Reflection Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Superior (20 points) Sufficient (15 points) Minimal (10 points) Unacceptable (5 points)
Response demonstrates a general
Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of, Response demonstrates a minimal Response demonstrates a lack of
reflection on, and personalization the theories, concepts, and/or strategies reflection on, and personalization reflection on, or personalization of, the
of, the theories, concepts, and/or presented in the course materials to of, the theories, concepts, and/or theories, concepts, and/or strategies
Depth of strategies presented in the course date. Viewpoints and interpretations are strategies presented in the course presented in the course materials to
Reflection materials to date. Viewpoints and supported. Appropriate examples are materials to date. Viewpoints and date. Viewpoints and interpretations
interpretations are insightful and provided, as applicable. interpretations are unsupported or are missing, inappropriate, and/or
well supported. Clear, detailed supported with flawed arguments. unsupported. Examples, when
examples are provided, as Examples, when applicable, are not applicable, are not provided.
applicable. provided or are irrelevant to the
assignment.
Response includes all components Response includes all components and Response is missing some Response excludes essential
and meets or exceeds all meets all requirements indicated in the components and/or does not fully components and/or does not address
Required requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of meet the requirements indicated in the requirements indicated in the
Components instructions. Each question or part the assignment is addressed. All the instructions. Some questions or instructions. Many parts of the
of the assignment is addressed attachments and/or additional parts of the assignment are not assignment are addressed minimally,
thoroughly. All attachments and/or documents are included, as required. addressed. Some attachments and inadequately, and/or not at all.
additional documents are included, additional documents, if required,
as required. are missing or unsuitable for the
purpose of the assignment.
Writing is unclear and/or Writing is unclear and disorganized.
Writing is clear, concise, and well Writing is mostly clear, concise, and disorganized. Thoughts are not Thoughts ramble and make little sense.
organized with excellent well organized with good expressed in a logical manner. There are numerous spelling,
Structure sentence/paragraph construction. sentence/paragraph construction. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout
Thoughts are expressed in a Thoughts are expressed in a coherent grammar, or syntax errors per page the response.
coherent and logical manner. There and logical manner. There are no more of writing.
are no more than three spelling, than five spelling, grammar, or syntax
grammar, or syntax errors per page errors per page of writing.
of writing.
Response shows strong evidence Response shows evidence of synthesis Response shows little evidence of Response shows no evidence of
Evidence and of synthesis of ideas presented and of ideas presented and insights gained synthesis of ideas presented and synthesis of ideas presented and
Practice insights gained throughout the throughout the entire course. The insights gained throughout the insights gained throughout the entire
entire course. The implications of implications of these insights for the entire course. Few implications of course. No implications for the
these insights for the respondent's respondent's overall teaching practice these insights for the respondent's respondent's overall teaching practice
overall teaching practice are are presented, as applicable. overall teaching practice are are presented, as applicable.
thoroughly detailed, as applicable. presented, as applicable.
