MBA Legal Aspects Assignment
MBA Legal Aspects Assignment
ASSIGNMENTS
Date of Submission at
the Learning Centre : 05-12-2010
Marks Obtained :
December-2010 1 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
The validity of consent depends not only on consents parties but their consents
must also be free. According to section 14, consent is said to be free when it is not
caused by :
1) Coercion has defined under sec.15 or
2) Undue influence as defined under sec. 16 or
3) Fraud has defined under sec. 17 or
4) Mis-representation or defined under sec. 18 or
5) Mistake subject to the probations of sec. 21& 22.
i) Coercion:
Sec. 15 “coercion is the committing or threatening to commit any act forbidden by
the Indian penal code or the unlawful detaining or threatening to detain any property, to
the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter
into an agreement. “ It is immaterial weather the Indian penal code is or is not in force in
the place where the coercion is employed.
Under English Law, coercion must be applied to one’s person only whereas under
Indian Law it can be one’s person or property.
So also under English Law, the subject of it must be the contracting party himself
or his wife, parent, child or other near relative. Under Indian Law, the act or threat may
be against any person. It is to be noted that he act need not be committed in India itself.
Unlawful detaining or threatening to detain any property it also coercion.
While threat to sue does not amount to coercion threat to file a false suit amounts
to coercion since Indian Penal Code forbids such an act.
December-2010 2 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
(c) Where a person, who is in a position to dominate the will of another, enters into a
contract with him and the transaction appears to be unconscionable. The burden
of proving that such contract was not by undue influence shall lie upon the person
in a position to dominate the will of the other.
Both coercion and undue influence are closely related. What contributes coercion
or undue influence depends upon the facts of each case.
Sec. 16(i) provides that two elements must be present. The first one is that the
relations subsisting between the parties to a contract are such that one of them is in a
position to dominate the will of the other.
Secondly, he uses that position to obtain unfair advantage over the other. In other
words, unlike coercion undue influence must come from a party to the contract and not a
stranger to it. Where the parties are not in equal footing or there is trust and confidence
between the parties, one party may be able to dominate the will of the other and use the
position to obtain an unfair advantage. However, where there is no relationship shown to
exit from which undue influence is presumed, that influence must be proved.
iii) Fraud:
A false statement made knowingly or without belief in its truth or recklessly
careless whether it be true or false is called fraud.
Sec. 17 of the act instead of defining fraud gives various acts which amount to fraud.
Sec. 17: Fraud means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a
contract or with his connivance or by his agent to induce him to enter into contract:
1) The suggestion that a fact is true when it is not true by one who does not believe it
to be true. A false statement intentionally made is fraud. An absence of honest
belief in the truth of the statement made is essential to constitute fraud. The false
statement must be made intentionally.
2) The active concealment of a fact by a person who has knowledge or belief of the
fact. Mere non-disclosure is not fraud where there is no duty to disclose.
3) A promise made without any intention of performing it.
4) Any other act fitted to deceive. The fertility of man’s invention in devising new
schemes of fraud is so great that it would be difficult to confine fraud within the
limits of any exhaustive definition.
5) Any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.
iv) Misrepresentation:
Before entering into a contract, the parties will may certain statements inducing
the contract. Such statements are called representation. A representation is a statement
of fact made by one party to the other at the time of entering into contract with an
intention of inducing the other party to enter into the contract. If the representation is
false or misleading, it is known as misrepresentation. A misrepresentation may be
innocent or intentional. An intentional misrepresentation is called fraud and is covered
under section 17 sec. 18 deals with an innocent misrepresentation.
v) Mistake:
Usually, mistake refers to misunderstanding or wrong thinking or wrong belief. But
legally, its meaning is restricted and is to mean “operative mistake”. Courts recognize
only such mistakes, which invalidate the contract. Mistake may be mistake of fact or
mistake of law.
Sec. 20 ”Where both parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter
of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void”.
December-2010 3 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Sec.21 ” A contract is not void able because it was caused by a mistake as to any
law in force in India: but a mistake as to a law not in force in India has the same effect as
a mistake of fact”.
Bilateral mistake: Sec.20 deals with bilateral mistake. Bilateral mistake is one
where there is no real correspondence of offer and acceptance. The parties are not really
in consensus-ad-item. Therefore there is no agreement at all.
A bilateral mistake may be regarding the subject matter or the possibility of performing
the contract.
______________________________________________________________________
In the above example, Prashant who has bought books worth Rs. 10,000/- can
also give an undertaking stating that after three month he will pay the amount to
Pitamber. Now Pitamber can retain that document with himself till the end of three
months or pass it on to others for meeting certain business obligation (like with Sunil, as
discussed above) before the expiry of that three months time period.
You must have heard about a cheque. What is it? It is a document issued to a
bank that entitles the person whose name it bears to claim the amount mentioned in the
cheque. If he wants, he can transfer it in favour of another person. For example, if Akash
issues a cheque worth Rs. 5,000/ - In favour of Bidhan, then Bidhan can claim Rs.
5,000/- from the bank, or he can transfer it to Chander to meet any business obligation,
like paying back a loan that he might have taken from Chander. Once he does it,
Chander gets a right to Rs. 5,000/- and he can transfer it to Dayanand, if required. Such
transfers may continue till the payment is finally made to somebody.
In the above examples, we find that there is certain documents used for payment
in business transactions and are transferred freely from one person to another. Such
documents are called Negotiable Instruments. Thus, we can say negotiable instrument is
December-2010 4 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
i. Promissory Note
Suppose you take a loan of Rupees Five Thousand from your friend Ramesh. You
can make a document stating that you will pay the money to Ramesh or the bearer on
demand. Or you can mention in the document that you would like to pay the amount after
three months. This document, once signed by you, duly stamped and handed over to
Ramesh, becomes a negotiable instrument.
Now Ramesh can personally present it before you for payment or give this
document to some other person to collect money on his behalf. He can endorse it in
somebody else’s name who in turn can endorse it further till the final payment is made by
you to whosoever presents it before you. This type of a document is called a Promissory
Note.
Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 defines a promissory note as
‘an instrument in writing (not being a bank note or a currency note) containing an
unconditional undertaking, signed by the maker, to pay a certain sum of money only to or
to the order of a certain person or to the bearer of the instrument’.
December-2010 5 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
iii. Cheques
Cheque is a very common form of negotiable instrument. If you have a savings
bank account or current account in a bank, you can issue a cheque in your own name or
in favour of others, thereby directing the bank to pay the specified amount to the person
named in the cheque.
Therefore, a cheque may be regarded as a bill of exchange; the only difference is
that the bank is always the drawee in case of a cheque.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 defines a cheque as a bill of exchange
drawn on a specified banker and not expressed to be payable otherwise than on
demand. Actually, a cheque is an order by the account holder of the bank directing his
banker to pay on demand, the specified amount, to or to the order of the person named
therein or to the bearer.
December-2010 6 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
iv. Hundis
A Hundi is a negotiable instrument by usage. It is often in the form of a bill of
exchange drawn in any local language in accordance with the custom of the place. Some
times it can also be in the form of a promissory note. A Hundi is the oldest known
instrument used for the purpose of transfer of money without its actual physical
movement. The provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act shall apply to hundis only
when there is no customary rule known to the people.
Types of Hundis
There are a variety of hundis used in our country. Let us discuss some of the most
common ones.
Shah-jog Hundi: one merchant draws this on another, asking the latter to pay the amount
to a Shah. Shah is a respectable and responsible person, a man of worth and known in
the bazaar. A shah-jog Hundi passes from one hand to another till it reaches a Shah,
who, after reasonable enquiries, presents it to the drawee for acceptance of the payment.
Darshani Hundi: This is a Hundi payable at sight. The holder must present it for payment
within a reasonable time after its receipt. Thus, it is similar to a demand bill.
Muddati Hundi: A Muddati or miadi Hundi is payable after a specified period of time. This
is similar to a time bill.
There are few other varieties like Nam-jog Hundi, Dhani-jog Hundi, and Jawabee Hundi,
Jokhami Hundi, Fireman-jog Hundi, etc.
December-2010 7 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
‘person’ includes individual, body corporate, trade unions, even secretary, director or
chairman of an institution. The payee can also be more than one person.
viii. A negotiable instrument must bear the signature of its maker. Without the signature
of the drawer or the maker, the instrument shall not be a valid one.
ix. Delivery of the instrument is essential. Any negotiable instrument like a cheque or a
promissory note is not complete till it is delivered to its payee. For example, you may
issue a cheque in your brother’s name but it is not a negotiable instrument till it is given
to your brother.
x. Stamping of Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes is mandatory. This is required as
per the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The value of stamp depends upon the value of the
promote or bill and the time of their payment.
December-2010 8 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
even a holder in due course, requiring the latter to resort to litigation to recover on the
instrument.
______________________________________________________________________
Indemnity Guarantee
Number of parties: There are two
There are three parties to it viz., the principal
parties: Indemnifier and Indemnified.
debtor, the surety & the creditor.
Number of Contracts: There is only
Three contracts: (i) between the principal debtor
one contract between the indemnified
and the creditor, (ii) between the surety and the
and Indemnifier.
creditor, and (iii) between the surety and the
principal debtor (implied).
Form: May be written or oral in both
Indian and English Law.
According to section 4, of the Statute of Frauds
(in England) it should be in writing: in Indian Law
Interest in the transaction: The
it may be written or oral.
indemnifier has interest in the
transaction apart from the indemnity
The guarantee is totally unconnected with the
i.e., apart from his promise to pay the
contract but the only interest in the contract is
loss.
his promise to the loss.
Nature of risk: It is possibility of risk of
There is an existing debt the discharge or
any loss happening in future against
performance of which is guaranteed by the surety
which the indemnifier undertakes to
i.e., it is the absolute and subsisting risk.
indemnify
i.e., continuing risk.
In a guarantee the liability of the surety is co-
extensive with that of the principal debtor
Nature of liability: The indemnifier is
(ancillary liability). The guarantor if secondarily
primarily and independently liable.
liable except where the principal debtor is
incapable of contracting).
Subrogation: An indemnifier cannot
have subrogation unless there is an
If a surety pay the debt or perform the obligation
assignment. Otherwise he must bring
he can file a suit in his own name against the
the suit in the name of the indemnified.
principal debtor to reimburse the amount so paid.
Request: It is not necessary for the
It is necessary for the surety to give his
indemnifier to act the request of the
guarantee at the request of the debtor.
indemnified.
______________________________________________________________________
December-2010 9 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
his/her own name, as assignee, or otherwise, have such action or remedy as the creditor
himself/herself might have had against the other joint debtors, or sureties, or their
representatives, to recover such proportion of the money, so paid, as may be justly due
from the defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
4) a) Mention the remedies for breach of contract. How will the injured party claim
it?
Ans:
Breach of Contract & Remedies:
1. Nature of breach :
A breach of contract occurs where a party to a contract fails to perform, precisely
and exactly, his obligations under the contract. This can take various forms for example,
the failure to supply goods or perform a service as agreed. Breach of contract may be
either actual or anticipatory.
December-2010 10 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Actual breach occurs where one party refuses to form his side of the bargain on
the due date or performs incompletely. For example: Poussard v Spiers and Bettini v
Gye.
Anticipatory breach occurs where one party announces, in advance of the due
date for performance, that he intends not to perform his side of the bargain. The innocent
party may sue for damages immediately the breach is announced. Hochster v De La
Tour is an example.
Effects of breach A breach of contract, no matter what form it may take, always
entitles the innocent party to maintain an action for damages, but the rule established by
a long line of authorities is that the right of a party to treat a contract as discharged arises
only in three situations.
The breaches, which give the innocent party the option of terminating the contract, are:
(a) Renunciation
Renunciation occurs where a party refuses to perform his obligations under the
contract. It may be either express or implied. Hochster v De La Tour is a case law
example of express renunciation.
Renunciation is implied where the reasonable inference from the defendant’s
conduct is that he no longer intends to perform his side of the contract. For example:
Omnium D’Enterprises v Sutherland.
(b) Breach of condition
The second repudiator breach occurs where the party in default has committed a
breach of condition. Thus, for example, in Poussard v Spiers the employer had a right to
terminate the soprano’s employment when she failed to arrive for performances.
(c) Fundamental breach
The third repudiator breach is where the party in breach has committed a serious
(or fundamental) breach of an in nominate term or totally fails to perform the contract.
A repudiator breach does not automatically bring the contract to an end. The innocent
party has two options: He may treat the contract as discharged and bring an action for
damages for breach of contract immediately. This is what occurred in, for example,
Hochster v De La Tour.
He may elect to treat the contract as still valid, complete his side of the bargain
and then sue for payment by the other side. For example, White and Carter Ltd v
McGregor.
2. Introduction to remedies
Damages are the basic remedy available for a breach of contract. It is a common
law remedy that can be claimed as of right by the innocent party.
The object of damages is usually to put the injured party into the same financial
position he would have been in had the contract been properly performed.
Sometimes damages are not an adequate remedy and this is where the equitable
remedies (such as specific performance and injunction) may be awarded.
3. Damages
i. Nature:
The major remedy available at common law for breach of contract is an award of
damages. This is a monetary sum fixed by the court to compensate the injured party.
In order to recover substantial damages the innocent party must show that he has
suffered actual loss; if there is no actual loss he will only be entitled to nominal damages
in recognition of the fact that he has a valid cause of action. In making an award of
damages, the court has two major considerations:
Remoteness – for what consequences of the breach is the defendant legally
responsible?
December-2010 11 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
The measure of damages – the principles upon which the loss or damage is
evaluated or quantified in monetary terms. The second consideration is quite distinct
from the first, and can be decided by the court only after the first has been determined.
As a consequence of the first limb of the rule in Hadley v Baxendale, the party in
breach is deemed to expect the normal consequences of the breach, whether he actually
expected them or not. Under the second limb of the rule, the party in breach can only be
held liable for abnormal consequences where he has actual knowledge that the abnormal
consequences might follow or where he reasonably ought to know that the abnormal
consequences might follow – Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries.
December-2010 12 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Anticipatory Breach:
A seller and a buyer have entered into a contract. Prior to the start of the contract,
the buyer informs the seller that he no longer requires his goods. The seller writes back
stating his intention to store the goods until the contract expires and then sue for a
breach of contract. The buyer replies with an angry letter stating that he could just sell
the goods to someone else. Advise all parties.
Actual breach:
A breach of contract occurs where a party to a contract fails to perform, precisely
and exactly, his obligations under the contract. This can take various forms for example,
the failure to supply goods or perform a service as agreed. Breach of contract may be
either actual or anticipatory.
Actual breach occurs where one party refuses to form his side of the bargain on
the due date or performs incompletely. For example: Poussard v Spiers and Bettini v
Gye.
_____________________________________________________________________
December-2010 13 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Privity of contract:
The doctrine of privity in contract law provides that a contract cannot confer rights
or impose obligations arising under it on any person or agent except the parties to it.
The premise is that only parties to contracts should be able to sue to enforce their rights
or claim damages as such. However, the doctrine has proven problematic due to its
implications upon contracts made for the benefit of third parties who are unable to
enforce the obligations of the contracting parties.
Third-party rights:
Privity of contract occurs only between the parties to the contract, most commonly
contract of sale of goods or services. Horizontal privity arises when the benefits from a
contract are to be given to a third party. Vertical privity involves a contract between two
parties, with an independent contract between one of the parties and another individual
or company.
If a third party gets a benefit under a contract, it does not have the right to go
against the parties to the contract beyond its entitlement to a benefit. An example of this
occurs when a manufacturer sells a product to a distributor and the distributor sells the
product to a retailer. The retailer then sells the product to a consumer. There is no privity
of contract between the manufacturer and the consumer.
This, however, does not mean that the parties do not have another form of action
e.g. Donoghue v. Stevenson – here a friend of Ms. Donoghue bought her a bottle of
ginger beer, which was defective. Specifically, the ginger beer contained the partially
decomposed remains of a snail. Since the contract was between her friend and the shop
owner, Mrs. Donoghue could not sue under the contract, but it was established that the
manufacturer has a duty of care owed to their consumers and she was awarded
damages in tort.
Privity is the legal term for a close, mutual, or successive relationship to the same
right of property or the power to enforce a promise or warranty.
______________________________________________________________________________
Company:
The term ‘company’ implies an association of a number of persons for some
common objective e.g. to carry on a business concern, to promote art, science or culture
in the society, to run a sport club etc. Every association, however, may not be a company
in the eyes of law as the legal import of the word ‘company’ is different from its common
parlance meaning. In legal terminology its use is restricted to imply an association of
persons,’ registered as a company' under the law of the land. The following are some of
the definitions of the company given by legal luminaries and scholars of law.
“Company means a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing
company. Existing company means a company formed and registered under the
previous company laws.” Companies Act, 1956 Sec. 3(i & ii)
A joint stock company is an artificial person invisible, intangible and existing only
in the eyes of law. Being a mere creature of law, it possesses only those properties
which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its
very existence.” – Justice Marshall
December-2010 14 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
From the above definitions it is clear that a company has a corporate and legal
personality. It is an artificial person and exists only in the eyes of law. It has an
independent legal entity, a common seal and perpetual succession.
Sometimes, the term ‘corporation’ (a word derived from the Latin word ‘corpus’
which means body) is also used for a company.
At present the companies in India are incorporated under the Companies Act,
1956.
4. Separate property: A company, being a legal entity, can buy and own property in its
own name. And, being a separate entity, such property belongs to it alone. Its members
are not the joint owners of the property even though it is purchased out of funds
contributed by them. Consequently, they do not have even insurable interest in the
property of the company. The property of the company is not the property of the
shareholders; it is the property of the company.
5. Limited liability: In the case of companies limited by shares the liability of every
member of the company is limited to the amount of shares subscribed by him. If the
member has paid full amount of the face value of the shares subscribed by him, his
liability shall be nil and he cannot be asked to contribute anything more. Similarly, in the
case of a company limited by guarantee, the liability of the members is limited up to the
December-2010 15 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
amount guaranteed by a member. The Companies Act, however, permits the formation
of companies with unlimited liability. But such companies are very rare.
7. Transferability of shares: The shares of a company are freely transferable and can
be sold or purchased through the Stock Exchange. A shareholder can transfer his shares
to any person without the consent of other members. Under the articles of association,
even a public limited company can put certain restrictions on the transfer of shares but it
cannot altogether stop it. A shareholder of a public limited company possessing fully paid
up shares is at liberty to transfer his shares to anyone he likes in accordance with the
manner provided for in the articles of association of the company. However, private
limited company is required to put certain restrictions on transferability of its shares. But
any absolute restriction on the right of transfer of shares is void
8. Capacity to sue and be sued: A company, being a body corporate, can sue and be
sued in its own name.
______________________________________________________________________________
December-2010 16 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Management
The efficient and effective operation of a business, and study of this subject, is
called management. The main branches of management are financial management,
marketing management, human resource management, strategic management,
production management, operation management, service management and information
technology management.
December-2010 17 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Secretary of State or equivalent and complying with certain other ongoing obligations.
The relationships and legal rights of shareholders, limited partners, or members are
governed partly by the charter documents and partly by the law of the jurisdiction where
the entity is organized. Generally speaking, shareholders in a corporation, limited
partners in a limited partnership, and members in a limited liability company are shielded
from personal liability for the debts and obligations of the entity, which is legally treated
as a separate "person." This means that unless there is misconduct, the owner's own
possessions are strongly protected in law, if the business does not succeed.
Where two or more individuals own a business together but have failed to
organize a more specialized form of vehicle, they will be treated as a general partnership.
The terms of a partnership are partly governed by a partnership agreement if one is
created, and partly by the law of the jurisdiction where the partnership is located. No
paperwork or filing is necessary to create a partnership, and without an agreement, the
relationships and legal rights of the partners will be entirely governed by the law of the
jurisdiction where the partnership is located.
A single person who owns and runs a business is commonly known as a sole
proprietor, whether he or she owns it directly or through a formally organized entity.
A few relevant factors to consider in deciding how to operate a business include:
1. General partners in a partnership (other than a limited liability partnership), plus
anyone who personally owns and operates a business without creating a separate
legal entity, are personally liable for the debts and obligations of the business.
2. Generally, corporations are required to pay tax just like "real" people. In some tax
systems, this can give rise to so-called double taxation, because first the
corporation pays tax on the profit, and then when the corporation distributes its
profits to its owners, individuals have to include dividends in their income when
they complete their personal tax returns, at which point a second layer of income
tax is imposed.
3. In most countries, there are laws which treat small corporations differently than
large ones. They may be exempt from certain legal filing requirements or labor
laws, have simplified procedures in specialized areas, and have simplified,
advantageous, or slightly different tax treatment.
4. To "go public" (sometimes called IPO) -- which basically means to allow a part of
the business to be owned by a wider range of investors or the public in general—
you must organize a separate entity, which is usually required to comply with a
tighter set of laws and procedures. Most public entities are corporations that have
sold shares, but increasingly there are also public LLCs that sell units (sometimes
also called shares), and other more exotic entities as well (for example, REITs in
the USA, Unit Trusts in the UK). However, you cannot take a general partnership
"public."
December-2010 18 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
December-2010 19 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Arbitration Agreement:
The foundation of arbitration is the arbitration agreement between the parties to
submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between
them. Thus, the provision of arbitration can be made at the time of entering the contract
itself, so that if any dispute arises in future, the dispute can be referred to arbitrator as
per the agreement. It is also possible to refer a dispute to arbitration after the dispute has
arisen. Arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or
in the form of a separate agreement. The agreement must be in writing and must be
signed by both parties. The arbitration agreement can be by exchange of letters,
document, telex, telegram etc
Court must refer the matter to arbitration in some cases: If a party approaches
court despite the arbitration agreement, the other party can raise objection. However,
such objection must be raised before submitting his first statement on the substance of
dispute. The original arbitration agreement or its certified copy must accompany such
objection. On such application the judicial authority shall refer the parties to arbitration.
Since the word used is “shall”, it is mandatory for judicial authority to refer the matter to
arbitration. However, once the opposite party already makes first statement to court, the
matter has to continue in the court. Once other party for referring the matter to arbitration
makes an application, the arbitrator can continue with arbitration and even make an
arbitral award.
i. It must be in writing [Section 7(3)]: Like the old law, the new law also requires the
arbitration agreement to be in writing. It also provides in section 7(4) that an exchange of
letters, telex, telegrams, or other means of telecommunications can also provide a record
of such an agreement. Further, it is also provided that an exchange of claim and defense
in which the existence of an arbitration agreement is alleged by one party and not denied
by the other, will also amount to be an arbitration agreement.
It is not necessary that the parties should sign such written agreement. All that is
necessary is that the parties should accept the terms of an agreement reduced in writing.
The naming of the arbitrator in the arbitration agreement is not necessary. No particular
form or formal document is necessary.
ii. It must have all the essential elements of a valid contract: An agreement stands
on the same footing as any other agreement. Every person capable of entering into a
contract may be a party to an arbitration agreement. The terms of the agreement must be
definite and certain; if the terms are vague it is bad for indefiniteness.
iii. The agreement must be to refer a dispute, present or future, between the parties
to arbitration: If there is no dispute, there can be no right to demand arbitration. A
dispute means an assertion of a right by one party and repudiation thereof by another. A
point as to which there is no dispute cannot be referred to arbitration. The dispute may
relate to an act of commission or omission, for example, with holding a certificate to
which a person is entitled or refusal to register a transfer of shares.
Under the present law, certain disputes such as matrimonial disputes, criminal
prosecution, questions relating to guardianship, questions about validity of a will etc. or
treated as not suitable for arbitration. Section 2(3) of the new Act maintains this position.
Subject to this qualification Section 7(1) of the new Act makes it permissible to enter into
December-2010 20 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Conduct of Arbitral Proceedings: The Arbitral Tribunal should treat the parties equally
and each party should be given full opportunity to present his case [Section 18]. The
Arbitral Tribunal is not bound by Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or Indian Evidence Act,
1872 [Section 19(1)]. The parties to arbitration are free to agree on the procedure to be
followed by the Arbitral Tribunal. If the parties do not agree to the procedure, the
procedure will be as determined by the arbitral tribunal.
Law of Limitation Applicable: Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable. For this purpose, date
on which the aggrieved party requests other party to refer the matter to arbitration shall
be considered. If on that date, the claim is barred under Limitation Act, the arbitration
cannot continue [Section 43(2)]. If Court sets Arbitration award aside, time spent in
arbitration will be excluded for purpose of Limitation Act. So that case in court or fresh
arbitration can start.
Flexibility in respect of procedure, place and language: Arbitral Tribunal has full
powers to decide the procedure to be followed, unless parties agree on the procedure to
be followed [Section 19(3)]. The Tribunal also has powers to determine the admissibility,
relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence [Section 19(4)]. Place of arbitration will
be decided by mutual agreement. However, if the parties do not agree to the place, the
same will be decided by tribunal [Section 20]. Similarly, language to be used in arbitral
December-2010 21 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
proceedings can be mutually agreed. Otherwise, Arbitral Tribunal can decide [Section
22].
Arbitral Award: Decision of Arbitral Tribunal is termed as 'Arbitral Award'. Arbitrator can
decide the dispute ex aqua ET bono (In justice and in good faith) if both the parties
expressly authorize him to do so [Section 28(2)]. The decision of Arbitral Tribunal will be
by majority. The arbitral award shall be in writing and signed by the members of the
tribunal [Section 29]. The award must be in writing and signed by the members of Arbitral
Tribunal [Section 31(1)]. It must state the reasons for the award unless the parties have
agreed that no reason for the award is to be given [Section 31(3)]. The award should be
dated and place where it is made should be mentioned. Copy of award should be given
to each party. Tribunal can make interim award also [Section 31(6)].
Cost of Arbitration- Cost of arbitration means reasonable cost relating to fees and
expenses of arbitrators and witnesses, legal fees and expenses, administration fees of
the institution supervising the arbitration and other expenses in connection with arbitral
proceedings. The tribunal can decide the cost and share of each party [Section 3 1(8)]. If
the parties refuse to pay the costs, the Arbitral Tribunal may refuse to deliver its award.
In such case, any party can approach Court. The Court will ask for deposit from the
parties and on such deposit, the Tribunal will deliver the award. Then Court will decide
the costs of arbitration and shall pay the same to Arbitrators. Balance, if any, will be
refunded to the party [Section 39].
Intervention by Court - One of the major defects of earlier arbitration law was that the
party could access court almost at every stage of arbitration - right from appointment of
arbitrator to implementation of final award. Thus, the defending party could approach
court at various stages and stall the proceedings. Now, approach to court has been
drastically curtailed. In some cases, if the party raises an objection, Arbitral Tribunal itself
can give the decision on that objection. After the decision, the arbitration proceedings are
continued and the aggrieved party can approach Court only after Arbitral Award is made.
Appeal to court is now only on restricted grounds. Of course, Tribunal cannot be given
unlimited and uncontrolled powers and supervision of Courts cannot be totally eliminated.
December-2010 22 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Arbitration Act has Over-Riding Effect: Section 5 of Act clarifies that notwithstanding
anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters governed by
the Act, the judicial authority can intervene only as provided in this Act and not under any
other Act.
Modes of Arbitration
(a) Arbitration without the intervention of the court. [Sec.3 to 19]
(b) Arbitration with the intervention of the court when there is no suit pending [Sec.20]
(c) Arbitration with the intervention of the court where a suit is pending. [Sec.21 to 25]
______________________________________________________________________________
Meditation is a holistic discipline during which time the practitioner trains his or her mind
in order to realize some benefit.
Meditation is generally an internal, personal practice and most often done without
any external involvement, except perhaps prayer beads to count prayers. Meditation
often involves invoking or cultivating a feeling or internal state, such as compassion, or
attending to a specific focal point. The term can refer to the state itself, as well as to
practices or techniques employed to cultivate the state.
There are hundreds of specific types of meditation. The word, 'meditation,' means
many things dependent upon the context of its use. People practice meditation for many
reasons, within the context of their social environment. Meditation is a component of
many religions, and has been practiced since antiquity, particularly by monastics. A 2007
study by the U.S. government found that nearly 9.4% of U.S. adults (over 20 million)
have used meditation within the past 12 months, up from 7.6% (more than 15 million
people) in 2002.
Even though strong and clear laws exist in India to protect consumer rights, the
actual plight of Indian consumers could be declared as completely dismal. Very few
consumers are aware of their rights or understand their basic consumer rights. Of the
several laws that have been enacted to protect the rights of consumers in India, the most
significant is the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Under this law, everyone, including
individuals, a Hindu undivided family, a firm, and a company, can exercise their
consumer rights for the goods and services purchased by them. It is important that, as
consumers, we know at least our basic rights and about the courts and procedures that
deal with the infringement of our rights.
December-2010 23 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
* The right to be fully informed about the performance and quality of all goods and
services
* The right to free choice of goods and services
* The right to be heard in all decision-making processes related to consumer interests
* The right to seek redressal, whenever consumer rights have been infringed
* The right to complete consumer education
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and various other laws like the Standards,
Weights & Measures Act have been formulated to ensure fair competition in the market
place and free flow of true information from the providers of goods and services to those
who consume them. However, the success of these laws would depend upon the
vigilance of consumers about their rights, as well as their responsibilities. In fact, the level
of consumer protection in a country is considered as the correct indicator of the extent of
progress of the nation.
The production and distribution systems have become larger and more
complicated today. The high level of sophistication achieved by the providers of goods
and services in their selling and marketing practices and various types of promotional
activities like advertising resulted in an increased need for higher consumer awareness
and protection. In India, the government has realized the plight of Indian consumers and
the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution has established the
Department of Consumer Affairs as the nodal organization for the protection of consumer
rights, redressal of all consumer grievances and promotion of standards governing goods
and services offered in India.
A complaint for infringement of consumer rights could be made under the following
circumstances in the nearest designated consumer court:
Memorandum of Association:
The memorandum of association of a company, often simply called the
memorandum (and then often capitalised as an abbreviation for the official name, which
is a proper noun and usually includes other words), is the document that governs the
relationship between the company and the outside. It is one of the documents required to
incorporate a company in the United Kingdom, Ireland and India, and is also used in
many of the common law jurisdictions of the Commonwealth.
December-2010 24 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Requirements
While it is still necessary to file a memorandum of association to incorporate a
new company, it no longer forms part of the company’s constitution and it contains
limited information compared to the memorandum that was required prior to 1 October
2009.
It is basically a statement that the subscribers wish to form a company under the
2006 Act, have agreed to become members and, in the case of a company that is to
have a share capital, to take at least one share each. It is no longer required to state the
name of the company, the type of company (such as public limited company or private
company limited by shares), the location of its registered office, the objects of the
company, and its authorised share capital.[1]
Companies incorporated prior to 1 October 2009 are not required to amend their
memorandum. Those details which are now required to appear in the Articles, such as
the objects clause and details of the share capital, are deemed to form part of the
Articles.
Capacities
The memorandum no longer restricts what a company is permitted to do. Since 1
October 2009, if a company's constitution contains any restrictions on the objects at all,
those restrictions will form part of the articles of association.
Historically, a company's memorandum of association contained an objects
clause, which limited its capacity to act. When the first limited companies were
incorporated, the objects clause had to be widely drafted so as not to restrict the board of
directors in their day to day trading. In the Companies Act 1989 the term "General
Commercial Company" was introduced which meant that companies could undertake
"any lawful or legal trade or business."
The Companies Act 2006 relaxed the rules even further, removing the need for an
objects clause at all. Companies incorporated on and after 1 October 2009 without an
objects clause are deemed to have unrestricted objects. Existing companies may take
advantage of this change by passing a special resolution to remove their objects clause.
If the company is to be a non-profit making company, the articles will contain a statement
saying that the profits shall not be distributed to the members.
Articles of association:
The term articles of association of a company, or articles of incorporation, of
an American or Canadian Company, are often simply referred to as articles (and are
often capitalized as an abbreviation for the full term). The Articles are a requirement for
the establishment of a company under the law of India, the United Kingdom and many
other countries. Together with the memorandum of association, they constitute the
constitution of a company. The equivalent term for LLC is Articles of Organization.
Roughly equivalent terms operate in other countries, such as Gesellschaftsvertrag in
Germany, statuts in France, statut in Poland.[1]
The following is largely based on British Company Law, references which are
made at the end of this Article.
The Articles can cover a medley of topics, not all of which is required in a
country's law. Although all terms are not discussed, they may cover:
• the issuing of shares (also called stock), different voting rights attached to different
classes of shares
• valuation of intellectual rights, say,the valuations of the IPR of one partner and,for
example,the real estate of the other
• the appointments of directors - which shows whether a shareholder dominates or
shares equality with all contributors
• directors meetings - the quorum and percentage of vote
December-2010 25 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
A Company is essentially run by the shareholders, but for convenience, and day-
to-day working, by the elected Directors. Usually, the shareholders elect a Board of
Directors (BOD) at the Annual General Meeting (AGM), which may be statutory (e.g.
India).
The number of Directors depends on the size of the Company and statutory
requirements. The Chairperson is generally a well-known outsider but he /she may be a
working Executive of the company, typically of an American Company. The Directors
may, or may not, be employees of the Company.
______________________________________________________________________________
(a) Expert Opinion: Complainant hires a technical expert to testify about the defective
characteristics of a product. A manufacturer has to retain highly qualified experts to rebut
the findings of complainant’s expert and also educate defence lawyer so well that he can
the bluff of complainants expert.
(c) Government and Industry Standard: Evidence that manufacturer has failed to meet
government or industry standards can be compelling proof of existence of defect and
when such standards are mandatory it also amounts to automatic findings of negligence.
(d) Post accident changes: Post accident changes may be considered as evidence that
original designs were deficient. Though this is a contentious factor as to whether such an
evidence is admissible a jury may be influenced by the same.
(e) Report of Government and the other agencies: Generally factual findings of an
official investigation forms admissible evidence.
December-2010 26 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
(f) Past record: Complainant may show that past record of the product proves his claim.
Manufacturer has the obligation of proving that other accidents were not similar.
______________________________________________________________________________
3) b) Write a short note on Unfair trade practices and Restrictive trade practice.
Ans:
General Principles
The freedom to pursue a livelihood, operate a business, and otherwise compete in
the marketplace is essential to any free enterprise system. Competition creates
incentives for businesses to earn customer loyalty by offering quality goods at
reasonable prices. At the same time, competition can also inflict harm. The freedom to
compete gives businesses the right to lure customers away from each other. When one
business entices enough customers away from competitors, those rival businesses may
be forced to shut down or move.
The law of unfair competition will not penalize a business merely for being
successful in the marketplace. Nor will the law impose liability simply because a business
is aggressively marketing its product. The law assumes, however, that for every dollar
earned by one business, a competitor will lose a dollar. Accordingly, the law prohibits a
business from unfairly profiting at a competitor's expense. What constitutes unfair
competition varies according to the Cause of Action asserted in each case. These
include actions for the infringement of Patents, Trademarks, and copyrights; actions for
the wrongful appropriation of Trade Dress, trade names, trade secrets, and service
marks; and actions for the publication of defamatory, false, and misleading
representations.
December-2010 27 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
A priority of ACCC enforcement action in recent years has been cartels. The
ACCC has in place an immunity policy, which grants immunity from prosecution to the
first party in a cartel to provide information to the ACCC allowing it to prosecute. This
policy recognizes the difficulty in gaining information/evidence about price-fixing
behaviors.
______________________________________________________________________________
Main Provisions
- Compulsory registration of shop/establishment within thirty days of commencement of
work.
- Communications of closure of the establishment within 15 days from the closing of the
establishment.
- Lays down the hours of work per day and week.
- Lays down guidelines for spread-over, rest interval, opening and closing hours, closed
days, national and religious holidays, overtime work.
December-2010 28 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
About What:
1. To regulate conditions of work and employment in shops, commercial
establishments, residential hotels, restaurants, eating houses, theatres, other
places of public entertainment and other establishments.
2. Provisions include Regulation of Establishments, Employment of Children, Young
Persons and Women, Leave and Payment of Wages, Health and Safety etc.
Returns:
1. Form-A or Form-B (as the case may be) {Section 7(2)(a), Rule 5}
Before 15th December of the calendar year, i.e. 15 days before the expiry date
The employer has to submit these forms to the authority notified along with the old
certificate of registration and the renewal fees for minimum one year’s renewal
and maximum of three year’s renewal
2. Form-E (Notice of Change) {Rule 8}
Within 15 days after the expiry of the quarter to which the changes relate in
respect of total number of employees qualifying for higher fees as prescribed in
Schedule-II and in respect of other changes in the original statement furnished
within 30 days after the change has taken place. (Quarter means quarter ending
on 31st March, 30th June, 30th September and 31st December)
Registers:
1. Form-A {Rule 5}
Register showing dates of Lime Washing etc
2. Form-H, Form-J {Rule 20(1)} (if opening & closing hours are ordinarily uniform)
Register of Employment in a Shop or Commercial Establishment
3. Form-I {Rule 20(3)}, Form-K (if opening & closing hours are ordinarily uniform)
Register of Employment in a Residential Hotel, Restaurant, Eating-House,
Theatre, or other places of public amusement or entertainment
4. Form-M {Rule 20(4)}
Register of Leave – This and all the above Registers have to be maintained by the
Employer
5. Visit Book
This shall be a bound book of size 7” x 6” containing at least 100 pages with every
December-2010 29 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Cyber crime
It refers to all the activities done with criminal intent in cyberspace or using the
medium of Internet. These could be either the criminal activities in the conventional
sense or activities, newly evolved with the growth of the new medium. Any activity, which
basically offends human sensibilities, can be included in the ambit of Cyber crimes.
1. Cyber crimes against persons: Cyber crimes committed against persons include
various crimes like transmission of child-pornography, harassment of any one with the
use of a computer and cyber stalking. The trafficking, distribution, posting, and
dissemination of obscene material including pornography, indecent exposure, and child
pornography constitute the most important cyber crimes known today. These threaten to
undermine the growth of the younger generation and also leave irreparable scars on the
minds of the younger generation, if not controlled.
Similarly, cyber harassment is a distinct cyber crime. Various kinds of
harassments can and do occur in cyberspace, or through the use of cyberspace.
Harassment can be sexual, racial, religious, or of any other nature. Cyber harassment as
a crime also brings us to another related area of violation of privacy of citizens. Violation
of privacy of online citizens is a cyber crime of a grave nature.
Cyber stalking: The Internet is a wonderful place to work, play and study. The net
is merely a mirror of the real world, and that means it also contains electronic versions of
real life problems. Stalking and harassment are problems that many persons especially
women, are familiar within real life. These problems also occur on the Internet, in the
form of “cyber stalking” or “online harassment”.
2. Cyber crimes against property: The second category of Cyber crimes is Cyber
crimes against all forms of property. These crimes include unauthorized computer
December-2010 30 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
3. Cyber crimes against Government: The third category of Cyber crimes is Cyber
crimes against Government. Cyber Terrorism is one distinct kind of crime in this
category. The growth of Internet has shown that individuals and groups to threaten
international governments as also to terrorize the citizens of a country are using the
medium of cyberspace. This crime manifests itself into Cyber Terrorism when an
individual “cracks” into a government or military maintained website, for the purpose of
perpetuating terror.
Since Cyber crime is a newly emerging field, a great deal of development has to
take place in terms of putting into place the relevant legal mechanism for controlling and
preventing cyber crime. The courts in United States of America have already begun
taking cognizance of various kinds of fraud and cyber crimes being perpetrated in
cyberspace. However, much work has to be done in this field. Just as the human mind is
ingenious enough to devise new ways for perpetrating crime, similarly, human ingenuity
needs to be canalized into developing effective legal and regulatory mechanisms to
control and prevent cyber crimes. A criminal mind can assume very powerful
manifestations if it is used on a network, given the reachability and size of the network.
Legal recognition granted to Electronic Records and Digital Signatures would
certainly boost E – Commerce in the country. It will help in conclusion of contracts and
creation of rights and obligations through electronic medium. In order to guard against
the misuse and fraudulent activities over the electronic medium, punitive measures are
provided in the Act. The Act has recognized certain offences, which are punishable. They
are: -
December-2010 31 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Fails to assist any agency of the Government to decrypt the information (Sec 69):
If any subscriber or any person-in-charge of the computer fails to assist or to
extend any facilities and technical assistance to any Government agency to decrypt the
information on the orders of the Controller in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity
of India etc. is a punishable offence under the Act. Such persons are liable for
imprisonment for a term, which may extend to seven years.
IT Act:
Publication of Digital Signature Certificate for fraudulent purpose (Sec 74):
Any person knowingly creates, publishes or otherwise makes available a Digital
Signature Certificate for any fraudulent or unlawful purpose shall be punished with
December-2010 32 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine up to one lakh
rupees or with both.
Redressal forum: Twenty-five years ago, consumer action in India was virtually unheard
of. It consisted of some action by individuals, usually addressing their own grievances.
Even this was greatly limited by the resources available with these individuals. There was
little organized effort or attempts to take up wider issues that affected classes of
consumers or the general public.
All this changed in the Eighties with the Supreme Court-led concept of public
interest litigation. It gave individuals and the newly formed consumer groups, access to
the law and introduced in their work the broad public interest perspective.
Telepress Features
Several important legislative changes took place during this period. Significant
were the amendments to the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (hereafter
"MRTP Act") and the Essential Commodities Acts, and the introduction of the
Environment Protection Act and the Consumer Protection Act. These changes shifted the
focus of law from merely regulating the private and public sectors to actively protecting
consumer interests.
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereafter "the Act") is a remarkable piece of
legislation for its focus and clear objective, the minimal technical and legalistic
procedures, providing access to redressal systems and the composition of courts with a
majority of non-legal background members.
The Act establishes a hierarchy of courts, with at least one District Forum at the
district level (Chennai has two), a State Commission at the State capitals and the
National Commission at New Delhi. The pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Forum is up
to Rs. one lakh and that of the State Commission is above Rs. one lakh and below Rs.
10 lakhs. All claims involving more than Rs. 10 lakhs are filed directly before the National
Commission. Appeals from the District Forum are to be filed before the State
Commission and from there to the National Commission, within thirty days of knowledge
of the order.
December-2010 33 MB 0035
SMU ID : 520946876 LEGAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS
Definition of a complaint
The UK Border Agency defines a complaint as “any expression of dissatisfaction
about the services provided by or for the UK Border Agency and/or about the
professional conduct of UK Border Agency staff, including contractors.”
December-2010 34 MB 0035