Sulfate Resistance of RFCC Spent Catalyst-Blended Portland Cement
Sulfate Resistance of RFCC Spent Catalyst-Blended Portland Cement
www.elsevier.es/bsecv
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:                                      The reuse of spent catalysts from residue fluid catalytic cracking (RFCC) units as pozzolanic
Received 5 April 2018                                 materials in cement and concrete production offers a number of important benefits. In
Accepted 26 September 2018                            spite of all these benefits, the durability performance of the produced blended cement is an
Available online 15 October 2018                      important issue to be considered. This study investigates the effects of RFCC spent catalyst
                                                      on durability performance of hardened Portland cement paste in a highly aggressive sulfate
Keywords:                                             environment. The 28-day cured paste specimens prepared from binary cement mixtures
Spent catalyst                                        incorporating different replacement levels of 0, 10, 20, and 30% (by mass) RFCC spent catalyst
Pozzolanic activity                                   at a constant water-to-cement ratio of 0.30 were exposed to 10 mass% solution of magnesium
Sulfate attack                                        sulfate. The accelerated sulfate attack under alternative cycles of wetting and drying was
Blended cement                                        studied by monitoring the changes in compressive strength, length, and mass of specimens
                                                      and also by the application of XRD, SEM and EDX techniques. Based on the results and a
                                                      comparison with plain Portland cement, binary cement mixtures exhibit a higher rate of
                                                      deterioration in spite of their significantly improved compressive strengths resulted from
                                                      pozzolanic reaction.
                                                        © 2018 SECV. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the
                                                                           CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
r e s u m e n
    ∗
   Corresponding author.
   E-mail address: ali.allahverdi@iust.ac.ir (A. Allahverdi).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2018.09.001
0366-3175/© 2018 SECV. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
104                       b o l e t í n d e l a s o c i e d a d e s p a ñ o l a d e c e r á m i c a y v i d r i o 5 8 (2 0 1 9) 103–114
                 100                                                                         the sample by reducing the iron to the ferrous state with SnCl2
                 90                                                                          and titrating with a standard solution of K2 Cr2 O7 . The Al2 O3
                 80
                                                                                             content is obtained from the ammonium hydroxide group by
                 70
                                                                                             subtracting the separately determined constituents that usu-
    Weight (%)
                 60
                 50                                                                          ally are present in significant amounts in the ammonium
                 40                                                                          hydroxide precipitate. Magnesium is precipitated as magne-
                 30                                                                          sium ammonium phosphate from the filtrate after removal of
                 20        (c)      (b)                 (a)
                                                                                             calcium. The precipitate is ignited and weighed as Mg2 P2 O7 .
                 10
                                                                                             The MgO equivalent is then calculated. To determine the sul-
                  0
                       1           10                  100                  1000             fur content, sulfate is precipitated from an acid solution of
                                     Particle size (µm)                                      the sample with BaCl2 . The precipitate is ignited and weighed
                                                                                             as BaSO4 and the SO3 equivalent is calculated. The sample
Fig. 1 – Particle size distributions of (a) RFCC spent catalyst
                                                                                             is ignited in a muffle furnace at a controlled temperature.
before grinding, (b) RFCC spent catalyst after grinding, and
                                                                                             The loss is supposed to represent CO2 and the total mois-
(c) type II Portland cement.
                                                                                             ture in the sample. This test method covers the determination
                                                                                             of Na2 O and K2 O by atomic absorption or flame photometry.
                                                                                             For PC, the relative errors related to CaO and SiO2 contents
of PC and SC before and after grinding. A comparison of the                                  were less than 3% and the relative errors of the remaining
two particle size distribution curves (Fig. 1a and b) clearly                                components were less than 5%. For SC and natural pozzolan,
shows that after grinding, the mass fraction of particles less                               the relative errors of the Al2 O3 and SiO2 contents were less
than 50 m has significantly increased. As seen, in the ground                                than 4% and the relative errors of the remaining compo-
SC almost 95% of the grains are in the range between 5 and                                   nents were less than 6%. For silica fume, the relative errors
90 m, whereas such a percentage is related to the grain size                                of the SiO2 the remaining constituents were less than 2 and
of 2–35 m in PC.                                                                            5%, respectively. The obtained results revealed that the cata-
    The chemical composition and physical properties of SC,                                  lyst was mainly comprised of SiO2 and Al2 O3 . As seen, these
PC, silica fume, and natural pozzolan are presented in Table 1.                              two components account for over 95% of the total mass of
To determine the chemical composition of the SC, wet ana-                                    the material. This SC is therefore a relatively high siliceous
lytical methods were applied in accordance with ASTM C114                                    material and according to ASTM C618 [35], it could chemi-
[34] and for the results to be enough accurate, two individ-                                 cally be considered as a relatively good artificial pozzolana.
ual samples were analyzed separately and the average values                                  Silica fume and natural pozzolan were used in pozzolanic
were reported as the result. In these test methods, silicon diox-                            activity measurements as reference materials for comparison
ide (SiO2 ) is determined gravimetrically after the dissolution                              purposes.
of sample in HCl. The ammonium hydroxide group, namely                                           The mineralogical phase composition of the SC was deter-
aluminum, iron, titanium, and phosphorus are precipitated                                    mined using powder X-ray diffractometry (Cu, K␣ radiation).
from the filtrate, after SiO2 removal, by means of NH4 OH. The                                Fig. 2 depicts the X-ray diffraction pattern of the material.
precipitate is ignited and weighed as the oxides. The Fe2 O3                                 As seen, the shape of the pattern and the broad diffuse halo
content of the sample is determined on a separate portion of                                 at 2 = 23◦ clearly show that the SC is mainly an amorphous
 Physical properties
   Blaine fineness (m2 /kg)                             320 ± 5                          315 ± 5                          18,000 ± 70             309 ± 4
   Bulk density (kg/m3 )                               3130 ± 20                        2470 ± 15                        2130 ± 10               2650 ± 15
                                                                                                                              F: Faujasite
                                                    F
                                                             Q   F                                                            K: Kaolinite
                           Intensity (a.u.)
                                                                                        F                                     Q: Quartz
                                                                             F
                                                F        F
                                                                     K
                                                          20                     30                    40                50                   60
                                                                         2Theta angle (degree)
                           Paste specimen
                                                                         cm
                                                                         2
2 cm
                                                                              2 cm
                  Polyamide mold                                                      Hardened paste              Tap water         Sulfate solution
Fig. 3 – Sulfate exposure test: (1) molding the paste specimens, (2) demolding the specimens after 24 h, (3) curing of
specimens in tap water for 28 days, and (4) immersing the cured specimens in sulfate solution.
material. The few minor crystalline mineral phases present in                                  specimens were cured in tap water at 25 ◦ C until the age of 28
the material are faujasite, quartz, and kaolinite.                                             days.
 Spent catalyst                       66.8 ± 2.4                        67.7 ± 4.1                                                    69.2 ± 3.3                      70.2 ± 2.2
 Silica fume                          97.6 ± 1.7                        100.0 ± 1.5                                                   100.0 ± 1.8                     100.0 ± 1.3
 Natural Pozzolan                     42.3 ± 3.2                        58.8 ± 3.9                                                    60.4 ± 4.4                      64.9 ± 3.1
     L − L                                                                                                                                                                          970
       x   i                                                                                                                                                       1366-1417
L=              × 100                                                       (1)
        Li                                                                                                                 3640                                                1100               (a)
                                                                                                                                                                                            420
where L (%) is length change at the age of x; Lx (mm) is average
length of three bars at the age of x; Li (mm) is average initial                            4000                               3600    3200   2800   2400   2000    1600   1200       800       400
length of the same three bars after 28 days of curing.                                                                                           Wavenumber (cm-1)
   The mass changes were calculated by the following equa-
                                                                                      Fig. 4 – FTIR spectra of spent catalyst/lime (1:1) after (a) 7
tion:
                                                                                      and (b) 28 days of reaction.
     M − M 
       x   i
M=                × 100                                                     (2)
         Mi
                                                                                                                         140
in which M (%) is the mass change; Mi (g) is average mass of
                                                                                            Compressive strength (MPa)
                                                                                                                         130
three specimens after 28 days of curing; and Mx (g) is aver-
                                                                                                                         120
age mass change of the same three specimens at the age of
x.                                                                                                                       110
   Laser particle size analyzer (Sympatec, GmbH, HDD) was                                                                100
used for determination of particle size distribution of SC
                                                                                                                         90
before and after grinding. The pozzolanic activity of the SC
                                                                                                                                                                               OPC
was measured using a thermogravimetry equipment (Netzsch                                                                 80
                                                                                                                                                                               0.9OPC+0.1RFCC
model 429). The mineralogical phases were determined with                                                                                                                      0.8OPC+0.2RFCC
                                                                                                                         70
a JEOL JDX-8030 X-ray diffractometer using Cu-K␣ radiation                                                                                                                     0.7OPC+0.3RFCC
                                                                                                                         60
at 40 kV and 30 mA. For this purpose, PC and blended cement                                                                    0       20     40     60     80       100       120    140       160
paste specimens after 120 days of exposure to sulfate attack                                                                                         Curing time (day)
were used. The microstructural and elemental analyses were
carried out using a Cambridge Stereoscan 360 Scanning Elec-                           Fig. 5 – Compressive strength of plain Portland cement and
tron Microscope device at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV.                           mixtures containing RFCC spent catalyst stored in tap
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed                          water for continued curing.
using a Shimadzu FTIR 8400s Spectrophotometer in trans-
mittance mode from 400 to 4000 cm−1 using standard KBr
technique.
                                                                                      reactivity with hydrated lime and can be considered as a very
                                                                                      good pozzolanic material.
Results and discussion                                                                   Pozzolanic activity of the SC was also confirmed by FTIR
                                                                                      spectroscopy studies. Fig. 4 shows the FTIR spectra obtained
Pozzolanic activity of spent catalyst                                                 from samples of SC/lime (1:1) after 7 and 28 days of curing.
                                                                                      The more relevant absorption bands include 3640 cm−1 for
The results of pozzolanic activity measurements for the SC                            –OH of calcium hydroxide, 1366–1417 cm−1 for carbonates (as
and the reference materials (silica fume and natural pozzolan)                        lime impurities), 1100 cm−1 for vibrations of valence Si-O(Al)-
are presented in Table 2. As can be seen and compared to silica                       O, 970 cm−1 for calcium silicate hydrates and 420 cm−1 for
fume as a material exhibiting very strong pozzolanic proper-                          calcium aluminate and calcium aluminosilicate hydrates. As
ties and also to a typical natural pozzolan that is currently                         can be seen, both bands at 3640 and 1100 cm−1 belonging to
being used by Iranian cement industry for the purpose of natu-                        lime and SC, respectively, noticeably decrease from 7 to 28 days
ral pozzolan-blended cements production, SC has a very good                           of reaction while the band at 970 cm−1 belonging to calcium
108                                                        b o l e t í n d e l a s o c i e d a d e s p a ñ o l a d e c e r á m i c a y v i d r i o 5 8 (2 0 1 9) 103–114
                                      120                                                                           during the first 15 days of the exposure time and after that
                                                                                                                    exhibited compressive strength losses at significantly much
                                      100                                                                           higher rates compared to plain PC. All the mixtures containing
   Compressive strength (MPa)
                       0.6                                                                                                                3
                                       OPC                                                                                                          OPC
                       0.5             0.7OPC+0.3RFCC
                                                                                                                                        2.5         0.9OPC+0.1RFCC
                                       0.8OPC+0.2RFCC
   Length change (%)
                                       0.9OPC+0.1RFCC
                                                                                                                                                    0.8OPC+0.2RFCC
                       0.4
                                                                                                                                          2         0.7OPC+0.3RFCC
                                                                                                                                        0.5
                        0
                             15   20     25   30   35    40   45   50   55    60   65   70   75    80
                                                        Exposure time (day)                                                               0
                                                                                                                                               15         30         45     60   75
Fig. 7 – Length changes versus exposure time for plain                                                                                  -0.5
Portland cement and mixtures containing RFCC spent
catalyst.                                                                                                                                -1
                                                                                                                                                           Exposure time (day)
                                                                                       C
                                                                                               P
                                                                                                   P
                                                                       P                   G
                                                         E    G                                                           P
                                                                                   P                                  P
                                                                                                                                    C: Calcite
                                                                                                                                    E: Ettringite
                                                                                                                                    G: Gypsum
                                                                                                                                    P: Portlandite
(a)
                                                     5   10       15       20     25   30          35   40       45       50   55    60     65       70
                                                                                       2Theta angle (degree)
Fig. 9 – XRD patterns of paste specimens after 120 days of exposure to sulfate environment; (a) plain Portland cement and
(b) binary mixture containing 20 mass% RFCC spent catalyst.
   The mass losses observed for plain PC specimens were                                                 are shown in Fig. 9. X-ray diffractometry analyses were per-
due to spalling of small pieces from the surfaces of the spec-                                          formed on samples prepared from exposed surfaces. The two
imens. In fact, for plain PC specimens, the sulfate attack is                                           XRD patterns are very similar showing the presence of Port-
mainly limited to the exposed surface regions. Intensive gyp-                                           landite, gypsum, ettringite, and calcite in both samples. No
sum deposition in these areas gradually leads to intensifying                                           sign of anhydrous cement phases or hydration products were
disintegrating stresses, which finally result in the spalling of                                         observed probably due to relatively very high concentrations
pieces from surface regions [49]. In natural cases of sulfate                                           of major crystalline phases. Reduced Portlandite content in
attack, this phenomenon usually does not occur during rel-                                              binary cement mixture containing 20 mass% SC is due to its
atively short time periods about 45 days and here the main                                              partial consumption in pozzolanic reactions in addition to
reasons for such a severe and fast attack are the type of sulfate                                       its participation in the reactions with sulfate ions and also
and its relatively high concentration.                                                                  with atmospheric carbon dioxide. Calcite is a secondary reac-
   The continued mass gain of binary cement mixtures for                                                tion product due to the application of wetting-drying cycles.
longer exposure times compared to plain PC is due to the                                                When the specimens were exposed to open air atmosphere
presence of SC, which not only reduces the concentration of                                             during drying stage, part of Portlandite present in surface
calcium hydroxide inside the hardened cement paste, but also                                            layers of the specimens reacted with carbon dioxide result-
results in probably less concentrated expansion in the sur-                                             ing in the formation of calcite. The formation of gypsum
face regions. It is reasonable to assume that the specimens of                                          and ettringite due to the reaction of Portlandite with sul-
binary mixtures also undergo mass losses or shattering upon                                             fate ion and carbonation of Portlandite due to its reaction
continued longer exposure times.                                                                        with atmospheric carbon dioxide are common observations
                                                                                                        as reported earlier by many researchers [1,3–18,41–43]. An
X-ray diffraction analysis                                                                              important difference, however, lies in the kinetics of the dete-
                                                                                                        rioration phenomenon. The kinetics depends on four main
The XRD patterns of plain PC and the mixture containing                                                 factors including: (1) differences in chemical and mineralog-
20 mass% SC after 120 days of exposure to sulfate solution                                              ical compositions, (2) permeability of the cement paste, (3)
                                                                                                             100 µm
                         100 µm
Fig. 10 – SEM micrographs of hardened pastes after 120 days of curing in tap water (Left: plain Portland cement, Right:
mixture containing 20 mass% spent catalyst).
                              b o l e t í n d e l a s o c i e d a d e s p a ñ o l a d e c e r á m i c a y v i d r i o 5 8 (2 0 1 9) 103–114   111
a b
20 µm 20 µm
                             Ca
                                                                                                              Ca
                         S
                                                                                                      S
Ca Ca
Fig. 11 – SEM micrographs and EDX elemental analyses of gypsum crystals formed after 120 days of exposure to sulfate
solution in the paste specimens of (a) plain Portland cement and (b) mixture containing 20 mass% spent catalyst.
a b
                20 µm                                                                         20 µm
                              Ca
                                                                                                               Ca
                         S                                                                                S
                    Al
                                                                                                 Al
            Ca                                                                              Ca
Fig. 12 – SEM micrographs and EDX elemental analyses of ettringite crystals formed after 120 days of exposure to sulfate
solution in the paste specimens of (a) plain Portland cement and (b) mixture containing 20 mass% spent catalyst.
112                        b o l e t í n d e l a s o c i e d a d e s p a ñ o l a d e c e r á m i c a y v i d r i o 5 8 (2 0 1 9) 103–114
a b
                                                                                   20 µm
                        100 µm
Fig. 13 – SEM micrographs of microcracks formed after 120 days of exposure to sulfate solution in the paste specimens of (a)
plain Portland cement and (b) the mixture containing 20 mass% spent catalyst.
the type of attacking sulfate and its concentration, and (4)                        continuation of this process leads to enlarged microstructural
exposure conditions including the exertion of capillary suc-                        cracks and finally dimensional expansion, mass changes (gain
tion forces by wetting-drying cycles. Therefore, the kinetics                       and loss), and loss of compressive strength.
still requires extensive research activities to well under-
stand.
                                                                                    Conclusions
 [3] O.S. Baghabra, O.S.B. AL-Amoudi, Attack on plain and                            [23] R. Cherif, A.A. Hamami, A. Ait-Mokhtar, J.F. Meusnier, Study
     blended cements exposed to aggressive sulfate                                        of the pore solution and the microstructure of mineral
     environments, Cem. Concr. Compos. 24 (2002) 305–316.                                 additions blended cement pastes, Energy Procedia 139 (2017)
 [4] H.N. Atahan, D. Dikme, Use of mineral admixtures for                                 584–589.
     enhanced resistance against sulfate attack, Constr. Build.                      [24] J. Paya, J. Monzo, M.V. Borrachero, Physical, chemical and
     Mater. 25 (8) (2011) 3450–3457.                                                      mechanical properties of fluid catalytic cracking catalyst
 [5] Y. Cheng, S. Wei, S. Karen, Degradation mechanism of slag                            residue (FC3R) blended cements, Cem. Concr. Res. 31 (1)
     blended mortars immersed in sodium sulfate solution, Cem.                            (2001) 57–61.
     Concr. Res. 72 (2015) 37–47.                                                    [25] S. Nan, C. Zong-Huei, F. Hung-Yuan, Reuse of spent catalyst
 [6] S. Kandasamy, M.H. Shehata, Durability of ternary blends                             as fine aggregate in cement mortar, Cem. Concr. Compos. 23
     containing high calcium fly ash and slag against sodium                               (1) (2001) 111–118.
     sulphate attack, Constr. Build. Mater. 53 (2014) 267–272.                       [26] J. Paya, J. Monzo, M.V. Borrachero, S. Velazquez, M. Bonilla,
 [7] M. Sahmaran, O. Kaspa, K. Duru, I.O. Yaman, Effects of mix                           Determination of the pozzolanic activity of fluid catalytic
     composition and water–cement ratio on the sulfate                                    cracking residue. Thermogravimetric analysis studies on
     resistance of blended cements, Cem. Concr. Compos. 29                                FC3R–lime pastes, Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (7) (2003) 1085–1091.
     (2007) 159–167.                                                                 [27] J. Paya, J. Monzo, M.V. Borrachero, S. Velazquez, Cement
 [8] H. Binici, O. Aksogan, Sulfate resistance of plain and blended                       equivalence factor evaluations for fluid catalytic cracking
     cement, Cem. Concr. Compos. 28 (1) (2006) 39–46.                                     catalyst residue, Cem. Concr. Compos. 39 (2013) 12–17.
 [9] K.K. Sideris, A.E. Savva, J. Papayianni, Sulfate resistance and                 [28] R. Neves, C. Vicente, A. Castela, M.F. Montemor, Durability
     carbonation of plain and blended cements, Cem. Concr.                                performance of concrete incorporating spent fluid cracking
     Compos. 28 (1) (2006) 47–56.                                                         catalyst, Cem. Concr. Compos. 55 (2015) 308–314.
[10] E.E. Hekal, E. Kishar, H. Mostafa, Magnesium sulfate attack                     [29] K. Al-Jabri, M. Baawain, R. Taha, Z.S. Al-Kamyani, K.
     on hardened blended cement pastes under different                                    Al-Shamsi, A. Ishtieh, Potential use of FCC spent catalyst as
     circumstances, Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (9) (2002) 1421–1427.                             partial replacement of cement or sand in cement mortars,
[11] T.M. El Sokkary, H.H. Assal, A.M. Kandeel, Effect of silica                          Constr. Build. Mater. 39 (2013) 77–81.
     fume or granulated slag on sulphate attack of ordinary                          [30] H. Al-Dhamri, K. Melghit, Use of alumina spent catalyst and
     Portland and alumina cement blend, Ceram. Int. 30 (2) (2004)                         RFCC wastes from petroleum refinery to substitute bauxite
     133–138.                                                                             in the preparation of Portland clinker, J. Hazard. Mater. 179
[12] T. Lee, H.Y. Moon, R.N. Swamy, Sulfate attack and role of                            (2010) 852–859.
     silica fume in resisting strength loss, Cem. Concr. Compos.                     [31] ASTM C150/C150M-18, Standard Specification for Portland
     27 (1) (2005) 65–76.                                                                 Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
[13] N. Ghafoori, M. Najimi, H. Diawara, M.S. Islam, Effects of                      [32] ASTM C204-17, Standard Test Methods for Fineness of
     class F fly ash on sulfate resistance of Type V Portland                              Hydraulic Cement by Air-Permeability Apparatus, ASTM
     cement concretes under continuous and interrupted sulfate                            International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
     exposures, Constr. Build. Mater. 78 (2015) 85–91.                               [33] ASTM C188, Standard Test Method for Density of Hydraulic
[14] B. Chatveera, P. Letwattanaruk, Evaluation of sulfate                                Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
     resistance of cement mortars containing black rice husk ash,                    [34] ASTM C114, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of
     J. Environ. Manag. 90 (3) (2009) 1435–1441.                                          Hydraulic Cement, ASTM International, West
[15] W. Tangchirapat, T. Saeting, C. Jaturapitakkul, K. Kiattikomol,                      Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
     A. Siripanichgron, Use of waste ash from palm oil industry in                   [35] ASTM C618-12a, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and
     concrete, Waste Manag. 27 (2007) 81–88.                                              Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM
[16] P. Lukowski, A. Salih, Durability of mortars containing                              International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
     ground granulated blast-furnace slag in acid and sulphate                       [36] ASTM C1012, Standard Test Method for Length Change of
     environment, Procedia Eng. 108 (2015) 47–54.                                         Hydraulic Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulfate Solution,
[17] G. Li, A. Zhang, Z. Song, S. Liu, J. Zhang, Ground granulated                        ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
     blast furnace slag effect on the durability of ternary                          [37] P.K. Mehta, Sulfate attack on concrete: a critical review, in:
     cementitious system exposed to combined attack of chloride                           R.R. Villarreal (Ed.), Concrete Durability, Univ. Autonoma de
     and sulfate, Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (2018) 640–648.                               Nuevo Leon, 1993, pp. 107–132.
[18] A. Allahverdi, M. Akhondi, M. Mahinroosta, Superior sodium                      [38] H.F.W. Taylor, Cement Chemistry, second ed., Thomas
     sulfate resistance of a chemically activated phosphorus                              Telford publishing Ltd. Services, London, 1997.
     slag-based composite cement, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (3) (2017)                  [39] B. Felekoglu, K. Ramyar, K. Tosun, B. Musal, Sulfate
     1–9.                                                                                 resistances of different types of Turkish Portland cements by
[19] S. Velazquez, J. Monzo, M.V. Borrachero, L. Soriano, J. Paya,                        selecting the appropriate test methods, Constr. Build. Mater.
     Evaluation of the pozzolanic activity of spent FCC                                   20 (2006) 819–823.
     catalyst/fly ash mixtures in Portland cement pastes,                             [40] N.N. Naik, A.C. Jupe, S.R. Stock, A.P. Wilkinson, P.L. Lee, K.E.
     Thermochim. Acta 632 (2016) 29–36.                                                   Kurtis, Sulfate attack monitored by microCT and EDXRD:
[20] K.L. Lin, K.W. Lo, M.J. Hung, T.W. Cheng, Y.M. Chang,                                influence of cement type, water-to-cement ratio, and
     Recycling of spent catalyst and waste sludge from industry                           aggregate, Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (1) (2006) 144–159.
     to substitute raw materials in the preparation of Portland                      [41] M. Nabil Al-Akhras, Durability of metakaolin concrete to
     cement clinker, Sustain. Environ. Res. 27 (2017)                                     sulfate attack, Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (9) (2006) 1727–1734.
     251–257.                                                                        [42] Z. Ming-hua, J. Min-qiang, C. Jian-kang, Variation of flexural
[21] M.R. Shatat, Hydration behavior and mechanical properties                            strength of cement mortar attacked by sulfate ions, Eng.
     of blended cement containing various amounts of rice husk                            Fract. Mech. 75 (17) (2008) 4948–4957.
     ash in presence of metakaolin, Arab. J. Chem. 9 (2016)                          [43] C. Jian-kang, J. Min-qiang, Long-term evolution of delayed
     S1869–S1874.                                                                         ettringite and gypsum in Portland cement mortars under
[22] E. Kucukyildirim, B. Uzal, Characteristics of calcined natural                       sulfate erosion, Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2) (2009) 812–816.
     zeolites for use in high-performance pozzolan blended                           [44] B. Pacewska, I. Wilinska, M. Bukowska, W. Nocun-Wczelik,
     cements, Constr. Build. Mater. 73 (2014) 229–234.                                    Effect of waste aluminosilicate material on cement
114                       b o l e t í n d e l a s o c i e d a d e s p a ñ o l a d e c e r á m i c a y v i d r i o 5 8 (2 0 1 9) 103–114
     hydration and properties of cement mortars, Cem. Concr.                       [47] M. Santhanam, M.D. Cohen, J. Olek, Mechanism of sulfate
     Res. 32 (11) (2002) 1823–1830.                                                     attack: a fresh look. Part 1. Summary of experimental results,
[45] B. Pacewska, M. Bukowska, I. Wilinska, M. Swat, Modification                        Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (6) (2002) 915–921.
     of the properties of concrete by a new pozzolan—a waste                       [48] T. Aye, C.T. Oguchi, Resistance of plain and blended cement
     catalyst from the catalytic process in a fluidized bed, Cem.                        mortars exposed to severe sulfate attacks, Constr. Build.
     Concr. Res. 32 (1) (2002) 145–152.                                                 Mater. 25 (6) (2011) 2988–2996.
[46] A. Allahverdi, M. Mahdavan, Durability performance of RFCC                    [49] A. Allahverdi, M. Akhondi, M. Mahinroosta, A composite
     spent catalyst-blended Portland cement paste exposed to                            cement of high magnesium sulphate resistance, Mater.
     sea water attack, Ceramics-Silikaty 57 (4) (2013) 305–312.                         Constr. 68 (330) (2018) 1–11.