivaled by few other anesthetic tion to the blood, the gas begins to saturate the
agents. blood plasma. The same phenomenon occurs be-
tween the blood plasma and the bodily tissues,
Pharmacodynamics with the end result given ample time, and stable
drug delivery being the establishment of an equi-
Nitrous oxide and the other volatile agents all act librium between the anesthetic partial pressures
to cause global CNS depression; however, the at the alveolar, blood plasma, and tissue (brain)
actual mechanism of action by which they produce levels. Isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, and
their clinical effects is yet to be completely under- nitrous oxide all undergo some degree of meta-
stood and identified. Nitrous oxide and the current bolism; however, it is to such a miniscule degree
volatile agents are known to interact with a wide that they are essentially considered unchanged
variety of ion channels present within the central when eliminated. These anesthetic agents are
and peripheral nervous systems.38 In addition, exhaled and eliminated via the lungs, in the reverse
nitrous oxide also acts as an opioid receptor of the same processes that dictated their initial up-
agonist as well as an NMDA receptor antagonist, take and distribution.
similar to ketamine. The minimum alveolar con-
centration (MAC) is a useful means to compare Clinical Use
the potency of the various agents, with a single
MAC being the alveolar concentration in which Nitrous oxide is administered concurrently with
50% of patients fail to respond to a surgical stim- oxygen most commonly via the traditional nasal
ulus. MAC also allows for estimations of anesthetic hood, which is an open system. These systems
depth because MAC values are additive. For can easily incorporate the use of other anesthesia
example, a patient administered 3% desflurane monitors, such as capnography or pulse oximetry,
(w0.5 MAC) plus 50% nitrous oxide/50% oxygen
(w0.5 MAC) is receiving roughly 1 MAC total of
Table 7
inhalational anesthetics. Although the volatile Inhalational agents
agents and nitrous oxide are all associated with
dose-dependent depression of the respiratory Partition Coefficients
drive, increases in respiratory rate, and reductions
Agent MAC % Blood:Gas Fat:Blood
in tidal volume and minute ventilation, the nitrous
oxide effects are minimized when it is used alone Nitrous oxide 104 0.47 2.3
for minimal sedation. Nitrous oxide does not Isoflurane 6 1.4 45
cause, nor break a bronchospasm, because it Sevoflurane 2 0.65 48
lacks the significant bronchodilatory effects noted Desflurane 6 0.42 27
with the volatile agents, specifically sevoflurane.
Comments
Volatile gases cause dose-dependent myocardial
depression and peripheral vasodilation, manifest- MAC awake 0.3%–0.4% (inhaled drug is
sole anesthetic maintenance
ing commonly as bradycardia and significant hy-
agent)
potension. In comparison, nitrous oxide is rather
Anesthetic Agents Commonly Used by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 163
to verify the presence of fresh gas exchange and permits the delivery of an anesthetic plan tailored
adequacy of oxygenation, respectively. Patient specifically to each individual patient.
dose-responses generally follow a bell-shaped
curve, with hyperresponders at risk of overdose REFERENCES
and oversedation. Unconsciousness has been re-
ported even with the “normal” nitrous oxide dose 1. Moore PA. Sedative-hypnotics, antianxiety drugs,
concentrations of 30% to 50%. As such, nitrous and centrally acting muscle relaxants. In:
oxide is ideally administered incrementally, with Yagiela JA, Dowd FJ, Neidle EA, editors. Pharma-
careful titration to the desired clinical endpoint, cology and therapeutics for dentistry. 5th edition.
rather than to a set concentration. Nitrous oxide St Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p. 193–218.
can also be used concurrently with the volatile 2. Robinson DH, Toledo AH. Historical development of
agents, thereby providing an additive MAC frac- modern anesthesia. J Invest Surg 2012;25(3):141–9.
tion free of significant cardiovascular effects. 3. Walder B, Tramer MR, Seeck M. Seizure-like phe-
Use of the volatile agents requires additional nomena and propofol: a systematic review.
armamentarium and safety protocols beyond those Neurology 2002;58(9):1327–32.
associated with nitrous oxide alone. A vaporizer is 4. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Intravenous
needed to safely administer these volatile agents, anesthetics. Chapter 9. In: Butterworth JF,
often via an anesthesia machine with a closed cir- Mackey DC, Wasnick JD, editors. Morgan & Mikhail’s
cuit capable of removing carbon dioxide and recy- clinical anesthesiology. 5th edition. New York: The
cling the remaining gases. Although any of the McGraw-Hill Companies; 2013. p. 175–88.
aforementioned volatile agents are capable of 5. Dolin SJ. Drugs and pharmacology. In: Padfield NL,
serving as maintenance anesthetic agents, each editor. Total intravenous anaesthesia. Oxford (United
has its own distinct advantages/disadvantages. Kingdom): Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000. p. 13–35.
Isoflurane is currently quite economical and a viable 6. Casagrande AM. Propofol for office oral and maxillo-
option for particularly long cases. Its pharmacoki- facial anesthesia: the case against low-dose keta-
netic profile is slower than the others, which may mine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64(4):693–5.
lead to a slower, albeit smooth emergence and re- 7. Hiraoka H, Yamamoto K, Miyoshi S, et al. Kidneys
covery. Desflurane is the least soluble of the volatile contribute to the extrahepatic clearance of propofol
agents; therefore, it is not only the least potent but in humans, but not lungs and brain. Br J Clin Phar-
also the least likely to accumulate within the bodily macol 2005;60(2):176–82.
tissues, combined with the fastest emergence and 8. Cillo JE Jr. Analysis of propofol and low-dose
recovery profile. Although it may be the “fastest” ketamine admixtures for adult outpatient dentoal-
of the volatile agents, it is particularly irritating to veolar surgery: a prospective, randomized,
the airways, which hampers its utility for mask in- positive-controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac
ductions. Sevoflurane is considered by many to Surg 2012;70(3):537–46.
be the preferred volatile agent because of its versa- 9. Murray MJ. Propofol. In: Murray MJ, Harrison BA,
tility. Although not as “fast” as desflurane, sevoflur- Mueller JT, et al, editors. Faust’s anesthesiology re-
ane is non-irritating and is quite effective for mask view. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Elselvier/Saunders;
inductions, particularly when combined with nitrous 2015. p. 163–4.
oxide. The use of volatile agents carries the risk of 10. Haas DA, Yagiela JA. Agents used in general anes-
malignant hyperthermia; therefore, appropriate thesia, deep sedation, and conscious sedation. In:
preparation and precautions are necessary, Yagiela JA, Dowd FJ, Neidle EA, editors. Pharma-
including the immediate availability of dantrolene. cology and therapeutics for dentistry. 5th edition.
St Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p. 287–306.
SUMMARY 11. O’Connor S, Zhang YL, Christians U, et al. Remifen-
tanil and propofol undergo separation and layering
Oral and maxillofacial surgeons have a variety of when mixed in the same syringe for total intravenous
anesthetic agents at their disposal that can be anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2016;26(7):703–9.
used to provide sedation and anesthesia in the 12. Celesia GG, Chen RC, Bamforth BJ. Effects of keta-
ambulatory dental environment. It is critical that mine in epilepsy. Neurology 1975;25(2):169–72.
the anesthesia provider inherently understands 13. Brown RH, Wagner EM. Mechanisms of bron-
the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of choprotection by anesthetic induction agents: pro-
each anesthetic agent before its use. Furthermore, pofol versus ketamine. Anesthesiology 1999;90(3):
clinicians should also take into consideration the 822–8.
requirements of the patient and the surgical pro- 14. Haas DA, Harper DG. Ketamine: a review of its phar-
cedure itself when selecting anesthetic agents to macologic properties and use in ambulatory anes-
achieve maximal results. Such an approach thesia. Anesth Prog 1992;39(3):61–8.
164 Kramer & Brady
15. Domino EF, Domino SE, Smith RE, et al. Ketamine ki- 27. Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of alpha2-
netics in unmedicated and diazepam-premedicated adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology 2000;93(5):
subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984;36(5):645–53. 1345–9.
16. Grant IS, Nimmo WS, Clements JA. Pharmacoki- 28. Barash PG. Clinical anesthesia. 6th edition. Philadel-
netics and analgesic effects of i.m. and oral keta- phia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
mine. Br J Anaesth 1981;53(8):805–10. 2009.
17. Annetta MG, Iemma D, Garisto C, et al. Ketamine: 29. Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, et al. A comparison of
new indications for an old drug. Curr Drug Targets intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
2005;6(7):789–94. for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a
18. Panzer O, Moitra V, Sladen RN. Pharmacology of double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anesth
sedative-analgesic agents: dexmedetomidine, remi- Analg 2008;106(6):1715–21.
fentanil, ketamine, volatile anesthetics, and the role 30. Larsson PG, Eksborg S, Lonnqvist PA. Incidence of
of peripheral mu antagonists. Crit Care Clin 2009; bradycardia at arrival to the operating room after
25(3):451–69, vii. oral or intravenous premedication with clonidine in
19. Hijazi Y, Boulieu R. Contribution of CYP3A4, children. Paediatr Anaesth 2015;25(9):956–62.
CYP2B6, and CYP2C9 isoforms to N-demethylation 31. Gazelka HM, Rho RH. Opioid pharmacology. In:
of ketamine in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Murray MJ, Harrison BA, Mueller JT, et al, editors.
Dispos 2002;30(7):853–8. Faust’s anesthesiology review. 4th edition. Philadel-
20. Herd DW, Anderson BJ, Holford NH. Modeling the phia: Elselvier/Saunders; 2015. p. 168–9.
norketamine metabolite in children and the implica-
32. Christrup LL. Morphine metabolites. Acta Anaesthe-
tions for analgesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2007;17(9):
siol Scand 1997;41(1 Pt 2):116–22.
831–40.
33. Fentanyl Citrate Injection [package insert]. Lake For-
21. Bolze S, Boulieu R. HPLC determination of ketamine,
est, IL: Hospira, Inc; 2017.
norketamine, and dehydronorketamine in plasma
34. Sufentanil Citrate Injection [package insert]. Lake
with a high-purity reversed-phase sorbent. Clin
Forest, IL: Akorn, Inc; 2014.
Chem 1998;44(3):560–4.
35. Alfentanil HCl Injection [package insert]. Lake For-
22. Badrinath S, Avramov MN, Shadrick M, et al. The
est, IL 60045: Akorn, Inc; 2013.
use of a ketamine-propofol combination during
monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2000; 36. Glass PSA, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the phar-
90(4):858–62. macokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifenta-
23. Blaise GA. Ketamine. In: Murray MJ, Harrison BA, nil. Anesth Analg 1999;89(Supplement):7.
Mueller JT, et al, editors. Faust’s anesthesiology re- 37. Desai MS, Desai SP. Discovery of modern anes-
view. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Elselvier/Saunders; thesia: a counterfactual narrative about Crawford
2015. p. 166–7. W. Long, Horace Wells, Charles T. Jackson, and Wil-
24. Lebrun T, Van Elstraete AC, Sandefo I, et al. Lack of liam T. G. Morton. AANA J 2015;83(6):410–5.
a pre-emptive effect of low-dose ketamine on post- 38. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Inhalation
operative pain following oral surgery. Can J Anaesth anesthetics. Chapter 8. In: Butterworth JF,
2006;53(2):146–52. Mackey DC, Wasnick JD, editors. Morgan & Mikhail’s
25. Hadhimane A, Shankariah M, Neswi KV. Pre-emptive clinical anesthesiology. 5th edition. New York: The
analgesia with ketamine for relief of postoperative McGraw-Hill Companies; 2013. p. 153–74.
pain after surgical removal of impacted mandibular 39. Becker DE, Rosenberg M. Nitrous oxide and the
third molars. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2016;15(2): inhalation anesthetics. Anesth Prog 2008;55(4):
156–63. 124–30 [quiz: 131–2].
26. Muzyk AJ, Fowler JA, Norwood DK, et al. Role of 40. Wilson S, Alcaino EA. Survey on sedation in paediat-
alpha2-agonists in the treatment of acute alcohol ric dentistry: a global perspective. Int J Paediatr
withdrawal. Ann Pharmacother 2011;45(5):649–57. Dent 2011;21(5):321–32.