BOLD MEDICINE:
Clinical Global
Impression (CGI)
Scales
CGI SCALES:
Clinically Assessing an Individual’s Global Functioning
Since the 1970s, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales have been used in
clinical studies to provide objective clinical impressions of a single individual
that transcend mere symptom checklists.
The scales track clinical progress across time, taking into account all available information:
• Patient’s history • Symptoms
• Caregiver input • Behavior
• Psychosocial circumstances • Impact of the symptoms on the patient’s ability to function
CGI scales have been shown to correlate with other, longer rating clinical measurement tools across a wide range of neurologic
and psychiatric diagnoses. It has been used to support drug regulatory approvals for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and ADHD
treatments.
Tracking Improvement Over Time with the Two CGI Scales
The methodology includes two companion one-item measures evaluating the following:
CGI-SEVERITY (CGI-S) CGI-IMPROVEMENT (CGI-I)
An objective measure of condition severity at the start of the An objective measure of a single patient’s change
trial, establishes a baseline for each patient (improvement or worsening) compared to baseline
Clinicians ask: “Considering your total clinical experience with Clinicians ask: “Compared to the patient’s condition at
this particular population, how ill is the patient at this time?” baseline, this patient’s [average] condition has…?”
Answers fall on the following seven-point scale: Answers fall on the following seven-point scale:
Normal, not at The most Very much Very much
all impaired severely impaired improved worse
What CGI Scores Mean
The two CGI scales help track changes that are relevant to each individual patient.
While the CGI-I score generally tracks with the CGI-S—in that
For the CGI-I scale specifically,
improvement in one follows improvement in the other—the
±.05
a change of 0.5 indicates a
clinical impact of significance two CGI scores can occasionally be dissociated. A clinician
that will influence a physician’s may notice changes in the CGI-I relative to baseline, despite
treatment decisions.
no recent change in the overall CGI-S score, or vice versa.
A Brief Guide to Administering CGI Scales
The general administration guidelines for CGI scales have evolved over the years, but some of the more commonly
used research conventions include:
The Administrator
In clinical research, the CGI is administered by an experienced clinician who is familiar with the disease under study
and the likely progression of treatment—who can make an expert clinical global judgment about illness severity
across time and within the context of that clinical experience.
The Assessment
The clinician makes a judgment about the total picture of the patient at each visit: the illness severity, the patient’s
level of distress and other aspects of impairment, and the impact of the illness on functioning. The CGI is rated
without regard to the clinician’s belief that any clinical changes are or are not due to medication and without
consideration of the etiology of the symptoms.
The Timeframe
The CGI is usually rated relative to the past seven days (including the day of the visit up to and through the visit). In
this respect, the CGI is a state-dependent measure summarizing one week rather than a lifetime of symptoms and
behavior.
The Sources of Information
Make use of all information available—a clinical patient interview should be combined with any other information
available for the time period under study, from such sources as chart notes, family members, caseworkers, unit
nurses, schoolteachers for children, or significant others.
The Questions to Ask
Establish the presence of relevant symptoms, the frequency of their occurrence over the seven-day rating
timeframe, the intensity or severity of the symptoms, and the effect of the symptoms on functioning in major areas
of the patient’s life: work, home, school, and relationships.