Energy Savings with Hygroscopic Materials
Energy Savings with Hygroscopic Materials
www.elsevier.com/locate/enbuild
Abstract
Research into dynamic moisture storage in hygroscopic building materials has renewed interest in the moisture buffering capacity of building
materials and shown the potential for these materials to improve indoor humidity, thermal comfort and indoor air quality in buildings. This paper
complements previous research by estimating the effect of hygroscopic materials on energy consumptions in buildings. The results show that it may
be possible to reduce heating and cooling energy consumption by up to 5% and 30%, respectively, when applying hygroscopic materials with well-
controlled HVAC systems. The paper also describes two different experimental facilities that can be used to measure accurately the moisture
buffering capacity of hygroscopic building materials. These facilities provide different convective transfer coefficients between the hygroscopic
material and ambient air, ranging from natural convection in small, sealed jars to fully developed laminar and turbulent forced convection. The
paper presents a numerical model and property data for spruce plywood which will be used in a companion paper [O.F. Osanyintola, P. Talukdar,
C.J. Simonson, Effect of initial conditions, boundary conditions and thickness on the moisture buffering capacity of spruce plywood, Energy and
Buildings (2006), doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.024.] to provide additional insight into the design of an experiment to measure the moisture
buffering capacity of hygroscopic materials.
# 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Moisture buffering capacity; Energy savings; Experimental facility; Uncertainty; Indoor air quality; Convective transfer coefficients; Spruce plywood
1. Introduction provides comfort and air quality near desired levels, while
consuming less energy than traditional methodologies.
In recent times, there has been increasing interest to reduce Furthermore, humidity is an important parameter in emergency
the energy consumption and green house gas emissions shelters [8] and supermarkets [9]. The RH is often too high for
associated with the use of mechanical (active) HVAC systems comfort in shelters that are passively heated by occupants and
in buildings. In view of this, researchers are investigating the solar gains even during cold weather, while the RH in
use of passive systems to assist or even eliminate some aspects supermarkets may vary significantly and is often closely linked
of these active systems or to control active systems more to the outdoor temperature. The indoor RH affects the
efficiently. One important aspect is moderating the indoor refrigeration load of freezer rooms and display cases and as
variations in relative humidity (RH) in buildings because indoor a result, indoor RH must be included when designing energy
humidity affects warm respiratory comfort [2], skin humidity recovery for supermarket refrigeration systems [9]. In addition,
[3] and perceived indoor air quality [4]. Also, moisture in conservation researchers have shown that a wide variety of
buildings has been shown to affect the sensible and latent artifacts displayed in museums require specific indoor
conduction loads [5] and may cause deteriorations in buildings conditions to minimize their deterioration. Yu et al. [10]
[6]. A recent study [7] included indoor RH as one of the control investigated the use of silica gel as an absorbent to control
parameters in a new HVAC control methodology which humidity in museums.
Due to the importance of indoor humidity, several
researchers [11–20] have studied the use of various hygroscopic
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.024.
materials to moderate indoor humidity levels. These studies
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 306 966 5479; fax: +1 306 966 5427. have included laboratory, field and numerical studies and have
E-mail address: Carey.Simonson@usask.ca (C.J. Simonson). shown that hygroscopic materials are able to moderate the
0378-7788/$ – see front matter # 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.026
O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282 1271
Plywood is a common building material that gains or This facility tests a small sample of spruce plywood
releases moisture and heat as the outdoor and indoor conditions (60 mm 60 mm 9 mm) using glass jars containing still air
change. It is manufactured from different species of peeled and saturated salt solutions (as shown in Fig. 2). In this facility,
wood veneers, such as spruce, oak and pine. These veneers are both faces of the plywood are exposed to the air in the jar, which
glued together, layer by layer, to form a panel. Plywood creates an impermeable layer at half the thickness of the
products are produced to be able to withstand extreme weather plywood. The numerical model, presented in Section 4, uses a
conditions by using phenolic formaldehyde resin in the gluing convection boundary condition at x = 0 and an impermeable
process. boundary condition at x = L. Therefore, an effective thickness
All wood products contain moisture, from saturated fresh cut (L) defined as the distance between the surface experiencing
logs to the fairly dry wooden indoor structures and furniture. convective moisture transfer and the impermeable plane in the
Moisture in wood is stored as either bound water or free water. test specimen is introduced and will be used throughout this
Bound water is held within cell walls by bonding forces paper. It will be useful when comparing the results of the two
between water and cellulose molecules. Free water is contained facilities in the companion of this paper [1]. In the glass jar
in the cell lumens/cavities and is held by surface tension. A facility, the effective thickness (L) for moisture penetration is
microscopic view of wood is shown in Fig. 1. Since plywood 4.5 mm from each exposed side.
veneers are made by rotating the log and peeling a thin veneer Prior to testing, the plywood needs to be conditioned to a
from the log, moisture transfer in the veneer in the direction of uniform moisture content. In this paper, the plywood samples
the thin dimension is equivalent to moisture transfer in the are conditioned for a long time (2 months) in the laboratory and
radial direction of the log. When these veneers are assembled the initial moisture content of the wood is 0.028 kg/kg, which
and used in buildings and furniture, the moisture transfer corresponds to a relative humidity of about 55%. The plywood
through the exposed surface and into the plywood is equivalent sample is then placed in a jar containing a saturated solution
to moisture transfer in the radial direction of the original log. and the jars are kept in an environmental chamber that is
Therefore, the direction of moisture transfer considered in this maintained at 23.3 0.3 8C during the test. The plywood is
paper is across the cell walls and lumens (in the radial direction subjected to a step change in relative humidity by moving it to a
of the original log) as shown in Fig. 1. Because of the rotary jar with a different salt solution. NaCl is used to create the high
peeled veneers, plywood will have more uniform moisture humidity condition, which creates a humidity of 75.3 0.1%
transfer characteristics than raw timber for example, which will RH at 23 8C [48] and MgCl2 is used to create the low humidity
have moisture transfer in directions that are both radial and condition, which creates a humidity of 33.1 0.2% RH at
tangential to the wood grains. Therefore, plywood is a good
material for the experimental and numerical investigation of
moisture buffering capacity.
3. Experimental facilities
Fig. 4. (a) Schematic of the TMT facility showing spruce plywood and the sensors and (b) picture showing the spruce plywood held together by nylon screws inside
the Lexan container.
1274 O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282
Table 1
Summary of the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients at different
Reynolds numbers in the TMT facility
Reynolds number, Re
1000 2000 4000
Convective heat transfer 2.5 0.2 3.5 0.2 8.1 0.4
coefficient, ha (W/(m2 K))
Convective mass transfer 2.1 0.2 2.9 0.2 6.7 0.3
coefficient, hm (103 m/s)
The coupled partial differential equations are discretized 5.1. Direct energy savings
using the finite difference method with second order accuracy for
the spatial nodes and the implicit scheme for the time derivative. 5.1.1. Heating energy
For the spatial nodes at the boundary, the backward or forward In the heating season, direct energy savings are possible
scheme is used for the discretization, while the central scheme is because moisture accumulation in hygroscopic materials
used for the central nodes. To provide a stable solution, an under releases 2.5 kJ/kg of moisture, which will decrease the required
relaxed, Gauss–Seidel iteration method is used and the solution is heating energy. Since humans are an important source of
considered to have converged, when for any time step, the change moisture in buildings, this moisture accumulation will occur
in any dependent variable (T, rv ) is less than 106. A sensitivity during occupation. The energy required to heat the 12 m2
study showed that a uniform grid size of 0.1 mm and a time step bedroom [11] with one west-facing external wall (150 mm
of 30 s provide a numerically accurate solution. Decreasing the insulation) during the occupied hours (22:00–7:00) is presented
grid size to 0.05 mm and the time step to 10 s changes the in Fig. 9(a) for the hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic cases. In the
O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282 1277
Fig. 9. The heat generated during moisture accumulation in hygroscopic building materials (a) decreases the heating energy consumption during occupation (22:00–
7:00), but (b) has a small affect on the total energy consumption during the heating season.
simulations, the heating power is adjusted to keep the bedroom Hindoor is the indoor enthalpy and Hdesired is the desired indoor
between 20 and 21 8C during the heating season, which was set to enthalpy. Cooling the room is expected to increase the humidity
be from 1.9 to 31.5 in Finland and from 1.10 to 30.4 in Belgium of the indoor air and building materials and will likely increase
and Germany. The average indoor temperature was 20.7 8C in the moisture transfer from that calculated in [11] because the
Finland and 20.5 8C in Belgium and Germany. Fig. 9(a) shows slope of the sorption curve typically increases with increasing
that the energy consumption during occupation is about 10% humidity. These effects are neglected here.
lower in the hygroscopic case than in the non-hygroscopic case, The calculated cooling energy and demand are presented in
which means that moisture accumulation in the building Fig. 11 when the desired indoor enthalpy is 47 kJ/kg, which
materials during occupation can decrease the needed heating would result in a percent dissatisfied of 32% if the air was
energy. On the other hand, energy is needed to dry this moisture unpolluted [4]. This is comparable to the recommended
from these materials during unoccupied periods and the net result perceived air quality of 2.5 dp (30% dissatisfied) [38].
is that the total energy consumption during the heating season is Fig. 11 shows that the required cooling energy is quite low
nearly equal for both cases (Fig. 9(b)). The slightly higher total for the bedroom because the only internal heat loads are
heating energy consumption in the hygroscopic case is likely due 100 W of lighting for 1 h and two people for 9 h. Never-
to a slightly higher thermal conductivity due to higher material theless, the required cooling energy during occupation is
moisture contents in the hygroscopic case. The results in Fig. 9 lower (from 10% in Italy to 35% in Finland) with hygroscopic
show that it may be possible to save heating energy with materials than with non-hygroscopic materials as shown in
hygroscopic materials, but a control strategy is required to realize Fig. 11(a). The peak cooling demand is also lower (from 10%
these savings. Such control strategies could be temperature and in Italy to 30% in Finland, Fig. 11(c)) with hygroscopic
ventilation set back during unoccupied periods. materials than with non-hygroscopic materials. Similarly as
was discussed with the heating energy savings, a control
5.1.2. Cooling energy strategy is needed to realize these savings because they
During the cooling season, hygroscopic materials are able to represent the energy consumption and demand during
reduce the indoor humidity and consequently reduce the indoor occupied hours.
enthalpy [11]. Decreasing the enthalpy of indoor air decreases Fig. 11(b) shows that the savings in cooling energy
the energy required to cool the building and also improves the consumption for all hours during the year are lower than
indoor air quality [4,36,37]. The potential for hygroscopic during occupation which is similar to the findings of Fairey and
materials to reduce cooling energy consumption can be Kerestecioglu [39]. Simulation results [39] show that if a
estimated from the calculated indoor enthalpy. The bedroom building is continuously conditioned regardless of occupation,
studied by Simonson et al. [11] had no cooling, but the energy the cooling energy savings due to hygroscopic mass are in the
required to cool the room to a desired enthalpy of 47 kJ/kg order of 5% (for the month of July in Atlanta, GA), but if
(24 8C and 50% RH) can be estimated by the multiplying the ventilation and cooling are controlled according to occupation
area under the curve in Fig. 10 with the ventilation rate greater savings can be realized. It is expected that a control
(0.5 ach = 4.5 L/s) according to strategy to optimize the benefits of hygroscopic mass would be
Z similar to that recommended to optimize the benefits of thermal
Q ¼ ṁventilation DH dt (11) mass for the cooling of buildings (e.g. [40–42]). Peak cooling
loads can be reduced by as much as 50% by precooling the
where building mass during unoccupied periods [41], but such savings
can be overestimated if the moisture adsorbed in the building
DH ¼ Hindoor Hdesired (12) structure and furnishings during unoccupied periods is not
1278 O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282
Fig. 10. Frequency distribution of the difference between indoor enthalpy and an enthalpy of 47 kJ/kg during occupied hours. The shaded regions are proportional to
the energy required to cool the room to 24 8C and 50% RH (47 kJ/kg).
included [39]. Nevertheless, it is not unreasonable to expect occupation. The relative heating/cooling energy savings are
peak cooling load reductions of 10–30% when hygroscopic relative to the total heating/cooling energy consumption (i.e.,
materials are applied, as shown in Fig. 11(c). This could have a including both occupied and unoccupied hours) and are
large impact on the size, cost and efficiency of cooling therefore lower than the relative savings presented previously.
equipment in buildings.
5.2. Indirect energy savings
5.1.3. Summary of direct savings
Fig. 12 summarizes the magnitude of the potential savings of The main purpose of conditioning buildings it to provide an
heating and cooling energy considering the occupied hours and indoor environment that is comfortable and an indoor air
all hours. In the case including only occupied hours, it is quality that is acceptable, where temperature, humidity and
assumed that the HVAC control system is optimized to take ventilation (among other factors) affect comfort and air quality
advantage of the lower heating and cooling loads during [2–4,43]. Therefore, since hygroscopic materials can improve
Fig. 11. Cooling energy required to cool the bedroom to an enthalpy of 47 kJ/kg (24 8C and 50% RH) during (a) occupation and (b) all hours, and (c) cooling demand
during occupation.
O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282 1279
Fig. 12. Potential direct (a) heating and (b) and cooling energy savings when applying hygroscopic materials. The percent savings are relative to the total heating or
cooling energies.
indoor humidity conditions, it may be possible to alter the still provide a comparable IAQ. Simonson et al. [12] found that
temperature and outdoor ventilation rate of buildings that use even larger ventilation reductions were possible, ranging from
hygroscopic materials and still provide a similar comfort and 20% to 90% depending on the criteria selected. Even though
indoor air quality as in buildings without hygroscopic materials more research is needed before ventilation reductions can be
[12]. safely brought into practice, Fig. 13 presents the savings that
could result with a modest estimation of a 15% reduction in
5.2.1. Reducing outdoor ventilation ventilation rate. Here it is important to note that decreasing the
Research has quantified the effect of humidity on perceived ventilation rate is expected to have a greater effect on IAQ as
air quality and warm respiratory comfort using laboratory the ventilation rate decreases [44]. Meanwhile, decreasing the
experiments [2,4]. In addition, these findings have been ventilation rate is expected to have a smaller effect on energy
confirmed in a field study where it was found that the consumption as the ventilation rate decreases.
perceived indoor air quality was moderately better at a Reducing the ventilation rate by 15% would have a
ventilation rate of 3.5 L/s per person and an indoor enthalpy of significant impact on the energy consumption in Finland and
35 kJ/kg (20 8C/40% RH) than at a ventilation rate of 10 L/s per could save an estimated 3 TWh/a of heating energy and
person and an indoor enthalpy of 45 kJ/kg (23 8C/50% RH) 0.6 TWh/a of electricity (Fig. 13(a)). These savings are based
[37]. Therefore, the perceived indoor air quality will be similar on the estimated heating and electricity consumption due to
if the ventilation is reduced by 75% and the indoor enthalpy ventilation (21 and 4 TWh/a, respectively) presented by
decreased by 10 kJ/kg. Since the average indoor enthalpy is Seppänen [45].
about 2 kJ/kg (1.9 kJ/kg in Finland and Belgium, 1.7 kJ/kg in In a case study in Austin, Texas, it was found that reducing
Germany and 1.5 kJ/kg in Italy) lower during occupation in the the outdoor ventilation rate increased comfort and reduced the
hygroscopic case than in the non-hygroscopic case [11], the measured energy consumption in a 9200 m2 office building
ventilation rate in buildings with hygroscopic materials could [46]. To improve the indoor air quality in the building, the
possibly be reduced by 15% (i.e., 2 kJ/kg (75%/10 kJ/kg)) and outdoor ventilation rate was reduced by 86% (from 74 to 10 L/s
Fig. 13. Possible energy savings in (a) Finnish buildings and (b) an office building in Austin, Texas due to reducing the ventilation rate by 15%.
1280 O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282
per person). Decreasing the ventilation rate, decreased the peak not an important comfort parameter at low temperatures, but
indoor relative humidity from 70% to 55% and resulted in a has a strong effect on the risk of condensation and mould
significant improvement in comfort conditions during the growth during the heating season [44]. The average indoor
summer. In addition to improving comfort, the reduced temperature in the hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic cases of
ventilation rate decreased heating energy use by 48%, Simonson et al. [11] are nearly identical (less than 0.2 8C
electricity use by 21% and total energy use by 27%. Assuming difference). On the other hand, the indoor temperature in the
that the decrease in energy use is proportional to the decrease in hygroscopic case can be reduced by an average of 1.6 8C in
ventilation rate, a 15% reduction in ventilation rate would Finland and Belgium and 1.5 8C in Germany, while maintaining
reduce the heating energy consumption by 8% and the total the same indoor relative humidity during the occupied hours of
energy consumption by 5% (Fig. 13(b)). It is interesting to note the heating season. The potential energy savings due to a
that the percent savings in heating energy are similar in Finland reduced indoor temperature are estimated by multiplying the
and in Texas. ratio of the temperature reduction (1.5 or 1.6 8C) to the average
Woloszyn et al. [47] present the numerical analysis of a two- temperature difference between indoors and outdoors by the
bedroom apartment (140 m3, 60 m2) for one evening (19:00– heating energy used during occupation. Since the average
0:00) in a mild humid climate using the mean January climate of temperature difference between indoors and outdoors during
Macon, France. Macon is in east-central France and the average the occupied hours of the heating season are 21.6, 18.9 and
outdoor conditions during the simulation where 3 8C and 93% 21.3 8C in Finland, Belgium and Germany, the estimated
RH (4.4 g/kg). Woloszyn et al. [47] compared the indoor heating energy savings due to reducing the indoor temperature
humidity and energy consumption of the apartment for two cases. are 2% of the total heating energy (7–9% of the heating during
One case is where the moisture buffering capacity of the structure occupation) as shown in Fig. 14(a).
and furnishings is included in the simulation and the other case is
where the moisture buffering capacity is neglected. The 5.2.3. Increasing indoor temperature in the summer
apartment had a mechanical ventilation system and a ventilation In the summer, the perceived air quality (PAQ) and warm
rate that varies between 0.12 and 0.7 ach depending on the indoor respiratory comfort during occupation may be significantly
relative humidity. The simulation results show that the indoor poorer in a building with non-hygroscopic materials than in a
humidity in the kitchen and living room is over 15% RH greater building with hygroscopic materials [36]. As a result, it is
in the non-hygroscopic case than in the hygroscopic case, even possible to allow the indoor temperature in a building with
though the average ventilation rate is about 10% higher in the hygroscopic materials to be higher than in a building with non-
non-hygroscopic case than in the hygroscopic case. The total hygroscopic materials and still have comparable indoor
energy consumption during the 6 h period is 45% higher in the comfort and air quality. Increasing the indoor temperatures
non-hygroscopic case than in the hygroscopic case. New will reduce the energy needed for cooling the building during
ventilation units that control the ventilation rate based on warm weather. The results of Simonson et al. [11] show that the
measured humidity and CO2 could result in additional savings for indoor temperature can be increased by about 1 8C in a
buildings with hygroscopic materials. hygroscopic building and yet provide similar conditions of
warm respiratory comfort. Similarly, a hygroscopic building
5.2.2. Reducing indoor temperature in the winter can have up to 2 8C higher indoor temperature than a non-
Since the indoor humidity during occupation is reduced hygroscopic building and still have similar perceived indoor air
when applying hygroscopic materials, the indoor temperature quality. The energy savings that could result from such a
can be reduced and yet result in the same indoor relative temperature change are estimated by changing Hdesired in
humidity. Here it is important to note that relative humidity is Eq. (12) and the results are in Fig. 14(b).
Fig. 14. Possible energy savings when the indoor temperature in the hygroscopic case is (a) decreased while maintaining the same indoor relative humidity as in the
non-hygroscopic case, and (b) increased while maintaining the same comfort and air quality conditions as in the non-hygroscopic case.
O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282 1281
Table 2 facility and are known within 10%. The bias uncertainty in
Potential reductions in the total consumption (%) of heating and cooling energy
the measurement of moisture accumulation is 0.4 using the
when applying hygroscopic materials in buildings
glass jar facility 1.1 g/m2 using the TMT facility.
Heating Cooling The potential for hygroscopic materials to reduce energy
Direct energy savings consumption in buildings is also presented in this paper. The most
Optimized control of 2–3 5–30 promising energy savings are for buildings with mechanical
HVAC system cooling equipment located in hot and humid climates, but there
No control of HVAC system 0 0–20
are potential savings in all climates if the HVAC system can be
Reduction in energy demand 0 10–30
optimally controlled to regulate the indoor climate, comfort and
Indirect energy savings air quality. The results show that moisture transfer has the
Reducing ventilation rate 5 5
Changing indoor temperature 2 2–10% (comfort),
potential to reduce the energy consumption of buildings
5–20% (PAQ) ‘‘directly’’ and ‘‘indirectly’’. Direct savings are defined as
savings in the heating and cooling of a building that result when
applying hygroscopic materials. Indirect savings are defined as
5.3. Summary of potential energy savings savings that result from adjusting the ventilation rate and indoor
temperature while maintaining adequate indoor air quality and
The approximate potential energy savings calculated by comfort with hygroscopic materials. The potential direct energy
different methods is summarized in Table 2 as a percentage of savings are small for heating (2–3% of the total heating energy),
the total heating or cooling energies. It is important to note that but significant for cooling (5–30% of the total cooling energy).
these values are estimates based on numerical results of These savings require the integration of hygroscopic materials
Simonson et al. [11,12] and a few, mainly numerical, studies and a well-controlled HVAC system. The potential indirect
reported in the literature [37,39,45–47] and must be used with savings for heating are in the order of 5%, while they range from 5
caution. to 20% for cooling.
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Based on the literature reviewed in this paper, the moisture
The experimental test facilities presented in this paper have
storage capacity of hygroscopic materials during transient been developed with funding from the Canada Foundation for
changes in ambient air relative humidity (moisture buffering
Innovation (CFI) and testing was funded by the Natural
capacity) is an important parameter that requires further
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
research into standard test methods and facilities that can
(NSERC) Discovery Grant program and Special Research
quantify it accurately and repeatably. To help with this standard
Opportunities program. The energy impact study was funded by
development, two different test facilities are developed and
Wood Focus Oy. The financial assistance of CFI, NSERC and
presented in this paper together with a numerical model, which
Wood Focus are greatly appreciated.
can be used to compare the results from these different
facilities. The model can also be used to investigate other test
conditions and materials and help formulate a testing standard. References
Since the experimental facilities and numerical model will be
applied in a companion paper [1] to investigate the moisture [1] O.F. Osanyintola, P. Talukdar, C.J. Simonson, Effect of initial conditions,
boundary conditions and thickness on the moisture buffering capacity
buffering capacity of spruce plywood, the thermal and moisture of spruce plywood, Energy and Buildings 38 (10) (2006) 1283–1292.
transfer properties of spruce plywood are included in this paper. [2] J. Toftum, A.S. Jorgensen, P.O. Fanger, Upper limits of air humidity for
Both of these facilities described in this paper are able to preventing warm respiratory discomfort, Energy and Buildings 28 (1998)
provide well-controlled temperature and humidity boundary 15–23.
[3] J. Toftum, A.S. Jorgensen, P.O. Fanger, Upper limits for indoor air
conditions for the hygroscopic material being investigated and
humidity to avoid uncomfortably humid skin, Energy and Buildings 28
permit these boundary conditions to be changed rapidly. One (1998) 1–13.
facility (termed the glass jar facility) uses a hanging mass [4] L. Fang, G. Clausen, P.O. Fanger, Impact of temperature and humidity on
balance and small, sealed jars containing saturated salt the perception of indoor air quality, Indoor Air 8 (1998) 80–90.
solutions located in a controlled environmental chamber. The [5] N. Mendes, F.C. Winkelmann, R. Lamberts, P.C. Philippi, Moisture
other facility (termed the transient moisture transfer (TMT) effects on conduction loads, Energy and Buildings 35 (2003) 631–
644.
facility) is more complex and provides fully developed air flow [6] F. Lucas, L. Adelard, F. Garde, H. Boyer, Study of moisture in buildings
above the hygroscopic material using a small scale wind tunnel for hot humid climates, Energy and Buildings 34 (2002) 345–355.
connected to an environmental chamber. The glass jar facility [7] S. Atthajariyakul, T. Leephakpreeda, Real-time determination of optimal
provides more constant humidity conditions and is able to indoor-air condition for thermal comfort, air quality and efficient energy
change these conditions more rapidly than the TMT facility, but usage, upper limits for indoor air humidity to avoid uncomfortably humid
skin, Energy and Buildings 36 (7) (2004) 720–733.
is limited to investigate natural convection moisture transfer [8] C. Crawford, P. Manfield, A. McRobie, Assessing the thermal perfor-
and small samples. On the other hand, the air flow and mance of an emergency shelter system, Energy and Buildings 37 (5)
convective transfer coefficients are well controlled in the TMT (2005) 471–483.
1282 O.F. Osanyintola, C.J. Simonson / Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 1270–1282
[9] J. Arias, P. Lundqvist, Heat recovery and floating condensing in super- [27] JIS A 1470-1. Test method of adsorption/desorption efficiency for build-
markets, Energy and Buildings 38 (2) (2006) 73–81. ing materials to regulate an indoor humidity-Part 1: Response method of
[10] D. Yu, S.A. Klein, D.T. Reindl, An evaluation of silica gel for humidity humidity, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 2002.
control in display cases, WAAC Newsletter 23 (2.) (2001). [28] D.J. Gardner, The relevance of surface properties & wood finishes to the
[11] C.J. Simonson, M. Salonvaara, T. Ojanen, Improving indoor climate and wood science & technology research community, in: Proceedings of the
comfort with wooden structures, VTT Building Technology, Espoo: VTT Second SWST Annual Fundamental Disciplines Session, 2004 http://
Publications 431, http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2001/P431.pdf, www.swst.org/meetings/AM04/Gardner.pdf.
VTT Building and Transport, 2001. [29] ISO, Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices,
[12] C.J. Simonson, M. Salonvaara, T. Ojanen, Moderating indoor conditions ISO 5176-1, Switzerland, 1991.
with hygroscopic building materials and outdoor ventilation, ASHRAE [30] M. Kaviany, Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media, Springer-
Transactions 110 (2) (2004) 804–819. Verlag, New York, 1991.
[13] C.J. Simonson, S.O. Olutimayin, M. Salonvaara, T. Ojanen, J. O’Connor, [31] H.M. Kuenzel, Simultaneous Heat and Moisture Transport in Building
Potential for hygroscopic building materials to improve indoor comfort Components—One-and Two-dimensional Calculation using Simple
and air quality in the Canadian climate, in: Proceedings (CD) of the Parameters, IRB Verlag, Fraunhofer-Informationszentrum Raum and
Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings IX Interna- Bau, Stuttgart, Germany, 1995.
tional Conference, Clearwater Beach, FL, December 5–10, 2004, 15 pp. [32] O.F. Osanyintola, Transient moisture characteristics of spruce ply-
[14] C.J. Simonson, M. Salonvaara, T. Ojanen, Heat and mass transfer between wood, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Univer-
indoor air and a permeable and hygroscopic building envelope. Part I. sity of Saskatchewan, 2005, http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/
Field measurements, Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science etd-12222005-082100/.
28 (1) (2004) 63–101. [33] L. Wadso, K. Svennberg, A. Dueck, An experimentally simple method for
[15] A.H. Holm, H.M. Kunzel, K. Sedlbauer, Predicting indoor temperature measuring sorption isotherms, Drying Technology 22 (10) (2004) 2427–
and humidity conditions including hygrothermal interactions with the 2440.
building envelope, ASHRAE Transactions 110 (2) (2004) 820–826. [34] ASTM, Standard test method for steady-state heat flux measurement and
[16] C. Rode, T. Mitamura, J. Shultz, T. Padfield, Test cell measurements of thermal transmission properties by means of the heat flow meter apparatus,
moisture buffer effects, in: Proceedings of the Sixth Nordic Building ASTM C 518, Philadelphia, 2003.
Physics Symposium, Trondheim, Norway, (2002), pp. 619–626. [35] ASTM, Standard test method for water vapor transmission of materials,
[17] R. Peukhuri, C. Rode, K.K. Hansen, Moisture buffering capacity of ASTM E96/E96M, Philadelphia, 2005.
different insulation materials, in: Proceedings (CD) of the Performance [36] C.J. Simonson, M. Salonvaara, T. Ojanen, The effect of structures on
of Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings IX International Conference, indoor humidity—possibility to improve comfort and perceived air qual-
Clearwater Beach, FL, USA, 2004, 14 pp. ity, Indoor Air 12 (2002) 243–251.
[18] M. Salonvaara, T. Ojanen, A. Holm, H.M. Kunzel, A.N. Karagiozis, [37] L. Fang, P. Wargocki, T. Witterseh, G. Clausen, P.O. Fanger, Field study on
Moisture buffering effects on indoor air quality—experimental and simu- the impact of temperature, humidity and ventilation on perceived air
lation results, in: Proceedings (CD) of the Performance of Exterior quality, in: Proceedings of the Indoor Air’99, vol. 2, Edinburgh, (1999),
Envelopes of Whole Buildings IX International Conference, Clearwater pp. 107–112.
Beach, FL, 2004, 11 pp. [38] CEN, Ventilation for buildings—design criteria for the indoor environ-
[19] K. Svennberg, L. Hedegaard, C. Rode, Moisture buffer performance of a ment, European Committee for Standardization, Report CR 1752, 1988.
fully furnished room, in: Proceedings (CD) of the Performance of Exterior [39] P.W. Fairey, A.A. Kerestecioglu, Dynamic modeling of combined thermal
Envelopes of Whole Buildings IX International Conference, Clearwater and moisture transport in buildings: effect on cooling loads and space
Beach, FL, 2004, 11 pp. conditions, ASHRAE Transactions 91 (2A) (1985) 461–472.
[20] S. Hameury, Moisture buffering capacity of heavy timber structures [40] K. Keeney, J.E. Braun, A simplified method for determining optimal
directly exposed to an indoor climate: a numerical study, Buildings cooling control strategies for thermal storage in building mass, Interna-
and Environment 40 (2005) 1400–1412. tional Journal of HVAC&R Research 2 (1) (1996) 59–78.
[21] C.J. Simonson, Energy consumption and ventilation performance of a [41] I. Andresen, M.J. Brandemuehl, Heat storage in building thermal mass—a
naturally ventilated ecological house in a cold climate, Energy and parametric study, ASHRAE Transactions 98 (1) (1992) 910–918.
Buildings 37 (1) (2005) 23–35. [42] J.E. Braun, Reducing energy costs and peak electrical demand through
[22] J. Liu, Y. Aizawa, H. Yoshino, Experimental and numerical study on optimal control of building thermal storage, ASHRAE Transactions 96 (2)
indoor temperature and humidity with free water surface, Energy and (1990) 876–888.
Buildings 37 (4) (2005) 383–388. [43] ASHRAE, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy,
[23] S. Hameury, T. Lundstrom, Contribution of indoor exposed massive wood ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, Atlanta, 2004.
to a good indoor climate: in situ measurement campaign, Energy and [44] J. Sundell, What we know, and what don’t know about sick building
Buildings 36 (2004) 281–292. syndrome, ASHRAE Journal 38 (6) (1996) 51–57.
[24] S. Olutimayin, C.J. Simonson, Measuring and modeling vapor boundary [45] O. Seppänen, Estimated cost of indoor climate in Finnish buildings, in:
layer growth during transient diffusion heat and moisture transfer in Proceedings of the Indoor Air’99, vol. 4, Edinburgh, (1999), pp. 13–18.
cellulose insulation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer [46] M. Liu, Y. Zhu, B.Y. Park, D.E. Claridge, D.K. Feary, Airflow reduction to
48 (2005) 3319–3330. improve building comfort and reduce energy consumption—a case study,
[25] C. Rode, A. Holm, T. Padfield, A review of humidity buffering in the ASHRAE Transactions 105 (1) (1999) 384–390.
interior spaces, Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science 27 (3) [47] M. Woloszyn, G. Rusaouën, G. Fraisse, J.-L. Hubert, Predicting indoor
(2004) 221–226. climate using electric analogy estimations of condensation potential, in:
[26] C. Rode, R. Peuhkuri, K.K. Hansen, B. Time, K. Svennberg, J. Arfvidsson, Proceedings of the Healthy Buildings 2000, vol. 3, Helsinki, (2000), pp.
T. Ojanen, Moisture buffer value of materials in buildings, in: Proceedings 165–170.
of the Nordic Building Physics Conference vol. 1, Reykjavı́k, Iceland, [48] ASTM, Maintaining constant relative humidity by means of aqueous
June 13–15, 2005, pp. 108–115. solutions, ASTM E 104, Philadelphia, 1985.