Gim 200446
Gim 200446
Gastroschisis and omphalocele are abdominal wall defects graphic features and outcomes of patients with these two
that were first described as early as the 16th century.1 However, conditions.
it was not until recently that these two conditions were catego-
rized as separate entities. In 1953, Moore and Stokes2 defined
MATERIALS AND METHODS
the two separate conditions, and in 1963, Duhamel3 empha-
sized their distinct pathogenesis and clinical presentations. It is A historical analysis of all probands with omphalocele and
currently taught that omphalocele is a more common condi- gastroschisis evaluated in the Genetics Division at the Univer-
tion than gastroschisis, occurring in 1 per 4000 live births com- sity of South Florida College of Medicine between January 2,
pared to 1 per 6000 for gastroschisis.4 Gastroschisis tends to be 1982 and December 31, 1999 was performed. All cases were
an isolated anomaly, whereas omphaloceles are frequently as- seen through the prenatal genetic clinics or as pediatric con-
sociated with chromosome abnormalities and other birth de- sultations, and were part of the 36,665 families evaluated by
fects.5 Thus, the long-term prognosis for infants with gastros- USF Genetics during the period. USF Genetics receives all ge-
chisis is considerably better than that for infants with netic consultations requested by pediatricians and obstetri-
omphalocele, in whom a 50% to 60% survival rate and fre- cians within the Tampa Bay area counties. Probands were re-
quently chronic medical problems are seen.5 trieved through the USF Genetics database and a chart analysis
Using the records of a single University Division of Genetics was performed on each proband. There were 127 probands
over a period of 18 years, the occurrence of omphalocele and with omphalocele (74 prenatal, 53 pediatric) and 121 with gas-
gastroschisis were compared, and associated abnormalities troschisis (92 prenatal, 29 pediatric).
and karyotypes were contrasted in addition to maternal demo- For each record, karyotype, associated anomalies, prematu-
rity, 1-year mortality rate, environmental exposures during
pregnancy, maternal diabetes, familial recurrence, and mater-
From the Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida College nal age were analyzed. Additional analyzed factors were incor-
of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
rect or missed prenatal diagnosis, twinning, and race. In order
Boris G. Kousseff, One Davis Blvd, Suite 604, Tampa, FL 33606.
to compare the two groups, P-values were calculated through
DOI: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000133919.68912.A3 the chi-square test. Polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, patent
Table 4
Medication use during pregnancy in mothers of 127 probands with
omphalocele and 121 probands with gastroschisis
Omphalocele, 66 cases (52%)
Prenatal vitamins 30
a
OTC analgesic 21
Antibiotic 16
OTCa cold medication 10
Corticosteroids 3
Iron 3
Synthroid 3
Fig. 1. Characteristics of study participants as compared to general Tampa Bay area
Anticonvulsant 3 population.
Antidepressant 3
Birth control pills 2 DISCUSSION
Insulin 1
This study was initiated because an increase in the number of
Gastroschisis, 60 cases (50%) gastroschisis cases was observed by the Genetics Division at USF.
Prenatal vitamins 30 In this study, the ratio of omphalocele to gastroschisis was 127 to
a
OTC analgesic 15 121 or 1:1, compared to the expected ratio of 3:2. If only the live-
born were included, the ratio remains 1:1, with 82 cases of ompha-
Antibiotic 22
locele and 79 cases of gastroschisis. Other studies around the
OTCa cold medication 7 world have found increases in gastroschisis prevalence, along with
Corticosteroids 5 a decrease in omphalocele.4,6 –9 Rankin et al.7 reported an increase
Iron 4 in the incidence of gastroschisis without a corresponding change
in omphalocele. Theories to account for these incidence changes
Insulin 1
have included an environmental agent, inaccurate classification,
P ⫽ 0.86. limited family histories, and a higher familial recurrence risk.10 No
a
Over-the-counter.
cases of gastroschisis were recorded in British Columbia before
1969 because the condition was unknown and previous cases were
diagnosed as omphalocele.11
and 1 pair of monozygotic girls. All 9 pairs were discordant for There were no reported cases of omphalocele stillbirths, al-
the defect. In the monozygotic pair, twin A had the omphalo- though the figure in the literature is 11% to 12% (P ⬍ 0.001).9
cele as an isolated anomaly, whereas twin B had defects (exstro- However, excluding elective terminations and pregnancies of
phy of the bladder, imperforate anus, and spinal abnormali- unknown outcome, the spontaneous termination or miscar-
ties) that complemented her sister’s omphalocele in the OEIS riage rate was 25% (10/39). Perhaps differences in criteria for
complex. Twin B died at age 9 hours due to respiratory arrest. stillbirth versus miscarriage contribute to the discrepancy, or
There were three dizygotic twin pregnancies in the gastros- maybe there was a bias in reporting.
chisis group (2.5%), with 1 pair concordant for the defect. A The percentage of associated anomalies was 73% for
fourth pregnancy ended in miscarriage and a resorbed twin omphaloceles versus 23% for gastroschisis. In addition, the
proportion of cases with chromosomal abnormalities was also
was suspected. The DZ twin prevalence was higher compared
higher in the omphalocele group (20%) compared to the gas-
to the incidence in the general Tampa Bay area population (P
troschisis group (0%). Similar findings have been reported in
⫽ 0.98). No consanguinity was reported in either group.
previous studies,5,7,9 with cardiac defects as the most common
Mean maternal age was 21.8 years for gastroschisis and 27.2
associated anomaly with both omphalocele and gastroschisis.5
years for omphalocele. Maternal age distribution for all cases of The prematurity rate in the two groups was higher than the
gastroschisis and omphalocele, in comparison to the general 15% rate in the general Tampa Bay area population, although
Tampa Bay area population, is shown in Fig. 1. Racial compo- the difference between the two groups is not significant. Re-
sition was similar to that of the Tampa Bay area population ports of prematurity rates in gastroschisis have been histori-
(Caucasian 75%, African American 13%, Hispanics 10%, Ori- cally higher, ranging from 40% to 67%,6 compared to the 10%
ental 2%). For the omphalocele group, 93/127 (73%) were to 23% rate for omphalocele.5 Perhaps differences in prematu-
Caucasian, 20/127 (16%) African American, 11/127 (9%) His- rity criteria may account for the higher prematurity rate in this
panic, and 4/127 (3%) Asian. In the gastroschisis group, 93/121 omphalocele group compared to previous studies.
(77%) were Caucasian, 14/121 (12%) African American, and The 1-year mortality rate for the omphalocele group was
13/121 (11%) Hispanic. significantly higher than the gastroschisis group. The 4 cases of
congenital heart defects in the gastroschisis group were 2 pro- derrepresented in this study. In addition, chart review studies
bands with tetralogy of Fallot, 1 with VSD, and 1 with trans- are also vulnerable to interpretive bias in obtaining data, but
position of the great vessels with VSD; none of the children had this bias was limited through physical examination of liveborn
additional gastrointestinal defects. children by the same physicians, and reviewing official sono-
Cocaine and ephedrine have long been suspects as teratogens gram and autopsy reports.
for gastroschisis. These chemicals are vasoconstrictors, potentially The 248 patients with gastroschisis and omphalocele evalu-
causing occlusion of fetal abdominal wall arteries, with the defect ated through the USF genetics clinics (pediatric and prenatal)
resulting from inadequate blood supply.12 In this series, only two corroborated the reported observation in other medical facili-
mothers admitted use of cocaine during pregnancy. Cold medi- ties/specialties that since the 1960s, gastroschisis is increasing
cations were taken frequently and the majority of mothers did not in prevalence relative to omphalocele,4,6 –9 and may be more
remember which ones they used. Many of the over-the-counter common than isolated omphaloceles in liveborns. Although
cold medications contain ephedrine. However, similar findings there is no clear reason for the change in numbers, this statistic
were noted in the omphalocele group. Thus, ephedrine-contain- should be reflected in the textbooks that still present ompha-
ing drugs and cocaine did not appear to play a role in the abdom- locele as more common.
inal wall defects.
The recurrence risk for nonsyndromic abdominal wall de- ACKNOWLEDGMENT
fects has been postulated to be low (⬍ 1%),10,13,14 but Torfs and
This study was funded in part by a Children Medical Service
Curry10 found a 3.5% recurrence risk for gastroschisis by ex-
grant from Florida Health and Rehabilitative Services.
tending the pedigree to second cousins. They suggested that
incomplete family histories result in underreported familial
cases10 and that counseling of families with a case of gastros- References
chisis should change accordingly. Also, inaccurate diagnosis or 1. Mayer T, Black R, Matlak M, Johnson D. Gastroschisis and omphalocele: An eight-
year review. Ann Surg 1980;192:783–787.
documentation in medical records may change the frequency 2. Moore TC, Stokes GE. Gastroschisis: Report of two cases treated by a modification
of recurrence of ventral wall defects within a family.10,13 The- of the gross operation for omphalocele. Surgery 1953;33:112–120.
ories on mode of inheritance have ranged from Mendelian 3. Duhamel B. Embryology of exomphalos and allied malformations. Arch Dis Child
1963;38:142–147.
monogenic to multifactorial.10,13–15 4. Buyse ML, editor. Birth defects encyclopedia. Cambridge: Blackwell Scientific Pub-
In this study, there was a significant increase of twin pairs lications; 1990:1289 –1290.
only among the omphalocele probands. It is known that twins 5. Stevenson RE, Hall JG, Goodman RM. Omphalocele and gastroschisis. In: Steven-
son RE, Hall JG, Goodman RM, editors. Human malformations and related anom-
have a higher rate of birth defects.4 Monozygotic (MZ) twins alies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993:879 – 882.
are at a higher risk than dizygotic (DZ) twins.4 In this series all 6. Suita S, Okamatsu T, Yamamoto T. Changing profile of abdominal wall defects in
twin pairs but one in the gastroschisis group were discordant Japan: results of a national survey. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:66 –71.
7. Rankin J, Dillon E, Wright C. Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in the
for the defect. In the concordant pair, one of the twins had a north of England, 1986 –1996: occurrence and outcome. Prenat Diagn 1999;19:662–
congenital heart defect in addition to the gastroschisis. The 668.
mother drank two beers and smoked 1 to 3 cigarettes a day. 8. Kitchanan S, Patole SK, Muller R, Whitehall JS. Neonatal outcome of gastroschisis
and exomphalos: A 10-year review. J Pediatr Child Health 2000;36:428 – 430.
Smoking and alcohol have been associated with gastroschisis.16 9. Tan KH, Kilby MD, Whittle MJ, Beattie BR, Booth IW, Botting BJ. Congenital
In this study, the gastroschisis group had younger mothers anterior abdominal wall defects in England and Wales 1987–93: Retrospective anal-
than did the omphalocele group and the general population. ysis of OPCS data. BMJ 1996;313:903–906.
10. Torfs CP, Curry CJ. Familial cases of gastroschisis in a population-based registry.
Although mothers under 20 years of age comprise 14% of the Am J Med Genet 1993;45:465– 467.
general population, they comprised 39% of the gastroschisis 11. Baird PA, MacDonald EC. An epidemiologic study of congenital malformations of
group. There were no mothers 40 years or older in the gastros- the anterior abdominal wall in more than half a million consecutive live births. Am J
Hum Genet 1981;33:470 – 478.
chisis group. In an earlier study,17 the mean maternal age was 12. Werler M, Sheehan JE, Mitchell AA. Association of vasoconstrictive exposure with
20.4 years for gastroschisis, as compared to 28.0 years for the risks of gastroschisis and small intestinal atresia. Epidemiol 2003;14:349 –354.
general population. Boyd et al.18 also found younger mothers 13. Bugge M, Petersen MB, Christensen MF. Monozygotic twins discordant for gastros-
chisis: Case report and review of the literature of twins and familial occurrence of
in their gastroschisis group. Torfs et al.19 found the incidence gastroschisis. Am J Med Genet 1994;52:223–226.
of gastroschisis to be highest among mothers under 20 years 14. Yang P, Beaty TH, Khoury MJ, Chee E, Stewart W, Gordis L. Genetic-epidemilogic
old, with the incidence declining steeply with increasing ma- study of omphalocele and gastroschisis: Evidence for heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet
1992;44:668 – 675.
ternal age; only 7% of mothers were over 29 years of age in their 15. Pryde PG, Greb A, Isada NB, Johnson MB, Klein M, Evans MI. Familial omphalo-
group. The reason for the younger maternal age is unknown.19 cele: consideration in genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet 1992;44:624 – 627.
There is no guarantee that every patient with gastroschisis or 16. Torfs CP, Velie EM, Oechsli FW. A population-based study of gastroschisis: demo-
graphic, pregnancy, and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology 1994;50:44 –53.
omphalocele was referred to practice, such as those whose 17. Penman DG, Fisher RM, Noblett HR, Soothill PW. Increase in incidence of gastros-
mothers had no appreciable prenatal risk factors or family his- chisis in the south west of England in 1995. Br J Obstet Gynec 1998;105:328 –331.
tory. Gastroschisis patients are subject to being underreferred 18. Boyd PA, Bhattacharjee A, Gould S, Manning N, Chamberlain P. Outcome of pre-
natally diagnosed anterior abdominal wall defects. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
because of the low rate of associated abnormalities. For un- 1998;78:F209 –F213.
known reasons, stillborn omphalocele patients were also un- 19. Torfs C, Curry C, Roeper P. Gastroschisis. J Pediatr 1990;116:1– 6.