Practical criticism is an analytical approach to literary criticism.
It focuses on the form of the
text and concentrates upon the words on the page. A technique that “made a close study of
literature possible by isolating the text from history and context” (Peter Barry, 1995) It originated
in the 1920s, when I.A Richards started a series of experiments by giving his students some
poems to analyze, stripping them of any context. The objective of his work was to encourage
students to really focus “on the words on the page” rather than focusing on preconceived or
conventional beliefs about the text. If students were able to attain a true understanding about the
meaning and emotions of the prose and poetry they read, it would benefit them psychologically
providing them a better clarification of their own emotions. Richards concludes that the critical
reading of poetry is an arduous discipline.
Practical criticism refers to close reading. A close scrutiny of the text where one focuses on the
text rather than the context to have a better understanding of the form, structure and devices
used. I.A Richards in a way conducted a scientific experiment on his students by giving them
anonymized, unknown poems and asking for their comments.. Using poetry as an instrument, he
investigated the process of how human beings make meaning from the language.He observed the
nature of how the texts were interpreted on the basis of their understanding. Therefore practical
criticism also has an edge of being a psychological process. Practical criticism is an objective
way of reading literature and science itself is purely objective. Just like science, practical
criticism purely depends on the contents of the text where a reader is free of bias or
presupposition about the text. Therefore practical criticism is considered to be a
“scientific”approach to a text.
English is not only about reading literature but also examining and interpreting it. There can be
numerous ways of interpreting a text based on a reader’s understanding of it. In an applied
critique, practical criticism is concerned with the discussion of specific works and writers. The
theoretical concepts that govern the mood of the analysis, interpretation, and evaluation are
frequently left unaddressed or introduced only when the situation demands it. It is an intrinsic
approach where the plot is given utmost importance ,whereas theoretical criticism proposes an
explicit theory of literary criticism in the sense of basic concepts, as well as a set of terms,
distinctions, and categories that can be used in identifying and assessing literary works, as well
as criteria (standards or norms) by which these works and their authors are to be judged. Here,
the context is equally important. Both of these criticisms are relatively different from each other
due to a number of reasons.They can be opposed because they contradict each other. In practical
criticism we are at full liberty to fully express our ideas, it's purely experimental but in
theoretical criticism there are certain restrictions which terminate our liberty to truly express
ourselves, there is not much ground for experimentation. There's also a difference in language :
imperative language is employed in practical criticism and indicative language is employed in
theoretical criticism. Although both these criticisms differ from each other, having different
views and do oppose each other in some sense both these views are important and play a role in
our understanding and interpretation of literary works.