0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views3 pages

Ved V. Datar

This document summarizes key facts about zeroes of holomorphic functions: 1) Zeroes of holomorphic functions are isolated points, meaning there is an open disc around each zero where the function is non-zero. 2) The order of a zero is defined as the power of the leading term when the function is written as a product of the term (z-a) and a non-vanishing function. 3) A function is identically zero on a connected domain if all of its derivatives are zero at one point in the domain. This implies zeroes of holomorphic functions are isolated.

Uploaded by

Joseph Chavoya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views3 pages

Ved V. Datar

This document summarizes key facts about zeroes of holomorphic functions: 1) Zeroes of holomorphic functions are isolated points, meaning there is an open disc around each zero where the function is non-zero. 2) The order of a zero is defined as the power of the leading term when the function is written as a product of the term (z-a) and a non-vanishing function. 3) A function is identically zero on a connected domain if all of its derivatives are zero at one point in the domain. This implies zeroes of holomorphic functions are isolated.

Uploaded by

Joseph Chavoya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

LECTURE-19 : ZEROES OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

VED V. DATAR∗

A complex number a is called a zero of a holomorphic function f : Ω → C


if f (a) = 0. A basic fact is that zeroes of holomorphic functions are isolated.
This follows from the following theorem.
Theorem 0.1. Let f : Ω → C be a holomorphic function that is not identi-
cally zero, and let a ∈ Ω be a zero of f . Then there exists a disc D around
a, a non vanishing holomorphic function g : D → C (that is, g(z) 6= 0 for
all z ∈ D), and a unique positive integer n such that
f (z) = (z − a)n g(z).
The positive integer n is called the order of the zero at a. The main
tool that we need in order to prove this is the strong principle of analytic
continuation.
Lemma 0.1. Let Ω ⊂ C be a connected domain, and f be holomorphic on
Ω. If there is a p ∈ Ω such that
f k (p) = 0
for all k = 0, 1, 2 · · · , then f (z) = 0 for all z ∈ Ω.
Proof. Let E ⊂ Ω defined by
E = {z ∈ Ω | f (n) (z) = 0, ∀ n = 0, 1, 2, · · · }.
Then by hypothesis p ∈ E, and hence E is non-empty. It is enough to show
that E = Ω. The proof is completed by proving three claims.
Claim 1. E is an open subset.
To see this, let a ∈ E. Since Ω is open, there exists a disc Dε (a) such
that Dε (a) ⊂ Ω. By analyticity, for any z ∈ Dε (a),

X
f (z) = an (z − a)n .
n=0

But then an = f (n) (a)/n!, and since a ∈ E this implies that an = 0 for
all n = 0, 1, 2, · · · . Hence f (z) = 0 for all z ∈ Dε (a), and in particular
f (n) (z) = 0 for all z ∈ Dε (a) and all n, and hence Dε (a) ⊂ E. That is, every
point in E has an open neighborhood which also belongs to E, which shows
that E is open.

Date: 24 August 2016.


1
Claim 2. E is closed in Ω. That is, if {zk } a sequence of points in E such
that
lim zk = a ∈ Ω,
k→∞
then a ∈ E.
We need to show that E contains all it’s limit points. Let a ∈ Ω be a
limit point of a sequence {zk } in E. Then for any n and k, f (n) (zk ) = 0.
Since f (n) is continuous, this implies that
f (n) (a) = lim f (n) (zk ) = 0,
k→∞
which in turn implies that a ∈ E. Hence E is closed in Ω.
Claim 3. E = Ω.
If not, then there is a q ∈ Ω \ E. Since Ω is connected, there exists a
continuous path γ : [0, 1] → Ω such that γ(0) = p and γ(1) = q. Let
T = sup {γ(t) ∈ E}.
t∈[0,1]

Then T is the first time that the curve leaves E. Since E is closed, γ(T ) ∈ E.
To see this, let tn → T − . Then since γ is continuous, γ(tn ) → γ(T ), and
hence γ(T ) ∈ Ω is a limit point for the sequence {γ(tn )}. Each point of the
sequence γ(tn ) belongs to E and since E is closed in Ω, this implies that
γ(T ) ∈ E. But now, E is also open. So there is a disc Dε (γ(T )) ⊂ E.
Since γ is continuous, γ −1 (Dε (γ(T ))), which contains T , is also open. In
particular, there is a t > T such that t ∈ γ −1 (Dε (γ(T ))) or equivalently
γ(t) ∈ Dε (γ(T )). So we have found a t > T such that γ(t) ∈ E which
contradicts the maximality of T and hence there can be no point q ∈ Ω \
E. 
Remark 0.1. For readers familiar with some point-set topology, the above
argument should be familiar. Namely, if Ω is a connected set, then the only
subsets that are both open and closed in Ω, are the empty set and Ω itself.
Proof of Theorem 0.1. By the lemma, if f is not identically zero, there
exists an n such that f (k) (a) = 0 for k = 0, 1, · · · , n − 1 but f (n) (a) 6= 0. Let
Dε (a) be a disc such that Dε (a) ⊂ Ω. Then f has a power series expansion
in the disc centered at z = a with the first n terms vanishing. So we write
f (z) = an (z − a)n + an+1 (z − a)n+1 + · · ·
with an 6= 0. The the theorem is proved with
g(z) = an + an+1 (z − a) + · · · .
As an immediate corollary to the theorem we have the following.
Corollary 0.1. Let f : Ω → C holomorphic.
(1) The set of zeroes of f is isolated. That is, for every zero a, there
exists a small disc Dε (a) centered at a such that f (z) 6= 0 for all
z ∈ Dε (a) \ {a}.
2
(2) (weak principle of analytic continuation) If Ω is connected, and f, g :
Ω → C are holomorphic such that for some open subset U ⊂ Ω,
f (z) = g(z),
for all z ∈ U , then
f (z) = g(z)
for all z ∈ Ω.
Proof. By the theorem, if a ∈ Ω is a root, then there exists a disc D around
a, and integer m, and a holomorphic function g : D → C such that g(a) 6= 0
and
f (z) = (z − a)m g(z).
Since g(a) 6= 0, by continuity, there is a small disc Dε (a) ⊂ D such that
g(z) 6= 0 for any z ∈ Dε (a). But then on this disc (z − a) is also not zero
anywhere except at a, and hence for any z ∈ Dε (a) \ {a}, f (z) 6= 0 exactly
what we wished to prove. Part (2) is a trivial consequence of the Lemma. 
Example 0.1. Even though the zeroes are isolated, they could converge to
the boundary. For instance, consider the holomorphic function
π 
f (z) = sin
z

on C . Clearly z = 1/n is a sequence of zeroes. They are isolated, but
converge to z = 0 which is not in the domain.

∗ Department of Mathematics, UC Berkeley


E-mail address: vvdatar@berkeley.edu

You might also like