100% found this document useful (1 vote)
793 views4 pages

Daras - Me12 - Laboratory Activity 5

- The HR department of ABC Manufacturing studied job performance and satisfaction of 120 employees, collecting data on gender, job status, education level, and length of service. - ANOVA tests found a significant difference in job satisfaction based on length of service but not education level. - ANOVA tests also found a significant difference in job performance based on both length of service and education level.

Uploaded by

legion maxx
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
793 views4 pages

Daras - Me12 - Laboratory Activity 5

- The HR department of ABC Manufacturing studied job performance and satisfaction of 120 employees, collecting data on gender, job status, education level, and length of service. - ANOVA tests found a significant difference in job satisfaction based on length of service but not education level. - ANOVA tests also found a significant difference in job performance based on both length of service and education level.

Uploaded by

legion maxx
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Name: Fredrich Louie A.

Daras Prof: Carmela Reyes

The HR department of ABC Manufacturing Industry studied the Job Performance and Job satisfaction
of 120 employees.
The information such as gender and job status were collected.
Given below are the hypotheses of the study
No: There is no significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the employees when they
are grouped according to educational attainment and length of service.
Na: There is a significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the employees when they
are grouped according to educational attainment and length of service

α= 0.5, n= 120
Test Statistic = Analysis of Variance (Anova)
Decision rule: Reject the null hypothesis if F computed is greater than F-critical or if the p-value is
less than 0.05. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

ANOVA
Job Satisfaction
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 2.008 3 .669 3.070 .031
Within Groups 25.296 116 .218
Total 27.304 119

Job Satisfaction
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
New_LengthService N 1 2
8-15 years 30 3.9713
16-23 years 30 4.1230 4.1230
7 and below 30 4.2147 4.2147
24-31 years 30 4.3243
Sig. .187 .344
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 30.000.
ANOVA
Job Satisfaction
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups .556 2 .278 1.215 .300
Within Groups 26.749 117 .229
Total 27.304 119

Job Satisfaction
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha
= 0.05
new_educationattainment N 1
BS/AB 40 4.0832
with MA units 40 4.1437
MA graduate 40 4.2480
Sig. .276
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 40.000.

Decision: The result in length of service the F value (3.070) is greater than the S squares (2.008) and
the p value (0.31) is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected. The result in Educational
Attainment the F value (.278) is less than the S squares (.556), and the p value (.300) is greater than
0.05, the null hypothesis was not rejected.
Conclusion: Therefore, there is a significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the
employees when they are grouped according to length of service, and there is no significant
difference among the level of job satisfaction of the employees when they are grouped according to
educational attainment
No: There is no significant difference among the level of job performance of the employees when they
are grouped according to educational attainment and length of service.
Na: There is a significant difference among the level of job performance of the employees when they
are grouped according to educational attainment and length of service.

α= 0.05, n= 120
Test Statistic = Analysis of Variance (Anova)
Decision rule: Reject the null hypothesis if F computed is greater than F-critical or if the p-value is
less than 0.05. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

ANOVA
Job Performance
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 3.344 3 1.115 4.040 .009
Within Groups 32.007 116 .276
Total 35.352 119

Job Performance
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
New_LengthService N 1 2
8-15 years 30 3.5573
7 and below 30 3.7877 3.7877
16-23 years 30 3.9307
24-31 years 30 3.9910
Sig. .329 .441
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 30.000.

ANOVA
Job Performance
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 2.535 2 1.268 4.520 .013
Within Groups 32.816 117 .280
Total 35.352 119

Job Performance
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
new_educationattainment N 1 2
BS/AB 40 3.6268
with MA units 40 3.8435 3.8435
MA graduate 40 3.9798
Sig. .164 .485
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 40.000.

Decision: Since the result in length of service, the F value (4.040) is greater than the S squares
(3.344) and p value (0.009) is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected. The result in
educational attainment, the F value (4.520) is greater than S squares (2.535) and the p value (0.013)
is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected.
Conclusion: Since the result of length of service and educational attainment reject the null hypothesis,
there is a significant difference among the level of job performance of the employees when they are
grouped according to educational attainment and length of service.

You might also like