0% found this document useful (0 votes)
451 views4 pages

Motion To Suspend Proceedings

The accused in a qualified theft case filed a motion to suspend their arraignment. They argue that arraignment should be suspended under the Rules of Criminal Procedure as they intend to appeal the adverse resolution of their case by the provincial prosecutor. They have not yet received a copy of the resolution and plan to avail themselves of the remedy of appeal. They request a suspension of up to 60 days as allowed by the rules to pursue this appeal through the Department of Justice before undergoing the rigors of trial in court.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
451 views4 pages

Motion To Suspend Proceedings

The accused in a qualified theft case filed a motion to suspend their arraignment. They argue that arraignment should be suspended under the Rules of Criminal Procedure as they intend to appeal the adverse resolution of their case by the provincial prosecutor. They have not yet received a copy of the resolution and plan to avail themselves of the remedy of appeal. They request a suspension of up to 60 days as allowed by the rules to pursue this appeal through the Department of Justice before undergoing the rigors of trial in court.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT


11th Judicial Region
Branch 47
Alabel, Sarangani Province

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES


Plaintiff,

FOR:
-VS- QUALIFIED THEFT (ART. 310,
IN RELATION TO ART 319,
R.P.C. AS AMENDED)
VANNY DOMINGO, BETTY
DOMINGO, AND HIPOLITO
BALANAY
Accused.
x-------------------------------------------x

CRIM CASE NO. 03010-22

URGENT MOTION TO SUSPEND ARRAIGNMENT


PURSUANT SECTION 11, PARAGRAPH C, RULE 116,
RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

COMES NOW, accused though undersigned counsel unto this Honorable


Court respectfully submits this motion and avers THAT:

1. Accused are the respondents in the complaint filed before the Office
of the Provincial Prosecutor, Alabel, Sarangani Province docketed as NPS DOC.
NO. XII-07-INV-22G – 00333 for qualified theft, grave coercion, grave threat,
and grave oral defamation;

2. The above-mentioned complaint was resolved against the accused and


the information has been filed with this Honorable Court. But as to date, accused
has not yet received a copy of the adverse resolution from the Office of the
Provincial Prosecutor. But surely, accused, upon receipt of said resolution, would
avail of the remedy provided for under Department Circular No. 70, otherwise
known as the 2000 NPS Rule on Appeal, of the Department of Justice, as modified
by Department Circular No. 027;

3. Section 1 of the said Rule on Appeal, states:

Page 1 of 4
Motion to Suspend Arraignment
“SECTION 1. Scope. - This Rule shall apply to appeals from
resolutions of the Chief State Prosecutor, Regional State
Prosecutors and Provincial/City Prosecutors in cases subject of
preliminary investigation/ reinvestigation.”

4. Moreover, accused respectfully manifest that they are bent on


exhausting the remedy available in the ordinary course of law in order to defend
themselves without going through the rigorous trial in court. As such, they will
appeal the adverse resolution in accordance with Section 2, Department Circular
No. 70, otherwise known as 2000 NPS Rule on Appeal, which states:

“SECTION 2. Where to appeal. An appeal may be brought to the


Secretary of Justice within the period and in the manner herein
provided.”

5. Furthermore, in view of the foregoing, accused humbly request for the


suspension of arraignment as warranted under the Rules on Criminal. Section
11(c), Rule 116, thereof provides:

“SEC. 11. Suspension of Arraignment. – Upon motion by the party,


the arraignment shall be suspended in the following cases:

xxxx.
(c) A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is
pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the
President; Provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed
sixty (60) days counted from the filing of the petition with the
reviewing office.”

WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed that


arraignment in the instant criminal case be SUSPENDED pursuant to Section
11(c), Rule 116, of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.

FURTHER, the accused respectfully prays for such and other reliefs as may
deem just and equitable under the premises.

10 October 2022, General Santos City for Sarangani Province.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

CLEMENTE A. PANGANDUYON
Counsel for the Petitioner
Page 2 of 4
Motion to Suspend Arraignment
Roll No. 72479/14June2019/MM
MCLE Compliance No.: VII-0014243
IBP No. 183475/03Jan2022
PTR No. 0032295/03Jan2022

3rd Floor, C. CZAR & Co. Building,


(beside Eastwest Bank), Santiago Blvd.,
General Santos City
Cell. No. 09153560224
clementepanganduyon@gmail.com

NOTICE OF HEARING

The Receiving Clerk


Municipal Circuit Trial Court
Glan-Malapatan

Office of the Provincial Prosecutor


Alabel, Sarangani Province

Sir/Madam:

Greetings! We shall present the foregoing motion to the Court on 21 October


2022 or at any available time of this court’s calendar. The adverse parties are
SERVED copies of this pleading. Thank you.

CLEMENTE A. PANGANDUYON

Copy furnished:

ENREQUE B. YAP, JR.


Private Complainant
Poblacion, Glan, Sarangani Province

Registry Receipt No.: _______________


Date: ____________________________

Page 3 of 4
Motion to Suspend Arraignment
THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR
Office of the Provincial Prosecutor
Alabel, Sarangani Province
(Personal Service)

EXPLANATION
(in accordance with Section 7 of Rule 13 of
the 1997 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure)

The foregoing Motion is being served on the via registered mail, personal
service not being practicable, due to distance and the lack of personnel to effect
personal service.

                                                                                 
                                                          CLEMENTE A. PANGANDUYON

Page 4 of 4
Motion to Suspend Arraignment

You might also like