The Authentic Yoga
The Authentic Yoga
and imitate
a
revolutionary, he was not content to copy
texts, but chose
tne age-old interpretations of the ancient
criticized
was often
Own original path, and for that he
s
during his lifetime.
brilliant
knowledge,
extensive
k n o w n for his intellectual
honestys
to
also
youu,
awareness
of such sublime happiness, which is
develop
approach of Yoga.
nossible through the practical
Kamlesh Patel
29 May 2021
Kanha Shanti Vanam
1
of
The
e traditionalists have generally denied
the status a
8
2
The Yoga Sutras are statement of tacts as they are seen
Sutras lies in
the tact that
of the Yoga
uniqueness
The
at the
world as the
act of looking
they take the primary
vision ot reality).
Darsana (the
foundation of Yoga ot the
very reveals the
nature
seeing itself
Thus the act of seer-seen-vision
(drasta-
as a trinity of
existential situation
drsy a-daTSana).
Each of these three components of reality is distinct from
the other two. But this distinction springs trom a clarity of
vision which has nothing to do with the divisions of space
and time. These divisions appear when ideation intervenes
and usurps the place of pure seeing. These three integral
components emerge as though out of nothing, as a result
of the very act of seeing: they are not man-made or mind
made. The act of seeing is like the act of breathing. A man
goes on breathing whether he is conscious of it or not.
Breathing is an existential activity. To say I breathe' is
ideational. Similarly, to see is an existential activity. But to
say 'I see' is ideational. Actually, that which enables man
to see, inquire, understand, is the 'seer' in the existential
sense of the word. On the other hand, the sense of 'l-am-
ness' or personal identity is a product of the past, which
is totally unrelated to the living present in which reality
abides. Reality 'is' irrespective of what man thinks, teels
ordoesj But ideationally the sense of L-am-ness' usurps
the place of the existential 'seer' and thus becomes the
source of all manner of confusion. When one says, "I am
the seer or the observer, one implicitly includes in this 'T
one's body, senses and mind. But all these are capable oft
being observed either directly, as in the case of the body.
or
through their operations, as in the case of the senses
and the mind. They thus belong to the realm of the 'seen .
The sense of 'lam-ness' is thus
made up of the fusion ot the
seer and the 'seen'
(II-6). It is a concept born ofcontuSion.
The fact is that the energy that enables man to see (k
sakti) and the energy that constitutes
the 'seen' (darsanu
sakti), including mental images and material objects or
10
events, are two distinct energies which constantly interact
with each other. They must never be confused with one
another, nor are they interchangeable. If they were, then
perception itself would collapse altogether and everything
would be reduced to an unintelligible chaos. This is why
Yoga defines the sense of 'l-am-ness' (asmit) as follows:
"To assume that the energy that enables one to see [drk-
saktil and the energy that constitutes the seen [darsana-
saktil are one and the same thing, is a tension called asmita
being as a result of
to moment actually is. This
(avidya) of what from
moment
of the prestigious
maintained by the pressure the m a n
be challenged by
but it c a n
Social conformity, discovering the
interests of
who is willing to
do s o in the
11
truth which underlies his conditioned and conformist way
of living. Such challenging demands freedom. Man knows
that he has freedom to choose. But rarely does he raise the
basic question as to what this freedom means and implies,
despite the fact that his identification with the results of his
choices leads him repeatedly and inevitably into tensions,
conflicts and misery. But anyone who cares to challenge
this situation will be forced to raise the question: what
after all is freedom? Is it restricted to choosing and then
making man a victim of the relentless and vicious logic
of choice-making? Or is there something more implied in
the very nature of freedom? Does freedom to choose also
imply freedom not to choose? It must necessarily be so.
Otherwise the word freedom would lose its very meaning.
It is this momentous discovery that has
inspired the vision
of reality that is Yoga Darsana.
12
It is like a point which has position but no magnitude
(swarupa-sunyamiva, III-3). It is a point on which all things
converge and from which everything acquires a radiant
standstill.
ideational choice-making movement comes to a
Comments that follow
As is explained in the Notes and
comes into being as
this introduction, this is a state that
man's exercising his innate freedom in
the
a result of a
is no egocentric control,
direction of not-choosing. There
of thoughts, or any kind
no suppression or repression
of notchoosing. It is just a
of effort involved in this act
the right direction and of
matter of exercising freedom in
under
existential situation reveal what it may,
letting the
the fiery gaze of pure perception.
following Vyasa,
It is unfortunate that all commentators,
13
tobecome entangled in identification with choices
(urti
sarubya, I-4) and suffer the consequences of the
inevitable
tensions, conflicts and misery which that entails.
The
existential situation offers no other alternatives.
Under the
intluence of this heritage, man takes i tor
granted that he, as a
product
of nature, is totally rate
14
from the objective, phenomenal world.
He therefore
believes that all he can do to understand this
world and
establish a meaningful relationship with it, is to
pick and
choose from it and subject it to a rational scrutiny by the
method ot trial and error.
15
misery, is proof enough that he
land him in unrelieved
foundation for his
discover a sensible and sure
has yet to
situation.
the existential
approach to
way out of
their tentacles, there is no
and finds no
16
3 The right way to free oneself from all tensions
is the way of pratiprasava. This means a journey
of exploration in reverse of going back from the
peripheral surface tensions to their very roots. This
is the way of meditation. In meditation one's mind
remains stationary and only pure perception is
allowed to operate on all the impulses emerging out of
one's conditioned consciousness. Such is the probing
and penetrative power of such perception that the
impulses, as they arise, are seen in their true colours,
with all their egocentric motivations. And because
17
5. It is the clarity of vision born of
intelligence
ence (tian
(viveka),
that enables one to see what is truly meant by h.
words 'seer (drasta) and the word 'seen' (drsya)
or the
objective world. The 'seer is just pure seeing energy
But because of his identification with the sense
of
L-am-ness', man tends to see everything through the
veil of his past experiences (11-20). Thus, the dead
past
overshadows the living present so completely that the
very distinction between the 'seer' and the 'seen' gets
utterly confused and man's vision becomes completely
distorted. He then forgets that the 'seer can never be
the 'seen, and the 'seen' can never be the 'seer'. To
confuse the two in this way is to lose clarity of vision
and to invite endless trouble and misery.
6.
6 The new intelligence (viveka) also discloses what
exactly is meant by the word 'seen':
a The energy that constitutes the 'seen' has three
attributes, namely, inertia, movement and and
illumination; and this energy is wholly distinct
from the energy that makes pure seeing
pOSSiic
which constitutes the 'seer;
b. The seen is compound of
a
organic and inorganic
matter;and
C. the raison d'ête of the existence ot the 'seen is to
offer experiences (bhoga) to the 'seer' and thereby
help man (the experiencer) to liberate himsel
from all bondages (upuavarga) (11-18).
7. Thus, in the view of Yoga, the 'seer at one end
and 'seen at the other end are co-extensive witn
the whole universe, and the existential interactions
between these two embraces the whole mystery of
life and the cosmos. The nature of this interaction is
misunderstood by man so long as he keeps looking at
the world and at himself through the screen of past
experiences. And when the mischief this does to life
is seen and understood, intelligence comes upon the
scene and clarifies the vision. This vision born of
viveka (intelligence) is called vivekakhyati.
connection that
note in this
to
T0. It is pertinent the word
to
Darsana gives special meaning
a
Yoga with
It has nothing to do
intelligence' (viveka).
commonly and loosely
intelligence
the word is
as
intelligence, as it is
life. The word
used in everyday egocentric
nothing but
an
extravaganza
cleverness, or a utopian
11. Again, it must also be noted that
Yoga Darsana.
Darsana reject
all forms of so-called
progress or enrichme
ment of the
human mind and lite that are not rooted
in i
khyati. On the contrary, anything man veka
may do, even
walking on the moon, will, in the absence of vivekven
ka
khyati, not advance him an inch towards the
of his existential identity.
discover
very
21
it is man's vision of 'what ic
3. Second, say the Sutras,
to the mystery
that is decisive for the right approach
man is the end-product
that is reality. This is so because
Mutation once
of the mutational energy of
nature.
ofitself in Man.
of
self-consciousness. Therefore, the search for the
understanding of reality must be pinned down to a
root-finding inquiry into the nature of
man's selt
22
consciousness. And since the conscious
operations, based on the choice-making
brain-mind complex, lie at
the bottom of any vision that man forms and
to about himself and the clings
world, the inquiry into the
reality of things must further be pinned down to the
nature and structure of the
psyche of man.
a
human lite tlowers
into
that avidya-khyati does to
and an existential
vision ot reality.
Tight approach to
carries the
The last part ot the text
called viveka-khyati. attention
further and draws o u r
logic of viveka khyati is born ot
between a mind that
to a clear distinction
23
the impressions of accumulated experiences of
the
past which get activated by memory, on the one
hand
and a mind born of yogic meditation, which is free
of
the domination of the past or the known. The irst
is called pratyayaja or pravrttija citta (11-20; IV.3 to
5), and the second is called dhyanaja citta (IV-6), the
meditational mind.
5. The following is a
summary of what the Sutras say
about þratyayaja or pravrttija citta (conditioned mind)