Ieee 1222
Ieee 1222
                                                                                                                                                  STANDARDS
Performance for All-Dielectric
Self-Supporting (ADSS) Fiber Optic
Cable for Use on Electric Utility
Power Lines
Developed by the
Power System Communications and Cybersecurity Committee
     Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Developed by the
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
      2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Keywords: ADSS, all-dielectric self-supporting fiber optic cable, IEEE 1222™, overhead utility
  IEEE is a registered trademark in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, owned by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
  Incorporated.
                                                                        2
                                                Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  IEEE Standards documents (standards, recommended practices, and guides), both full-use and trial-use, are
  developed within IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinating Committees of the IEEE Standards
  Association (“IEEE SA”) Standards Board. IEEE (“the Institute”) develops its standards through a
  consensus development process, approved by the American National Standards Institute (“ANSI”), which
  brings together volunteers representing varied viewpoints and interests to achieve the final product. IEEE
  Standards are documents developed through scientific, academic, and industry-based technical working
  groups. Volunteers in IEEE working groups are not necessarily members of the Institute and participate
  without compensation from IEEE. While IEEE administers the process and establishes rules to promote
  fairness in the consensus development process, IEEE does not independently evaluate, test, or verify the
  accuracy of any of the information or the soundness of any judgments contained in its standards.
  IEEE Standards do not guarantee or ensure safety, security, health, or environmental protection, or ensure
  against interference with or from other devices or networks. Implementers and users of IEEE Standards
  documents are responsible for determining and complying with all appropriate safety, security,
  environmental, health, and interference protection practices and all applicable laws and regulations.
  IEEE does not warrant or represent the accuracy or content of the material contained in its standards, and
  expressly disclaims all warranties (express, implied and statutory) not included in this or any other
  document relating to the standard, including, but not limited to, the warranties of: merchantability; fitness
  for a particular purpose; non-infringement; and quality, accuracy, effectiveness, currency, or completeness
  of material. In addition, IEEE disclaims any and all conditions relating to: results; and workmanlike effort.
  IEEE standards documents are supplied “AS IS” and “WITH ALL FAULTS.”
  Use of an IEEE standard is wholly voluntary. The existence of an IEEE standard does not imply that there
  are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market, or provide other goods and services related
  to the scope of the IEEE standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the time a standard is approved
  and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in the state of the art and comments
  received from users of the standard.
  In publishing and making its standards available, IEEE is not suggesting or rendering professional or other
  services for, or on behalf of, any person or entity nor is IEEE undertaking to perform any duty owed by any
  other person or entity to another. Any person utilizing any IEEE Standards document, should rely upon his
  or her own independent judgment in the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances or, as
  appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional in determining the appropriateness of a given
  IEEE standard.
  IN NO EVENT SHALL IEEE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
  EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
  PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS;
  OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY,
  WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR
  OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE PUBLICATION, USE OF, OR RELIANCE
  UPON ANY STANDARD, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE AND
  REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH DAMAGE WAS FORESEEABLE.
                                                                    3
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Translations
  The IEEE consensus development process involves the review of documents in English only. In the event
  that an IEEE standard is translated, only the English version published by IEEE should be considered the
  approved IEEE standard.
Official statements
  A statement, written or oral, that is not processed in accordance with the IEEE SA Standards Board
  Operations Manual shall not be considered or inferred to be the official position of IEEE or any of its
  committees and shall not be considered to be, or be relied upon as, a formal position of IEEE. At lectures,
  symposia, seminars, or educational courses, an individual presenting information on IEEE standards shall
  make it clear that his or her views should be considered the personal views of that individual rather than the
  formal position of IEEE.
Comments on standards
  Comments for revision of IEEE Standards documents are welcome from any interested party, regardless of
  membership affiliation with IEEE. However, IEEE does not provide consulting information or advice
  pertaining to IEEE Standards documents. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a
  proposed change of text, together with appropriate supporting comments. Since IEEE standards represent a
  consensus of concerned interests, it is important that any responses to comments and questions also receive
  the concurrence of a balance of interests. For this reason, IEEE and the members of its societies and
  Standards Coordinating Committees are not able to provide an instant response to comments or questions
  except in those cases where the matter has previously been addressed. For the same reason, IEEE does not
  respond to interpretation requests. Any person who would like to participate in revisions to an IEEE
  standard is welcome to join the relevant IEEE working group.
  Users of IEEE Standards documents should consult all applicable laws and regulations. Compliance with
  the provisions of any IEEE Standards document does not imply compliance to any applicable regulatory
  requirements. Implementers of the standard are responsible for observing or referring to the applicable
  regulatory requirements. IEEE does not, by the publication of its standards, intend to urge action that is not
  in compliance with applicable laws, and these documents may not be construed as doing so.
Copyrights
  IEEE draft and approved standards are copyrighted by IEEE under US and international copyright laws.
  They are made available by IEEE and are adopted for a wide variety of both public and private uses. These
  include both use, by reference, in laws and regulations, and use in private self-regulation, standardization,
  and the promotion of engineering practices and methods. By making these documents available for use and
  adoption by public authorities and private users, IEEE does not waive any rights in copyright to the
  documents.
                                                                    4
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Photocopies
  Subject to payment of the appropriate fee, IEEE will grant users a limited, non-exclusive license to
  photocopy portions of any individual standard for company or organizational internal use or individual,
  non-commercial use only. To arrange for payment of licensing fees, please contact Copyright Clearance
  Center, Customer Service, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 USA; +1 978 750 8400. Permission
  to photocopy portions of any individual standard for educational classroom use can also be obtained
  through the Copyright Clearance Center.
  Users of IEEE Standards documents should be aware that these documents may be superseded at any time
  by the issuance of new editions or may be amended from time to time through the issuance of amendments,
  corrigenda, or errata. An official IEEE document at any point in time consists of the current edition of the
  document together with any amendments, corrigenda, or errata then in effect.
  Every IEEE standard is subjected to review at least every 10 years. When a document is more than 10 years
  old and has not undergone a revision process, it is reasonable to conclude that its contents, although still of
  some value, do not wholly reflect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to check to determine that
  they have the latest edition of any IEEE standard.
  In order to determine whether a given document is the current edition and whether it has been amended
  through the issuance of amendments, corrigenda, or errata, visit IEEE Xplore at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  or contact IEEE at the address listed previously. For more information about the IEEE SA or IEEE’s
  standards development process, visit the IEEE SA Website at http://standards.ieee.org.
Errata
  Errata, if any, for IEEE standards can be accessed via https://standards.ieee.org/standard/index.html. Search
  for standard number and year of approval to access the web page of the published standard. Errata links are
  located under the Additional Resources Details section. Errata are also available in IEEE Xplore:
  https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/browse/standards/collection/ieee/. Users are encouraged to periodically check for
  errata.
Patents
  Attention is called to the possibility that implementation of this standard may require use of subject matter
  covered by patent rights. By publication of this standard, no position is taken by the IEEE with respect to
  the existence or validity of any patent rights in connection therewith. If a patent holder or patent applicant
  has filed a statement of assurance via an Accepted Letter of Assurance, then the statement is listed on the
  IEEE SA Website at https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/patents.html. Letters of Assurance may
  indicate whether the Submitter is willing or unwilling to grant licenses under patent rights without
  compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of
  any unfair discrimination to applicants desiring to obtain such licenses.
  Essential Patent Claims may exist for which a Letter of Assurance has not been received. The IEEE is not
  responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting
  inquiries into the legal validity or scope of Patents Claims, or determining whether any licensing terms or
  conditions provided in connection with submission of a Letter of Assurance, if any, or in any licensing
  agreements are reasonable or non-discriminatory. Users of this standard are expressly advised that
  determination of the validity of any patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely
  their own responsibility. Further information may be obtained from the IEEE Standards Association.
                                                                    5
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Participants
  At the time this IEEE standard was completed, the Fiber Optics Standards Working Group had the
  following membership:
  The following members of the individual balloting committee voted on this standard. Balloters may have
  voted for approval, disapproval, or abstention.
                                                                    6
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  When the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved this standard on 7 November 2019, it had the following
  membership:
*Member Emeritus
                                                                    7
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
        2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Introduction
  This introduction is not part of IEEE Std 1222-2019, IEEE Standard for Testing and Performance for All-Dielectric
  Self-Supporting (ADSS) Fiber Optic Cable for Use on Electric Utility Power Lines.
  This standard was first published in 2004 and updated in 2011. It is used worldwide to purchase and specify
  the performance of all-dielectric self-supporting (ADSS) cables. The original purpose of the standard was
  written to fill a need for standardization of terminology, performance, and test requirements for ADSS
  cables.
  The original title was “IEEE Standard for All-Dielectric Self-Supporting Fiber Optic Cable.” Over the
  years, the document has been used primarily as a test standard. To better reflect how the standard is
  presently used, the title previously changed to “IEEE Standard for Testing and Performance for All-
  Dielectric Self-Supporting Fiber Optic (ADSS) Cable for Use on Electric Utility Power Lines.”
  This revised standard documents the collective experience gained by the industry since the updated
  publication of the standard in 2011. Changes have been made in the following areas:
             Functional requirements
             Test requirements
  Additional requirements related to ADSS Cable Hardware and Cable/Hardware Compatibility are
  addressed in IEEE Std 1591.2 [B10]. 1
  1
      The numbers in brackets correspond to those of the bibliography in Annex F.
                                                                     8
                                              Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
      2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Contents
  1. Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 10
     1.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................. 10
     1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 10
2. Normative references................................................................................................................................ 10
                                                                                 9
                                                     Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
1. Overview
1.1 Scope
  This standard covers the construction, mechanical, electrical, and optical performance, installation
  guidelines, acceptance criteria, test requirements, environmental considerations, and accessories for a
  nonmetallic, all-dielectric self-supporting (ADSS) fiber optic cable. The ADSS cable is designed to be
  located primarily on overhead utility facilities.
1.2 Purpose
  This standard provides both construction and performance requirements for maintenance of the proper
  optical fiber integrity and optical transmission capabilities of ADSS cable.
  This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport
  to address all of the safety issues associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard
  to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations
  prior to use.
  2. Normative references
  The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document (i.e., they must
  be understood and used, so each referenced document is cited in text and its relationship to this document is
  explained). For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of
  the referenced document (including any amendments or corrigenda) applies.
                                                                   10
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
      2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
ASTM D1603, Standard Test Method for Carbon Black Content in Olefin Plastics. 2
  IEC 60793-2-10, Optical fibres—Part 2-10: Product specifications—Sectional specification for category A1
  multimode fibres. 4
  IEC 60793-2-50, Optical fibres—Part 2-50: Product specifications—Sectional specification for class B single-
  mode fibres.
  IEC 60794-1-21, Optical fibre cables—Part 1-21: Generic specification—Basic optical cable test
  procedures—Mechanical tests methods.
  IEC 60794-1-22, Optical fibre cables—Part 1-22: Generic specification—Basic optical cable test
  procedures—Environmental test methods.
IEC 61395, Overhead electrical conductors—Creep test procedures for stranded conductors.
  TIA-455-3, FOTP-3 Procedures to Measure Temperature Cycling Effects on Optical Fiber Units, Optical
  Cable, and Other Passive Fiber Components. 5
TIA-455-33, FOTP-33 Optical Fiber Cable Tensile Loading and Bending Test.
  TIA-455-78, FOTP-78 IEC 60793-1-40 Optical Fibres—Part 1-40: Measurement Methods and Test
  Procedures—Attenuation.
TIA-455-81, FOTP-81 Compound Flow (Drip) Test for Filled Fiber Optic Cable.
TIA-455-82, FOTP 82-B Fluid Penetration Test for Fluid-Blocked Fiber Optic Cable.
  TIA-455-244, FOTP-244 Methods for Measuring the Change in Transmittance of Optical Fibers in
  Expressed Buffer Tubes When Subjected to Temperature Cycling.
  2
    ASTM publications are available from the American Society for Testing and Materials (https://www.astm.org/).
  3
    EIA/TIA publications are available from Global Engineering Documents (https://global.ihs.com/).
  4
    IEC publications are available from the International Electrotechnical Commission (https://www.iec.ch) and the American National
  Standards Institute (https://www.ansi.org/).
  5
    TIA publications are available from the Telecommunications Industry Association (https://www.global.ihs.com).
                                                                   11
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
      2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  breaking strength: The maximum tensile load that the cable shall withstand without mechanical failure.
  The maximum rated cable load is typically less than 60% of the breaking strength. The breaking strength
  should be calculated. The design model shall be validated; the cables do not need to be tested to their
  breaking strength. Syn: breaking tension.
  everyday tension (EDT): The final tension with no ice and no wind at the average annual mean
  temperature throughout the year. This temperature is assumed as 16 °C (60 °F). This number is often used
  in specifying motion control devices such as vibration dampers.
hardware: Attachments or fittings that are in direct contact with the cable.
  maximum installation tension (MIT): The initial tension at which the cable is pulled during the sagging
  portion of the installation process. This tension is used to achieve the appropriate installation sag defined by
  the manufacturer. Syn: sagging tension.
NOTE—This is the same as the initial everyday tension when specified at 16 °C (60 °F).7
  maximum rated cable load (MRCL): The maximum tensile load the cable is designed to withstand
  during its lifetime. This is sometimes called the maximum rated design tension by the IEEE or the
  maximum allowed tension by IEC. This is typically the load the cable is designed to take when the cable is
  installed in its maximum specified span length while experiencing the maximum specified weather load.
  stringing tension (STT): The tension used to pull the cable through sheaves during the stringing portion of
  the installation process. This should never be greater than the sagging tension. Syn: pulling tension.
system (ADSS system): The cable and hardware described in IEEE Std 1222 that function as an integrated unit.
  torque balance dielectric members: The cable strength yarns are wound in opposite directions as opposed
  to a single direction to minimize cable twisting when under tension.
  corona: A luminous discharge due to ionization of the air surrounding an electrode caused by a voltage
  gradient exceeding a certain critical value.
NOTE—For the purpose of this standard, electrodes may be conductors, hardware, accessories, or insulators.
  6
    IEEE Standards Dictionary Online is available at: http://dictionary.ieee.org. An IEEE Account is required for access to the
  dictionary, and one can be created at no charge on the dictionary sign-in page.
  7
    Notes in text, tables, and figures are given for information only and do not contain requirements needed to implement the standard.
                                                                   12
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  dry band arcing: When wet pollution on all-dielectric self-supporting cable jacket dries, high-resistance
  dry bands form. Induced voltage of sufficient magnitude across dry bands produces an arc that can
  potentially damage the jacket.
  electric field strength: The change in space potential over a change in distance. Basic concept is E ≅
  dV/ds and E is a vector that has magnitude and direction. Magnitude described in units of volts per meter
  (common abbreviations are V/m, kV/m, and kV/cm). Direction may be in the form of components such as
  Ex, Ey, and Ez or given by unit direction vectors (Ux, Uy, Uz).
  induced voltage (Voc): In IEEE Std 1222, Voc refers to the induced voltage across a formed dry band in
  the absence of an arc, often called “voltage open circuit.”
  pollution resistance: The wet pollution resistance on all-dielectric self-supporting (ADSS) jacket surface
  in ohms per meter. This parameter is used to determine currents in the wet pollution layer as well as for
  computing dry band arc voltage.
NOTE 1—These currents and voltages form the basis of the test described in Annex E.
  NOTE 2—ADSS cable wet pollution is normally very conductive compared to dry pollution. In general, 108 Ω/m or
  less is considered conductive.
  pollution index: The exponent of the wet pollution linear resistance in ohms per meter. For example, an
  index of 5.7 indicates a resistance of 105.7 or 501 kΩ/m.
  space potential: A level of voltage in space between energized as well as grounded objects (e.g.,
  conductors of a high-voltage transmission line and tower members). The magnitude is described in units of
  volts. Mathematically this is a scalar value.
  surface gradient: The electric field strength on a surface. Levels near 20 kV (rms)/cm are high enough to
  break down air resulting in corona.
                                                                   13
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
4.1 Descriptions
  The ADSS cable shall consist of coated glass optical fibers grouped in one or more protective dielectric
  units surrounded by or attached to suitable dielectric strength members and jackets. The cable shall not
  contain metallic components. The cable shall be designed to meet the requirements under all specified
  installation conditions, operating temperatures, and environmental loading.
  The fiber optic cable core shall be all-dielectric and shall contain coated glass optical fibers that are
  protected from mechanical, environmental, and electrical stresses. Materials used within the core shall be
  compatible with one another, shall not degrade under the electrical stresses to which they may be exposed,
  and shall not evolve hydrogen in quantities sufficient to degrade optical performance of fibers within the
  cable.
  The cable shall be designed such that fiber strain does not exceed the limit allowed by the cable
  manufacturer under the operational design limits (MRCL) of the cable. Maximum allowable fiber strain is
  generally a function of the proof test level, and the strength and fatigue parameters of the coated glass fiber.
  The maximum fiber strain shall not exceed the limit specified in 6.5.1.2. The optical fiber attenuation
  increase while under fiber strain shall also meet the requirements listed in 6.5.1.2.
  If a central strength element is necessary, it shall be of reinforced plastic, epoxy glass, or other dielectric
  material. If required, this element shall provide the necessary tensile strength to limit axial stress on the
  fibers and minimize fiber buckling due to cable contraction at low temperatures. The strength element shall
  also meet the stress strain fatigue requirements in 6.5.1.3.
  Loose buffer tubes shall be water-blocked with a suitable material compatible with the tubing material,
  fiber coating, and coloring, to protect the optical fibers and prevent moisture ingress.
  The design of the cable may include suitable water blocking materials in the interstices to prohibit water
  migration along the fiber optic cable core. The water blocking material shall be compatible with all
  components with which it may come in contact.
4.2.5 Binder/tape
  A binder yarn or yarns and/or a layer or layers of overlapping non-hygroscopic tape(s) may be used to hold
  the cable core elements in place during application of the jacket.
                                                                   14
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
        2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  A protective inner jacket or jackets of a suitable material may be applied over the fiber optic cable core,
  isolating the cable core from any external strength elements and the cable outer jacket.
  All single-mode fibers shall meet the requirements of IEC 60793-2-50. 8 All multimode fibers shall meet the
  requirements of IEC 60793-2-10. The core and the cladding shall consist of all glass that is predominantly
  silica (SiO2). The coating is usually made from one or more materials, such as acrylate, and shall protect
  the fiber during manufacture, handling, and operation.
  The individually coated optical fiber(s) or fiber ribbon(s) may be surrounded by a tube for protection from
  physical damage during fabrication, installation, and operation of the ADSS cable. Loose buffer
  construction is a typical type of protection that may be used to isolate the fibers. The fiber coating shall be
  strippable for splicing and termination.
  Loose buffer construction shall consist of a tube that surrounds each fiber or fiber group such that the inner
  diameter of the tube is greater than the outside diameter of the fiber or fiber group. The interstices inside
  and outside the tube shall contain a water blocking material.
  Color coding is essential for identifying individual optical fibers and groups of optical fibers. The colors
  shall be in accordance with EIA/TIA-598. The original identification of fibers and units shall remain
  discernible throughout the design life of the cable when cleaned and prepared per manufacturer’s
  recommendations.
4.6 Jackets
  The outer jacket shall be designed to house and protect the inner elements of the cable from damage due to
  moisture, sunlight, environmental, thermal, mechanical, and electrical stresses.
       a)     All jacket materials shall be dielectric, non-nutrient to fungus and meet the general requirements in
              5.4 and 6.5.4. The jacket material may be polyethylene. The outer jacket shall contain a minimum
              concentration of 2.35% furnace black (carbon black) when measured in accordance with
              ASTM D1603 to provide ultraviolet shielding. The raw jacket material shall contain an antioxidant
              to provide long-term stabilization.
       b)     The jacket shall be extruded over the underlying element and shall be of uniform diameter to
              properly fit support hardware.
       c)     The cable jacket shall be suitable for application in electrical environments as defined in 6.5.4.
  8
      Information on references can be found in Clause 2.
                                                                   15
                                               Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
        2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  ADSS cable designs are dependent on the application conditions and operating environment in which they
  are installed. Key characteristics that should be agreed upon between the supplier and customer are
  provided in Table 1 9 and Table 2.
  9
      The numbers in brackets correspond to those of the bibliography in Annex F.
                                                                    16
                                              Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
        2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  If the customer does not provide the information listed in Table 1, they shall take into consideration the
  supplier’s cable performance information/specifications to determine compatible installation conditions.
  The following are recommended as minimum sag and tension criteria when designing and installing ADSS
  cable:
        a)    The ADSS cable sag should be specified by the customer to meet ground or conductor clearances.
              The installation sag shall be specified along with any maximum sag requirements at the maximum
              weather load. ADSS performs differently from optical ground wire (OPGW) or metal conductors
              and therefore both installation and worst case environmental conditions should be considered.
        b)    The customer shall adhere to the appropriate country standards for ADSS cable sag clearances such
              as the National Electrical Safety Code® (NESC®) [B1] 10 for the United States.
        c)    ADSS cable placement and sags should be designed to provide sufficient spacing from conductors
              to prevent clashing during loaded conditions; including wind and ice load conditions.
        d)    The maximum rated cable load (MRCL) of the ADSS cable shall not be exceeded.
        e)    It is recommended that tension limits for a specific application be chosen through a coordinated
              study that should include the requirements of the user, recommendations from the cable supplier,
              and recommendations from the supplier of all supporting hardware.
  Sag and tension recommendations regarding vibration protection should be obtained from the ADSS cable
  supplier or from a vibration protection hardware supplier approved by the cable supplier.
  The cable shall be designed such that it can withstand Aeolian vibrations with either permanent or
  temporary attenuation increases less than the criteria indicated in 6.5.3.1.
  Upon receipt of the ADSS cable from the supplier, it is recommended that the purchaser visually inspect
  each reel. If physical damage to the reel or lagging is found, the cable should be inspected for damage and
  10
       The numbers in brackets correspond to those of the bibliography in Annex F.
                                                                    17
                                               Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  the manufacturer notified prior to taking acceptance of the shipment. A check should be made to verify the
  received reel quantities and lengths correspond to the ordered quantities.
  Upon receipt of the cable, it is recommended that acceptance tests be performed to verify that the optical
  characteristics of the fiber meet the order requirements and to determine if optical fibers have been
  damaged during shipment. The results of these tests and the supplier’s certified quality control information,
  which is attached to each reel, should be compared to the fiber requirements specified in the purchase
  order.
  An ADSS cable shall be able to withstand the natural elements that exist at its installation location. The
  environmental pollution level at installation routes can vary vastly from location to location. Therefore,
  some ADSS designs are more suitable for certain locations than other designs. Locations that are low-
  contamination sites do not require extreme contamination protection for problems like dry band arcing;
  whereas, high contamination sites such as salt water zones, industrial pollution zones, volcanic sulfur
  zones, or combinations of zones require special protection from dry band arcing on the ADSS.
  These areas are defined as installation locations that have low levels of contaminate materials such as salts,
  industrial pollution, volcanic pollution, naturally occurring atmospheric/animal corrosive pollutants or any
  combinations of these materials. Care shall be taken when considering ADSS that may be affected by other
  contaminates or damaging elements such as windblown sand.
  ADSS cables defined in this standard can be installed in low-pollution installation sites, provided the
  proper electrical evaluation is performed. See the acceptance criteria section of the electrical test in 6.5.4.
                                                                   18
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  High-pollution installation sites are areas defined as locations that receive high levels of pollution materials
  such as salts, industrial pollution, volcanic pollution, naturally occurring atmospheric/animal contamination
  pollutants, or any combinations of these or other materials. Care shall be taken when considering ADSS
  that may be affected by additional contamination or damaging elements such as windblown sand. If ADSS
  cable is being installed in an area that requires cleaning of the insulators or situations where higher levels of
  insulation are used than is customary due to the environment, then this is considered a high-pollution area.
  Table 7 in IEEE Std 1313.2-1999 [B8], which references Table 1 in IEC 60071-2:2018 [B4], provides
  additional guidance to assist in determining pollution levels.
  It is important that the customer notify the manufacturer of any applications with moderate- to high-
  pollution exposure.
     a)     The outer cable jacket selection should consider the pollution levels at present day and potential
            future industrial growth.
     b)     Installation of protective gear, such as animal excrement guard, may be required to minimize
            pollution damage.
  5.6 Installation
  It is recommended that the ADSS cable and hardware supplier’s procedures be used for the installation of
  an ADSS cable. Key critical items are bend radius, span length, installation tension, pulling block size and
  type, and hardware installation. Ignoring any of these parameters may result in crushed or damaged cable.
  The manufacturer’s cable specifications should be reviewed prior to installation to understand the cable’s
  performance specifications (see 5.1).
  5.7 Hardware
  The interaction of the hardware and ADSS cable shall be considered. Excessive contact pressure under
  hardware can exceed the designed crushing limits of the ADSS cable. Suspension and dead-end hardware and
  some types of vibration damper hardware for ADSS cable are usually recommended by the cable
  manufacturer. Different hardware is also required depending on angle changes at attachment points from
  elevation or route direction changes. IEEE Std 1591.2 [B10] provides the requirements for ADSS hardware.
  5.8 Packaging
  Cable reel packaging considerations are provided as follows:
     a)     ADSS cable should be tightly and uniformly wound onto the reel. Reel lengths may be either
            STANDARD LENGTHS or SPECIFIED LENGTHS. STANDARD LENGTHS are reel lengths
            that are normally provided by a supplier. This length is defined by the supplier. SPECIFIED
            LENGTHS are reel lengths that are specified by the purchaser. A tolerance of +2% and –0% shall
            be maintained for SPECIFIED LENGTHS and STANDARD LENGTHS unless specified
            differently by the customer.
     b)     Reels shall be a suitable wooden or steel type. Unless specified otherwise by the purchaser, the
            supplier determines the size and type reel that will withstand normal shipping, handling, storage,
            and stringing operations without damage to the ADSS cable.
     c)     The drum and inside flanges shall be such that damage will not occur to the ADSS cable during
            shipping, handling, storage, and stringing. The outer layer of the ADSS cable shall be protected by
            a water-resistant solar wrapping over the exposed surface to prevent excessive heat buildup from
            sun exposure. It also provides a barrier from dirt and gritty material from coming in contact with
            the ADSS cable during shipment and storage.
                                                                   19
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
     d)     Reel numbers shall be marked in a clear and legible manner on the outside of the flange.
     e)     Each reel shall have a shipping tag attached to the outside of one of the reel flanges. Tags shall be
            weather-resistant. All essential information such as supplier’s name; ADSS cable part number or
            description; number of fibers; order number; reel number; ordered and shipped lengths; and gross
            and net weight shall appear legibly on the tags. The tags should clearly indicate ADSS cable in the
            description.
     f)     The outer end of the ADSS cable shall be fastened to the inner surface of the reel flange a
            minimum of 25 mm below the flange edge. The cable end shall be securely fastened to prevent the
            cable from becoming loose during shipment. A minimum of 2 m of the inner end of the ADSS
            cable shall be accessible for connection to optical measuring equipment. This length of cable shall
            be securely fastened and protected during shipment.
     g)     A seal shall be applied to each end of the ADSS cable to prevent the entrance of moisture or the
            escape of filling compound during shipment and storage.
     h)     The supplier shall furnish, at the time of shipment, a certified record of final quality control
            measured attenuation values for each fiber on each reel. This certification shall be attached to the
            reel in a weatherproof package.
     i)     Each reel shall be marked on the outside flange to indicate the direction the reel should be rolled
            during shipment in order to prevent loosening of the cable on the reel.
  The following criteria should be considered when locating ADSS cable in a high-voltage environment, such
  as on transmission lines.
  Electric fields and pollution may override each other. That is, if one parameter is satisfactory and the other
  not, then the unsatisfactory parameter becomes the limiting factor.
  While related to electric fields, corona is a localized phenomenon and can be mitigated with appropriate
  hardware.
  Electric fields can affect the outer jacket of ADSS. While there are no established electric field limits,
  designers should locate ADSS on high-voltage structures (and equipment) where the lowest electric field
  strength can be determined. More information is provided in Annex B.
  Corona damages all types of ADSS jacket material. Acids created by interaction of corona and atmospheric
  components can completely erode the jacket permitting moisture to permeate the inner strength material
  (e.g., aramid yarn). The result is internal corona (sometimes called partial discharge) that degrades the
  strength resulting in failure. A typical source of corona is on tips of armor rods of dead-end and suspension
  hardware. Corona mitigating devices should be used to reduce surface electric fields on hardware,
  especially the armor rod tips, to levels significantly less than 20 kV/cm.
  A suggested level is 10 kV/cm or less. In general, ADSS applications on lines operated at 230 kV and
  higher require corona suppression devices.
                                                                   20
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Similar to the electric field analysis described in Annex B, 3D electric field analysis is required to
  determine surface electric fields (also known as surface gradients) on the tips of the armor rods or on any
  hardware in close proximity of the ADSS jacket surface. This (as well as testing) may have already been
  done for corona devices available from cable and hardware manufacturers. For more information, see
  Annex C.
  Accumulation of pollution on the jacket can lead to “dry band arcing” when wet cables begin to dry.
  Pollution and moisture together become conductive. Capacitive coupling to adjacent energized conductors
  produces currents in the pollution layer. The resulting induced voltage across dry bands can be high enough
  to create arcs. Arc currents can contain enough energy (heat) to damage the jacket. The user should acquire
  knowledge of the potential pollutants in a service area. Mitigation involves location on the structure in
  areas of low electric field strength as well as selecting Class B jacket material in lieu of Class A. Dry band
  arcing requirements are covered in 6.5.4.
  The customer shall notify the supplier of the pollution environment. The supplier shall then determine its
  product compliance against dry band arcing.
  Annex D provides a method to quantify the pollution level; a test method to determine dry band arc
  resistance at different pollution levels is provided in Annex E.
                                                                   21
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  The parameters specified in this standard may be affected by measurement uncertainty arising from
  measurement error or calibration error from the lack of suitable standards. Acceptance criteria shall
  consider this uncertainty. For the purpose of this standard, the total uncertainty shall be considered to be
  <0.05 dB for attenuation or <0.05 dB/km for attenuation coefficient. Any measurement within this range is
  considered “no change” in attenuation.
  Optical fiber performance can generally be performed by one of the following two methods:
           Monitor individual fibers for attenuation change: This method can determine the maximum change
            of any individual fiber tested. When the change for all individual tested fibers is averaged, the
            “average change” for all fibers can be determined. The minimum number of fibers to be monitored
            is provided in 6.2.2.
           Loop-back measurements: This method splices the fibers under test to each other so that they are
            concatenated or loop-backed with each other in a continuous length. The attenuation change is
            determined by dividing the attenuation change across all loop-back fibers under test by the number
            of loop-backed fibers. This provides an attenuation change per fiber. This result is actually the
            average attenuation change across all the loop-back fibers. The number of fibers to be monitored is
            provided in 6.2.2.
  For tests that do not specify loop-back testing (i.e., crush, low/high temperature bend, twist, cyclic flex,
  impact, and mid-span buffer tube storage), the maximum attenuation change criteria shall be determined by
  monitoring individual fibers.
  NOTE—Loop-back testing may determine compliance to a maximum specification if the “total end-to-end loop-back
  attenuation change” is less than the “maximum individual attenuation fiber specification”; however, if “total end-end-
  loop-back” measurement is greater than the “maximum individual fiber” specification, it cannot be used to determine a
  failure to the specification.
  For example:
           If the specified maximum individual fiber criteria is equal to 0.10 dB and the average is equal to
            0.05 dB.
           Measured end-end attenuation across 10 loop-backed fibers = 0.15 dB = 0.015 dB/fiber. This
            complies with the 0.05 dB average specification.
           Because 0.15 dB exceeds 0.10 dB maximum individual fiber specification, it cannot be determined
            if this complies with the maximum individual fiber specification. If the end-end attenuation loop-
            back fiber measurement was 0.09 dB, this could be used to show compliance.
  When individual fiber monitoring is performed to determine conformance to the “maximum change”
  criteria, the average criteria is determined by averaging the individual fiber readings.
  When specified by a test method, cable manufacturers shall determine compliance to both of the following:
           Maximum change from individual fibers that are individually monitored. This requires individual
            fibers be monitored during testing.
           Average change across all monitored fibers. The manufacturer is allowed to test by using either of
            the following two test methods: monitoring individual fibers or monitoring loop-back fibers.
  Independent third-party test laboratories may monitor fibers individually or may monitor fibers using the loop-
  back method. If the loop-back method is used, only the “average” criteria shall be used if it specified. For tests
  that do not specify an “average” criterion, the maximum criteria shall be used and compared to the measured per-
  fiber value. Any number of fibers may be tested as long as they meet the minimum number specified in 6.2.2.
                                                                   22
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  When testing multimode fiber, it is acceptable to monitor only 1300 nm because it is the more sensitive
  wavelength.
  When measuring with a power meter, a laser source with the appropriate wavelength is injected to an
  optical splitter. The splitter divides the source signal into at least two signals. During the test, the optical
  measuring system (source, splitter, and receiver) shall maintain a certain level of stability in accordance
  with the test. One of the split signals is sent directly to an optical power meter and serves as the reference
  signal. The other split signal is used to measure the test fibers. When individual fibers are monitored, it is
  acceptable to use a switching system. During the tests, the readings from both optical power meters are
  monitored periodically in a suitable manner for future analysis. Any changes in the difference between the
  reference and test signals indicate a change in the attenuation in the test fiber. A net increase in attenuation
  means a loss in the optical signal. A net decrease in attenuation indicates a gain in the signal.
  For product qualification type testing, the number of fibers measured in a test shall be the greatest of 10%
  of the number of fibers in a cable or 10 fibers; however, the number of fibers to be tested is not required to
  exceed 30 unless agreed upon between manufacturer and customer. For fiber counts less than 10, all fibers
  shall be tested.
The following criteria shall be applied when considering the placement of fibers to be tested:
     a)     Cable type
            1)    Stranded tube designs: For single layer cables, a minimum of two active units should be
                  positioned diametrically opposite each other. For two-layer cables, four units (two in each
                  layer) should be positioned at 90° intervals within a cable. For multi-layer cables, similar
                  reasoning for unit positioning may apply.
            2)    Ribbon designs: The active units should be located in the first, last, and middle positions. At a
                  minimum, active fibers shall be positioned in the edge positions within these ribbons. For
                  cables with multi-stacks, units should be selected from stacks diametrically opposite each
                  other. Partially bonded ribbons should use the criteria in item a1) for stranded tube designs.
     b)     Core units (i.e., tubes) shall contain a full complement of fibers, however dummy fibers may be
            allowed. The working fibers shall be disbursed in the working units. Filler rods may be allowed in
            place of buffer tubes. The manufacturer shall position the working units within a cable so that these
            units are subjected to the full force of the testing stresses. The manufacturer shall demonstrate
            theoretically or through testing that the positioning of the test fibers is representative of the
            performance of all the fibers within the cable.
  A minimum of one cable per design family shall be tested for initial qualification/type testing. A design
  family varies with different sheath constructions or sheath material (e.g., single jacket PE, dual jacket PE,
  or dual jacket track resistant jacket). Single- and dual-layer cores shall be considered different design
  families. Tubes with different materials or tube sizes are also considered different design families. A design
  with different fiber counts and MRCL tensile ratings are considered the same design family if the highest
  MRCL and largest and lowest fiber count core construction are tested.
  Once a design is qualified, if changes to the cable design or materials are made that affect the function of
  the cable, only the tests that are affected by the change need to be performed.
                                                                   23
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
6.3 Retesting
  In the event of a failure of any customer requested tests, the ADSS cable design and the test setup and
  procedures shall be reviewed by the purchaser, supplier, and test laboratory.
  If an anomaly is found during lot acceptance testing, a retest on a different cable shall be allowed. If an
  anomaly is found during individual cable tests, it may be repeated if mutually agreed among these parties.
  The manufacturer and customer shall agree upon the maximum individual fiber attenuation coefficient in a
  cable. The manufacturer shall measure 100% of the fibers on each master production reel for compliance to
  the specified attenuation coefficient. Attenuation values exceeding the specified criteria shall constitute a
  failure. Single mode shall be specified at 1310 nm, 1550 nm, and/or 1625 nm as agreed upon with the user;
  multimode shall be specified at 850 nm and/or 1300 nm.
Point discontinuities when measured in accordance with TIA-455-78 (FOTP-78) shall not exceed 0.1 dB.
  Classification
  Cable characteristic/mechanical/conditional
  Intent
  The intent of the creep test is to determine the long-term creep properties of the ADSS cable. This
  information is used in the sag-tension calculations during the design layout of a fiber optic cable system.
  Objective
           To produce the long-term, room temperature tensile creep curve and equation for the ADSS cable.
  NOTE—The optical performance of the ADSS cable is not required to be monitored during this test unless specified by
  the cable purchaser.
  Setup
  The test shall be set up in accordance with IEC 61395 or IEC 60794-1-21-2015 Method 32 unless
  otherwise specified by the cable purchaser and where noted in this standard.
  When testing to IEC 61395, the ADSS cable sample shall be terminated such that all the load-carrying
  components of the cable are prevented from moving relative to each other at the loading points. A
  suggested method is to use epoxy-resin grips to encapsulate all components of the cable at the loading
  points. The length of the cable between the loading points of the dead-end assemblies shall be a minimum
  of 10 m. The cable shall be preloaded to a maximum of 2% of the cable MRCL (logic: to be consistent with
                                                                   24
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  the 50% of MRCL in the procedure). The cable shall not remain at the preload value for more than 5 min.
  A suitable gauge shall be used to measure the longitudinal cable elongation over a gauge length of at least
  8 m. A suitable gauge such as a load cell or dynamometer shall be used to measure the tension in the cable.
  The cable temperature shall be measured at both ends of the gauge section. The test shall be carried out in a
  temperature-controlled environment at 23 °C ± 5 °C.
  Procedure
  The test shall be performed in accordance with IEC 61395 or IEC 60794-1-21-2015 Method 32 unless
  otherwise specified by the cable purchaser or noted in this standard.
  Acceptance criteria
  Unless otherwise specified by the cable purchaser, there are no acceptance criteria for this test.
  Classification
  Cable characteristic/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the tensile test is to determine the tensile performance of the cable. This includes understanding
  the cable attenuation and fiber strain at the maximum installation tension (MIT) (also known as the maximum
  sagging tension) and the MRCL. This test also provides an understanding of the cable performance from
  repeated cyclic tensile loads. The final modulus of elasticity of the ADSS cable can also be determined. This
  information is used in the sag-tension calculations during the design layout of a fiber optic cable system.
  Objective
           To verify the optical performance at MIT and MRCL
           To verify that the fiber strain at the MIT load is less than 0.05%
           To verify that the fiber strain at the MRCL is less than 20% of the fiber proof test level
  Setup
  The test shall be set up in accordance with TIA-455-33 (FOTP-33) with the following exceptions. The use
  of sheaves is not mandatory. A sample of cable shall be placed in a tensile testing apparatus such that a
  minimum of 10 m of cable within the middle of the test length can be subjected to the tensile loading. If the
  test setup is not capable of testing 100 m of cable, the fiber under test shall be loop-back spliced to achieve
  a minimum of 100 m of fiber length in the test. The ADSS cable sample shall be terminated such that all
  the load-carrying components of the cable are prevented from moving relative to each other at the loading
  points. A suggested method is to use epoxy resin grips to encapsulate all components of the cable.
                                                                   25
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  The tensile test shall first be used to obtain a stress/strain curve. Load the cable to the MIT and record the
  below information. Then increase the load to the MRCL, hold for 4 h and record the following:
           The load and strain on the cable
           The maximum fiber attenuation increase in decibels
           The maximum fiber strain
  A cyclic loading test shall be performed subsequent to the initial tensile test to gauge the cable’s dynamic
  performance. Cycle the cable from MIT to MRCL for 50 cycles at approximately one to three cycles per
  minute. Take measurements at the high and low loading extremes for the first two cycles and last two
  cycles. Record the following:
           The load and strain on the cable
           The maximum fiber attenuation increase in decibels
           The maximum fiber strain
The MRCL and the maximum fiber strain shall be specified by the manufacturer and verified through this test.
The cable strain (elongation) measured during this test shall be used in 6.5.1.3.
  Classification
  Raw material characteristic/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the stress strain test is to verify that the cable strength components are reliable under repeated
  stress/strain cycles experienced in the cable at loads up to MRCL.
  Objective
  To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable strength components when subjected to repeated
  exposure to the MRCL load.
  Setup
  This test shall be performed on each of the material types used as a strength element in ADSS cable (e.g., each
  GRP size and vendor, each yarn denier and vendor). The strength material shall be placed in a mechanical tester.
  As an option, the test can be performed on a cable; however, the cable components shall be properly secured.
  Test procedure
  Cycle the strength component (e.g., central strength member, aramid yarn) 500 times from the elongation
  the cable experiences from the MIT (also known as the maximum sagging tension) to the elongation the
  cable experiences at MRCL. The cable elongation at MIT and MRCL can be obtained from cable
  measurements during the tensile test.
                                                                   26
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Acceptance criteria
  Any cracks or breaks of the cable strength elements shall constitute failure.
  Classification
  Installation/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the sheave test is to subject the ADSS cable to a simulated action of being pulled over a
  number of sheaves during stringing of the cable in installation. During installation, the ADSS could become
  excessively deformed. The optical unit(s) could also be damaged and the optic fibers adversely affected.
  Objective
    To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified installation
         stringing tension conditions
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified installation
            stringing tension conditions
  Setup
  The general arrangement for the sheave test is shown in Figure 1.
  A sheave test shall be performed on a sample cable a minimum of 9 m long. Dead-end fittings shall be
  clamped a minimum of 3 m apart. The optical fibers shall be connected to each other by means of loop-
  back splicing using fusion or other equally reliable splices. The test length of optical fiber shall be a
  minimum of 100 m long. A light source shall be connected to one end of the test fiber. At the other end, an
  optical power meter shall be used to monitor the relative light power level.
                                                                   27
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Depending on the size of the line angle, various diameter stringing sheaves are recommended by the ADSS
  cable manufacturer. Therefore, this test shall be performed using various sheave diameters corresponding to
  the line angle being tested as listed below. The cable shall be pulled at one dead-end at the maximum
  stringing tension (STT) specified by the ADSS cable manufacturer. The method of attachment, while not
  rigid, shall limit the amount of twist that could occur at the lead end. A dynamometer and a swivel shall be
  installed between the yoke and the other dead-end.
  Test procedure
  A 2 m minimum length of the ADSS test sample shall be pulled 120 times forward and backward through
  the sheave (60 times in each direction).
  The diameter of the sheave for the angle of pull is determined by the ADSS cable manufacturer. Before the
  first pull, the beginning, midpoint and end of this length shall be marked. After the test is completed, the
  ADSS cable shall be removed in the test section and the cable shall be visually examined for any surface
  damage. The ADSS cable shall be dissected to observe for any signs of damage to the inner structure.
  Acceptance criteria
           Any cracks or breaks of any of the cable components shall constitute failure. This assessment is
            made with the naked eye.
           Attenuation increases across the loop-backed spliced fibers shall be normalized to
            decibels/kilometer; this provides an average increase across all the loop-back spliced fibers. Any
            permanent increase in optical attenuation exceeding a value of 1.0 dB/km at 1550 nm for single
            mode and 1300 nm for multimode shall constitute failure.
  Classification
  Installation/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the crush test is to subject the ADSS cable to crushing or clamping forces that could occur
  during installation, operation, or maintenance. The cable could be crushed to the extent of adversely
  affecting the optical signals.
  Objective
           To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable and the supporting hardware when subjected
            to crush forces
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable when subjected to crush forces
  Setup
  The crush test shall be carried out on a sample of cable according to the method provided by TIA-455-41
  (FOTP-41).
  Acceptance criteria
  The maximum attenuation increase during load or after release of load shall not exceed 0.1 dB at 1550 nm
  for any single-mode fiber under test.
                                                                   28
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Classification
  Installation/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the bend test is to subject the ADSS cable to a bending action similar to that which might be
  experienced during the specified installation temperature extremes. The cable and/or the optical unit(s)
  could be damaged and the optic performance could be adversely affected.
  Classification
  Installation/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the twist test is to subject the ADSS cable to a simulated action of being pulled over a number of
  sheaves during installation (i.e., stringing and sagging). During installation, the ADSS cable could become
  twisted. The optical unit(s) could be damaged and the optic performance could be adversely affected.
  Objective
           To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified installation
            conditions
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified installation
            conditions
  Setup
  The cable twist test shall be conducted in accordance with TIA-455-85 (FOTP-85). The cable length
  subjected to the test shall be a maximum of 4 m. The test shall be repeated for 10 cycles.
  Acceptance criteria
  The cable shall not exhibit evidence of damage. The maximum attenuation increase shall not exceed 0.10 dB
  at 1550 nm for any single-mode fiber under test; the average increase of all fibers under test shall not exceed
  0.05 dB per fiber. The maximum attenuation increase for multimode fiber shall be 0.4 dB at 1300 nm.
  Classification
  Installation/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the cyclic flex test is to subject the ADSS cable to a simulated action of being pulled over a
  number of sheaves during installation (i.e., stringing and sagging).
  Objective
           To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable during installation
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable after installation
  Setup
  The cable flex test shall be conducted in accordance with TIA-455-104 (FOTP-104). The sheave diameter
  shall be less than or equal to 20 times the cable outside diameter or the cable manufacturer’s stated static
  bend diameter. The cable shall be flexed for 25 cycles at 30 ± 1 cycles/min.
                                                                   29
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Acceptance criteria
  The cable shall not exhibit evidence of damage. The maximum attenuation increase shall not exceed 0.10 dB
  at 1550 nm for any single-mode fiber under test; the average increase of all fibers under test shall not exceed
  0.05 dB per fiber. The maximum attenuation increase for multimode fiber shall be 0.4 dB at 1300 nm.
  Classification
  Installation/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the cable impact test is to subject the ADSS cable to impacts perpendicular to its surface that
  could be experienced during installation.
  Objective
    To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable
  Setup
  The cable impact test shall be conducted in accordance with TIA-455-25 (FOTP-25).
  Acceptance criteria
  The cable shall not exhibit evidence of damage. The maximum attenuation increase shall not exceed 0.10 dB
  at 1550 nm for any single-mode fiber under test; the average increase of all fibers under test shall not exceed
  0.05 dB per fiber. The maximum attenuation increase for multimode fiber shall be 0.4 dB at 1300 nm.
  Classification
  Cable characteristic/environmental/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the compound seepage test is to determine if the water blocking material in the ADSS cable is
  vulnerable to flowing under high temperatures. This test is only applicable for those cable designs that
  utilize a gel-based water blocking compound. The negative impact of the flooding compound seeping is
  that the compound could accumulate inside a splice box or building.
  Objective
  To subject the ADSS cable to an elevated temperature that may cause the water blocking compound to drip
  or otherwise leak from the optical fiber unit. The optical performance of the ADSS cable is not monitored
  during this test.
  Setup
  The cable shall be tested in accordance with TIA-455-81 (FOTP-81), with preconditioning of specimens
  permitted. Testing shall be conducted at 65 °C for 24 h. The cable samples prepared end may be terminated
  according to the manufacturer’s recommended installation instructions. The upper (unprepared) end of the
  cable or buffer tube may be sealed to simulate long length cable sections.
  Acceptance criteria
  The amount of drip shall not exceed 0.05 g.
                                                                   30
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  Classification
  In-Service/mechanical/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the Aeolian vibration test is to subject the ADSS cable and support hardware to damped
  Aeolian vibrations. This type of cable vibration is caused by laminar wind as it passes over bare cable and
  is a common occurrence in the field. Fatigue damage can occur on the cable components or hardware at
  attachment locations. The optical signals may also be adversely affected by Aeolian vibration.
  Objective
           To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable and the supporting hardware when subjected
            to simulated vibration conditions
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified vibration
            conditions
  Setup
  The general arrangement to be used for the Aeolian vibration tests and the support details are shown in Figure 2.
  The end abutments are used to load and maintain tension in the fiber optic cable. The test section is
  contained between the two intermediate abutments. End and intermediate abutments need not be separate
  units if the combined unit affords sufficient space for the apparatus specified below. The fiber optic cable
  to be tested should be cut a sufficient length beyond the intermediate abutments to allow removal of the
  cable coverings and to allow access to the optical fibers. Suitable dead-end assemblies or end abutments are
  installed on the fiber optic cable to fit between the intermediate abutments. The test sample shall be
  terminated at both ends prior to tensioning in a manner such that the optical fibers cannot move relative to
  the cable. A dynamometer, load cell, calibrated beam, or other device should be used to measure cable
  tension. Some means should be provided to maintain constant tension to allow for temperature fluctuations
  during the testing. The cable should be tensioned to 100% of the rated maximum installation tension.
  In order to achieve repeatability of test results, the active span should be approximately 20 m or more, with
  a suitable suspension assembly located approximately two-thirds of the distance between the two dead-end
  assemblies. Longer active and/or back spans may be used. See Figure 2. The vibration amplitude in the
  back-span shall be significantly less than the activity of the front span (e.g., less than 5%). The suspension
                                                                   31
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  assembly shall be supported at a height such that the static sag angle of the cable to horizontal is
  1-3/4 degrees ± 3/4 degree in the active span.
  Means shall be provided for measuring and monitoring the mid-loop (anti-node) vibration amplitude at a
  free loop, not a support loop.
  An electronically-controlled shaker shall be used to excite the cable in the vertical plane. The shaker
  armature shall be securely fastened to the cable so that it is perpendicular to the cable in the vertical plane.
  The shaker should be located in the span to allow for a minimum of six vibration loops between the
  suspension assembly and the shaker.
  The test length (i.e., between dead-end assemblies) of the optical fiber shall be a minimum of 100 m. To
  achieve this length, several fibers may be spliced together. At least one fiber shall be tested from each
  buffer tube or fiber bundle. Splices should be made so the optical equipment can be located at the same
  end. Optical measurements shall be made using a light source with a nominal wavelength of 1550 nm for
  single-mode fibers and a nominal wavelength of 1300 nm for multimode fibers.
  The source shall be split into two signals. One signal shall be connected to an optical power meter and shall
  act as a reference. The other signal shall be connected to a free end of the test fiber. The returning signal
  shall be connected to a second optical power meter. All optical connections and splices shall remain intact
  through the entire test duration.
  An initial optical measurement shall be taken when the span is pre-tensioned to approximately 10% of MIT
  prior to final tensioning to MIT. The difference between the two signals for the initial measurement
  provides a reference level. The change in this difference during the test indicates the change in attenuation
  of the test fiber. The signals may be output on a strip chart recorder for a continuous hardcopy record.
  Procedure
  The cable shall be subjected to a minimum of 1 000 000 vibration cycles. The frequency of the test span
  shall be equal to and maintained at the nearest resonant frequency produced by a 16.1 km/h wind (i.e.,
  frequency = 82.92 / diameter of cable in centimeters). The free-loop peak-to-peak anti-node amplitude shall
  be maintained at a level equal to one-half the diameter of the cable.
  In the initial stages, the test span requires continuous attention and recordings shall be taken approximately
  every 15 min until the test span has stabilized. After the span has stabilized, readings shall be taken a
  minimum of two times per day, typically at the start and end of the working day.
  A final optical measurement shall be taken at least 2 h after the completion of the vibration test. After
  completion of the Aeolian vibration test, a section of the cable from the location of the hardware support
  shall be loaded to the MRCL.
  Acceptance criteria
           Any cracking or breaking of any component of the ADSS cable or the supporting hardware shall
            constitute failure. This assessment is made with the naked eye.
           A permanent or temporary increase in optical attenuation greater than 0.2 dB/km at 1550 nm for
            single-mode fiber and 1300 nm for multimode shall constitute failure.
  Classification
  In-service/mechanical/conditional
  Intent
  The intent of the galloping test is to subject the ADSS cable and support hardware to galloping motions.
  This type of cable motion is typically caused by wind on a cable with ice accretion. Fatigue or other
                                                                   32
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  damage can occur on the components of the cable, hardware, and/or to the structure. The optical signals
  may also be adversely affected by cable galloping.
  Objective
    To verify the mechanical integrity of the ADSS cable and the supporting hardware when subjected
         to simulated galloping conditions
           To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified galloping
            conditions
  Setup
  The general arrangement to be used for the galloping test is shown in Figure 3.
  The overall span between dead-end assemblies should be a minimum of 35 m. The end abutments are used
  to load and maintain tension in the fiber optic cable. The test section is contained between the two
  intermediate abutments. End and intermediate abutments need not be separate units if the combined unit
  affords sufficient space for the apparatus specified below. The fiber optic cable to be tested should be a
  sufficient length beyond the intermediate abutments to allow removal of the cable outer coverings and to
  allow access to the optical fibers. The test sample shall be terminated at both ends prior to tensioning in a
  manner such that the optical fibers cannot move relative to the cable. A dynamometer, load cell, calibrated
  beam, or other device should be used to measure cable tension. Some means should be provided to
  maintain constant tension to allow for temperature fluctuations during the testing. However, some tension
  fluctuations are expected from the galloping activity itself. The cable should be tensioned to a minimum of
  50% of the MIT (also called maximum sagging tension) or a maximum of 500 kg. (For some cable designs,
  the test tension may need to be lowered to 250 kg in order to induce galloping. For these designs, the
  250 kg test tension is acceptable.)
  A suitable suspension assembly shall be located approximately midway between the two dead-end assemblies.
  It shall be supported at a height such that the static sag angle of the cable to horizontal shall not exceed 1°.
  Means shall be provided for measuring and monitoring the mid-loop (anti-node), single-loop galloping
  amplitude.
  A suitable shaker shall be used to excite the cable in the vertical plane. The shaker armature shall be
  securely fastened to the cable in the vertical plane.
  The test length (i.e., between dead-end assemblies) of the optical fiber shall be a minimum of 100 m. To
  achieve this length, several fibers may be spliced together. At least one fiber shall be tested from each buffer
  tube or fiber bundle. Splices should be made so the optical equipment can be located at the same end. Optical
                                                                   33
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  measurements shall be made using a light source with a nominal wavelength of 1550 nm for single-mode
  fibers and a nominal wavelength of 1300 nm for multimode fibers. The source shall be split into two signals.
  One signal shall be connected to an optical power meter and shall act as a reference. The other signal shall be
  connected to a free end of the test fiber. The returning signal shall be connected to a second optical power
  meter. All optical connections and splices shall remain intact through the entire test duration.
  An initial optical measurement shall be taken when the span is pre-tensioned to approximately 5% of MIT
  prior to final tensioning to MIT. The difference between the two signals for the initial measurement provides a
  reference level. The change in this difference during the test shall indicate the change in attenuation of the test
  fiber. The signals may be output on a strip chart recorder for a continuous hardcopy record.
  Test procedure
  The cable shall be subjected to a minimum of 100 000 galloping cycles. The test frequency shall be the
  single loop resonant frequency. The minimum peak-to-peak anti-node amplitude/loop length ratio shall be
  maintained at a value of 1/25, as measured in the active span.
Mechanical and optical data shall be read and recorded approximately every 2000 cycles.
  The optical power meters shall be monitored beginning at least 1 h before the test and ending at least 2 h
  after the test.
  The final optical measurement shall be taken at least 2 h after the completion of the vibration test. A section
  of cable from the location of the hardware support shall be loaded to the MRCL.
  Acceptance criteria
           Any cracking or breaking of any component of the ADSS cable or the supporting hardware shall
            constitute failure. This assessment is made with the naked eye.
           A permanent or temporary increase in optical attenuation greater than 0.2 dB/km at 1550 nm for
            single-mode fibers and 1300 nm for multimode shall constitute failure.
  Classification
  In-service/environmental/mandatory
  Intent
  The intent of the water ingress test is to determine if the water blocking material in the ADSS cable core is
  sufficient and uniformly distributed to inhibit water from migrating through the cable core. Water ingress
  into the optical unit can degrade the optical fibers.
  Objective
           To expose a length of water blocked structure to a head of water to verify that water does not pass
            through the cable core
           The optical performance of the ADSS cable is not monitored during this test
  Setup
  The water ingress test for ADSS cable core shall be in accordance with TIA-455-82 (FOTP-82) (e.g., 1 m
  of water head) except a maximum sample length of 3 m shall be used. Test with distilled water. Sodium
  fluorescein dyes may be added at the option of the testing laboratory. The test period shall be 24 h. Retest
  per TIA-455-82 (FOTP-82), as required. An orifice with an opening of 1.50 mm + 0.25 mm may be
  positioned at the end of the water feed tube just ahead of the open cable end. The orifice length shall not
  exceed 30 mm.
                                                                   34
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  As an alternative to the using an orifice for cables using water swellable materials, the cable may be tested
  in accordance to the test method taken from IEC 60794-1-22:2017, F5C. The end of the cable specimen to
  be connected to the water source may be presoaked in water to a depth of 100 mm + 10 mm for 10 min.
  Acceptance criteria
  No water shall leak through the open end of the cable core. If the first sample fails, one additional sample,
  taken from a section of ADSS cable immediately adjacent to the first sample, may be tested for acceptance.
  Classification
  In-service/environmental/mandatory for distribution applications, conditional for transmission applications
  Intent
  Cables that are entered at a mid-sheath location to access fibers in one or more buffer tubes are likely to
  have buffer tubes express routed (not opened) in closures. This test evaluates the optical performance of the
  fibers in the express tubes at the environmental extremes.
  Objective
  To verify the optical performance of express routed buffer tubes at a mid-sheath entry.
  Setup
  The test shall be set up according to the requirements of TIA-455-244 (FOTP-244) using the generic
  termination assembly. The mid-span express tube storage length shall be 4.3 m (14 ft).
  Procedure
  The cable sample shall be tested in accordance with TIA-455-244 (FOTP-244) using the generic termination
  assembly. Step 3 (23C) of TIA-455-3-2009 (FOTP-3) is not required except during the last cycle. Two cycles
  shall be performed. The temperature extremes to be used for the test are –40 °C and +70 °C.
  Acceptance criteria
  During the last cycle at the temperature extremes, the maximum attenuation increase for any individual
  fiber under test shall not exceed 0.1 dB at 1550 nm; the average attenuation increase across all measured
  fibers shall not exceed 0.05 dB per fiber. At the final room temperature measurement, the maximum
  increase shall not exceed 0.05 dB at 1550 nm.
  Classification
  Storage/in-service/environmental, mandatory
  Intent
  To subject the ADSS cable to extreme operating temperatures as may be experienced in the field by the
  cable.
  Objective
  To verify the optical performance of the ADSS cable when subjected to the specified extreme operating
  temperature conditions.
  Setup
  At least 500 m of cable shall be taken from a representative sample of cable. That cable shall be wound
  onto a reel and placed in an environmental chamber. The number of fibers as defined in 6.2.2 shall be
  monitored for optical attenuation and attenuation change. This requires that each individual fiber be
  monitored for attenuation change using either an OTDR or power meter. The fibers can be monitored
  individually or they may be loop-back spliced and monitored together as one continuous length. If they are
                                                                   35
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  loop-back spliced, the maximum attenuation change for each individual fiber within the loop-backed fibers
  under test shall be evaluated with an OTDR for conformance to the acceptance criteria; the attenuation
  change across all the loop-backed fibers cannot be used to determine compliance to the maximum
  acceptance criteria since it yields and average attenuation change across all fibers, not a change for each
  fiber. The change in attenuation is measured with respect to the baseline room temperature attenuation.
  Fiber loop-back splice testing is not permitted.
  Testing shall be conducted at the operating temperature extremes of –40 °C and +70 °C. If more extreme
  temperatures are specified, they shall be used.
  Procedure
  The cable sample shall be tested in accordance with TIA-455-3-2009 (FOTP-3), test condition B-1 (two
  cycles of cold – hot). The manufacturer shall assess the minimum soak time for the cable to be tested per
  TIA-455-3-2009 (FOTP-3) for use with all temperature cycling steps. Step 3 (23C) of TIA-455-3-2009
  (FOTP-3) is not required during the first cycle.
  Acceptance criteria
  During the last temperature cycle at each of the temperature extremes, a maximum increase in optical
  attenuation greater than 0.15 dB/km at 1550 nm for any individual single-mode fiber or average increase
  greater than 0.10 dB/km across all fibers shall constitute failure. The maximum increase for multimode
  fiber shall be 0.4 dB/km at 1300 nm.
  Classification
  Cable characteristic/electrical/conditional
  Intent
  The intent of the electrical test is to verify that the ADSS cable jacket material conforms to a minimum
  performance level regarding dry band arc resistance. This level is related to the expected wet pollution
  layer resistance (tracking resistance) in the particular service area where the cable is to be installed.
  Objective
           To create “artificial” dry band arc levels related in characteristic to arcs induced on polluted ADSS
            cable
           Determine ability of material under test to withstand an arc level
  Setup
  The setup shall conform to the procedure contained in Annex E. This procedure is taken from the IEEE article
  by Karady et al. [B11]. The basic theory, circuits, and operation related to this test is located in Annex D.
  Procedure
  The procedure is described in detail in Annex E. This procedure provides a test setup and methodology for
  establishing a characteristic performance curve for ADSS cable jacket material. This curve relates PI
  (pollution index) to Voc (dry band non-arcing voltage).
  Acceptance criteria
  The customer shall notify the supplier of the pollution environment, cable proximity to each power
  conductor and ground, and the voltage and phase for each conductor. The supplier shall determine the Voc
  the cable is exposed to and shall determine its product’s dry band arcing compliance for the customer
  specified application and pollution environment/index criteria. Refer to Annex D for discussion relating
  Voc to space potential.
  The corresponding dry band arc voltage at the specified pollution index when subjected to 300 cycles shall
  not erode through the jacket.
                                                                   36
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Annex A
(informative)
  Prior to this revision, ADSS cable has been rated and installed according to space potential, typically
  calculated at “mid-span” (or some distance from a supporting structure). The commonly employed
  electrical model is classical in that ADSS cable and conductors are assumed parallel and infinitely long.
  While straightforward to use and easily adapted to spreadsheets, the model falls short of fitting the real
  world for the following various reasons:
     a)     Although a useful indicator, space potential does not directly determine electrical activity.
     b)     The model is inherently two dimensional (2D). Non-parallel physical arrangements are either
            difficult or impossible to analyze for ADSS cable suitability.
     c)     Potential corona problems cannot be assessed (the model does not compute surface gradients).
     d)     Effects of pollution cannot be quantified (the model does not compute the relevant parameters).
     e)     There is no test that can determine suitability of ADSS cable jacket material directly according to
            space potential.
This revision accounts for item a) to item e), briefly and in general, as follows:
           Item a). Electric field: the directional derivative of space potential (i.e., E ≅ dV/ds) is a more direct
            indicator of activity. For pollution considerations, Voc (induced dry band voltage) is the indicator.
           Item b). The three dimensional (3D) electric field levels from known viable parallel ADSS cable
            and conductor arrangements can be applied to non-parallel arrangements.
           Item c). Corona prediction and mitigation also require 3D electric field analysis. Surface electric
            field (also known as surface gradient) is the parameter of interest. While it is generally understood
            that corona depends on the radial (normal) component of the electric field, it is important to explain
            the difference between to “surface electric field” and “surface gradient” that produces corona, and
            the one that produced Voc, as suggested.
           Item d) and item e). Research at Arizona State University in cooperation with the Bonneville Power
            Administration has resulted in the quantification of ADSS cable pollution, as well as a test, based
            on real-world models of high-voltage towers. The test involves applying Voc and pollution levels
            of various magnitudes to the ADSS cable jacket surface.
  The descriptions herein, which reflect the concerns in item a) to item e), are not intended to be a detailed
  installation guide. Development or procurement of relevant spreadsheets and programs to perform
  calculations is the responsibility of the manufacturers and/or clients.
  The writers of this document however felt the following additional explanations are needed to assist the
  reader in understanding the basic principles supporting the revisions:
           Item a). Space potential and electric fields are compared in Annex B.
           Item b). Corona on ADSS cable hardware is described in Annex C.
           Item c), item d), and item e). An overview of the pollution model and Voc test is in Annex D.
  It is cautioned that the detailed theoretical principals are more complicated and the explanations in Annex B
  through Annex E are simplified.
                                                                   37
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Annex B
(informative)
  Electric fields can affect the outer jacket of ADSS. While there are no established electric field limits, designers
  should locate ADSS on high-voltage structures (and equipment) where the lowest field levels can be determined.
B.1 Minimizing electric fields using space potential calculations (parallel case)
  On high-voltage towers, where ADSS and conductors are reasonably parallel, space potential levels can
  identify areas of minimum electric fields for a particular structure design. The customer shall provide the
  location position of the ADSS cable with respect to each conductor along with the conductors’ voltage and
  phase; this allows the space potential at the ADSS location to be calculated.
  Space potential is a level of voltage in space between energized objects (e.g., conductors of a high-voltage
  transmission line) and non-energized objects. Magnitude of space potential is described in units of volts
  and is mathematically a scalar.
B.1.1 Example of ADSS passing through space potential near a typical high-voltage structure
                                                                   38
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  B.1.2 Example of ADSS cable in electric fields (parallel case) near a typical high-voltage
  structure
  Electric field strength is the change in space potential over a change in distance. Basic concept is E ≅ dV/ds and
  E is a vector that has magnitude and direction. The magnitude of electric field strength is described in units of
  volts per meter (common abbreviations are V/m, kV/m, and kV/cm). Direction of electric field strength may be
  in the form of components such as Ex, Ey, and Ez or given by unit direction vectors (Ux, Uy, Uz).
  Where conductors and ADSS are not parallel (e.g., ADSS at right angles to conductors at a tower), the
  designer has to employ three-dimensional electric field modeling techniques to determine electric field
  levels. Because there are no established levels, the following steps are suggested:
                                                                   39
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
     a)     Select a location on a representative structure where the ADSS and conductor would be parallel and
            satisfying customer/supplier ADSS maximum electrical requirements. Using 3D methods, compute
            the electric fields on the ADSS near the supporting metallic hardware. Diagrams in this annex show
            an approximate area and characteristic of the electric field.
     b)     Compare the electric fields of the parallel case (from B.1) to the non-parallel case. If the maximum
            electric field level of the non-parallel case is equal to or less than the maximum of the parallel case,
            then the location is acceptable. If greater, then another location must be found, or hardware added
            to reduce the maximum.
  As described above, the parallel case establishes a “de facto” standard for maximum electric field for each
  user. Future research is needed to determine a universal value.
  B.2.1 Example of ADSS cable in electric fields near a typical high-voltage structure for a
  non-parallel case
                                                                   40
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  B.2.2 Example structure designs that may require non-parallel (3D Electric Field) analysis
  for location of ADSS cable dead-ends and suspensions
     Figure B.4—Example structure designs that may require non-parallel (3D Electric Field)
                analysis for location of ADSS cable dead-ends and suspensions
                                                                   41
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Annex C
(informative)
Corona
  In the example in Figure C.1, one armor rod of the modeled group is extended about 20 mm (3/4 in). This
  is a suggested arrangement to determine a “worst-case scenario” for surface gradient. Corona usually
  occurs near 20 kV/cm.
NOTE—The roughness of the tip can reduce the corona occurrence level to below 14 kV/cm.
  It is recommended that the hardware be relocated or suppression devices be employed to reduce rod tip
  surface gradients to 10 kV/cm or less.
                   Figure C.1— Computer model of armor rods with one rod extended
                                for “worst case” corona determination
                                                                   42
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Annex D
(informative)
  The electrical environment of polluted ADSS cable suspended between high-voltage towers can be
  modeled with distributed resistance and capacitance as shown in Figure D.1. Classical equations provide
  values for the capacitances between the ADSS cable and conductor and ADSS cable and ground. Solving
  repetitive loop equations provides the pollution currents I0, I1, I2, etc., and voltages V1, V2, V3, etc.
  NOTE—Comparison of models has shown that while reasonable results are obtainable by dividing a span into
  100 sections, much better values are provided by 1000 sections.
                                        Figure D.1—Distributed element model
  Allowing the first lumped resistor (connecting V1 to the grounded tower) to be very large (e.g., 1014 Ω) and
  repeating the computation provides the value Voc, which is the voltage across a dry band in the wet
  pollution near the tower. I0, from the previous computation, becomes the arc current when the band flashes
  over.
                                                                   43
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  The entire model can be reduced to an electrical equivalent by dividing Voc by I0. A and B are the phase
  angles of each quantity. Figure D.3 shows the basic circuit for the arcing test.
  A study of a wide variety of high-voltage tower designs has shown that Req and Ceq are remarkably
  consistent for a given pollution index (PI). The PI that describes the pollution severity is the exponent of
  the measured wet pollution resistance in ohms/meter. For example, an index of 5.7 indicates a resistance of
  105.7 or 501 kΩ/m. Designs in the study ranged from single circuit low voltage (i.e., 115 kV) to double
  circuit 500 kV lines. Some examples from Karady et al. [B11] are shown in Table D.1.
                                                                   44
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
  This enables real world ADSS cable pollution dry band voltages on long spans to be duplicated in the
  laboratory in a conveniently small arrangement.
  For illustration, Figure D.4 is reprinted from Karady et al. [B11]. Note the similarity to the previous
  described equivalent circuit. R and C are Req and Ceq as described previously.
  Basically, a short sample of ADSS cable is subjected to salt spray and allowed to dry. The nature of the
  resulting arc is a duplicate of that in the real world by virtue electrical equivalency.
  As noted in the article by Karady et al. [B11], if no jacket failures were noted after 300 salt spray/dry
  cycles, the test was terminated for that PI and Voc category. The 300 cycle results become the basis for
  locating ADSS cable in the high-voltage environment without the longevity of the ADSS cable being
  affected significantly by pollution.
  Based on the arc withstand characteristics for polyethylene when tested in accordance to the test described
  in Annex E, the following performance has been observed for Class A cables (see Table D.2). It is the
  responsibility of the manufacturer to determine its cable performance.
Class A Performance
                                                                   45
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Class B Performance
  At this time, Dry Band Arc characteristics have not been established for Class B cables. Materials for Class
  B jackets are considered proprietary by cable manufacturers. Use of any data developed according to the
  arcing test described in this annex is at the discretion of the particular manufacturer.
  Computation of space potential has historically taken place at the mid-span location of ADSS cable. The
  commonly used equations assume all conductors as well as ADSS cable to be infinitely long and parallel.
  Excel spreadsheets now exist throughout the industry which can easily perform the calculations.
     a)     On the subject structure, compute electric fields for an ADSS cable located parallel to the
            conductors according to the particular cable jacket pollution/Voc test characteristics.
     b)     The electric fields of the non-parallel case should be equal to or less than the parallel case.
  Until actual measurements can be obtained and recorded, it is strongly suggested that the customer attempt
  to assess the local area. Obviously, pristine mountain areas fall into Light or better. Areas near salt water
  can display a large range depending on local climate; PI measurements close to the Pacific Ocean (Bandon,
  Oregon) range from 7.7 to 8.1. In contrast, in other parts of the world (Europe) salt can accumulate in the
  Heavy region (PI = 5) or possibly worse. Industrial and farming locations may tend toward Medium and
  Heavy. Insulator maintenance practices might provide some indication. A utility having to perform
  insulator washing should be considered in Heavy category.
  An excellent source of data is ADSS cable already installed in the same or a similar area. Details of the
  Washington State University instrument may be found in the article by Edwards et al. [B3], titled “Portable
  ADSS Surface Contamination Meter Calibrated in High Voltage Environment” .
                                                                   46
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Annex E
(informative)
  The objective of this test method is to demonstrate the resistance of the cable sheath to erosion and tracking
  under different arc voltages and degrees of pollution resistance. This test method uses a Thevenin-equivalent
  circuit shown in Figure E.1 to represent the net effect of the distributed capacitance coupling of energized
  conductors on a long span of polluted ADSS cable, Voc is the “open circuit” voltage across a dry band of wet
  pollution in the absence of arc current (see Annex D). Contamination levels are represented by the R & C in
  the circuit. More details of this test method can be found in the IEEE paper by Karady et al. [B11].
  Test setup
  An 46 cm (18 in) long cable sample shall be prepared in accordance to the diagrams in Figure E.2. The cable
  ends are to be sealed. The foil (kitchen or industrial aluminum foil is recommended, but any metallic electrode
  of similar dimension is suitable) shall be cut into two trapezoid shapes per the below diagram and wrapped
  around the cable. The foil shall be separated by 100 mm (4 in) and shall be placed near the center of the
  sample.
  An autotransformer X1 controls the primary voltage of the high-voltage transformer X2. Other supply designs
  are permissible provided the output voltage supplied to the limiting impedance is variable up to 40 kV.
  The limiting impedance is denoted by resistor R in series with capacitor C. This impedance is defined as the ratio
  of the open circuit voltage of a dry band arc (i.e., arc current extinguished) to the short circuit current of the arc
  (current in pollution layer just prior to the arc formation). The 50 Ω resistor serves as an ac milliampere meter.
                                                                   47
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Multiple samples are permitted provided each sample has a dedicated RC network connected to Voc.
  A flow diagram of the pollution delivery system is shown in Figure E.3. Salt water is mixed in a plastic
  tank or bucket that serves as a storage tank. The pump drives the water through the control valve, filter,
  flow meter and the rain nozzle. After spraying, it is collected in a stainless steel storage tank and flows back
  to the reservoir. The flow rate and water salinity are kept constant during the test
  Salinity: 1% (Wait 12 h after adding salt to allow the salt to completely dissolve). Check the salinity every
  24 h to assure a salinity of 1% or greater.
  Test method
  The appropriate Req, Ceq, and Voc are chosen. Req and Ceq are chosen to represent the pollution level.
  Voc should be chosen with care. See Annex E relating Voc to space potential.
                    Table E.1—Req and Ceq values for different pollution index values
      Pollution index              Ohms/meter                   Category                    Req                         Ceq
             5                       100 000                     Heavy                  4.2 × 106 Ω                    650 pf
            5.3                      200 000                     Heavy                  5.8 × 106 Ω                    457 pf
            5.7                      500 000                     Heavy                  9.2 × 106 Ω                    290 pf
             6                      1 000 000                   Medium                  13.1 × 106 Ω                   200 pf
            6.3                     2 000 000                   Medium                  18.6 × 106 Ω                   145 pf
            6.7                     5 000 000                   Medium                  30.0 × 106 Ω                   90 pf
             7                      10 000 000                   Light                  42.0 × 106 Ω                   65 pf
  The ADSS cable sample is subjected to repeated cycles of salt spray and drying. The samples are wetted for
  2 min and allowed to dry for 13 min. During the drying period, arcing appears on the sample. The test is
  performed under normal room temperatures and humidity.
  Dry band arcing shall not erode through the cable jacket prior to completing 300 cycles for the appropriate
  pollution index for the region. Unless a PI for the region can be determined, the customer may need to
  specify a low pollution index. The supplier’s cable shall be capable of completing 300 cycles at less than or
  equal to the customer’s specified PI.
                                                                   48
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
     2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
Annex F
(informative)
Bibliography
  Bibliographical references are resources that provide additional or helpful material but do not need to be
  understood or used to implement this standard. Reference to these resources is made for informational use only.
[B1] Accredited Standards Committee C2-2007, National Electrical Safety Code®, (NESC®). 11, 12, 13
  11
     National Electrical Safety Code and NESC are both registered trademarks and service marks of the Institute of Electrical and
  Electronics Engineers, Inc.
  12
     The NESC is available from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (https://standards.ieee.org/).
  13
     The NESC can provide appropriate standards for cable deployment including recommended weather loads.
  14
     CSA publications are available from the Canadian Standards Association (https://www.csa.ca/).
  15
     IEC publications are available from the International Electrotechnical Commission (https://www.iec.ch) and the American National
  Standards Institute (https://www.ansi.org/).
  16
     IEEE publications are available from The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (https://standards.ieee.org/).
  17
      The IEEE standards or products referred to in Annex F are trademarks owned by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics
  Engineers, Incorporated.
  18
     This standard can be used when placing cables in an electric supply location.
                                                                   49
                                             Copyright © 2020 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
          2021-04-29; Villalobos Puelles, Marco Antonio; SENERGY PE, SE GP T SP SYS LA PE PM
RAISING THE
WORLD’S
STANDARDS
Connect with us on:
    Twitter: twitter.com/ieeesa
    Facebook: facebook.com/ieeesa
    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/groups/1791118
    Beyond Standards blog: beyondstandards.ieee.org
    YouTube: youtube.com/ieeesa
standards.ieee.org
Phone: +1 732 981 0060
Authorized licensed use limited to: Siemens AG CT IP IR. Downloaded on April 22,2020 at 11:18:16 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.