Encrypted Data Analysis
Encrypted Data Analysis
	
a   	
  
   	
  
	
 
 
 
 
 	
 
     
 
	 	 
 
 
	
 
   	
 	  	 
 		  
 		  	 
	
 	
 	 	
  
	 
 
	 
  
	
		
The mutual fund industry in India started in 1963 with the formation of Unit
Trust of India, at the initiative of the Government of India and Reserve Bank of
India. The history of mutua l funds in India can be broadly divided into four
distinct phases
Unit Trust of India (UTI) was established on 1963 by an Act of Parliament. It was
set up by the Reserve Bank of India and functioned under the Regulatory and
administrative control of the Reserve Bank of India. In 1978 UTI was de -linked
from the RBI and the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) took over the
regulatory and administrative control in place of RBI. The first scheme launched
by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. At the end of 1988 UTI had Rs.6,700crores of
assets under management.
1987 marked the entry of non - UTI, public sector mutual funds set up by public
sector banks and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and General
Insurance Corporation of India (GIC). SBI Mutual Fund was the first non - UTI
Mutual Fund established in June 1987 followed by Canbank Mutual Fund (Dec
87), Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund (Aug 89), Indian Bank Mutual Fund (Nov
89), Bank of India (Jun 90), Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund (Oct 92). LIC
established its mutual fund in June 1989 while GIC had set up it s mutual fund in
December 1990.
At the end of 1993, the mutual fund industry had assets under management of
Rs.47,004crores.
·ith the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new era started in the Indian
mutual fund industry, giving the Indian investors a wider choice of fund families.
Also, 1993 was the year in which the first Mutual Fund Regulations came into
being, under which all mutual funds, except UTI were to be registered and
governed. The erstwhile Kothari Pioneer (now merged with Franklin Templeton)
was the first private sector mutual fund registered in July 1993.
The 1993 SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations were substi tuted by a more
comprehensive and revised Mutual Fund Regulations in 1996. The industry now
functions under the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations 1996.
The number of mutual fund houses went on increasing, with many foreign
mutual funds setting up funds in India and also the industry has witnessed
several mergers and acquisitions. As at the end of January 2003, there were 33
mutual funds with total assets of Rs. 1,21,805crores. The Unit Trust of India with
Rs.44,541crores of assets under management was way ahead of other mutual
funds.
In February 2003, following the repeal of the Unit Trust of India Act 1963 UTI
was bifurcated into two separate entities. One is the Specified Undertaking of the
Unit Trust of India with assets under management of Rs.29,835crores as at the
end of January 2003, representing broadly, the assets of US 64 scheme, assured
return and certain other schemes. The Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of
India, functioning under an administrator and under the rules framed by
Government of India and does not come under the purview of the Mutual Fund
Regulations.
The second is the UTI Mutual Fund, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB and LIC. It is
registered with SEBI and functions under the Mutual Fund Regulations. ·ith the
bifurcation of the erstwhile UTI which had in March 2000 more than
Rs.76,000crores of assets under management and with the setting u p of a UTI
Mutual Fund, conforming to the SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations, and with recent
mergers taking place among different private sector funds, the mutual fund
industry has entered its current phase of consolidation and growth.
The graph indicates the growth of assets over the years.
Erstwhile UTI was bifurcated into UTI Mutual Fund and the Specified Undertaking
of the Unit Trust of India effective from February 2003. The Assets under
management of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India has
therefore been excluded from the total assets of the industry as a whole from
February 2003 onwards.
Y
3 3
There are a lot of investment avenues available today in the financial market for
an investor with an investable surplus. He can invest in Bank Deposits,
Corporate Debentures, and Bonds where there is low risk but low return. He may
invest in Stock of companies where the risk is high and the returns are also
proportionately high. The recent trends i n the Stock Market have shown that an
average retail investor always lost with periodic bearish tends. People began
opting for portfolio managers with expertise in stock markets who would invest
on their behalf. Thus we had wealth management services provi ded by many
institutions. However they proved too costly for a small investor. These investors
have found a good shelter with the mutual funds.
Mutual fund industry has seen a lot of changes in past few years with
multinational companies coming into the c ountry, bringing in their professional
expertise in managing funds worldwide. In the past few months there has been
a consolidation phase going on in the mutual fund industry in India. Now
investors have a wide range of Schemes to choose from depending on their
individual profiles.
    
The main purpose of doing this project was to know about mutual fund and its
functioning. This helps to know in details about mutual fund industry right from
its inception stage, growth and future prospects.
It also helps in understanding different schemes of mutual funds. Because my
study depends upon prominent funds in India and their schemes like equity,
income, balance as well as the returns associated with those schemes.
The project study was done to ascertain the asset allocation, entry load, exit
load, associated with the mutual funds. Ultimately this would help in
understanding the benefits of mutual funds to investors.
3
   To   give a brief idea about the benefits available from Mutual Fund investment
   To   give an idea of the types of schemes av ailable.
   To   discuss about the market trends of Mutual Fund investment.
   To   study some of the mutual fund schemes and analyse them
 Observe the fund management process of mutual funds
 Explore the recent developments in the mutual funds in India
 To give an idea about the regulations of mutual funds
To achieve the objective of studying the stock market data has been collected.
Research methodology carried for this study can be two types
1. Primary
2. Secondary
PRIMARY:
The data, which has being collected for the first time and it is the original data.
In this project the primary data has been taken from HSE staff and guide of the
project.
SECONDARY:
The secondary information is mostly taken from websites, books, journals, etc.
3 3
The Executive director as the chief executive officer is responsible for the day
today administration of the exchange. The average daily turnover of the
exchange during the year 2000 -01(April-March) was Rs 3984.19 crores and
average number of daily trades 5.69 Lakhs.
However the average daily turn over of the exchange during the year 2001 -02
has declined to Rs. 1244.10 crores and number of average daily trades during
the period to 5.17 Lakhs.
The average daily tur n over of the exchange during the year 2002 -03 has
declined and number of average daily trades during the period is also decreased.
The Ban on all deferral products like BLESS AND ALBM in the Indian capital
markets by SEBI with effect from July 2,2001, abo lition of account period
settlements, introduction of compulsory rolling settlements in all scripts traded
on the exchanges with effect from Dec 31,2001, etc., have adversely impacted
the liquidity and consequently there is a considerable decline in the da ily turn
over at the exchange. The average daily turn over of the exchange present
scenario is 110363(laces) and number of average daily trades 1057(laces).
ë  
In order to enable the market participants, analysts etc., to track the various
ups and downs in the Indian stock market, the Exchange has introduced in 1986
an equity stock index called BSE -SENSEX that subsequently became the
barometer of the moments of the share prices in the Indian Stock market. It is a
³Market capitalization weighted´ index of 30 component stocks representing a
sample of large, well-established and leading companies. The base year of
Sensex is 1978-79. The Sensex is widely reported in both domestic and
international markets through print as well as electronic media.
Sensex is calculated using a market capitalization weighted method. As per this
methodology, the level of the index reflects the total market value of all 30 -
component stocks from different industries related to particular base period. The
total market value of a company is determined by multiplying the price of its
stock by the number of shares outstanding. Statisticians call an index of a set of
combined variables (such as price and number of shares) a composite Index. An
Indexed number is used to represent the results of this calculation in order to
make the value easier to work with and track over a time. It is much easier to
graph a chart based on Indexed values than one based on actual values world
over majority of the well-known Indices are constructed using ´Market
capitalization weighted method´.
The NSE was incorporated in Now 1992 with an equity capital of Rs 25 crores.
The International securities consultancy (ISC) of Hong Kong has helped in
setting up NSE. ISE has prepared the detailed business plans and installation of
hardware and software systems. The promotions for NSE were financial
institutions, insurances companies, banks and SEBI capital market ltd,
Infrastructure leasing and financial services ltd and stock holding corporation ltd.
It has been set up to strengthen the move towards professionalisation of the
capital market as well as provide nation wide securities trading facilities to
investors.NSE is not an exchange in the traditional sense wher e brokers own and
manage the exchange. A two tier administrative set up involving a company
board and a governing aboard of the exchange is envisaged.
NSE is a national market for shares PSU bonds, debentures and government
securities since infrastructure and trading facilities are provided.
NSE-NIFTY:
The NSE on April 22, 1996 launched a new equity Index. The NSE -50. The new
index, which replaces the existing NSE -100 index, is expected to serve as an
appropriate Index for the new segment of futures and opt ions.
³Nifty´ means National Index for Fifty Stocks.
The NSE-50 comprises 50 companies that represent 20 broad Industry groups
with an aggregate market capitalization of around Rs. 1,70,000crs. All
companies included in the Index have a market capitalizati on in excess of Rs 500
crs each and should have traded for 85% of trading days at an impact cost of
less than 1.5%.
The base period for the index is the close of prices on Nov 3, 1995, which makes
one year of completion of operation of NSE¶s capital market segment. The base
value of the Index has been set at 1000.
 c3	3 
The NSE madcap Index or the Junior Nifty comprises 50 stocks that represents
21 aboard Industry groups and will provide proper representation of the madcap
segment of the Indian capital Market. All stocks in the index should have market
capitalization of greater than Rs.200 crores and should have traded 85% of the
trading days at an impact cost of less 2.5%.
The base period for the index is Nov 4, 1996, which signifies two years for
completion of operations of the capital market segment of the operations. The
base value of the Index has been set at 1000.
Average daily turn over of the present scenario 258212 (Laces) and number of
averages daily trades 2160(Laces).
There are numerous benefits of investing in mutual funds and one of the key
reasons for its phenomenal success in the developed markets like US and UK is
the range of benefits they offer, which are unmatched by most other investment
avenues. ·e have explained the key benefits in this section. The benefits have
been broadly split into universal benefits, applicable to all sch emes, and benefits
applicable specifically to open -ended schemes. Universal Benefits
Tax ëenefits: Any income distributed after March 31, 2002 will be subject to
tax in the assessment of all Unit holders. However, as a measure of concession
to Unit holders of open-ended equity-oriented funds, income distributions for the
year ending March 31, 2003, will be taxed at a concessional rate of 10.5%.
In case of Individuals and Hindu Undivided Families a deduction uptoRs. 9,000
from the Total Income will be admissible in respect of income from investments
specified in Section 80L, including income from Units of the Mutual Fund. Units
of the schemes are not subject to ·ealth-Tax and Gift-Tax.
Convenience: An investor can purchase or sell fund units directly from a fund,
through a broker or a financial planner. The investor may opt for a Systematic
Investment Plan (³SIP´) or a Systematic ·ithdrawal Advantage Plan (³S·AP´).
In addition to this an investor receives account statements a nd portfolios of the
schemes.
Market Risk: Sometimes prices and yields of all securities rise and fal l. Broad
outside influences affecting the market in general lead to this. This is true, may
it be big corporations or smaller mid -sized companies. This is known as Market
Risk. A Systematic Investment Plan (³SIP´) that works on the concept of Rupee
Cost Averaging (³RCA´) might help mitigate this risk.
Interest Rate Risk: In a free market economy interest rates are difficult if not
impossible to predict. Changes in interest rates affect the prices of bonds as well
as equities. If interest rates rise the prices of bonds fall and vice versa. Equity
might be negatively affected as well in a rising interest rate environment. A well -
diversified portfolio might help mitigate this risk.
-iquidity Risk: Liquidity risk arises when it becomes difficult to sell the
securities that one has purchased. Liquidity Risk can be partly mitigated by
diversification, staggering of maturities as well as internal risk controls that lean
towards purchase of liquid securities.
   u   Call Risk. The possibility that falling interest rates will cause a bond
       issuer to redeem²or call²its high-yielding bond before the bond's
       maturity date.
   u   Country Risk. The possibility that political events (a war, national
       elections), financial problems (rising inflation, government default), or
       natural disasters (an earthquake, a poor harvest) will weaken a country's
       economy and cause investments in that country to decline.
   u   Credit Risk. The possibility that a bond issuer will fail to repay interest
       and principal in a timely manner. Also called default risk.
   u   Currency Risk. The possibility that returns could be reduced for
       Americans investing in foreign securities because of a rise in the value of
       the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. Also called exchange -rate risk.
   u   Income Risk. The possibility that a fixed -income fund's dividends will
       decline as a result of falling overall interest rates.
   u   Industry Risk. The possibility that a group of stocks in a single industry
       will decline in price due to developments in that industry.
   u   Inflation Risk. The possibility that increases in the cost of living will
       reduce or eliminate a fund's real inflation -adjusted returns.
   u   Interest Rate Risk. The possibility that a bond fund will decline in value
       because of an increase in interest rates.
   u   Manager Risk. The possibility that an actively managed mutual fund's
       investment adviser will fail to execute the fund's investment strategy
       effectively resulting in the failure of stated objectives.
   u   Market Risk. The possibility that stock fund or bond fund prices overall
       will decline over short or e ven extended periods. Stock and bond markets
       tend to move in cycles, with periods when prices rise and other periods
       when prices fall.
   u   Principal Risk. The possibility that an investment will go down in value,
       or "lose money," from the original or invested amount.
	 
 
c	
		 
To cater to different investment needs, Mutual Funds offer various investment
options. Some of the important investment options include:
Growth Option:
Dividend is not paid-out under a Growth Option and the investor realises only
the capital appreciation on the investment (by an increase in NAV).
Insurance Option:
Certain Mutual Funds offer schemes that provide insurance cover to investors as
an added benefit.
	
	 	
		
 
 	 	
  	 
  
 
  	  
 	
 
	  
 
   
  ! 
 !
 "
#	
 !  ! 
 	  $	 
 %
	
 
 	 &$%'  
 
 ( ) 
 *
	  +
 	 %
	
 $		 &*+ %'
  $	 
 $		   
 
 *+ %  
  
 	
 
 
 	 
 
  
  
 
 	
	
 	  
		
 
 
	
 
	
  
 	 
  
  	 
	
 
 
   
	
  			
 
  a)%  
  
	 
 
 a)% 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  	 
 
  	
  
 
	 	 
  ,!
c a
	
 
 
   
 	
	
 
    
 	
  
  
- 
 
 a)% 	
 
  
	 
	
 
 . 	 
 
 	  
 	
  
  	 
  
	
a %
	 
 
 
 
  	
 & 
 
		
 	
' a 
	 
 
   	
 	 	 ,!   
 /01 
	 	
 	  
	 
 	 -  
	 
 
	 
 
 	
 	
 
 
	 	 
  
 
  
	   
 
	 
	 
	 
  
  
	
 2" )
 %
 	
 
 
  	
	
  
 
 a %
 	
 	  
 	
-
	
  	
 	 	 	
 "
	
  
  
  
 
  	
 %a) 	
  	 
 a 	 	
 	
		  
) 
  
		 
  
	
 
 	
u   
u   
 
	
     
 
 
 
   	 	  
  	
 	 
 
 
  
	
 	 
	
 
 
   
 
 	
 
 
  
 	
   
  #a3  	
     
 
   	 	 	
   
 
 
		
 
 
  
		
	
 a  	 
 	
 	
 	
   
 
  	
 
  
  
 
  	
 
 
 
   
	
 
 	
	
  	
  
   	 	
 
    #a3  	
3
   
 
   
		
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
  	 
 
   
   	 	
  #a3
 	
  
 
  	  	 		
 
  	 
 
  (
 
 	
  
 
	
 
  
	
 	 		
    
 
    
	
  	
 	 	   
 	 		
 	 	
 
		
  	 
 
 
 	
 
 
	 
 	
  	
		
 
  
 
3   
 
 	
 		 	 	 	
 	
 	
	
 
	
 
 	  
 
	 	 	
 
  	 
 
 
c  
  
)
  
 	
 	 
   	
 	  	
   
	 			 
 
  
	 
   
 	
 
	
 
 
 
 
 	
 	  
 
 	
   
 
  	  
	  
 
 	
  
		 
	
	
 
 
  a 4564 
 	
 	
 
 ,	 $	 	
 
 &,$'
 "
	
 
  	 
 	
 
 77 
  
  a 4564
3   
 
 
	 
 	
  
 
 
		  	 	
 
 
  !,
,#,8 %#8 #	  	    
 	 
 	 
 
 
 	  
 
 
  
 	  	 
		 
	
 
   
 
 	
 	  
		 	
 
 
  	
 
  	  	
	
 &!	 "	
 
 ' 
  
 
 	
	
 
 	
 &	 9a- :
 
'
 
 	
 
  	
   
  
  	  
		  
 
 
 	
 	  
 
 
  	  		  	 &;" %#8 #	 !,
' 
  	 	
 &	 	
	
 
' 
 
	 &
  
	 
'
 
	 
 
  
	 
 
  	 	
 	  	
	 	 
	
		
Y
	 
 	
			
3 
The Indian Mutual fund industry has witnessed considerable growth since its
inception in 1963. The assets under management (AUM) have surged to Rs
4,173 bn in Mar-09 from just Rs 250 mn in Mar-65. In a span of 10 years (from
1999 to 2009), the industry has registered a CAGR of 22.3%, albeit
encompassing some shortfalls in AUM due to business cycles.
The impressive growth in the Indian Mutual fund industry in recent years can
largely be attributed to various factors such as rising household savings,
comprehensive regulatory framework, favourable tax policies, introduction of
several new products, investor education campaign and role of distributors.
In the last few years, household¶s income levels have grown significantly,
leading to commensurate increase in household¶s savings. Household financial
savings (at current prices) registered growth rate of around 17.4% on an
average during the period FY04 -FY08 as against 11.8% on an average during
the period FY99-FY03. The considerable rise in household¶s financial savings,
point towards the huge market potential of the Mutual fund industry in India.
Besides, the Indian Mutual fund industry that started with traditional products
like equity fund, debt fund and balanced fund has significantly expanded its
product portfolio. Today, the industry has introduced an array of products such
as liquid/money market funds, sector-specific funds, index funds, gilt funds,
capital protection oriented schemes, special category funds, insurance linked
funds, exchange traded funds, etc. It also has introduced Gold ETF fund in 2 007
with an aim to allow mutual funds to invest in gold or gold related instruments.
Further, the industry has launched special schemes to invest in foreign
securities. The wide variety of schemes offered by the Indian Mutual fund
industry provides multiple options of investment to common man.
·ith a strong growth in the AUM of domestic Mutual fund industry, the ratio of
AUM to GDP increased gradually from 4.7% in 2001 to 8.5% in 2009. The share
of mutual funds in households¶ financial savings also witnes sed a substantial
increase to 7.7% in 2008 as against 1.3% in 2001.
The investor-wise pattern of asset-holding as well as investors accounts reveals
that individual investors account for almost 96.75% of total investors account
and contribute Rs 1552.8 bn which is 37.0% of the total net assets as on March
31, 2009. The comparatively lower share of net assets of individual investors in
total net assets is mainly because of lower penetration of mutual fund as an
investment instrument among working populat ion (age group 18-59 years). A
majority of investors in the age group 18 -59 years are not aware of mutual
funds or of investing in mutual funds through Systematic Investment Plan
(SIP). However, take up of mutual fund as an investment opportunity by
individual investors, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns, is expected to
increase in the near future.
Corporate/institutions sector on the other hand, though account for only 1.2%
of the total number of investors¶ accounts in Mutual funds industry, contribu te
as much as 56.3% to the total net assets of the industry as on March 31, 2009.
Despite a rise in net FII inflows in the domestic mutual funds, FIIs constitute a
very small percentage of investors¶ accounts (0.0003%) and contribute Rs
49.83 bn to the total net assets (1% of total net assets of the Indian Mutual
fund industry as on March 31, 2009).
The net resource mobilisation of domestic mutual funds which registered strong
growth in FY2000 due to the tax incentives announced in the Union Budget for
FY2000, witnessed a sharp decline in FY01. The decline in resource mobilisation
in FY01 was primarily due to the bearish trend in the domestic stock markets
and problems in UTI. The resource mobilisation continued to remain at low level
upto FY05. In FY05 re source mobilisation by mutual funds declined by almost
95.3% on account of redemption pressures on income, gilt and equity -linked
saving schemes subsequent to shift of resources in favour of small saving
schemes that offered attractive tax adjusted rates o f return. Mutual funds
mobilised huge amount of resources under liquid/money market schemes &
growth/equity oriented schemes, while resource mobilisation under debt
schemes experienced sharp fall due to change in interest rate scenario. ·hile,
the resource mobilisation by mutual funds witnessed strong growth during
FY06-FY07 and in the period Apr -Aug 07 due to buoyant capital market
conditions, the eruption of sub-prime mortgage crisis during Sep-07 and
consequent volatility witnessed in the domestic stock markets led to decline in
resource mobilisation. The net resource mobilisation of mutual funds turned
negative as there was a net outflow of Rs 282.97 bn during FY09 as against a
net inflow of Rs 1,538.01 bn during FY08. The uncertain conditions in stock
markets coupled with redemption pressures from banks and corpoates amidst
tight liquidity conditions resulted in significant outflows during the months of
Jun-08 (Rs 392.3 bn), Sep-08 (Rs 456.5 bn) and Oct-08 (458 bn). This led the
RBI to announce various liquidity augmentation measures to provide liquidity
support to mutual funds through banks. ·ith the easing of overall liquidity
conditions, net resource mobilisation by mutual funds again turned positive
between the period Dec-08 to Feb-09. Further, with liquidity conditions
remaining comfortable and stock markets registering strong gains, the net
resource mobilisation by mutual funds grew considerably during the first
quarter of FY10.
The data reveals that the increase in revenue and profitability of the Mutual
fund industry has not been commensurate with the AUM growth in past few
years. The increased expenditure on marketing, distribution and administration
exerted upward pressure on the operating expenses, thereby impacting AMC¶s
margins. The operating expenses as a percentage of AUM rose from 41 basis
points in FY04 to 113 basis points in FY08.
Deepening of the global financial crisis during September 2008, which resulted
in liquidity crunch world-over, had dampening impact of the Indian Mutual fund
industry. ·ith the drying up of credit inflows from banks and external
commercial borrowings route, mutual funds witnessed redemption pressure
from corporates. Although the mutual funds promised immediate redempti on,
their assets were relatively illiquid. Besides, mutual funds faced problems such
as maturity mismatches between assets & liabilities of mutual funds, shift from
mutual funds to bank deposits in view of the comparatively higher interest rates
being offered by banks and freezing up of money markets due to lack of buyers
for assets like certificates of deposits of private sector banks.
During Apr-Sep 08, net mobilisation of funds by mutual funds declined sharply
by 97.7% to Rs 24.8 bn due to uncertain cond itions prevailing in the domestic
stock markets. The redemption pressures witnessed by mutual funds led to net
outflows under both the income/debt-oriented schemes and growth/equity-
oriented schemes. Further, the AUM of Mutual fund industry contracted by
20.7% from Rs 5,445.4 bn as on August 31, 2008 to Rs 4,319.0 bn as on
October 31, 2008. During the same period, liquid and debt schemes which
contribute more than 65% to the total AUM witnessed a decline of 19% in AUM.
In an endeavour to ease liquidity pres sures in the system and restore stability
in the domestic financial markets, the RBI announced a slew of measures. The
key measures announced by the RBI include:
    u   The RBI decided to conduct a special 14 day repo at 9% per annum for a
        notified amount of Rs 200 bn from October 14, 2008 with a view to enable
        banks to meet the liquidity requirements of mutual funds.
    u   Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) and All India term lending and
        refinancing institutions were allowed to lend against and buy back CDs
        held by mutual funds for a period of 15 days.
    u   As a temporary measure, banks were allowed to avail of additional
        liquidity support exclusively for the purpose of meeting the liquidity
        requirements of mutual funds to the extent of up to 0.5% of their net
        demand and time liabilities (NDTL). Accordingly on November 1, 2008, it
        was decided to extend this facility and allow banks to avail liquidity
        support under the LAF through relaxation in the maintenance of SLR to
        the extent of up to 1.5% of their NDTL. This relaxation in SLR was
        provided for the purpose of meeting the funding requirements of NBFCs
        and mutual funds.
    u   The borrowing limit prescribed in Regulation 44(2) of SEBI (Mutual Fund)
        Regulations, 1996 was enhanced from 20% of net asset of the scheme to
        40% of net asset of the scheme to those mutual funds who approached
        SEBI. This enhanced borrowing limit was made available for a period of
        six months and could be utilised for the purpose of redemptions/
        repurchase of units.
    u   In order to moderate the exit from close en ded debt schemes and in the
        interest of those investors who choose to remain till maturity and with a
        view to ensure that the value of debt securities reflects the current market
        scenario in calculation of NAV, the discretion given to mutual funds to
        mark up/ mark down the benchmark yields for debt instruments of more
        than 182 days maturity was enhanced from 150 basis points to 650 basis
        points.
The significant reduction in CRR & SLR, net injection of Rs 9,279 bn through the
repo window during Oct-08, the repurchase of MSS bonds worth Rs 200 bn
along with the earlier mentioned liquidity augmentation measures helped to
ease liquidity pressures for domestic mutual funds. The data reveals that about
18 mutual funds borrowed from banks. Further, the increase of borrowing limits
enabled the mutual funds to meet redemption pressures without engaging in a
large scale sale of assets which could have caused systemic instability. As on
November 10, 2008, 15 mutual funds had been extended the enhanced
borrowing limit as per their requests made to SEBI.