0% found this document useful (0 votes)
590 views1 page

C2 Content Communicative Achievement Organisation Language

The document provides a 3-level assessment scale used to evaluate examiners for the C2 Proficiency Writing exam. At the highest level (Band 5), the response demonstrates complete command of the task, communicates complex ideas convincingly and fully informs the target reader. Organization is impressive and language use is sophisticated with few errors. Band 4 performances share qualities of Bands 3 and 5. Band 3 responses use conventions effectively, hold attention, and fully inform the reader, though minor issues may exist.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
590 views1 page

C2 Content Communicative Achievement Organisation Language

The document provides a 3-level assessment scale used to evaluate examiners for the C2 Proficiency Writing exam. At the highest level (Band 5), the response demonstrates complete command of the task, communicates complex ideas convincingly and fully informs the target reader. Organization is impressive and language use is sophisticated with few errors. Band 4 performances share qualities of Bands 3 and 5. Band 3 responses use conventions effectively, hold attention, and fully inform the reader, though minor issues may exist.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Paper 2

C2 Proficiency Writing Examiners use the following assessment scale, extracted from the one on the previous page:

Communicative
C2 Content Organisation Language
Achievement

Demonstrates complete
command of the conventions Uses a wide range of vocabulary,
Text is organised
of the communicative task. including less common lexis, with
All content is impressively and
fluency, precision, sophistication and
relevant to the task. Communicates complex coherently using a wide
style.
5 ideas in an effective and range of cohesive devices
Target reader is fully and organisational Use of grammar is sophisticated, fully
convincing way, holding the
informed. patterns with complete controlled and completely natural.
target reader’s attention
with ease, fulfilling all flexibility.
Any inaccuracies occur only as slips.
communicative purposes.

4 Performance shares features of Bands 3 and 5.


Uses a range of vocabulary, including
Uses the conventions of less common lexis, effectively and
Minor irrelevances the communicative task precisely.
Text is a well-organised,
and/or omissions with sufficient flexibility to
coherent whole, using Uses a wide range of simple and
may be present. communicate complex ideas
3 a variety of cohesive complex grammatical forms with full
in an effective way, holding
Target reader is on devices and organisational control, flexibility and sophistication.
the target reader’s attention
the whole informed. patterns with flexibility.
with ease, fulfilling all Errors, if present, are related to less
communicative purposes. common words and structures, or occur
as slips.
2 Performance shares features of Bands 1 and 3.
Uses a range of vocabulary, including
Uses the conventions of
Irrelevances and less common lexis, appropriately.
the communicative task Text is well organised and
misinterpretation of effectively to hold the target coherent, using a variety Uses a range of simple and complex
1 task may be present. reader’s attention and of cohesive devices and grammatical forms with control and
Target reader is communicate straightforward organisational patterns to flexibility.
minimally informed. and complex ideas, as generally good effect.
Occasional errors may be present but
appropriate.
do not impede communication.
Content is totally
irrelevant.
0 Performance below Band 1.
Target reader is not
informed.

Writing Assessment 27

You might also like