| wrongfully granted to the Plaintiffs in this Court on August 18. | 44. The opposing attorneys have acted abusive and illegal against me| VERIFICATION AND DECLARATION OF VALERIE ANNE LOPEZ 4. 1am Valerie Anne Lopez, Defendant in this case and lawful owner of| 30160 Merrell Avenue Nuevo California. | have knowledge of the matters contained herein and they are true and correct of my own personal knowledge. 2. I make this Declaration under penalty of perjury and consistent with the| legislative intent behind the statutory laws made law in the California] Assembly, which | have studied. 3. | am well versed in Title Curative work as this is my profession. 4. | have served as a bank fraud investigator. 5. | have referred over 250 cases to US Treasury pursuant to Suspicious Activity Report Banking Regulations. 6. If called and sworn as a witness, | could and would testify competently; to all matters asserted and addressed this Declaration. 7. | have been a contributing professional in the real estate and mortgage lending industry since 1988. a. 8. | have properly negotiated and transferred loan transaction in compliance with California statutory laws for over 10 years. 9. | request a continuance of the Plaintiffs Prove Up Hearing in the interests of substantial justice and not merely for purposes of delay. 40. | submit that it would be equitable, fair, and just and therefore| consistent with law and judicial economy that the Plaintiff's Prove Up Hearing be held on the same day as my Motion to Vacate the MSJ default judgment since 2009 acting in bad faith. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF DEFAULT PROVE-UP HEARING ona Catron te -15- ryanCar nnevn 42. | have been harmed financially and made homeless. 43. Aldridge Pite and Anglin Flewelling & Rasmussen have continually ignored the law and violated the Dodd Frank Act illegally to attempt to! | liquidate my home. 44. Under the Dodd Frank Act, the behavior of Pite Duncan and Anglin Flewelling are established by Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive or Practices Act. 45. My Motion to Vacate the MSJ default judgment, which | have set for 2-| 4-2022 is supported by irrefutable evidence of the blatant fraudulent acts off improper service of the opposing attorneys i.e. sending documents to wrong} addresses and sending pleadings to email without my authorization, in violation and complete derogation of California Rules of Court 2.251 electronic service Part 1 and Part 2 and Ca Code of Civil Procedure 1010.6 Exhibit A. 46. The documents created by the attorneys with the intent of carrying out the crime recognized by CFPB as Property for Profit have slandered my title. In 2012, | was not able to sell my house due to their crimes and antics in the) bankruptcy court of Santa Ana, California 17. | have had to live in hotels and rent rooms as | try to defend my assets. Losing my home to Property for Profit would further harm me as confirmed by| the Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive or Practices Act defined buy Dodd Frank| Act. 418. The Plaintiff's attorneys have committed serious crimes for which they} must be reprimanded and punished. 19. To date, | have reversed two illegal liquidation of my homes. 20. | am currently successfully managing a RICO case in US Central District court related to a home that Aldridge Pite illegally liquidated knowing DEFENDANT'S NoTIcE OF Ex-PaRTE ApPLicaTION FOR —16 —~ abenae ane tore CONTINUANCE OF DEFAULT PROVE-UP HEARING onan cAiFORN asB Be RY that the Federal Injunction was in place, that this injunction constitutes res| judicata as to all material questions before this court, and that the original (alleged) lender is non — existent. One of the home Craig Reimer participated in deny me due process 2328 Sunningdale Drive Tustin California 21. I need my home located at 30160 Merrell Avenue Nuevo California and | the court must do the right thing as promised when the oath was taken to defend the Constitution 22. | incorporate by reference the sworn affidavit of Texas Private Investigator Joe Esquivel (Exhibit B) as if the same were fully copied and| restated herein as part of my own. 23. There are 3 Assignments on my home which are invalid ref. in Equivel | Affidavit: Signature Record held by State of Minnesota of Janet L. Jones. First Fraudulent Assignment whereby Janet L. Jones permitted someone to, use her notary stamp and sign for her as a notary. Second Assignment of; Deed of Trust whereby Janet L. Jones is now permitting someone to sign for| her and Nicholas Wolfe the Minnesota Notary notarizing the alleged signature of Janet L. Jones. The first Assignment of Deed of Trust created by| Pite Duncan Attorneys. This assignment is void as Dead Corporations cannot execute documents once ceased in California. The MERS relationship with the first lender ceased and is similar to a power of attorney. MERS can no} longer sign anything for a dead corporation. Pite Duncan attorneys and’ Anglin Flewelling & Rasmussen attorney trespassed into the Bankruptcy| court with this fraudulent assignment. 24, My BK case filed is 8:10-bk-22755-CD Cal which listed the debt || serviced by Wells Fargo as unsecured debt on Schedule F. This DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR — 17 — la erstanstaeer CONTINUANCE OF DEFAULT PROVE-UP HEARING nance CaLrONN 8ous 3S SS =< 2 B = | substituted trustee on the deed of trust ( to the dead corporation GN) | Orange VALERIE ANNE LOPEZ. Trespass of private contract by people with| Categorization was never challenged, and | received by discharge on 5/12/2012. 25. Despite the above discharge, family and friends of Aldridge Pite — ex partners and Associates working for Cal Western Reconveyance LLC , purporting to act on the deed of trust, purported to initiate a non — judicial foreclosure proceeding against me and the property 26. This was done even though it was not any trustee or lawfully) Mortgage LLC. 27. CONFERENCE WITH PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL WAS FRUITLESS & FUTILE: 28. On 12/1/2021 at 4:29 P.M. | telephoned Mathew Pero and requested that he stipulate to a continuance of the Prove Up Hearing and have it heard} on the same day as my Motion to Vacate the MSJ granted to his firm on 8/18/2020, as would be just and proper and therefore authorized by law. 29. | explained my circumstances in detail. However, Mathew Pero} refused to stipulate to continue his hearing to my motion date and informed me that my deed — the subject of case is improper because it is a contract) between my lawful business with assigned EIN and DBA from County of no authority is not supported by state and federal law. 30. No previous continuances for any hearing to date has been granted by| court order or stipulation have been granted in this case. 31. | had reason to believe the court would honor the Federal Injunction} discharging my debt, which constitutes res judicata, see attached Exhibit, Declaration of Texas P.I. Joe Esquivel. DEFENDANT'S NoTICH OF EX-PanrE APPLICATION FoR 18 — avenne a oree CONTINUANCE OF DEFAULT PROVE-UP HEARING ‘nas CAL ngOnnse! Kavuingly Guedd Mortyrye Enterprises Ine a fee. Mordsese o + my deeds ected | Vy Bhe. Opproins Whieh is Uar® 2) Eerprise nc. te couse Court + slender my geod Nate « 3 | 32. Because | stand to lose my home due to abusive acts and violation of 4 the Federal Injunction and res judicata, | am requesting that the prove up| | hearing and the Motion to Set Aside and Vacate the MSJ judgment be| 6 | consolidated and heard on the same day as my motion. 7 33. For all the above-and-foregoing reasons, | respectfully request that the| 8 Court grant my application for a continuance of the Plaintiff's prove up| 9) hearing to be consolidated with my motion to vacate the MSJ judgment. wo | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State off 11 | California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was} 2 executed on Thursday, December 2, 2021 at Victorville, California. | Naletie Lopez ~ uy Valerie Lopez, Defendant, in propria persona “t Qisee by eral 2 ox \ Gre Semple Laan PErENDANTS NOTICE OF EX-raRTEArriIGATION FoR — 19 TANCE STEN stick CONTINUANCE OF DEFAULT PROVE-UP HEARING PORN Pte,12/2121, 6:04 AM ‘ATT Yahoo Mal - Valerio Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., RSC Case No, RIC1S08264 - withdrawal eis perdens Valerie Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A,, RSC Case No. RIC1509264 - withdrawal of lis pendens From: Lynette M. Winstor inston@afret.com) To: 2tms@sbeglobalnet Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 10:26 AM PST Good moming Ms. Lopez, ‘As you know 0: represented Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation in the above-referenced litigation whi Judgment sal with Prejudice in favor of defendants. Although you appealed the ci is now complete. During the course ofthe tigation, you is Pendens). Since the action is no longer pending, | am requesting that you volun If you agree to ¢o 80, p and | will prepare the you wil not agree to withdraw the Lis Pendens, | willbe forced to file a motion to expunge the Lis mays’ fees and costs. | trust that we can resolve this expeditiously. | look forward to hearing from you soon. If you have ary questions, | oF at 626-535-1900, Thank you. resulied ina ‘action and of please let me know Pendens and seek at ‘can be reached via er , Respectlly, 4 Lynette Gridiron Winston, Esq. 8 301 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 1100 = Pasadena, California 91101 : i . 4 Telephone: 626-535-1900 eS Fax: 626-577-7764 a \ded only forthe review constitute waiver of Lis Pendens recorded 8-4-15 (01888591). pdf 134.581212/21, 6:04 AM ‘AT&T Yahoo Mal - Valerio Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank, NJ, RSC Case No. RIC*S0E264 - wihdrawal fis pendens