Mining Industry and Sustainable Development: Time For Change
Mining Industry and Sustainable Development: Time For Change
Fernando P. Carvalho
Abstract
Mining industries provide most of the materials we rely on to build infrastructures and instruments of daily use, to obtain
large amounts of energy, and to supply agriculture with fertilizers that enable most of foods produced. At the same time,
mining is the human activity that has been more disturbing to environment and is linked to large social impacts and
inequalities. Notwithstanding, our future is deeply depending on mining. Several mining sectors, from phosphate to
uranium, are reviewed and their current impacts and challenges are discussed. The mining legacy and environmental
remediation, the present mining and challenges, and the future mining and society are discussed in relationship with
environmental health and sustainable development. It is concluded that current mining practices need to change and
contribute to community development with more equity, and to protect better natural resources and ecosystems in order to
be environmentally acceptable and compliant with sustainable development objectives.
Introduction
Mining industries provide many of the raw materials for equipment we use daily, from aluminum cans up to electronic chips of
cell phones and computers. To arrive here, metal mining steadily increased over the centuries, with occasional “rushes” for
several minerals (silver, gold, radium, etc.) which occurred in connection with booms in demand. The common mining practice
until very recently could be summarized in a few steps: from obtaining a license, dig the ore, sell the metal, and, once the
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 1/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
deposit was exhausted, walk‐away and start another mine elsewhere (Jain et al. 2016; EB 2017). Not surprisingly, mining is
among the human activities with widest environmental and social impacts.
Herein, several mining sectors are revisited to highlight mining procedures, their e ects, and current challenges. Mining for
base metals (e.g. Al, Fe, Mn, and Ni) and energy fuels (oil, gas, coal, and uranium) requires large investments, and it is capital
intensive, being carried out mostly by major corporate companies. However, precious metals (e.g. Au, Ag, and Ta) in many
regions are often targeted by artisanal mining also. All have deep environmental impacts. The legacy of radium and uranium
mines in Europe is used to illustrate old mining practices, their environmental and social impacts, and remediation costs. New
mining projects are expected today to incorporate lessons from past mining activities and meet societal and development
needs in a more e cient and less damaging way to the environment.
This article summarizes how important have been past mining activities and how important can be in the future, at least for
some types of mining, and discusses the e ects of mining, the trends in mining impacts on environment and society, and how
they shall avoid compromising sustainable development.
The comparative importance of mining and contribution to the world Gross Domestic Product (GDP) during the last century
shows an increase by a factor of 27 in ores and minerals production, and by a factor of 8 in total materials extraction, while GDP
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 2/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
raised 23‐fold (Fig. 1). A clear rst role of mining in the global average economic growth is highlighted in this assessment (UNEP,
2011).
Figure 1
Mining activities are very diverse and may have di erent ecological footprints. Past mining activities left such imprints in the
environment, but two issues in particular are of major and worldwide importance: mine tailings and acid mine drainage.
Tailings in general are voluminous and contain toxic elements that may be released and introduced in the biogeosphere
(Nordstrom 2011; Jain et al. 2016). Acid mine drainage often results from exposure of rock minerals and ore deposits to water
and oxygen facilitating the mobilization of chemical elements and increasing their concentrations in waters and food chains,
with detrimental e ects on ecosystems’ health and human health (Carvalho et al. 2007, 2016a,b; Hudson‐Edwards et al. 2011;
Nordstrom 2011). This mining legacy was accumulated over centuries but only in the last quarter of the 20th century its
environmental and human health impacts were nally recognized. Since then, there has been a signi cant development of
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 3/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
legislation for environmental and sanitary protection, and some actions were started to deal with industrial legacy through
clean up, remediation, and rehabilitation projects. These remediation actions started in USA with the Superfund project in 1980
and so far have been implemented mainly in North America and West Europe (Mudroch et al. 2002; EPA, 2017).
As a side e ect of environmental legislation development and increased costs of waste management, mining moved from
developed countries to other regions. Today, international companies often mine for oil, coal, gas, uranium, rare earth
elements, and ne metals in regions far from the big consumer markets and nal users. Mining regions are now often located
in remote areas of north of Canada and Australia, and in developing countries in South America, Asia, and Africa, often with less
stringent mining laws and weaker environmental regulations (Miranda et al. 1998; World Bank, 2002, 2017a). Mining impacts,
including waste streams and social impacts, were, therefore, generally transferred from developed and densely inhabited
regions to other regions.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 4/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 2
Other metals, such as uranium, and fossil fuels, such as oil and gas, are extracted for energy supply and are largely or totally
consumed in their applications (burned), and thus, the recycling does not apply as above (although, in the case of nuclear spent
fuel, reprocessing may still recover unused uranium). In both base metals and fuels, the resources in Earth are nite, although a
di erence between them may be that for some metals (base metals), we may live with a portion of the Earth crust resource,
while with others (energy minerals and fossil fuels) the trend is to use them until the Earth crust deposits (reserves) are
completely exhausted. If consumption continues as today, the limited amount of energy fuels in geological deposits will be
exhausted, and this may compromise growth and development at some point in future time (Gordon et al. 2006; Brown 2011).
Environmental and social‐economic impacts of mining may also vary with the ores and regions. Next, we review brie y a few
mining sectors to highlight trends and impacts as well as current challenges.
Base metals
This includes copper, nickel, iron, manganese, zinc, and others, but iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) occupy a leading role in
consumption and represent the largest fraction of metals accumulated in the society. Iron has been mined since antiquity, and
there are vast iron amounts in built infrastructures. Aluminum has been produced only from the 19th century on but today
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 5/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
occupies a wide place in the economy and industry (UNEP, 2013; USGS, 2017a,b). To illustrate this, we may look into statistics of
the global extraction of major metals which, in the period from 1970 to 2004 (35‐year period), grew by more than 75%, and
global extraction of industrial minerals (e.g. rocks, cement), which increased by 53% in the same period (USGS, 2008). In such
period, global consumption of aluminum increased from about 12.5 billion tons per year to 38 billion tons per year, that is,
more than three times, while the global consumption of ferrous metals (used for production of steel) increased slower reaching
about one billion tons per year in 2014, that is, the double of 1974. In USA, aluminum recovered from old scrap in 2016 was
equivalent to about 31% of apparent consumption in the same year (USGS, 2017a).
Over the last decades, releases of materials into the environment, which take place in every stage from extraction, to use, and
to waste disposal causing environmental and human health impacts, increased at a greater rate because of overburden
removed to reach the metal ores. The quantity of waste generated to produce the 12 major metals and commodities was
computed to be, in average, four times the weight of the metals extracted, but, in reality, the wastes ow increases faster than
the commodity extraction due to declining ore grades and need to tap deeper ore deposits (USGS, 2008; UNEP, 2011).
Global trends in iron and steel consumption show also higher consumption of metals in North America, European Union, China,
and India than extraction which relates to economic growth of these countries. The opposite trend was noticed in the rest of
the world (USGS, 2008). It is also known that reserves of these metals (e.g. Fe is 5% of Earth crust) largely exceed the amounts
already extracted and will ensure the availability of these resources for long time (USGS, 2017a,b). This is not the case for all
metals and metal recycling is needed (Gordon et al. 2006). Recycling is easy for not‐alloyed metals, and it is much less costly in
energy than extraction from the mine and can extend further the life time of the resource (UNEP, 2013).
The extraction cost of base metals is large and its extraction usually requires intensive investment, the buildup of large
infrastructures, and generally produces large environmental impacts (Fig. 3). As an example, we may quote the 10 biggest iron
mines in the world and their environmental impacts (Basov 2015). Furthermore, the development of mines such as copper,
lead, and arsenic mines in Peru has caused severe environmental losses, and today, it may require intensive dialog with
stakeholders to reach a societal agreement to mining, as it happened at Cajamarca and Las Bambas (Bury 2002, 2004). It is also
from some of the biggest metal mines in Peru that reports give account of poor safety records and large social and
environmental impacts changing the livelihoods of communities and compromising water resources and agriculture soils
(Ponce and McClintock 2014; Triscritti 2013; Bebbington and Williams 2008; Jaskoski 2014; Fig. 4).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 6/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 3
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 7/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 4
The current global trends in production of these metals are worrisome: (1) in spite of rising material ows, the worldwide
average commodity consumption per capita did not improve globally, but regionally only; (2) the environmental costs with
extraction and processing were increasingly borne by lesser developed countries; (3) these combined trends create a situation
not sustainable in the long term (USGS, 2008). Why is this? Because metal extraction to satisfy the needs of the world
population at the standards enjoyed by most developed countries with current technology would exhaust metal resources at
least for several among them, such as copper, zinc, and platinum (Gordon et al. 2006).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 8/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
This mining sector is the world largest in the amount of materials produced and the value of revenues (UNEP, 2011). Access to
energy sources and their use constrained and shaped the human society's actions and economic growth over time, and this is
particularly true for oil and natural gas during the 20th century. Oil exploitation fully developed during the last century and
related ecological impacts occurred, ranging from oil spills and soil contamination in the forests of Ecuador and delta of Niger
River to the Arctic coast and oil spills in the sea, such as the recent oil spill of the Deep Horizon platform in Gulf of Mexico, 2010
(Chang et al. 2014).
In the Gulf of Mexico, only there are more than 2000 oil platforms in operation and other oil spills had occurred, and are likely
to occur again. Also, oil tankers su ered shipwrecks in seas around the world that originated oil spills with signi cant impacts in
coastal areas (e.g. Torrey Canyon, Exon Valdez, and Prestige). The most iconic case of impact in the marine environment was the
oil spill of the supertanker Torrey Canyon in 1967 at the Cornwall coast, English channel, exactly 50 years ago, that initiated a
period of wide concern with ecological disasters (Wells 2017). Scienti c reports have documented the toxic e ects of crude oil
on biota including humans, the lasting contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons, and the slow recovery of marine ecosystems
(Chang et al. 2014). Reports from several countries have highlighted also serious impacts on terrestrial environments, human
communities, and economics. Impacts of Deep Horizon 2010 oil spill cost 62 billion USD to British Petroleum (USA Today, 2016),
and the cost of oil spills following shipwreck of oil tankers, such as the Prestige at the Spanish and Portuguese coasts in 2002,
were estimated in billion dollars (Loureiro et al. 2009; Chang et al. 2014; Fig. 5). Oil spills showed also the diversity of toxic
pathways and ecological impacts of crude oil and how unprepared the nations are to face such ecological catastrophes (Chang
et al. 2014).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 9/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 5
Needless to say, that in spite of oil spill impacts, most countries depend on oil and natural gas supplies and its production is an
ongoing activity. Many estimates have been made of the oil and gas reserves and, repeatedly, new oil and gas elds were
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 10/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
discovered, and the expected lifetime of resources has been expanded. Eventually, they may last for another 50 years to 5
centuries, depending on estimates. Nevertheless, although known with some uncertainty, there is a wide conscience that fossil
fuels do exist in nite amounts and campaigns for the best use of resources and energy savings have been introduced
worldwide to constrain also the fast release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Other impacts associated to oil and gas production are the disposal of scales from pipe cleaning, which generally are highly
radioactive, and of sands associated with bottom of oil reservoirs which contain metals and radionuclides in high
concentrations as well. For example, scales from oil pipes contain radium‐226 (226Ra) in concentrations above 1000 Bq/g, and
other radionuclides are present as well. For comparison, the IAEA classi es materials as radioactive waste when radionuclide
activity concentrations exceed 1 Bq/g (EU, 1997). This requires careful waste management and waste disposal by oil companies
although, often, the regions where oil production is on‐going are not prepared or not aware of this radioactive waste. Despite
currently available knowledge, still the environmental impacts of oil and gas exploration are very high, often not fully regulated
and controlled and, if waste is not properly managed, the e ects may last for thousands of years (e.g. 226Ra radioactive half‐life
is 1600 years). Their environmental impact and potential impact on human health may thus last much longer than the resource.
Fossil fuel resources are consumed at high rates, and there is no hope that biogeochemical cycle and natural processes will
replenish the fossil fuel reservoirs in Earth in a time scale useful to human societies. Therefore, other energy sources will be
needed and must be sought (Brown 2011; Michaelides 2012). Interestingly, it has been questioned how the access and use of
energy sources (fossil in particular) could have been key to development of successful human societies. It is a matter of
consensus that the access to energy sources, such as coal in the Industrial Revolution, was instrumental to enhanced growth.
However, plotting the Human Development Index against the annual average energy consumption per capita clearly shows that
there are no quality of life gains above a certain energy consumption level (Smil 2004). The only guaranteed outcome of higher
energy use is greater environmental burdens which may endanger habitability of the biosphere. Indeed, today there is scienti c
agreement that oil and gas, together with coal burning, have a major environmental foot print and are responsible for
increased concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide and accelerated climate changes (IPCC, 2014; IEA, 2017).
Coal
Coal has been used as a fuel for thousand years, but really become the most important fuel with the Industrial Revolution and
the steam powered engines (Freese 2004). In the 19th and 20th centuries, coal was the primary source of energy in metal
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 11/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
smelting and to produce electricity, and it was extracted in many countries, from United Kingdom to Australia and from United
States of America to Russia. In 1980 in the United Kingdom, coal was replaced by the cheaper and abundant natural gas and oil
and this was the end of an era. Today, coal still accounts for the production of near to 25% of the world's energy, but is
declining fast, and by 2050, coal will contribute to about one‐third only (IEA, 2017). There are an estimated 892 billion tonnes of
proven coal reserves worldwide. This means that, according to the World Coal Association, there is enough coal to last us
around 110 years at current rates of consumption. In contrast, according to some estimates, the proven oil and gas reserves are
equivalent to around 52 and 54 years, respectively, at current production levels (World Coal Association, 2017). Safety in coal
mining is a very urgent issue as it is estimated that around 500 coal miners die every year in mine accidents in China only
(World Bank, 2007).
Environmental impacts of coal burning include increased amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, that together with
other greenhouse gases, such as nitrogen protoxide (N2O) and methane (CH4), are the causes for present global warming (IPCC
2014). The evidence of climate change and its potential e ects led to international negotiations on reduction of carbon
emissions and creation of a carbon market (IEA, 2017). Notwithstanding, coal still is a lever for the economic growth of many
countries (e.g. electricity production and steel making), while others currently decrease coal burning because of atmospheric
and global impacts. Besides global impacts, countries that consume very large amounts of coal, such as China, have to deal with
the heavy environmental and public health e ects from coal mining and coal burning (World Bank, 2007; IEA, 2017).
Less known than CO2 emissions, but well documented too, are soot and particle emissions into the atmosphere as well as the
release of radioactive elements volatilized and injected into the atmosphere (UNSCEAR, 2017). The radionuclides emitted from
fossil fuels burning are the primordial radionuclides of uranium, thorium, and actinium radioactive series. These include alpha‐,
beta‐, and gamma‐emitting radionuclides that become constituents of ue gas and particle emissions into the atmosphere.
Several among these radionuclides, such as 226Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po have been reported in aerosols from coal powered plants
(UNSCEAR, 2017). Energy agencies have made comparisons of CO2 and radioactive emissions from coal power plants and from
nuclear power plants and concluded that nuclear power plants in normal operation have lower CO2 emissions and less
radioactive emissions into the environment than coal power plants and, thus, have lesser contributions to climate change and
to radiation exposure (UNSCEAR, 2017). However, releases of radioactivity that occurred with major nuclear accidents (e.g.
Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima) outweighed radioactivity released by coal power plants. Furthermore, several reports
indicate that release of smoke and gas from fossil fuel and biomass burning may indeed increase the radioactivity exposure of
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 12/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
human population through inhalation, and this issue might have been neglected in the past (Yan et al. 2012; Carvalho et al.
2014a).
Phosphate
Phosphate industry is crucial to agriculture and food production. Phosphate production grew over the past century and
continues to increase in order to supply fertilizers to agriculture and enable high yields in food production (Carvalho 2017).
From phosphate rock produced annually, most is converted into phosphoric acid and, from this, 82% is used in fertilizer, 9% in
animal feed and beverages, and 9% into nonfood industrial production (e.g. detergents) (Heckenmüller et al. 2014).
Phosphate sedimentary rocks contain uorapatite with phosphor (P) and calcium (Ca), but also uor (F), cadmium (Cd), arsenic
(As), mercury (Hg), and uranium (U). While P and Ca are essential elements to plant growth, and thus important elements in
agriculture fertilizers, metals such as As, Cd, and U are undesired elements and may contaminate crops and soils.
Many of the co‐occurring metals in phosphate rock are partly retained with phosphogypsum, a by‐product of phosphoric acid
production, while other part goes with the fertilizer (Carvalho 1995). Due to radionuclides and other contaminants,
phosphogypsum stacks have found no meaningful application. Phosphate fertilizers are often criticized also because of
contaminants they contain. In the future, it is likely that phosphate fertilizers will be puri ed, a step likely to be driven mainly by
uranium recuperation, and henceforward phosphate fertilizers will not add further amounts of Cd and U and other
contaminants to soils.
During last century, phosphate fertilizers were overused in some regions, and this increased the P content in soils in Europe
and North America and now in China. This P excess ends up in aquatic environments causing eutrophication and representing
also a loss of P for agriculture (Scholz et al. 2013). Meanwhile, the piles of phosphogypsum amount to about 3 × 109 tons
worldwide, and this industrial legacy is often seen as a source of environmental contaminants. Most of the phosphogypsum
disposal sites were not remediated and attempts have been made to reuse this material, for example, as soil amendment and
in construction materials, but generally with limited success. One solution currently pushed by phosphate industry (to disperse
the phosphogypsum in soils in order to get rid of stacks) is not desirable because this would spread contaminants in soils and
waters and would prevent the eventual recover of uranium from phosphogypsum (Fig. 6).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 13/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 6
The main phosphate producers are USA, China, and Morocco, and the largest world phosphate reserves exist in the West
Sahara. A debate about limited resources of phosphate and possible scarcity of phosphor to agriculture has been raging since
the last decade (Cordell et al. 2009; Gilbert 2009; Van Vuuren et al. 2010). Some authors claim that phosphate production
attained already the peak production and resources will be exhausted in about one century and then shortage in food
production is inevitable. Others argue that with the current consumption rates, phosphorus resources may last several
centuries (Vaccari 2009; Rosemarin 2010).
Currently, we are using more P in a short time and faster than nature can redistribute it, and the obvious advice is that
phosphorus must be better used in current practices. However, phosphor recycling is feasible, and this may a ord additional
time to resource availability. For example, P may be recuperated and recycled from wastewater, animal metabolism, and
aquatic environments in order to maintain food production yields in agriculture (Schnug and De Kok 2016). Therefore, contrarily
to predictions of phosphor scarcity it seems very unlikely that phosphor may become a limiting factor in food production
(Scholz et al. 2013; Heckenmüller et al. 2014). Regionally, it may be needed to intervene in the biogeochemical cycle of phosphor
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 14/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
in order to redistribute this element and make phosphor available according to soil and food production needs. Globally, due to
the uneven geographic distribution of phosphate deposits, it may become a reason for future geostrategic dispute, as the fossil
energy sources today.
The largest resources of REE are in China that is also the largest consumer of REE (Lima and Filho 2015). Outside China, most
REE mines exploit littoral sand dune deposits (monazite sands) in African coasts, South Asia, and Australia. Coastal areas of
Bangladesh, India, Mozambique, Senegal, currently have heavy minerals sand mining and much larger projects are now in the
process of approval and implementation in Africa (Fig. 7).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 15/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 7
Extraction of heavy minerals from sand dunes is carried out by wet sieving and gravimetric separation. Large barges, oating on
a dynamic fresh water pool, move along the dunes and revolve the sand. The sand fraction with no value (silica, hematite,
carbonates) is returned to the beach in the rear of extracting barges. The wet mineral concentrate is further processed to
segregate the heavier minerals using gravimetric and magnetic procedures. The outcome of the exploitation is to export heavy
mineral fractions (zircon, garnet, ilmenite) to metallurgical facilities able to achieve full metals’ separation.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 16/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
In the eld, this mining process conduces to destruction of consolidated sand dune barriers otherwise able to stop hurricanes
and prevent coastal erosion and, also, a ording protection to back dune ecosystems and stabilized coastal ecosystems. If
appropriate regulations and measures are not enforced, the agriculture, sheries, and tourism assets of such coastal areas may
be jeopardized (Carvalho et al. 2017).
Recent reports claimed that heavy mineral sands exploitations may cause radioactive contamination of the environment also
(Schüler et al. 2011). Heavy REE minerals in sand deposits usually are associated with uranium and thorium, and segregation of
zirconium and REE increase the concentration of those naturally occurring radionuclides in the material fractions produced. For
example, in a eld investigation carried out in Mozambique, uranium (238U) concentration in unprocessed sand from the top of
sand dunes was about 9 ± 1 Bq/kg, and in the nal zirconium produced, the 238U concentration was about 2700 ± 80 Bq/kg
(Carvalho et al. 2017). The ambient radiation dose on the top of natural sand dunes was about 0.08 μSv/h, while in the
processing plant facility, it averaged 1.5 μSv/h, and after minerals segregation by the piles of ilmenite, it was about 7.8 μSv/h. For
plant workers, spending 2000 h a year in the facilities and exposed to the average dose rate of 1.5 μSv/h, the accumulated
radiation dose from external radiation can attain 3 mSv/year, and up to 15.5 mSv/year by the ilmenite piles, thus well above the
radiation dose limit of 1 mSv/year (excluding contribution from the natural radiation background; IAEA, 2014). These results
con rmed the enhanced concentrations of radionuclides associated with the heavy minerals in coastal sands and that its
exploitation may originate occupational radiation exposure, but no environmental radioactive contamination was reported
(Carvalho et al. 2014b, 2017).
As these heavy mineral sands mining is expanding very rapidly, the development of conservation strategies for coastal areas
concerned must become a priority, as well as the enforcement of regulations for radiation protection of workers and members
of the public in relationship with the extraction and handling of these naturally occurring radioactive minerals.
Shale gas
Shale gas produced by hydraulic fracturing or “hydrofracking” is a new type of natural gas and oil mining industry that
developed recently, mostly from the year 2000 in USA (U.S. EPA, 2016). This extraction procedure is generating enthusiasm in
other regions, including Europe. In this process, deep boreholes are made in the Earth crust and water with sand grains, or
zirconium, surfactants, and uidi er/emulsion agents are injected with high pressure in the productive rock layers underneath,
usually shale. The high‐pressure injection of water and sand breaks the shale layers opening ssures that facilitate the escape
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 17/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
of natural gas (gaseous hydrocarbons including methane, propane, etc.) from the rock matrix, rendering possible to pump them
to the surface (Fig. 8).
Figure 8
Current “hydrofracking” technology, tapping hydrocarbon resources relevant to the economy, allowed the USA to increase
natural gas production and replace coal by natural gas. Burning natural gas for electricity generation is expected to improve air
quality and decrease greenhouse e ects derived from coal burning. However, hydraulic fracturing does not meet
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 18/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
“spontaneously” the safety requirements for water protection and radiation protection and got no public acceptance (Jackson
et al. 2014). Thousands of wells for natural gas production have been drilled in several regions of USA. Reports highlighted also
that areas of “hydrofracking” are a ected also by frequent earthquakes due to stress redistribution.
Hydraulic fracturing releases also large amounts of radon (222Rn), the radioactive gas formed from radioactive decay of
naturally occurring 226Ra, often present in high concentrations in shale (Fig. 8). Reports, including a technical report made
available by the New York Times, indicate very high radioactive water from the wells discharged into rivers and containing
radium and radon concentrations at thousands of Bq/L and thus signi cantly exceeding safety standards (NYT, 2011).
Furthermore, aquifers become contaminated with the injected materials (U.S. EPA 2016). The chemical and radioactive impacts
of shale gas production seem very high, and contamination of aquifers currently is a major issue (U.S. EPA 2016). A recent
evaluation of the hydraulic fracturing impacts on water quality and quantity in USA has compiled records of a number of
impacts, although the scienti c evidence was considered insu cient for a nal assessment at national level (U.S. EPA 2016).
The collateral e ects of this mining procedure underline what was known from long time: mining may be very valuable but
often brings to surface and put in contact with biosphere elevated concentrations of naturally occurring elements that might be
toxic to life. Introduction of new techniques requires precaution in its use and maturation of techniques. The precautionary
principle should be applied.
Uranium
Uranium mining taps radioactive ores that are of interest to industrialized countries as fuel for electricity generating nuclear
industry (IAEA and NEA/OECD, 2016). As it happens with other energy commodities, the geographic distribution of uranium
deposits and uranium consumers does not coincide, and the extracted uranium is traded and transported worldwide. Uranium
world reserves were estimated at about 5.7 Mtonnes and at current rates of consumption for a universe of about 450 nuclear
reactors used for electricity generation, with current technology and a current usage of about 63,000 tonnesU/yr, reserves
could last about 90 years. This represents a higher level of assured resources than is normal for most minerals (WNA, 2017).
Uranium mining is, indeed, a rst stage in a set of uranium‐related industries, globally designated as nuclear fuel cycle, aiming
to prepare suitable fuel for the nuclear industry (Fig. 9). Those industries are spread over a number of countries (Hore‐Lacy
2016).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 19/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 9
Generally, the uranium ore extracted from the mine is processed by an associated mill order to obtain yellow cake (uranium
oxide) for export (Fig. 10). This mining and milling stage generates signi cant amounts of mining waste and radioactive waste
tailings, where most of the radioactivity of uranium ore due to uranium radioactive daughters will remain. These uranium
tailings create environmental impacts and long‐term issues that need careful consideration (IAEA, 2005, 2006; Carvalho 2011).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 20/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 10
Most of uranium mining and milling legacy sites worldwide, even taking a look only into short‐term radioactive exposure, were
not in line with current radiological protection Safety Standards developed by the IAEA and applied internationally for
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 21/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
protection of workers, members of the public, and the environment (IAEA, 2014). Environmental impacts of past radium and
uranium sites have been assessed in several countries. For example, in USA, Germany, France, and Portugal, it was concluded
that tailings and acid mine drainage were sources of radioactive contaminants enhancing environmental radioactivity in water,
soils, and agriculture products (IAEA, 2005; Merkel and Arab (2015); Carvalho et al. 2014b, 2016a,b). Environmental remediation
projects were implemented and many of these former uranium sites went through clean up and remediation measures which
include relocation of waste piles, coverage of solid waste, and treatment of radioactive water and even replacement of water
supplies in contaminated areas with noncontaminated water brought from elsewhere. Environmental remediation of these
legacy areas is a costly process and in general has been paid from public funds (Fig. 11).
Figure 11
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 22/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Public concerns with the safety of nuclear power plants (NPPs), especially after the nuclear accidents of Chernobyl and
Fukushima, question the future of nuclear energy and several countries decided to move away from nuclear energy and bet on
renewables (e.g. Germany), although renewables may also have signi cant life‐cycle impacts and carbon emissions and require
mining for the necessary raw materials, for example, REE and fertilizers. Other countries (e.g. China) do have NPPs in
construction. A number of countries in Africa and central Asia expressed also interest in nuclear energy and are currently
planning to initiate uranium mining as well.
It is possible to extract and produce uranium applying occupational safety standards that ensure radiation protection of
workers and environment (IAEA, 2014). The current big challenge to uranium mining companies is to organize mining and
milling in a way that the radiation safety and environmental protection, including after mine remediation, are included in the
commodity prices, and to avoid contaminated legacy sites.
Artisanal mining
Artisanal mining is the nonindustrial mining activity, generally carried out illegally by large number of people who extract and
sell small amounts of a mineral to survive to poverty. Artisanal and small‐scale mining occur in approximately 80 countries. It is
widespread in developing countries in Africa, Asia, Oceania, and Central and South America, and it ensures the existence for
millions of families in rural areas of developing countries. Globally, about 100 million people – workers and their families –
depend on artisanal mining compared to about 7 million people worldwide engaged in industrial mining (World Bank, 2017a,b).
Artisanal gold mining in Africa is mostly an illegal activity, and tons of gold are produced and traded without paying taxes.
Artisanal gold mining is estimated to produce some 330 tonnes of gold per year or 12% of o cial world production (Artisanal
Gold Council). Governments oscillate between repressing artisanal mining and regulating this activity through buying the gold
from artisanal miners (World Bank, 2009). The artisanal gold mining in Africa raises several serious social problems, such as
child labor, poor safety and high number of accidents, substance addiction, and high criminality in gold mining areas.
International organizations and the International Gold Council try to minimize such problems through several initiatives
(http://www.artisanalgold.org/; Fig. 12).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 23/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Figure 12
In gold mining, two main processes, one based on mercury and the other based on cyanide, are used to aggregate gold dust
after its segregation from the placer deposit or from the ore‐bearing rock. These processes are very toxic to the artisanal
community and to the environment, in particular, to rivers where all the chemical waste is dumped (e.g. Amazon River). Reports
on the contamination by mercury have described the situation in Ecuador, Amazon forest, and in several African countries
(Miranda et al., 1998). The use of large amounts of mercury and its volatilization release mercury into the atmosphere and also
into soils and water. Mercury enters the food chain and it is transferred to humans. Today mercury is considered a global
pollutant and a threat to human health and the environmental, and health costs are high. Initiatives to assist diminishing the
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 24/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
use of toxic chemicals have been implemented by several organizations but with mitigated results yet
(http://www.artisanalgold.org/).
Artisanal mining is growing also now in the sector of REE and tantalum extraction, particularly in Africa (Fig. 13, REE artisanal
mining). Miners segregate heavy minerals from sands and ore deposits to produce coltan (columbite and tantalite mineral) and
tantalite, and stock at home sometimes signi cant quantities of these minerals. Because these contain also uranium and
thorium series radionuclides, miners and their families expose themselves to signi cant radiation doses (Carvalho et al. 2014b).
No initiative is addressing this issue yet, despite the obvious safety risk for the populations and the environmental impact of
such activities.
Figure 13
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 25/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
In very recent years, the development of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures aiming at identifying the potential
e ects and damages caused by developments in the environment and society are helping to foresee and estimate gains, costs,
losses, and consequences of such projects (Jain et al. 2016). Variations of EIA have been developed such as the Strategic
Environmental Impact Assessment (SEIA) to help evaluating and planning beyond the narrow scope of one project and even the
Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment (REIA) for projects involving radioactive materials, such as an uranium mine or a
nuclear facility.
One key aspect in all mining projects is the risk assessment of mine operations to surrounding human settlements. In the past,
in European countries for example, it was common to see mines and cities and their activities entangled in a small territory.
This has been the case, for example, of the Ruhr basin in Germany, Loire in France, and West Midlands (Birmingham) in UK, to
cite just a few very old mining regions. In recent years, the regulations and concerns with environmental resources lead to
mitigation of pollution and remediation of the environmental impact. One good example is the Erzgebirge (Ore Mountains) in
Saxony, Germany, near the border with Czech Republic, where rst silver and associated base metals and later uranium was
extracted to supply the URSS nuclear program. With Germany reuni cation, in 1991 started a large environmental remediation
program that involved clean‐up of contaminated areas, radioactive waste con nement, installation of mine water treatment
plants, and rebuilding the landscape and villages. The state‐owned former mining company Wismut GmbH has been
implementing this work (http://www.wismut.de/en/). Remediation was needed because the exposure of large human
communities to radiation and radioactive waste is not acceptable according to current radiation protection standards (IAEA,
2014). Similar scenarios of exposure to harmful contaminants (uranium or other metals) exist in many regions including west
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 26/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Europe where, due to dense occupation of territory and miners’ settlements near the former mines, almost every mine has
villages or cities nearby (IAEA, 2005; NEA/OECD, 2014).
In some regions, the cost of environmental remediation of mining legacies has been high and paid by public funds because the
former mining companies do not exist any longer. For example, the environmental remediation cost of the Saxony areas in
Germany amounts already to 65 billion Euros, the cost of remediation abandoned mine sites in Portugal is of 139 million Euros,
and the project to relocate and con ne the uranium mining waste in Colorado (MOAB project) is budgeted at 1 billion dollars
(NEA/OECD, 2014). The value of a healthy environment and control of soil, air, and water quality justi es the cost of these
environmental remediation works and recuperation of contaminated areas (Fig. 14).
Figure 14
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 27/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Remediation of legacy uranium tailings (Urgeiriça Mine, Portugal) placing a cap of geotextile membrane and several soil layers to con ne radioactive uranium mill
tailings.
With the move of mining activities to other continents and remote areas, some unforeseen exposures did occur. For example,
uranium mining in Niger started in the Sahara desert where no settlements existed and mining companies built the mining
infrastructure from scratch. Because it was the desert, there was no population critical group to protect and, in the absence of
water in the surface, mining impact was foreseen as minimal. However, in a short time, the access to water from the wells
drilled by the mine and the opportunity to recycle scrap materials (metal, timber, plastic) attracted people. Rapidly a city grew
around the mine site, counting today 80 000 inhabitants. Agriculture, using wastewater from the mines developed also to
supply vegetables and fruits to the miner's families, and this way a large potentially exposed critical group was born in the
desert. All these artisanal and agricultural activities created pathways for the transfer of radioactive contaminants and radiation
exposure of population, requiring measures to reduce exposure to radioactivity.
Mining outside Africa, for example, in Indonesia, China, and Peru, has also developed in situations of elevated risk to humans
and the environment, with large mines surrounded by cities where conventional safety and prevention of contamination and
exposure to toxic metals was not ensured (Fig. 4).
The main lessons to learn here are the need to cope with uranium mining legacy and to keep risk assessment methodologies
open to review and improvement, especially when facing the unusual. May be the next opportunity with a strong need for
development of EIA and risk assessment methodologies will be the upcoming metal exploitation at and around hydrothermal
vents in the deep sea. Remediation of mining environmental impacts on these ecosystems might be nearly impossible at the
present. Enforcement of safety measures and regulations are thus needed as a critical step to protect the fragile ecosystems of
deep ocean.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 28/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
were not accounted for, for a long time. Until very recently, environmental impacts on nature and on populations at large were
not duly considered either.
With exhaustion of rich ore deposits and enforcement of environmental protection regulations, many mining companies moved
to developing regions where regulations were less strict. Implementation of large mining projects in developing countries
created many situations of vast wealth for a minority, while the large majority of the population has not seen improvement of
their socioeconomic status and welfare. To the contrary, the mining impacts often degraded their living conditions (Jaskoski
2014). Developing countries, the new hosts of mining projects, are adapting and modernizing their legislation to implement
environmental and public health protection measures.
From corporate viewpoint, a key aspect to the success of mining is to obtain, besides the o cial and legal mining permit, also
the social license from community, that is, their consent and adhesion to mining in their region. Corporate responsibility of
mining companies has developed also to share the wealth from mining with communities, and this has been achieved through
investment in building infrastructures for the region, such as schools and hospitals, and minimizing the impacts. The future for
mining is, therefore, dependent from adhering to good mining practices in order to preserve the environment everywhere and
also to take social responsibility in the development of the region and contributing to life quality of the community.
This was expressed in the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, 1992, where 27 Principles of Sustainable Development were
agreed by representatives of 172 Governments and 2400 nongovernmental organizations. Those principles fall into three key
areas, where cooperation and integration of technical and economic activities were agreed as necessary to ensure economic
growth, ecological protection of natural resources and environment, and social development including safety at workplaces and
community development.
In spite of such international agreements, the reality has been resilient to changes and the abundance of oil, gas, and mineral
resources is seen by many as a curse. The expression “resource curse” has been used to identify a process often observed that
natural resource wealth tends to adversely a ect a country's governance and has three main harmful e ects: tends to increase
corruption, make authoritarian regimes last longer, and trigger violent con icts (Ross 2015). Although there are natural
resources wealth countries that fail to reach their full potential, governments can make policy decisions that help avoid some of
the negative consequences of resources extraction and invest pro ts in social and economic development of the country.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 29/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
International endeavors, such as the Open Government Initiative (OGP) and Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI),
are voluntary initiatives that try to beat the “resource curse.”
Attempts have been made by international organizations to develop theoretical concepts to a ord growth decoupling from
resource mining and to decouple environmental impact from mining (UNEP, 2011). Notwithstanding, the main social impacts of
“resource curse” in Africa have been the complete disorganization of societies and food production, and war and con icts that
lead to migratory mass movements concerning nowadays 65.3 million individuals displaced from their homes
(http://www.unhcr.org/statistics/). The United Nations considered this a major humanitarian failure. However, mining and
agriculture could play a major role in community development and contributing to the welfare and stabilization of populations.
Mining is, thus, a vast eld of human activity that will go on to respond to societal needs, such as to xing and improving the
technosphere, but today with the additional responsibility that comes with knowledge: to make responsible management of the
resources and keep healthy ecosystems capable to support human society with life quality, today and in the future.
Current challenges posed to mining include remediation of legacy impacts, implementation of better protection of water
resources, and generally caring of environment and human health much better than in the past. Current and upcoming mining
projects need to coordinate with all stakeholders and achieve satisfactory legal and social approval to be successful. Local
communities, particularly in deprived and poor regions, want to share the wealth of mining and obtain from mining a positive
e ect in their lives.
Not every mine is a good example, but some mining projects have been able to achieve positive agreements with the
community and contribute to positive societal and environmental outcomes. This has been achieved, for example, through
allowing some degree of artisanal mining in the local community and buying the production from them; allowing recycling of
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 30/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
scrap from the mine; paying the community to work in re‐forestation and remediation e orts in parallel with mining activity;
and invest in capacity building of local community members. This coordination and share with stakeholders, although already
late for many places, is progressing and may allow for the improvement of mining, as we know it today.
Future mining is another thing. The enhanced valuation of environmental preservation and ecosystem services for ensuring
public health and life quality has pushed mining to become better performing than it was in the past. Nonetheless, mining
companies are seen today as ine cient and, due to volatilization of prices, the sector may resume e orts to cut production
costs dramatically (IBM, 2009). Very soon, metal and fuel mining will certainly introduce automation in all phases, from ore
drilling to ore chemical processing, thus reducing or even completely removing the miners from galleries, and other workers
from ore transportation and from chemical plants. This will reduce jobs o er in many developing countries – as in the past
happened in developed countries. Such move may increase the pro t of corporate companies, but the expectations of local
communities will remain intact as well as corporate responsibility towards them. Societal license from local communities to
mining activities will become harder to obtain. As an example, one may refer to the recent negotiations with local communities
around mining areas in Peru (Jaskoski 2014; Flor 2014).
To be successful, mining projects will need to nd better ways to link with local communities, may be through serious
participation in to social development, enhanced respect of human rights, and helping to overcome poverty. In Africa, for
example, mining could become part of the e ort to x populations running away from poverty and con icts in their home
countries.
Conclusions
New and current mining projects are expected to incorporate the lessons from past mining activities and thus solve their
detrimental colateral e ects on environment and public health. As these e ects often relate to contamination from tailings and
acid mine drainage produced during and after mining operations, the EIA of mining projects should encompass the entire life
cycle of the mine, should incorporate the assessment of negative impacts and societal bene ts also, and must incorporate the
liability and the cost – and thus make funding provisions timely – for postmine environmental rehabilitation.
Current mining activities need to reinforce procedures for protection of environment and public health, as it is today easier to
see that mining usually brings into the biosphere large amounts of nontargeted chemical elements often with toxic properties
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 31/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
to the environment and humans (e.g. radioelements and toxic metals) and previously neglected.
Mining laws and legal and technical capacity in many countries still need to be enhanced in order to include new internationally
recommended good mining practices (ALSF, 2017; AMLA, 2017). The good signs about this are that responsible mining
companies tend to adopt everywhere good mining procedures according to the best international standards, although this
might be far from being the general behavior yet. Some international initiatives, such as EITI, are important in this process.
Moreover, emerging technological developments allowing for intense automation (robotization) of many tasks, the entire
process of mining may deeply change very soon. Societal implications of automation will be vast and require advanced
foresight and planning to carry out mining in many regions of the world. Current developments of society values, in particular
the growing value ascribed to environment and life quality, makes unavoidable that future mining depends on achieving better
conservation of the environment, long‐term management of natural resources, and fair social‐economic impacts in the life of
local communities combined with improved safety in mining activities.
Mining activities shall be intertwined with sustainable development goals and ensure that present and future generations will
have resources or alternative means to satisfy their basic needs of food, water, and energy. This implies that metal recycling
must increase and alternative sources of energy must be tapped in order to decrease environmental impacts and depletion of
conventional energy resources. A component of internationally coordinated management of mineral resources exploitation
seems today needed to avoid jeopardy of nonrenewable resources and implement sustainable development at global scale.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
ALSF. 2017. The African Legal Support Facility. Available at http://alsf.afdb.org/who-we-are (accessed 15 March 2017).
Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 32/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Basov, V. 2015. True giants of mining: World's top 10 iron ore mines. Available at http://www.mining.com/author/vladimirbasov/
(accessed 1 March 2017).
Google Scholar
Bebbington, A., and M. Williams. 2008. Water and mining con icts in peru. Mt. Res. Dev. 28: 190– 195.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Brown, L. R. 2011. World on the edge: how to prevent environmental and economic collapse. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London. 240
pp.
Google Scholar
Bury, J. T. 2002. Livelihoods, mining and peasant protests in the Peruvian Andes. J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 1: 1– 19.
Crossref | Google Scholar
Bury, J. T. 2004. Livelihoods in transition: transnational gold mining operations and local change in Cajamarca, Peru”. Geogr. J. 170: 78– 91.
Wiley Online Library | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P. 1995. 210Pb and 210Po in sediments and suspended matter in the Tagus estuary, Portugal. Local enhancement of natural
levels by wastes from phosphate ore processing industry. Sci. Total Environ. 159: 201– 214.
Crossref | CAS | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P. 2011. Environmental radioactive impact associated to uranium production. Am. J. Environ Sci. 7: 547– 553.
Crossref | CAS | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P. 2017. Pesticides, environment and food safety. Food Energy Secur., 6: 48– 60.
Wiley Online Library | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 33/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Carvalho, F. P., and R. Edge. 2013. Uranium mining and milling: the need for reference materials in environmental radioactivity monitoring
programmes. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 70: 603– 610.
Crossref | CAS | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P., M. J. Madruga, M. C. Reis, J. G. Alves, J. M. Oliveira, J. Gouveia, et al. 2007. Radioactivity in the environment around past
radium and uranium mining sites of Portugal. J. Environ. Radioact. 96: 39– 46.
Crossref | CAS | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P., J. M. Oliveira, and M. Malta. 2014a. Exposure to radionuclides in smoke from vegetation res. Sci. Total Environ. 472: 421–
424.
Crossref | CAS | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P., F. M. Obete, S. Taimo, J. M. Oliveira, L. Silva, and M. Malta. 2014b. Radionuclides and radiation doses in heavy mineral sands
and other mining operations in Mozambique. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 158: 181– 186.
Crossref | CAS | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P., J. M. Oliveira, and M. Malta. 2016a. Radioactivity and water quality in areas of old uranium mines (Viseu, Portugal). Water Air
Soil Pollut. 227: 25.
Crossref | CAS | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P., J. M. Oliveira, and M. Malta. 2016b. Preliminary assessment of uranium mining legacy and environmental radioactivity
levels in Sabugal region, Portugal. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 7: 399– 408.
Crossref | CAS | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. P., F. Conceição, F. Catuane, S. Taímo, J. M. Oliveira, and M. Malta. 2017. Heavy mineral sands exploitation and exposure to
ionizing radiation in Mozambique. IAEA Proceedings of NORM VIII Conference heldin Rio de Janeiro, 2016. International Atomic Energy Agency,
Vienna (In press).
Google Scholar
Chang, S. E., J. Stone, K. Demes, and M. Piscitelli. 2014. Consequences of oil spills: a review and framework for informing planning. Ecol. Soc.
19: 26.
Crossref | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 34/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Cordell, D., J.‐O. Drangert, and S. White. 2009. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change 19:
292– 305.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
EB. 2017. Mining. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.. Available at
https://www.britannica.com/technology/mining (accessed 15 March 2017).
Google Scholar
EPA. 2017. Superfund Enforcement: 35 Years of Protecting Communities and the Environment. Available at
https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/superfund-enforcement-35-years-protecting-communities-and-environment (accessed 14 March
2017).
Google Scholar
EU. 1997. Current practice of dealing with natural radioactivity from oil and gas production in EU Member States. O ce for O cial Publications
of the European Communities, Luxembourg (ISBN 92‐828‐0599‐9).
Google Scholar
Fernandez‐Lozano, J., G. Gutierrez‐Alonsoa, and M. A. Fernandez‐Moran. 2015. Using airborne LiDAR sensing technology and aerial
orthoimages to unravel roman water supply systems and gold works in NW Spain (Eria valley, León). J. Archaeol. Sci. 53: 356– 373.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.003 .
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Flor, P. 2014. Mining and economic development in Peru. ReVista, Harvard Review of Latin America, Harvard University, Rockfeller Centre.
Available at http://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/book/mining-and-economic-development-peru
Google Scholar
Freese, B. 2004. Coal: a human history. Penguin Books, London. 137 pp.
Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 35/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Gordon, R. B., M. Bertram, and T. E. Graedel. 2006. Metal stocks and sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 1209– 1214.
Crossref | CAS | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Heckenmüller, M., D. Narita, and G. Klepper. 2014. Global availability of phosphorus and its implications for global food supply: an economic
overview. Kiel Working Paper No. 1897. Kiel Institute for Working Economy, Kiel, Germany.
Google Scholar
I. Hore‐Lacy, ed. 2016. Uranium for nuclear power. Ressources, mining and transformation to fuel. Elsevier, Woodhead Publishing,
Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
Hudson‐Edwards, K. A., H. E. Jamieson, and B. G. Lottermoser. 2011. Mine wastes: past, present, future. Elements 7: 375– 380.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
IAEA. 2005. Environmental Contamination from Uranium Production Facilities and their Remediation. Proceedings of an International
Workshop, Lisbon, 11–13 February 2004. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
Google Scholar
IAEA. 2006. Management of long term radiological liabilities: stewardship challenges. IAEA Technical Report Series Nr. 450. International
Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
Google Scholar
IAEA. 2014. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR
Part 3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
Google Scholar
IAEA and NEA/OECD. 2016. Uranium 2016: Resources, Production and Demand. A Joint Report by the Nuclear Energy Agency and the
International Atomic Energy Agency. Publication NEA No. 7301. Nuclear Energy Agency/Organization for Economic Co‐Operation and
Development, Paris.
Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 36/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
IBM. 2009. Envisioning the future of mining. IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA. IBM Global Services.
Google Scholar
IEA. 2017. World energy outlook 2016. International Energy Agency (OECD/IEA), Paris.
Google Scholar
IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Eds R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
Google Scholar
Jackson, R. B., A. Vengosh, J. W. Carey, R. J. Davies, T. H. Darrah, F. O'Sullivan, et al. 2014. The environmental costs and bene ts of fracking.
Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39: 327– 362.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Jain, R., Z. C. Cui, and J. K. Domen. 2016. Environmental impact of mining and mineral processing. Elsevier, Butterworth‐Heinemann Publ., 322
pp.
Google Scholar
Jaskoski, M. 2014. Environmental licensing and con ict in Peru's mining sector: a path‐dependent analysis. World Dev. 64: 873– 883.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
I. B. Lima, and W. L. Filho, eds. 2015. Rare Earths Industry: technological, Economic and Environmental Implications. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
Loureiro, M. L., J. B. Loomis, and M. X. Vázquez. 2009. Economic valuation of environmental damages due to the prestige oil spill in Spain.
Environ. Resour. Econ. 44: 537– 553.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
B. J. Merkel, and A. Arab, eds. 2015. Uranium‐past and future challenges. Springer, New York.
Crossref | Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 37/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Miranda, M., Q. A. Blanco‐Uribe, L. Hernández, G. J. Ochoa, and E. Yerena. 1998. All that glitters is not gold: balancing conservation and
development in Venezuela's frontier forests. World Resources Institute, Forest Frontiers Initiative. Available at
http://pdf.wri.org/all_that_glitters_is_not_gold.pdf (accessed 10 March 2017).
Google Scholar
Mudroch, A., U. Stottmeister, C. Kennedy, and H. Klapper, eds. 2002. Remediation of abandoned surface coal mining sites. Series:
Environmental Engineering. Springer, New York, 175 pp.
Crossref | Google Scholar
NEA/OECD. 2014. Managing environmental and health impacts of uranium mining. NEA No. 7062. Nuclear Energy Agency/Organisation for
Economic Co‐Operation and Development, Paris.
Google Scholar
NYT. 2011. Regulation lax as gas wells’ tainted water hits rivers. New York Times, 27 February, and e‐links therein. Available at
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/us/27gas.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (accessed 15 March 2017).
Google Scholar
Ponce, A., and C. McClintock. 2014. The explosive combination of ine cient local bureaucracies and mining production: evidence from
localized societal protests in Peru. Lat. Am. Polit. Soc. 56: 118– 140.
Wiley Online Library | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Reardon, A. C., ed. 2011. Metallurgy for the non‐metallurgist, 2nd edn. ASM International, Materials Park, OH, USA.
Crossref | Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 38/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Rosemarin, A. 2010. Peak phosphorus, the next inconvenient truth? – 2nd International Lecture Series on sustainable sanitation. World Bank,
Manila.
Google Scholar
Ross, M. L. 2015. What have we learned about the resource curse? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18: 239– 259.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Schnug, E., and L. J. De Kok. 2016. Phosphorus in agriculture: 100% zero. Springer, New York.
Google Scholar
Scholz, R. W., A. E. Ulrich, M. Eilittä, and A. Roy. 2013. Sustainable use of phosphorus: a nite resource. Sci. Total Environ. 461–462: 799–
803.
Crossref | CAS | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Schüler, D., M. Buchert, R. Liu, S. Dittrich, and C. Merz. 2011. Study on rare earths and their recycling. Final Report for the Greens/EFA Group
in the European Parliament. Institut for Applied Ecology, Darmstadt, Germany.
Google Scholar
Smil, V. 2004. World history and energy. In: Encyclopedia of Energy, C. Cleveland, ed., Vol. 6, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 549‐561.
Crossref | Google Scholar
Triscritti, F. 2013. Mining, development and corporate‐community con icts in Peru. Commun. Dev. J. 3: 437– 450.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
UNEP. 2011. Decoupling natural resources use impact and environmental impacts from economic growth. International Resource Panel, United
Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 39/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
UNEP. (2013). Metal Recycling: Opportunities, Limits, Infrastructure, A Report of the Working Group on the Global Metal Flows to the
International Resource Panel. M. A. Reuter, C. Hudson, A. Schaik, K. Heiskanen, C. Meskers, C. Hagelüken. United Nations, Environment,
Nairobi, Kenya.
Google Scholar
UNSCEAR. 2017. Sources, e ects and risks of ionizing radiation, United Nations scienti c committee on the e ects of atomic radiation. UNSCEAR
2016 Report to the General Assembly, with Scienti c Annexes. United Nations, New York.
Crossref | Google Scholar
U.S. EPA. 2016. Hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas: impacts from the hydraulic fracturing water cycle on drinking water resources in the United
States (Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA. EPA/600/R‐16/236F.
Google Scholar
USGS. 2008. The Global Flows of Metals and Minerals in D. G. Rogich, G. R. Matos, eds. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 2008–1355,
11 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1355/ .
Google Scholar
USGS. 2017a. Iron ore. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2017.
Google Scholar
USGS. 2017b. Aluminium. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2017.
Google Scholar
Vaccari, D. A. 2009. Phosphorus famine: the threat to our food supply. Scienti c American Magazine, 3 June 2009.
PubMed | Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 40/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Van Vuuren, D. P., A. F. Bouwman, and A. H. W. Beusen. 2010. Phosphorus demand for the 1970–2100 period: a scenario analysis of
resource depletion. Glob. Environ. Change 20: 428– 439.
Crossref | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
WCED. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Available at
http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-03.htm#III (accessed 15 March 2017).
Google Scholar
Wells, P. G. 2017. The iconic torrey canyon oil spill of 1967 – Marking its legacy. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 115: 1– 2.
Crossref | CAS | PubMed | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
World Bank. 2002. Treasure or Trouble? Mining in developing countries. World Bank and International Finance Corporation.
http://www.worldbank.org/mining .
Google Scholar
World Bank. 2007. Cost of pollution in China. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
World Bank. 2009. Mining together: large‐scale mining meets artisanal mining – a guide for action. World Bank, Washington, DC.
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/ 148081468163163514/Mining‐together‐large‐scale‐mining‐meets‐artisanal‐mining‐a‐guide‐
for‐action.
Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017a. Transfer Pricing in Mining with a Focus on Africa A Reference Guide for Practitioners. By P. Guj, S. Martin, B. Maybee, F.
Cawood, B. Bocoum, N. Gosai and S. Huibregtse. World Bank Group. January 2017.
Google Scholar
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 41/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
WSA. 2009. The three Rs of sustainable steel. World Steel Association. Fact Sheet: The three R's. September 2009. Available at
http://www.steel.org/~/media/Files/SMDI/Sustainability/3rs.pdf?la=en (accessed 1 March 2017).
Google Scholar
Yan, G., H.‐M. Cho, I. Lee, and G. Kim. 2012. Signi cant emissions of 210Po by coal burning into the urban atmosphere of Seoul, Korea.
Atmosph. Environ. 54: 80– 85.
Crossref | CAS | Web of Science® | Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, J., M. Williams, C. N. Waters, A. D. Barnosky, J. Palmesino, A. Rönnskog, M. Edgeworth, C. Neal, A. Cearreta, E. C. Ellis, J.
Grinevald, P. Ha , J. A. Ivar do Sul, C. Jeandel, R. Leinfelder, J. R. McNeill, E. Odada, N. Oreskes, S. J. Price2, A. Revkin, W. Ste en, C.
Summerhayes, D. Vidas, S. Wing, and A. P. Wolfe. 2017. Scale and diversity of the physical technosphere: A geological perspective. The
Anthropocene Review.Vol. 4: 9– 22.
Crossref | Google Scholar
Citing Literature
Download PDF
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 42/43
4/21/2021 Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change - Carvalho - 2017 - Food and Energy Security - Wiley Online Library
Opportunities
Subscription Agents
Advertisers & Corporate Partners
Copyright © 1999-2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.109 43/43