0% found this document useful (0 votes)
145 views1 page

ERP Supplier Comparison

Infor has over 20 brands with diverse functionality and is heavily maintenance and AS/400 revenue based. SAP has two brands with the deepest functionality and the wide lead in ERP market share. Oracle has four primary brands, two with deep functionality and is gaining on SAP in North America but still behind SAP in overall ERP market share.

Uploaded by

Wissam Abu-Taha
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
145 views1 page

ERP Supplier Comparison

Infor has over 20 brands with diverse functionality and is heavily maintenance and AS/400 revenue based. SAP has two brands with the deepest functionality and the wide lead in ERP market share. Oracle has four primary brands, two with deep functionality and is gaining on SAP in North America but still behind SAP in overall ERP market share.

Uploaded by

Wissam Abu-Taha
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ERP Supplier Comparison, 2009

The following 2009 ERP Supplier Comparison was prepared by IT Business Edge contributor Dennis Byron. This was originally published on December 31, 2008.
Infor Over 20 brands with widely diverse functionality With its many brands, probably third largest but heavily maintenancerevenue- and AS/400-based Microsoft Four basic brands; all but AX with basic functionality Oracle Four primary brands, two with deep functionality Gaining on SAP, especially in North America, but still significantly behind SAP in ERP market share Large lead over SAP in standalone applications market share, primarily through acquisition About 4500 middleware partnerships that should be transferable to applications SAP Two brands, one with the deepest functionality available Holds wide lead in ERP market share (SAP is also gaining in middleware behind IBM, Microsoft and Oracle) Other

ERP Functionality

LawsonTwo SageMultiple IntuitOne

Market penetration/ activity, ERP

Would rank somewhere between Infor and Lawson

Sage and Intuit in particular have many more installations than Infor, Microsoft, Oracle and SAP but are aimed totally at small- and medium-size enterprises

Market penetration/ activity, standalone

Also has a widely diverse mix of standalone application brands

Leads based on Office; also actively pushing CRM capability as a service; will use the experience to market ERP as a service Partners heavily with Microsoft developer community; looking for 100,000

SAP does not really compete in standalone Thousands of examples applications market but has a few offerings

ERP Partnership strategy

Partners heavily with IBM and IBM distributors

Has been trying unsuccessfully for 10 years to build a program; looking for over 1,000 Integrated industry centricity of its ERP offering in 25 major codes is key to SAP success in ERP Solid modern middleware base for both brands Will take another run at NetWeaverbased SaaS, probably under the BusinessOne brand (given the failure of the Business By Demand service).

Tend to partner with IBM and Microsoft (but rarely both); many newer ERP suppliers partner within open source community Thousands of examples from companies such as Agresso, Compiere, HotWax, IFS, OpenBravo and XTuple mentioned in accompanying articles Primarily use IBM or Microsoft middleware or LAMP/WAMP stack

ERP Industry applications strategy

A lot of Covers breadth of Wide span but standalone, the industry primarily product unintegrated classification supply chain industry-centric codes point products Heavily AS/400based Different platform under each brand Not a major market goal of Oracles according to public statements; may be counting on NetSuite off the books

ERP Platform

.NET

ERP/SaaS Strategy

Trying to build Through partners into major delivery method

Others have shied away from direct SaaS, most notably Lawson (whose CEO was not shy about it)

You might also like