History of the Quran

History of the Quran is the timeline and origin of the written compilations or manuscripts of the holy book
of Islam, based on historical findings. It spans several centuries, and forms an important major part of the
early history of Islam.

According to the Muslim belief and Islamic scholarly accounts, the revelation of the Qur'an began in 610
CE when the angel Gabriel (believed to have been sent by God) appeared to Muhammad in the cave Hira
near Mecca, reciting to him the first verses of Surah Al-Alaq. Muslims believe that Muhammad continued
to have revelations until his death in 632 CE.[1] According to Islamic tradition, the Qur'an was first
compiled into a book format by Ali ibn Abi Talib. As the Islamic Empire began to grow, and differing
recitations were heard in far-flung areas, the rasm, or consonantal skeleton of the Quran was recompiled for
uniformity in recitation (r. 644–656 CE).[2] under the direction of the third caliph — Uthman ibn Affan. For
this reason, the Qur'an as it exists today is also known as the Uthmanic codex.[3] According to Professor
Francis Edward Peters (1991), what was done to the Quran in the process seems to have been extremely
conservative and the content was formed in a mechanical fashion to avoid redactional bias.[4] Arabic
orthography continued to develop into the second century, allowing qira'at, or variant oral readings of the
rasm, to be documented in Quranic manuscripts.

According to traditional Islamic beliefs, the Quran was revealed to Muhammad, a trader in the Western
Arabian city of Mecca founded by the prophet Abraham (Ibrahim), which had become a sanctuary for
pagan deities and an important trading center. The revelations started one night during the month of
Ramadan in 610 CE, when Muhammad, at the age of forty, received the first visit from the angel Gabriel.[5]

The Quran uses the term ummi to describe Muhammad. The

majority of Muslim scholars interpret this word as a reference to an
illiterate individual, though some modern scholars instead interpret
it as a reference to those who belong to a community without a
scripture.[6][7]

According to the famous Sunni collector of traditions of

Muhammad, Muhammad al-Bukhari (who lived about 250 years
after Muhammad), Muhammad's wife Khadija bint Khuwaylid
Quran
described that the first Quranic revelation occurred when the angel
Gabriel visited Muhammad and asked him to recite. Muhammad
responded ma ana bīqāre'u, which could be translated into a number of ways: 'I do not read' or 'what am I
to read/recite?' or 'I will not read/recite'. Gabriel pressed him "until all the strength went out of me;
thereupon he released me and said: 'Read!'" This was repeated three times and upon the third, Gabriel
released him and said, "Read in the name of the Sustainer who created humankind from a clot! Read! And
your Sustainer is the most Beautiful."[8]: 39–41 After this Muhammad continued to have revelations
sporadically over a period of twenty-three years, until shortly before his death in 11/632.[8]: 45

Muslims believe that Gabriel brought the word of God to Muhammad verbatim, and the Quran was
divinely protected from any alteration or change. The Quran emphasizes that Muhammad was required
only to receive the sacred text and that he had no authority to change it.[9] It is also believed that God did
not make himself known through the revelations; it was his will that was revealed.

According to tradition, Muhammad described the experience of revelation:

 "Sometimes it is revealed like the ringing of a bell. This form of inspiration is the hardest of
them all and then it passes off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel
comes in the form of a man and talks to me and I grasp whatever he says."[8]: 43

At times, it was also reported that the experience was painful for Muhammad. For example, he had been
heard saying, "Never once did I receive a revelation without thinking that my soul had been torn away
from me."[8]: 43

After Muhammad would receive revelations, he would later recite it to his Companions, who also
memorized it or wrote it down. Before the Quran was commonly available in written form, speaking it from
memory prevailed as the mode of teaching it to others. The practice of memorizing the whole Quran is still
practised among Muslims. Millions of people have memorized the entire Quran in Arabic. This fact, taken
in the context of 7th-century Arabia, was not an extraordinary feat. People of that time had a penchant for
recited poetry and had developed their skills in memorization to a remarkable degree. Events and
competitions that featured the recitation of elaborate poetry were of great interest.[10]

Non-Muslim people questioned the nature and modes of Muhammad's revelations. The Meccans
interpreted the Quranic revelations based on their understanding of 'inspiration'. For them, poetry was
closely connected to inspiration from a higher spiritual source. For this reason when Muhammad began
preaching and reciting the Quran, the Meccans accused him of being a poet[11] or a "poet
possessed".[12][13]

Due to the fact that the Quran was revealed in disjointed verses and chapters, a point came when it needed
to be gathered into a coherent whole text. There are disagreements among both Muslim and non-Muslim
scholars as to when the Quran was first compiled. A hadith in Sahih al-Bukhari states that the caliph Abu
Bakr commanded Zayd ibn Thabit to compile the written Quran, relying upon both textual fragments and
the memories of those who had memorized it.[14][15] Some Shia Muslims believe that Ali ibn Abi Talib
was the first to compile the Quran into one written text, a task completed shortly after the death of
Muhammad[16]

Contents
Muhammad
Abu Bakr
Uthman ibn Affan and the canonization
Ali ibn Abi Talib
View of non-Muslim scholarship
Textual criticism
Differences and similarities with the Bible
Similarities with Apocryphal legends
Varying codices and the start of the canonization
ʿAbdullah ibn Masʿud's codex
Ubay ibn Ka'b's codex
Early manuscripts to the final canonical text
Umayyad Period (44/661–132/750) – Hijazi script
Abbasid Period (132/750–640/1258)
Early Abbasid Style
 New Abbasid Style
1924 Cairo edition
Completeness
Islamic sources
Islamic view: Sunni and Shia
Manuscripts
See also
Notes
References
Citations
Bibliography
Further reading
External links

Muhammad
In Pre-Islamic Arabia, the society during the time of Muhammad was predominantly oral, and for this
reason he would recite the Quranic verses to his Companions for them to memorize. Therefore, it is
unknown whether the Quran was ever written and collected during the time of Muhammad. While writing
was not a common skill during Muhammad's time, Mecca, being a commercial center, had a number of
people who could write. Some scholars believe that several scribes including Zayd ibn Thabit and Ubay
ibn Ka'b recorded verses of the Quran. This provides an explanation as to how the Quran existed in written
form during the life of Muhammad, even if it was not compiled into one text.[8]: 83 According to one
source, sira (prophetic biography) of Muhammad list the following as scribes of the Quran: Abu Bakr al-
Siddeeq, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab, ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, al-Zubayr ibn al-‘Awwaam,
‘Aamir ibn Fuhayrah, ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas, Ubayy ibn Ka’b, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn al-Arqam, Thaabit ibn Qays ibn
Shammaas, Hanzalah ibn al-Rabee’ al-Usaydi, al-Mugheerah ibn Shu’bah, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Rawaahah,
Khaalid ibn al-Waleed, Khaalid ibn Sa’eed ibn al-‘Aas (whom it was said was the first one to write down
anything for him), Mu’aawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan and Zayd ibn Thaabit.[17]

Sunni and Shia Muslim scholars generally believe that the Quran was written down in its entirety at the
time of Muhammad's death. Muhammad's cousin, Ibn Abbas, describes the way in which the final version
of the Quran was fixed: "the prophet recited the book before Gabriel every year in the month of Ramadan,
and in the month in which he died he recited it before him twice."[18] It is believed that the term "reciting
the Quran twice" means compiling all the Quranic revelations into a complete and final version. It is
understood that toward the end of Muhammad's life a special act of revelation occurred in which a final and
complete version of the Quran was created. The term 'recite', which is used here, is referring to the custom
where a Quranic scholar recites the entire Quran from beginning to end a number of times before a senior
scholar. According to this tradition the act of recital is being performed by Muhammad, with the angel
Gabriel playing the role of superior authority.[19]

In one of the hadith Muhammad is recorded as saying: "I leave among you two things of high estimation:
the Book of God and my Family."[20] Some scholars argue that this provides evidence that the Quran had
been collected and written during this time because it is not correct to call something al-kitab (book) when
it is merely in the [people's] memories. The word al-kitab signifies a single and united entity and does not
apply to a text which is scattered and not collected.[21] However, Alan Jones has explored the use of this
word in the Quran, finding that there is no evidence that it was used in such a "concrete sense" in reference
to the Quran and other scriptures, but instead evidence points to an "abstract meaning". He further
considers the role of writing among Arabs in the early seventh century and accounts in the Sira of the
dictation of parts of the Quran to scribes towards the end of the Medinan period.[22]

Another argument some Shia and Sunni scholars bring up is the importance that Muhammad attached to the
Quran. They believe that since Muhammad put so much importance to the Quran he had to have ordered
the writing of it during his lifetime. For example, Zayd ibn Thabit reported, "We used to record the Quran
from parchments in the presence of the Messenger of God."[23]

Some authors believe that, as long as Muhammad was alive, there was always the expectation of further
revelation as well as occasional abrogations. Any formal collection of the material already revealed could
not properly be considered a complete text.[24]

Abu Bakr
According to Sunni scholars, during the life of Muhammad parts of the Quran, though written, were
scattered among his companions, much of it as private possession.[25] The number of scribes was 43
companions. And there were many people who though were not scribes also were complete memorizers.
After Muhammad's death, Abu Bakr initially exercised a policy of laissez faire as well. This policy was
reversed after the Battle of Yamama in 633.[26][27] During the battle, 70 Muslims who had memorized the
Quran were killed.[28][29] The death of Salim, however, was most significant, as he was one of the very
few who had been entrusted by Muhammad to teach the Quran. Consequently, upon Umar's insistence,
Abu Bakr ordered the collection of the hitherto scattered pieces of the Quran into one copy.[26][30]

Zayd ibn Thabit, Muhammad's primary scribe, was assigned the duty of gathering all of the Quranic text.
He gives an insight into what happened during the meeting between Abu Bakr, Umar, and himself:

" Abu Bakr sent for me at a time when the Yamama battles had witnessed the martyrdom
of numerous Companions. I found 'Umar bin al-Khattab with him. Abu Bakr began, Umar
has just come to me and said, 'In the Yamama battles death has dealt most severely with
the qurra',[Reciters of the Quran] and I fear it will deal with them with equal severity in
other theatres of war. As a result much of the Quran will be gone. " 'I am therefore of the
opinion that you should command the Quran be collected.'" Abu Bakr continued, "I said to
'Umar, 'How can we embark on what the Prophet never did?' 'Umar replied that it was a
good deed regardless, and he did not cease replying to my scruples until Allah reconciled
me to the undertaking, and I became of the same mind as him. Zaid, you are young and
intelligent, you used to record the revelations for Muhammad, and we know nothing to your
discredit. So pursue the Quran and collect it together." By Allah, had they asked me to
move a mountain it could not have been weightier than what they requested of me now".
(Al-Bukhari, Sahih, Jam'i al-Qur'an, hadith no. 4986; see also Ibn Abu Dawud, al-Masahif,
pp. 6-9)

His reaction to the task and its difficulties are further explained:

"...By Allah, if he (Abu Bakr) had ordered me to shift one of the mountains it would not
have been harder for me than what he had ordered me concerning the collection of the
Quran... So I started locating the Quranic material and collecting it from parchments,
scapula, leafstalks of date palms and from the memories of men. [Bukhari Sahih al-
Bukhari, 6:60:201 (https://web.archive.org/web/19700101010101/http://cmje.usc.edu/religi
ous-texts/hadith/bukhari/060-sbt.php#006.060.201)]

Al-Zarakhsi comments,[31]
 What Zaid means in fact is that he sought out verses from scattered sources, to collate
them against the recollections of the huffaz. In this way everyone participated in the
collection process. No one possessing any portion of it was left out, and so no one had
reason for expressing concern about the verses collected, nor could anyone complain that
the text had been gathered from only a select few.[31]

Zayd also said:

"So I started looking for the Holy quran and collected it from (what was written on) palm-
leaf stalks, thin white stones, and also from men who knew it by heart, until I found the last
verse of Surat at-Tauba (repentance) with Abi Khuzaima al-Ansari, and I did not find it with
anybody other than him. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, p. 478).[32]

Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani draws special attention to Zayd's statement, "I found two verses of Sura al-Bara'a
with Abu Khuzaima al-Ansari," as demonstrating that Zayd's own writings and memorization were not
deemed sufficient. Everything required verification.[31] Ibn Hajar further comments:

Abu Bakr had not authorized him to record except what was already available [on
parchment]. That is why Zaid refrained from including the final ayah of Sura Bara'a until he
came upon it in written form, even though he and his fellow Companions could recall it
perfectly well from memory.[31]

The task required Zayd ibn Thabit to collect written copies of the Quran, with each verse having been
validated with the oral testimony of at least two companions. The Quran was collected under the auspices
of committee of four senior ranking Companions headed by Zayd ibn Thabit.[33] This compilation was
kept by the Caliph Abu Bakr, after his death by his successor, Caliph Umar, who on his deathbed gave
them to Hafsa bint Umar, his daughter and one of Muhammad's widows.[27]

Sunnis dismiss the Shia version of the Quranic compilation as nothing more than Twelver Shia fabrications.
They point to the fact that Zaydi Shias who form the oldest living Shia sect believe in the above events
described in Sahih Bukhari.[34]

The famous ten People who form the chains of narration regarding the Quran are as follows.

Umar ibn al Khattab[35]

Uthman bin Affan[36]
Ali ibn abi Talib[37]
Abu Musa al Ash'ari[38]
Ubay Ibn Ka'b[39]
Abdullah ibn Masood[40]
Zayd Ibn Thabit[41]
Abu Hurairah[42]
Abdullah Ibn Abbas[43]
Abu al-Darda[44]

Of those ten, the two most important people were Zayd ibn Thabit the personal scribe of Muhammad and
Ubay ibn Ka'b who was the foremost authority on the Quran after Zaid.[45][46]

Uthman ibn Affan and the canonization

According to Islamic tradition, the process of canonization ended under the third caliph, Uthman ibn Affan
(r. 23/644–35/655), about twenty years after the death of Muhammad in 650 CE, though date is not exact
because it was not recorded by early Arab annalists.[47] The Qur'anic canon is the form of the Quran as
recited and written in which it is religiously binding for the Muslim community. This canonical corpus is
closed and fixed in the sense that nothing in the Quran can be changed or modified.[48]

By the time of Uthman's caliphate, there was a perceived need for clarification of Qur'an reading. The
Caliphate had grown considerably, expanding into Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and Iran, bringing into Islam's fold
many new converts from various cultures with varying degrees of isolation.[49] These converts spoke a
variety of languages but were not well learned in Arabic, and so Uthman felt it was important to
standardize the written text of the Quran into one specific Arabic dialect. Another reason for compiling the
Quran was that many Muslims who had memorized the Quran in its entirety (huffaz) were dying, especially
in battle.[50]

According to the dominant version narrated by Bukhari, the reason for the final collection of the Quran was
a dispute between Muslim forces from Iraq and Syria over the correct way of reciting it during communal
prayers while on an expedition to Armenia and Azerbaijan.

It is believed that the general Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman reported this problem to the caliph and asked him to
establish a unified text. According to the history of al-Tabari, during the expedition there were 10,000
Kufan warriors, 6,000 in Azerbaijan and 4,000 at Rayy.[51] A large number of soldiers disagreeing about
the correct way of reciting the Quran may have caused Hudhayfah to promote a unified text. An example
of the confusion at this time is seen during a campaign in Tabaristan, where one of the soldiers asked
Hudhayfah, "How did the Messenger of God pray?" Hudhayfah told him the soldier prayed before
fighting.[52]

It is believed upon Hudhayfah's request Uthman obtained the sheets of the Quran from Ḥafṣa and
appointed a commission consisting of Zayd and three prominent Meccans, and instructed them to copy the
sheets into several volumes based on the dialect of Quraysh, the main tribe of Mecca.[53]

The story including Uthman's reaction is recorded in the following:

Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the
people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid
of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said
to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book
(Quran) as Jews and the Christians did before." So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa
saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic
materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to Uthman.
Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, Abdullah bin Az Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur
Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said
to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the
Quran, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Quran was revealed in their tongue." They
did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts
to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and
ordered that all the other Quranic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or
whole copies, be burnt. Zayd bin Thabit added, "A Verse from Surat Ahzab was missed by
me when we copied the Quran and I used to hear Allah's Apostle reciting it. So we
searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari. [That verse was]: 'Among
the Believers are men who have been true in their covenant with Allah.'"[Quran 33:23 (https://
www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2002.02.0006%3Asura%3D33%3Averse%3D2
3)] [54][55]
When the task was finished Uthman kept one copy in Medina and sent others to Kufa, Baṣra, Damascus,
and, according to some accounts, Mecca, and ordered that all other variant copies of the Quran be
destroyed. This was done everywhere except in Kufa, where some scholars argue that Ibn Masʿūd and his
followers refused.[53]

The above quoted hadith refers to the manuscripts of the Quran compiled during the time of Caliph Abu
Bakr, which were inherited by Caliph Umar's daughter Hafsa, a wife of Muhammad, and then returned to
her, as promised. Sean Anthony and Catherine Bronson note that "Zuhrī—the earliest known scholar to
emphasize the importance of Ḥafṣah’s codex for the collection of the caliph ʿUthmān’s recension—also
serves as the authority for the accounts of the destruction of Ḥafṣah’s scrolls (ṣuḥuf)." After her death, he
reported that Hafsa's brother inherited the manuscripts and allowed Uthman or according to some versions,
Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan to destroy them.[56]

It is generally accepted that the Uthmanic text comprises all 114 suras in the order known today.[48]

Beliefs of Shia Muslim about the origins of the Quran may differ in some respects from Sunni beliefs.
According to influential Marja' Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei, Uthman's collection of the Quran was
metaphorical, not physical. He did not collect the verses and suras in one volume, but in the sense that he
united the Muslims on the reading of one authoritative recension. al-Khoei also argues that the one reading
on which Uthman united the Muslims was the one in circulation among most Muslims, and that it reached
them through uninterrupted transmission from Muhammad.[57]

This is one of the most contested issues and an area where many non-Muslim and Muslim scholars often
clash.[48]

Ali ibn Abi Talib

Some Shia scholars believe that Ali ibn Abi Talib possessed a personal apograph of the Quran, which he
collected six months after Muhammad's death, and that this was the first compilation of the Quran. The
unique aspect about this version is that it was collected in the order it was sent,[58] which mainstream
Shi'ites hold is the only difference between the Quran as known today and Ali's.[8]: 89–90

A few Shia scholars argue that Ali presented his Quran to the community, but they refused to acknowledge
his copy. One report states, "he had brought the complete Book [of God], comprising the interpretation and
the revelation, the precise and ambiguous verses, the abrogating and the abrogated verses; nothing was
missing from it, [not even] a letter alif, nor lam. But they did not accept it from him"[59] They also believe
that Ali's version of the Quran contained verses that are not seen in the Uthmanic codex we have today.
They believe changes in the order of verses and suras did take place and that there were variant readings,
tabdil, exchange of words such as umma to imma, rearrangement of words and deletion of words
pertaining to the right of Ali being the first caliph.[60]

The contemporary Shia scholar Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei provides a counter argument to this belief. He
states that even if Ali's Quran incorporated additions that are not part of the existing Quran, this does not
mean that these additions comprised parts of the Quran and have been dropped from it due to alteration.
Rather, these additions were interpretations or explanations of what God was saying, or were in the form of
revelations from God, explaining the intention of the verses in the Quran. These additions are not part of
the standard Quran and not considered part of what the Muslim Messenger of God was commanded to
convey to his community.[61]

View of non-Muslim scholarship

The origin of the Quran has been a subject of sustained academic research.[62] There have also been a
number of proposals for refinement of the traditional view and even its fundamental re-evaluation.[62]

Until around the 1970s, non-Muslim scholars—while not accepting the divinity of the Quran—did accept
its Islamic origin story.[63] Ernest Renan famously declared that "Islam was born, not amid the mystery
which cradles the origins of other religions, but rather in the full light of history"[64]—an empire ruling in
the name of the religion of Islam and whose expansion was fuelled by religious fervor, and which presided
over the compilation, editing, approving and distributing of the holy book of that religion (the Quran).
[Note 1]

But in the 1970s revisionist historians began to question Islamic "literary sources"[65] — tafsir or
commentaries on the Quran,[66] hadith, or accounts of what the Islamic prophet Muhammad approved of or
didn't, and sira, biography of the prophet — upon which the traditional account of the Quran were based.
They employed a "source-critical" approach to this literature, including as evidence relevant archaeology,
epigraphy, numismatics, and contemporary non-Arabic literature,[65] that they argued provided "hard facts"
and an ability to crosscheck.[67]

By 2008, Fred Donner was summarizing the state of the field in the following terms:[68]

Qur'anic studies, as a field of academic research, appears today to be in a state of disarray.

Those of us who study Islam's origins have to admit collectively that we simply do not know
some very basic things about the Qur'an – things so basic that the knowledge of them is
usually taken for granted by scholars dealing with other texts. They include such questions as:
How did the Qur'an originate? Where did it come from, and when did it first appear? How
was it first written? In what kind of language was – is – it written? What form did it first take?
Who constituted its first audience? How was it transmitted from one generation to another,
especially in its early years? When, how, and by whom was it codified? Those familiar with
the Qur'an and the scholarship on it will know that to ask even one of these questions
immediately plunges us into realms of grave uncertainty and has the potential to spark intense
debate. To put it another way, on these basic issues there is little consensus even among the
well-trained scholars who work on them.

Islamic historians Patricia Crone, Michael Cook, John Wansbrough, and archaeologist Yehuda D. Nevo all
argue that all the primary Islamic historical sources which exist are from 150 to 300 years after the events
which they describe, leaving several generations for events to be forgotten, misinterpreted, distorted,
garbled, etc.[69][70][71] They contend that Islam was formed gradually over a number of centuries after the
Muslim conquests, as the Islamic conquerors elaborated and backdated their beliefs and history in response
to Jewish and Christian challenges.[72]

In 1999, Cook and Crone argued that "there is no hard evidence for the existence of the Koran in any form
before the last decade of the seventh century."[73] Partial Quranic manuscripts such as the Sanaa manuscript
and the Birmingham Quran manuscript, which have been carbon-dated back to the early seventh century,
were discovered later.

Author Journalist and scholar Toby Lester notes the Quran "assumes a familiarity with language, stories,
and events that seem to have been lost even to the earliest of Muslim exegetes".[74] Cook and Christopher
Rose note the Quran contains obscure words and phrases, "mystery letters," or Muqattaʿat—groups of
between one and four letters that do not form words and begin about one quarter of surahs of the Quran,
and the "Sabians" religious group unknown to historians.[75][76] Cook argue that "someone must once
have known" what these mean, and that their meaning was forgotten now suggests the Quran may have
been "off the scene for several decades".[77]
There is no mention of the "Quran" nor "Islam",[78] nor "rightly guided caliphs", nor any of the famous
futūḥ battles by Christian Byzantines in their historical records describing the Arab invaders advance,
leaders or religion; the lack of any surviving documents by those Arabs who "lived through the
establishment of the Caliphate";[79] the fact that coins of the region and era did not use Islamic iconography
until sometime after 685 CE.[80][81] Evidence to suggest there was a break in the transmission of the
knowledge of the meaning of much of the Quran not accounted for by Islamic historical tradition, a break
somewhere after the time of the Quran's revelation and before its earliest commentators, includes the
"mystery letters" and unintelligible words and phrases.

According to tradition, the Quran was composed in the early 7th century CE, but according to historian
Tom Holland, "only in the 690's did a Caliph finally get around to inscribing the Prophet's name on a
public monument; only decades after that did the first tentative references to him start to appear in private
inscriptions".[79]

Regarding the collection and editing of the Quran into a book (Mus'haf), historian Michael Cook writes that
while there is "more or less" common ground among hadith, aka traditions that Muhammad did not do it
but that this task was completed by the end of the reign of Caliph Uthman. Otherwise hadith do not agree:

We learn that some of Muhammad's followers already knew the whole Quran by heart in his
lifetime -- yet subsequently it had to pieced together out of fragments collected from here and
there. We are told that Muhammad regularly dictated his revelations to a scribe -- yet the
scripture was later in danger of being lost through the death in battle of those who had it by
heart. It was collected and made into a book by the first Caliph; or by the second; or by the
third, Uthman. Alternatively, it had already been collected before the time of Uthman, and he
merely had the text standarised and other versions destroyed. The last of these traditions has
tended to prevail, but the choice is a somewhat arbitrary one ...[82]

The accounts of non-Muslim conquered peoples also conflict with the accounts of traditional Islamic
literature. Examining 7th century Byzantine Christian sources commentary on the Arab "immigrants"
(Mhaggraye) who were invading and settling in formerly Byzantine territory at that time, historian Abdul-
Massih Saadi found the Christians never mentioned the terms "Quran" nor "Islam" nor that the immigrants
were of a new religion.[78][Note 2] They referred to the immigrants in ethnic terms -- "among them (Arabs)
there are many Christians...".[83] The Christians used secular or political, not religious terms (kings, princes,
rulers) to refer to the Arab leaders. Muhammad was "the first king of the Mhaggraye", also guide, teacher,
leader or great ruler. They did however mention the religion of the Arabs. The immigrants' religion was
described as monotheist "in accordance with the Old Law (Old Testament)".[78] When the Emir of the
immigrants and Patriarch of the local Christians did have a religious colloquium there was much discussion
of the scriptures but no mention of the Quran, "a possible indication that the Quran was not yet in
circulation."[78] The Christians reported the Emir was accompanied by "learned Jews", that the immigrants
"accepted the Torah just as the Jews and Samaritans", though none of the sources described the immigrants
as Jews.[78]

Wansbrough's students Crone and Cook co-authored a book called Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic
World (1977). Crone, Wansbrough, and Nevo argue that all the primary sources which exist are from 150–
300 years after the events which they describe, and thus are chronologically far removed from those
events.[84][85][71]

Support for the traditional Islamic narrative

Not all scholars question the sacred history of the Quran. Emran El-Badawi writes, "the opening chapters
of Fred Donner's Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing claims to
refute the theoretical and methodological flaws of the skeptical school and instead dates the composition of
the Quran, as a closed canon, to an Arabian context of early believers preceding ... the first civil war in
656."[86][87] Donner's perspective now represents mainstream scholarly opinion.[88]

The datings in 2015 of the Birmingham Manuscripts lead Joseph E. B. Lumbard, a convert to Islam and
associate professor of Quranic studies at the College of Islamic Studies at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in
Qatar, to comment:[89]

These recent empirical findings are of fundamental importance. They establish that as regards
the broad outlines of the history of the compilation and codification of the Quranic text, the
classical Islamic sources are far more reliable than had hitherto been assumed. Such findings
thus render the vast majority of Western revisionist theories regarding the historical origins of
the Quran untenable.[90]

In dating of the text, the Dome of the Rock inscriptions, which

have been known for over a century, are significant. The inner face
of the octagon include the declaration of faith and verses describing
the powers of God. Next Muhammad is introduced, with a blessing
that, though uncited in the Quran, was already in use in 694. Then
Christians are preached about the prophet-hood and mortality of
Jesus, followed by the claim that God is sufficient unto Himself. At
the end, people are commanded to bend to His will and punishment
is threatened otherwise.[91] Dome of the Rock. The structure, the
oldest extant example of early
The absence of contemporaneous corroborating material from the Islamic architecture, was completed
very first century of Islam has raised numerous questions as to the in 691
authenticity of the account provided by later traditionalist sources.
All that is preserved from this time period are a few
commemorative building inscriptions and assorted coins.[92] However, some scholars deny such a
belittlement of key sources from the era. Besides the Dome of the Rock inscriptions mentioned above, there
are also brief Quranic passages on coins issued from the time of Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan (697-750).
These passages include the shahadah, verses 112:1-3 or -4 complete except for the initial basmallah and the
introductory word "say", and part of 9:33, but with some variations: "He sent him with the guidance and
the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion..." Similar to the contemporary
inscriptions at the Dome of the Rock these portions are clearly intended to declare the primacy of the new
religion of Islam over Christianity, in particular.[91]

Skeptical scholars, nonetheless, point out that the earliest account of Muhammad's life by Ibn Ishaq was
written about a century after Muhammad died and all later narratives by Islamic biographers contain far
more details and embellishments about events which are entirely lacking in Ibn Ishaq's text.[93]

Patricia Crone, studying the origins of the Quran, has focused on the examination of the vast body of the
Greek, Armenian, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, and Coptic accounts of non-Muslim neighbours of the 7th
and 8th centuries which in many cases contradict the traditional Islamic narratives. She argues that the
consistency of the non-Muslim sources spread over a large geographic area would tend to rule out a non-
Muslim anti-Islamic motive to these sources.[94]
The sceptic approach has been further expanded by Christoph Luxenberg, who supports claims for a late
composition of the Quran, and traces much of it to sources other than Muhammad. Luxenberg is known for
his thesis that the Quran is merely a re-working of an earlier Christian text, a Syriac lectionary.[95] Gerd R.
Puin, has similar views about Alexander the Great in the Quran.

Fred Donner has argued for an early date for the collection of the Quran, based on his reading of the text
itself. He points out that if the Quran had been collected over the tumultuous early centuries of Islam, with
their vast conquests and expansion and bloody incidents between rivals for the caliphate, there would have
been some evidence of this history in the text. However, there is nothing in the Quran that does not reflect
what is known of the earliest Muslim community.[96]

In 1972, during the restoration of the Great Mosque of San'a in Yemen, labourers stumbled upon a "paper
grave" containing tens of thousands of fragments of parchment on which verses of the Quran were written.
Some of these fragments were believed to be the oldest Quranic texts yet found.[97]

The latest in origin of the Quran is the discovery of parchments of Quranic text by the University of
Birmingham, the parchment material has been radiocarbon dated to the period between 568 and 645 with
95.4% accuracy. The test was carried out in a laboratory at the University of Oxford. The result places the
parchment close to the time of Muhammad, who is generally thought to have lived between 570 and 632.
Researchers conclude that the parchment is among the earliest written textual evidence of the Quran in
existence.[98]

Textual criticism

In the 1970s, what has been described as a "wave of sceptical

scholars" challenged a great deal of the received wisdom in Islamic
studies.[99]: 23 They argued that the Islamic historical tradition had
been greatly corrupted in transmission. They tried to correct or
reconstruct the early history of Islam from other, presumably more
reliable, sources such as coins, inscriptions, and non-Islamic sources.
The oldest of this group was John Wansbrough (1928–2002).
Wansbrough's works were widely noted, but perhaps not widely
read.[99]: 38 In 1972 a cache of ancient Qur'ans in a mosque in Sana'a,
Yemen was discovered – commonly known as the Sana'a manuscripts.
The German scholar Gerd R. Puin and his research team, who
investigated these Quran fragments for many years, made
approximately 35,000 microfilm photographs of the manuscripts,
which he dated to early part of the 8th century. Puin has not published The right page of the Stanford '07
the entirety of his work, but noted unconventional verse orderings, binary manuscript. The upper
minor textual variations, and rare styles of orthography. He also layer is the verses 265-271 of the
suggested that some of the parchments were palimpsests which had surah Bakara. The double layer
been reused. Puin believed that this implied an evolving text as reveals the additions made on the
opposed to a fixed one.[100] Keith Small, in Textual Criticism and first text of the Quran and the
Qur’ān Manuscripts, has concluded that it is not possible to develop a differences with today's Koran.
reliable critical text of the Quran based on the sources currently
available.[101] The Corpus Coranicum project is an ongoing effort to
develop a critical edition of the Quran.

Differences and similarities with the Bible

Skeptical scholars account for the many similarities between the Quran and the Jewish and Hebrew
Scriptures by saying that Muhammad was teaching what he believed to be a universal history, as he had
heard it from the Jews and Christians he had encountered in Arabia and on his travels - as well as his
exposure to the Hanif tradition by way of his paternal-grandfather, Abdul Muttalib. These scholars also
disagree with the Islamic belief that the whole of the Quran is addressed by God to humankind. They note
that there are numerous passages where God is directly addressed, or mentioned in the third person, or
where the narrator swears by various entities, including God.[102] The Quranic account, however, differs
significantly regarding the crucifixion and death of Jesus.[103][104]

Similarities with Apocryphal legends

Aside from the Bible, Quran relies on several Apocryphal and legendary
sources, like the Protoevangelium of James,[106] Gospel of Pseudo-
Matthew,[106] and several infancy gospels.[107] Several narratives rely on
Jewish Midrash Tanhuma legends, like the narrative of Cain learning to bury
the body of Abel in Surah 5:31.[108][109]

Varying codices and the start of the

canonization
Before Uthman established the canon of the Quran, there may have been
One of the verses
different versions or codices in complete state, though none has yet been
subject to scientific
discovered. Such codices as may exist never gained general approval and were
claims, as fresh dates
viewed by Muslims as individuals' personal copies.[8]: 93 With respect to
miraculously facilitate
birth; Mary shakes the
partial codices, there is opinion that "the search for variants in the partial
date tree for fresh dates, versions extant before the Caliph Uthman's alleged recension in the 640s has
The myth described in not yielded any differences of great significance".[110] The two most
the Gospel of Pseudo- influential codices at this time are ʿAbdullah ibn Masʿud's and Ubayy ibn
Matthew[105] also Kaʿb's. Al-Qurazi recounted seeing the mushafs used by Ibn Mas'ud, Ubayy,
repeated in the Quran. and Zaid b. Thabit and finding no differences between them.[111]

ʿAbdullah ibn Masʿud's codex

The most influential of the allegedly varying codices was that of ʿAbdullah ibn Masʿud, an early convert
who became a personal servant to Muhammad. It is reported that he learned around seventy suras directly
from Muhammad, who appointed him as one of the first teachers of Quranic recitation. Later he was
appointed to an administrative post in Kufa by the caliph ʿUmar, where he became a leading authority on
the Quran and Sunnah. Some sources suggest that Ibn Masʿud refused to destroy his copy of the Quran or
to stop teaching it when the ʿUthmanic codex was made official.[53]

There are two points on which Ibn Masʿud's version is alleged to differ from the ʿUthmanic text: the order
of the suras and some variants in the readings. Muhammad Mustafa Al-A'zami lists three reports
concerning the omission of three suras, (Al-Fatiha and Al-Mu'awwidhatayn, the two short suras with which
the Quran ends (Suras 113 and 114)), he then states that "early scholars such as al-Nawawi and Ibn Hazm
denounced these reports as lies fathered upon Ibn Mas'ud."[112] Most of the other differences involve only
altered vowels with the same consonantal text, which caused variations in recitation.[53] Dr. Ramon Harvey
notes that Ibn Masʿūd's reading continued in use, and was even taught as the dominant reading in Kufa for
at least a century after his death, in a paper discussing how some of his distinctive readings continued to
play a role in Hanafi fiqh.[113]
Ubay ibn Ka'b's codex

The second most influential codex was that of Ubay ibn Ka'b, a Medinan Muslim who served as a
secretary for Muhammad. It is believed that he may have been more prominent as a Quranic specialist than
Ibn Masʿud during Muḥammad's lifetime. There are reports that he was responsible for memorizing certain
important revelations on legal matters, which from time to time Muhammad asked him to recite. In a few
hadiths, Ubay is seen in a variety of roles. For instance, the "sheets" of Ubay are sometimes mentioned in
some instances instead of those of Ḥafsa, and sometimes he is also mentioned in some hadiths instead of
Zayd, dictating the Quran to scribes.

His version of the Quran is said to have included two short suras not in the Uthmanic or Ibn Masʿud texts:
Sūrat al-Khal, with three verses, and Sūrat al-Ḥafd, with six. Professor Sean Anthony has discussed the
textual history of these two surahs in detail and noted that their presence in mushafs modelled after Ubayy's
(and to a lesser extent, certain other companions) is "robustly represented in our earliest and best sources".
While we lack material evidence in the form of manuscripts, he notes that many of the Muslim sources
make direct material observations of the surahs in such mushafs.[114] The order of suras in Ubayy's codex
is said to have differed from that of Uthman's and Ibn Masʿud's as well,[53] although these are structural
differences rather than textual variations. The surah order of the lower text of the early seventh century
Ṣanʽā’ 1 palimpsest is known to have similarities with that reported of Ubayy (and to a lesser extent, that of
Ibn Mas'ud).[115]

The first sura, entitled al-Khal ("separation"), is translated as: "O Allah, we seek your help and ask your
forgiveness, and we praise you and we do not disbelieve in you. We separate from and leave him who sins
against you."

The second sura, entitled al-Hafd ("haste"), is translated as: "O Allah, we worship You and to You we pray
and prostrate and to You we run and hasten to serve You. We hope for Your mercy and we fear Your
punishment. Your punishment will certainly reach the disbelievers." These two pieces are said to constitute
qunut (that is, supplications which Muhammad sometimes made in morning prayer or in witr prayer after
recitation of suras from the Quran). They are in fact identical to some parts of qunut reported in the
collections of hadiths. (See Nawawi, al-adhkar, Cairo, 1955, pp. 57–58.)

The single additional so-called aya is translated: "If the son of Adam were given a valley full of riches, he
would wish a second one; and if he were given two valleys full of riches, he would surely ask for a third.
Nothing will fill the belly of the son of Adam except dust, and Allah is forgiving to him who is repentant."
This text is known to be a hadith from Muhammad. (Bukhari, VIII, No. 444-47.) According to Ibn 'Abbas
(No. 445) and 'Ubay (No. 446) this text was at times thought to be part of the Quran. However, Ubay
himself clarifies that after sura 102: "I had been revealed, [the sahaba] did not consider the above to be part
of the Quran." (Bukhari, VIII, No. 446.)

This explanation of Ubay also makes it very clear that the companions of Mohammad did not differ at all
about what was part of the Quran and what was not part of the Quran when the revelation had ceased. It is
also important to note that the hadith appeared in the mushaf of Ubay because it was for his own personal
use; that is, in his private notebook, where he did not always distinguish between Quranic material and
hadith, since the notebook was not meant for public use and he himself knew well what to make of his own
notes. All companions of Mohammad are said to have had their own copies of the Quran, with notes, for
personal use.

The Islamic reports of these copies of the Quran of the companions of Mohammad only tell of various
differences according to reports that reached them (e.g., the hadith in Bukhari, VIII, No. 446, that Ubay at
some early stage held this sentence to be part of the Quran). However, the tangible manuscripts of these
copies of the Quran have not survived but were destroyed, having been considered obsolete.[116]
Early manuscripts to the final canonical text
After Uthman had the other codices destroyed there were still variations in the reading and the text of this
Quran. However, scholars deny the possibility of great changes of the text arguing that addition,
suppression or alteration would have led to controversy 'of which there is little trace'. They further state that
even though Uthman became unpopular among Muslims, he was not charged with alteration or mutilation
of the Quran in general.[117]

During the manuscript age, the Quran was the most copied Arabic text. It was believed that copying the
Quran would bring blessings on the scribe and the owner.[118]

The Arabic script as we know it today was unknown in Muhammad's time (as Arabic writing styles have
progressed through time) and the Quran was preserved through memorization and written references on
different materials. As Arab society started to evolve into using writing more regularly, writing skills
evolved accordingly. Early Quranic Arabic was written in a rasm which lacked precision because
distinguishing between consonants was impossible due to the absence of diacritical marks (a'jam).
Vowelling marks (tashkil) to indicate prolongation or vowels were absent as well. Due to this there were
endless possibilities for the mispronunciation of the word. The Arabic script as we know it today, the
scripta plena, which has pointed texts and is fully vowelled was not perfected until the middle of the 9th
century.[8]: 92

Umayyad Period (44/661–132/750) – Hijazi script

The earliest known manuscripts of the Quran are collectively called the Hijazi script, and are mostly
associated with the Umayyad period.[118]

Most of the fundamental reform to the manuscripts of the Quran took place under Abd al-Malik, the fifth
Umayyad caliph (65/685–86/705).[118] Under Abd al-Malik's reign, Abu'l Aswad al-Du'ali (died 688)
founded the Arabic grammar and invented the system of placing large coloured dots to indicate the tashkil.
The Umayyad governor al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf al-Thaqafi later enforced this system.[119]

During this time the construction of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem in 72/691–92 was done, which was
complete with Quranic inscriptions. The inscriptions on the Dome of the Rock in fact represent the earliest
known dated passages from the Quran. In these inscriptions, many letters are already provided with
diacritical points.[118]

The earliest codices of the Quran found in the Umayyad period were most likely made in single volumes,
which can be determined from the large fragments that have survived. Also during this time, the format of
the codex went from being vertical to horizontal in the 8th century. It is believed this change to horizontal
formats and thick/heavy-looking scripts may have been done to show the superiority of the Quran and to
distinguish the Islamic tradition from the Jewish and Christian ones, who used vertical formats for their
scriptures.[118]

During this time, there was a diversity of styles in which the Quran was written. One characteristic seen in
most of these manuscripts is the elongated shafts of the free-standing alif and the right-sided tail (foot) of the
isolated alif. Also, these manuscripts do not have headings of chapters (suras). Instead, a blank space is left
at the end of one sura and at the beginning of another.[118]

Abbasid Period (132/750–640/1258)

Early Abbasid Style

Unlike the manuscripts from the Umayyad Dynasty, many of the early Abbasid manuscripts were copied in
a number of volumes. This is evident from the large scripts used and the smaller number of lines per page.
Early Quranic manuscripts provide evidence for the history of the Quranic text and their formal features tell
us something about the way art and its deeper meaning were perceived in the classical age of Islam. Both
its script and layout turned out to be constructed according to elaborate geometrical and proportional
rules.[120]

The main characteristic of these scripts was their writing style. The letters in most of these manuscripts are
heavy-looking, relatively short and horizontally elongated. The slanted isolated form of the alif that was
present in the Umayyad period completely disappeared and was replaced by a straight shaft with a
pronounced right-sided foot, set at a considerable distance from the following letter. Also, unlike the Hijazi
scripts, these are often richly illuminated in gold and other colours. Another difference is that sura headings
are clearly marked and enclosed in rectangular panels with marginal vignettes or palmettes protruding into
the outer margins. These Qurans of the early Abbasid period were also bound in wooden boards, structured
like a box enclosed on all sides with a movable upper cover that was fastened to the rest of the structure
with leather thongs.[118]

New Abbasid Style

The New Abbasid Style (NS) began at the end of the 9th century C.E. and was used for copying the Quran
until the 12th centuries, and maybe even as late as the 13th century. Unlike manuscripts copied in Early
Abbasid scripts, NS manuscripts had vertical formats.[118]

During this time, Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi (died 786) devised a tashkil system to replace that of
Abu al-Aswad. His system has been universally used since the early 11th century, and includes six
diacritical marks: fatha (a), damma (u), kasra (i), sukun (vowel-less), shadda (double consonant), madda
(vowel prolongation; applied to the alif).[121]

Another central figure during this time was Abu Bakr b. Mujāhid (died 324/936). His goal was to restrict
the number of reliable readings and accept only those based on a fairly uniform consonantal text. He chose
seven well-known Quran teachers of the 2nd/8th century and declared that their readings all had divine
authority, which the others lacked. He based this on the popular ḥadith in which Muhammad says the
Quran was revealed to him in "seven aḥruf". During this time there was strong Quranic traditions in Kufa,
Baṣra, Medina, Damascus, and Mecca. Due to this, Ibn Mujāhid selected one reading each for Medina,
Mecca, Baṣra, and Damascus—those of Nafi‘ (died 169/785), Ibn Kathir (died 120/737), Abu ʿAmr (died
154/770), and IbnʿAmir (died 118/736), respectively—and three for Kūfa, those of ʿAsim (died 127/744),
Ḥamza (died 156/772), and al-Kisaʾi (died 189/804). His attempt to limit the number of canonical readings
to seven was not acceptable to all, and there was strong support for alternative readings in most of the five
cities. In the present day the most common reading that is in general use is that of 'Aasim al-Kufi through
Hafs.[53]

The 11th-century eastern Quranic manuscript contains the 20th juz' (section) of a Quran that originally
consisted of 30 parts. The arrangement into 30 parts corresponds to the number of days in the month of
Ramadan, during which the Muslim is obliged to fast and to read through the whole of the Quran. Other
sections or fragments of this magnificent manuscript lie scattered in various collections all over the world. A
Turkish note ascribes the Quran to the hand of the Caliph Ali, Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, and
thus demonstrates the high significance of this manuscript. The text is written in Eastern Kufic, a
monumental script that was developed in Iran in the late 10th century. The writing and the illumination of
the manuscript bear witness to the great artistic skills of the calligrapher and the illustrator. The manuscript
is at the Bavarian State Library in Munich, Germany.[122] Out of seven complete or nearly complete semi-
Kufic Qurans from before the end of the eleventh century, four contain a verse count. Although admittedly
a small sample, it does suggest that the use of a verse count was a prevalent and quite deeply rooted
practice in semi-Kufic Qurans between ca. 950 and ca. 1100.[123]

Abu Ali Muhammad ibn Muqla (died 940), an accomplished calligrapher from Baghdad, was also a
prominent figure at this time. He became vizir to three Abbasid caliphs and is credited with developing the
first script to obey strict proportional rules. Ibn Muqla's system was used in the development and
standardization of the Quranic script, and his calligraphic work became the standard way of writing the
Quran.[121] However it was later perfected by Ibn al-Bawwab (d. 1022), the master calligrapher who
continued Muqla's tradition. Muqla's system became one of the most popular styles for transcribing Arabic
manuscripts in general, being favoured for its legibility. The eleventh century Quran is one of the earliest
dated manuscripts in this style.[124]

This "new style" is defined by breaks and angular forms and by extreme contrasts between the thick and
thin strokes. The script was initially used in administrative and legal documents, but then it replaced earlier
Quranic scripts. It is possible that it was easier to read than the early 'Abbasid scripts, which differ greatly
from current writing. Economic factors may also have played a part because while the "new style" was
being introduced, paper was also beginning to spread throughout the Muslim world, and the decrease in the
price of books triggered by the introduction of this new material seems to have led to an increase in its
demand. The "new style" was the last script to spread throughout the Muslim world before the introduction
of printing. It remained in use until the 13th century, at which point it was restricted to titles only.[8]: 177

1924 Cairo edition

The influential standard Quran of Cairo ("1342 Cairo text" using the Islamic calendar) is the Quran that
was used throughout almost all the Muslim world until the Saudi Quran of 1985. The Egyptian edition is
based on the "Ḥafṣ" version ("qira'at") based on ʻAsim's recitation, the 8th-century recitation of Kufa.[125]
۞[126] It uses a set of additional symbols and an elaborate system of modified vowel-signs and for minute
details, not identical to any older system.[127] The Cairo edition has become the standard for modern
printings of the Quran[128][129] with the exception of those used in all North Africa (excluding Egypt)
where the Warsh version is used.[130]

A committee of leading professors from Al-Azhar University[131] had started work on the project in 1907
but it was not until 10 July 1924 that the "Cairo Qur’an" was first published by Amiri Press under the
patronage of Fuad I of Egypt,[132][133] as such, it is sometimes known as the "royal (amīriyya)
edition."[134] The goal of the government of the newly formed Kingdom of Egypt was not to delegitimize
the other qir’at, but to eliminate that, which the colophon labels as errors, found in Qur’anic texts used in
state schools. To do this they chose to preserve one of the fourteen Qira'at “readings”, namely that of Hafs
(d. 180/796), student of ‘Asim. Its publication has been called a "terrific success", and the edition has been
described as one "now widely seen as the official text of the Qur’an", so popular among both Sunni and
Shi'a that the common belief among less well-informed Muslims is "that the Qur’an has a single,
unambiguous reading", i.e. that of the 1924 Cairo version. Minor amendments were made later in 1924 and
in 1936 - the "Faruq edition" in honour of then ruler, King Faruq.[135]

Reasons given for the overwhelming popularity of Hafs and Asim range from the fact that it is easy to
recite, to the simple statement that "God has chosen it".[136] Ingrid Mattson credits mass-produced printing
press mushafs with increasing the availability of the written Quran but also diminishing the diversity of
qira'at.[137] Written text has become canonical and oral recitation has lost much of its previous equality.[138]

Muslim disagreement over whether to include the Basmala within the Quranic text, reached consensus
following the 1924 Edition, which included it as the first verse (āyah) of Quran chapter 1 but otherwise
included it as an unnumbered line of text preceding the other relevant 112 chapters.[139] The Cairo Quran
adopted the Kufan tradition of separating and numbering verses,[131] and thus standardized a different
verse numbering to Flügel's 1834 edition.[140] It adopted the chronological order of chapters attributed to
Ibn Abbās, which became widely accepted following 1924.[141] A large number of pre-1924 Qurans were
destroyed by dumping them in the river Nile.[135]

Prominent committee members included Islamic scholar, Muhammad b. ‘Ali al-Husayni al-Haddad, Egypt's
senior Qur'an Reader (Shaykh al-Maqâri).[132] Noteworthy Western scholars/academics working in Egypt
during the era include Bergsträsser and Jeffery. Methodological differences aside, speculation alludes to a
spirit of cooperation. Bergsträsser was certainly impressed with the work.[135]

Completeness

Islamic sources

According to Islamic sources before Caliph Uthman's standardization, after which variants were burned,
the Quran may have contained either 116 chapters (Ubayy Ibn Ka'ab's codex) or 111 chapters (Ibn Ma'sud's
codex).[142]

Islamic view: Sunni and Shia

Most Muslims believe that Quran, as it is presented today, is complete and untouched, supported by their
faith in Quranic verses such as "We [Allah] have, without doubt, sent down the Reminder [the Quran]; and
We will assuredly guard it [from corruption]".[143]

Due to the varying accounts and hadiths on the collection and canonization of the Quran, some scholars
debate whether the Uthmanic text contains the entire body of material that was revealed to Muhammad, or
if there is material missing from the text. For example, some Sunni literature contains reports that suggest
that some of the revelations had already been lost before the collection of the Quran initiated by Abu Bakr.
In one report, 'Umar was once looking for the text of a specific verse of the Quran on stoning as a
punishment for adultery, which he remembered. Later, he discovered that the only person who had any
record of that verse had been killed in the battle of Yamama and as a result the verse was lost. Some of the
Companions recalled that same verse, one person being 'A'isha, Muhammad's youngest wife. She is
believed to have said that a sheet on which two verses, including the one on stoning, were under her
bedding and that after Muhammad died, a domestic animal got into the room and ate the sheet.[144] Experts
on hadith literature have rejected this hadith, as all routes of transmission either contain narrators charged
with dishonesty in disclosing sources or simply conflict with the majority version of the report, which all
have authentic routes of transmission but omit the part about the piece of paper being eaten.[145][146]

Certain Shia scholars state that Ali's predecessors wilfully excluded all references to the right of Ali to be
the caliph after Muhammad died. Some Shias questioned the integrity of the Uthmanic codex, stating that
two surahs, "al-Nurayn" (The Two Lights) and "al-Walayah" (the Guardianship), which dealt with the
virtues of Muhammad's family, were removed.[8]: 89–90

Al-Khoei addresses this issue and argues for the authenticity and completeness of the Quran on the basis
that it was compiled during the lifetime of Muhammad. His argument is based on hadiths and on critically
analysing the situation during and after the life of Muhammad. He states that the collection of the Quran by
Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman occurred significantly after the caliphate was decided, and so if Ali's rule
had been mentioned, there would have been no need for the Muslims to gather to appoint someone. The
fact that none of the Companions mentioned this supposed alteration, either at the beginning of the
caliphate or after Ali became caliph, is regarded as proof that this alteration did not occur.[147]
Al-Khoei also argues that by the time 'Uthman became caliph, Islam had spread to such an extent that it
was impossible for anyone to remove anything from the Quran. Uthman could have altered the text but he
would have been unable to convince all those who had memorized the Quran to go along with his
alterations.[148] Any such alteration also would have been mentioned by Uthman's political opponents and
assassins yet none accused him of this. Finally, he argues that if Uthman had altered the Quran, Ali would
have restored it to its original state upon the death of Uthman, especially if verses of his rule had been
removed. Instead Ali is seen promoting the Quran during his reign, which is evidence that there was no
alteration.[147]

Manuscripts

In the 20th century, the Sanaa manuscript was discovered. It has been radiocarbon dated to the range 578-
669 CE with 95% confidence. The manuscript is a palimpsest with quranic verses in both upper and lower
texts. The upper text has exactly the same verses and the same order of suras and verses as the standard
Quran.[149] The order of the suras in the lower text of the Sana'a codex is different from the order in the
standard Quran.[150] In addition, the lower text exhibits extensive variations from the counterpart text in the
standard Quran; such that the lower text represents the only surviving early quranic manuscript that does
not conform to the 'Uthmanic tradition. The majority of these variations add words and phrases, so as to
emphasize or clarify the standard quranic reading. Some scholars have proposed parallels for these
variations in reports of variants in 'companion codices' that were kept by individual companions to the
Prophet outside of the mainstream tradition of 'Uthman; but these correspondences are much the minority.
François Déroche proposes, on palaeographic grounds, a date for the lower text in the second half of the
first century AH (hence 672 - 722 CE) and summarises the character of the Sana'a Palimpsest, "The
scriptio inferior of the Codex Ṣanʿāʾ I has been transcribed in a milieu which adhered to a text of the
Qurʾan different from the ʿUthmanic tradition as well as from the Qurʾanic codices of Ibn Masʿūd and
Ubayy".

See also
Corpus Coranicum
Early Quranic manuscripts
Biblical and Quranic narratives
Prophets and messengers in Islam
Quranic timeline
Qisas Al-Anbiya
Criticism of the Quran

Notes
1. In contrast to the New Testament, which was transmitted among a persecuted religious
community and whose oldest extant versions are in a different language (Greek) than the
one Jesus used (Aramaic).
2. Saadi did not examine the sources of Arab Mhaggraye because none have been found.[83]

References

Citations
 1. Donner, Fred (2010). Muhammad and the Believers: at the Origins of Islam (https://archive.or
g/details/muhammadbeliever00donn). London, England: Harvard University Press. pp. 153
(https://archive.org/details/muhammadbeliever00donn/page/n173)–154. ISBN 978-0-674-
05097-6.
2. Esposito, John L. "The Islamic World: Past and Present" (http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.co
m/article/opr/t243/e275). Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
3. "The Qurʾan - Introduction" (http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/book/islam-9780192
831934/islam-9780192831934-miscMatter-6). Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Retrieved
1 May 2019.
4. F. E. Peters, "The Quest of the Historical Muhammad (https://www.jstor.org/stable/164484),
International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3 (August 1991), p. 297.
5. Muslim Information Service of Australia. "Beginning of Revelation" (http://www.missionislam.
com/quran/beginrevelation.htm). Missionislam.com. Retrieved 24 July 2015.
6. Goldfield, Isaiah (1980). "The Illiterate Prophet (Nabi Ummi): An inquiry into the
development of a dogma in Islamic tradition". Islam. 57: 58–68.
7. Reza Aslan (2 December 2008). No God But God: The Origins, Evolution and Future of
Islam (https://books.google.com/books?id=HP1zoWqpqg4C&pg=PA6). Random House.
p. 29. ISBN 978-1-4070-0928-5.
8. Esack, Farid (2005). The Qur'an: A User's Guide. Oxford England: Oneworld Publications.
ISBN 978-1851683543.
9. Quran 10:15 (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2002.02.
0002%3Asura%3D10%3Averse%3D15) (Translated by Pickthall)
10. Al Faruqi, Lois Ibsen (1987). "The Cantillation of the Qur'an". Asian Music. 19 (1): 3–4.
doi:10.2307/833761 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F833761). JSTOR 833761 (https://www.jstor.
org/stable/833761).
11. Quran 21:5 (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2002.02.0
002%3Asura%3D21%3Averse%3D5) (Translated by Pickthall)
12. Quran 37:36 (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2002.02.
0002%3Asura%3D37%3Averse%3D36) (Translated by Pickthall)
13. Leaman, Oliver (2006). The Qur'an: an Encyclopedia (https://archive.org/details/quranencycl
opedi2006unse/page/540). New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 540–543 (https://archive.org/detail
s/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/540). ISBN 0-415-32639-7.
14. Leemhuis, Fred (2006). Jane Dammen MacAuliffe (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the
Qur'ān. Cambridge. pp. 145–155. ISBN 9780521539340.
15. "Sahih Bukhari, Book of Judgements" (https://sunnah.com/bukhari/93/53). Sunnah.com.
Retrieved 14 October 2018.
16. Cenap Çakmak, ed. (2017). Islam: A Worldwide Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. pp. 1116–1120.
ISBN 9781610692175.
17. "Who were the scribes who wrote the letters of the Messenger (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him)? Question 20968" (https://islamqa.info/en/answers/20968/the-scribes-of
-the-prophet-peace-and-blessings-of-allaah-be-upon-him). Islam Question and Answer. 17
August 2002. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
18. Rippin, Andrew (2009). The Blackwell Companion to the Qur'an. Chichester, West Sussex:
Blackwell Publishing. p. 165. ISBN 978-1-4051-8820-3.
19. Rippin, Andrew (2009). The Blackwell Companion to the Qur'an. Chichester, West Sussex:
Blackwell Publishing. pp. 165–166. ISBN 978-1-4051-8820-3.
20. Ibn al-Hajjaj, Muslim. "Sahih Muslim, Book 31, #5920" (http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/h
adith/muslim/031-smt.php#031.5920).
21. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena to the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. p. 172. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
22. Jones, Alan (2003). "The word made visible: Arabic script and the committing of the Qur'an
to writing" (https://books.google.com/books?id=axNbLoiLLgMC&pg=PA1). In Robinson,
Chase F. (ed.). Texts, documents, and artefacts [electronic resource]: Islamic studies in
honour of D.S. Richards. Leiden, Boston: BRILL. pp. 1–16. ISBN 9789004128644.
23. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena to the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. p. 173. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
24. Modarressi, Hossein (1993). "Early Debates on the Integrity of the Qur'an: A Brief Survey".
Studia Islamica. 77 (77): 8. doi:10.2307/1595789 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1595789).
JSTOR 1595789 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1595789).
25. "The Biography of Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq" (https://archive.org/stream/TheBiographyOfAbuBa
krAsSiddeeq/TheBiographyOfAbuBakrAs-siddeeq#page/n505/mode/2up). Retrieved
19 September 2017.
26. "Hadith - Book of Judgments (Ahkaam) - Sahih al-Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and
Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/bukhari/93/53).
Sunnah.com. 26 April 2012. Retrieved 24 July 2015.
27. Usmani, Mohammad Taqi (2000). Abdur Rehman, Rafiq (ed.). An approach to the Quranic
sciences. Translated by Siddiqui, Mohammed Swaleh. Birmingham: Darul Ish'at. pp. 191–6.
28. Sutton, Antoine (2018). Introducing A.E. Housman (1859-1936): Preliminary Studies (https://
books.google.com/books?id=yfhVDwAAQBAJ&q=70+Muslims+who+has+memorized+the+
Quran+were+killed+in+the+battle+of+the+yamama&pg=PA47). Cambridge scholars
publisher. p. 47. ISBN 9781527509474. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
29. Aḥmad, Āftāb (1984). Islamic Calligraphy: Noon-wal-qalam (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=2vMjAAAAMAAJ&q=70+Hafiz+Muslims+who+has+memorized+the+Quran+were+kille
d). p. 26. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
30. Hasan, Sayyid Siddiq; Nadwi, Abul Hasan Ali (2000). The collection of the Qur'an.
Translated by Kidwai, A.R. Karachi: Qur'anic Arabic Foundation. pp. 34–5.
31. Muhammad Mustafa Al-A'zami (2003), The History of The Qur'anic Text: From Revelation to
Compilation: A Comparative Study with the Old and New Testaments, p.83. UK Islamic
Academy. ISBN 978-1872531656.
32. "The Biography of Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq" (https://archive.org/stream/TheBiographyOfAbuBa
krAsSiddeeq/TheBiographyOfAbuBakrAs-siddeeq#page/n507/mode/2up). Retrieved
19 September 2017.
33. "Hadith - Book of Virtues of the Qur'an - Sahih al-Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and
Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/bukhari/66/26).
Sunnah.com. 26 April 2012. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
34. Muhammad Ali Aziz (30 March 2011). Religion and Mysticism in Early Islam: Theology and
Sufism in Yemen (https://books.google.com/books?id=tQICAwAAQBAJ&q=sunna).
ISBN 9780857719607.
35. "Hadith - Chapters on Virtues - Jami' at-Tirmidhi - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of
Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/635600). Sunnah.com.
Retrieved 19 September 2017.
36. "Hadith - Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh)) - Sahih al-
Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و‬
‫( ")ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/42080). Sunnah.com. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
37. "Hadith - Book of Prayer (Kitab Al-Salat): Detailed Injunctions about Witr - Sunan Abi Dawud
- Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://
sunnah.com/abudawud/8/106). Sunnah.com. 9 April 2013. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
38. "Hadith - The Book of Virtue, Enjoining Good Manners, and Joining of the Ties of Kinship -
Sahih Muslim - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‬
‫( ")و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/muslim/45/79). Sunnah.com. 26 April 2012. Retrieved
19 September 2017.
39. "Hadith - Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh)) - Sahih al-
Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و‬
‫( ")ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/41630). Sunnah.com. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
40. "Hadith - Book of Dialects and Readings of the Qur'an (Kitab Al-Huruf Wa Al-Qira'at) - Sunan
Abi Dawud - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و‬
‫( ")ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/abudawud/32/25). Sunnah.com. 21 October 2012. Retrieved
19 September 2017.
41. "Hadith - The Book of Fighting [The Prohibition of Bloodshed] - Sunan an-Nasa'i -
Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://s
unnah.com/nasai/37/41). Sunnah.com. 31 January 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
42. "Hadith - The Book of Mosques and Places of Prayer - Sahih Muslim - Sunnah.com -
Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/mu
slim/5/140). Sunnah.com. 26 April 2012. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
43. "Hadith - Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh)) - Sahih al-
Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و‬
‫( ")ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/42220). Sunnah.com. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
44. "Hadith - Chapters on Tafsir - Jami' at-Tirmidhi - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of
Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/641150). Sunnah.com.
Retrieved 19 September 2017.
45. "Hadith - Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh)) - Sahih al-
Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و‬
‫( ")ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/46560). Sunnah.com. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
46. "Hadith - Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh)) - Sahih al-
Bukhari - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و‬
‫( ")ﺳﻠﻢ‬http://sunnah.com/urn/46400). Sunnah.com. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
47. Cook, The Koran, 2000: p.119
48. Leaman, Oliver (2006). "Canon" (https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/pag
e/136). The Qur'an: an Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 136–139 (https://archiv
e.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/136). ISBN 0-415-32639-7.
49. Al-Tabari (1989). Ihsan Abbas; C. E. Bosworth; Jacob Lassner; Franz Rosenthal; Ehsan Yar-
Shater (eds.). The History of al-Tabari: The Conquest of Iraq, Southwestern Persia, and
Egypt. Gautier H. A. Juynboll (trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 2–
6. ISBN 0-88706-876-6.
50. "Sahih al-Bukhari 7191 - Judgments (Ahkaam) - ‫ ﻛﺘﺎب اﻷﺣﻜﺎم‬- Sunnah.com - Sayings and
Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬https://sunnah.com/bukhari:7191).
sunnah.com. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
51. Al-Tabari (1990). Ihsan Abbas; C. E. Bosworth; Franz Rosenthal; Ehsan Yar-Sharter (eds.).
The History of al-Tabari: The Crisis of the Early Caliphate. Stephen Humphreys (trans.).
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. p. 8. ISBN 0-7914-0154-5.
52. al-Tabari (1990). Ihsan Abbas; C. E. Bosworth; Franz Rosenthal; Ehsan Yar-Sharter (eds.).
The History of al-Tabari: The Crisis of the Early Caliphate. R. Humphreys (trans.). Albany,
NY: State University of New York Press. p. 42. ISBN 0-7914-0154-5.
53. Welch, A. T.; Paret, R.; Pearson, J. D. (1960). "al-Ḳurʾān" (https://referenceworks.brillonline.c
om/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/al-kuran-COM_0543). In Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel,
E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P.; Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch.; Schacht, J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam,
Second Edition. 1. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0543 (http
s://doi.org/10.1163%2F1573-3912_islam_COM_0543). ISBN 978-90-04-16121-4.
54. Sahih al-Bukhari, 6:61:510 (https://web.archive.org/web/19700101010101/http://cmje.usc.ed
u/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/061-sbt.php#006.061.510)
55. "Sahih al-Bukhari 4987 - Virtues of the Qur'an - ‫ ﻛﺘﺎب ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ اﻟﻘﺮآن‬- Sunnah.com - Sayings
and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (‫( ")ﺻﻠﻰ اﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ و ﺳﻠﻢ‬https://sunnah.com/bukhari:49
87). sunnah.com. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
56. Anthony, Sean W.; Bronson, Catherine L. (2016). "Did Ḥafṣah Edit the Qurʾān? A Response
with Notes on the Codices of the Prophet's Wives" (https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5913/jiqs
a.1.2017.a006). Journal of the International Qur'anic Studies Association. 1: 108–112.
doi:10.5913/jiqsa.1.2017.a006 (https://doi.org/10.5913%2Fjiqsa.1.2017.a006).
JSTOR 10.5913/jiqsa.1.2017.a006 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5913/jiqsa.1.2017.a006).
57. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena to the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. p. 175. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
58. Leaman, Oliver (2006). "Ali"
(https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/30). The Qur'an: an
Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 30–31 (https://archive.org/details/quranencyclo
pedi2006unse/page/30). ISBN 0-415-32639-7.
59. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena to the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. p. 153. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
60. Leaman, Oliver (2006). "Ali"
(https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/30). The Qur'an: an
Encyclopedia. New York: Routledge. pp. 30–31 (https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi
2006unse/page/30). ISBN 0-415-32639-7.
61. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena to the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. pp. 154–155. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
62. Andrew Rippin (2009). "Qur'an" (http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9
780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0066.xml). Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. "How the Qurʾan came into being and why it looks the way it does has
proven to be a continual focus of attention for scholarship. Most accounts accept the basic
framework of the Muslim memory, with the role of Muhammad as the recipient of revelation
and the role subsequent caliphs in bringing the text together clearly separated. Some
scholarship has wanted to challenge the originality and source of the text itself, tracing it to
other religious communities (especially Christian: Lüling 2003; Luxenberg 2007). Others
have tried to refine the Muslim accounts of revelation and collection."
63. Holland, 'In the Shadow of the Sword, 2012: p.45
64. Cilliot, Claude "Muhammad, le Curan et les `Contraites de l'Histoire`" in Wild, Stefan
(editor): The Qur'an as Text (Leiden, 1966), p.4
65. Neva & Koren, "Methodological Approaches to Islamic Studies", 2000: p.420
66. Crone, Patricia (1987). Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 223.
67. Neva & Koren, "Methodological Approaches to Islamic Studies", 2000: p.422-6
68. Fred Donner (2008). Gabriel Said Reynolds (ed.). The Qur'an in Recent Scholarship. The
Quran in its historical context. Routledge. p. 29.
69. Yehuda D. Nevo "Towards a Prehistory of Islam," Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,
vol. 17, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1994 p. 108.
70. John Wansbrough The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation
History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978 p. 119
71. Patricia Crone, Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam, Princeton University Press, 1987 p.
204.
72. P. Crone and M. Cook, Hagarism: The Making Of The Islamic World, 1977, Cambridge
University Press
73. Patricia Crone, Michael Cook, and Gerd R. Puin as quoted in Toby Lester (January 1999).
"What Is the Koran?" (https://www.theatlantic.com/doc/199901/koran). The Atlantic Monthly.
74. LESTER, TOBY (January 1999). "What Is the Koran?" (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazin
e/archive/1999/01/what-is-the-koran/304024/). Atlantic. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
75. Cook, The Koran, 2000: p.138
76. Rose, Christopher (4 November 2015). "Episode 75: The Birmingham Qur'ān" (https://15min
utehistory.org/2015/11/04/episode-75-the-birmingham-quran/). 15 minute history. Retrieved
23 September 2019.
77. Cook, The Koran, 2000: p.140
78. Saadi, "Nascent Islam in the Seventh Century Syriac Sources", 2008: p.219-220
79. Holland, 'In the Shadow of the Sword, 2012: p.41
80. Crossroads to Islam: The Origins of the Arab Religion and the Arab State, by Yehuda D.
Nevo and Judith Koren, Prometheus Books, 2003, part 2
81. Reynolds, "Quranic studies and its controversies", 2008: p.14
82. Cook, Michael (1983). Muhammad. Oxford University Press. pp. 67–8. ISBN 0192876058.
83. Saadi, "Nascent Islam in the Seventh Century Syriac Sources", 2008: p.217-18
84. Yehuda D. Nevo "Towards a Prehistory of Islam," Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,
vol.17, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1994 p. 108.
85. John Wansbrough The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation
History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978 p,119
86. El-Badawi, Emran (17 December 2013). "Challenges posed by the Quranic text" (https://boo
ks.google.com/books?id=EM9iAgAAQBAJ&q=%22to+an+Arabian+context+of+early+believ
ers+preceding%22&pg=PT31). The Qur'an and the Aramaic Gospel Traditions. Routledge.
ISBN 9781317929321. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
87. "Emran El-Badawi | Faculty | MCL" (https://uh.edu/class/mcl/faculty/el-badawi_e/index.php).
88. Emran El- Badawi "Sectarian Scripture: The Quran's Dogmatic Re-articulation of the
Aramaic Gospel Tradition in the Late Antique Near East" Research Dissertation University
of Chicago., p 17
89. Lumbard, Joseph. "New Light on the History of the Quranic Text?" (http://www.huffingtonpos
t.com/joseph-e-b-lumbard/new-light-on-the-history-_b_7864930.html). HuffPost. Retrieved
27 July 2015.
90. Joseph E. B. Lumbard|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-e-b-lumbard/new-light-on-
the-history-_b_7864930.html
91. Whelan, Estelle (1998). "Forgotten Witness: Evidence For The Early Codification Of The
Qur'an" (https://www.islamic-awareness.org/history/islam/dome_of_the_rock/estwitness).
Journal of the American Oriental Society. 118: 1–14. doi:10.2307/606294 (https://doi.org/10.
2307%2F606294). JSTOR 606294 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/606294).
92. "Archived copy" (https://web.archive.org/web/20080905011505/http://www.gazellebookservi
ces.co.uk/ISBN/1591026342.htm). Archived from the original (http://www.gazellebookservice
s.co.uk/ISBN/1591026342.htm) on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
93. Patricia Crone, Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam, pp. 203-30, where she argues that
much of the classical Muslim understanding of the Koran rests on the work of storytellers
and that this work is of very dubious historical value. These storytellers contributed to the
tradition on the rise of Islam, and this is evident in the steady growth of information: "If one
storyteller should happen to mention a raid, the next storyteller would know the date of this
raid, while the third would know everything that an audience might wish to hear about it." 53
Then, comparing the accounts of the raid of Kharrar by Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi, Crone
shows that al-Waqidi, influenced by and in the manner of the storytellers, "will always give
precise dates, locations, names, where Ibn Ishaq has none, accounts of what triggered the
expedition, miscellaneous information to lend color to the event, as well as reasons why, as
was usually the case, no fighting took place."
94. Patricia Crone, Slaves on Horses, pp. 15-16.
95. The Syro-Aramaic Reading Of The Qur'an, 2007 English edition
 96. Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing, Donner, Darwin
Press, 1998, p. 60, ISBN 0-87850-127-4.
97. Lester, Toby (January 1999). "What Is the Quran?" (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar
chive/1999/01/what-is-the-koran/304024/). The Atlantic.
98. Press Office, University of Birmingham (22 July 2015). "Birmingham Qur'an manuscript
dated among the oldest in the world" (https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/2015/07/qur
an-manuscript-22-07-15.aspx). University of Birmingham Press Office. Birmingham,
England. Retrieved 26 August 2018.
99. Donner, Fred Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing,
Darwin Press, 1998
100. Lester, Toby (1 January 1999). "What Is the Koran?" (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/
archive/1999/01/what-is-the-koran/304024/). The Atlantic.
101. Small, Keith E. (2011). Textual Criticism and Qur’ān Manuscripts. Lexington Books.
ISBN 9780739142912. p. 178
102. Introduction to the Qur'an 2nd Edition, Richard Bell, W. Montgomery Watt, Edinburgh
University Press, 1970, ISBN 0-7486-0597-5, ISBN 978-0-7486-0597-2 p. 66.
103. Bulliet 2015, p. 111.
104. Hughes 2013, p. 85.
105. Leirvik 2010, pp. 33-34.
106. Leirvik 2010, pp. 33–34.
107. Leirvik 2010, p. 33.
108. Samuel A. Berman, Midrash Tanhuma-Yelammedenu (KTAV Publishing house, 1996) 31-32
109. Gerald Friedlander, Pirḳe de-R. Eliezer, (The Bloch Publishing Company, 1916) 156
110. F. E. Peters, The Quest of the Historical Muhammad, International Journal of Middle East
Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Aug.,1991), p. 293
111. Muhammad Mustafa Al-A'zami (2003), The History of The Qur'anic Text: From Revelation to
Compilation: A Comparative Study with the Old and New Testaments, p.197. UK Islamic
Academy. ISBN 978-1872531656.
112. Muhammad Mustafa Al-A'zami (2003), The History of The Qur'anic Text: From Revelation to
Compilation: A Comparative Study with the Old and New Testaments, pp.199-201. UK
Islamic Academy. ISBN 978-1872531656.
113. Harvey, Ramon (2017). "The Legal Epistemology of Qur'anic Variants: The Readings of Ibn
Masʿūd in Kufan fiqh and the Ḥanafī madhhab" (https://ramonharvey.files.wordpress.com/20
19/06/readings-of-ibn-masud-ramon-harvey.pdf) (PDF). Journal of Qur'anic Studies. 9 (1):
72–101. doi:10.3366/jqs.2017.0268 (https://doi.org/10.3366%2Fjqs.2017.0268).
114. Anthony, Sean (2019). "Two 'Lost' Sūras of the Qurʾān: Sūrat al-Khalʿ and Sūrat al-Ḥafd
between Textual and Ritual Canon (1st -3rd/7th -9th Centuries) [Pre-Print Version]" (https://w
ww.academia.edu/40869286). Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam. 46: 73–79.
115. Sadeghi, Behnam; Goudarzi, Mohsen (2012). "Ṣan'ā' 1 and the Origins of the Qur'ān" (http://
pl.scribd.com/doc/110978941/Sanaa-1-and-the-Origins-of-the-Qur-An). Der Islam. Berlin: De
Gruyter. 87 (1–2): 24. doi:10.1515/islam-2011-0025 (https://doi.org/10.1515%2Fislam-2011-
0025). S2CID 164120434 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:164120434).
116. Ahmad von Denffer. "An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur'an" (http://www.islamicbulleti
n.org/free_downloads/quran/ul_umal_quran.pdf) (PDF). Islamicbulletin.org. Retrieved
19 September 2017.
117. Introduction to the Qur'an, Richard Bell, W. Montgomery Watt, Edinburgh University Press,
1995, ISBN 978-0748605972, p. 51.
118. Leaman, Oliver (2006). "Manuscript and the Qur'an" (https://archive.org/details/quranencyclo
pedi2006unse/page/384). The Qur'an: an Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 384–
389 (https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/384). ISBN 0-415-32639-7.
119. Leaman, Oliver (2006). "Calligraphy and the Qur'an" (https://archive.org/details/quranencycl
opedi2006unse/page/131). The Qur'an: an Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 131
(https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/131). ISBN 0-415-32639-7.
120. Alan George (2007). "Geometry of early Qur'anic Manuscripts". Journal of Qur'anic Studies.
Edinburgh University Press. 9 (1): 78–110. doi:10.3366/jqs.2007.9.1.78 (https://doi.org/10.33
66%2Fjqs.2007.9.1.78). JSTOR 25728237 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/25728237).
121. Leaman, Oliver (2006). "Calligraphy and the Qur'an" (https://archive.org/details/quranencycl
opedi2006unse/page/130). The Qur'an: an Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Routledge.
pp. 130–131 (https://archive.org/details/quranencyclopedi2006unse/page/130). ISBN 0-415-
32639-7.
122. "11th Century Qur'an in Eastern Kufic" (https://www.wdl.org/en/item/8937/). 1000.
123. Yasser Tabbaa (1991). "The transformation of Arabic writing". Ars Orientalis. University of
Michigan. 21: 119–148. JSTOR 4629416 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/4629416).
124. "11th Century Qur'an" (http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/sacredtexts/iraqiquran.html). Retrieved
19 September 2017.
125. Böwering, "Recent Research on the Construction of the Quran", 2008: p. 74
126. Q2:26 Commences with ۞ (https://quran.com/2?translations=20) (1/199) (rubʿ al-ḥizb), an
Islamic symbol used as a dividing system is to facilitate the recitation of the Quran.
127. Stefan Wild, "Reading" The Quran: an Encyclopedia, Routledge
128. Rippin, Andrew; et al. (2006). The Blackwell companion to the Qur'an (https://archive.org/det
ails/blackwellcompani00ripp_0) ([2a reimpr.] ed.). Blackwell. ISBN 978140511752-4.
For the history of compilation see Introduction by Tamara Sonn pp. 5–6
129. Melchert, Christopher (2000). "Ibn Mujahid and the Establishment of Seven Qur'anic
Readings". Studia Islamica (91): 5–22. doi:10.2307/1596266 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F15
96266). JSTOR 1596266 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1596266).
130. Aisha Geissinger, Gender and Muslim Constructions of Exegetical Authority: A Rereading of
the Classical Genre of Qurʾān Commentary (https://books.google.com/books?id=7lPFCQAA
QBAJ&pg=PA79&dq=warsh+quran&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=warsh&f=fal
se), pg. 79. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2015. ISBN 9789004294448
131. Stefan Wild, "basmallah" The Quran: an Encyclopedia, Routledge
132. Brockett, Adrian Alan, Studies in two transmissions of the Qur'an (https://research-repository.
st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/2770)
133. Peter G. Riddell, Early Malay Qur'anic exegical activity (https://books.google.com/books?id=
Tq1v_V4haj4C&pg=PA164&dq=nafi%27+al+madani&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepag
e&q=nafi'%20al%20madani&f=false), p. 164. Taken from Islam and the Malay-Indonesian
World: Transmission and Responses. London: C. Hurst & Co., 2001. ISBN 9781850653363
134. Albin, Michael W. (2006). "Printing of the Qurʾān". In McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.).
Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. IV. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1875-
3922_q3_EQCOM_00158 (https://doi.org/10.1163%2F1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00158).
ISBN 90-04-14743-8.
135. Reynolds, Gabriel Said (2008). "Introduction: Qur'anic Studies and its Controversies". In
Reynolds, Gabriel Said (ed.). The Qur'an in its Historical Context (https://archive.org/details/
quranitshistoric00reyn). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. pp. 1–26 (https://archive.org/deta
ils/quranitshistoric00reyn/page/n17). doi:10.4324/9780203939604 (https://doi.org/10.4324%
2F9780203939604). ISBN 978-0-415-42899-6. S2CID 160637821 (https://api.semanticscho
lar.org/CorpusID:160637821). Retrieved 15 January 2021.
136. "Popularity of the recitation of Hafs from 'Aasim. Fatwa No: 118960" (https://www.islamweb.n
et/en/fatwa/118960/popularity-of-the-recitation-of-hafs-from-aasim). Islamweb. 9 March 2009.
Retrieved 11 April 2020. (Qatari Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs)
137. Mattson, Ingrid (2013). The Story of the Qur'an: Its History and Place in Muslim Life (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=_-eUnDh_OWgC&q=recitation+of+Hafs+now+became+domina
nt&pg=PA129). John Wiley & Sons. p. 129. ISBN 9780470673492. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
138. Stefan Wild, "Canon" The Quran: an Encyclopedia, Routledge
139. Graham, William A. (2006). "Basmala". In McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.). Encyclopaedia of
the Qurʾān. I. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00024 (https://d
oi.org/10.1163%2F1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00024). ISBN 90-04-14743-8.
140. McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (2006). "Preface". In McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.).
Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. VI. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-14764-5.
141. Böwering, Gerhard (2006). "Chronology and the Qurʾān". In McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.).
Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. I. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1875-
3922_q3_EQCOM_00034 (https://doi.org/10.1163%2F1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00034).
ISBN 90-04-14743-8.
142. As-Suyuti, "Al-Itqan", pp. 152-153; Arthur Jeffery, Materials for the History of the Text of the
Qu'ran: The Old Codices. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1937.
143. Quran 15:9 (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2002.02.0
002%3Asura%3D15%3Averse%3D9) (Translated by Pickthall)
144. Modarressi, Hossein (1993). "Early Debates on the Integrity of the Qur'an: A Brief Survey".
Studia Islamica. Maisonneuve and Larose. 77.
145. Shu'aib al-Arna`ut, Tahqiq Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, vol. 6, pg. 269, hadith #26,359.
Beirut: Mu`assasah al-Risalah.
146. Muhammad Taqi Usmani, Takmilat Fath al-Mulhim, vol. 1, pg. 69. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath
al-Arabi.
147. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena to the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. pp. 150–158. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
148. Al-Khu'i, Al-Sayyid (1998). The Prolegomena the Qur'an. New York: Oxford University
Press. p. 172. ISBN 0-19-511675-5.
149. Behnam Sadeghi & Mohsen Goudarzi, "Sana'a and the Origins of the Qu'ran (https://bible-q
uran.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Sadeghi-Goudarzi-sana-Origins-of-the-Quran.pdf)",
Der Islam, 87 (2012), 26.
150. Behnam Sadeghi & Mohsen Goudarzi, "Sana'a and the Origins of the Qu'ran", Der Islam, 87
(2012), 23.

Bibliography
Aslan, Reza (2 December 2008). No God But God: The Origins, Evolution and Future of
Islam (https://books.google.com/books?id=HP1zoWqpqg4C&pg=PA6). Random House.
p. 29. ISBN 978-1-4070-0928-5.
Bulliet, Richard W. (2015). "Islamo-Christian Civilization" (https://books.google.com/books?i
d=_B2DCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA109). In Blidstein, Moshe; Silverstein, Adam J.; Stroumsa, Guy
G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Abrahamic Religions. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. pp. 109–112. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697762.013.6 (https://doi.org/10.1093%2
Foxfordhb%2F9780199697762.013.6). ISBN 978-0-19-969776-2. LCCN 2014960132 (http
s://lccn.loc.gov/2014960132). S2CID 170430270 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:
170430270). Retrieved 14 October 2020.
Leemhuis, Fred (2006). MacAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the
Qur'ān. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 145–155. ISBN 9780521539340.
Cook, Michael (2000). The Koran: A Very Short Introduction (https://archive.org/details/koran
veryshorti00cook). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0192853449. "The Koran: A Very
Short Introduction"
 Donner, Fred McGraw (2010). Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam (https://
archive.org/details/muhammadbeliever00donn). London: Harvard University Press. pp. 153–
154 (https://archive.org/details/muhammadbeliever00donn/page/n173). ISBN 978-0-674-
05097-6.
Esposito, John L. "The Islamic World: Past and Present" (http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.co
m/article/opr/t243/e275). Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
Holland, Tom (2012). In the Shadow of the Sword (https://books.google.com/books?id=1f_B
R2DulRIC&q=in+the+shadow+of+the+sword+holland). New York: Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-
385-53135-1. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
Hughes, Aaron W. (2013). "The Quran: The Base Narrative" (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=ZmGrAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA67). Muslim Identities: An Introduction to Islam. Choice
Reviews Online. 51. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 67–92.
doi:10.5860/choice.51-0824 (https://doi.org/10.5860%2Fchoice.51-0824). ISBN 978-0-231-
53192-4. JSTOR 10.7312/hugh16146.8 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/hugh16146.8).
S2CID 169663918 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:169663918). Retrieved
14 October 2020.
Nöldeke, Theodor; Schwally, Friedrich; Bergsträsser, Gotthelf; Pretzl, Otto (2013). "The
Genesis of the Authorized Redaction of the Koran under the Caliph ʿUthmān" (https://books.
google.com/books?id=uKEHNcrPC9cC&pg=PA251). In Behn, Wolfgang H. (ed.). The
History of the Qurʾān. Texts and Studies on the Qurʾān. 8. Translated by Behn, Wolfgang H.
Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 251–275. doi:10.1163/9789004228795_017 (https://
doi.org/10.1163%2F9789004228795_017). ISBN 978-90-04-21234-3. ISSN 1567-2808 (http
s://www.worldcat.org/issn/1567-2808). Retrieved 15 January 2021.
Reeves, John C. (2004). "Some Explorations of the Intertwining of Bible and Qur'ān" (https://
books.google.com/books?id=WNId86Eu4TEC&pg=PA43). In Reeves, John C. (ed.). Bible
and Qurʼān: Essays in Scriptural Intertextuality. SBL Symposium. 24. Leiden: Brill
Publishers. pp. 43–60. ISBN 978-90-04-12726-5. ISSN 1569-3627 (https://www.worldcat.or
g/issn/1569-3627). S2CID 160092342 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16009234
2). Retrieved 15 January 2021.
Reynolds, Gabriel Said (2008). "Introduction: Qur'anic Studies and its Controversies". In
Reynolds, Gabriel Said (ed.). The Qur'an in its Historical Context (https://archive.org/details/
quranitshistoric00reyn). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. pp. 1–26 (https://archive.org/deta
ils/quranitshistoric00reyn/page/n17). doi:10.4324/9780203939604 (https://doi.org/10.4324%
2F9780203939604). ISBN 978-0-415-42899-6. S2CID 160637821 (https://api.semanticscho
lar.org/CorpusID:160637821).
Saadi, Abdul-Massih (2008). "Nascent Islam in the Seventh Century Syriac Sources". In
Reynolds, Gabriel Said (ed.). The Qur'an in its Historical Context (https://archive.org/details/
quranitshistoric00reyn). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. pp. 217–222 (https://archive.org/
details/quranitshistoric00reyn/page/n233). doi:10.4324/9780203939604 (https://doi.org/10.4
324%2F9780203939604). ISBN 978-0-415-42899-6. S2CID 211653850 (https://api.semanti
cscholar.org/CorpusID:211653850).
Sinai, Nicolai (2009). "The Qurʾan As Process" (https://books.google.com/books?id=GcgCEr
hKGrAC&pg=PA405). In Marx, Michael; Neuwirth, Angelika; Sinai, Nicolai (eds.). The
Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into the Qurʾānic Milieu. Texts and
Studies on the Qurʾān. 6. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 405–440.
doi:10.1163/ej.9789004176881.i-864.104 (https://doi.org/10.1163%2Fej.9789004176881.i-8
64.104). ISBN 978-90-04-17688-1. ISSN 1567-2808 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/1567-28
08). S2CID 191057440 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:191057440). Retrieved
15 January 2021.

Further reading
 M. M. Azami (2003). The History of the Qur'anic Text from Revelation to Compilation: A
Comparative Study with the Old and New Testaments. UK Islamic Academy. ISBN 978-
1872531656.
Jane Dammen McAuliffe, ed. (2006). The Cambridge Companion to the Quar'an. Cambridge
University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-53934-0.
Adam J. Silverstein (2010). Islamic History: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University
Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954572-8.

External links
Read Quran Online (http://www.read-quranonline.com)
Dated Muslim Texts From 1-72 AH / 622-691 AD: Documentary Evidence For Early Islam (ht
tp://www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/earlyislam.html) Islamic
Awareness
Corpus Coranicum: comprehensive website on early Quran manuscripts by the Berlin-
Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (http://www.corpuscoranicum.de/index/
einleitung)
Several early Qur'ans: information, zoomable images (http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/sacredt
exts/sacredthemesionly.html) British Library website
History of the Quran (http://tanzil.net/pub/ebooks/History-of-Quran.pdf)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Quran&oldid=1060722418"

This page was last edited on 17 December 2021, at 07:45 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.