100% found this document useful (2 votes)
1K views2 pages

Panel Discussion Evaluation Form

This document contains an evaluation format for a panel discussion held at the College of Nursing, Madras Medical College in Chennai, India. The format collects student and moderator feedback on a 5-point scale regarding whether the panel enhanced knowledge, met learning objectives, and presented relevant information. It also includes space for comments on panelists' subject knowledge and presentation skills, as well as suggestions for future program topics.

Uploaded by

SarithaRajesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
1K views2 pages

Panel Discussion Evaluation Form

This document contains an evaluation format for a panel discussion held at the College of Nursing, Madras Medical College in Chennai, India. The format collects student and moderator feedback on a 5-point scale regarding whether the panel enhanced knowledge, met learning objectives, and presented relevant information. It also includes space for comments on panelists' subject knowledge and presentation skills, as well as suggestions for future program topics.

Uploaded by

SarithaRajesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

COLLEGE OF NURSING, MADRAS MEDICAL COLLEGE, CHENNAI-03

EVALUATION FORMAT FOR PANEL DISCUSSION

Title: Date:

Strongly Strongly
Student name : Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Disagree

Course :
1.This panel enhanced the professional knowledge and skills.

2. This panel met its stated learning objectives.

3. The information presented was relevant, timely and up-to-date. 

4. There was adequate opportunity for questions and interactions.

5. Overall, this panel was a strong education experience.  

Moderator
Strongly Strongly
Name: ______________________________ Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Disagree

6a. This moderator… Was knowledgeable of subject.

Presented the content well.


Panelist #1

Name: ______________________________

6b. This instructor…                             Was knowledgeable of subject.

Presented the content well.


Panelist #2

Name: ______________________________

6c. This instructor… Was knowledgeable of subject. 

Presented the content well.


Panelist #3

Name: ______________________________

6d. This instructor… Was knowledgeable of subject. 

Presented the content well.

 
Panelist #4

Name: ______________________________

6e. This instructor… Was knowledgeable of subject. 

Presented the content well.

Total Marks Obtained:


________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Signature
8. of the
What topics Evaluator:
should be considered for future programs?

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

You might also like