Scribd
Upload
38 views1 page

Preliminary and Final Remedies: David H. Herrington, Alexandra K. Theobald

The document outlines public policy considerations related to the vacatur of arbitral awards and examines court practices in various countries, including the United States, France, England, Germany, and Switzerland. It discusses the practical relevance of public policy at different stages of arbitration, such as prior to, during, and post-arbitration. Additionally, it introduces preliminary and final remedies in intellectual property arbitration, detailing available relief and enforcement mechanisms.

Uploaded by

MansourJafari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
38 views1 page

Preliminary and Final Remedies: David H. Herrington, Alexandra K. Theobald

The document outlines public policy considerations related to the vacatur of arbitral awards and examines court practices in various countries, including the United States, France, England, Germany, and Switzerland. It discusses the practical relevance of public policy at different stages of arbitration, such as prior to, during, and post-arbitration. Additionally, it introduces preliminary and final remedies in intellectual property arbitration, detailing available relief and enforcement mechanisms.

Uploaded by

MansourJafari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CONTENTS

D. Public Policy Considerations as Grounds for


Vacatur of the Arbitral Award at the Seat of the
Arbitration ................................................................ 530
E. Key Issues in Public Policy Limitations on the
Validity or Enforcement of Awards ......................... 532
1. Court Practice in the United States .....................535
2. Court Practice in France ......................................536
3. Court Practice in England ...................................538
4. Court Practice in Germany ..................................539
5. Court Practice in Switzerland .............................539
6. Public Policy of the European Union ..................541
7. General Considerations .......................................543
IV. Practical Relevance of Public Policy Considerations
at Different Stages of the Arbitration ............................ 544
A. Prior to Arbitration ................................................... 545
B. During Arbitration .................................................... 546
C. Post-Arbitration ........................................................ 547
V. Summary and Practical Considerations ......................... 548

CHAPTER 10 .................................................................................. 551


Preliminary and Final Remedies
David H. Herrington, Alexandra K. Theobald
I. Introduction.................................................................... 551
II. Preliminary Relief in Intellectual Property
Arbitration ..................................................................... 552
A. Available Preliminary Relief .................................... 553
B. The Power of an Arbitral Tribunal to
Grant Interim Relief and the Ability to
Enforce Such Relief in Court ................................... 557
1. Rules of Selected Arbitral Institutions ................558
2. Availability and Enforcement of Interim
Relief under National Laws ................................564
3. International Conventions ...................................568
C. Court-ordered Provisional Relief Pending
Arbitration ................................................................ 570
D. Requirements for a Grant of Preliminary Relief....... 573

xiii

You might also like