Project:
Project no:
Author:
Project data
Project name
Project number
Author
Description
Date 2/20/2022
Design code EN
Material
Steel S 235
1 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Project item CON1
Design
Name CON1
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Beams and columns
β – Direction γ - Pitch α - Rotation Offset ex Offset ey Offset ez
Name Cross-section Forces in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
C 4 - SHS50/50/4.0 0.0 -90.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
B 5 - SHS50/50/4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
D1 5 - SHS50/50/4.0 0.0 -45.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
D2 5 - SHS50/50/4.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
2 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
3 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material
4 - SHS50/50/4.0 S 235
5 - SHS50/50/4.0 S 235
4 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
4 - SHS50/50/4.0 S 235
5 - SHS50/50/4.0 S 235
Load effects (equilibrium not required)
N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 B -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
D1 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
D2 -4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Welds 13.2 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
GMNA Calculated
5 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
C 4.0 LE1 22.2 0.0 0.0 OK
B 4.0 LE1 31.5 0.0 0.0 OK
D1 4.0 LE1 18.8 0.0 0.0 OK
D2 4.0 LE1 17.0 0.0 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 235 235.0 5.0
Overall check, LE1
6 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Strain check, LE1
Equivalent stress, LE1
7 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Welds (Plastic redistribution)
Throat th. Length σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊ Ut Utc
Item Edge Loads Status
[mm]
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa] [%] [%]
C-w 1 B ◢3.0 170 LE1 27.4 0.0 -7.2 14.8 -3.8 7.6 3.0 OK
C-w 1 D1 ◢3.0 60 LE1 44.5 0.0 7.3 14.2 -21.0 12.4 7.1 OK
B-w 3 D1 ◢3.0 103 LE1 47.6 0.0 11.1 12.7 -23.5 13.2 3.0 OK
C-w 1 D2 ◢3.0 60 LE1 37.7 0.0 -7.3 -11.8 17.8 10.5 6.1 OK
B-w 1 D2 ◢3.0 103 LE1 40.8 0.0 -11.4 10.4 20.1 11.3 2.5 OK
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 235 0.80 360.0 259.2
Detailed result for C-w 1 B
Weld resistance check
(EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
2
σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 360.0 MPa ≥ σw,Ed = [σ⊥
+ 3(τ⊥2 + τ∥2 )]0.5 = 27.4 MPa
σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 = 259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ = 7.2 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
σ ∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σw,Ed ; ) = 7.6 %
w,Rd
σ⊥,Rd
Detailed result for C-w 1 D1
Weld resistance check
(EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
2
σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 360.0 MPa ≥ σw,Ed = [σ⊥
+ 3(τ⊥2 + τ∥2 )]0.5 = 44.5 MPa
σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 = 259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ = 7.3 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
σ ∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σw,Ed ; ) = 12.4 %
w,Rd
σ⊥,Rd
8 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Detailed result for B-w 3 D1
Weld resistance check
(EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =
σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 360.0 MPa ≥ σw,Ed = [σ⊥
⊥ ∥ 47.6 MPa
σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 = 259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ = 11.1 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
) = 13.2 %
Detailed result for C-w 1 D2
Weld resistance check
(EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =
σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 360.0 MPa ≥ σw,Ed = [σ⊥
⊥ ∥ 37.7 MPa
σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 = 259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ = 7.3 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
) = 10.5 %
9 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Detailed result for B-w 1 D2
Weld resistance check
(EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =
σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 360.0 MPa ≥ σw,Ed = [σ⊥
⊥
∥ 40.8 MPa
σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 = 259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ = 11.4 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80 – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
) = 11.3 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Symbol explanation
Symbol Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
σEd Eq. stress
fy Yield strength
εlim Limit of plastic strain
σw,Ed Equivalent stress
σw,Rd Equivalent stress resistance
σ⏊ Perpendicular stress
τ|| Shear stress parallel to weld axis
τ⏊ Shear stress perpendicular to weld axis
0.9 σw,Rd Perpendicular stress resistance - 0.9*fu/γM2
βw Corelation factor EN 1993-1-8 tab. 4.1
Ut Utilization
Utc Weld capacity utilization
Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
10 / 11
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Item Value Unit Reference
γInst 1.20 - EN 1992-4: Table 4.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of mesh size 0.10 -
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.30 - EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.7
Limit plastic strain 0.05 - EN 1993-1-5
Weld stress evaluation Plastic redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Distance between bolts and edge [d] 1.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Concrete breakout resistance check Both EN 1992-4: 7.2.1.4 and 7.2.2.5
Use calculated αb in bearing check. Yes EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.4
Cracked concrete Yes EN 1992-4
Local deformation check No CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Local deformation limit 0.03 - CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Geometrical nonlinearity (GMNA) Yes Analysis with large deformations for hollow section joints
Braced system No EN 1993-1-8: 5.2.2.5
11 / 11
