Master of Arts in Nursing
USE OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR) AND QUALITY OF CARE
AMONG CRITICAL CARE NURSES IN PRINCE MOHAMMED
BIN ABDULAZIZ HOSPITAL
Submitted By:
AL-SAUDI A. LAKIBUL
MAN-DL, AY 2021-2022
Wesleyan University Cabanatuan City, Philippines
Thesis Writing
Dr. Wilfred C. Ramos
Advised
APRIL 2022
Chapter 1
Introduction
Rationale
Electronic health record (EHR) is now widely used in most of the hospitals around the
globe. As part of digitalization our health care system also adapted EHR. It gives us a tool which
can be used to help us cope with the complexity and efficiency which is often required in many
areas of work. This has put a great change specially in hospital critical care areas. Nurses
traditionally spent more time in attending patients’ needs bedside and using paper patient chart in
documentation and reviewing patient’s medical records. digital version of a patient’s paper chart
can affect the quality of patient care that a nurse gives.
EHRs are patient-centered, real-time records that make information available to authorized
users promptly and securely. While an EHR system does contain a patient's medical and
treatment history, it is designed to go beyond traditional clinical data collected in a provider's
office and can encompass a broader view of a patient's care. EHRs are important pieces of health
IT because they may store a patient's medical history, diagnoses, prescriptions, treatment plans,
immunization dates, allergies, radiological pictures, and lab and test results. It gives providers
access to evidence-based tools for making decisions about a patient's care. This can also help to
automate and streamline the workflow of providers (healthit,2019).
The EHR system has been progressively being adopted on a global scale in both developed
and developing countries due to its potential to provide healthcare services universally to its
inhabitants. Currently 58% of WHO member states have an e-health strategy. Likewise, it is
presumed that in the long term, accelerated innovations in the field of e-health will transform the
workflow in the field of healthcare. Also, the adoption of e-health technology can promote health
services, health surveillance, health-related literature and education in an easy and accessible
way.
In addition to helping the advancement of technologies, the EHR system promotes a change
in perspectives and attitudes towards people and strengthens the commitment to creating global
networks to improve local, regional and global health services. According to the Global
Observatory Health Survey, EHR technology tools are useful for most of the developed
countries. In fact, >70% of the countries are successfully using e-health services and developed
countries continue to invest in e-health systems and technologies to improve their quality of
healthcare.
There is an inadequate study about nurse’s satisfaction on the use of EHR and the the qualityof
care given in critical care areas in hospitals. The objective of this study is to assess the level of
satisfaction on the use of EHR in terms of functionality, software interfaces, overall ease and
flexibility. This study will also assess the quality of care given by the nurses to their critical
patient and correlate it with the level of EHR use satisfaction.
Literature Review
This section presents the review of related literature and studies that are all directed to the
accomplishments of the aims and purposes of this study. These literature and research works are
present to serve as bases in the interpretation of the data to be gathered. These studies either
support or refute the finding of some studies.
Electronic Health Record (EHR)
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a digital representation of a patient's medical history
that is maintained over time by the provider and may include all of the key administrative
clinical evidence relevant to that person's care under that provider, such as demographic trends,
clinical documentation, issues, medications, vital signs, medical histories, vaccinations,
laboratory results, and radiology reports. The electronic health record (EHR) streamlines the
clinician's workflow by automating access to information. Other care-related activities, such as
evidence-based decision support, quality monitoring, and outcomes reporting, can be supported
directly or indirectly by the EHR through various interfaces. EHRs are the next phase in
healthcare's evolution, and they have the potential to improve patient-clinician relationships.
Providers will be able to make better judgments and deliver better care as a result of the data, as
well as its timeliness and availability. By improving the quality and clarity of medical records,
the EHR can improve patient care by lowering the occurrence of medical errors. Making health
information more accessible, minimizing errors of investigations, lowering treatment delays, and
ensuring that patients are well-informed to make better decisions are all priorities. Improving the
quality and clarity of medical records to reduce medical errors, Medicare & Medicaid (2021)
Importance of EHR
EHRs can help with patient care in a variety of ways. They can help with diagnosis by
allowing clinicians access to all of a patient's health information, which gives practitioners a
more complete picture and allows them to diagnose problems faster. Furthermore, EHRs can aid
in the reduction of medical errors, the increase of patient safety, and the promoting of quality
results. While electronic health records (EHRs) store and transmit data, they also alter patient
data in a better way and offer that information to caregivers at the point of care. EHRs can also
help enhance health outcomes for patients by allowing providers to see the health information of
the entire patient population, recognize particular risk factors and improve outcomes. Every EHR
system comes with a set of standard and critical features. For starters, EHR platforms frequently
include a patient portal where patients may access information, as well as secure data sharing and
access from other healthcare companies. Patient care orders, such as medicine requests and
diagnostic test orders, are generally placed in EHRs for clinicians. EHRs can track medication
doses for specific patients and alert doctors to any potential drug interactions. Order sets,
outcomes, and patient consents and approval can all be managed by the systems. Furthermore,
electronic health record systems usually aid in the monitoring and scheduling of clinician
workflow. Finally, these programs aid in the completion of clinical, financial, and administrative
coding. This feature offers assistance with service requests and refund claims., healthit (2021).
Electronic Health Record (EHR) to keep track of their patients’ care, including their medical
and treatment histories. EHR systems give authorized medical professionals such as clinics and
their staff a broader view of patient overall health and wellness. Additionally, patient information
indicated on a patient’s EHR is transferable from one clinic to the next. Through EMR systems,
you would no longer need as many chart pulls as before. EMR systems in the Philippines
improve the coding of visits, and they are also an excellent way for you to give your patients
reminders. EMR systems house patients’ medical history, diagnoses, medication and treatment
plans, allergies, immunization dates, laboratory test results, and more. With an EMR software
from the Philippines at your aid, you have access to evidence-based tools and guidelines to
demonstrate high-quality healthcare. Automate and streamline your workflow for the best office
experience and customer satisfaction through EMR in the Philippines, LinkedIN(2021).
There is a study by Hewner et al. (2018) stated that efforts to improve care transitions
require coordination across the healthcare continuum and interventions that enhance
communication between acute and community settings. To improve post-discharge utilization
value using technology to identify high-risk individuals who might benefit from rapid nurse
outreach to assess social and behavioral determinants of health with the goal of reducing
inpatient and emergency department visits. The project employed a before and after comparison
of the intervention site with similar primary care practice sites using population-level Medicaid
claims data. The intervention targeted discharged persons with preexisting chronic disease and
delivered a care transition alert to a nurse care coordinator for immediate telephonic outreach.
The nurse assessed social determinants of health and incorporated problems into the EHR to
share across settings. The project evaluated health outcomes and the value of nursing care on
existing electronic claims data to compare utilization in the years before and during the
intervention using negative binomial regression to account for rare events such as inpatient visits.
Avoiding readmissions and emergency visits, and increasing timely outpatient visits improved
the individual's experience of care and the work life of healthcare providers, while reducing per
capita costs (Quadruple Aim). In the intervention practice, the nurse care coordinator
demonstrated the value of nursing care by reducing inpatient (25%) and emergency (35%) visits,
and increasing outpatient visits (27%). The estimated value of avoided encounters over the
secular Medicaid trend was $664 per adult with chronic disease, generating $71,289 in revenue
from additional outpatient visits.
There is a national focus on the adoption and use of electronic health records (EHRs) with
electronic prescribing (e-Rx) for the goal of providing safe and quality care. Although there is a
large body of literature on the benefits of adoption, there is also increasing evidence of the
unintentional consequences resulting from use. As little is known about how use of EHR with e-
Rx systems affects the roles and responsibilities of nurses, the purpose of this qualitative case
study was to describe how nurses adapt to using an EHR with e-Rx system in a rural ambulatory
care practice. Six themes emerged from the data. Findings revealed that nurses adjust their
routine in response to providers' preferential behavior about EHR with e-Rx systems yet retained
focus on the patient and care coordination. Although perceived as more efficient, EHR with e-Rx
adoption increased workload and introduced safety risks, Abbott et al. (2018).
The study conducted by Feder et al., (2018), revealed that as electronic health records
(EHRs) become more common, nurse scientists are becoming more interested in using EHR data
in a range of research methodologies. Nevertheless, when EHR data is used for nonclinical
purposes, methodological issues with data quality may occur. As a result, this article discusses
typical data quality fields and methods to quality assessment in EHR research. Data quality,
completeness, reliability, authenticity, and timeliness are all common data quality domains. Data
analysis with data rules, assessment and validations of data abstraction methods with statistical
studies, data correlations with manual chart review, management of missing data with statistical
methods, and discussion of the data between multiple EHR databases are some of the approaches
for quality appraisal. Quality data improve the validity and reliability of research outcomes,
serve as the foundation for data-driven findings, and are thus an important part of EHR-based
study concept and implementation.
Changes in the patient record from the paper to the electronic health record format present
challenges and opportunities for the nurse researcher. Current use of data from the electronic
health record is in a state of flux. Novel data analytic techniques and massive data sets provide
new opportunities for nursing science. Realization of a strong electronic data output future relies
on meeting challenges of system use and operability, data presentation, and privacy. Nurse
researchers need to rethink aspects of proposal development. Joining ongoing national efforts
aimed at creating usable data output is encouraged as a means to affect system design. Working
to address challenges and embrace opportunities will help grow the science in a way that answers
important patient care questions, Samuels et al.(2015).
Challenges on use of HER
According to study conducted by Richesson et al. (2014), the major challenges for the use of
EHR-derived data for research include the lack of standard methods for ensuring that data
quality, completeness, and provenance are sufficient to assess the appropriateness of its use for
research. Areas that need continued emphasis include methods for integrating data from
heterogeneous sources, guidelines (including explicit phenotype definitions) for using these data in both
pragmatic clinical trials and observational investigations, strong data governance to better understand and
control quality of enterprise data, and promotion of national standards for representing and using clinical
data.The use of EHR data has become a priority in CRI. Awareness of underlying clinical data collection
processes will be essential in order to leverage these data for clinical research and patient care, and will
require multi-disciplinary teams representing clinical research, informatics, and healthcare operations.
Considerations for the use of EHR data provide a starting point for practical applications and a CRI
research agenda, which will be facilitated by CRI's key role in the infrastructure of a learning healthcare
system.
Electronic health records (EHRs) documentation and navigation is a necessary, but difficult,
job. At a tertiary eye hospital in Saudi Arabia, we discuss the magnitude, sources, and measures
provided by nurses to alleviate EHR-related stress (EHR-S). Methods: In 2019, nurses from an
eye hospital were polled regarding EHR-S. A Likert scale was utilized to evaluate the answers to
ten different aspects of EHR-related tasks. The total score was graded as follows: minimum (<-
10), mild (<0 to -10), moderate (1-10), and severe (>11). Determinants were linked to the score.
Nurses' stress-reduction suggestions were examined over. Results: This survey covered 212
nurses. Of them, 106 (50%; 95% confidence interval: 43.3-56.7) reported EHR-S. The median
EHR-S score was -3.0 (interquartile range: -9.0; +8.0). Thirty-five (16%) nurses reported severe
EHR-S. Senior nurses (M-W, p < 0.02) and those working in emergency and recovery units (M-
W, p < 0.01) had statistically higher EHR-S. The main stressors were incomplete EHR work by
other departments affecting nursing care (70.8%), difficulty in correction after entering the data
(60.4%), and difficulty in data retrieval (60.4%). The main solutions to reduce EHR-S were to
reduce the frequency of changes to configuration of the EHR (58%), more training (54.2%), and
appreciation of good work (52.8%). Conclusions: EHR-S affects 50% of the nurses who work in
an eye care facility. Nurses' stress levels could be reduced by implementing solutions such as
greater training and fewer modifications to the EHR system., AlQahtani et al. (2021).
Rutten et al. (2020) studied the prevalence of inadequate symptom control among cancer
patients is quite high despite the availability of definitive care guidelines and accurate and
efficient assessment tools. They conduct a hybrid type 2 stepped wedge pragmatic cluster
randomized clinical trial to evaluate a guideline-informed enhanced, electronic health record
(EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) care model. Teams of clinicians at five
hospitals that care for patients with various cancers will be randomly assigned in steps to the
E2C2 intervention. The E2C2 intervention will have two levels of care: level 1 will offer low-
touch, automated self-management support for patients reporting moderate sleep disturbance,
pain, anxiety, depression, and energy deficit symptoms or limitations in physical function (or
both). Level 2 will offer nurse-managed collaborative care for patients reporting more intense
(severe) symptoms or functional limitations (or both). By surveying and interviewing clinical
staff, we will also evaluate whether the use of a multifaceted, evidence-based implementation
strategy to support adoption and use of the E2C2 technologies improves patient and clinical
outcomes. Finally, we will conduct a mixed methods evaluation to identify disparities in the
adoption and implementation of the E2C2 intervention among elderly and rural-dwelling patients
with cancer. The E2C2 intervention offers a pragmatic, scalable approach to delivering
guideline-based symptom and function management for cancer patients. Since discrete EHR-
imbedded algorithms drive defining aspects of the intervention, the approach can be efficiently
disseminated and updated by specifying and modifying these centralized EHR algorithms.
Theoretical Framework
This study was grounded to the theory of Sister Callista L. Roy, The Adaptation Model of
Nursing (1976).
Sister Callista Roy designed the Adaptation Model of Nursing in 1976. After working with
Dorothy E. Johnson, Roy became convinced of the importance of describing the nature of
nursing as a service to society. This prompted her to begin developing her model with the goal of
nursing being to promote adaptation. She first began organizing her theory of nursing as she
developed course curriculum for nursing students at Mount St. Mary’s College. She introduced
her ideas as a basis for an integrated nursing curriculum.
Roy explained that adaptation occurs when people respond positively to environmental changes,
and it is the process and outcome of individuals and groups who use conscious awareness, self-
reflection, and choice to create human and environmental integration.
The key concepts of Roy’s Adaptation Model are made up of four components: person,
health, environment, and nursing. According to Roy’s model, a person is a bio-psycho-social
being in constant interaction with a changing environment. He or she uses innate and acquired
mechanisms to adapt. Individuals, as well as groups such as families, organizations, and
communities, are included in the model. This includes the entire society.
The Adaptation Model states that health is an inevitable dimension of a person’s life, and is
represented by a health-illness continuum. Health is also described as a state and process of
being and becoming integrated and whole. The environment has three components: focal, which
is internal or external and immediately confronts the person; contextual, which is all stimuli
present in the situation that all contribute to the effect of the focal stimulus; and residual, whose
effects in the current situation are unclear. All conditions, circumstances, and influences
surrounding and affecting the development and behavior of people and groups with particular
consideration of mutuality of person and earth resources, including focal, contextual, and
residual stimuli.
The model includes two subsystems, as well. The cognator subsystem is a major coping
process involving four cognitive-emotive channels: perceptual and information processing,
learning, judgment, and emotion. The regulator subsystem is a basic type of adaptive process that
responds automatically through neural, chemical, and endocrine coping channels, Nursing
Theory.(2020).
This theory will be applied to this study as electronic health record in a new technology in
health care. Nurses are able to adapt different changes. The way of giving quality patient care
should be there despite of new challenges that health care providers like nurses are facing.
Conceptual Framework
The diagram below shows the relationship between the independent variable and dependent
variable. The independent variables are the socio-demographic profile of the respondents and the
use of EHR Satisfaction. The dependent variables is the quality of patient care of the
respondents. The relationship of the independent and dependent variables will also be studied.
Figure 1: Schematic Diagram of Conceptual framework
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to know the use electronic health record and quality of care among critical
care nurses. Specifically, this study will seek to answers the following questions:
1.How may the socio-demographic profile of the respondents be described in terms of:
1.1 Age;
1.2 Sex;
1.3 Years of service;
1.4 Monthly Income;
1.5 Area of assignment
2.What is the level of EHR use satisfaction of the respondents in terms of:
2.1functionality;
2.2. software interfaces;
2.3overall ease and flexibility?
3.What is the level of quality of the care that the respondents give to their patients?
4.Is there a significant relationship between socio-demographic profile and the level of quality of
the care that the respondents give to their patients?
5.Is there a significant relationship between the level of EHR use satisfaction and the level of
quality of the care that the respondents give to their patients?
Null Hypothesis:
To draw inferences from the study, the following hypothesis were tested at 0.05 level of
significance.
1. There is a no significant relationship between socio-demographic profile and quality patient
care of the respondents.
2. There is a no significant relationship between the level of EHR use satisfaction and quality
patient care of the respondents?
Definition of Terms
To show better comprehension of the study, the following key terms are defined
operationally, how they words are used in the study.
Critical Care Nurses In this study it refers to nurses assigned in Intensive Care Unit (neonatal,
pediatric and adult, ICU stepdown), Cardiac Care Unit, Labor and Deliver, Hemodialysis Unit,
Emergency Room and Operating Room. Nurses assigned in ward and outpatient department
don’t belong to critical care nurses.
EHR Satisfaction This refers to the state of contentment of the nurses in the use of EHR during
their work.
Electronic Health Record In this study it refers to the electronic system used in critical area
specifically in terms of its functionality, software interfaces and overall ease and flexibility.
Quality of care This refers to the kind of care that the nurses in critical care render to their
patient. This will be based on the own perception of the nurses not on the rating of the patient.
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The researcher will employ descriptive-correlation design in describing, analyzing, and
interpreting data of EHR satisfaction and quality of patient care. The term “descriptive statistics”
refers to the analysis, summary, and presentation of findings related to a data set derived from a
sample or entire population (Corporate Finance Institute, 2021). Descriptive statistics is the term
given to the analysis of data that helps describe, show or summarize data in a meaningful way
such that, for example, patterns might emerge from the data. Descriptive statistics allow a
researcher to portray data in a more comprehensible way, allowing for easier interrogation. As a
result, descriptive statistics allows the researcher to present data in a more meaningful way,
making data interpretation easier (Siedlecki, 2020). Correlation, on the other hand, shows the
strength of a relationship between two variables and is expressed numerically by the correlation
coefficient. It measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other
(Investopedia, 2021).
Research Locale
This study will be conducted in Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital. The following
critical areas will be focused in this study, Intensive care unit, cardiac care unit, emergency
room, operating room, pediatric ICU, neonatal ICU and labor and DeliveryThere will be 100
nurse respondents that will be surveyed that are currently working in the areas.
Sampling Procedure
There are total of 45 staff nurses that are working in each critical areas in Prince
Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital. There are total of 315 nurses if all critical areas will be
combined. Simple Random sampling techniques will be used in selecting the 174-sample
population using the Rao soft formula. The margin or error is 5% with 95 confidence level.
Simple random Sampling will be used to select respondents of the study. Random Sampling
refers to a variety of selection techniques in which sample members are selected by chance but
with the known probability of the selection. Inclusion criteria are the following: 1. Nurses must
work for at least two years in the critical area, 2. Nurses must be willing to participate in the
study, 3. Nurses must be not regularly floated or assigned in the mentioned critical areas.
Exclusion criteria in selecting respondents are, 1. Nurses that are in managerial position, 2.
Nurses that are not assigned regularly in direct patient care.
Scope and Delimitation:
This study main objective is to assess the level of satisfaction of nurses in the use of EHR
and to assess the quality of patient care that they give to their client based on the nurse
perspective not on the patient side. The level of HER satisfaction use will be correlated to the
quality of patient care they rendered. This study is limited only for 2 months for conducting the
actual survey. Only the data generated in the survey questionnaire will be assessed.
Research Instrument
The researcher will use survey questionnaire that composed of three parts.
First part of the questionnaire will be the sociodemographic profile of the respondents in
terms of their age Age, Sex, Years of service, Monthly Income and Area of assignment. This is a
self-made part of the instrument.
The second part of the instrument is a modified research questionnaire from Family
Practice Management web site, that will assess the level of EHR use satisfaction of the
respondents. Three areas will be assessed which are the functionality, software interfaces and
overall ease and flexibility.
The third part of the questionnaire is the self-assessment of the nurse on the quality of
patient care that is rendered.
Data Gathering Procedure:
The researcher will ask permission from the hospital administration to conduct a study in
the specific areas in the hospitals. List of staff will be obtained in the human resource office and
sample participants will be selected through simple random sampling,
Selected participants will receive email or personal survey form and this will be collected during
or the day after distribution of the questionnaire.
Data Analysis
The researcher will carefully analyze the data that will be gathered. The researcher will use
Simple Frequency Counting, Percentage and Ranking, Weighted Mean and Pearson r in
analyzing the data. The data that will be gathered will be presented in a table and figures.
Simple percentage is used to determine the profile of the respondents. The data was
analyzed using the formula:
Percentage (%) = f/N X 100
Where;
F= is the frequency of the response,
N= is the total number of respondents,
100= is constant to do away with decimal points in the value.
P= Percentage
Weighted mean was used to determine the rank of the reasons for the choice made by the
respondents.
Formula:
n
∑ ❑fi(xi)
i=1
Wm=
N
Where;
Wm= weighted mean
∑= Frequency
Xi= Score points
N= Number of respondents
To get the weighted range: (4-1) 0.75
4
Table 1. The verbal interpretation of the weighted mean:
Score Points Verbal Interpretation Mean Range
1 Always 1.00-1.75
2 Often 1.76-2.50
3 Rarely 2.51-3.25
4 Never 3.26-4.00
Pearson Chi-square Test. This is a statistical tool that is commonly used for testing
relationships between categorical variables.
Formula:
❑ 2
( f 0−f e )
x 2= ∑ ❑
❑ fe
Where:
fo = the observed frequency
fe = the expected frequency if NO relationship existed between the variables
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION
An informed consent will be given to all participants which will be attached to the survey
questionnaire. Assurance will be given to the subjects that anonymity of each individual would
be maintained, and they are free to withdraw from the study at any time. Any information about
the respondents that is obtained as a result of the participation in this research will be kept as
confidential as legally possible. Respondent will also be protected from any harm. Respondents
in the study were informed about the procedure and purpose of the study and confidentiality of
information provided. Consent of all participants will be obtained as part of the study. All data
will be collected anonymously.
References:
Abbott, A. A., Fuji, K. T., & Galt, K. A. (2015). A Qualitative Case Study Exploring Nurse
Engagement With Electronic Health Records and E-Prescribing. Western journal of nursing
research, 37(7), 935–951.
Alice Petiprin, 2020, accessed March 16,
2022<https://nursing-theory.org/nursing-theorists/Sister-Callista-Roy.php>
AlQahtani, M., AlShaibani, W., AlAmri, E., Edward, D., & Khandekar, R. (2021). Electronic
Health Record-Related Stress Among Nurses: Determinants and Solutions. Telemedicine journal
and e-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 27(5), 544–550.
Feder S. L. (2018). Data Quality in Electronic Health Records Research: Quality Domains and
Assessment Methods. Western journal of nursing research, 40(5), 753–766.
Finney Rutten, L. J., Ruddy, K. J., Chlan, L. L., Griffin, J. M., Herrin, J., Leppin, A. L.,
Pachman, D. R., Ridgeway, J. L., Rahman, P. A., Storlie, C. B., Wilson, P. M.,
& Cheville, A. L. (2020). Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness
and implementation of enhanced EHR-facilitated cancer symptom control
(E2C2). Trials, 21(1), 480.
Hewner, S., Sullivan, S. S., & Yu, G. (2018). Reducing Emergency Room Visits and In-
Hospitalizations by Implementing Best Practice for Transitional Care Using Innovative
Technology and Big Data. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 15(3), 170–177.
Kristen Lee,2021, HealthIT, accessed March 16,
2022<https://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/electronic-health-rec ord-EHR>
Medicare and Medicais, accessed March 16,
2022<https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/E-Health/EHealthRecords>
Richesson, R. L., Horvath, M. M., & Rusincovitch, S. A. (2014). Clinical research informatics
and electronic health record data. Yearbook of medical informatics, 9(1), 215–223.
Pamela Salon, 2021, accessed March 16, 2022<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/emr-philippines-
amidst-covid-19-pandemic>
Samuels, J. G., McGrath, R. J., Fetzer, S. J., Mittal, P., & Bourgoine, D. (2015). Using the
Electronic Health Record in Nursing Research: Challenges and Opportunities. Western
journal of nursing research, 37(10), 1284–1294.
Master of Arts in Nursing
PART 1: SOCIO- DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
A. Age as of last birthday:_________
B. Sex
o Male
o Female
C. Years of service:_________
D. Monthly Income
o Below 4,000 riyals
o 4,001 – 6,000 riyals
o 6,001 – 8,000 riyals
o 8,001 above
E. Area of assignment
o Intensive care unit
o ICU- Stepdown
o Cardiac care unit
o Emergency room
o Operating room
o Pediatric ICU
o Neonatal ICU
o Labor and Delivery
o Hemodialysis Unit
PART 2: LEVEL OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SATISFACTION
Scale for the level of satisfaction
Scale Interpretation Verbal Description
4 Very Highly Satisfied The provision is observed 76-100% of the time
3 Highly Satisfied The provision is observed 51-75% of the time
2 Less Satisfied The provision is observed 26-50% of the time
1 Least Satisfied The provision is observed 0-25% of the time
FUNCTIONALITY 1 2 3 4
How satisfied are you with the way your EHR
allows you to perform the following :
1) Obtain and review lab and radiology results
2) Review and document progress and vital
signsnotes
3) Review data in flowchart form on demand
(e.g. vital signs, lipids, growth curves)
4) Review chart information (overall)
5) Create notes using only “point and click
technology” (no typing, transcription or voice
recognition)
6) Create and maintain medication lists
7) Document patient care (overall)
8) Track preventive care (overall) e.g. Identify
allergies
9) Manage referrals (overall)
10) Communicate electronically with office staff
regarding patient management
11)Provide patient education (overall)
12)Find patients with certain characteristics (e.g.,
all patients on a recalled drug)
13)Work without paper
SOFTWARE INTERFACES 1 2 3 4
For each software interface (electronic interface)
between your EHR and another system, how
satisfied are you with the way the interface
works?
14)Interface not present Practice management
system
15)Laboratory system
16)Radiology system
17)Commercial pharmacies (e.g., SureScripts
software)
18)Hospital information system
OVERALL EASE AND FLEXIBILITY 1 2 3 4
19)This EHR allows individual user-specific
customization.
20)This EHR minimizes user data input.
21)This EHR offers multiple note creation
options.
22)This EHR is fast (minimal wait between
screens, minimal boot-up time, etc.).
PART 3: LEVEL OF QUALITY PATIENT CARE
Scale for the level of quality patient care as perceived by the nurse
Scale Interpretation Verbal Description
4 Excellent The level is highest at 76-100%.
3 Very Good The level is high at 51-75%.
2 Fair The level is low at 26-50%.
1 Poor The level is lowest at 0-25%
LEVEL OF QUALITY PATIENT CARE 1 2 3 4
Based on your own perception as nurse,
rate the quality of patient care received
1. I organize my full patient assignment
appropriate to my clinical area
2. I am administering medications in a timely
manner
3. I address the needs of the whole patient,
not just the necessary tasks to be completed
4. I am managing all required aspects of
intravenous therapy, including insertion, site
assessment, bag changes, medication
administration, total parenteral nutrition,
central line management, and peripheral site
removal
5.I can differentiate between important patient
information and noncritical information for
patient management
6.I am prepared to provide physicians with
information about their patients to assist with
care decision-making
7.I have the ability to react appropriately in an
emergency situation
8.I have the ability to manage technical
aspects of patient care
9.I communicate clearly to ensure patient
safety (using such as repeat back and ISBAR)
10.I can prevent possible patient safety
incidents in nursing care
11.I can identify possible patient safety
incidence
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION!