Wholeissue 47 8-1
Wholeissue 47 8-1
October/octobre 2021
Crux Mathematicorum is a problem-solving journal at the secondary and university undergraduate levels,
published online by the Canadian Mathematical Society. Its aim is primarily educational; it is not a research
journal. Online submission:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
Crux Mathematicorum est une publication de résolution de problèmes de niveau secondaire et de premier
cycle universitaire publiée par la Société mathématique du Canada. Principalement de nature éducative,
le Crux n’est pas une revue scientifique. Soumission en ligne:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
The Canadian Mathematical Society grants permission to individual readers of this publication to copy articles for
their own personal use.
c CANADIAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ISSN 1496-4309 (Online)
La Société mathématique du Canada permet aux lecteurs de reproduire des articles de la présente publication à des
fins personnelles uniquement.
Editorial Board
Crux Mathematicorum
Founding Editors / Rédacteurs-fondateurs: Léopold Sauvé & Frederick G.B. Maskell
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: G.W. Sands, R.E. Woodrow, Bruce L.R. Shawyer,
Shawn Godin
Crux Mathematicorum
with Mathematical Mayhem
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: Bruce L.R. Shawyer, James E. Totten, Václav Linek,
Shawn Godin
Editorial /371
EDITORIAL
I enjoy a variety of hand crafts and, being a mathematician, I ponder about math
in each of them. I scrapbook and realize how much proportional thinking goes into
photography and design work. I knit and connections to modular arithmetic are
obvious each time I have to follow an intricate pattern. I sew and wonder how it is
possible that my grandmother was such an amazing natural topologist. Recently,
I also picked up embroidery. I am originally from Belarus, where national clothing
and linens are known to be adorned with beautiful red and white embroidered
designs. Various mathematical elements in standard patterns are clear: rotational
and reflection symmetries, parity details, features occurring in multiples and so on.
Different elements mean different things, such as beauty, land, sun, soul, spring.
But having finished my first piece of non-traditional embroidery (I figured I’ll
practice on something more playful before moving onto patterns of cultural signif-
icance), I discovered a deeper connection to the approach and the presentation of
mathematics. Indulge me while I philosophize.
The front of the finished piece is a neatrly “drawn” pattern; like a finished math-
ematical solution or proof, it looks well thoughtout and nicely laid out. But the
reverse side of the embroidery tells a different story: stitches overlap in a disor-
ganized fashion, there are knots for each thread’s beginning and end, there are
straight lines connecting seemingly unrelated points on the pattern. The overall
pattern is still recognizable, but I wouldn’t boast about my skills if this was the
final product. This side is the messy story of creation that we see so seldom in
math. This is unsuccessful solution attempts, trial and error approaches, small ex-
amples, ideas that never worked out, proof write-ups that were deemed not elegant
enough; this is draft work that noone but the craftsperson themself sees.
Every presented solution in Crux makes the work look effortless and immediate,
like the person knew what they were doing from the very first to the last step
with no additional investigations, miscalculations, wrong turns. But do not be
fooled: there is the reverse side to each solution, where the author might have
laboured for hours before arriving at the idea and producing a clean write-up.
Noone’s first draft is their final draft. Practice will make this process faster:
expert problem solvers recognize familiar patterns, know shortcuts and are more
proficient in writing. But no matter how expert, the reverse side is never as perfect
as the front. Though it is necessary: the imperfections make the pattern possible.
Kseniya Garaschuk
MATHEMATTIC
No. 28
The problems featured in this section are intended for students at the secondary school
level.
MA137. Triangle ABC has area 1. X, Y are points on the side AB and Z
a point on the side AC such that XY = 2AX, XZ is parallel to Y C and Y Z is
parallel to BC. Determine the area of triangle XY Z.
MA139. The shape below was created by pasting together 25 unit squares.
When a similar shape is created with n squares, its perimeter is 100 units. Deter-
mine n.
MA140.
If f (x) = 1 − x − x3 , what are all real values of x which satisfy
3
1 − f (x) − (f (x)) > f (1 − 5x)?
.................................................................
Les problèmes proposés dans cette section sont appropriés aux étudiants de l’école sec-
ondaire.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 30 decembre 2021.
MATHEMATTIC
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(3), p. 121–122.
MA111. Peter and Steve had a 50-metre race. When Peter crosses the finish
line, Steve was 5 metres behind. A rematch is set up, with Peter handicapped by
being 5 metres behind the starting line. Assuming that the boys run at the same
speed as before, who wins the race (or is it a tie) and by how much?
Originally from 2000 ESSO-CMS Math Camp, Problem Set 4, problem 5.
We received 6 submissions, of which 5 were correct and complete. We present the
solution by Dominique Mouchet, Lycée Evariste de Parny, St Paul, France.
Notons vp et vs les vitesses de Peter et Steve. Soit t la durée de la première course.
Alors vp = 50/t et vs = 45/t. D’où vp /vs = 10/9. Lors de la 2e course, Steve a
couru pendant une durée ts = 50/vs et Peter une durée
55 55 49, 5
tp = = 10 = < ts .
vp 9· vs vs
O2
O1 X
Y Z
MA113. For any positive number t, btc denotes the integer part of t and
{t} denotes the “decimal” part of t. If x + {y} = 7.32 and y + bxc = 8.74, then
determine {x}.
Originally from 2000 ESSO-CMS Math Camp, Problem Set 3, problem 3.
We received 8 correct solutions for this problem. We present the solution by the
Missouri State University Problem Solving Group.
There are integer n and m such that n ≤ x < n + 1 and m ≤ y < m + 1. Then
bxc = n and {y} = y − m. The two given equations can be written as
x + y − m = 7.32,
y + n = 8.74.
Subtracting, we get
x − n − m = −1.42, or x + 1.42 = n + m.
MA114. Let p, q, and r be positive constants. Prove that at least one of the
following equations has real roots.
px2 + 2qx + r = 0
rx2 + 2px + q = 0
qx2 + 2rx + p = 0
4(q 2 − pr) + 4(p2 − rq) + 4(r2 − qp) = 2[(p − q)2 + (q − r)2 + (r − p)2 ] ≥ 0,
whence
p2 q 2 r2 < (pr)(rq)(qp) = p2 q 2 r2 ,
which is a contradiction. Hence at least one equation must have real roots.
Comments from the editor. One solver assumed, wolog, that p ≤ q ≤ r. This
is fine, but requires a bit of argument. His conclusion that r2 − pq ≥ 0 works
when p, q, r > 0, but not in general. A better approach would be to assume,
wolog, that r, say, has largest absolute value, whereupon r2 − pq ≥ 0 and we can
identify which equation has real roots. Conversely, if p, q, r all have the same sign,
a similar argument (or one along the lines of Solution 2), will ensure that at least
one equation has nonreal roots. When p, q, r do not all have the same sign, then
two equations must have real roots and either possibility obtains for the third.
MA115. I met a person the other day that told me they will turn x years old
in the year x2 . What year were they born?
Inspired by 1982 Fermat Contest, problem 19.
We received 8 submissions, all correct. We present the solution by Bellamy Kas-
tanya of Garth Webb Secondary School in Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
Since the birthday will happen in the future, we are interested in the year in the
near future which is a square. There are two candidates: 2025 and 2116.
If it is 2025, then the person will turn 45. This means that the person was born in
1980. If it is 2116, then the person will turn 46. This means that the person will
be born in 2070 (so, I cannot meet this person yet). So, the only logical solution
is the first one and the person was born in 1980.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
No. 396
The problems featured in this section have appeared in a regional or national mathematical
Olympiad.
OC550. The real numbers x, y, and z are not all equal and satisfy:
1 1 1
x+ = y + = z + = k.
y z x
Determine all possible values of k.
.................................................................
Les problèmes présentés dans cette section ont déjà été présentés dans le cadre d’une
olympiade mathématique régionale ou nationale.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 30 decembre 2021.
OC547. Dans un triangle ABC qui n’est pas équilatéral, soit I le centre du
cercle inscrit et O le centre du cercle circonscrit. Démontrer que ∠AIO ≤ 90◦ si
et seulement si 2BC ≤ AB + AC.
OC550. Les nombres réels x, y et z ne sont pas tous égaux. Ils vérifient
1 1 1
x+ = y + = z + = k.
y z x
Déterminer toute valeur possible de k.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(3), p. 135–136.
OC521. In the plane there are two identical circles with radius 1, which are
tangent externally. Consider a rectangle containing both circles, each side of which
touches at least one of them. Determine the largest and the smallest possible area
of such a rectangle.
Originally from 2018 Czech-Slovakia Math Olympiad, 3rd Problem, Category A,
First Round.
We received 8 solutions. We present 2 solutions.
Solution 1, by UCLan Cyprus Problem Solving Group.
From the figure above we see that the area is equal to A = (2 + x)(2 + y) where
x, y satisfy x2 + y 2 = (O1 O2 )2 = 4.
By Cauchy-Schwarz, we have
» x2 + y 2 √
A = 4 + 2(x + y) + xy 6 4 + 2 2(x2 + y 2 ) + =6+4 2
2
√
with equality if and only if x = y = 2.
p
Since also x + y > x2 + y 2 = 2, then
1
A = 4 + 2(x + y) + xy = 2 + (x + y)2 + 2(x + y) > 8
2
with equality if and only if x = 2, y = 0 or x = 0, y = 2.
Both equality cases can actually be achieved but we omit the figures.
OC522. Find the largest natural number n such that the sum
√ √ √
b 1c + b 2c + · · · + b nc
is a prime number.
Originally from 2018 Czech-Slovakia Math Olympiad, 4th Problem, Category A,
First Round.
We received 13 submissions, of which 10 were correct and complete. We present
the solution by the Missouri State University Problem Solving Group.
Let √ √ √
f (n) = b 1c + b 2c + · · · + b nc.
Note that f (47) = 197, which is prime. We claim that this is the largest n such
that f (n) is prime.
If k 2 ≤ n ≤ (k + 1)2 − 1, then
Ñ 2
é Ñ 2
é
X−1 p
X (i+1)
k−1 n
X p k−1 X−1
X (i+1) n
X
f (n) = b jc + b jc = i + k
i=1 j=i2 j=k2 i=1 j=i2 j=k2
k−1
!
X
= (2i + 1)i + (n + 1 − k 2 )k
i=1
k(k − 1)(4k + 1)
= + (n + 1 − k 2 )k.
6
OC523. Let (an )n≥1 be a sequence such that an > 1 and a2n+1 ≥ an an+2 for
all n ≥ 1. Prove that the sequence (xn )n≥1 defined by xn = logan an+1 for n ≥ 1
is convergent and find its limit.
Originally from 2018 Romania Math Olympiad, 3rd Problem, Grade 11, District
Round.
We received 5 solutions. We present the solution by Oliver Geupel.
Let bn = log an . By an > 1, we have bn > 0. Hence,
1
+ xn+1 ≤ 2. (1)
xn
On the other hand, it holds
1
2≤ + xn . (2)
xn
Therefore, 0 < xn+1 ≤ xn for n ≥ 1. By the monotone convergence theorem, (xn )
is convergent. Putting L = limn→∞ xn , we obtain from (1) and (2) that
1
L+ = 2;
L
whence L = 1.
OC525. Consider the sequence (a1 , a2 , . . . , an ) with terms from the set
{0, 1, 2}. We will call a block a subsequence of the form (ai , ai+1 , . . . , aj ), where
1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ n, and ai = ai+1 = · · · = aj . A block is called maximal if it is not
contained in any longer block. For example, in the sequence (1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1) the
maximal blocks are (1), (0, 0, 0), (2) and (1, 1). Let Kn be the number of such
sequences of length n with terms from the set {0, 1, 2} in which all maximal blocks
have odd lengths. Moreover, let Ln be the number of all sequences of length n
with terms from the set {0, 1, 2} in which the numbers 0 and 2 do not appear in
1
adjacent positions. Prove that Ln = Kn + Kn−1 for all n > 1.
3
Originally from 2018 Poland Math Olympiad, 4th Problem, First Round.
We received 2 solutions. We present the solution by the UCLan Cyprus Problem
Solving Group.
We call a sequence nice if it is a sequence with terms from {0, 1, 2} in which all
maximal blocks have odd length. We also call a sequence good if it is a sequence
with terms from {0, 1, 2} in which the numbers 0 and 2 do not appear in adjacent
positions.
We observe that there is a 1-1 correspondence between nice sequences of length n
and nice sequences of length n + 2 whose last maximal block has length at least 3.
The correspondence is obtained by adding two elements to the sequence of length
n at its end, both equal to the last term of the sequence.
We also observe that there are 2Kn+1 nice sequences of length n + 2 whose last
maximal block has length 1. Indeed every such sequence is obtained from a nice
sequence of length n + 1 by adding at its end a term which is different from the
last term of the sequence.
Thus Kn+2 = 2Kn+1 + Kn for each n > 1. Defining K0 = 0, then the condition
holds for n = 0 as well.
Now let An , Bn , Cn be the number of good sequences of length n whose last term
is equal to 0, 1, 2 respectively. By symmetry we have An = Cn . Then An+1 =
An + Bn and Bn+1 = An + Bn + Cn = 2An + Bn for each n > 1. Defining
A0 = C0 = 0 and B0 = 1, then the condition holds for n = 0 as well. Then
1 Introduction
In the first part of this two-part note [5], we introduced the chromatic number of
the plane problem:
Problem 1 What is χ, the smallest number of sets (“colours”) with which we
can cover the plane in such a way that no two points of the same set are a unit
distance apart? [1]
Through a series of examples and exercises, we guided the reader to establish that
4 ≤ χ ≤ 7. In particular, we used the unit distance graph called the Moser spindle,
Figure 1, to show that χ ≥ 4 since 3 colours are not enough for a proper colouring
that avoids adjacent vertices of the same colour. The Moser spindle was originally
introduced by Canadian mathematicians Leo and William Moser in 1961. [6]
Regardless of all efforts, until very recently, the lower bound for χ, established by
an American mathematician Edward Nelson in the 1950s [12] remained unchanged.
2 de Grey’s theorem
has a chromatic number > 4. I believe such an n exists but its value
may be very large. [3, p.156]
Almost forty years later, in 2018, an English author and biomedical gerontologist
Aubrey de Grey proved that Erdős was correct on both accounts. de Grey con-
structed a unit distance graph with 20425 vertices and with its chromatic number
greater than 4.
Therefore, de Grey proved the following:
Theorem 1 χ ≥ 5. [2]
de Grey’s proof was a combination of new insights into some of the well-known
facts and techniques and a computer assisted mathematical proof. In de Grey’s
words:
In seeking graphs that can serve as [a unit distance graph with the
chromatic number greater than four] in our construction, we focus on
graphs that contain a high density of Moser spindles. The motivation
for exploring
√ such graphs is that a spindle contains two pairs of vertices
distance 3 apart, and these pairs cannot both be monochromatic. In-
tuitively, therefore, a graph containing a high density of interlocking
√
spindles might be constrained to have its monochromatic 3-apart
vertex pairs distributed rather uniformly (in some sense) in any 4-
colouring. Since such graphs typically also contain regular hexagons
of side-length 1, one might be optimistic that they could contain some
such hexagon that does not contain a monochromatic triple in any
4-colouring of the overall
√ graph, since such a triple is always an equi-
lateral triangle of edge 3 and thus constitutes a locally high density,
i.e.
√ a departure from the aforementioned uniformity, of monochromatic
3-apart vertex pairs. [2]
Initially, de Grey “developed a custom program” to test his original graph on
20425 vertices for the existence of monochromatic points with the unit distance
under a 4-colouring. de Grey explained that “this algorithm was implemented
in Mathematica 11 on a standard MacBook Air and terminated in only a few
minutes.”
In the following exercises, we will explore some terms from the above quote and
construct three “tightly linked Moser spindles,” one of the tools that de Grey used
in his proof.
Exercise 1 Use a graphing tool, Desmos or GeoGebra, for example, to construct
the Moser spindle with equilateral triangles of side length 1. Let A be the vertex
of degree four and let C and D be two vertices that are not adjacent to A. Let α
be the measure of ∠DAC in degrees. See Figure 2.
i) Determine |AC| and |AD|.
ii) Determine the value of α.
C
D
iii) Construct the Moser spindle by starting with drawing two concentric circles,
one with radius 1 and the other with radius |AC|.
Exercise 2 Confirm de Grey’s observation
√ from the quote above that “a spindle
contains two pairs of vertices distance 3 apart, and these pairs cannot both be
monochromatic” in a proper k-colouring of the Moser spindle, k > 3.
Exercise 3 Use your graphing tool to rotate clockwise the Moser spindle through
α about the point A to obtain another Moser spindle. Call the newly obtained
graph, i.e. the graph that consists of the original Moser spindle and its image
obtained by the rotation, M S2 . What do you observe? Is this a unit distance
graph? Does M S2 contain a hexagon, not necessarily regular, “of side-length 1?”
Exercise 4 Find a proper 4-colouring of M S2 . Do this in two ways, by hand and
by writing a program that would search for proper 4-colourings of M S2 .
Exercise 5 Alter the drawing of M S2 by rotating clockwise the original Moser
spindle by α2 about the point A. Find a proper 4-colouring of the newly obtained
graph.
We would like to encourage the reader to explore other graphs, tools, and ideas
that de Grey presents in his remarkable paper.
Already in his original paper, de Grey was able to reduce the size of the unit
distance graph with the chromatic number greater than four to 1581. Again, in
de Grey’s words, “Happily, G has turned out to be within the reach of standard
SAT solvers with which others have now confirmed its chromatic number to be 5
without the need to resort to using custom code or checking weaker properties of
subgraphs.”
On August 3, 2019, as part of the Polymath 16 project [9], Jaan Parts from Kazan,
Russia, posted an image of a unit distance graph with 510 vertices and 2508 edges
that confirms that χ ≥ 5.
3 Conclusion
The goals of the researchers involved in the Polymath 16 project included:
1. To further reduce the size of the “good” graph;
2. To find a human-verifiable proof that χ ≥ 5.
Clearly, the two goals are interrelated. A graph of relatively small size found by a
computer may lead to “a human-verifiable proof that χ ≥ 5.” And the other way
around, a moment of human brilliance may provide a proof that would contain,
if not the exact value, then a reasonable bound for the size of the minimal unit
distance graph with a chromatic number greater than four.
It seems that the first scenario is more likely. For example, in their recent paper
that includes some of the authors’ contributions to the Polymath 16 project, Nóra
Frankl, Tamaás Hubai, and Dömötör Pálvölgyi wrote:
Note that G34 [a graph on 34 vertices that cannot be 4-coloured with
the so-called “bichromatic origin”] was found by a computer search,
and for finding other similar graphs one might rely on a computer
program. Thus, the approach we propose, is human-verifiable, however
it might be computer-assisted. [4]
In 2020, Parts contributed to both of the above listed goals. In [7], Parts described
a set of ideas that led to a construction of a 5-chromatic graph with 509 vertices
and 2442 edges. Parts also came up with a human-verifiable proof that χ ≥ 5:
The proof presented here may leave a sediment of dissatisfaction. We
tend to explain this by the fact that we expect not only a human-
verifiable proof, but a really human proof. The difference is that in
the latter case, the proof is created by a person, while in the first case
it is not necessary: it is only important that the person is able to
complete the verification in a reasonable number of steps. [8]
The recent developments in the search for the chromatic number of the plane have
further highlighted the following two realities:
1. Mathematical research has become increasingly collaborative;
2. Computing has become an instrumental part of mathematical research.
The Polymath 16 project is winding down. A paper that will summarize the
outcomes of the project is expected in the near future. In a post dated February
1, 2021, de Grey concluded:
Perhaps the most satisfying aspect of the project, to me, is its quite
remarkable success in attracting amateur mathematicians like myself
(of whom Jaan is one). At least half a dozen of us have been significant
contributors over these three years, working side by side with numerous
professionals including Terry Tao himself. [10]
Still, is χ = 5? Or maybe it is χ = 6? Or, perhaps, χ = 7?
Step 1
C
Start by choosing a point A in
the plane and then draw a circle
with the centre at A and radius
1. Denote this circle by c1 . Next,
draw a circle with
√ the centre at
A A and radius 3. Denote this
circle by c2 . Choose a point C
on the circle c2 .
Step 3
D C Draw a circle with the centre at
D and radius 1. Denote this cir-
cle by c4 . Let E and G be the
F G points of intersection of c1 and
B
E c4 . Draw the line segments AE,
AG, DE, DG, and EG. Observe
A that those line segments are of
length 1. The Moser spindle ap-
pears!
Exercise 2. If both (A, C) and (A, D) are monochromatic then the pair (C, D)
is monochromatic as well.
Exercise 3. Observe that the two spindles share four vertices and five edges.
This is what de Grey meant when saying “interlocking spindles.” Also note that
the outer polygon is a hexagon of side-length 1.
C
Exercise 4. Say that A is the vertex of degree 6. Colour A blue and then colour
the vertices not adjacent to A by yellow and green alternatively. Use blue and red
to colour the remaining vertices. To write a program you may use the following
strategy. Denote the four colours by the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 . Use 0 to
denote the vertex that is not coloured. Then go through each vertex that was not
coloured, get all the numbers of the vertices around it, then colour the vertex by
the lowest positive number that is not in that set. For example, if a vertex had
vertices around it with the numbers 0, 1, 2, and 2, then this vertex would have to
be given the number 3 (which means colour number three).
α
Exercise 5. An additional clockwise rotation by 2 produces, what de Grey
calls,“three tightly linked Moser spindles.”
Use the same idea as in Exercise 4 to find a proper 4-colouring by hand. Al-
ternatively, you may write a program that generates proper 4-colourings. Here
√
Do you notice what de Grey calls “monochromatic 3-apart vertex pairs (. . . ) in
any 4-colouring”?
References
[1] Croft, H.T., Falconer, K.J., and Guy, R.K. Unsolved Problems in Geometry.
Problem Books in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. Unsolved
Problems in Intuitive Mathematics, II.
[2] de Grey, Aubrey D.N.J. (2018), The chromatic number of the plane is at least
5. Geombinatorics, 28, p. 5–18. arXiv:1804.02385.
[3] Erdős, P., Combinatorial problems in geometry and number theory. Proc. of
the Sympos. Pure Math., 34, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (1979), p.
149–162.
[4] Frankl, N., Hubai, T., and Pálvölgyi, D. Almost-monochromatic sets and the
chromatic number of the plane. Proceedings of SoCG 2020. arXiv:1912.02604.
[5] Jungić V., An introduction of the problem of finding the chromatic number of
the plane (I), Crux Mathematicorum, 46 (8), p. 390–396.
[6] Moser, L., and Moser, W., Solution to Problem 10, Can. Math. Bull. 4 (1961),
p. 187–189.
[7] Parts, Jaan. (2020), Graph minimization, focusing on the example of 5-
chromatic unit-distance graphs in the plane, Geombinatorics, 29, p. 137–166.
arXiv:2010.12665.
[8] Parts, Jaan. (2020), The chromatic number of the plane is at least 5 – a human-
verifiable proof, Geombinatorics, 30, p. 11–102. arXiv:2010.12661.
PROBLEMS
Click here to submit problems proposals as well as solutions, comments
and generalizations to any problem in this section.
Find 2 nxn
lim + xn .
n→∞ 3
circle C2 , centered at B and with radius BA, meets the sides AC, BC at points
S, T , respectively. Let A0 be the second intersection point of C1 and C2 and let
O1 , O2 , O3 , O4 , O5 be the circumcenters of triangles CST, SAP, P BQ, BA0 Q, A0 CT ,
respectively. Prove that the points C, O1 , S, O2 , P, O3 , B, O4 , A0 , O5 are concyclic.
.................................................................
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 30 decembre 2021.
Déterminer 2 nxn
lim + xn .
n→∞ 3
SOLUTIONS
No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consider for
publication new solutions or new insights on past problems.
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(3), p. 151–154.
PT TS PT + TS PS
= = = .
QT TR QT + T R QR
That is,
P T · QR = P S · QT. (2)
2
The powers of P and Q with respect to C satisfy both P T · P S = P A and
QT · QR = QB 2 . By multiplying these two equalities and applying equation (2)
we get, in turn,
P T · P S · QT · QR = P A2 · QB 2 ,
(P T · QR) · (P S · QT ) = (P A · QB)2 ,
(P S · QT )2 = (P A · QB)2 ,
P S · QT = P A · QB.
b2 + c2 − a2 c
AD = b · cos A = , and AC 0 = .
2c 2
1 9
Therefore, with AA0 = ma , where m2a = · (2b2 + 2c2 − a2 ) = · AG2 , we get
4 4
b2 + c2 − a2
AA00 = , and therefore
4ma
−→
−−→ AG 3(b2 + c2 − a2 ) −→ −→ a2 + b2 + c2 −→
AA00 = AA00 · = · AG = AG − · AG.
AG 8m2a 8m2a
−−−→ −−→
Adding similar expressions for BB 00 , CC 00 , and using the well-known expression
−→ −−→ −−→ → −
AG + BG + CG = 0 , we get
→
− −−→ −−−→ −−→
0 = AA00 + BB 00 + CC 00
Ç −→ −−→ −−→ å
−→ −−→ −−→ a2 + b2 + c2 AG BG CG
= (AG + BG + CG) − · + 2 + 2
8 m2a mb mc
ma 2 ma 2
®ñÅ ô ñ ô ´
a2 + b2 + c2 −−→ −−→
ã Å ã
= − · − 1 · BG + − 1 · CG .
8m2a mb mc
−−→ −−→
But BG and CG are linearly independent vectors on the plane of the triangle and
therefore we must have ma = mb = mc , and thus a = b = c and the triangle is
equilateral.
p(x) = x2 − 1 = (x − 1)(x + 1)
and
q(x) = x2 − 4 = (x − 2)(x + 2).
p(x) = x2 + 2x − 3 = (x − 1)(x + 3)
and
q(x) = x2 + 4x − 5 = (x − 1)(x + 5).
a b c 3
+ + ≤ .
3+a 3+b 3+c 4
x
Next, define f (x) = 3+x for x > 0 so that f 00 (x) = −6(3 + x)−3 < 0. Hence, f is
concave on (0, ∞) and by Jensen’s inequality
a+b+c 3
f (a) + f (b) + f (c) ≤ 3 · f ( ) = 3 · f (1) = .
3 4
1X
Å ã
X a X a a a
= ≤ +
2a + b + c (a + b) + (a + c) 4 a+b a+c
1X 3
Å ã
a b
= + = .
4 a+b b+a 4
»
ab
Next, define S = 2a+b+c . So, by Cauchy’s inequality, and since a + b + c = 3,
P
X a 3
S 2 ≤ (b + c + a) ≤3· .
2a + b + c 4
Hence, S ≤ 23 . In fact, the conclusion holds under the hypothesis that a+b+c ≤ 3.
Let a be the side length of the regular pentagon whose vertex angle is 108◦ . Tri-
angles ABC and EAB are congruent and thus their base angles are equal to 36◦ .
Therefore ∠EAC = ∠BED = 108◦ −36◦ = 72◦ and thus triangle EAL is isosceles,
with ∠ELA = 72◦ and EL = a. As a result, triangle LED is also isosceles with
base angles equal to 54◦ . Therefore, if M is the midpoint of side AB, the points
M, L, D are collinear and DM is the perpendicular bisector of AB. Similarly, be-
cause ABCDE and ABF KN are congruent, KM is the perpendicular bisector of
AB, and thus the points K, M, L, D are collinear and KM = M D.
Triangles ALB and EAB are similar and thus AB 2 = BL √
· BE or a2 = BL ·
5−1
(BL + a). Solving the quadratic in BL we find BL = a · 2 . From the right
√
triangle BM L we have a = 2 · BL · cos 36◦ , and therefore cos 36◦ = 5+1 4 . Also,
LM = a2 · tan 36◦ , and DL = 2a · cos 54◦ = 2a sin 36◦ . Thus,
√
|LK| |LM | + |DM | |LM | 1 5+1
= =1+2· =1+ = .
|DL| |DL| |DL| 2 cos 36◦ 2
Lemma. Given two lines, ` and m that intersect in a point O, and a second point
P in their plane, define L and M to be the projections of P on ` and m. Then if
P 0 is an arbitrary point on the line isogonal to OP (with respect to ` and m), the
midpoint S of P P 0 is equidistant from L and M .
Proof of the lemma. Because of the right angles at L and M , OP is the diameter
of the circumcircle of triangle OLM . It is known (and easier to prove than to find
in a reference) that the line OP (that joins the vertex O to the circumcenter, call
it O0 ) and the altitude to LM from O are isogonal with respect to the sides OL
and OM ; that is, OP 0 is perpendicular to the side LM . But the line joining O0
(the circumcenter and, therefore, the midpoint of OP ) to S (the midpoint of P P 0 )
is parallel to OP 0 , and therefore is the perpendicular bisector of the chord LM of
the circumcircle. Consequently, S is equidistant from L and M , as claimed.
Proof of the main result. Define P 0 to be the isogonal conjugate of P with respect
to ∆ABC. (That is, the lines joining P and P 0 to any vertex are isogonal with
respect to the angle at that vertex.) The lemma implies that the midpoint of
P P 0 is equidistant from the points U, V , and W , and is thus the circumcenter of
∆U V W . The problem is thereby reduced to proving that EF is the perpendicular
bisector of P P 0 . To that end we define a new triangle X 0 Y 0 Z 0 whose vertices are
the intersections of the perpendicular bisectors of P 0 A, P 0 B, and P 0 C. Because X
is on the perpendicular bisectors of P B and P C, we deduce that X is equidistant
from B, P , and C. Similarly, X 0 is equidistant from those same points. It follows
that X and X 0 are both on the perpendicular bisector of BC, whence O, X, X 0
are collinear.
We now use directed angles to prove that OB is tangent to the circle (BXX 0 ):
1
∠XBO = ∠BXO + ∠XOB = (∠BXC + ∠COB)
2
= ∠BP C + CAB
= ∠P BC + ∠BCP + ∠CBA + ∠ACB
= (∠CBA + ∠P BC) + (∠ACB + ∠BCP )
= ∠P BA + ∠ACP
= ∠CBP 0 + ∠P 0 CB
1
= ∠CP 0 B = ∠CX 0 B
2
= ∠OX 0 B = ∠XX 0 B,
AY + BY + CY ≤ AX + BX + CX.
W Y
P
B C
Z X
Q
AX + BX + CX ≤ AX + BZ + ZX + CX
≤ AZ + BZ + CZ
= 2AZ ≤ 2AQ = 4,
The last inequality follows since AQ is a diameter of the circumcircle. The fact
that BZ + CZ = AZ needs more argument. Let W be located on AZ so that
W Z = BZ. Since ∠AZB = ∠ACB = 60◦ , triangle BW Z is equilateral and
W B = BZ. Since ∠BAW = ∠BCZ and
BZ + CZ = ZW + W A = AZ.
For the minimizing problem, suppose that D lies within the triangle ABC. A 60◦
rotation with centre B takes C to A, A to E and D to F , so that AEBC is a
60◦ −120◦ rhombus. Since BF = BD, triangle BDF is equilateral and BD = F D.
Also AD = EF . Hence
AD + BD + CD = EF + F D + DC ≥ EC.
But CE right bisects AB, and so CE is equal to twice the altitude of triangle
ABC, namely 3. Equality occurs if D coincides with the circumcenter O.
A
E
D
B C
BD + CD ≤ BO + CO = 2,
AD + BD + CD ≤ 2 + 2 = 4.
Now let D lie in the segment bounded by the chord and arc BC, and let AD
intersect the circle again at G. By Ptolemy’s theorem
AB · CG + AC · BG = BC · AG whence CG + BG = AG.
Therefore
AD + BD + CD ≤ AG + BG + CG = 2AG ≤ 4,
with equality if and only if D = G and AG is a diameter.
−−→
For the minimization problem, let x = OX for X = A, B, C, D and corresponding
lower cases. Then
(a − d) · a ≤ ka − dkkak = ka − dk = AD
AD + BD + CD ≥ (a − d) · a + (b − d) · b + (c − d) · c
= 3 − d · (a + b + c)
=3−d·0
= 3,