Scribd
Upload
58 views3 pages

Evolution of the Philippine Court of Appeals

The document provides information on the legal basis and mandate of the Court of Appeals in the Philippines. It discusses how the Court of Appeals was originally created in 1935 to serve as an appellate court between the Supreme Court and trial courts. Over the decades, various laws and acts have changed the structure and size of the Court of Appeals. Currently, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review final judgments from regional trial courts and certain quasi-judicial agencies, and to adjudicate other cases under its authority.

Uploaded by

Maymay Javines
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
58 views3 pages

Evolution of the Philippine Court of Appeals

The document provides information on the legal basis and mandate of the Court of Appeals in the Philippines. It discusses how the Court of Appeals was originally created in 1935 to serve as an appellate court between the Supreme Court and trial courts. Over the decades, various laws and acts have changed the structure and size of the Court of Appeals. Currently, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review final judgments from regional trial courts and certain quasi-judicial agencies, and to adjudicate other cases under its authority.

Uploaded by

Maymay Javines
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Court of Appeals

Legal Basis
z Commonwealth Act No. 3 (December 31, 1935) created the Court of Appeals, introducing a
new appellate layer between the Supreme Court and the courts of first instance.
z Commonwealth Act No. 259 (March 1938) named Appellate Judges as Associate Justices and increased
their number from the original 11 magistrates to 15 (further increased to 19 by EO 395, December 1941).
z Executive Order No. 27 (January 1944) regionalized the Court of Appeals pursuant to Act. No.
10 of the Japanese-sponsored Philippine Republic.
z Republic Act No. 52 (October 4, 1946) re-created the Court of Appeals (abolished by President
Sergio Osmeña through EO 37, March 1945), with a Presiding Justice and 14 Associate Justices.
z Republic Act No. 296 (June 1948), the Judiciary Act of 1948, introduced the petition for review
as a mode of review of decisions of the courts of first instance.
z Presidential Decree No. 1482 (June 10, 1978) increased the membership of the Court from 18
(RA 1605, August 1956) and 24 (RA 5204, June 1968) to 45 Justices.
z Batas Pambansa Blg. 129 (August 14, 1981), the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980, converted
the Court of Appeals into the Intermediate Appellate Court consisting of a Presiding Appellate
Justice and 49 Associate Appellate Justices.
z Executive Order No. 33 (July 28, 1986) restored the original name to Court of Appeals with a
Presiding Justice and 50 Associate Justices.
z Republic Act No. 7902 (February 23, 1995) expanded the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals,
amending for the purpose Section Nine of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129.
z Republic Act No. 8246 (December 30, 1996) created six additional Divisions in the Court of
Appeals, increasing the number of CA Justices from 51 to 69 Justices.

Mandate

The Court of Appeals is vested with the power to review all final judgments, decisions, resolutions, orders or
awards of Regional Trial Courts and quasi-judicial agencies, instrumentalities, boards or commissions,
except those falling within the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; to try cases and conduct hearings,
receive evidence and perform any and all acts necessary to resolve factual issues raised in cases falling
within its original and appellate jurisdictions, including the power to grant and conduct new trials or further
proceedings. It issues writs of mandamus prohibition, certiorari, habeas corpus, quo warrant and auxiliary
writs or processes, and writs of amparo and habeas data in the exercise of its concurrent jurisdiction with the
Supreme Court, Sandigabayan, and the Regional Trial Courts.
764
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK (CAP)

Societal Goal A Just, Peaceful and Progressive Society

Rule of Law
Sectoral Goal

Expeditious and Judicious Exercise of Judicial Function/Adjudication


Organizational of Cases Under its Jurisdiction
Outcome

Resolutions/Decisions in Appealed and Other Cases Under its Jurisdiction


Major Final Output

Adjudication/Review of Appealed and Other Cases Under its Jurisdiction


P/A/P

765
PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS
(Amount in Thousand Pesos)

FY 2009 MFO BUDGET

By MFO/By Expense Class


(In thousand pesos)
Particulars PS MOOE CO TOTAL % Share
MFO

Resolutions/Decisions in Appealed and Other 551,389 221,089 111,216 883,694 100%


Cases Under its Jurisdiction

TOTAL 551,389 221,089 111,216 883,694 100%

% Share 62.40% 25.01% 12.59% 100%

By Expense Class
(Total Budget = P883,694,000)

CO
12.59%

MOOE PS
25.01% 62.40%

766

You might also like