Immunological Disorders & Therapy
Immunological Disorders & Therapy
5.1 Introduction
The human immune system is a defense organization within the body that protects against
diseases. The immune system basically consists of several cells that identify and kill the
invading pathogens and tumor cells. The immune system detects a wide variety of agents
such as bacteria, viruses, and parasitic worms. The term “immunity” was first used during
430 bc and later on, in the eighteenth century, research experiments were conducted with
scorpion venom that showed that certain dogs and mice are immune to scorpion venom.
Various theories have been hypothesized to show that the human body has an intrin-
sic defense against disease and not until 1891 was it revealed that microorganisms are
responsible for various infectious diseases. Besides bacteria, viruses were also established
as human pathogens in 1901, with the discovery of the yellow fever virus. One of the major
tasks of the immune system is to defend the body from any kind of harmful infections.
It has been shown that disease detection is complicated, as pathogens can evolve rapidly
and with time can produce a completely new organism to avoid the immune defense sys-
tem, which allows pathogens to successfully infect hosts. It has been reported that many
organisms (bacteria and viruses) have evolved that cause severe health problems around
the world.
109
110 Biotechnology in medical sciences
Cellular Humoral
Acquired immunity
Immunity
Innate immunity
Cellular Humoral
convene long-lasting or protective immunity to the host (Figure 5.1). It has been reported
that innate immune systems offer immediate defense against infection and are found in
all plants and animals. It has been found that the innate immune system generally consists
of three components—membrane barrier, inflammation, and complement system—to pro-
tect the cells from infections. In case a pathogen breaks these barriers, the innate immune
system provides an immediate response to control pathogen entry. In case pathogens can
successfully evade the innate response, a host body possesses another layer of protection
called the adaptive immune system, which can be activated by the innate response. At
this point, the immune system familiarizes its response during an infection to increase its
recognition of the pathogen. This enhanced response against pathogens is then remem-
bered in the form of an immunological memory after the pathogen has been removed, and
allows the adaptive immune system to withstand faster and stronger attacks each time
this pathogen is detected (Figures 5.2 and 5.3).
Neutrophil
T cell
Immune disease
prostaglandins also sensitize pain receptors that cause a vasodilation of blood vessels at
the location and employ phagocytes, especially neutrophils. These neutrophils then trig-
ger other parts of the immune system to attack the pathogenic infections. Inflammation
leads to the development of various symptoms that include redness of the skin, heat, swell-
ing of the organ, pain in the body or parts of the body, and possible dysfunction of the
organs or tissues involved. In addition to this, the complement system is a biochemical
cascade of the immune system that helps to clear pathogens in the body. The cascade is
basically composed of plasma proteins that are synthesized in the liver, mainly by hepato-
cytes. These proteins work together to trigger the recruitment of inflammatory cells of the
immune system to upset the plasma membrane of an infected cell, resulting in the death
of the pathogens.
that leukocytes are able to move freely in the body and network with cellular debris, for-
eign particles, and invading pathogenic microorganisms. Interestingly, most innate leuko-
cytes cannot multiply or reproduce on their own, unlike other body cells. These leukocytes
are the products of hematopoietic stem cells present in the bone marrow and we briefly
describe the various types of innate leukocytes.
5.3.2.2 Phagocytes
Phagocytes are basically immune cells that engulf pathogens or particles to protect the
body from any infection. It has been reported that phagocytes engulf a particle or patho-
gen by extending parts of its plasma membrane and wrapping the membrane around the
particle until it is completely enveloped and covered. Once the pathogen is completely
covered, the lysosome, which contains enzymes and acids, starts killing and digesting the
foreign particle or organism. It has been described that phagocytes generally patrol the
human body searching for pathogens, and are also able to respond to molecular signals
produced by other cells, which are called cytokines. There are various types of phagocytic
cells reported in the human immune system that include neutrophils, macrophages, and
dendritic cells as described in the following sections (Figure 5.5).
5.3.2.3 Macrophages
Macrophages are large leukocytes that are able to move outside the vascular system and
enter the areas between cells in the hunt of invading pathogens. It has been reported
Mast cell
Muscle cells Nerve cells Endothelial cells Hematopoietic cells Epithelial cells
Figure 5.4 Mast cells and their role in innate and acquired immunity.
Chapter five: Immunological disorders and immunotherapy 113
that these macrophages are the most efficient phagocytes, and can kill large numbers of
bacteria or other cells or microorganisms. The attachment of anti-bacterial molecules to
receptors of a macrophage terminates the bacterial population through respiratory spurt,
causing the release of reactive oxygen species. It has been reported that pathogens can also
stimulate the macrophage to produce chemokines, which command other cells to the site
of infection.
5.3.2.4 Neutrophils
Because of the presence of granules in their cytoplasm, neutrophils, eosinophils, and baso-
phils are known as granulocytes. Neutrophils are also known as polymorphonuclear cells
(PMNs) due to their typical lobed nuclei. It has been reported that neutrophil granules
contain a variety of toxic elements that destroy or inhibit the growth of bacteria and fungi.
Like macrophages, neutrophils attack pathogens by activating a respiratory spurt that
contains oxidizing agents, including free oxygen radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and hypo-
chlorite. It has been reported that neutrophils are the most plentiful type of phagocyte,
normally representing 50–60% of the total mobile leukocytes, and they are usually the first
type of cells to reach the site of an infection. It has been estimated that the bone marrow
of a healthy adult human being produces more than 100 billion neutrophils per day, and
produces more than 10 times more neutrophils during acute inflammation or infection.
Epithelial wall
Antigen
Migration and maturation
Immature
dendrite cell
Dendritic
precursor Mature
B cell dendritic cell
B
B
B
T
T Dendrite cell
T cell apoptosis
T Lymphocyte
T Lymphoid
activation organ T
cells are very vital in antigen performance and assist as a link between the innate and
adaptive immune defense system (Figure 5.6).
KIR MHC-I
SHP-1
Target
NK + MHC
Class I
LYSIS
KIR
NK + Target
LYSIS
Figure 5.7 NK cell: The major histocompatibility (MHC) Class-I (MHC-I) molecules are normally
expressed on the surface of virtually all cells of the body. Most pathogens do not display the MHC-I
marker, and as a result, are easily identified by a killer cell.
Receptor
A: Cancer specific antibody binds the B: Natural killer cells bind cancer specific antibody which
receptors located on the cancer cells attached to receptors located on the cancer cells and lead
to kill destruction of tumor cells
5.3.3.1 Lymphocytes
The lymphocytes belong to the adaptive immune system. There are two different types
of lymphocytes, B cells and T cells. These cells are generally derived from hematopoi-
etic stem cells in the bone marrow. Moreover, B cells take part in the humoral immune
response, while T cells are mainly involved in cell-mediated immune response. Both B
and T cells contain receptor molecules that distinguish specific targets. For example, T
cells recognize a pathogen only after antigens are processed and presented in combination
116 Biotechnology in medical sciences
with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule. There are two major subtypes of
T cells—killer T cells and helper T cells. Killer T cells can only identify antigens coupled
to Class-I MHC molecules, while helper T cells only identify antigens coupled to Class-II
MHC molecules. A third, minor subtype is the gamma–delta T cells that distinguish inte-
gral host antigens that are not attached to MHC receptors.
Macrophage
Antigen
fragment
Class II MHC
molecule
5.4.1 Immunodeficiency
Immunodeficiency is a physiological condition where the immune system’s capacity to
fight infectious disease has become dysfunctional or entirely absent. In most cases, immu-
nodeficiencies are acquired diseases, but some people are born with defects in the immune
system, which is known as a primary immunodeficiency. It has been reported that a per-
son who has an immunodeficiency of any kind is considered to be immune-compromised
and such a person may be particularly vulnerable to opportunistic infections, in addition
to normal infections that could affect everyone.
5.5 Autoimmunity
In a healthy person, immunity generally protects the person from all infectious diseases,
but in some individuals, it works against itself and destroys the person’s immune system.
This condition is generally known as an autoimmune disease. It has been suggested that
any disease fallouts from such an abnormal immune response are called an autoimmune
disease. Autoimmunity is frequently caused by a deficiency of germ cell development that
results in the development of a condition where body cells work against their own cells
and tissues. There are several examples of autoimmunity disease such as celiac disease,
Churg–Strauss syndrome, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, Graves’ disease, idiopathic thrombo-
cytopenic purpura, diabetes mellitus type 1, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s syn-
drome, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Chapter five: Immunological disorders and immunotherapy 119
5.7.1.1 Causes
There are various causes for the development of type 1 diabetes and one of the factors is
both genetic and environmental. It has been suggested that for identical twins, when one
twin can have type 1 diabetes, the other twin will only have type 1 diabetes 30–50% of the
time. Even with having exactly the same genome, one twin will have the disease, whereas
the other twin does not; this suggests that environmental factors, in addition to genetic
factors, can influence disease prevalence. It has been further shown that type 1 diabe-
tes is a polygenic disease, meaning many different genes contribute to its expression and
depending on the locus or the combination of loci on the chromosome, it can be dominant,
recessive, or somewhere in between. Moreover, the strongest gene, IDDM1 is situated in
the MHC Class-II region on chromosome 6, at the staining region 6p21.
5.7.1.2 Pathophysiology
Type 1 diabetes is not fully understood. In type 1 diabetes, the pancreatic β-cells produce
insulin hormones in the islet of Langerhans. Type 1 diabetes (Figure 5.10) was previously
Chapter five: Immunological disorders and immunotherapy 121
Glucose
Diminished
insulin
Insulin
receptor Glut-4
Figure 5.10 Type 1 diabetes is caused by a loss or malfunction of the insulin- producing cells, called
pancreatic β-cells. Damage to β-cells results in an absence or insufficient production of insulin by
the body. Most cases of type 1 diabetes have an autoimmune basis, and the immune system mistak-
enly attacks and destroys β-cells. Since insulin is necessary to sustain life, the missing insulin has
to be replaced. The replacement insulin is administered by injection using a syringe or an insulin
pump, which delivers the insulin under the skin.
known as juvenile diabetes because it is one of the most frequent chronic diseases in chil-
dren; however, the majority of new-onset type 1 diabetes is observed in adults. It has been
suggested that the use of antibody testing (such as glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies,
islet cell antibodies, and insulinoma-associated autoantibodies) are used to distinguish
between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (Figure 5.11).
5.7.1.3 Diagnosis
One of the best approaches toward treating type 1 diabetes is first to confirm the nature
of the disease by diagnostic tools. Type 1 diabetes is checked by analyzing the plasma
glucose level and is diagnosed by fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL (con-
sidered as prediabetic conditions) and plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL (considered
as diabetic condition). It has been suggested that the diagnosis of other types of diabetes is
made in other ways that include ordinary health checkups, investigation of hyperglycemia
during other medical investigations, and secondary symptoms such as vision changes or
unexplainable fatigue. Diabetes is often detected when a person suffers a problem that
is frequently caused by diabetes, such as a heart attack, stroke, neuropathy, poor wound
healing, certain eye problems, certain fungal infections, foot ulcers, or delivering a baby
with hypoglycemia.
To confirm type 1 diabetes, most physicians prefer to measure a fasting glucose
level and according to the current definition, two fasting glucose measurements above
126 mg/dL are considered diagnostic for diabetes mellitus. Moreover, patients with fast-
ing glucose levels from 100 to 125 mg/dL are considered to have impaired fasting glu-
cose. Furthermore, patients with plasma glucose at or above 140 mg/dL but not over
122 Biotechnology in medical sciences
Glucose
Insulin
Insulin
receptor Glut-4
Defect in signaling
to glut-4 Glucose
transporters
Figure 5.11 With type 2 diabetes, the pancreas still produces at least some insulin. But the cells are
ignoring insulin’s request for glucose transporters. For a time, the β-cells respond to this cellular
insubordination by pumping out more and more insulin. But eventually, the β-cells get fed up with
the overtime and quit overproducing insulin.
200 mg/dL, 2 h after a 75 g oral glucose load are considered to have impaired glucose
tolerance. Interestingly, among these two prediabetic states, the latter in particular is a
major risk factor for progression to full-blown diabetes mellitus as well as cardiovascu-
lar disease.
5.7.1.4 Management
One of the best practices to treat diabetic patients is control the blood insulin and glucose
level all the time. There are various treatment procedures available to manage diabetes.
Patients with type 1 diabetes are normally treated with insulin replacement therapy either
via subcutaneous injection or insulin pump, along with dietary management such as car-
bohydrate tracking, and careful monitoring of blood glucose levels using glucose meters.
Today, the most common insulin is the biosynthetically designed insulin that is synthe-
sized by using recombinant DNA technology. There are major global manufacturers of
insulin such as Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi-Aventis, who make and
sell insulin injections worldwide.
Donor
Recipient
Bowel
Transplanted
duodenum Transplanted kidney
Transplanted pancreas
Transplanted ureter
Bladder
Recipient
Donor
Liver
Isolation of
Pancreas
beta islet cells
Injection of beta islet cells
into patient’s pancreas
Myasthenia gravis
Normal
IgG antibodies
Muscle
Muscle
Na+
Neuron
Na+ Endosome
Neuron
Na+
ACh
Figure 5.14 This disease is caused by the production of IgG antibodies (antiacetylcholine recep-
tor antibodies) that attack the acetylcholine receptors of skeletal muscles. These antibodies cause
a decrease in the amount of acetylcholine receptors and ultimately decrease the action potential
achieved with stimulation.
5.7.2.1 Symptoms
One of the main symptoms of MG is that muscles become gradually weaker during periods
of activity and can improve after periods of rest. It has been shown that the muscles that
control the eyes and face are especially vulnerable to this disease. The muscles that control
the breathing function and neck and limb movements can also be affected. Interestingly,
the beginning of the disorder can be unexpected and symptoms are sporadic. The diag-
nosis of MG may be delayed if the symptoms are variable. In most cases, the first visible
symptom is weakness of the eye muscles; in others, difficulty in swallowing and inaudible
speech or sound may be the first clinical signs. The amount of muscle weakness involved
in MG varies among patients; extending from the eye muscles to the muscles that con-
trol breathing are affected. There are various pathological symptoms that include double
vision due to weakness of the muscles, an unstable or toddling gait, and weakness on the
hands. Also, in MG disease, a paralysis of the respiratory muscles can occur that requires
immediate medical intervention in the form of ventilation to sustain life.
5.7.2.2 Treatment
Myasthenia can be treated either by medication or by surgery. It has been reported that the
medication for myasthenia consists of cholinesterase inhibitors, as these drugs can improve
muscle function. The use of immunosuppressant drugs can also reduce the autoimmune
process. The drugs, namely, neostigmine and acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors: neostigmine
126 Biotechnology in medical sciences
and pyridostigmine, can improve muscle function by slowing the natural enzyme cholin-
esterase that degrades acetylcholine. In a common practice, physicians or doctors can start
the treatment with a low dose of pyridostigmine that can be increased until the anticipated
result is achieved. It has been suggested that pyridostigmine is a short-lived drug with
a half-life of about 4 h. There are a few immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine,
mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and azathioprine, which can also be used for this con-
dition. It is a common practice for patients to be treated with a combination of drugs with
cholinesterase inhibitors. It has been found that treatments with some immunosuppres-
sive drugs take weeks to months before the effects are observed. Moreover, in serious
conditions, the drug plasmapheresis can be used to eliminate the putative antibody from
the blood circulation. Also, intravenous injection of immunoglobulins can be used to bind
the circulating antibodies. Interestingly, both these treatments have comparatively short
benefits. In case, drug therapy fails to control the myasthenia condition, then this problem
is tackle by the surgical removal of the thymus, although the surgical process is more con-
troversial in patients who do not show thymus abnormalities.
5.8 Summary
The human immune system is a defense system against diseases and infections. The
immune system basically consists of several cells that identify and kill the invading patho-
gens and tumor cells. The immune system detects a wide variety of agents such as bac-
teria, viruses, and parasitic worms. One of the major functions of the immune system is
to defend the human body from any kind of harmful infections and provide immunity.
There are various treatments of immunological disorders, such as antibiotics and vaccines.
Monoclonal antibodies are also being used on a regular basis to treat autoimmune con-
ditions (multiple sclerosis) where body cells actually attack and kill their own cells. In
multiple sclerosis, the immune system becomes dysfunctional and starts killing the body’s
own healthy cells. In this chapter, we have discussed the immune system, its components,
immunological disorders, and its treatment strategies.
Further reading
Baets MH and Oosterhuis HJGH 1993. Myasthenia Gravis. United Kingdom: DRD Press, pp. 158. ISBN
3805547366.
Baulcombe D 2004. RNA silencing in plants. Nature 431 (7006): 356–363. doi:10.1038/nature02874.
PMID 15372043.
Bedlack RS and Sanders DB 2000. How to handle myasthenic crisis. Essential steps in patient care.
Postgrad Med 107 (4): 211–214, 220–222. PMID 10778421.
Bruce A, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, and Walters P 2002. Molecular Biology of the Cell (4th
ed.) New York and London: Garland Science. ISBN 0-8153-3218-1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/books/bv.fcgi?call=bv.View..ShowTOC&rid=mboc4.TOC&depth=2.
Calhoun RF, Ritter JH, Guthrie TJ et al. 1999. Results of transcervical thymectomy for myasthenia
gravis in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 230 (4): 555–561. doi:10.1097/00000658-199910000-
00011. PMID 10522725.
Carroccio A, Brusca I, Iacono G et al. 2007. IgA anti-actin antibodies ELISA in coeliac disease: A mul-
ticentre study. Dig Liver Dis 39: 814. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2007.06.004. PMID 17652043.
Conti-Fine BM, Milani M, and Kaminski HJ 2006. Myasthenia gravis: Past, present, and future. J Clin
Invest 116 (11): 2843–2854. doi:10.1172/JCI29894. PMID 17080188.
de Kraker M, Kluin J, Renken N, Maat AP, and Bogers AJ 2005. CT and myasthenia gravis: Correlation
between mediastinal imaging and histopathological findings. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 4
(3): 267–271. doi:10.1510/icvts.2004.097246. PMID 17670406.
Dittrich AM, Erbacher A, Specht S et al. 2008. Helminth infection with Litomosoides sigmodontis
induces regulatory T cells and inhibits allergic sensitization, airway inflammation, and hyper-
reactivity in a murine asthma model. J Immunol 180 (3): 1792–1799. PMID 18209076.
Dunne DW and Cooke A 2005. A worm’s eye view of the immune system: Consequences for evo-
lution of human autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol 5 (5): 420–426. doi:10.1038/nri1601.
PMID 15864275.
Edwards JC and Cambridge G 2006. B-cell targeting in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune
diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 6 (5): 394–403. doi:10.1038/nri1838. PMID 16622478.
Edwards JC, Cambridge G, and Abrahams VM 1999. Do self perpetuating B lymphocytes drive
human autoimmune disease? Immunology 97: 1868–1876.
Finlay B and Falkow S 1997. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol
Rev 61 (2): 136–169. PMID 9184008. PMC 232605. http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/reprint/61/2/136.
pdf.
Chapter five: Immunological disorders and immunotherapy 129
Finlay B and McFadden G 2006. Anti-immunology: Evasion of the host immune system by bacterial
and viral pathogens. Cell 124 (4): 767–782. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.034. PMID 16497587.
Itoh S, Ichida T, Yoshida T et al. 1998. Autoantibodies against a 210 kDa glycoprotein of the nuclear
pore complex as a prognostic marker in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol
Hepatol 13 (3): 257–265. PMID 9570238.
Jaretzki A, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM et al. 2000. Myasthenia gravis: Recommendations for clinical
research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia
Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology 55 (1): 16–23. PMID 10891897. http://www.neurol-
ogy.org/cgi/content/full/55/1/16.
Jerne N 1974. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann Immunol (Paris) 125C (1–2):
373–389. PMID 4142565.
Juel VC 2004. Myasthenia gravis: Management of myasthenic crisis and perioperative care. Semin
Neurol 24 (1): 75–81. doi:10.1055/s-2004-829595. PMID 15229794.
Kerkar N, Ma Y, Davies ET, Cheeseman P, Mieli-Vergani G, and Vergani D 2002. Detection of liver
kidney microsomal type 1 antibody using molecularly based immunoassays. J Clin Pathol
55 (12): 906–909. PMID 12461054. http://jcp.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&p
mid=12461054.
Kobayashi H 2005. Airway biofilms: Implications for pathogenesis and therapy of respiratory tract
infections. Treat Respir Med 4 (4): 241–253. doi:10.2165/00151829-200504040-00003. PMID
16086598.
Kubach J, Becker C, Schmitt E, Steinbrink K, Huter E, Tuettenberg A, and Jonuleit H 2005. Dendritic
cells: Sentinels of immunity and tolerance. Int J Hematol 81 (3): 197–203. doi:10.1532/IJH97.04165.
PMID 15814330.
Leite MI, Jacob S, Viegas S et al. 2008. IgG1 antibodies to acetylcholine receptors in “seronegative”
myasthenia gravis. Brain 131 (Part 7): 1940–1952. doi:10.1093/brain/awn092. PMID 18515870.
PMC 2442426. http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18515870.
Losen M, Martínez-Martínez P, Phernambucq M, Schuurman J, Parren PW, and De Baets MH 2008.
Treatment of myasthenia gravis by preventing acetylcholine receptor modulation. Ann N Y
Acad Sci 1132: 174–179. doi:10.1196/annals.1405.034. PMID 18567867.
Losen M, Stassen MH, Martínez-Martínez P et al. 2005. Increased expression of rapsyn in muscles
prevents acetylcholine receptor loss in experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Brain 128
(Part 10): 2327–2337. doi:10.1093/brain/awh612. PMID 16150851.
McGrogan A, Sneddon S, and de Vries CS 2010. The incidence of myasthenia gravis: A systematic
literature review. Neuroepidemiology 34 (3): 171–183. doi:10.1159/000279334.
Oertelt S, Rieger R, Selmi C, Invernizzi P, Ansari A, Coppel R, Podda M, Leung P, and Gershwin M
2007. A sensitive bead assay for antimitochondrial antibodies: Chipping away at AMA-negative
primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 45 (3): 659–665. doi:10.1002/hep.21583. PMID 17326160.
Pedreira S, Sugai E, Moreno ML et al. 2005. Significance of smooth muscle/anti-actin autoantibodies
in celiac disease. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 35 (2): 83–93. PMID 16127984.
Quinnell RJ, Bethony J, and Pritchard DI 2004. The immunoepidemiology of human hookworm infec-
tion. Parasite Immunol 26 (11–12): 443–454. doi:10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00727.x. PMID 15771680.
Rojo E, Martín R, Carter C, Zouhar J et al. 2004. VPEgamma exhibits a caspase-like activity that contrib-
utes to defense against pathogens. Curr Biol 14 (21): 1897–1906. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.056.
PMID 15530390.
Rosen FS, Cooper MD, and Wedgwood RJ 1995. The primary immunodeficiencies. N Engl J Med 333
(7): 431–440. doi:10.1056/NEJM199508173330707. PMID 7616993.
Sato KJ 2000. The HLA system. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med 343 (11): 782–786. doi:10.1056/
NEJM200009143431106. PMID 10984567.
Saunders K, Raine T, Cooke A, and Lawrence C 2007. Inhibition of autoimmune type 1 diabetes
by gastrointestinal helminth infection. Infect Immun 75 (1): 397–407. doi:10.1128/IAI.00664-06.
PMID 17043101.
Scherer K, Bedlack RS, and Simel DL 2005. Does this patient have myasthenia gravis? JAMA 293 (15):
1906–1914. doi:10.1001/jama.293.15.1906. PMID 15840866.
Seybold ME 1986. The office tensilon test for ocular myasthenia gravis. Arch Neurol 43 (8): 842–843.
PMID 3729766.
130 Biotechnology in medical sciences
Szostecki C, Guldner HH, Netter HJ, and Will H 1990. Isolation and characterization of cDNA encod-
ing a human nuclear antigen predominantly recognized by autoantibodies from patients with
primary biliary cirrhosis. J Immunol 145 (12): 4338–4347. PMID 2258622.
Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández-Ronquillo L, Salinas V, Estanol B, and da Silva O 2004. Myasthenia
gravis and pregnancy: Clinical implications and neonatal outcome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
5: 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-5-42. PMID 15546494. PMC 534111. http://www.biomedcentral.
com/1471-2474/5/42. (Retrieved 2008-07-10).
Thieben MJ, Blacker DJ, Liu PY, Harper CM Jr, and Wijdicks EF 2005. Pulmonary function tests
and blood gases in worsening myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 32 (5): 664–667. doi:10.1002/
mus.20403. PMID 16025526.
Uz E, Loubiere LS, Gadi VK et al. 2008. Skewed X-chromosome inactivation in scleroderma. Clin Rev
Allergy Immunol 34 (3): 352–355. doi:10.1007/s12016-007-8044-z. PMID 18157513.
Wållberg M and Harris R 2005. Co-infection with Trypanosoma brucei prevents experimental autoim-
mune encephalomyelitis in DBA/1 mice through induction of suppressor APCs. Int Immunol
17 (6): 721–728. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxh253. PMID 15899926. http://intimm.oxfordjournals.
org/cgi/content/full/17/6/721.
Wesierska-Gadek J, Hohenuer H, Hitchman E, and Penner E 1996. Autoantibodies against nucleopo-
rin p62 constitute a novel marker of primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 110 (3): 840–847.
doi:10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608894. PMID 8608894.
Wohlleben G, Trujillo C, Müller J et al. 2004. Helminth infection modulates the development of aller-
gen-induced airway inflammation. Int Immunol 16 (4): 585–596. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxh062.
PMID 15039389.
Zaccone P, Fehervari Z, Phillips JM, Dunne DW, and Cooke A 2006. Parasitic worms and inflam-
matory diseases. Parasite Immunol 28 (10): 515–523. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00879.x. PMID
16965287.