0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views3 pages

Slope Performance

The document discusses slope monitoring methods used at a mining site, including survey prisms, inclinometers, and ground movement radar. Survey prisms are read automatically every six hours and show long-term movement rates of 0.02-0.03 mm/day in some areas and up to 0.2 mm/day in other areas closer to the mining activity. Inclinometers also show movement correlated with rainfall and mining rates. Ground movement radar provides high frequency monitoring and identified ongoing movement in the area of a previous slope failure.

Uploaded by

Agung k
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views3 pages

Slope Performance

The document discusses slope monitoring methods used at a mining site, including survey prisms, inclinometers, and ground movement radar. Survey prisms are read automatically every six hours and show long-term movement rates of 0.02-0.03 mm/day in some areas and up to 0.2 mm/day in other areas closer to the mining activity. Inclinometers also show movement correlated with rainfall and mining rates. Ground movement radar provides high frequency monitoring and identified ongoing movement in the area of a previous slope failure.

Uploaded by

Agung k
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Slope Performance

Monitoring

In addition to monitoring by visual inspections, comprehensive displacement monitoring has

been implemented using survey prisms and inclinometers. Currently, during extraction of the

buttresses and the mining of the lower benches, ground movement radar (Slope Stability Radar -

SSR) has also been employed.

Survey Prism Monitoring

The current PB8S prism monitoring network consists of prisms read automatically

approximately every six hours. Data are fed back to the geotechnical engineering and pit control

offices by telemetry. Slope displacement monitoring shows movement over much of PB8S and

significant effort has been made to determine the mechanisms causing this movement and the

consequent risks.

Displacement records for these prisms are presented in Figure 3.4 and show the following:

 Long term movement rates of 0.02 mm/day on the upper slope (prisms 111022 and

114013).

 Long term movement rates of 0.03 mm/day in the centre of the slope through a keel

structure (prism 117023).

 Short term movement rates of between approximately 0.1 mm/day and 0.2 mm/day on

the lower benches of the slope in closer proximity to the EFF (prisms 122019 and

124005).

 All movement rates have slowed as the rate of mining in the lower benches has slowed.
 Some correlation between rainfall events and periods of increased movement,

particularly where relatively shallow, smaller scale, instability mechanisms develop

lower in the slope in proximity to the EFF.

Displacement rates of 0.2 mm/day were recorded over the five months prior to the adjacent

instability which was triggered by 82 mm of rain fall. Displacement rates of 2.2 mm/day were

recorded at the time of collapse. Regarding mechanisms causing movement, the measured

ground displacements and the time and rate of movement over the majority of the slope are

compatible with the initial response of a rock mass to excavation (that is elastic rebound,

relaxation and dilation of the rock mass) for large open pits (Zavodni, 2000). However,

monitoring results prior to the Feb 13 slip indicate that, where multi-batter scale instability is

controlled by weak planar structures, displacement rates similar to those expected as an initial

response to mining may result in slope collapse. Total displacements of only 40 mm were

recorded prior to the Feb 13 slip. instability likely to cause movement in that particular sector of

the slope. Daily, weekly and quarterly monitoring reviews are performed, based on an

assessment of movement of prisms within these groups

Inclinometers

A total of seven inclinometers have been installed to various depths on PB8S, and are principally

designed to monitor displacement on the 320 Faults and the major keel structures as well as the

EFF. Inclinometers are manually read once every week or two, depending on previous

movements and location on the slope. Movement has been recorded on all but one of the

instruments, with the greatest movement being recorded in holes which intersect the EFF in the
central area of the PB8S. These movements show a strong correlation with large rainfall events

and mining rates.

Slope Stability Radar (SSR)

During mining of the lower benches of PB8S, Slope Stability Radar (SSR) has been employed to

provide additional monitoring of the safety hazard associated with possible bench to multi bench

instability triggered by mining or rainfall. The principal advantages of the radar over prism

monitoring are its coverage of the complete area of slope being monitored and shorter intervals

between scans (15 minutes versus six hours). To date, the radar monitoring results have

identified ongoing movement only in the area of the Feb. 13 slip. The SSR is operated in a safety

critical mode. That is, critical displacement levels are set, at which movement alarms will be

triggered in the pit control and geotechnical offices. In practice, alarm trigger levels have been

set after consideration of the type and size of failure expected and the need to prevent numerous

false alarms due to atmospheric interference.

You might also like