APPENDIX F

SECURITY INSPECTION CHECKLIST

This Security Inspection Checklist should be used as discussed in Chapter 1, paragraph

1-206, when conducting self reviews. Each checklist should be marked with the
appropriate security classification markings and declassification instructions. Core
Compliance Items (CCI) are identified in blue italic font. (Note: In addition to the
references provided, local Activity or individual Agency/Component Service policy,
procedures, and regulations may also apply).

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A

A. SECURITY MANAGEMENT
A-1 Has the contractor implemented the provisions of
the JAFAN 6-0 on initial contract award or
modification or subsequent modification? (Note:
6/0: 1-102c &
Implementation must be within 6 months of
Foreword
publication of the JAFAN 6-0 via a Contract
Security Classification Specification (DD Form
254))
A-2 Are requests for waivers to established SAP policies
and procedures only submitted when they are in the 6/0: 1-106a
best interest of the Government?
A-3 In those cases where waivers are required, has the
waiver request been submitted to the service
6/0: 1-106b
component SAPCO or designee via the PSO's chain
of command?
A-4 Within 90 days of electing to implement
commensurate protective measures, has the PSO
notified the service component SAPCO of the 6/0: 1-107
commensurate level of protection and requested
validation/final approval?
A-5 Are PSOs appointed, in writing, by the SAPCO or
6/0: 1-200a(1)
designee?
A-6 Are GSSOs appointed, in writing, and assigned to
specific facilities/projects/ subcompartments? Are 6/0: 1-200a(2)
copies of appointment letters provided to the PSO?
A-7 Are CPSOs appointed, in writing, and assigned to
specific facilities/projects/ subcompartments? Are 6/0: 1-200a(2)
copies of appointment letters provided to the PSO?
A-8 Does the SAP Security Officer have the position,
responsibility, and authority commensurate with the 6/0: 1-200b
degree of SAP security support required?
A-9 Has the GSSO/CPSO prepared comprehensive
SOPs to implement the security policies & 6/0: 1-201
requirements unique to their facilities?
A-10 Are proposed SOPs and SOP changes forwarded to
6/0: 1-201
the PSO for approval?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 1

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
A-11 Has an annual self-inspection been conducted by
GSSO/CPSO (as appropriate) and did it address
6/0: 1-206d
issues reflected in the "Security Inspections
Checklist" found in JAFAN 6-0, Appendix F?
A-12 Are self-inspection reports submitted to the PSO
within 30 days following completion of the 6/0: 1-206d
inspection?
A-13 Is the PSO notified immediately if the inspection
discloses the loss, compromise or suspected 6/0: 1-206d
compromise of classified material?
A-14 Are self-inspection reports retained for two years
following the formal government CSA inspection? 6/0: 1-206d

A-15 Are all outstanding items (i.e., those with on-going

corrective actions) completed prior to the 6/0: 1-206d
destruction of the self-inspection?
A-16 Are instances of Government and Industry fraud,
waste, abuse and corruption reported through
6/0: 1-207
channels designated by the service component
SAPCO?
A-17 Is the name and telephone number for the current
FWAC manager or monitor prominently displayed 6/0: 1-207b
throughout each SAPF?
A-18 If multiple SAPs are located within a SAPF, has a
CUA been executed between PSOs prior to 6/0: 1-210
occupancy?
A-19 Where there is co-utilization of SCI within a SAPF,
or SAP within a SCIF, has authorization from the 6/0: 1-210b
PSO & the servicing SSO been obtained?
A-20 Are the GPM and PSO notified in advance of any
6/0: 1-300f
Arms Control Treaty Visits?
A-21 Is the PSO made aware of any litigation actions that
may pertain to the SAP, to include the physical
6/0: 1-300g
environments, facilities or personnel or as otherwise
directed by the GPM?
A-22 Are all security violations reported within 24 hours
of discovery to the CPSO/GSSO/PSO, as 6/0: 1-301
appropriate?
A-23 Are violations involving contractor personnel
reported by the PSO using the appropriate Defense 6/0: 1-301
Security Service (DSS) SAP channels?
A-24 Has the PSO promptly advised the service
component SAPCO in all instances where national
security concerns would impact on collateral 6/0: 1-301
security programs or clearances of program-
accessed individuals?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 2

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
A-25 Has the security official of the affected facility
determined the scope of the corrective action taken
6/0: 1-301
in response to a security infraction/violation and
reported it to the PSO?
A-26 Are security infractions documented and made
6/0: 1-301a(2)
available for review by the PSO during visits?
B. SECURITY PLANNING
B-1 When a badge system is considered necessary has it
been documented in the facility SOP & address
6/0: 1-202
topics such as badge accountability, storage,
inventory, disposition, destruction, format & use?
B-2 Is a badge system in place to permit total personal
identification & access level determinations (unless
6/0: 1-202
the program area is small enough (normally less
than 25 people))?
B-3 When all individuals within a SAPF cannot be
personally identified, has a badging system been 6/0: 1-202
implemented by the PSO?
B-4 Are TEMPEST Requirement Questionnaires (TRQ)
submitted when processing data on an information 6/0: 10-100b
system?
B-5 Has the PSO, with guidance from a CTTA,
determined if countermeasures are required based 6/0: 10-100b
upon the completed TRQ?
B-6 Are OPSEC plans/surveys accomplished to identify,
define, and develop countermeasures to 6/0: 10-400
vulnerabilities?
C. PERSONNEL SECURITY
C-1 Does the GSSO/CPSO possess a personnel security
clearance at least equal to the highest level of
6/0: 1-200c(1) &
classified information for which they require
(2)
access? Possess access to all SAPs assigned to the
facility(s) for which he/she is responsible?
C-2 Do personnel possess access to all SAPs assigned to 6/0: 1-200c(4)
the facility(s) for which he/she is responsible?
C-3 Are all briefed personnel reporting to the PSO any
information which may adversely reflect on the
6/0: 1-300a
Program-briefed employee's ability to properly
safeguard classified Program information?
C-4 Is all travel outside the continental United States,
Hawaii, Alaska and the U.S. possessions (i.e., 6/0: 1-300e &
Puerto Rico) reported to the GSSO/CPSO thirty 1-303
days in advance?
C-5 Has the CPSO/GSSO notified the PSO before
program accessed personnel travel to any country,
6/0: 1-300c
with special emphasis on travel to countries
identified on the National Security Threat List?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 3

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
C-6 Is a written report of all changes in the personal
status of SAP indoctrinated personnel provided to 6/0: 1-300c
the PSO?
C-7 Have personnel determined to have had
unauthorized or inadvertent access to classified SAP
information:
(1) been interviewed to determine the extent of the 6/0: 1-301b
exposure, and;
(2) been requested to complete an Inadvertent
Disclosure Form (see SAP Format 5)?
C-8 Has the PSO been made aware of any reports which
6/0: 1-300 &
affect the baseline facility clearance or any incident
2-100
of a personnel security clearance nature?
C-9 Has the PSO forwarded all reportable information
to the appropriate officials (i.e. Special Access
6/0: 1-300
Program Central Adjudication Facility (SAPCAF),
CI commands/agencies, etc)?
C-10 Do SAP-accessed personnel have a valid need-to-
know and certification that he/she will materially 6/4: 1.2c
and directly contribute to the Program?
C-11 Is SAP Format 2 "Special Access Information
Agreements" signed prior to briefing an individual 6/0: 1-300b
approved for access?
C-12 Does the access data base or listing will contain the
name of the individual, position, billet number (if
6/0: 2-205
applicable), level of access, social security number,
and security clearance information?
C-13 Has every individual accessed to a SAP been given
an initial indoctrination? Are these indoctrinations 6/0: 3-101
conducted by the PSO/GSSO/CPSO or designee?
C-14 Has a formal debriefing program been developed? 6/0: 3-102a
C-15 Do formal debriefings include: (1) how to obtain a
release before publishing, (2) what can & cannot be
discussed or placed in resumes & applications for
security clearances, (3) turning in all holdings, (4)
6/0: 3-102a(1)
applicability of & penalties for engaging in
through (6)
espionage, (5) where to report suspected Foreign
Intelligence Service (FIS) contacts or any attempt
by unauthorized persons to solicit program data and,
(6) appropriate espionage laws and codes.
C-16 Has a SAPIA been executed at the time of the
debriefing and forwarded to PSO within two 6/0: 3-102
business days?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 4

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
C-17 If attempts to locate an individual either by
telephone or mail are not successful, and the
whereabouts of the individual cannot be determined
in 30 days; is the individual administratively
debriefed (i.e,, completion of a debriefing form, 6/0: 3-103
annotating the form with “INDIVIDUAL NOT
AVAILABLE- ADMINISTRATIVELY
DEBRIEFED”)? Is the appropriate database
updated to reflect this?
C-18 Are Foreign Travel briefings and debriefings
conducted for all accessed personnel prior to and
following return of travel using SAP Format 6, 6/0: 3-104
Notification of Foreign Travel, or its SCI
community equivalent form (either are acceptable)?
C-19 Do individuals processed for program access meet
the prerequisite personnel clearance and/or 6/4: 1.2c & 3.2
investigative requirements?
C-20 Does the candidate nomination package contain a
completed PAR, a copy of the nominee's PSQ (SF
86/86c or eQIP printout - current within one year) 6/4: 3.3b
and results of the Local Records Check (if legally
available)?
C-21 When the candidate's nomination package is ready
to be forwarded to the Government PSO, has the
CPSO completed the PAR, to include their
6/4: 3.3d
signature, date of signature, concurrence and a
check to ensure all pertinent attachments are
identified and included, as appropriate?
C-22 Do Letters of Compelling Need (LOCN)
accompany those access approval requests which
require a waiver? Do LOCNs describe the 6/4: 4.3.d(4)
candidate's unique skills or knowledge and the
benefit to the program?
C-23 Are those candidate nomination packages that
cannot be mitigated at the 2nd Tier level forwarded 6/4: 7.1
to the SAPCAF for action?
C-24 When an access eligibility determination is
unfavorable, has the SAPCAF issued a Letter of
6/4: 7.4
Intent (LOI)?

C-25 Has the CPSO or GSSO provided the LOI to the

candidate? 6/4: 7.4

C-26 When a candidate is unsuccessful in his/her appeal,

has the SAPCAF forwarded the candidate a Letter
of Denial (LOD) or Letter of Revocation (LOR)? 6/4: 7.5

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 5

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
D. ACCOUNTABILITY
D-1 Are TOP SECRET engineering notebooks
permanently bound documents and each page 6/0: 4-201a & d
numbered consecutively, front and back?
D-2 Are the outer covers and each page of TOP
SECRET engineering notebooks marked with the
6/0: 4-201b
highest classification and program identification(s)
contained in the notebook?
D-3 Has a Top Secret Control Official (TSCO) been
6/0: 5-201e
designated in writing?
D-4 Has an annual 100 percent inventory of
6/0: 5-202
accountable SAP classified been conducted by the
TSCO or alternate and a disinterested party?
D-5 Are these inventories conducted by sighting all
copies of accountable material held within the 6/0: 5-202
facility?
D- 6 Has all TOP SECRET SAP information been
entered into a PSO approved document control
accountability system whenever it is received, 6/0: 5-201a
generated or dispatched either internally or
externally to other SAPFs?
D- 7 Is each item of TOP SECRET SAP material
numbered in series and identified with an individual 6/0: 5-201f
copy number and total copy count?
D- 8 Do all TOP SECRET working papers have a cover
sheet marked with the date of origin, originator's 6/0: 5-203
name and the annotation “WORKING PAPER”?
D- 9 Are all TOP SECRET SAP working papers
EITHER entered into the accountability system OR 6/0: 5-203b
destroyed after 30 calendar days from the date of
origin?
E. CLASSIFICATION AND MARKING
E-1 Does each SAP have a Security Classification
Guide to identify Critical Program Information 6/0: 4-101
(CPI)?
E-2 Are challenges to SAP classified information
and/or material classifications forwarded through
6/0: 4-101
the PSO to the appropriate Original Classification
Authority (OCA)?
E-3 Has a DD Form 254, Contract Security
Classification Specification Requirements,
been prepared for each contractor performing 6/0: 4-103
work on SAPs?
E-4 Is all SAP material marked and controlled in
accordance with JAFAN 6-0, NISPOM (baseline
6/0: 4-200
marking requirements), the program SCG, and
other program guidance?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 6

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
E-5 Do cover sheets when used as a Record of
Disclosure will remain affixed to TOP SECRET
documents at all times? Does the Record of 6/0: 4-202 &
Disclosure include the identity of all persons 5-201a
given access to the information and the date of the
disclosure?
E-6 Is Unclassified HVSACO information
6/0: Appendix “A”
safeguarded IAW Appendix “A”?
F. REPRODUCTION
F-1 Is program material only reproduced on
6/0: 5-600
equipment approved by the PSO?
F-2 Have the GSSOs/CPSOs prepared written
6/0: 5-600
reproduction procedures?
F-4 Is reproduction equipment positioned to assure
6/0: 5-600
immediate and positive monitoring?
F-5 Has a notice indicating if equipment can or cannot
be used for reproduction of classified material 6/0: 5-600
been posted?
F-6 Are procedures approved in writing by the PSO
(including clearing of equipment, accessing of
operators, clearing of media, handling 6/0: 5-600
malfunctions, etc.) when reproduction equipment
is used outside a SAPF (i.e. TSWA)?
G. DESTRUCTION
G-1 Upon contract close-out, are requests for retention
of classified information submitted to the
6/0: 5-700
Contracting Officer through the PSO for review
and approval?
G-2 Has the contractor submitted a request to the
Contracting Officer through the PSO for authority
6/0: 5-701
to retain classified material beyond the end of the
contract performance period?
G-3 Is all classified waste destroyed as soon as
possible (not allowing materials to accumulate 6/0: 5-704
beyond 30 days unless approved by the PSO)?
G-4 Is classified waste residue inspected during each
destruction to ensure that classified information 6/0: 5-705
cannot be reconstructed?
G-5 Has the PSO reviewed and approved all
6/0: 5-703
destruction procedures?
G-6 Are destruction certificates completed and signed
by both of the individuals completing the
destruction immediately after destruction is 6/0: 5-706
completed?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 7

H. PHYSICAL SECURITY
H-1 Has the SAPF been formally accredited in writing
by a government PSO or designee prior to 6/9: 1.1.4
conducting any SAP activities?
H-2 Has an accreditation checklist (e.g., JAFAN 6/9,
Annex A, SAPF Fixed Facility Checklist) been 6/9: 2.2.1
completed and approved by the PSO?
H-3 Are PEDs, with the exception of the following,
prohibited within a SAPF:

(1) Electronic calculators, spell checkers,

language translators, etc.
(2) Receive-only pagers.
6/0: 5-900
(3) Audio and video playback devices.
(4) Receive only Radios.
(5) Infrared (IR) devices that convey no
intelligence data (text, audio, video, etc.), such as
an IR mouse and/or remote controls.
(6) Medical, life and safety portable devices.
H-4 Are entry/exit inspections conducted to deter the
unauthorized removal of classified material, and
6/9: 2.7
deter the introduction of prohibited items or
contraband?
H-5 Has the PSO instituted procedures for control of
electronic devices and other items introduced into 6/9: 2.8.1
or removed from the SAPF?
H-6 When conditions warrant, has a TSCM evaluation
6/9: 2.3.3
been requested (at the discretion of the PSO)?
H-7 Are combinations changed immediately
whenever:
 a combination lock is first installed
or used?
 a combination has been subjected,
or believed to have been subjected
to compromise?
6/9: 2.6.1
 whenever a individual knowing
the combination no longer requires access
to it unless other sufficient controls
exist to prevent access to the lock?
 at other times when considered necessary by
the PSO?

H-8 Has co-location/co-utilization of Sensitive

Compartmented Information within a SAPF been 6/9: 2.4.2
authorized via PSO?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 8

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
I. ACCESS CONTROL
I-1 Is a written/electronic visit notification
coordinated in advance & acknowledged/
6/0: 6-100
approved prior to visiting a SAPF (via
hardcopy/electronic transfer/database)?
I-2 Has the GPM or his/her designated representative
approved all visits between program activities?
6/0: 6-101a(1)
Has the PSO or designee certified the accesses to
the facility?
I-3 Are twelve-month visit certifications not
authorized unless approved in writing by the 6/0: 6-101b
PSO?
I-4 Are all visit requests transmitted via PSO-
approved channels (via hardcopy/electronic 6/0: 6-100
transfer/database)?
I-5 Has the PSO/GSSO/CPSO or his/her designated
representative immediately notified all recipients
6/0: 6-101g
of the cancellation or termination of visit
requests?
I-6 Is positive identification of each visitor made
using an official State or Federal-issued 6/0: 6-101d
identification card/credential with a photograph?
I-7 Are non-program accessed visitors continuously
escorted and their movements closely controlled 6/0: 6-101f
while in a SAPF?
I-8 Are advance arrangements coordinated between
the visitor, the visitor's cognizant security officer
6/0: 6-101(3)
and the destination facility's security officer
regarding the hand carrying of program material?
I-9 Has use of internal warning systems been
considered or employed along with other
additional methods (e.g., verbal announcements) 6/0: 6-101f
to warn or remind personnel of the presence of
uncleared personnel?
I-10 Are all non-program briefed personnel (e.g.,
maintenance workers, repair technicians, etc)
6/0: 6-102
required to complete the visitor's record and be
escorted by a resident program-briefed individual?
I-11 Has a separate program visitor's record been
established for program briefed visitors? Does it
show the visitor's name, last four digits of the 6/0: 6-103
individual's SSN, organization or firm, date, time
in and out, and sponsor on the log?
I-12 Are program meetings and conferences conducted
only in approved SAPFs? (Note: PSOs may
6/0: 6-200
authorize additional locations, i.e. Temporary
Secure Working Area (TSWA))

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 9

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
J. COMPUTER SECURITY
J-1: 6/3: 2.B.6.c(1)
J-1: 6/3: 9.F.2
Does a formal IA Program exist with all a: 6/3: 2.B.4.c;
required Documentation available, current 9.D.4
and complete? b: 6/3:2.B.2.b(3)
a. Certification and Accreditation b: 6/3:9.D.3.b(1)
b. Delegations of Authority c: 6/3: 9.D.2.b(2)
J-1
c. MOUs & CUAs d: 6/3:2.B.7.c(3)
d. SSP/SSAA and other procedural d: 6/3:9.C.3
documents e: 6/3: 8.B.6
e. Guest systems documentation f: 6/3: 4.B.1.b(2)
f. Audit documents f: 6/3:
4.B.2.a(4)(c)

Does a Configuration Management program

appropriate for the PL exist?
a. Is it a formally documented J-2: 6/3: 5.B.1.a(2)
a: 6/3: 2.B.7.c(7)
process?
b: 6/3:
J-2 b. Does it address all aspects of 5.B.1.a(2)(b)
hardware & software management. c: 6/3: 8.B.5.e
c. Does it address maintenance and c: 6/3: 8.B.8.c(7)
disposition of equipment

Does a formal IA Training Program exist that

addresses all users: J-3: 6/3: 8.B.1.a
a: 6/3: 2.B.5.c(9)
a. IAM/ISSM/ISSR duties
a: 6/3: 8.B.1.b
J-3 b. SysAdmin and privileged users b: 6/3: 8.B.1.c(1)
c. Regular Users c: 6/3: 8.B.1.c(2)
d. Special Requirements (DTO etc) d: 6/3: 8.B.1.b(4)

Does a media management plan exist that

addresses the following:
a. Does it address ALL media
in the facility
b. Are formal procedures for J-4: 6/0: 8-101
data extraction/data transfer approved and in a: 6/0: 8-102
b: 6/3: 8.B.3
use
c. Does the plan address c: 6/0: 8-102
J-4
d: 6/3: 8.B.5
media movement & day to day management
e: 6/3: 8.B.2.a
d. Are sanitization/disposition
procedures in place for ALL media types in
use
e. Are appropriate markings
and labeling procedures in use

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 10

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
K. TRANSMISSION
K-1 If transmission by a commercial courier is
6/0: 5-400b
anticipated, has the PSO approved its use?
K-2 Is all classified SAP material prepared,
reproduced, and packaged by program-briefed 6/0: 5-401
personnel in SAPFs?
K-3 Are receipts for the transmission of all classified
(SECRET/TOP SECRET) material used/ 6/0: 5-401a
maintained?
K-4 Is tracer action initiated when a receipt or
acknowledgment of a shipment of material is not 6/0: 5-401b(1)
returned within 30 days?
K-5 Are Two-Person courier teams used for all
handcarry of TOP SECRET/SAP data unless a
6/0: 5-402a
single-person courier is approved in advance by
the cognizant PSO?
K-6 Are problems encountered by couriers while
6/0: 5-402e
enroute will be immediately reported to the PSO?
K-7 Are Courier Authorization letters (i.e., SAP
Format 28) or card (see below) issued by the
PSO/GSSO/CPSO from the departure location
outlining the courier procedures?

(1) Does the Courier Authorization and pre-

departure instructions address the: a) method of
transportation, b) travel itinerary (intermittent/
unscheduled stops, remain-overnight scenarios,
etc), c) specific courier responsibilities
(primary/alternate roles-as necessary), and d)
completion of receipts (as necessary) and full
identification of the classified data being
transferred and e) a discussion of
emergency/contingency plans (include after-hours 6/0: 5-402c(1)
POCs, primary/alternate contact data, telephone & (2)
numbers, etc)

(2) Has each courier will acknowledge

receipt/understanding of this briefing in writing.

(3) In the case of experienced program-briefed

individuals who frequently or routinely perform
duties as classified couriers, are they issued
Courier Authorization cards by the
PSO/GSSO/CPSO in lieu of individual letters for
each trip?

(4) Are courier cards revalidated/reissued

annually?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 11

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
K-8 Is Top Secret material transmitted only by 6/0: 5-402a
authorized means (e.g., 2-person courier, secure & 5-403
electronic means)?
K-9 Is SAP information double-wrapped using opaque
6/0: 5-401c
material which precludes observation of contents?
K-10 When secure facsimile and/or electronic
transmission is permitted, has the PSO approved 6/0: 5-403
the system in writing?
K-11 When a U.S. Postal mailing channel is approved
by the PSO, is mail received only by appropriately 6/0: 5-404
cleared and accessed personnel?
K-12 Are problems, misdeliveries, losses, or other
security incidents encountered with transmission
6/0: 5-404e
of SAP information immediately reported to the
the PSO?
K-13 Before any movement of classified SAP assets are
transportation plans developed and approved by
6/0: 5-404f
the PSO at least 30 days in advance of the
proposed movement?
K-14 Are two program briefed personnel destroying
6/0: 5-702
accountable classified program material?
K-15 Are receipts maintained IAW Appendix “C” (five
6/0: Appendix “C”
year period)?
L. SECURITY EDUCATION
Have all individuals received initial and refresher 6/0: 3-100 &
L-1 training per Table 1, JAFAN 6-0, and topics Appendix “G”-SAP
covered as listed on SAP Format 17? Format 17
L-2 Have GSSOs/CPSOs ensured that the Security
Education & Training program meets specific and 6/0: 3-100
unique requirements of individual SAPs?
L-3 Has each individual reviewed their eQIP/SF86
printout on an annual basis and updated it as
necessary? (Note: annual refresher training 6/0: 3-101
sessions are a good opportunity to accomplish
this)
M. CONTRACTING
M-1 When a subcontractor does not have the requisite
facility clearance, has the prime CPSO initiated
the necessary FCL paperwork and submitted it to
6/0: 7-101
the PSO? Has the PSO coordinated with DSS to
initiate action to provide the subcontractor a
facility clearance?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 12

Code / No. Question References Yes No N/A
M-2 In the pre-contract phase, has the prime contractor
advised the prospective subcontractor (prior to
any release of SAP information) of the
procurement's enhanced special security 6/0: 7-102
requirements? Have arrangements for
subcontractor program access been pre-
coordinated with the PSO?

M-4 Has the CPSO completed a SAP Format 13,

Subcontractor/Supplier Data Sheet, and submitted 6/0: 7-102
it to the PSO?
M-5 Has the CPSO included the reason for considering
a subcontractor and attached a proposed DD Form
254 to the SAP Format 13? (Note: The DD Form
254 shall be tailored to be consistent with the 6/0: 7-102
proposed support being sought.)

M-6 Are DD Form 254s prepared by prime contractor

CPSOs and forwarded to the PSO for approval
(before signature by the prime contractor and
release to subcontractors)? Have PSOs 6/0: 7-103
coordinated these DD Form 254s with the GPM
and Government Contracting Officer (GCO)?

N. GUARD FORCE
N-1 Within the U.S. at at CLOSED storage SAPF, is a
response force capable of responding to an alarm
within 15 minutes after annunciation and a reserve 6/9: 3.1.1.1
response force available to assist the responding
force?
N-2 Within the U.S. at at OPEN storage SAPF, is a
response force capable of responding to an alarm
within 5 minutes after annunciation and a reserve 6/9: 3.1.2.1
response force available to assist the responding
force?
N-3 Are response force personnel appropriately
trained and equipped according to SOPs to 6/9: Annex B,
accomplish initial or follow-up response to para 5.2.2
situations that may threaten the SAPF’s security?
N-4 Is the IDE maintained by US citizens? (Note:
6/9: Annex B,
Non-US citizens shall not provide these services
para 5.3.1
without prior written approval by the PSO)
N-5 Is the alarm monitoring station continuously
supervised and operated by US citizens who are 6/9: Annex B,
trained alarm monitors, cleared to the SECRET para 5.1.1
level?

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 13

O. SPECIAL EMPHASIS ITEMS

JAFAN 6-0, Revision 1 14