Production of Styrene
Production of Styrene
ONE
INTRODUCT
ION
1
1.1Formula C8H8 Chemistry
Styrene is a certain organic chemical having the chemical formula C6H5CH=CH2.
Its chemical structure is made up of a group bonded onto a benzene ring. This
benzene ring makes styrene an aromatic compound.
Styrene is a clear, colorless liquid that is derived from petroleum and natural
gas by-products.
Other names for styrene can be styrol, vinyl benzene, phenylethene, or phenyl
ethylene.
Figure1.1 Chemical
structure of styrene
2
soluble in alcohol , ether acetone ,and carbon disulphide ; It is incompatible
with oxidizers , catalysts for vinyl polymers ,peroxides ,strong acids .and
aluminum chloride .
Styrene is named after the styrax trees from whose sap (benzoic resin) it can be
extracted. Low levels of styrene occur naturally in plants as well as a variety of
foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, beverages, and meats. The production of
styrene in the United States increased dramatically during the 1940s, when it
was popularized as a feedstock for synthetic rubber.
1.1.2 Sources
Styrene is one of the most important monomers worldwide, and its polymers
and copolymers are used in an increasingly wide range of applications.
3
The major uses are in plastics, latex Paints and coatings, synthetic rubbers,
polyesters and styrene-alkyd coatings Among the top 50 chemicals worldwide,
styrene was twentieth in 1994 with production of 11 270 million pounds.
Styrene occurs naturally as a degradation product in cinnamic acid Containing
plants, e.g. balsamic trees, and as a by-product of fungal and microbial
metabolism.
Styrene has been detected in the atmosphere in many locations. Its presence in
air is principally due to emissions from industrial processes involving styrene
and its polymers and Copolymers. Other sources of styrene in the environment
include vehicle exhaust, cigarette smoke and other forms of combustion and
incineration of styrene polymers.
The concentration of styrene in urban air is relatively low compared with that
for aromatic hydrocarbons, such as toluene and xylene. This appears to be due
to the ready reactivity of Styrene with ozone to yield benzaldehyde and
peroxides, all of which are irritants; one of peroxide, peroxybenzyol nitrate, is a
potent eye irritant. Styrene is an active component of photochemical smog.
Some liberation of styrene may also take place from recently manufactured
plastic goods. While this may contribute to indoor levels of styrene, the effect
on total emissions to the environment is negligible.
1.1.3 Applications
5
1.2Production of Styrene
The crude styrene, with an average composition of 37% styrene, 61% ethyl
benzene, 1.0% toluene, 0.7% benzene, and 0.3% tars, is passed through a pot
containing sulfur or some other polymerization inhibitor and is then fed into a
vacuum column system. The overhead from a primary fractionating column is
fractionated to separate the ethyl benzene, which is Recycled, from the
benzene and toluene, which are separated by distillation. The bottoms from a
primary fractionating column are distilled to obtain the pure styrene product .
6
The reactions for styrene production are as follows:
1
C6 H 5C2 H 5 C6 H 5C2 H 3 H2
2
ethylbenzene styrene hydrogen
3
C6 H 5C2 H 5 C6 H 6 C2 H 4
ethylbenzene benzene ethylene
4
C6 H 5C2 H 5 H2 C6 H 5CH 3 CH 4
ethylbenzene hydrogen toluene methane
7
Ethyl benzene is oxidized to the hydro peroxide, which is then reacted with
propylene to yield the propylene oxide and a co-product, methyl phenyl
carbinol. The carbinol is then dehydrated to styrene . Expected impurities may
include propylbenzene, isopropyl benzene, and alpha-methyl styrene.
8
1.2.5 Oxy dehydrogenation of 4-vinylcyclohexene
9
1.2.6 Production of styrene from toluene and methanol
Styrene can be produced from toluene and methanol, which are cheaper raw
materials than those in the conventional process. Historically, however, this
process has suffered from low selectivity due to competing decomposition of
methanol. Excellus Inc. claims to have developed this process with
commercially viable selectivity, at (400-425) °C and atmospheric pressure, by
forcing these components through a proprietary zeolitic catalyst. It is reported
that an approximately 9:1 mixture of styrene and ethyl benzene is obtained,
with a total styrene yield of over 60%.
Another developing route to styrene is via benzene and ethane. This process is
being developed by SnamprogettiS.p.A. and Dow. Ethane, along with ethyl
benzene, is fed to a dehydrogenation reactor with a catalyst capable of
simultaneously producing styrene and ethylene. The dehydrogenation effluent
is cooled and separated and the ethylene stream is recycled to the alkylation
unit. The process attempts to overcome previous shortcomings in earlier
attempts to develop production of styrene from ethane and benzene, such as
inefficient recovery of aromatics, production of high levels of heavies and tars,
and inefficient separation of hydrogen and ethane. Development of the process
is on-going.
10
1.2.8 Dehydration of phenyl methylcarbino
11
phenylmethylcarbinol to styrene takes place over a catalyst at 200–280°C.
Titania and alumina are typical catalysts.
This styrene process has not been commercialized, although Dow described an
improved catalyst in the mid-1990s (see note at the end of this chapter). A
catalyst with large ligands that suppresses 4-vinylcyclohexene formation is
nickel in combination with tries-O-phenyl phenyl phosphate. At 80°C and 1
bar, selectivity to 1, 5- cyclooctadiene is 96%. DSM has developed a related
approach to styrene via butadiene. Vinylcyclohexene is dehydrogenated in the
gas phase over a proprietary Pd/MgO catalyst to give ethyl benzene.
The ethyl benzene can then be converted to styrene by conventional techniques.
12
second dehydrogenation to ethylbenzene followed by further dehydrogenation
to styrene. The first dehydrogenation uses a Pd/MgO catalyst. The ethyl
benzene–styrene conversion is conventional.
13
6. The practical size is not limitation on a reactor-exchanger than that in the
isothermal process.
7. By EB dehydrogenation, using reactor with adiabatic and one heated
stage.
8. By EB dehydrogenation, using reactor with two adiabatic stages.
9. are intended to resemble widely-licensed types of units for EB and
styrene manufacture. It is concluded that the competitive processes are
essentially equivalent economically.
10. require a somewhat lower investment.
11. looks slightly cheaper than the dehydrogenation routes, despite a
higher investment.
12. still undergoing process development, appears potentially very
attractive compared with any of the other styrene processes.
13. Highly selective reaction.
14. All carbon steel equipment. Because it we must add an inhibitor such as
TBC inhibitor to prevent corrosion and acceptable color for final
product.
15. Insignificant amounts of xylenes are produced, providing highest product
quality.
in these method we can used the following composition of catalyst : (62%
Fe2O3, 36% K2CO3, 2% Cr2O3)
14
1.4 Physical properties
15
16
Table 1.2 Worldwide supply and demand for styrene in 1998 (thousand tonnes)
North 5 241
6 763 6 095
America
South 548
400 339
America
Western 4163
4 852 4 040
Europe
Eastern 411
1 176 366
Europe
275
Middle East 555 518
7155
Asia 7 294 6 503
119
Other 112 84
17 945 912
Total 21 152
17
Use
North Western
Asia Other Total
America Europe
3 203
11 239
Polystyrene 2 649 4 409 978
Unsaturate 323
749
d polyester 220 161 45
resins
396
ABS/SAN 2 334
433 1 462 43
resins
Styrene– 410
1 116
butadiene 383 279 44
copolymer
263
SBR and 841
123 270 185
latexes
619
1 633
Other 355 574 85
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Ethylbenzene+Toluene+Benzene
Vent gases
Toluene+Benzene
Feed
Waste water
Air ng
33
CHAPTER
TWO
MATERIAL
BALANCE
34
2.1Basic calculations
Main Reaction:
↔ +
Hence;
12,500/104 =120.1923
Yield=
Yield=0.9
Then:
EB.reacted= =133.547
= = 205.4569
35
= 205.4569- 133.547
= 71.9099
=7622.4494
B =71.49485859
= Tol. = 71.49485859
EB. = 99 wt. %
B = 0.5 wt. %
B=38.4972
= Tol. = 38.4972
36
Side Reaction:
+ +
106 2 92 16 MWT
Selectivity =
= 663.4614
= 115.384
Side reaction:
106 78 28
0.0511 =
37
= 120.1923 -7.2115 =112.9808 =225.9616
= 14298.97
= 21998.4138
The ratio of steam to ethyl benzene input to reactor range between (6-12)
=9
F1 = (input to reactor)
= 21998.4138 +196005.8826
= 218004.2964
St =120.1923*104=12500
EB=9099*106 =7622.4494
Out =0.7771+7.2115+0.41844
38
=8.40704 =773.44768
Out= 0.9166+0.49355+6.1432
=7.55335
=589.1613
=7.2115*16=115.384
=6.1432*28=172.0096
Steam=196005.8826
=112.9808*2=225.9616
F1=218004.2964kg/hr
EB=9.9899%
Tol=0.05045%
BZ=0.05045%
Steam=89.9092%
Reactor F2=218004.2964kg/hr
St=5.73383%
EB=3.49646%
Tol=0.35478%
Bz=0.27025%
CH4=0.052927%
C2H4=0.078901%
H2=0.10365%
39 Steam=89.9092%
2.3Material balance on separator
= 11223.61379
Mole fractions of F
Z = 0.010708
𝑍 = 6.72987*10
Z = 0.010066
Z = 5.47345*10
𝑍 = 7.49049 *10
Z = 6.40701*10
Z = 6.42529*10
Z = 0.970205
k=
40
Where: -
02
0 8596
0 472098
11223 61379
0 472098
7624 23003
3599 38376
1 6406439 10
41
02
3 2812879 10
2 5017294
230 159105
543 288575
7 4393927 10
6 39490199 10
𝑍 4 8756203
𝑍 380 298389
𝑍 208 8629104
172 0096
42
Material balance on CH4 (from the top)
115 384
225 9616
196005 882
12500
7622 4494
checking on separator
218004 2964
172.0096+115.384+225.9616+230.159105+380.298389
43
1123 812694
196005 8826
20874 60089
218004 2964
218004 2964
F4=1123.8126kg/hr
C2H4=15.30589%
CH4=10.26719%
H2=20.1067%
Tol=20.4802%
Bz=33.84%
F3=218004.2964kg/hr F6=20874.60089kg/hr
St=5.73383% St=59.8813%
EB=3.49646% EB=36.5154%
Tol=0.35478% Tol=2.6026%
Bz=0.27025% Bz=1.0056%
CH4=0.052927%
C2H4=0.078901% Separator
H2=0.10365% F5=196005.8826kg/hr
Steam=89.9092% Water=100%
44
2.4material balance on distillation section
99
05
99 12500
05
9 63 1313
B.Z in stream(9)
99
05 Z
99 12500
05 Z
Z 9 63 1313
9 0 99 12500
9 12375
2 9
38 4972 63 1313
101 6285 2
Z 2 Z Z 9
45
38 4972 63 1313
101 6285 Z 2
7
1
8
7 441 660075
Z 7
Z 1
8
107 2344104
548 89448
7 125
20200 7064
46
F7=673.8944kg/hr
Tol=65.5384%
Bz=15.9126%
St=18.5488%
R=7699.4438kg/hr
EB=99%
Tol=0.5%
F6=20874.60089kg/hr Bz=0.5%
St=59.8813%
EB=36.5154%
Tol=2.6026%
Bz=1.0056%
F8=20200.7064kg/hr
St=61.2602%
Bz=0.50309%
Tol=0.50309%
EB=37.7335%
F9=12501.2626kg/hr
St=98.99%
Bz=0.5049%
Tol=0.5049%
47
CHAPTER
THREE
ENERGEY
BALANCE
48
3.1Energy Balance on the mixing point 1
1 2
1 R 2
∑ ( ) ∑ ( ) ∑ ( )
1 ∑ ( )
Eth. Tol BZ
Eth ( )
121942 0004
Tol ( )
0 7771 785 07
610 0788
BZ ( )
1 123171 4881
49
R ∑ ( )
Eth. 𝑍
Eth ( )
1546564 251
To l ( )
7784 5655
BZ ( )
7898 1473
R 1562246 964
1 R 1685418 452
2=∑
Eth Tol BZ
50
0 0 036050038 12 71233 35797 3085 12178491 92
By using MATLAB
T2=341.51 k
QMX =∑ ∫ ∑ ∑ ∫
QEth. = ∫ ∫
11292180 74
QTol = ∫ ∫
59395 0169
QBZ = ∫ Z ∫
60107 93701
HX 1141683 69
steam 1141183 69
51
1 101 325 220 2914 904
steam
̇
M=
M = 52185.589
QHX =∑ ∫ ∑ ∑ ∫
QEth. = ∫ ∫
11491857 37
QTol = ∫ ∫
59442 5462
QBZ = ∫ Z ∫
62391 6861
HX 11613691 6
steam 11613691 6
52
steam
̇
M=
M 48646 17
4 5
4 𝑍
QEth. = ∫ ∫
17133997 43
QTol = ∫ ∫
86410 3475
QBZ = ∫ Z ∫
87050 3719
4 17307458 15
5 5 𝑍
53
QEth. = ∫ ∫
36714898 62
QTol = ∫ ∫
180746 6089
QBZ = ∫ Z ∫
238433 7942
∫ ∫ t
716192523 3
5 753326602 3
heat of steam = ∫ ∫
60483638 17 443005962 3 + ∫
54
351100 9818 10 47433 0 0383
9 7894 10 134216465 5
steam
736019144 2
By using MATLAB
947 46
Where:
55
3.6 Energy balance around reactor
Therefore:
6 5
5 753326602 3
̇ 117650
̇ 105500
̇ 54640
∑( ̇ )
6 6
56
( ) ∫
Where :
( )
( )
Enthalpy of Styrene
57
Enthalpy of Toluene
Enthalpy of Benzene
Enthalpy of Steam
∫ ∑
58
6
372702750 1 347089 1564 78 0401
0 027603 3 9971049 10
By using MATLAB
849 75
∫ ∑
59
7 2115 9229 7694 66560 4827
71365044 57
∫ ∑
70711386 77
60
3.9 Energy Balance around fifth heat exchanger
∫ ∑
55495198 04
61
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
For water
∫ ∫
62
17462989 48 443005962 3 19940024 71
480408976 5
∫ ∑ ∫ ∑
279375 2739
491176983 2
Where:
∫ ∑
63
∫ ∑
42422805 99
191104 6581
42613910 65
40543612 64
∫ ∑
1825196 028
245101 9801
412 69 384 15
64
20874 60089 2 4169 412 69 348 15
3256179 592
Mole fraction:
Component
Ethyl
71.9098 0.3582 ------ -------- 71.9099 0.3719
Benzene
Benzene 2.6912 0.013409 1.3748 0.18636 1.3029 6.739*10
For calculate :
65
*So the temperature at feed point is ( )
=∑
410.918 k
*So from Antoine-equation can find the partial pressure and after that can find
the pressure at the feed point.
Component A B C
Ethyl Benzene 16.0195 3272.47 -59.95
Benzene 15.9008 2788.51 -52.36
Toluene 16.0137 3096.52 -53.67
Styrene 16.0193 3328.57 -63.72
So,
847 43
652 64
3505 3
1617 72
For calculate :
66
847 43
1 506
562 547
3505 3
6 231
562 547
1617 72
2 875
562 547
652 64
1 16
562 547
795 8642
2 416
5776599 915
67
Calculation of :
First trial:
Assume that
412 69
So,
847 43
652 64
3505 3
1617 72
Second trial:
395
519.25
392.17
2350.75
68
1034.6
Third trial:
383K
361 25
268.82
1749.57
743.38
Fourth trial:
360
69
166.182
931.31
366.96
119.672
Fifth trial:
370
236.23
172.7
1238.87
505.12
Sixth trial:
368 55
70
224.8
1189.99
164.3
482.86
T=368.55 K
2 3955
113647 7081
Calculation of QB:
Assume that =
First trial:
, =412.69 K
=847.43 mmHg
71
=3505.3 mmHg
=652.64 mmHg
=1617.72 mmHg
Second trial:
=409 K
=768.26 mmHg
=3235.57 mmHg
=589.39 mmHg
=1479.12 mmHg
Third trial:
TB, Assume=405 K
=689.146 mmHg
=2960.975 mmHg
=526.42 mmHg
=1339.42 mmHg
72
So, total pressure is 607.95mmHg
Fourth trial:
TB, Assume=402.2 K
=637.69 mmHg
=2779.38 mmHg
=485.61 mmHg
=1247.85 mmHg
=∑ *
QB =m* *
=20200.7064*2.3955*(402.2-298.15)
=5035061.926
Distillation temperature:
̅ ∑ ⁄
73
The most plentiful component is toluene, because 0 65072
Component
Ethyl Benzene
0.5238 --------
̅ 1 12022
3096 52
502 174 16 0137
53 67
T=369.81 K
369 81
0 65072
74
Component ⁄
Ethyl Benzene 0
Styrene 0.4038
Benzene 0.0859
Toluene 0.65072
Total Summation 1.14042
∑
⁄
3096 52
641 539 16 0137
53 67
377 91
For calculate :
377 91
369 81
75
∫ 40 5499 82 2628 10 4 9792 10
109 8953 10
1598 941 ⁄
∑Xi=1
∑ ∑ 1
1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
Ѱ=0.05
0 05
200 6986
10 0349
L=F-V
76
L=200.6986-10.0349
L=190.6636
190 6636
25
7 3773
1604 991
In the re-boiler:
̅ ∑ ⁄
Component
Ethyl Benzene
1.2982 0.4828
Styrene 1 0.6155
Toluene 2.875 0.01652
Benzene 5.3715 1.15092
Total summation 10.5447 1.15092
̅ 1 15092
75
65 1652 488 7796
1 15092
77
3328 57
488 7796 16 0193
63 72
402 42
For calculate :
0 6155
Component ⁄
∑
⁄
3328 57
509 1605 16 0193
63 72
403 83
=2.3955
78
For calculate :
402 42
403 83
67289 7481
Component of liquid
Ethyl Benzene 2.581
Benzene 2.285
Toluene 2.455
Styrene 2.2846
Total Summation 9.6056
Mole fraction:
Component
Ethyl Benzene
71.9099 0.3719 71.9099 0.9874 ------ ------
Benzene 1.3029 6.739*10 0.4935 6.8545*10 0.8092 6.716*10
Toluene 1.1096 5.748*10 0.4184 5.7455*10 0.686 5.684*10
Styrene 118.9903 0.6155 ---------- ------ 118.99 0.9876
Total Summation 193.3127 1.00 72.2818 1.00 120.48 1.00
79
∑
For calculate :
=403.83 K
So from Antoine-equation can find the partial pressure and after that can find
the pressure at the feed point.
So,
667.264
509.0542
2884.0497
1300.55
For calculate
1.1867
5.1267
80
2.3118
0.9049
588.38
2 3955
5113938 918
Calculation of :
First trial:
Assume that
403 83
So,
667 264
509 0542
2884 0497
1300.55
396
534 5659
2407 0909
1062.3896
404 2102mmHg
So,
Third trial:
396 75
546 2846
2450 0065
1082.88
413 432
So,
T=396.75 k
82
As a same rule find the
Component
Ethyl Benzene 71.9099 0.9874
2 5782
1957279 612
Calculation of
First trial:
Assume that
403 83
667 264
509 0542
2884.0497
83
1300 55
So,
Second trial:
405
689 1467
2960 975
526.4235
1339 4201
So,
Third trial:
405 97
707 3278
3024 555
84
540.8706
1371 6369
Component
Ethyl Benzene
--------- ---------
Styrene 118.99 0.9876
Benzene 0.8092 6..716*10
Toluene 0.686 5.684*10
Total Summation 120.48 1.00
2 2832
3077493 62
Distillate temperature:
̅ ∑ ⁄
85
̅
*The most plentiful component is Ethyl Benzene , because
0 9874
Component
Ethyl Benzene
1 0.9874
Benzene 4.3222 0.02962
Toluene 1.94907 0.01119
Total Summation 7.27127 1.02821
̅ 1.028
75
72 9422 547 11
1 02821
389 8
0 9874
Component ⁄
86
∑
⁄
3272 47
557 989 16 0195
57 95
397 486
For calculate :
397 486
389 8
129 210 10
1433 885 ⁄
∑Xi=1
87
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
Ѱ=0.08
0 08
193 3127
15 465
L=F-V
L=193.3127-15.465
L=177.8476
177 8476
2 46
72 2818
15 465 -1433.885
22175
In the re-boiler
̅ ∑ ⁄
88
̅
Component
̅ 1.04016
75
72 1042 540 82
1 04016
3328 57
540 8265 16 0193
63 72
405 94
For calculate
0 987614
Component ⁄
Benzene 1.0089*10
Toluene 2.2249*10
Styrene 0.9876
Total Summation 0.9908
89
∑
⁄
For calculate :
405 94
407 01
=18439.092*2.2832(407.01-405.94)
=45047.1458
=75 Kpa
=101.325 Kpa
90
M=673.89
Basis 1 hour
M=673.89 Kg
∑ At 369.81 K
= 802.004
= 0 84
=V *(
=0.84*(101.325-75)
=22.113 KJ
= = =31.59 KJ
=31.59=∫
=394.65 K
=75 Kpa
=101.325 Kpa
M=12501.2626
91
Basis 1 hour
M=12501.2626 Kg
∑ At 407.01 K
= 801.41
= 15 599
=V *(
=15.599*(101.325-75)
=410.65 KJ
= = =586.633 KJ
=∫
=408.08 K
=99.994Kpa
=101.325 Kpa
M=196005.8826
92
Basis 1 hour
M=196005.8826 Kg
∑ At 348.15 K
= 199 9305
=V *(
=199.9305*(101.325-99.994)
=266.1075 KJ
= = =380.153 KJ
=∫
=349.2 K
93
389.8 k Ethylbenzene+Toluene+Benzene
849.75 k
348 k
Vent gases 377.91 k 369.81 k
394.65 k
Toluene+Benzene
369.81 k
402.2 k
407.01 k
947.46 k 408.08 k
styrene
405.94 k
Air ng
94
CHAPTER
FOUR
EQUIPMENT
DESIGN
95
4.1 Reactor design
8 10 8 8 2
35500
8 44 10
Where:
1 987
96
0
10889 2157
81 5384
133 547
82 5384
1 1
82 5384 82 5384
1
90
82 5384
35500 1
8 44 10 ( ) ( 90)
82 5384
1
298 944 329 503
82 5384 82 5384
29 885 39 939
82 5384 82 5384
43 0798
0 65
43 2126
97
43 0798 43 2126
43 1462
2
35500
8 44 10 ( )
1 987 *903 2726 7754 ( )+
82 5384
1
( 90)
82 5384
35500
7 596 10 ( )
1 987 *903 2726 7754 ( )+
82 5384
1
( )
82 5384
∫
( ) ( )
35500 1
( )
1 98 903 2726 7754 ( ) 82 5384
82 5384
∫ 2( )
2
3 230758946 10
3 864571965 10
98
4 682174784 10
5 764859987 10
7 2483875 10
9 377483797 10
1 264209401 10
1 500659986 10
0 , 0 65 , 7
0 65 0
3 230758946 10 2 3 864571965 10
2 7
4 682174784 10 5 764859987 10 7 2483875
10 9 377483797 10 1 264209401 10
1 500659986 10
4 893409063 10
8 6032 3
4
1 54
4 62
99
Where :
For packed bed reactor volume and catalyst weight are related through the
equation:
Where:
e: porosity
v: volume of reactor ( )
30192 9304
4 3016
7019
Where:
1 54
4 3016
4
100
2 31
2 8
4 3 6
4
3
Where:
6
750
8 10
Where:
8 314
101
0 018514 106 1 07725 10 92
1 27058 10 78 0 9812 18
19 644
2400 19 644
6 2797
8 314 903
218004 2964
34715 718 9 62
6 2797
0 5 4 3016
0 23
9 62
Where :
0 5 2 31
5 02
0 23
1
1
Where:
35
102
∑
3 3429 10
1 05
5 02
35 1 05 750 3 3429 10 2 31
30527 4
30 52 0 3052
Nozzles
293
Where:
293 60 55 6 2797
1306 62 1 306
103
4.2 Heat Exchanger Design
The heat exchanger which is used as cooler to cool the mixture of gases from
reactor column from 276.6 to 146.6 by using steam, gases is corrosive
and high tem. so he will be on tube side.
Operating Condition:
Step 1: Specifications:
1 981
1 657 10
104
Where:
19 422 2300
11 0842
8 314 484 75
1 9139
139 7277 10
18 2400
12
8 314 418 15
105
218004 2964
1 9581 276 6 146 6 1 9581 180 110
3600
115 Where:
15414 9
For exchanger of this type the overall coefficient will be take 600
We use shell and tube heat exchanger, and start with one shell pass and two
tube passes.
276 6 146 6
1 76
118 110
180 110
0 41
276 6 110
106
0 76 61 82 47 57
15414 10
540
600 47 57
triangular pitch.
4 88 4 88 2 0 025 4 83
19 10 4 83 0 2881
540
1874
0 2881
1874
2 937
2
107
15 10 1 76625 10
4
218004 2964
5 463
3600 11 0842
5 463
33
0 1654
2 0 249 2 207
1874
19 1084 53
0 249
For a split – ring floating head exchanger the typical shell clearance
1084 53 72 1156 53
11 0842 33 15 10
33112
1 657 10
( )
108
4 83
322
15 10
3 099 10
0 03698
3 099 10 33112 8 77 518
15 10
This is clearly too low if is to be 600 the tube-side velocity did look
low, so increase the number of tube passes to 4 , This will halve the cross-
sectional area in each pass and double velocity .
2 33 66
2 33112 66224
3 9 10
0 03698
3 9 10 66224 8 77 1303
15 10
4 0 175 2 285
1874
19 1102 33
0 175
1102 33 74 1176 33
1 25 1 25 19 23 75
109
23 75 19
1176 33 529 34 10 0 1245
23 75
115
9 5833
12
9 5833
76 9
0 1245
11 11
( 0 917 ) 23 75 0 917 19
19
13 5
12 76 9 13 5 10
89157
139 7277 10
1 6 10
0 288
1 601 10 89157 9 28 6351 9
13 5 10
1 1 1
2
Where :
50
19
1 1 1 0 019 19 19
15
6351 9 8000 2 50 15 1303 15 5000
110
643 99
Tube side:
3 10
[8 2 5]
2
4 83 11 084 66
4 [8 3 10 2 5] 987 6
15 10 2
Shell side:
2 3 10
8 ( ) ( )
2
4 83 1176 23 12 76 6
8 2 3 10 ( ) ( )
529 10 13 5 2
5153 19
Could be reduced by increasing the baffle pitch .Doubling the pitch halves the
shell side velocity ,which reduces the pressure drop by factor of approximately
5153 19 1
323 07
4 2
111
This will reduce the shell side heat transfer coefficient by a factor of
where
293
The vessel support used for the heat exchanger is two saddles.
112
CHAPTER
FIVE
PLANT
LAYUOT&
TREATMENT
113
5.1 plant layout
The laying out of a plant is still an art rather than a science. It involves the
placing of equipment so that the following are minimized:
2- Maintenance costs.
5- Construction costs.0
All of these goals cannot be met. For example, to reduce potential losses in case
of fire, the plant should be spread out, but this would also result in higher
pumping costs, and might increase manpower needs. The engineer must decide
within the guidelines set by his company which of the aforementioned items are
most important (William)
The location of the plant can have a crucial effect on the profitability of a
project, and the scope for future expansion. Many factors must be considered
when selecting a suitable site, the principle factors to consider are:
1-Marketing area:
For materials that are produced in bulk quantities; such as cement, mineral
acids, and fertilizers, where the cost of the product per tone is relatively low
and the cost of transport a significant fraction of the sales price, the plant
should be located close to the primary market. This consideration will be less
important for low volume production, high-priced products; such as
pharmaceuticals.
Raw materials
114
The availability and price of suitable raw materials will often determine the site
location. Plants producing bulk chemicals are best located close to the source of
the major raw material; where this is also close to the marketing area.
3- Transport
The transport of materials and products to and from the plant will be an
overriding consideration in site selection.
4- Availability of labor
Labor will be needed for construction of the plant and its operation. Skilled
tradesmen will be needed for plant maintenance.
5- Utilities (services)
Chemical processes invariably require large quantities of water for cooling and
general process use, and the plant must be located near a source of water of
suitable quality. Process water may be drawn from a river, from wells, or
purchased from a local authority.
All industrial processes produce waste products, and full consideration must be
given to the difficulties and cost of their disposal. An environmental impact
assessment should be made for each new project, or major medication or
addition to an existing process.
Sufficient suitable land must be available for the proposed plant and for future
expansion. The land should ideally be flat, well drained and have suitable load-
bearing characteristics.
8- Climate
115
5.1.2: Site Layout
The process units and ancillary buildings should be laid out to give the most
economical flow of materials and personnel around the site. Hazardous
processes must be located at a safe distance from other buildings. The ancillary
buildings and services required on a site, in addition to the main processing
units (Buildings) will include:
1- Storages for raw materials and products: tank farms and warehouses.
2- Maintenance workshops.
116
5.1.3: Styrene Monomer Plant Location:
This location will provide to the plant utilities which need since it near Al-
Samawa Refinery which provide low cost of transport requirement of ethylene,
also labors and local community which satisfied the labor requirement.
117
Styrene is mildly toxic and inflammable, and it can polymerize violently under
specific conditions. However, none of the hazard associate with styrene is
severe, and it is considered a relatively safe organic chemical when handled
according to appropriate safe guards. Styrene has an odor threshold of .05-.15
ppmv. Both liquid and vapor irritate the eye and respiratory system, and high
vapor concentration results in depression of central nervous system. Irritation of
eye and respiratory tract occurs at 400-500 ppmv, but does not result in
permanent injury. Test animals for one hr serious systematic effects can tolerate
concentration up to 2500 ppmv. Exposure for 30-40 min to a conc. of 10000
ppmv may be fatal.
Styrene is low in oral toxicity. Contact with eyes is painful, but results in
transient
damage. Short term contact with skin, do not cause irritation; however
prolonged contact may cause swelling, blistering. However, styrene as it is
commonly store and transported contains TBC, which is skin sensitizer. Styrene
monomer is flammable and can form explosive mixture with air at atmospheric
ambient condition. It is generally suggested to store & handle styrene below or
at atmospheric temp. Polymerization of styrene is an exothermic reaction and
proceeds slowly at room temperature. Thus, there is potential for a runaway
polymerization reaction, which may results in an accelerating evolution of
styrene vapor that may cause fire or rupture in the confining vessel. The
polymerization reaction is generally been prevented by adding TBC inhibitor.
Effective inhibition of polymerization by TBC occurs in presence of dissolved
oxygen, and so storage in an atmosphere-permeable tank is preferred, where
inert gas blanketing of the stored material is to be done. Periodic air addition is
recommended to maintain the
118
presence of dissolved oxygen. For the areas, where, average temperature is over
27o C, additional refrigeration is required.
MEASURES:
• The reactor is generally made adiabatic, and the reaction is endothermic. The
• The heavy end from the final column, contain styrene polymers and some
styrene derivatives, which have good economical values. However, disposal of
this heavy end causes problem. So by adopting proper separation method it is
desired to separate those components of high economical values.
119
CAHPTER SIX
ECONAMIC
COST
120
6.1: Economic Studies
To determine whether a project is feasible and attractive enough for investment,
Acceptable plant design must present a process that is capable of operating
under conditions which will yield a profit.
Economic Potential
EP = Revenue – Raw Material
Compare between:
1-Recycle Stream Neglected, 2-Recycle Stream Include
Recycle Stream NEGLECTED
EP = (Styrene Cost) – (Ethyl benzene Cost +Toluene Cost + Benzene Cost)
So, before including recycle stream:
EP = 61764914.65 $ – 147738127.5 $
= - 859732212.85 $ (negative value)
Economic Potential 1 (EP1)
EP1 = Revenue – Raw Material
EP = (Styrene Cost) – (Ethyl benzene Cost +Toluene Cost + Benzene Cost)
So, by including recycle stream:
EP1 = 61764914.65 $ - 28820478.2 $
= 32944436.45 $ (positive value)
121
6.2.1 Reactor cost
4 62
1 54
2013
2013 2004
2004
135 75
2013 19000
111
4 3016 550
2365
2013
23236 2365
25602
122
6.2.2 shell and tube heat exchanger cost
540
2013
2013 2004
2004
135 75
64 000 78 270 27 78 270
111
123
Appendix A:
Component
Name Name
Component A B C
Styrene 16.0193 3328.57 -63.72
Ethyl benzene 16.0195 3272.47 -59.95
Benzene 15.9008 2788.51 -52.36
Toluene 16.0137 3096.52 -53.67
124
Component
Component
C8H10 102.11 5.5959 -1.5609 2.0149
C8H8 66.737 8.4051 -2.1615 2.3324
C6H6 -31.663 13.043 -3.6078 3.8243
C7H8 83.703 5.1666 -1.491 1.9725
CH4 -0.018 11.982 -9.8722 31.67
C2H4 25.597 5.7078 -3.362 8.412
H2 50.607 -61.136 309.3 -4148
H2O 92.053 -0.39953 -0.21103 0.53469
125
A-4: viscosity of gas:
Component
C8H10 -4.267 2.4735 -54.264
C8H8 -10.035 2.5191 -37.932
C6H6 -0.151 2.5706 -8.9797
C7H8 1.787 2.3566 -9.3508
CH4 3.844 4.0112 -143.03
C2H4 -3.985 3.8726 -112.27
H2 27.758 2.12 -32.8
H2O -36.826 4.29 -16.2
126
1. E. Simon, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. (1839) 265.
2. D. H. Steele, MRI Project No. 6450, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas
City, Mo., 1992.
3. R. H. Boundy, R. F. Boyer, (eds.): Styrene, Its Polymers, Copolymers and
Derivatives,
Reinhold Publ. Co., New York 1952; reprinted by Hafner Publishing Corp.,
Darien, Conn., 1970.
4. R. F. Boyer: “Anecdotal History of Styrene and Polystyrene,” in R. Semour
(ed.): History of
Polymer Science and Technology, M. Dekker, New York 1982.
5. Dow Chemical, The Dow Family of Styrenic Monomers, Form No. 115-00
608-1289 X-SAI, Midland, Mich. 1989.
6. W. S. Emerson, Chem. Rev. (1949) 183 ff.
7. K. E. Coulter, H. Kehde, B. F. Hiscock in E. C. Leonard (ed.): High
Polymers, Wiley-Interscience, New York, vol. XXIV, “Vinyl and Diene
Monomers,” part 2: “Styrene and Related Monomers,” 1971.
8. K. Meinel, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. (1934) 129.
9. D. L. Williams, “Styrene Catalysts, Past Present and Future,” AICHE Spring
Meeting, New Orleans, March 1988.
10. Shell Chemical, Technical Bulletin on Shell 005, Shell 105
Dehydrogenation Catalysts,
78 : 14 Houston, Texas 1978.
11. United Catalysts Inc., G-64 & G-84 Product Bulletin, 2nd ed. Louisville,
Ky. 1987.
12. Ullmann, 4th ed., 298.
13. Lurgi, Low Energy Concept for Styrene Production, Technical Brochure
2173 e/4.89.
14. Union Carbide Corp., US 3 282 576, 1966.
15. J. C. Frank, G. R. Geyer, H. Kehde, Chem. Eng. Prog. (1969) no. 2, 79.
16. “Facelift for Distillation,” Chem. Eng. 1987, March 2, 14.
17. D. B. McMullen et al., Chem. Eng. Prog. (1991) no. 7, 187.
18. Sulzer Bros. Inc., GB 1 020 190, 1966.
19. UOP Inc., US 4 435 607, 1984 (T. Imai).
20. K. Egawa et al., Aromatics (1991) 5 – 6.
21. ARCO Chemical, Construction Permit Application for Propylene
Oxide/Styrene Monomer Facility, Channelview, Texas, Texas Air Control
Board Account No. HG-1575W, July 1989.
22. Phillips, US 4 117 025, 1978 (T.C. Liebert, W. A. McClintock).
23. Exxon, US 2 943 117, 1960 (A. H. Gleason).
24. Phillips, US 3 377 397, 1968 (P. L. Maxfiel).
25. Phillips, US 4 144 278, 1979 (D. J. Strope).
26. BASF, US 3 903 185, 1975 (H.-H. Vogel, H.-M. Weitz, E. Lorenz, R.
Platz).
127
27. ARCO, US 4 029 715, 1977 (R.W. Rieve, H. Shalit).
28. Maruzen Oil, US 3 502 736, 1970 (M. Sato, K. Tawara).
29. Montedison, DE 2 612 082, 1976.
30. Monsanto, US 3 965 206, 1976 (H.W. Scheeline, J. J. L. Ma).
31. Monsanto, US 4 115 424, 1978 (M. L. Unland, G. E. Barker).
32. Monsanto, US 4 140 726, 1979 (M. L. Unland, G. E. Barker).
33. Shell Oil, US 5 015 796, 1991 (L. H. Slaugh, T. F. Brownscombe).
34. R. Kuhn, K. Birett: Merkbl¨atter gef¨ahrliche Arbeitsstoffe, Blatt Nr. S 25,
Verlag Moderne Industrie, M¨unchen 1978.
35. EPA-450/4-91-029, 11 – 12, Office of Air Quality, Research Triangle Park,
N. C. T. Wett, Chemical Business, March 1993, 21.
36. SRI International, Styrene, Report 33 C, Menlo Park, Ca., 1993.
37. Chem Systems, Styrene/Ethylbenzene 91-9, Tarrytown, New York, 1992.
38. Dow Chemical, Speciality Monomers Product Stewardship Manual. Form
No. 505-0007-1290 JB, Midland, Mich. 1990.
39. M. Camps, M. Chatzopoulos, J. P. Montheard, J. Macromol. Sci.,
Macromol. Chem. Phys.,
Part C 22 (1982 – 83) no. 3, 343.
40. J. Santodonato et al., “Monograph on Human Exposure to Chemicals in the
Workplace; Styrene,” PB86-155 132, Syracuse Research Corp., Syracuse, N.Y.,
July 1985.
41. The SIRC Review, vol. 1, no. 1 and vol. 1, no. 2. 1275 K St., N.W., Suite
400, Washington, DC 20 005.
42. R. D. Stewart, H. C. Dodd, E. D. Baretta, A.W. Schaffer, Arch. Environ.
Health 16 (1968) 656.
43. R. L. Zielhuis et al.: 14th Int. Congr. Occup. Health, Madrid, 3, 1092.
44. C. P. Carpenter et al., J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. (1944) no. 3, 68.
45. H. Harkonen, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health (1977) 231.
46. M. Oltramare et al.: Editions Medecine et Hygiene, Geneva 1974, p. 100.
47. Y. Alarie, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. (1973) 279.
48. G. Bond, K. Bodner, R. Cook, SIRC Review 1 (1991) no. 1, 43 – 55.
128