Scribd
Upload
355 views1 page

Thesis Evaluation Criteria

This report evaluates a student's graduation project at the University of Jordan's Faculty of Engineering, Department of Architecture. The project is assessed based on 7 criteria: the design brief and problem definition; the philosophical concept; the relationship between the project, site, and context; the proposed components and identity; design standards and criteria fulfillment; graphic and presentation quality; and the oral presentation. For each criterion, the evaluator indicates whether the component was clear and good, acceptable, needing development, or weak. The evaluator signs and dates the report.

Uploaded by

Nancy Al-Assaf
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
355 views1 page

Thesis Evaluation Criteria

This report evaluates a student's graduation project at the University of Jordan's Faculty of Engineering, Department of Architecture. The project is assessed based on 7 criteria: the design brief and problem definition; the philosophical concept; the relationship between the project, site, and context; the proposed components and identity; design standards and criteria fulfillment; graphic and presentation quality; and the oral presentation. For each criterion, the evaluator indicates whether the component was clear and good, acceptable, needing development, or weak. The evaluator signs and dates the report.

Uploaded by

Nancy Al-Assaf
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

University of Jordan

Faculty of engineering /Department of architecture


First semester, academic year 2018/2019
Graduation Project II – Final phase
Student Name: Name St.ID :
Name St.ID :
Project Title
Abstract:

Project Assessment Report (For NAAB Accreditation Purposes)


Comments:

Please indicate your evaluation by making the appropriate box


No. Item 1 2 3 4 Comments
1 Design brief: The problem definition, the
need for the project &its objectives Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development
2 Philosophy : The theoretical and
philosophical aspects of the concept Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development

3 Project &context: The relationship among


the project, the site and the context Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development
4 Project Components: The proposed
components reflected the project identity Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development
5 Design standards and criteria: The drawings
fulfil the requirements of the project type Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development
6 Graphics and presentation: the drawings
quality and the graphics Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development
7 The oral presentation: The oral student’s
presentation of work Clear & Acceptable Needing Weak
Good development

Juror Name: Signature: Date:

You might also like